<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ISP Wants Court to Sanction Piracy Monitoring Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crivins Episode 115 Uncut &#124; Unseen Studio</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crivins Episode 115 Uncut &#124; Unseen Studio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ISP Wants Court to Sanction Piracy Monitoring Firm [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ISP Wants Court to Sanction Piracy Monitoring Firm [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crivins Episode 115 &#124; Unseen Studio</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crivins Episode 115 &#124; Unseen Studio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ISP Wants Court to Sanction Piracy Monitoring Firm [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ISP Wants Court to Sanction Piracy Monitoring Firm [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 16/9/2014: Firefox OS Smartphones in Bangladesh, “Treasure Map” of the Internet &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links 16/9/2014: Firefox OS Smartphones in Bangladesh, “Treasure Map” of the Internet &#124; Techrights]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ISP Wants Court to Sanction Piracy Monitoring Firm [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ISP Wants Court to Sanction Piracy Monitoring Firm [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[That_Anonymous_Coward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What never fails to amaze me is the ZOMG THE SKY IS FALLING we hear from the legacy players while they have the largest incomes ever, pay less taxes than ever, and get handouts from many levels of government to underwrite their productions.
But they need more laws because they refuse to adapt to a changing market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What never fails to amaze me is the ZOMG THE SKY IS FALLING we hear from the legacy players while they have the largest incomes ever, pay less taxes than ever, and get handouts from many levels of government to underwrite their productions.<br />
But they need more laws because they refuse to adapt to a changing market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fail Again</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Fail Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just want to add here that there has been an encouragement from the Obama administration to make streaming of copyrighted material a felony.

Here&#039;s a link to the white paper (PDF) which outlines their desires:

&lt;strong&gt;ADMINISTRATION&#039;S WHITE PAPER ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT LEGISLATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS&lt;/strong&gt;
March 2011
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ip_white_paper.pdf

The image below is from page 12.

Arstechnica article about it:
&lt;strong&gt;Obama “IP czar” wants felony charges for illegal Web streaming&lt;/strong&gt;
March 15, 2011
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/03/obama-ip-czar-wants-felony-charges-for-illegal-web-streaming/

I have not found anything to indicate that anything has passed which would make it a felony, but I could be wrong.

I do recall the takedown of some guy&#039;s sites which linked to complete episodes of &#039;The Simpsons&#039; and &#039;Family Guy.&#039;

However, that was in Canada and I don&#039;t know if it was considered the equivalent of a felony there -- statutory and punitive damages were settled for $10.5 million (CAD). I&#039;m sure they will get their money, am I right? :-)

&lt;strong&gt;Simpsons Pirate Ordered to Pay Fox $10.5 Million in Damages&lt;/strong&gt;
January 2, 2014
http://torrentfreak.com/simpsons-pirate-ordered-to-pay-fox-10-5-million-in-damages-140102/

I can&#039;t recall anything in the U.S. which would be similar except for Jammie Thomas-Rasset being ordered to pay $222,000 for sharing 24 songs and the case of Joel Tenenbaum, who also was ordered to pay $675,000. I am certain these were civil lawsuits and not criminal.

&lt;strong&gt;Jammie Thomas-Rasset Loses Supreme Court Appeal, Must Pay $222,000 For Illegal Downloads&lt;/strong&gt;
March 18, 2013
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/jammie-thomas-rasset-supreme-court-illegal-downloading_n_2902093.html

If anyone knows if there has been a change in any copyright law making simple file sharing a felony, I would like to hear about it -- as would everyone else, I suspect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to add here that there has been an encouragement from the Obama administration to make streaming of copyrighted material a felony.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the white paper (PDF) which outlines their desires:</p>
<p><strong>ADMINISTRATION&#8217;S WHITE PAPER ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT LEGISLATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS</strong><br />
March 2011<br />
<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ip_white_paper.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ip_white_paper.pdf</a></p>
<p>The image below is from page 12.</p>
<p>Arstechnica article about it:<br />
<strong>Obama “IP czar” wants felony charges for illegal Web streaming</strong><br />
March 15, 2011<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/03/obama-ip-czar-wants-felony-charges-for-illegal-web-streaming/" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/03/obama-ip-czar-wants-felony-charges-for-illegal-web-streaming/</a></p>
<p>I have not found anything to indicate that anything has passed which would make it a felony, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>I do recall the takedown of some guy&#8217;s sites which linked to complete episodes of &#8216;The Simpsons&#8217; and &#8216;Family Guy.&#8217;</p>
<p>However, that was in Canada and I don&#8217;t know if it was considered the equivalent of a felony there &#8212; statutory and punitive damages were settled for $10.5 million (CAD). I&#8217;m sure they will get their money, am I right? :-)</p>
<p><strong>Simpsons Pirate Ordered to Pay Fox $10.5 Million in Damages</strong><br />
January 2, 2014<br />
<a href="http://torrentfreak.com/simpsons-pirate-ordered-to-pay-fox-10-5-million-in-damages-140102/" rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/simpsons-pirate-ordered-to-pay-fox-10-5-million-in-damages-140102/</a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t recall anything in the U.S. which would be similar except for Jammie Thomas-Rasset being ordered to pay $222,000 for sharing 24 songs and the case of Joel Tenenbaum, who also was ordered to pay $675,000. I am certain these were civil lawsuits and not criminal.</p>
<p><strong>Jammie Thomas-Rasset Loses Supreme Court Appeal, Must Pay $222,000 For Illegal Downloads</strong><br />
March 18, 2013<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/jammie-thomas-rasset-supreme-court-illegal-downloading_n_2902093.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/jammie-thomas-rasset-supreme-court-illegal-downloading_n_2902093.html</a></p>
<p>If anyone knows if there has been a change in any copyright law making simple file sharing a felony, I would like to hear about it &#8212; as would everyone else, I suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fail Again</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Fail Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;That &quot;Don&#039;t Mess With Texas&quot; thing was actually an anti-littering campaign.&lt;/strong&gt;


Yeah, I remember that. As soon as you entered Texas you would see the roadsigns with the slogan immediately.


Didn&#039;t someone get arrested at the Alamo some time ago for pissing on it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>That &#8220;Don&#8217;t Mess With Texas&#8221; thing was actually an anti-littering campaign.</strong></p>
<p>Yeah, I remember that. As soon as you entered Texas you would see the roadsigns with the slogan immediately.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t someone get arrested at the Alamo some time ago for pissing on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Fail Again</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You Fail Again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, you&#039;re correct. It is Federal law. My bad.

However -- I was quick to jump on it because they are trying to scare people into believing it is a felony to engage in file sharing. That&#039;s what a lot of people &quot;hear&quot; when words like &quot;Federal law&quot; are thrown at them (as in their voicemail).

There &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a Bill introduced in 2003/2004 which would have made it a felony.

It was the Piracy Deterrence and Education Act of 2004.
The bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on September 28, 2004 but was never passed by the Senate.

I believe it would have allowed for huge fines and a possibility of receiving up to 6 years in prison if found guilty.

Right now, I am not aware of the possibility of file sharing being treated as a felony unless there is criminal infringement by way of receiving profit in the execution of the infringement..

When I think about copyright law -- it&#039;s as you said -- my brain sort of shuts down. Not unusual for me. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re correct. It is Federal law. My bad.</p>
<p>However &#8212; I was quick to jump on it because they are trying to scare people into believing it is a felony to engage in file sharing. That&#8217;s what a lot of people &#8220;hear&#8221; when words like &#8220;Federal law&#8221; are thrown at them (as in their voicemail).</p>
<p>There <i>was</i> a Bill introduced in 2003/2004 which would have made it a felony.</p>
<p>It was the Piracy Deterrence and Education Act of 2004.<br />
The bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on September 28, 2004 but was never passed by the Senate.</p>
<p>I believe it would have allowed for huge fines and a possibility of receiving up to 6 years in prison if found guilty.</p>
<p>Right now, I am not aware of the possibility of file sharing being treated as a felony unless there is criminal infringement by way of receiving profit in the execution of the infringement..</p>
<p>When I think about copyright law &#8212; it&#8217;s as you said &#8212; my brain sort of shuts down. Not unusual for me. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[That_Anonymous_Coward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretenda is still squirming.
Hans has moved onto filing lawsuits for ADA (disability access laws) violations, he is such a nice guy he even filed a case for someone who never hired him.
Steele has just come to an agreement of somesort with the contractor who worked on his McMansion so the lien was withdrawn (kind of, don;t think the builder trusts him).
Duffy will be in court in 2 days IIRC trying to explain away all of the stupid things he did in Prenda v. Internets before they have even moved onto the original complaint.  Its a special kind of stupid to get sanctioned multiple times before you even get to present evidence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretenda is still squirming.<br />
Hans has moved onto filing lawsuits for ADA (disability access laws) violations, he is such a nice guy he even filed a case for someone who never hired him.<br />
Steele has just come to an agreement of somesort with the contractor who worked on his McMansion so the lien was withdrawn (kind of, don;t think the builder trusts him).<br />
Duffy will be in court in 2 days IIRC trying to explain away all of the stupid things he did in Prenda v. Internets before they have even moved onto the original complaint.  Its a special kind of stupid to get sanctioned multiple times before you even get to present evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[That_Anonymous_Coward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think its fun that they are abusing yet another loophole in the DMCA that was already closed.  They lied to the court, this is going to hurt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its fun that they are abusing yet another loophole in the DMCA that was already closed.  They lied to the court, this is going to hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>/isp-wants-court-to-sanction-piracy-monitoring-firm-140915/#comment-1237760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[That_Anonymous_Coward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=93963#comment-1237760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually Copyright Law is Federal Law.  It keeps there from being 50 or more different variations on the laws. (You think it is a mess today, you should have seen it before).

Copyright lawsuits get coverage and people hear the $150K possible damages and the brain sort of shuts down.  This is how trolls are successful, and the reason there is a community committed to explaining the law &amp; exposing the lies they tell targets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Copyright Law is Federal Law.  It keeps there from being 50 or more different variations on the laws. (You think it is a mess today, you should have seen it before).</p>
<p>Copyright lawsuits get coverage and people hear the $150K possible damages and the brain sort of shuts down.  This is how trolls are successful, and the reason there is a community committed to explaining the law &amp; exposing the lies they tell targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
