Comments on: Kyrgyzstan’s Biggest Torrent Site Shutdown By Police

By: neo.styles|nvDX

neo.styles|nvDX — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:39:13 +0000

My boss peddled my anal hole out to 5 RIAA bosses tonight… I was so pleased i let them bukkake.. On my face ofcourse..

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:50:22 +0000

4nd ownz .neo.styles – common sense will always overcome the dying dinosaur that is the RIAA. Of course, we don’t have to modify the laws or create meaning for words that don’t exist, unlike those out of touch idiots running the major industries.

I still fail to see how I stole anything when I copied a file. I haven’t seen a single valid argument from the MAFIAA shills, just the same old recycled propaganda their worshippers (.neo.nostyles for one) continue to peddle… Kinda reminds me of those Jesus camps they have in the US, only this brainwashing tactic won’t work on us.

By: Common Man

Common Man — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:10:47 +0000

‘For God’s sake you taking something for nothing,’

We do that all the time. We take sunlight for nothing. We take oxygen for nothing. We take the sights and sounds of the open field for nothing. We take the roads for nothing.

Sigh… I can only suggest that you get a grip and realize that not everything in this world needs to have a price tag. But as you’re probably an American, you worship money anyway, so my advice is wasted on you.

By: I Killed John Sullivan

I Killed John Sullivan — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:18:20 +0000

For God’s sake you taking something for nothing, it’s not that complicated. Is it grand larceny or the end of the world? No. I see it on par with shoplifting stuff you wouldn’t buy in the first place.

By: Yertul

Yertul — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:11:44 +0000

@ neostyles um what?
Just because we download something that doesn’t mean that we would of bought it in the first place. Second the bigstudios of hollywood steal ideas all the time. Why is it ok for them to steal according to you, but not us even though it could be argued that what we are doing is not theft? Anyway this is the 21st century, look at hulu it doing great, thats what companies should be doing with movies.

By: LOL

LOL — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:55:29 +0000

Krygyburgyhurdygurdystan o.O

By: RIAA

RIAA — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 08:03:02 +0000

NEW WORLD ORDER

By: RIAA

RIAA — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 07:57:20 +0000

OUR CHINA COUNTERPARTS ARE SUCCEEDING.

MUAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAAHAHHAHA

By: Bobe-On

Bobe-On — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:49:35 +0000

To Kyrgystan (and other countries’) gov./reps.:

“Stop treating the scarce as if it were non-scarce, but also stop treating the non-scarce as if it were scarce… Knowledge, unlike throughput, is not divided in the sharing, but multiplied. Once knowledge exists, the opportunity cost of sharing it is zero and its allocative price should be zero… Sharing knowledge costs little, does not create un-repayable debts, and it increases the productivity of the truly rival and scarce factors of production. Existing knowledge is the most important input to the production of new knowledge, and keeping it artificially scarce and expensive is perverse. Patent monopolies (aka ‘intellectual property rights’) should be given for fewer ‘inventions’, and for fewer years. Costs of production of new knowledge should, more and more, be publicly financed and then the knowledge freely shared.

The following is a link to the full text of his speech From a Failed Growth Economy to a Steady-State Economy. It is brimming with scientific and pragmatic insights that extend well beyond open source.”
–http://opensource.org/node/441

See also Steady State Economics. Cool stuff.

Clearly, government representatives are often the least informed when they should be the most.

By: mr.T

mr.T — Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:14:40 +0000

who?

@38 – Great assumption, really. (and no im not american, but making assumptions based on tit heads on tv does not mean the whole nation is geographicly challenged.) Im sure you managed to know exactly where that place is as soon as you saw the name. *rolls eyes*