Comments on: Meet DtecNet – RIAA’s New Anti-Piracy Partners

By: Waiting to enlist providers, RIAA continues to attend in courts | Sir Arthur's Den

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:16:32 +0000

[...] partner DtecNet Software, that has bumped MediaSentry for the unauthorized downloads inquiries, are exactly the same used by the above said MediaSentry and by any other being based on the use of an ordinary P2P client to [...]

By: In attesa di arruolare i provider, RIAA continua a frequentare i tribunali | Sir Arthur's Den

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:48:19 +0000

[...] DtecNet Software, che ha preso il posto di MediaSentry nelle indagini sui download non autorizzati, sono esattamente gli stessi impiegati dalla suddetta MediaSentry e da chiunque altro essendo basati sull’utilizzo di un banale [...]

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:41:43 +0000

"since no anti-piracy company is capable of identifying uploads to anyone but itself"

What ? If you're part of a swarm for a file, that file is the only thing being exchanged. The hash checks make it a guarantee that you are doing this. So what exactly does a peer reporting that it has 20% of a file, then that it has 30% of a file identify if not that they have received an upload ?

They've already identified themselves as participating in uploading/downloading a pirated file and on top of that you can see them doing it.

Are you really going to act surprised when courts finally decide to take this as evidence too ? I mean, literally every other case/suit they hear doesn't have this standard of evidence and admission of guilt going on.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:58:21 +0000

Actually, I agree with him. I wish death DAILY on the people running the MPAA, RIAA and a few other things in this country.
I'm not going to kill them myself or help someone kill them….. but if an accident happens to them, I will be DANCING IN THE STREETS.

By: Christopher

Christopher — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:55:26 +0000

Yeah, you REALLY think that just speaking out is going to get anything done? The only time our government EVER steps in on behalf of the people is when they are fearful for one of two things: their lives or their jobs!
I'll be blunt: I condone ANY action against these people, save those that cause physical harm to someone else IMMEDIATELY AND DIRECTLY. That means vandalism…. I'm fine with it against these companies.

By: Crandom

Crandom — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:50:08 +0000

faeces

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:45 +0000

Hard work? You mean hard work plundering the artist's hard work, you industry scum. The holy spirit dictates that you deserve to be dead already, and it is possible that someone may need carry out the will of the holy spirit. It is possible that the natural order of the world may now need to be restored, and that the sinner may now need to be sent to hell. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:36 +0000

setting a building on fire is going to hurt innocent people regardless of neighbors That is why I recommend against it. However, how could DDoS attacks do that much? You know, I am sure that much of what you have stated has already been done. "It would be unsound fancy and self-contradictory to expect that things which have never yet been done can be done except by means which have never yet been tried." -- Francis Bacon "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:22 +0000

Actually, much political action here translates into non-government organizations. Although political parties may have helped in the past with various political movements, most of it was non-governmental organizations. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze

By: Roze

Roze — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:13 +0000

Just because you write that it is absurd, doesn't make it absurd. Écrasez l'Infâme! Crush the infamous thing! Roze