<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Millions of File-Sharers Hide Their Identities Online</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lolbot</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-616534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lolbot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-616534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@73 That&#039;s what the FEMA coffins are for silly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@73 That&#8217;s what the FEMA coffins are for silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zviedri sl?psies, bet turpin?s zagt Internet? &#171; BLOGFOX</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-615918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zviedri sl?psies, bet turpin?s zagt Internet? &#171; BLOGFOX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-615918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] sl?pt savas darb?bas T?mekl?. Zviedru p?tnieki ir izskait?juši, ka šobr?d Zviedrij? savas darb?bas Internet? sl?pj jau 6-7 procenti Interneta lietot?ju (kas ir vair?k k? pusmiljons lietot?ju) un turpm?k šie skait?i tikai [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sl?pt savas darb?bas T?mekl?. Zviedru p?tnieki ir izskait?juši, ka šobr?d Zviedrij? savas darb?bas Internet? sl?pj jau 6-7 procenti Interneta lietot?ju (kas ir vair?k k? pusmiljons lietot?ju) un turpm?k šie skait?i tikai [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zviedri sl?psies, bet turpin?s zagt Internet? &#124; Kristaps Skutelis (krizdabz) par tehnolo?ij?m un dz?vi</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-615886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zviedri sl?psies, bet turpin?s zagt Internet? &#124; Kristaps Skutelis (krizdabz) par tehnolo?ij?m un dz?vi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-615886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] sl?pt savas darb?bas T?mekl?. Zviedru p?tnieki ir izskait?juši, ka šobr?d Zviedrij? savas darb?bas Internet? sl?pj jau 6-7 procenti Interneta lietot?ju (kas ir vair?k k? pusmiljons lietot?ju) un turpm?k šie skait?i tikai [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sl?pt savas darb?bas T?mekl?. Zviedru p?tnieki ir izskait?juši, ka šobr?d Zviedrij? savas darb?bas Internet? sl?pj jau 6-7 procenti Interneta lietot?ju (kas ir vair?k k? pusmiljons lietot?ju) un turpm?k šie skait?i tikai [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swedish Internet Traffic Recovers After Initial IPRED Scare &#124; InstantIdiocy</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-615728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swedish Internet Traffic Recovers After Initial IPRED Scare &#124; InstantIdiocy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-615728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Cyber Norms sociological research project reported that 10% of Swedes aged between 15 and 25 were taking measures to neutralize online surveillance, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Cyber Norms sociological research project reported that 10% of Swedes aged between 15 and 25 were taking measures to neutralize online surveillance, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swedish Internet Traffic Recovers After Initial IPRED Scare &#8211; FUCK THE RIAA</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-615714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swedish Internet Traffic Recovers After Initial IPRED Scare &#8211; FUCK THE RIAA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-615714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Cyber Norms sociological research project reported that 10% of Swedes aged between 15 and 25 were taking measures to neutralize online surveillance, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Cyber Norms sociological research project reported that 10% of Swedes aged between 15 and 25 were taking measures to neutralize online surveillance, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swedish Internet Traffic Recovers After Initial IPRED Scare - P2P Talk?</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-615584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swedish Internet Traffic Recovers After Initial IPRED Scare - P2P Talk?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-615584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Cyber Norms sociological research project reported that 10% of Swedes aged between 15 and 25 were taking measures to neutralize online surveillance, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Cyber Norms sociological research project reported that 10% of Swedes aged between 15 and 25 were taking measures to neutralize online surveillance, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-615375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-615375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@77 I don&#039;t say this often but, coming from a clinical psychology professor from an Ivy League institution, I am pleasantly surprised. Your claim of piracy being analogous to underground slave activity is the most thought provoking idea I have read on this topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@77 I don&#8217;t say this often but, coming from a clinical psychology professor from an Ivy League institution, I am pleasantly surprised. Your claim of piracy being analogous to underground slave activity is the most thought provoking idea I have read on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-614192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-614192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@34: In the United States prior to 1865, one could be criminally prosecuted for housing or transporting runaway slaves. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 furthermore empowered slave catchers to freely cross state boundaries in pursuit of their quarry and enjoined local authorities to assist in the recovery of suspected runaways -- even in free states. The law was contentious and drew considerable public criticism from abolitionists, who rightly declared it immoral, but so long as it was in effect, free citizens continued to be arrested for assisting escaped slaves. Some Americans therefore chose to clandestinely support runaway slaves by participating in the Underground Railroad, a network of safehouses and secret routes leading through the free states to Canada. They took measures to keep their activities secret because discovery would be ruinous for themselves, their families, and their accomplices. Were these people cowards for taking a stand while also acting to shield themselves from unjust laws? You may not agree that IP piracy is comparable to assisting runaway slaves, but yours is not ultimately the opinion that matters. The pirates clearly do believe in what they are doing (and I&#039;m inclined to agree with them, since I understand that intellectual property, when taken to its logical extreme, necessarily requires mind control*) and are willing to continue sharing files regardless of the dictates of the law. That does not mean they must gleefully sacrifice themselves in order to make a point. That&#039;s stupid. It is far more sensible to simply circumvent unjust laws until such time as they are no longer enforceable.

* No, this is not hyperbole. People are now being charged with copyright infringement for singing songs in public. What will happen if/when it becomes possible to digitally record and transmit human sensory information? Suddenly, your experience of a live concert would be considered &quot;protected material&quot;, the act of sharing your memories an infringement of some IP owners copyright. In a media-saturated environment full of proprietary imagery, you wouldn&#039;t be able to walk down the street without owing royalties to scores of coporations. Under current and/or pending draconian IP laws, you would literally lose control of the contents of your own brain. That is mind control, and it is only a matter of time before a combination of advancing technology and retrograde legislation makes such absurd-seeming scenarios a reality. If the laws do not change by then, the consequences will be explosive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@34: In the United States prior to 1865, one could be criminally prosecuted for housing or transporting runaway slaves. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 furthermore empowered slave catchers to freely cross state boundaries in pursuit of their quarry and enjoined local authorities to assist in the recovery of suspected runaways &#8212; even in free states. The law was contentious and drew considerable public criticism from abolitionists, who rightly declared it immoral, but so long as it was in effect, free citizens continued to be arrested for assisting escaped slaves. Some Americans therefore chose to clandestinely support runaway slaves by participating in the Underground Railroad, a network of safehouses and secret routes leading through the free states to Canada. They took measures to keep their activities secret because discovery would be ruinous for themselves, their families, and their accomplices. Were these people cowards for taking a stand while also acting to shield themselves from unjust laws? You may not agree that IP piracy is comparable to assisting runaway slaves, but yours is not ultimately the opinion that matters. The pirates clearly do believe in what they are doing (and I&#8217;m inclined to agree with them, since I understand that intellectual property, when taken to its logical extreme, necessarily requires mind control*) and are willing to continue sharing files regardless of the dictates of the law. That does not mean they must gleefully sacrifice themselves in order to make a point. That&#8217;s stupid. It is far more sensible to simply circumvent unjust laws until such time as they are no longer enforceable.</p>
<p>* No, this is not hyperbole. People are now being charged with copyright infringement for singing songs in public. What will happen if/when it becomes possible to digitally record and transmit human sensory information? Suddenly, your experience of a live concert would be considered &#8220;protected material&#8221;, the act of sharing your memories an infringement of some IP owners copyright. In a media-saturated environment full of proprietary imagery, you wouldn&#8217;t be able to walk down the street without owing royalties to scores of coporations. Under current and/or pending draconian IP laws, you would literally lose control of the contents of your own brain. That is mind control, and it is only a matter of time before a combination of advancing technology and retrograde legislation makes such absurd-seeming scenarios a reality. If the laws do not change by then, the consequences will be explosive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing To Hide</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-613789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nothing To Hide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-613789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@74 Reasoned Mind, thanks for the clarification. Putting one&#039;s real identity behind one&#039;s support of agendas in this realm (on either side) would still invite fishing expeditions and would just make one a target, naturally. Certain people associated with Creative Commons have been branded by industry attorneys &amp; so forth as being &quot;anti-copyright&quot;, the very broad and inaccurate brush you paint us TF readers with. There&#039;s a broad range of views here &amp; elsewhere; I&#039;d venture that many of us are very much pro-copyright, but, like the Creative Commons advocates, are against unnecessarily restrictive, increasingly impractical, culture-undermining, profit-maximizing licensing and ever-extended terms which prevent copyright&#039;s intended limitations from working. You/the industry continues to reveal itself to be comfortable issuing blatant distortions of truth and ad hominem attacks in order to persuade the ignorant that people are &quot;anti-copyright&quot; if they&#039;re in any way critical of your self-serving commoditization of art and abuse of copyright, the courts, and legislatures. And then there&#039;s the issue of fabricated evidence, improper identification of alleged infringers, and other shenanigans that have come up in the music industry&#039;s civil proceedings. One need only read Ray Beckerman&#039;s blog for a few minutes to see how desperate the industry is to nail someone, anyone, for anything at all. Why expose ourselves to that kind of risk? Better to post anonymously.

A few do publish under their own names and engage in critical, rational discourse in copyright: William Patry, the Copycense bloggers, a few others... but the rest of us (yourself included) have chosen to inject our tiny, anonymous voices into the meme pool, reasoning that over time, we&#039;ll exert some influence while we reiterate our positions and refine the points we choose to draw attention to. Even if it has no effect, it at least helps to make it clear that there&#039;s a wide range of points of view, not just the two extremes that each side (industry &amp; consumer) likes to brand just &quot;right&quot; and &quot;wrong&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@74 Reasoned Mind, thanks for the clarification. Putting one&#8217;s real identity behind one&#8217;s support of agendas in this realm (on either side) would still invite fishing expeditions and would just make one a target, naturally. Certain people associated with Creative Commons have been branded by industry attorneys &amp; so forth as being &#8220;anti-copyright&#8221;, the very broad and inaccurate brush you paint us TF readers with. There&#8217;s a broad range of views here &amp; elsewhere; I&#8217;d venture that many of us are very much pro-copyright, but, like the Creative Commons advocates, are against unnecessarily restrictive, increasingly impractical, culture-undermining, profit-maximizing licensing and ever-extended terms which prevent copyright&#8217;s intended limitations from working. You/the industry continues to reveal itself to be comfortable issuing blatant distortions of truth and ad hominem attacks in order to persuade the ignorant that people are &#8220;anti-copyright&#8221; if they&#8217;re in any way critical of your self-serving commoditization of art and abuse of copyright, the courts, and legislatures. And then there&#8217;s the issue of fabricated evidence, improper identification of alleged infringers, and other shenanigans that have come up in the music industry&#8217;s civil proceedings. One need only read Ray Beckerman&#8217;s blog for a few minutes to see how desperate the industry is to nail someone, anyone, for anything at all. Why expose ourselves to that kind of risk? Better to post anonymously.</p>
<p>A few do publish under their own names and engage in critical, rational discourse in copyright: William Patry, the Copycense bloggers, a few others&#8230; but the rest of us (yourself included) have chosen to inject our tiny, anonymous voices into the meme pool, reasoning that over time, we&#8217;ll exert some influence while we reiterate our positions and refine the points we choose to draw attention to. Even if it has no effect, it at least helps to make it clear that there&#8217;s a wide range of points of view, not just the two extremes that each side (industry &amp; consumer) likes to brand just &#8220;right&#8221; and &#8220;wrong&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One</title>
		<link>/millions-of-file-sharers-hide-their-identities-online-091103/#comment-613476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[One]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=18539#comment-613476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@83 Such a big subject, cleverly talked about by all here in one way or another and that&#039;s the best you can do Dummy go look that up clever boy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@83 Such a big subject, cleverly talked about by all here in one way or another and that&#8217;s the best you can do Dummy go look that up clever boy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
