Comments on: ‘New’ Anti-Piracy Lawyers Chase UK File-Sharers

By: Mr Innocent

Mr Innocent — Wed, 20 May 2009 14:08:15 +0000

Update :

£ days after posting an email to ACS law on the email contained within the letter i still have not had any reply from them. Not even an out of office response which all GOOD lawyers post as a matter of courtesy.
The email had a 7 day notice attached to it that after 7 days of no response then i would consider the matter legally closed and no further action would be taken…as of yet there has as i say been no response!

I stated in the email that i have proof that their alleged accusations are false and that at their own expense they can send my computer for analyse to search fruitlessly for the named file and only the named file as that is what is alleged to be there and as i have other sensitive private files and documents on there too i don’t want any old Davenport, Lyons & harry fooling around with it now do i ;) but as i say they can waste their time and money doing it as once proven that it isn’t there then they and NOT me owe somebody a lot of money….

By: Zimnoid

Zimnoid — Mon, 18 May 2009 03:39:36 +0000

Then DL and ACS are passing information to each other in breach of the Data Protection Act. Contact the ICO straight away and get them to initiate an investigation/prosecution.

By: Sbub

Sbub — Sat, 16 May 2009 13:07:00 +0000

I have received a letter from ACS as well and phoned my ISP (sky). They told me that the High Court order came from Davenport Lyons. And then they pretend they are not related? And does that not make the procedure faulty? ie court odrer from DL and letter to me from ACS?

By: George

George — Thu, 14 May 2009 15:30:36 +0000

^^ When Devenport tried this, did the people who ignored it just get let off in the end and is that the same with the people who denied it – how many paid up etc??

By: Mr Innocent

Mr Innocent — Thu, 14 May 2009 13:39:39 +0000

The game in question is from a so called trusted uploader and actually contained 1 iffy looking tracker that led to an online website for collecting data on each of the files, this has now been removed from the tracker list of each file as far as i can see when i checked yesterday. They can analyse my computer for this file and it wont show up as i never did what they say but if they wish to spend thousands of pounds wasting their own money then who am i not to let them as at least then the whole world will laugh at the silly losers.
ps : And we all thought nigerian lottery scammers were sly customers, i’m starting to think they have a secret training camp for scammers set up over there where these people learn their trade ;)

Personally i think this will all be over once it reaches main stream UK TV hopefully even the watchdog TV programme as they have been here before….

By: Meee

Meee — Thu, 14 May 2009 13:17:52 +0000

Thats very nice, people are getting sued and you crack that joke.

By: lol

lol — Thu, 14 May 2009 12:17:16 +0000

the game its onabout is from a trusted uploader so you says use a trusted uploaders torrents lol

By: Paul T

Paul T — Thu, 14 May 2009 05:13:47 +0000

Who gives a shit about these law firms? They are all a bunch of tossers.

If anybody receives a letter from them, do the right thing and throw it in the bin. What they guoing to do? Send me another one?

Ha I will never respond or even acknowledge them.

Everybody should have a different person for each of your torrents eg music, videos and games. Use the pirate bay and only use trusted uploader, then you cant be stung into a trap,

Happy days, tell them to get to fuck.

Bin it!!!

By: Zimnoid

Zimnoid — Thu, 14 May 2009 05:10:44 +0000

But court orders obtained by means of deliberately misleading the court mean that any evidence obtained cannot be accepted by the courts at subsequent hearings.

By: Gregorz

Gregorz — Thu, 14 May 2009 04:46:41 +0000

@ziminoid

Since it was obtained by a court order doesnt that make it legal.