<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jamendo Site Has CC License Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huddel</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huddel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear sir or ma&#039;am, 

PUR is not a site of censorship backers, pur is a government site that list alternatives for finding, sampling, using, remixing and buying content. It&#039;s the only decent thing the government did in the whole hadopi mess and it&#039;s a shame it had to come together.

To have a CC commons site be pointed by the government as a sensible and responsible use of licensing and a standing example of respecting the rights of artists and users offering free music with unlimited download is probably an honor.

You should see that not as bad thing, but as a good one: the government is acknowledging the potential of the CC-license and of independant promotion and sharing platforms.

Still, is not like jamendo asked to be included there, the government compiled the list by itself, I wish sometimes part of the userbase here didn&#039;t acted so much on their emotions and acted more based on reason.

There are things to be upset? Sure! But not everything is a matter of fighting the man, some are really just misunderstadings, and you&#039;re jumping the gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear sir or ma&#8217;am, </p>
<p>PUR is not a site of censorship backers, pur is a government site that list alternatives for finding, sampling, using, remixing and buying content. It&#8217;s the only decent thing the government did in the whole hadopi mess and it&#8217;s a shame it had to come together.</p>
<p>To have a CC commons site be pointed by the government as a sensible and responsible use of licensing and a standing example of respecting the rights of artists and users offering free music with unlimited download is probably an honor.</p>
<p>You should see that not as bad thing, but as a good one: the government is acknowledging the potential of the CC-license and of independant promotion and sharing platforms.</p>
<p>Still, is not like jamendo asked to be included there, the government compiled the list by itself, I wish sometimes part of the userbase here didn&#8217;t acted so much on their emotions and acted more based on reason.</p>
<p>There are things to be upset? Sure! But not everything is a matter of fighting the man, some are really just misunderstadings, and you&#8217;re jumping the gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sddssd</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sddssd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuck JAMENDO, they are in PUR(hadopi, see in pur.fr).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck JAMENDO, they are in PUR(hadopi, see in pur.fr).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammartin</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jammartin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s right, the CC licenses may not be properly displayed on the music pages: the is only Jamendo the first release of the new version, which will see a lot of improvements in the coming weeks.
They just stated the following about CC:
The Creative Commons license for each track is visible on the bottom of each track page, but as many users had difficulties locating them, we will move them so they are more clearly presented. Of course, Jamendo is and always was a platform where all content is under Creative Commons.

http://blog.jamendo.com/2012/05/03/response-to-the-community/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right, the CC licenses may not be properly displayed on the music pages: the is only Jamendo the first release of the new version, which will see a lot of improvements in the coming weeks.<br />
They just stated the following about CC:<br />
The Creative Commons license for each track is visible on the bottom of each track page, but as many users had difficulties locating them, we will move them so they are more clearly presented. Of course, Jamendo is and always was a platform where all content is under Creative Commons.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.jamendo.com/2012/05/03/response-to-the-community/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.jamendo.com/2012/05/03/response-to-the-community/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huddel</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huddel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not acurate, get your facts straight!
1) CC content can be licensed blocking Non-Commercial (NC) and Non-Derivative (ND) as it can be seen here:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 2) What they do is that if you want to use songs that are licensed as NC and/or ND  for commercial and derivative purposes, they arranged a easy way to license the music directly for those purposes for a really cheap fee and unlimited use,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not acurate, get your facts straight!<br />
1) CC content can be licensed blocking Non-Commercial (NC) and Non-Derivative (ND) as it can be seen here:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 2) What they do is that if you want to use songs that are licensed as NC and/or ND  for commercial and derivative purposes, they arranged a easy way to license the music directly for those purposes for a really cheap fee and unlimited use,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr R'Lyeh</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr R'Lyeh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ There are different types of CC licenses. Some variants permit commercial usage, others strictly forbid it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> There are different types of CC licenses. Some variants permit commercial usage, others strictly forbid it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob8urcakes</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob8urcakes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ If that&#039;s accurate Chris, and I&#039;ve no reason whatsoever to doubt you or think it is, then Jamendo quite simply needs to die a quiet and not necessarily painless death.

I absolutely abhor rip-off companies who exploit their targeted customer-base by deliberately lying to them, and specially when they use such a noble, terrific and FREE service as CreativeCommons licensing =  Grrrrrr.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If that&#8217;s accurate Chris, and I&#8217;ve no reason whatsoever to doubt you or think it is, then Jamendo quite simply needs to die a quiet and not necessarily painless death.</p>
<p>I absolutely abhor rip-off companies who exploit their targeted customer-base by deliberately lying to them, and specially when they use such a noble, terrific and FREE service as CreativeCommons licensing =  Grrrrrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jamendo has always been trying to rip people off though. They&#039;ve always said that even to use a CC BY licensed song commercially, you have to buy a license from them. This is NOT true. CC BY grants you permission to use the track commercially without compensating the artist in ANY way besides providing attribution. And that&#039;s not even the half of it! They also try to get you to buy licenses for ANY use besides home listening, even if it&#039;s allowed by the CC license. In other words, they have downright lied to their users before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamendo has always been trying to rip people off though. They&#8217;ve always said that even to use a CC BY licensed song commercially, you have to buy a license from them. This is NOT true. CC BY grants you permission to use the track commercially without compensating the artist in ANY way besides providing attribution. And that&#8217;s not even the half of it! They also try to get you to buy licenses for ANY use besides home listening, even if it&#8217;s allowed by the CC license. In other words, they have downright lied to their users before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[not in a clear way, and not with a link to the actual license specifying what is and isn&#039;t allowed. The version and locality of the license is also not specified.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not in a clear way, and not with a link to the actual license specifying what is and isn&#8217;t allowed. The version and locality of the license is also not specified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lhsi</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-919002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lhsi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-919002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Creative Commons info is at the bottom of each page for an individual track, isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Creative Commons info is at the bottom of each page for an individual track, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/new-jamendo-has-cc-license-issues-120502/#comment-918998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=50419#comment-918998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that gives a link to the human-readable license which specifies the terms. It&#039;s preferred to use the licence-specific image though.
Jamendo used to do this, they don&#039;t any more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that gives a link to the human-readable license which specifies the terms. It&#8217;s preferred to use the licence-specific image though.<br />
Jamendo used to do this, they don&#8217;t any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
