Comments on: New Zealand Gave Kim Dotcom Residency, Knowing He Was Wanted By FBI

By: New Zealand Gave Kim Dotcom Residency, Knowing He Was Wanted By FBI » Geeks Cafe

Sun, 14 Apr 2013 07:28:25 +0000

[...] Source: Nеw Zealand Gave Kim Dotcom Residency, Knowing Hе Wаѕ Wanted Bу FBI [...]

By: Livvyy Sims

Livvyy Sims — Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:35:00 +0000

If you think Irene`s story is really cool,, last pay-check my daughter also recieved a check for $9118 putting in a ninteen hour week from their apartment and their classmate’s mother-in-law`s neighbour done this for six months and easily made over $9118 part time on their labtop. the instructions on this web-site………. BIT40.ℂom

By: New Zealand Gave Kim Dotcom Residency, Knowing He Was Wanted By FBI | Lulzworthz

Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:32:51 +0000

[...] Source: New Zealand Gave Kim Dotcom Residency, Knowing He Was Wanted By FBI [...]

By: Guest

Guest — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:43:00 +0000

“There were also his historic convictions for hacking, computer fraud and phone card dealings to consider.”- He sounds like a right sham to be honest. A false prophet if you will.

By: Under the table

Under the table — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:01:00 +0000

Australia doesn’t have much of a choice in political parties. The opposition Liberal party want to take us back to the stone age with crappy copper wires delivering communications to the homes of its citizens instead of the NBN’s optical fibre, woeful workers rights, cutting social welfare whilst increasing corporate welfare and demonising refugees. If their Con-Dem counterparts in the UK are anything to go by, Australia will be subject to double-dip reccessions and massive job losses. And all this will happen come springtime.

By: icec0ld

icec0ld — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:00:00 +0000

“It would depend,. If they are offering services into the US, and transacting with US customers in the US, then yes, they are very likely subject to US laws. That wouldn’t be for transactions that don’t involve the US in any manner, but when deal with Americans and transacting business in the US, yeah… they can be liable under US law.”

I fail to see how.

The US citizen is a guest in the country it is conducting and thus a privilege. Not the other way around.

“It’s not about the net changing it’s legal standing – it’s a question of where ALL of the parties are located in a business transaction, and if some of them are in the US, then the transaction can be subject to US law.”

So if US is involved in any way, the US law overrides any law? That’s is not how it works. There is not superiority of law. You conduct business internationally there are laws for that. You cannot be subject to the whims of a country when you live in another. It just doesn’t work. Fact.

“Otherwise, the internet would degrade down to being subject to whatever country has the laxest laws on everything. Someone could use one of those offshore oil platform things, declare a country where there is no copyright law and then sell and stream PPV every movie to people all over the world without any come back. You know that wouldn’t stand up to a legal challenge for more than 30 seconds in the US (or almost any other country).”

Uhhhhh isn’t this already the case? http://www.oceanworld.net/

The US does not own the internet. It does not police the internet. It polices who it can bully and nothing more.

There are plenty of countries with no copyright. TPB still runs in spite of this and world keeps on turning cause no one that matters actually cares or is effected. This is the sad tragedy of scum,like your self. You’re yelling at clouds and creating the problem, not fixing it.

By: icec0ld

icec0ld — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:47:00 +0000

If you’d read my post and not just one line you’d have noticed one thing:

I pointed out limiting liability in a publicly traded organization is a normal thing and not unusual at all. THAT IS WHY CORPORATIONS PUBLICLY TRADE. You’ve just agreed with me.

Forget actually learning about business laws Bob since I actually likely know more about it than you, you need an English comprehension test. You accuse me of not reading your posts and then demonstrate your inability to do the same. Comedy gold

By: ScrewEwe2

ScrewEwe2 — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:35:00 +0000

My house doesn’t have a basement and I’ve got one of Koch’s damn pipelines running directly underneath my house. It’s about 8 to 10 feet underground, but I was pissed after I moved in and found out. I’m always getting Koch publications and warnings about digging in my yard. I can remember seeing monthly publications from the John Birch Society sent to my old man when I was a teenager. My old man and I never saw much in common during those years because I was a little wanna be Hippie and he was a republican redneck who hated long hair and anything illegal. The scary thing, is that as we each got older we were starting to agree on things more and more, but most son’s can never live up to their fathers expectations. The Hippie thing passed quickly when I realized I was mainly interested in Sex and Drugs and Rock and Roll, and not as interested in saving Whales or hugging trees. Getting into punk rock also left me with the attitude that Hippies must Die.

By: Scary_Devil_Monastery

Scary_Devil_Monastery — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:05:00 +0000

20 jahre knast soll er haben…wofür?

Also, es gab einmal im deutschland gesetze die das schon gut ermöglichten. Ich denke du willst dir auf alter tradition gut verlassen, wie?

By: Scary_Devil_Monastery

Scary_Devil_Monastery — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:04:00 +0000

Wieder mal so ein geistig erarmter mensch.

Also, unschuldige leute packt man nicht ins knast. Ausser natürlich man sei einen der wenigen der verpasst hat das seit 1945 ein anderer gesetzlicher ordnung sich in deutschland ergibt.