Comments on: P2P Sites’ Injunctions Overturned, Anti-Piracy Group Fined

By: Rugg

Rugg — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:00:25 +0000

Really, when people show up at your door with a court-order, just ask if you can make a call first to the judge who ordered it. This is allowed here in Belgium. Also, if their are no police-officers with them you can just say you first want to see some police. So when they try to sue my website http://www.streamingtvsitcoms.com/ they will need to come with some real court-orders.

By: Kickass_Sid

Kickass_Sid — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:41:38 +0000

Actually he should sue them!

By: UGG

UGG — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:57:24 +0000

We have many beautiful down jacket and boots, I hope you will be happy to shopping www.uggnetshop.com

By: Links 26/11/2009: Cringely Likes Chrome OS, Ulteo Open Virtual Desktop 2.0 is Out | Boycott Novell

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:14:15 +0000

[...] P2P Sites’ Injunctions Overturned, Anti-Piracy Group Fined Preliminary injunctions against two file-sharing portals have been overturned, paving the way for a re-opening. The sites’ lawyers have proven that hard drive evidence collected during a controversial raid against the sites’ admin is worthless, and the anti-piracy group involved has been fined by the court for acting in bad faith. [...]

By: law is ANTICHRIST

law is ANTICHRIST — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:47:19 +0000

thats awesome news… many of you think 500eu is too little… but actually its not the amount its the fact that the court agreed they operated in bad faith… making way for other cases to say hey these ppl have a record of acting in bad faith they need to prove what it is they are accusing ppl of.

if u get into a car accident and the other driver gets a fine and you dont it pretty much says the other drive is at fault.

By: h33t

h33t — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:49:43 +0000

the MAFIAA are the real animals

By: Ninja

Ninja — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:07:02 +0000

Wow, total ownage!

Next step: sue SGAE for trespassing and some other crimes (like pretending to be officials)…

Awesome.

By: RIAAtarded

RIAAtarded — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:39:47 +0000

how is it they weren’t charged for misrepresentation and impersonating an officer of the court plus if they lied on the dismissal of the original case how is that not abuse of process and only a 500$ fine. Generally penalties are levelled as a deterrent to doing it again 500$ is a joke. I hope this guy goes after them for damages for all the site downtime, legal bills etc. If they want pirates to pay for wrong doing they should be required to do so as well when they are wrong.

By: diggerbick

diggerbick — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:36:17 +0000

so magnet links on BT sites should work out as well, since not a single byte of information passes through the site…

By: Someone

Someone — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:31:10 +0000

A judge listened to the defendant in a file sharing case? :o

Maybe not all hope is lost.