Also it was blobsnail and minions idea to censor scientists producing actual scientific reports he didn’t like (like i mentioned before). I just proposed the opposite.

Keeping lobbying and other nonsense documents out of the field of science would on some level be very welcome but i know it would not be in the best interest of free speech.

BTW: Nobody here would mind if those fake researchers wouldn’t be able to publish their garbage.

No, they should go through a peer review process and be published in a peer reviewed scientific journal. Like real scientists already do.

Violence breeds more violence. That’s not restricted to physical violence. So what of the worst case scenario? Let’s say total confrontation with stately forces being bribed somewhere in the chain of command to be the active party, so to speak the “foot soldier”, in the confrontation. At some point things might turn real ugly. How to react then? And how can bystanders be protected from collateral damage?

Don’t get me wrong: A line definitively has to be drawn! A boycott is a good way of doing so and I’m nobodys father to tell him or her what to do or what not. We’re just at times right before a real crash of markets. And if the past says anything, then that things tend to escalate real fast without anyone wanting it to in such times. So at least having an idea on what to do, when things don’t turn out as estimated, would be a wise step.