Comments on: ShareConnector Case Appealed After Two Years

By: A chicken passeth by

A chicken passeth by — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:39:37 +0000

The media has so much money, that if it fails, all it has to do is wait until the law changes, and try again. They can even invest a bit more to change the laws, just to speed the process along.

It’s quite unfortunate, but this shows that boycotting simply doesn’t work. They take too long to run out of money for that strategy to work.

By: Buying Life Insurance After Being Diagnosed With Cancer | GoogleTrends.US

Buying Life Insurance After Being Diagnosed With Cancer | GoogleTrends.US — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:27:47 +0000

[...] ShareConnector Case Appealed After Two Years | TorrentFreak [...]

By: Trade Show Case Studies | #1 Tade Show Display

Trade Show Case Studies | #1 Tade Show Display — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:09:45 +0000

[...] ShareConnector Case Appealed After Two Years | TorrentFreak [...]

By: time traveling white rabbit

time traveling white rabbit — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:10:27 +0000

@17

why so angry? especially over something irrelavent. swearing at people and calling them names on a blog makes you sound like the noob. and by the other responses to your statement your the noob with his face firmly in his palm.

By: uknowme

uknowme — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:15:41 +0000

Thanks Ernesto, thanks Enigmax.

Can only reiterate what ^ Troc is saying.

I’ve not noticed any bias. Even those that get accused of being shills for the MAFIAA have continued to post their arugments, etc. without being censored. (except a temporary delay sometimes because a certain keyword was used.)

By: Troc Ster

Troc Ster — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:40:36 +0000

I’ve been posting and reading comments on TF for while and never had a problem with bias.

Pro and anti p2p views are often posted here(along with tons of drivel).

Any systematic efforts suppress one point of view or another would have been flagged a long time ago on other sites.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:36:08 +0000

@17 Aug 18, 2009 at 15:45 by DiE #3!:

Maybe is your windoze machine because it works fine here on linux LoL

The ping version for windows don’t have a “counter switch”?

ps: is “-n” but don’t tell anyone LoL

By the way the “l” option in windows means “buffer size”(that is why you said something about 65K right?) but on linux is “preload”(send without waiting for a response).

By: BREINless

BREINless — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:18:26 +0000

Of course they’ll win. They’ll just make sure they get a copyright friendly puppet judge that is completely ignorant about the internet. I’m sure BREIN has already wined and dined the judge that they picked, but most inportantly fed him/her all the misinformation possible and packed all the lies up as cold hard facts.

They know this technique works. It’s used by the RIAA/MPAA and their ilk to get exactly what they want from politicians, law makers, corporation heads, organization heads, the police and even the
military.

They’ll use TPB ruling as precedence. You are guilty even if you have done absolutely nothing wrong. Now with TPB gone, no one else has enough money or guts to stand up to them and show the world the fascists that the RIAA/MPAA really are.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:13:10 +0000

17 Aug 18, 2009 at 15:45 by DiE #3!

@3: STFU! Noob!

Theres “ping -c” does nothing because you can’t use “-c”!
You properly mean “ping -l” but that can MAX be “65500? and will NEVER work as a DoS

Fucking noob!

It works fine here, maybe is your machine, I just tried out :)

And any traffic can deny service it just need to be big enough hence the “flash mob” part.

Care to explain to us how thousands of people sending ICMP echo packets to the same server at the same time will not overload that server?

By: Finn fined just €3,000 for sharing 768MB of music | linkthe.com

Finn fined just €3,000 for sharing 768MB of music | linkthe.com — Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:53:27 +0000

[...] ShareConnector Case Appealed After Two Years (torrentfreak.com) [...]