<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Show Doing Well On BitTorrent? We’ll Buy It, Says Media Giant</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Goods &#124; Show being pirated on BitTorrent? It must be good.</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-994365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Goods &#124; Show being pirated on BitTorrent? It must be good.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-994365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [Source] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Source] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Torrent Market</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-989489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Torrent Market]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-989489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a public acknowledgement of the popularity of torrents, Fairfax Head of Video Ricky Sutton recently said he to utilized bit torrent as a market research tool, purchasing content on the basis of its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a public acknowledgement of the popularity of torrents, Fairfax Head of Video Ricky Sutton recently said he to utilized bit torrent as a market research tool, purchasing content on the basis of its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Australijski koncern medialny dzieli si? zyskami z witrynami torrentowymi &#124; Co nas uwiera</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-987885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Australijski koncern medialny dzieli si? zyskami z witrynami torrentowymi &#124; Co nas uwiera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-987885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] torrentfreak Podziel si?: Pin It Tags: australia, bittorrent, fairfax, fairfax media, p2p, ricky sutton, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] torrentfreak Podziel si?: Pin It Tags: australia, bittorrent, fairfax, fairfax media, p2p, ricky sutton, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatternGuru714</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-985721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PatternGuru714]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-985721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why wouldn&#039;t they screw everyone by spreading potentially good Indie films on P2P, driving down the price the films are likely to get from aftermarket sales, then offering to purchase at a discount? Then they own the rights for a tiny amount.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why wouldn&#8217;t they screw everyone by spreading potentially good Indie films on P2P, driving down the price the films are likely to get from aftermarket sales, then offering to purchase at a discount? Then they own the rights for a tiny amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcGnome</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-985714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pcGnome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-985714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always known that bittorrent is like a &quot;free range&quot; Nielson box.

pcG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always known that bittorrent is like a &#8220;free range&#8221; Nielson box.</p>
<p>pcG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scary Devil Monastery</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-985510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scary Devil Monastery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-985510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually...Sony has managed to generate such a pot of ill will amongst customers the sting is actually being felt quite harshly.

When the PS3 was first announced one thing Sony did was to promise it would be unlocked - hoping to wean the part of the market which has hitherto been Xbox-aligned away (mainly IT-savvy people who liked using the xbox as a cheap server).

Then they reverse that decision and piss off thousands of IT geeks and hackers who&#039;d bought the PS3 exclusively in order to run it as an ultracheap mainframe server.

As a result, said IT crowd sat down and started hacking the PS3, eventually succeeding, and then published the key. You may recall how well that panned out for Sony when it turned out that hacking the master key to the PS3 also gave access to Sony&#039;s developer network &lt;b&gt;and some of their customer master data&lt;/b&gt;.

&lt;b&gt;So Yes, Sony DID INDEED end up shit creek when they decided to remove the functionalities they&#039;d promised their customers from the PS3&lt;/b&gt;.

&quot;Conservative&quot;, above, is one of thousands of people, including me, who now view Sony as a horde of scumbag scam artists hell-bent on screwing their customers over for shitz and giggles.

Added to their previous launch of the &quot;Sony Rootkit&quot; it&#039;s not far-fetched to say that today any person going to a techie of their aquaintance in order to obtain purchasing advice will get &quot;Just don&#039;t buy Sony&quot;.

It&#039;s the advice I give.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually&#8230;Sony has managed to generate such a pot of ill will amongst customers the sting is actually being felt quite harshly.</p>
<p>When the PS3 was first announced one thing Sony did was to promise it would be unlocked &#8211; hoping to wean the part of the market which has hitherto been Xbox-aligned away (mainly IT-savvy people who liked using the xbox as a cheap server).</p>
<p>Then they reverse that decision and piss off thousands of IT geeks and hackers who&#8217;d bought the PS3 exclusively in order to run it as an ultracheap mainframe server.</p>
<p>As a result, said IT crowd sat down and started hacking the PS3, eventually succeeding, and then published the key. You may recall how well that panned out for Sony when it turned out that hacking the master key to the PS3 also gave access to Sony&#8217;s developer network <b>and some of their customer master data</b>.</p>
<p><b>So Yes, Sony DID INDEED end up shit creek when they decided to remove the functionalities they&#8217;d promised their customers from the PS3</b>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Conservative&#8221;, above, is one of thousands of people, including me, who now view Sony as a horde of scumbag scam artists hell-bent on screwing their customers over for shitz and giggles.</p>
<p>Added to their previous launch of the &#8220;Sony Rootkit&#8221; it&#8217;s not far-fetched to say that today any person going to a techie of their aquaintance in order to obtain purchasing advice will get &#8220;Just don&#8217;t buy Sony&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the advice I give.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scary Devil Monastery</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-985507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scary Devil Monastery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-985507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I suspect that what happens is that he goes onto TPB and watches the seed/leech count. Or starts a client and just counts the number in the swarm. That puts him in the clear.

Although to be fair that will only provide a good guesstimate, it&#039;ll certainly be enough to tell him that a file with a seed/leech count of 100/10000 appears to be quite popular compared to one which has 2/200.

And in the end all Fairfax really needs to know is &quot;Which releases are the current top ten in popularity?&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I suspect that what happens is that he goes onto TPB and watches the seed/leech count. Or starts a client and just counts the number in the swarm. That puts him in the clear.</p>
<p>Although to be fair that will only provide a good guesstimate, it&#8217;ll certainly be enough to tell him that a file with a seed/leech count of 100/10000 appears to be quite popular compared to one which has 2/200.</p>
<p>And in the end all Fairfax really needs to know is &#8220;Which releases are the current top ten in popularity?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scary Devil Monastery</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-985505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scary Devil Monastery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-985505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually...the key word is &quot;media&quot;. Fairfax approach into entertainment started with journalism. It might just be that the people running the company are of the bent which sits down and starts by asking the question &quot;So...where do we get the most accurate information...?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually&#8230;the key word is &#8220;media&#8221;. Fairfax approach into entertainment started with journalism. It might just be that the people running the company are of the bent which sits down and starts by asking the question &#8220;So&#8230;where do we get the most accurate information&#8230;?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farnsworth</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-985503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farnsworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-985503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re seeing obnoxious advertisements played during TV shows increasingly often these days, meaning torrents are no longer a means to avoid them. I would argue this gives true fans incentive to buy a show they love on DVD/BR. I certainly don&#039;t mind buying the exceptional ones on blu-ray. The difference in sharpness and color definition on a large HDTV is quite noticeable, plus you don&#039;t get the posterization one tends to see on downloads that are frequently over-compressed to keep file sizes down. You also get the special features, extended cuts, and sometimes a cool statuette or other knick knack.

My point is that if they still have a hold of your eyeballs, they still make money even if it&#039;s not coming directly from you. This is either a downside or an upside depending on how one wants to view it. I see it as both and probably necessary in order for shows to keep being made. I could be wrong, but I think the BSG: Blood and Chrome wasn&#039;t picked up specifically because it&#039;s too expensive to make. Hopefully this kind of thing won&#039;t be seen as a problem down the road once it&#039;s realized advertising dollars are still worth something even when shows are pirated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re seeing obnoxious advertisements played during TV shows increasingly often these days, meaning torrents are no longer a means to avoid them. I would argue this gives true fans incentive to buy a show they love on DVD/BR. I certainly don&#8217;t mind buying the exceptional ones on blu-ray. The difference in sharpness and color definition on a large HDTV is quite noticeable, plus you don&#8217;t get the posterization one tends to see on downloads that are frequently over-compressed to keep file sizes down. You also get the special features, extended cuts, and sometimes a cool statuette or other knick knack.</p>
<p>My point is that if they still have a hold of your eyeballs, they still make money even if it&#8217;s not coming directly from you. This is either a downside or an upside depending on how one wants to view it. I see it as both and probably necessary in order for shows to keep being made. I could be wrong, but I think the BSG: Blood and Chrome wasn&#8217;t picked up specifically because it&#8217;s too expensive to make. Hopefully this kind of thing won&#8217;t be seen as a problem down the road once it&#8217;s realized advertising dollars are still worth something even when shows are pirated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scary Devil Monastery</title>
		<link>/show-doing-well-on-bittorrent-well-buy-it-121010/#comment-985502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scary Devil Monastery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=58333#comment-985502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep. However, it would be sheer death for a number of currently incumbent clay feet colossi. When you&#039;re talking about large productions you&#039;re looking at dozens of stakeholders all locked down to the status quo by hundreds of incestuously recursive IP-license contracts.

In short, you might need a hundred man-hours worth of expensive lawyer time for every stakeholder just to free up one production for release in another format without serious legal risk.

Which just goes to show how very unwise betting on the ip-horse really is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. However, it would be sheer death for a number of currently incumbent clay feet colossi. When you&#8217;re talking about large productions you&#8217;re looking at dozens of stakeholders all locked down to the status quo by hundreds of incestuously recursive IP-license contracts.</p>
<p>In short, you might need a hundred man-hours worth of expensive lawyer time for every stakeholder just to free up one production for release in another format without serious legal risk.</p>
<p>Which just goes to show how very unwise betting on the ip-horse really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
