And if he is not he should. In any word-against-word confrontation in a court, it usually means the defendant carries the day.

As it should since the law clearly assumes innocence until guilt is proven. I know you’ve had trouble realizing that salient fact before.

“Tradition? Like this has happened hundreds or thousands of times, deliberately? Now give us the long list of all those cases to prove that this “tradition” exists.”

Would you like this list back to the baltic extraditions or would you settle for the time during the second world war when Sweden explicitly made a deal with nazi germany to guarantee and protect, by military force, the “prisoner transports” to and from Norway over swedish soil during the second world war?

Or would you settle only for the specific times where Sweden has explicitly delivered foreign nationals to what the swedish government knew beyond a doubt was torture and incarceration after any specific date?

I’m only asking because there is indeed one period, lasting a few decades, where Sweden did not practice what we could call “extraordinary rendition”.

Kindly name a time frame, because otherwise it will be a long long list indeed.

I advise – once more and once only – that you actually read up on the facts.

Being a self-proclaimed “hacker” means you should be supremely aware of the importance of actual fact.

Or you might just be a troll in which case i seriously advocate that you hide.

In a society where everything can be freely debated, good ideas prosper and bad ideas die (and are noted).
Child abuse is more or less prohibited by normal biological prerogative – it has no chance of becoming acknowledged. Ever. Only in the most sick and restricted societies was it even tolerated. It is not nor ever will be a realistic option today.

And this concerns almost every “freedom of speech” topic. The results when you block such freedoms are legion. Where I live it was unthinkable racists would ever occupy the parliament. Then “hate speech” was blocked and a decade later, here they are. Using more “politically correct” wording, but still bearing the same message.

In defending PRQ Sunde was doing more to defend children from abuse than your ill-conceived venom ever will, you idiot.

And in that you should check the german group Mogis – consisting of people who were abused as Children and as adults now make a stand against censorship because they see the harm that is done in preventing abuse.

If he’s guilty, he should NOT walk away as a free man after a fair trial.

“Sweden does however have a tradition in shipping off people the US wants shipped off to third-world hellholes without any need for extradition treaties or formal requests”

Tradition? Like this has happened hundreds or thousands of times, deliberately? Now give us the long list of all those cases to prove that this “tradition” exists.

I’m sure that you can back this up with a VERY long list. Or, however, are you afraid of or incapable of a factual discourse?