<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; Digitprotect</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/tag/digitprotect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>UK Lawyers Drop &#8220;Non-Viable&#8221; File-Sharing Cases</title>
		<link>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-lawyers-drop-non-viable-file-sharing-cases-091226/</link>
		<comments>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-lawyers-drop-non-viable-file-sharing-cases-091226/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enigmax]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACS:Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digitprotect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=20107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawyers who told thousands of individuals that they held proof of their illicit file-sharing, have made a surprise announcement. ACS:Law, who help companies generate revenue from porn movie copyrights, say they are dropping many cases because litigation is neither viable nor beneficial to their clients.<p>Source: <a href="https://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK law firm ACS:Law has made quite a name for itself in recent times. Representing companies such as Germany&#8217;s DigiProtect and their pornography business partners, ACS:Law has sent out many thousands of letters to individuals it claims have been sharing their clients&#8217; movies illegally online.</p>
<p>Their scheme has attracted much negative press, even provoking statements from Members of the House of Lords in the UK.</p>
<p>&#8220;Of late, we have seen a proliferation of lawyers’ letters, acting for the pornography industry, as the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, pointed out, often against innocent people asserting copyright claims and threatening court action,” <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/digital-economy-bill-lords-want-to-stamp-out-piracy-chasers-091208/">said</a> Lord Clement-Jones recently.</p>
<p>Now there has been a surprising &#8220;Christmas update&#8221; from ACS:Law. Referencing earlier legal threats they made to thousands of individuals in the UK (you&#8217;ve been caught file-sharing, we can prove it, and if you don&#8217;t pay up we&#8217;re taking you to court), the law firm has announced that it will drop many of its cases.</p>
<blockquote><p>As Christmas approaches, here at ACS Law we have been working hard dealing with our file sharing projects. We have been reviewing all cases which are currently open, and a good number of these cases have been dropped, where we do not either consider litigation to be a viable option or to be beneficial to our clients.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, despite the &#8220;forensic&#8221; standard proof the company claims to hold on individuals, it appears that, as we&#8217;ve said many times here on TorrentFreak, this scheme is all about money. If individuals have no money to pay, ACS:Law cannot get blood from a stone.</p>
<p>Furthermore, when trying to force others to pay up who may actually have the money, faced with holding a single IP address as evidence and absolutely no way of identifying a specific individual sitting at a keyboard and conducting or authorizing the actual infringement, they have little choice but to back down.</p>
<p>James Bench, who works with Being Threatened, a consumer group which offers resources to individuals who are targeted by ACS:Law, says that those accused are becoming increasingly empowered by the knowledge currently available.</p>
<p>&#8220;Recently <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/leaked-documents-reveal-anti-piracy-cash-operation-091115/">leaked documents</a> exposed the inner workings of the process, dubbed by some ‘speculative invoicing,’ showing that claims are assigned a ‘litigation rating’,&#8221; he told TorrentFreak.</p>
<p>&#8220;Factors affecting the rating tended not to be based on the evidence supporting the claim but on the appointment of legal representation, technical &#8216;savvy&#8217; and the finances of the client – or lack thereof,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>So does this mean that ACS:Law will be backing down completely? Hardly. The law firm says that following the <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/30000-internet-users-to-receive-file-sharing-cash-demands-091125/">court orders</a> they obtained in November, more threatening &#8216;pay up or else&#8217; letters will be sent out in January 2010.</p>
<p>Anyone receiving a letter from ACS:Law should refrain from replying to the company until they have spoken to the support team at <a href="http://www.beingthreatened.com">BeingThreatened.com</a>, who will give completely free advice.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-lawyers-drop-non-viable-file-sharing-cases-091226/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
