<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TorrentFreak &#187; Ed Richards</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/tag/ed-richards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>UK Communications Regulator Enters File-Sharing Debate</title>
		<link>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-communications-regulator-enters-file-sharing-debate-080708/</link>
		<comments>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-communications-regulator-enters-file-sharing-debate-080708/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[enigmax]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=2950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head of Ofcom, the independent regulator and competition organization for the communication industries in the UK, has suggested that they may not stay silent on the issue of file-sharing for much longer.<p>Source: <a href="https://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://torrentfreak.com/images/ofcom.gif" align="right" alt="Ofcom">The Office of Communications, or <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/">Ofcom</a> as it&#8217;s better known, is the UK&#8217;s independent regulator for the communications industry. Awarded power from the government under the Communications <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/ukpga_20030021_en_1">Act </a>2003, it has a duty to care for the rights and interests of UK citizens and consumers while protecting them from harmful and offensive material. It also has a responsibility to promote healthy competition in the telecoms marketplace.</p>
<p>At the <a href="http://www.intellectuk.org/">Intellect</a> Conference 2008, the head of Ofcom, Ed Richards, made a <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/speeches/2008/07/intellectconf">speech</a>. In it he touched on many issues but in an unusual move for Ofcom, towards the end of the speech he made some comments about file-sharing in the UK. In a section entitled &#8220;Sticking To Principles Of Good Regulation&#8221;, Richards stresses that Ofcom must not &#8220;duck difficult questions&#8221; where doing so would impact the long term success of the communications market. Of course, the question of online piracy is one such &#8216;difficult question&#8217; in what Richards describes as a &#8220;complex digital environment&#8221;.</p>
<p>Richards notes that just because Ofcom has not been overly vocal on the subject of file-sharing, that shouldn&#8217;t be interpreted as disinterest: &#8220;To date, Ofcom has not made a lot of public noise about the piracy issue. But that should not be mistaken for a lack of interest or concern. Our formal locus may be limited. But this sort of piracy is something that affects network operators, ISPs, content creators and consumers , and as the converged regulator we have of course been keeping a watchful eye on developments.&#8221;</p>
<p>Going on to speak about the need for ISPs and telecoms companies to invest in improved systems for a developing Internet, Richards notes that these businesses need to be assured that they can return profit on their investments:</p>
<p>&#8220;An operator investing in next generation networks will not want it clogged up with illegal peer-to-peer content if that means no-one will pay to ensure a return on the investment, as we have seen in some Asia Pacific markets. And content providers, self evidently, do not want illegal traffic undermining their investment in IPR.&#8221;</p>
<p>Richards feels that the issue of piracy is important for network providers and creators of content alike, and says that he hopes business agreements can be reached to find a solution, presumably as an alternative to a government implemented strategy such as the controversial &#8220;3 strikes&#8221; idea.</p>
<p>ISPs make a lot of money from their subscribers, with media-hungry file-sharers investing in high-bandwidth premium packages more often than regular users. With around 6 million file-sharers in the UK, these customers are a significant driving force behind the need to create the next generation Internet Richards mentioned earlier.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://torrentfreak.com">TorrentFreak</a>, for the latest info on <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/copyright-issues/">copyright</a>, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/category/pirate-talk/">file-sharing</a> and <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/which-vpn-services-take-your-anonymity-seriously-2014-edition-140315/">anonymous VPN services</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-communications-regulator-enters-file-sharing-debate-080708/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
