Comments on: Thomas Seeks New Lawyer to Appeal the RIAA

By: RIAA Pays $107,951 to Alleged Filesharer « All Things News

RIAA Pays $107,951 to Alleged Filesharer « All Things News — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:20:30 +0000

[...] a reporter about (illicit) filesharing, you would think that the only case involving the RIAA was Capitol V Thomas, a case that made news nationwide for the size of the fines. However, there are a number of cases [...]

By: RIAA Pays $107,951 to Alleged Filesharer - Zwartbaard

RIAA Pays $107,951 to Alleged Filesharer - Zwartbaard — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:13:29 +0000

By: La RIAA condannata a pagare 107.951 $ « JaKoPo - Un po’ di questo, un po’ di quello …

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:23:37 +0000

[...] l’ultimo successo giudiziario della RIAA contro il filesharing (Capitol V Thomas) Ã¨ stato pubblicizzato in lungo e in largo, non altrettanto Ã¨ accaduto con altri 2 casi dove la [...]

By: RIAA Pays $107,951 to Alleged Filesharer | TorrentFreak

RIAA Pays $107,951 to Alleged Filesharer | TorrentFreak — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:52:10 +0000

By: Zwartbaard » Blog Archive » Understanding Anti-Piracy Enforcement

Zwartbaard » Blog Archive » Understanding Anti-Piracy Enforcement — Fri, 16 May 2008 16:49:19 +0000

[...] advice, then get competent legal advice. This is a point most strongly emphasized by the Jammie Thomas trial, where she had legal advice, but it was NOT competent in the subject. Finally, for the most [...]

By: Understanding Anti-Piracy Enforcement - TorrentFreak at fluxbox.co.uk

Understanding Anti-Piracy Enforcement - TorrentFreak at fluxbox.co.uk — Fri, 16 May 2008 12:54:05 +0000

By: Understanding Anti-Piracy Enforcement | TorrentFreak

Understanding Anti-Piracy Enforcement | TorrentFreak — Wed, 14 May 2008 17:59:56 +0000

By: Chris

Chris — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:37:29 +0000

On top of all this, if its a bit torrent she only shared a bit of a song, not even an entire song, so therefore she is being sued for seconds of 24 different songs. So from a technical standpoint, you shouldn’t be able to sue a person for three seconds of a song. If your going to sue someone you need to have the every single person who shared a single song on trial and sue them all at once for a single song. I understand they are trying to make a statement and want to scare people that read headlines, but there is no way they should be able to gain 200,000+ dollars from her, video rental stores pay 80.00 max for the rights to share movies with other people, a single song rights should be no more than 20.00 a song. This amount is out of control.

By: Elizabeth J.

Elizabeth J. — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:51:38 +0000

Please donate to Jammie:

http://freejammie.com

By: ....-=\

....-=\ — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:48:38 +0000

If you want to fight them
RI** and MP**
Just ignore them
Roll over, go to sleep
Its not like they can bleed ya to death
Its just to scare ya and use as an example to others.
They don’t care me. I do whatever the hell I like, its my rights.