You linked your personal opinion of the movie with the fact that it was produced by the MPAA. As I have already pointed out, the MPAA has no bearing whatsover on content or quality.

I love it how if you disagree with someone's viewpoint you always accuse them of being paid by the MPAA/RIAA to post here.

Please post a quote of where you think I advocated for the MPAA/RIAA.

You will not find one shred of evidence to support your argument that the MPAA has any bearing whatsoever on production of any kind. Please post a link if you can.

That's your interpretation but nonetheless that is what I do – if you think it is negative I fail to see why but fair enough – it is just what I happen to do. It is also my interpretation that many people who post here saying they support good content do not do so as it has been my experience that people who obtain content for free are simply not interested in purchasing the same product as they've already experienced it. Why would they?

""I love it how if you disagree with someone's viewpoint you always accuse them of being paid by the MPAA/RIAA to post here."
That is something only an industry advocate would say.

You moron! It's not "only something an industry advocate would say", how about a poster who actually isn't an industry advocate and has no connection whatsever to the industry being accused of the same? The reasons I said that is because you've accused me when I am not and STFU who to me doesn't seem to be advocating for the industry at all but merely disagreeing with some of your points.

"you basically espouse every viewpoint defending industry"
Creating a bad movie is not bad business practice because it's an impossible ask: you cannot predict beforehand how many people will like a movie, how well it will be made or how much critical acclaim it will achieve. You cannot call the failure to achieve something that is impossible "bad business practice" because it's unachievable.