<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Most Pirated Movies on BitTorrent</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bootleg Corner Top 10 Most Pirated Movies on BitTorrent</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-532307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bootleg Corner Top 10 Most Pirated Movies on BitTorrent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-532307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (last week) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (last week) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Torrents &#187; Top 10 Most Pirated Movies on BitTorrent</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-531508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News Torrents &#187; Top 10 Most Pirated Movies on BitTorrent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-531508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (last week) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (last week) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miron</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-531064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-531064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I download only axxo because all his rips always have translation in English and Spanish]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I download only axxo because all his rips always have translation in English and Spanish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIOHazard87</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-530383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BIOHazard87]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-530383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ 25


Uh.. how can you compare R5&#039;s from a group like PUKKA to Axxo who only does DVDRips. PUKKA does a fine job on their dvdrips, occasionally a slip up will happen and they or someone else will repack, but for the most part they&#039;re quality. Oh, also to inform you, Diamond doesn&#039;t do telesync releases. Only quality xvid DVDRips. Only 5 movies out of MANY releases since 2006 have been nuked and am sure at least 2 of those were insignificant nukes. Isn&#039;t shit. Diamond owns.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 25</p>
<p>Uh.. how can you compare R5&#8242;s from a group like PUKKA to Axxo who only does DVDRips. PUKKA does a fine job on their dvdrips, occasionally a slip up will happen and they or someone else will repack, but for the most part they&#8217;re quality. Oh, also to inform you, Diamond doesn&#8217;t do telesync releases. Only quality xvid DVDRips. Only 5 movies out of MANY releases since 2006 have been nuked and am sure at least 2 of those were insignificant nukes. Isn&#8217;t shit. Diamond owns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-530306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-530306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[as far as i know, all current benjamin button torrents are missing some scenes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as far as i know, all current benjamin button torrents are missing some scenes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STANLEE</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-530279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[STANLEE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-530279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NICE ONE]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NICE ONE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akademos</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-530274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[akademos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-530274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree..DiAMOND is better than aXXo ! 
Infact i find FXG rips better than aXXo...the only thing with aXXo torrents are that they are better seeded even for an old release..look for a year old aXXo release and u will still see a descent d/l rate !
For new ones I will still go for a well seeded scener like pukka or diamnond !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree..DiAMOND is better than aXXo !<br />
Infact i find FXG rips better than aXXo&#8230;the only thing with aXXo torrents are that they are better seeded even for an old release..look for a year old aXXo release and u will still see a descent d/l rate !<br />
For new ones I will still go for a well seeded scener like pukka or diamnond !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ( . Y .)</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-530256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[( . Y .)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-530256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Devise.... now that&#039;s a quality p2p group]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devise&#8230;. now that&#8217;s a quality p2p group</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NubCakes</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-530246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NubCakes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-530246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no idea if aXXo &quot;steals&quot; scene rips - actually I highly doubt he re-encodes XviDs as posted above because the quality loss doesn&#039;t appear to be there.  

He may well encode from scene DVD-Rs, in which case there is a small quality loss in many cases - because most DVD movies are released as DVD9 and the main title usually goes over both layers.  The scene makes most DVD-R releases as DVD5 and hence re-encodes MPEG2 with some loss of quality.

If aXXo (or anyone) encodes these to MPEG4 (Xvid) then the quality will not be as good as someone encoding from a retail DVD to Xvid because there has been an extra lossy encoding step.

The reason I say to avoid aXXo is it&#039;s not scene.  The scene has standards to ensure quality and if releases don&#039;t pass these standards then they&#039;re nuked.

I&#039;ve never seen a 2 CD aXXo release - doesn&#039;t mean they aren&#039;t out there mind you, I don&#039;t get files from places where aXXo releases are to be found anymore.  Many DVDs require a 1.4GB release to keep a good level of quality up according to scene standards.

Not all P2P groups are crap - Devise, GrandDK are two that aren&#039;t - however aXXo, imo isn&#039;t up to standards at all.  And generally I stick to scene content because it has a quality standard that any random releaser does not have, including proper sources, preperation (cropping etc.),  encoder settings and a warranty of quality of sorts (IE. nukinh of bad releases).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea if aXXo &#8220;steals&#8221; scene rips &#8211; actually I highly doubt he re-encodes XviDs as posted above because the quality loss doesn&#8217;t appear to be there.  </p>
<p>He may well encode from scene DVD-Rs, in which case there is a small quality loss in many cases &#8211; because most DVD movies are released as DVD9 and the main title usually goes over both layers.  The scene makes most DVD-R releases as DVD5 and hence re-encodes MPEG2 with some loss of quality.</p>
<p>If aXXo (or anyone) encodes these to MPEG4 (Xvid) then the quality will not be as good as someone encoding from a retail DVD to Xvid because there has been an extra lossy encoding step.</p>
<p>The reason I say to avoid aXXo is it&#8217;s not scene.  The scene has standards to ensure quality and if releases don&#8217;t pass these standards then they&#8217;re nuked.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen a 2 CD aXXo release &#8211; doesn&#8217;t mean they aren&#8217;t out there mind you, I don&#8217;t get files from places where aXXo releases are to be found anymore.  Many DVDs require a 1.4GB release to keep a good level of quality up according to scene standards.</p>
<p>Not all P2P groups are crap &#8211; Devise, GrandDK are two that aren&#8217;t &#8211; however aXXo, imo isn&#8217;t up to standards at all.  And generally I stick to scene content because it has a quality standard that any random releaser does not have, including proper sources, preperation (cropping etc.),  encoder settings and a warranty of quality of sorts (IE. nukinh of bad releases).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gozza</title>
		<link>/top-10-most-pirated-movies-on-bittorrent-090209/#comment-530244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gozza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=9622#comment-530244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aXXo always had good quality, not the same can be said for Diamond with his telesync BS, or Pukka with their R5 bad sound &amp; missing minutes crap. Another reason why aXXo is a winner is because he leaves the endcredits in there. 

That being said I think mpaa assholes have taken over this thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aXXo always had good quality, not the same can be said for Diamond with his telesync BS, or Pukka with their R5 bad sound &amp; missing minutes crap. Another reason why aXXo is a winner is because he leaves the endcredits in there. </p>
<p>That being said I think mpaa assholes have taken over this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
