Comments on: Transmission 0.7 Beta – Redefining BitTorrent on the Mac

By: Transmission 0.7 Beta - Redefining BitTorrent on the Mac | Home gardening tips

Mon, 06 Oct 2008 03:55:54 +0000

[...] the most appealing BitTorrent clients for the Mac. Here’s Torrentfreak’s review of it.read more | digg [...]

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:26:45 +0000

[quote comment="82074"]How do we know if our isp is throteling or not torrents trafic? I'm downloading at 140K with transmission, and only at 2K with Azureus the same file. Could anyone explain why? Thank you.[/quote]

By: scott

scott — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:01:51 +0000

the new version of limewire is the easiest way i download on avarage 120kb – 300kb for torrents or another program is flashget with downloads at an awsome 10 percent of your internet connection at 8mb you get between 780kb and 920kb google it people. a whole film in 15 mins it took me a hour and half to download a whole season or sopranos

By: 105

105 — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:29:29 +0000

hi.

i’ve been using bittorrent but recently switched to transmission. its really easy to use but i havent downloaded anything from transmission days ago i finished downloading already but it went to 0% again. now my download progress was already 60% then decreased to 54%. i dont get it. . .how do i fix that?

By: James

James — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:28:17 +0000

Transmisson is nice and light-weight, and Azureus is more CPU intensive, but more feature-loaded. I love Transmission, it was great for when I was a torrent n00b and could barely even figure out how to use Transmission itself! =P

But now the choice for me is definitely Azureus. The ability to rename how torrents are displayed single handedly sealed the deal since I have seeded almost 200 torrents at one time. The advanced features can be daunting…. but it’s not too hard to learn.

I must admit that I hate that Vuze s**t in Azureus. If there weren’t the option of using the old, classic, UI (user interface) I would jump right back on the Transmission bandwagon. The Vuze content slows down my computer and wastes a huge amount of bandwidth, not to mention that all the HD content in Vuze has 1 seed and hundreds of leeches.

So what does this all mean for you? Well, take both clients out for a spin. Depending on how much you use torrents and how “advanced” of a user you are, you will be sure to fall in love with one or another. Transmission and Azureus are both great Mac apps. There are always other clients (but they be banned on certain trackers), just say the hell away from Xtorrent.

By: stu

stu — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:03:17 +0000

iv downloaded transmission for my mac but when i open it, and search for something, theres no results.. can sum1 help plz

By: Apple is Not Fruit » Transmission 0.7 Beta - Redefining BitTorrent on the Mac

Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:32:00 +0000

[...] read more | digg story [...]

By: Guido

Guido — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:54:54 +0000

I have tried Azureus and Transmission and the key reason I dont like Transmission is because it seems that after i download a torrent, it stops seeding. In other terms, it only helps my ration when I am downloading as jacked as that seems. Playing around with the options does nothing at all either.

I miss UTorrent….anyone have any advice for a guy trying to get more upload power!?

By: DvD del.icio.us bookmarks : June 27, 2007 at Wannaplay.it

DvD del.icio.us bookmarks : June 27, 2007 at Wannaplay.it — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:17:07 +0000

[...] Transmission 0.7 Beta – Redefining BitTorrent on the Mac | TorrentFreak : [...]

By: uTorrent for Mac is Coming: An Early Review | TorrentFreak

uTorrent for Mac is Coming: An Early Review | TorrentFreak — Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:29:56 +0000

[...] faster in it than in any other BitTorrent client. This held true when I compared uTorrent Mac to Transmission and Xtorrent. The downloads speeds in both couldn’t match uTorrent’s. Azureus was the [...]