<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Anti-Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: derr</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-649405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[derr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-649405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dont forget the other company jumping on the bandwagon on behalf of a porn company since February 2010- tilly bailey irvine- contact person sending out the letters there is Amanda Mitten using a letetr similar to the previous ones and asking for £700]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dont forget the other company jumping on the bandwagon on behalf of a porn company since February 2010- tilly bailey irvine- contact person sending out the letters there is Amanda Mitten using a letetr similar to the previous ones and asking for £700</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surys</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-649067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Surys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-649067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACS:Law... if you don&#039;t like being called wankers... stop being wankers!

Stop threatening and extorting people over exaggerated claims and distortions from the music industry.

You cannot prove that anyone you are suing had distributed even one unit of product to another person who is not covered by &quot;fair use&quot; or &quot;fair dealing&quot; exemptions.

You cannot accurately state the degree of infringement (in most cases it is equivalent to LESS than one unit of one product - ACTUAL losses totalling between £1 and £20 per infringement in most cases).

Losses can be projected at zero (because many people wouldn&#039;t have bought it anyway!) just as much as they can be projected to meet your wild, inflated figures based on the assumption that every downloader would buy a product if they couldn&#039;t get the junk for free.

The connection owner isn&#039;t necessarily the infringer.  The infringement could be due to authorised or unauthorised use of the defendants internet connection or by many people authorised to use that connection.

Without a court order, you cannot force compliance to any of your demands and so people are quite within their right to state they know nothing about the infringement, that there are many people who could be the infringer and that they are not willing to provide details of all people using their connection as it&#039;s a breach of privacy if not supported by the aforementioned court order.

This means your threats are usually difficult to enforce, can be seen as a waste of court&#039;s time for the infitecimal degree of the infringement and will often be a waste of time if consumers are tech-savvy and know your limitations (compared to your over-exaggerated claims of authority... such as is typical with DCAs)

ACS:Law, you&#039;ll temporarily ruin a few people&#039;s lives, scare others senseless and harass many more, all based on scant evidence... 

You&#039;re not doing it for right vs wrong... nor to protect anyone... you&#039;re doing it for one thing and one thing only... MAFIAA money.

ACS:Law, there is no doubt...

you are wankers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACS:Law&#8230; if you don&#8217;t like being called wankers&#8230; stop being wankers!</p>
<p>Stop threatening and extorting people over exaggerated claims and distortions from the music industry.</p>
<p>You cannot prove that anyone you are suing had distributed even one unit of product to another person who is not covered by &#8220;fair use&#8221; or &#8220;fair dealing&#8221; exemptions.</p>
<p>You cannot accurately state the degree of infringement (in most cases it is equivalent to LESS than one unit of one product &#8211; ACTUAL losses totalling between £1 and £20 per infringement in most cases).</p>
<p>Losses can be projected at zero (because many people wouldn&#8217;t have bought it anyway!) just as much as they can be projected to meet your wild, inflated figures based on the assumption that every downloader would buy a product if they couldn&#8217;t get the junk for free.</p>
<p>The connection owner isn&#8217;t necessarily the infringer.  The infringement could be due to authorised or unauthorised use of the defendants internet connection or by many people authorised to use that connection.</p>
<p>Without a court order, you cannot force compliance to any of your demands and so people are quite within their right to state they know nothing about the infringement, that there are many people who could be the infringer and that they are not willing to provide details of all people using their connection as it&#8217;s a breach of privacy if not supported by the aforementioned court order.</p>
<p>This means your threats are usually difficult to enforce, can be seen as a waste of court&#8217;s time for the infitecimal degree of the infringement and will often be a waste of time if consumers are tech-savvy and know your limitations (compared to your over-exaggerated claims of authority&#8230; such as is typical with DCAs)</p>
<p>ACS:Law, you&#8217;ll temporarily ruin a few people&#8217;s lives, scare others senseless and harass many more, all based on scant evidence&#8230; </p>
<p>You&#8217;re not doing it for right vs wrong&#8230; nor to protect anyone&#8230; you&#8217;re doing it for one thing and one thing only&#8230; MAFIAA money.</p>
<p>ACS:Law, there is no doubt&#8230;</p>
<p>you are wankers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IANAL</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-649036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IANAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-649036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have hoped that the so-called lawyers at this so-called law firm would know that you can&#039;t sue someone for defamation if they call you a bad name. So I can, for example, quite safely say that ACS Law are gigantic wanky cunts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have hoped that the so-called lawyers at this so-called law firm would know that you can&#8217;t sue someone for defamation if they call you a bad name. So I can, for example, quite safely say that ACS Law are gigantic wanky cunts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanity_Vocal</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-648903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanity_Vocal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 03:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-648903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone issued with an anit-piracy lawsuit by them? Why not counter slap them with Fraud, defamation and harrassment charges in court? As proof, emails sent to victims, ISPs of victims, and the posts/letters sent to victims?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone issued with an anit-piracy lawsuit by them? Why not counter slap them with Fraud, defamation and harrassment charges in court? As proof, emails sent to victims, ISPs of victims, and the posts/letters sent to victims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwishare</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-648872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kiwishare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-648872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terence Tsang IS a POLE SMOKING PAEDOPHILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!


SUE DUMBASSES!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terence Tsang IS a POLE SMOKING PAEDOPHILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>SUE DUMBASSES!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 24/3/2010: Linux 2.6.34 Preview, Parted Magic 4.9 is Here &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-648753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links 24/3/2010: Linux 2.6.34 Preview, Parted Magic 4.9 is Here &#124; Boycott Novell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-648753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] UK Anti-Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum ACS:Law have been making news headlines damaging to their reputation ever since they started sending out thousands of threatening letters to alleged file-sharers in the UK. Now they are threatening to sue Slyck.com, one of the Internet’s oldest file-sharing forums, because they don’t like what members have written about them. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UK Anti-Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum ACS:Law have been making news headlines damaging to their reputation ever since they started sending out thousands of threatening letters to alleged file-sharers in the UK. Now they are threatening to sue Slyck.com, one of the Internet’s oldest file-sharing forums, because they don’t like what members have written about them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-648713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-648713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*sigh*

its 2010 and we still have morons that dont understand the internet..

you would think this would stop after a while.. 

ACS:LAW please kill yourselves, your wasting oxygen. k thnx bai]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*</p>
<p>its 2010 and we still have morons that dont understand the internet..</p>
<p>you would think this would stop after a while.. </p>
<p>ACS:LAW please kill yourselves, your wasting oxygen. k thnx bai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOLlvcxlvdllbvd</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-648709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LOLlvcxlvdllbvd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-648709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In order to be defamatory, a statement has to claim to be a fact instead of an opinion. For example, saying, &quot;Mr. Jones is mean&quot; cannot be defamatory, because it is someone&#039;s opinion. However, if someone says, &quot;Mr. Jones steals candy from children&quot;, then the statement is defamatory if it is not true, because it would be a fact, not an opinion.&quot;

^Wikipedia

IMO calling ACS:Law &quot;a bunch of wankers&quot; is an opinion, is it not?

Or are they saying that they never masturbate? Are they freaks or something?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In order to be defamatory, a statement has to claim to be a fact instead of an opinion. For example, saying, &#8220;Mr. Jones is mean&#8221; cannot be defamatory, because it is someone&#8217;s opinion. However, if someone says, &#8220;Mr. Jones steals candy from children&#8221;, then the statement is defamatory if it is not true, because it would be a fact, not an opinion.&#8221;</p>
<p>^Wikipedia</p>
<p>IMO calling ACS:Law &#8220;a bunch of wankers&#8221; is an opinion, is it not?</p>
<p>Or are they saying that they never masturbate? Are they freaks or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solinkable.com</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-648467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[solinkable.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-648467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;UK Anti-Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum...&lt;/strong&gt;

ACS:Law have been making news headlines damaging to their reputation ever since they started sending out thousands of threatening letters to alleged file-sharers in the UK. Now they are threatening to sue Slyck.com, one of the Internet’s oldest file-...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UK Anti-Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ACS:Law have been making news headlines damaging to their reputation ever since they started sending out thousands of threatening letters to alleged file-sharers in the UK. Now they are threatening to sue Slyck.com, one of the Internet’s oldest file-&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2010-03-23 &#171; Onlinejournalismtest&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>/uk-anti-piracy-lawyers-threaten-file-sharing-forum-100322/#comment-648411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[links for 2010-03-23 &#171; Onlinejournalismtest&#39;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=22503#comment-648411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] UK Anti-Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum &#124; TorrentFreak RT @helpmeinvestig8: #Libel #law used to gag again: UK Anti-#Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UK Anti-Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum | TorrentFreak RT @helpmeinvestig8: #Libel #law used to gag again: UK Anti-#Piracy Lawyers Threaten File-Sharing Forum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
