<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Government Abandons File-Sharing Website Blocking Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; Torrents &#38; File Sharing News</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; Torrents &#38; File Sharing News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] series of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that’s now been taken out of consideration, nonetheless how most of that was down to legal proportionality and feasibility, and how most was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] series of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that’s now been taken out of consideration, nonetheless how most of that was down to legal proportionality and feasibility, and how most was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 06:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; p2p &#124; DigitFreak</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; p2p &#124; DigitFreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 06:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 22:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] series of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that’s now been taken out of consideration, nonetheless how most of that was down to legal proportionality and feasibility, and how most was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] series of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that’s now been taken out of consideration, nonetheless how most of that was down to legal proportionality and feasibility, and how most was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2PTalk &#187; Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P2PTalk &#187; Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; Links Daily</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; Links Daily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; We R Pirates</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; We R Pirates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-828317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Copyright Only For the Big Guys? &#124; TorrentFreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-828317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of accusations a website could have been taken offline. Thankfully, that&#8217;s now been taken out of consideration, but how much of that was down to judicial proportionality and feasibility, and how much was down [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lib Dems to Vote on Piracy Act Repeal &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-827603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lib Dems to Vote on Piracy Act Repeal &#124; TorrentFreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-827603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] restrictive laws. Proposals include strong network neutrality, pushing to implement aspects of the Hargreaves review that have yet to be tackled by the government, and repealing many aspects of the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] restrictive laws. Proposals include strong network neutrality, pushing to implement aspects of the Hargreaves review that have yet to be tackled by the government, and repealing many aspects of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ministerio de Cultura y realidades paralelas</title>
		<link>/uk-government-abandons-file-sharing-website-blocking-plans-110803/#comment-823773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ministerio de Cultura y realidades paralelas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=38346#comment-823773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] las medidas inmediatas anunciadas por el Gobierno británico está una en concreto: el abandono de los planes de bloqueo de páginas web. Las razones esgrimidas para ello no son ni más ni menos que las que llevamos defendiendo aquí [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] las medidas inmediatas anunciadas por el Gobierno británico está una en concreto: el abandono de los planes de bloqueo de páginas web. Las razones esgrimidas para ello no son ni más ni menos que las que llevamos defendiendo aquí [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
