Since, as i’ve said, there’s been no user civilly sued for using torrent at all, and only one user in total actually gone through court, and that’s goign to a retrial, no-one’s been prosecuted whilst using blocklists, in the US where the majority of these suits hapen.

However, as far as notices go, yes, lots of them. just 2 minutes on peerguardian’s forum got me this link, where someone has had 3, and there are others on there. Don’t bother looking on bluetack’s forum though, you can see them, if they’ve just been posted, but then they seem to mysteriously ‘vanish’ – strange that.

what u say?

marred only on a single point, i disagree with your position on blocklists. yours is a counsel of perfection. there is no anonymity for internet users and it works both ways. it is not a reason to abandon blocklists because the bluetack lists are not perfect, on the contrary, if the major issues are the completeness or accuracy of the lists then let’s work with that and find a solution. knowing the limitations of a system is part of understanding the system

the blocklists perform an important function and they do that well. they make it more difficult, more expensive, to fuk with p2p systems. if you asked the anti-p2p lobby which they would prefer they will answer “a world with no blocklists”

that is where your credentials as a spokesman for p2p are not good. criticism is all good but throwing the baby out of the window with the bath water is nonsense. the enemies of p2p are anti-blocklist

i prefer to block 64% of the internet than permit a single bad ip to access my system

You argue that blocklists slow you down and increase the time you are on the torrent, thus increasing the chance of being logged. You then argue against using private sites later on.
Just in case you are one of those who still believes TPB is faster than private sites, here’s a news flash:
Using TPB can increase the time you are downloading from minutes to days!