<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universal Music Moves For Summary Judgment Against Grooveshark</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tetridae</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tetridae]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IP filters won&#039;t work any longer if they start VPN:ing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IP filters won&#8217;t work any longer if they start VPN:ing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124;</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tetridae</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tetridae]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree... They behave exactly like that for any of the innovative ideas which don&#039;t leave any space for them to squeeze in and suck out teh money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230; They behave exactly like that for any of the innovative ideas which don&#8217;t leave any space for them to squeeze in and suck out teh money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albin</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports seem to be scrambling two special and limited cases against GS:  one about pre-1972 uploads, and one about music of any date put on the site by GS own officers and staff.  Neither really affects the core content of the service under &quot;YouTube for music files&quot; compliance with the DMCA takedown rules.  Attacking that would have huge consequences for YouTube and we&#039;d see Google&#039;s lawyers in there like thunder and lightening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reports seem to be scrambling two special and limited cases against GS:  one about pre-1972 uploads, and one about music of any date put on the site by GS own officers and staff.  Neither really affects the core content of the service under &#8220;YouTube for music files&#8221; compliance with the DMCA takedown rules.  Attacking that would have huge consequences for YouTube and we&#8217;d see Google&#8217;s lawyers in there like thunder and lightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Journal of Musical ThingsRandom Music News for Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - A Journal of Musical Things</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Journal of Musical ThingsRandom Music News for Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - A Journal of Musical Things]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Universal is moving in a lawsuit against [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Universal is moving in a lawsuit against [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; iikk.org</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; iikk.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; 8ii.in</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; 8ii.in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; LTTi.net Blog</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; LTTi.net Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case - OyebayOyebay</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case - OyebayOyebay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; TorrentFreak</title>
		<link>/universal-music-moves-for-summary-judgment-against-grooveshark-140929/#comment-1240687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labels Win Grooveshark Copyright Infringement Case &#124; TorrentFreak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=94539#comment-1240687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The fact that employees were uploading content became known to the labels following discovery in another case currently before the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
