<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: uTorrent Reaches Milestone With 2.0 Release</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:19:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-641049</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-641049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now my web browsing doesnt work 
Thanks

&quot;Address Not Found
www.google.com could not be found. Please check the name and try again.&quot;

&quot;Connection Interrupted
The document contains no data.&quot;

Back to good ol 1.6....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now my web browsing doesnt work<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>&#8220;Address Not Found<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com</a> could not be found. Please check the name and try again.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Connection Interrupted<br />
The document contains no data.&#8221;</p>
<p>Back to good ol 1.6&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: utorrent all the way</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-640723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[utorrent all the way]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-640723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[utorrent 2.0 is good for those with slower internet.
Those with 1MB(apx 8 mbit/s) or higher upload are much better with utorrent 1.8.5

2.0 version is quite naive in handshaking.

1.8.5 will be very generous with the generous peers.

With 1.8.5 I can upload my max 1MB while download 400-500 MB(or even more if there is a super generous peer) on an open tracker.

2.0 version sleeps, I hardly could upload 500kB/s while download 80-100 kB/s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>utorrent 2.0 is good for those with slower internet.<br />
Those with 1MB(apx 8 mbit/s) or higher upload are much better with utorrent 1.8.5</p>
<p>2.0 version is quite naive in handshaking.</p>
<p>1.8.5 will be very generous with the generous peers.</p>
<p>With 1.8.5 I can upload my max 1MB while download 400-500 MB(or even more if there is a super generous peer) on an open tracker.</p>
<p>2.0 version sleeps, I hardly could upload 500kB/s while download 80-100 kB/s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTPH Software: Blog : WrapUp: Mozilla Confirms 2 Infected Extensions, Stream Your Favorite TV Shows, and More :</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-640460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTPH Software: Blog : WrapUp: Mozilla Confirms 2 Infected Extensions, Stream Your Favorite TV Shows, and More :]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 07:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-640460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] uTorrent 2.0 Released uTorrent 2.0 is now available, and has a strong focus on better network performance. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uTorrent 2.0 Released uTorrent 2.0 is now available, and has a strong focus on better network performance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-640184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-640184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mass adding more than 5 files manually in 2.0 or 2.1 beta means everything gets thrown in the default folder rather than allowing you to choose the location for each file individually.

They say this is because of stability issues and will up this to 20 at a time in later builds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mass adding more than 5 files manually in 2.0 or 2.1 beta means everything gets thrown in the default folder rather than allowing you to choose the location for each file individually.</p>
<p>They say this is because of stability issues and will up this to 20 at a time in later builds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate Home Page &#187; uTorrent Reaches Milestone With 2.0 Release</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-639515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pirate Home Page &#187; uTorrent Reaches Milestone With 2.0 Release]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-639515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] uTorrent for Windows saw its first public release in September 2005 and soon became the most widely used BitTorrent applications. The client is used by more than 50 million users worldwide and this number continues to rise. Read More : uTorrent Reaches Milestone With 2.0 Release [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] uTorrent for Windows saw its first public release in September 2005 and soon became the most widely used BitTorrent applications. The client is used by more than 50 million users worldwide and this number continues to rise. Read More : uTorrent Reaches Milestone With 2.0 Release [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-639453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 05:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-639453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this sounds like UDP....is it?  Or just some new fancy abbreviation that resembles that of &quot;UDP&quot;?  lol.

But yea, this does sound good.  I know as a newb, I&#039;d turn on all the logging and see all the &quot;chattering&quot; - and yea, the bittorrent protocol sure is &quot;noisy&quot; - sending all these &quot;Hey I got this, Ok, nope, I don&#039;t need this, send me this piece, OK, go here for this piece, OK, this guy is choked, try this guy instead....&quot;

All consumes a lot of un-necessary bandwidth...

I honestly think these &quot;messages&quot; could be moved to UDP, and leave the file transfers to TCP (for the speed)....since I&#039;ve read UDP is not a &quot;guaranteed transfer&quot; - BUT, on the flip-side, UDP file transfer has a lower bandwidth footprint.

But it&#039;s kind of a &quot;shot in the dark&quot; - in UDP, your client says &quot;send this here&quot; but since UDP is extremely basic, there is no &quot;checking&quot; or &quot;verifying&quot; that the data actually made it to where it&#039;s supposed to be.

But, the badnwidth usage is a big plus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this sounds like UDP&#8230;.is it?  Or just some new fancy abbreviation that resembles that of &#8220;UDP&#8221;?  lol.</p>
<p>But yea, this does sound good.  I know as a newb, I&#8217;d turn on all the logging and see all the &#8220;chattering&#8221; &#8211; and yea, the bittorrent protocol sure is &#8220;noisy&#8221; &#8211; sending all these &#8220;Hey I got this, Ok, nope, I don&#8217;t need this, send me this piece, OK, go here for this piece, OK, this guy is choked, try this guy instead&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>All consumes a lot of un-necessary bandwidth&#8230;</p>
<p>I honestly think these &#8220;messages&#8221; could be moved to UDP, and leave the file transfers to TCP (for the speed)&#8230;.since I&#8217;ve read UDP is not a &#8220;guaranteed transfer&#8221; &#8211; BUT, on the flip-side, UDP file transfer has a lower bandwidth footprint.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s kind of a &#8220;shot in the dark&#8221; &#8211; in UDP, your client says &#8220;send this here&#8221; but since UDP is extremely basic, there is no &#8220;checking&#8221; or &#8220;verifying&#8221; that the data actually made it to where it&#8217;s supposed to be.</p>
<p>But, the badnwidth usage is a big plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-639296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-639296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do like some of the areas where Utor is going especially with the streaming option in 2.1 beta but it just doesn&#039;t seem to be working well with private trackers.  Any connection made over uTP just doesn&#039;t seem to be showing up in the announces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like some of the areas where Utor is going especially with the streaming option in 2.1 beta but it just doesn&#8217;t seem to be working well with private trackers.  Any connection made over uTP just doesn&#8217;t seem to be showing up in the announces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: na</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-639252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[na]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-639252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[µTorrent 
.. not uTorrent
... not youTorrent

µTP 
.. not uTP

its MICRO(µ) not YOU(u)!
big difference!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>µTorrent<br />
.. not uTorrent<br />
&#8230; not youTorrent</p>
<p>µTP<br />
.. not uTP</p>
<p>its MICRO(µ) not YOU(u)!<br />
big difference!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: networkguy</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-639204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[networkguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-639204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those saying no this will not work, I say you do not have a true understanding of network protocols. uTP is being optimized so that it is less chatty and creates less network overhead in turn. This will allow for the same great upload/download speeds and the ability to browse the net at the same time w/o seeing a speed decrease. If you don&#039;t believe try uT2.0 for yourself and browse the web, if you still don&#039;t believe after experiencing it compare wireshark logs with old uT and new uT. If you are still not convinced you are indeed a moron and should probobly go back to school.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those saying no this will not work, I say you do not have a true understanding of network protocols. uTP is being optimized so that it is less chatty and creates less network overhead in turn. This will allow for the same great upload/download speeds and the ability to browse the net at the same time w/o seeing a speed decrease. If you don&#8217;t believe try uT2.0 for yourself and browse the web, if you still don&#8217;t believe after experiencing it compare wireshark logs with old uT and new uT. If you are still not convinced you are indeed a moron and should probobly go back to school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esé</title>
		<link>/utorrent-reaches-milestone-with-2-0-release-100203/#comment-639114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[esé]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/?p=21234#comment-639114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m using 1.8.2 for some time now and it still looks good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m using 1.8.2 for some time now and it still looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
