Comments on: VPNs: Is it OK to Monitor ‘Bad’ Users on Ethical Grounds?

By: Anon

Anon — Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:24:00 +0000

I know EzyVPN doesn't use such unscrupulous monitoring methods! They don't log and are happy with torrents

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:51:00 +0000

The reason people use VPN’s in the first place is to escape censorship based on the ethical standards of the censoring party (aside from business reasons, of course). As soon as VPN services start to employ surveillance and/or cencorship based on what they consider acceptable and not, it renders the service pointless in my opinion. It transforms from a medium in which will safeguard your liberties, to just another hop in which you are subject to added surveillance on top of what you are subjected to from your own ISP.

By: Emeay

Emeay — Fri, 18 Oct 2013 04:49:00 +0000

This post is so interesting .so much information
here..Have a visit to see how people earn for their online jobs and work, you may like it .. http://nxy.in/hg812

By: wael koran

wael koran — Thu, 17 Oct 2013 05:15:00 +0000

PerfectVPN is a very bad service. PerfectVPN is thief money from their customers. It is not valid for all websites. They have very bad communication and they don’t have customers that’s why they thief money of any body subscribe with them.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 12 Oct 2013 23:48:00 +0000

Proxy.sh’s own TOS says they’ll do stuff like this.

By: Which VPN Service Providers Really Take Anonymity Seriously? | TorrentFreak

Which VPN Service Providers Really Take Anonymity Seriously? | TorrentFreak — Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:54:25 +0000

[…] log and share information we hold with a 3rd party is when our ethics tell us to do so (note: read this article for more details), that is precisely when activities such as child pornography or human rights […]

By: Which VPN Services That Your Anonymity Seriously? 2013 Edition | TorrentFreak

Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:53:16 +0000

[…] eventually share information we hold with a 3rd party is when our ethics tell us to do so (note: read this article for more details), that is precisely when activities such as child pornography or human rights […]

By: Anon

Anon — Sat, 12 Oct 2013 07:35:00 +0000

I call Godwin’s law. You lost.

By: jeff

jeff — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 08:42:00 +0000

If someone is being victimised and hurt then they are correct to get involved.

We all deserve our privacy from governments and corporations but that doesnt give you the right to ripp off or attack other private individuals.

A porn movie is vastly different from a cam taken without someones consent.

As for the privacy argument. I wouldnt buy a car without a test drive so why would I want to buy someones copyrighted movie without testing it first. If it wasnt so common for traillers to be so deceptive I wouldnt need to.

Personally I wouldnt want to a vpn that allowed individuals to be hurt and victimised by its users, but I would drop them like a hot coal the moment they started passing my info to goverments and corporations.

By: Guest

Guest — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 04:00:00 +0000

A VPN provider all care about is to make money. And it’s really really good money. No doubtfully they will hand over any data they have if they receive a court subpoena. All they will do is protect their asses, not your (like “Sell My Ass” service did).

But it’s no-no for a VPN to play a moral judge on their own. Imagine if ISPs do the same. If you watch too much porn, guided by ethics your ISP then would call the police and accuse you for being a pedophile or a sexual maniac ? Maybe even report you to your wife ? hahaha

I think proxysh has lost all credibility now. They are past now.