<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will BitTorrent Open Source uTorrent?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%C2%B5torrent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/</link>
	<description>Breaking File-sharing, Copyright and Privacy News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:38:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alt</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-209289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-209289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those seeking a true cross platform NOT based on java solution (lightweight), it&#039;s called Deluge, gtk based, works well on the 3 main OS&#039;es, I use it on them all. Supports uTorrent exchange, encryption, etc. URL: http://www.deluge-torrent.org/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those seeking a true cross platform NOT based on java solution (lightweight), it&#8217;s called Deluge, gtk based, works well on the 3 main OS&#8217;es, I use it on them all. Supports uTorrent exchange, encryption, etc. URL: <a href="http://www.deluge-torrent.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.deluge-torrent.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diktaytor456</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-137225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[diktaytor456]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-137225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ÂµTorrent is fine the way it is,it should stay a closed source]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ÂµTorrent is fine the way it is,it should stay a closed source</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZiRo</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-30589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZiRo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-30589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate commercialisation. Full Stop.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate commercialisation. Full Stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heliologue</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-29547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heliologue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-29547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KTorrent, like a lot of KDE apps, will probably make the jump to Win32 once KDE4 is released and all the requisite libraries are ported.  Amarok is going in the direction, I believe, and possibly K3b, if the tools that serve as its backend get ported as well.

I think we can expect that uTorrent will pretty much stagnate now:  Ludwig is no longer going to develop the client;  instead, employees at BitTorrent, Inc. will.  If anything declares their intent, it&#039;s this:  the great mind that made arguably the best torrent client &lt;em&gt;stops&lt;/em&gt; making it, and some chumps whose other offering&#8212;the reference client&#8212;is pathetic at best will do little but give it &quot;features,&quot; by which I mean commercial bloat.

It&#039;s like bait:  they&#039;ll offer uTorrent, but only their newly modified version of uTorrent.  Because it&#039;s closed source, users will have no option but to either find an old version or just take the new one + bloat.

There are plenty of projects that currently show a lot of promise, but none of them completely cross-platform and none of them with the same rapid development as uTorrent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KTorrent, like a lot of KDE apps, will probably make the jump to Win32 once KDE4 is released and all the requisite libraries are ported.  Amarok is going in the direction, I believe, and possibly K3b, if the tools that serve as its backend get ported as well.</p>
<p>I think we can expect that uTorrent will pretty much stagnate now:  Ludwig is no longer going to develop the client;  instead, employees at BitTorrent, Inc. will.  If anything declares their intent, it&#8217;s this:  the great mind that made arguably the best torrent client <em>stops</em> making it, and some chumps whose other offering&mdash;the reference client&mdash;is pathetic at best will do little but give it &#8220;features,&#8221; by which I mean commercial bloat.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like bait:  they&#8217;ll offer uTorrent, but only their newly modified version of uTorrent.  Because it&#8217;s closed source, users will have no option but to either find an old version or just take the new one + bloat.</p>
<p>There are plenty of projects that currently show a lot of promise, but none of them completely cross-platform and none of them with the same rapid development as uTorrent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yansky</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-29160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yansky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 08:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-29160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since Ktorrent is so similar to uTorrent (and is already open source), it would probably be easier for someone to just port Ktorrent to windows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Ktorrent is so similar to uTorrent (and is already open source), it would probably be easier for someone to just port Ktorrent to windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-28703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ernesto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 22:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-28703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[quote comment=&quot;28696&quot;]
Bittorrent previously stated that they want to develop a closed source version of their own client, presumably in order to implement IPS-based content cachching ...[/quote]

The &quot;Cache Discovery Protocol&quot; is &lt;a href=&quot;http://torrentfreak.com/cachelogic-and-bittorrent-introduce-cache-discovery-protocol/&quot;&gt;already implemented in the (open source) mainline client&lt;/a&gt;, and will probably be included in uTorrent as well. uTorrent will stay closed source, but I think this has more to do with ka-ching than caching.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="28696"]<br />
Bittorrent previously stated that they want to develop a closed source version of their own client, presumably in order to implement IPS-based content cachching &#8230;[/quote]</p>
<p>The &#8220;Cache Discovery Protocol&#8221; is <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/cachelogic-and-bittorrent-introduce-cache-discovery-protocol/">already implemented in the (open source) mainline client</a>, and will probably be included in uTorrent as well. uTorrent will stay closed source, but I think this has more to do with ka-ching than caching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beavis</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-28698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beavis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-28698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Janko-

Did you mean caching, or ka-ching? Either way.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janko-</p>
<p>Did you mean caching, or ka-ching? Either way&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janko</title>
		<link>/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-28696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torrentfreak.com/will-bittorrent-open-source-%c2%b5torrent/#comment-28696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s highly unlikely that Bittorrent will release the ÂµTorrent source code. Bittorrent previously stated that they want to develop a closed source version of their own client, presumably in order to implement IPS-based content cachching:

http://www.p2p-blog.com/item-165.html

And, yes, content caching is the one thing that Bram mentioned for the future of ÂµTorrent ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s highly unlikely that Bittorrent will release the ÂµTorrent source code. Bittorrent previously stated that they want to develop a closed source version of their own client, presumably in order to implement IPS-based content cachching:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.p2p-blog.com/item-165.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.p2p-blog.com/item-165.html</a></p>
<p>And, yes, content caching is the one thing that Bram mentioned for the future of ÂµTorrent &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
