Lady Gaga Earns Slightly More From Spotify Than Piracy
Piracy is without a doubt, truly evil. It doesn’t help the artists, it robs them of their rightful revenue and is such a poor basis for a business model, it’s unworthy of consideration. Of course, new streaming sites are miles better, offering a legal way to listen to free music. Hmm – Lady Gaga got a million plays on Spotify and earned $167.
In August, Swedish artist and composer Magnus Uggla launched a scathing attack on the owners of Spotify. After discovering that Sony BMG is a shareholder and receiving virtually no cash from his music being played there, he withdrew his tracks from the service and stormed away, declaring controversially: “I’d rather be raped by The Pirate Bay.”
Nevertheless, Uggla insisted that Spotify is a fantastic service with a great range of music to sample. However, he felt that the fact he wasn’t getting paid was the fault of the major labels involved in the project (Sony BMG bought 5.8% of Spotify for 2,935 Euros, Universal Music got 4.8% for 2,446 euros, Warner Music paid 1,957 Euros for 3.8% and EMI pocketed 1.9% for an investment of 980 Euros), claiming that he “earned as much in six months as a BUSKER could earn in a day.”
As the dust settled on the story, many non-Swedish readers were saying “Magnus who?” and wondering if this artist’s lack of mainstream popularity was the real reason behind him earning virtually nothing. But what about big artists? What about really, really big artists with huge international appeal. Say, an artist like Lady Gaga, who has sold more than 4 million albums and shifted in excess of 20 million paid digital downloads?
According to a report today, Lady Gaga’s track “Poker Face” was one of the most popular tracks during a five month period on Spotify and was played more than a million times. So how much money does she get paid by STIM (the Swedish Performing Rights Society) for this massive achievement?
SEK 1150 – that’s around $167 or roughly 113 Euros.
Commenting on the story, Douglas Léon, better known as Swedish rapper Dogge Doggelito, said he was dismayed.
“It is totally sick. We musicians have no rights, you may not charge [for music] anymore,” adding that Lady Gaga could’ve earned more driving an illegal taxi-cab.
Swedish artist, music producer and philosopher Alexander Bard, however, said that this payment was better than Lady Gaga would have achieved from her music being available via The Pirate Bay, noting that the amount was “…more than zero.”
Technically Bard is absolutely right, but let’s be honest – Lady Gaga would blow the money she earned from STIM in a 20 minute hotel mini-bar bender. Looking at the overall downloads, let’s face it, per track she earned pretty much near to nothing from both services.
While Spotify is to be commended for having the guts to try something new, for providing a truly wonderful service and for having achieved such a lot technically in a such a short space of time, one can’t help but wonder if it is ever going to bring in decent money for the artists.
After all, aren’t these the very people the music industry continually holds up as the important ones to encourage, nurture and support?
Lady Gaga’s example shows that Spotify’s business model needs some work, and the labels seem to agree on this. The US launch of the service has been delayed earlier this week, allegedly because of concerns about Spotify’s ability to upgrade free users to paid customers.
“We think Spotify is a great service but they’re going to have to convince us they can convert enough people from free to paid subscriptions to make it worth our while,” one label told the Financial Times. “As an ad-supported service the economics don’t work at all.”
Despite the startup troubles for Spotify the reviews from users, many of which were avid file-sharers, are still extremely positive. The service recently launched an iPhone app that allows users to play the tracks on the go, with or without an Internet connection, which many saw as the missing link. Now all they have to do is come up with a plan to actually make money.

Pingback: Lady Gaga Earns Slightly More From Spotify Than Piracy | TorrentFreak — Shopping Online by lakyo
Pingback: News roundup 22/11/09 « OPEN BYTES – cave quid dicis, quando, et cui.
Pingback: 1 million views on Spotify earns Lady Gaga $167
Pingback: How to Make a Shortwave Radio Antenna for Less Than $1.00 | Shortwave Ham Radio
Pingback: Why Music Is Broken – The Artist To Consumer Connection
Pingback: Lady Gaga earned $167 from 1 million plays via Spotify « Music Business Concepts
Pingback: Linkwertig: Apple, RealTime CrunchUp, Brizzly, Foursquare » netzwertig.com
Pingback: A Ga Ga approach to marketing? « The Naked Pheasant
Pingback: Spotify und die Verdienstmöglichkeiten für Musiker | myoon
Pingback: Spotify pays Lady Gaga $167 for 1 million plays | Electricpig
Pingback: ? Lady Gaga ?????? ?? ???? ?? ??? ??? ?? Spotify | Search Top Greek Blog
Pingback: torrents vs spotify | deninho.gr
Pingback: Low payout for Gaga from Spotify « Spotify news and technology progress by Fredrik Kjell
Pingback: Lesezeichen vom 23. November 2009 | PolkaRobot
Pingback: Spotify Isn’t Ripping Off Artists, The Labels Are - P2P Talk?
Pingback: Music Ally | Blog Archive » Spotify slaps down Lady Gaga royalties rumours
Pingback: HOW MUCH DO ARTISTS MAKE FROM SPOTIFY AND OTHER STREAMING SITES??
Pingback: SPOTIFY SLAPS DOWN ON LADY GAGA ROYALTIES RUMORS
Pingback: Spotify Isn’t Ripping Off Artists, The Labels Are | We R Pirates
Pingback: Thanks to Spotify Lady Gaga Can Buy a Keg! « The New Rockstar Philosophy
Pingback: Spotify Isn’t Ripping Off Artists, The Labels Are | InstantIdiocy
Pingback: Brief von Rasch Rechtsanw?lte Hamburg - Teil 2 - Seite 143 - netzwelt.de Forum
Pingback: Would Lady Gaga rather be Pirated than Spotted?
Pingback: Musicians—Money Is Not Motivation
Pingback: Musik 2.0: Lady Gaga, Lily Allen und die Generation Kostenlos | Basic Thinking Blog
Pingback: Spotify Isn’t Ripping Off Artists, The Labels Are @ blog.idtorrent.org
Pingback: ¿Cuánto gana Lady Gaga con Spotify? | Música Online 2.0
Pingback: His Master Voice* « La opción b