P2P Sites’ Injunctions Overturned, Anti-Piracy Group Fined

Written by enigmax on November 24, 2009 

Preliminary injunctions against two file-sharing portals have been overturned, paving the way for a re-opening. The sites’ lawyers have proven that hard drive evidence collected during a controversial raid against the sites’ admin is worthless, and the anti-piracy group involved has been fined by the court for acting in bad faith.

Earlier this year, TorrentFreak reported on computer science student, Juan Jose Carrasco Colonel. The 26 year-old resident of Bonar, Spain, ran two eD2K file-sharing link sites known as Elitelmula and Etmusica. Both were closed some months ago after action by music and anti-piracy group SGAE led to a court order being served on the sites’ host.

Then in May, Juan had a home visit from individuals who said they were from the court. Handing Juan documentation he didn’t understand, they gave the impression that they had a warrant to enter his home and make an inspection of his computers and hard drives.

In fact, it turned out one was a lawyer for SGAE, the second a SGAE computer expert and another a clerk, who had come looking for the stats from Elitemula and Etmusica, which supposedly reflected the downloads of music made via links on those sites between September and December 2007.

They searched the entire house, going through both Juan’s and family members’ possessions. Finally Juan managed to get lawyer David Bravo on the telephone who, along with Javier de la Cueva, were the legal team for P2P developer Pablo Soto. Bravo confirmed that the supposed warrant did not authorize the individuals to be in Juan’s house and ordered them to leave.

TorrentFreak has been in contact with Javier de la Cueva, who was able to give us an interesting update on the case.

A Spanish court, after initially submitting to requests by SGAE that both Etmusica and Elitemula should be closed and hard drives seized for evidence, has now revoked the decision after demands by Juan’s lawyers. The hard drive evidence was dismissed and both sites can now be reopened.

“The reason for reopening the websites is that a hyperlink, per se, does not violate intellectual property law,” Javier de la Cueva told TorrentFreak.

On the dismissal of the hard drive ‘evidence’, Javier explained that this was due to their proof that it is impossible for the site’s users’ sharing statistics to be stored in it.

“As I said in the hearing: how can it be that an interchange between a Polish and an
Argentinian would be registered in [Juan's] hard disk if not even a single bit passes through my client’s website? I explained to the judge how P2P networks function and he was convinced that this evidence is impossible and useless, so he annulled the previous resolution held by the same court.”

Javier also explained that it’s important to note that SGAE requested injunctions to be taken out on Etmusic and Elitemula without summoning their client.

“When this happens and injunctions are adopted, the defendant should have the opportunity of opposition, and this is what we have won,” he told us.

Furthermore, SGAE ‘forgot’ to tell the court that earlier criminal proceedings brought by PROMUSICAE to achieve preliminary injunctions against both sites, had already been dismissed.

Due to this unfortunate bout of amnesia, SGAE has been fined 500 Euros for ‘mala fides’ (operating in bad faith) as it was concluded that there was an intention to avoid the defendants right to a defense.

Previously:

Next:

59 Responses

1 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:03 by Pizza

Only 500 euro???

2 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:03 by hi

wheee

3 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:07 by TheSpark

Good news, but man …. 500 euro? This should have been a lot larger with jail time.

4 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:08 by Anon

Win!

5 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:10 by Anonymous

Should have been 50.000 euros

6 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:14 by Hom3r

500 Euros = $750

Better than nothing, but should have been larger.

7 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:22 by www.eZee.se

Great news! But like others have said… should have been a thousand times into what they have to pay.

Oh well, lets just concentrate on the good news and celebrate!

8 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:22 by Arb

better then nothing?? considering the low ass fine it might well been nothing.

9 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:24 by Me

If I were to enter another mans house unlawfully and attempt to take their posessions, I would probably get jailed and fined an extremely large sum of money. They get 500 Euro fine. What a joke…. can this seriously get any worse?

10 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:27 by asd

Paid 2 Watch Youtube Videos
bit.ly/5AvFd1

11 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:38 by kabuki0009

Justice is served ^_^

12 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:38 by SirReal

Wow, Anti P2P getting fined. 500 euros is nothing if not a start, but at least its that.

13 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:48 by Anonymous

If only they’d been fined for 500,000 euros for mala fides…

14 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:48 by Kamokow

Its nice to see that the Anti P2P people got fined. But I agree that 500 euros isnt much, but it is a start. :3

15 Nov 25, 2009 at 00:55 by Ridi

Cost of downloading 1 song from a torrent : $18,500 + lawyer fees

Cost of unlawful entry, theft of property ranging over $100.00,and operating in bad faith: $750.00

The reaction of pro-torrent people actually shocked by this: Priceless.

Seriously guys… lobbyists have corrupted these idiots. The fact that they even got fined must have gotten a few lobbyists fired from Sony and Warner.

16 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:15 by Phenom

only 500 euros?

Thats not a fine. How about the kind of fines “infringers” get?

17 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:18 by Anonymous

Wow, I think I’ll go to Spain and break into peoples houses and steal their music and movies. Seems to be the only way to get away with it now.

Not

Just more proof of the corruption of the court systems. Yes, its a victory, but lawyers make that kind of money in about two hours of stealing from their clients.

18 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:18 by Anonymous

I would of considered it a home invasion. But 750 is an hourly wage to those guys, I bet they laughed it up as they where walking out the door.

19 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:23 by Yo

This is probably just the beginning, since impersonating law enforcement in possession of a search warrant is serious offense with jail time involved.

20 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:24 by townie2

what about being charged with illegal trespassing? impersonating a Peace Officer? it seems to me, using a fake warrant to enter and search a home, is the same as pulling over a driver with a fake Police badge, and searching his car.

21 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:27 by Anonymous

I would sue the crap out of them if I were Juan. He should set up a donate link on his site for legal fees so people can help pay for his lawyers fees and then sue the sh!t out of them. I’ll donate $500 right now!

22 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:39 by Anonymous

The 500 Euros is the fine for mala fides, nothing to do with entering his house.

After having the revocation, now comes the fun part for the trespassing

23 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:51 by Anonymous

“Seriously guys… lobbyists have corrupted these idiots.”

Ya The enemies of our societies are these corporations of parasites. They must be destroyed executive by executive, investor by investor and brick by brick now before they finish destroying or societies and our justice system already seriously damaged by them.

24 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:52 by Juan Yung Guy

If these anti-piracy groups were in Indonesia they wouldn’t get fined, they would get whipped 500 times by the cane!!!!

25 Nov 25, 2009 at 01:59 by lol

$750 is pocket change for them. Should have been jail time, its where criminals like them belong.

26 Nov 25, 2009 at 02:11 by Anonymous

I wonder how they would fare in jail/prison? Oops, you dropped your soap!

27 Nov 25, 2009 at 03:17 by ptsick

what can we do with 500 Euros??
jesus

28 Nov 25, 2009 at 04:02 by anon2

like previously stated, this fine is a joke! should have been 5,000,000 euro just as a starter. to me this still shows that in the courts eyes the ‘alleged theft of a song’ is worth more than any rights a person has.

29 Nov 25, 2009 at 04:03 by vyvyan

Judge should have sent all three to jail for impersonation and fraud for no less than 5 years.

30 Nov 25, 2009 at 04:24 by gorehound

Great news except they should of been harder on those greedbag industry workers.

Boycott MPAA,RIAA,and their stooges.
Buy used movies instread of new.
Fuck Greedbag Industry !!!!

31 Nov 25, 2009 at 04:34 by Anonymous

Now it’s his turn to take them to court.

32 Nov 25, 2009 at 04:59 by Ccc

>> 29

I agreed with you . not only that , the lawyer will also lose his license .

look like the judge side with them

33 Nov 25, 2009 at 05:19 by Traum

5,000,000 is what I agreed and some jail time too but Mafia cant touched by law

34 Nov 25, 2009 at 06:23 by Bobe-On (The Limelight)

If I recall, The Pirate Bay caught some cops on videocam during the bust. But even if I recall incorrectly, I would advise setting up a live-to-secure-online-server/account camera system around your equipment and if something happens, post the images of the guys entering, searching and removing possessions to You Tube and elsewhere.
People behaving questionably HATE the limelight, being caught for all to see. What with the legal letters published, etc., that’s probably in part why TPB was so targeted.

I’m still waiting for industry names and even addresses too. Someone on here once said they have a list. Well, let’s put it out there.

35 Nov 25, 2009 at 06:27 by Anonymous

They should have been fined 5,000,000 EUR for mala fides.

The part about house trespassing is less clear. From what I’ve read in several sources, the search was semi-pseudo-quasi-legal. Poor Juan didn’t know how to react when he saw those gangsters knocking on his door. He allowed them to enter first & gave them the passwords. THEN he called his lawyer. Of course, the latter step should have been the first, and the invasion part would have been avoided.

36 Nov 25, 2009 at 06:29 by trustnoone

score at least one for us, for once

37 Nov 25, 2009 at 06:45 by Jew Lawyer

The Jew Lawyers piss out $500 euros worth of booze every time they use the bathroom.

What a nice way to rub our faces in the double standard.

Your worthless, stupid little goyim rights are worth much less than the Copyright Mafia’s valuable trademarks.

38 Nov 25, 2009 at 07:22 by mark

Damn these people stop going after the torrent site.

http://www.likemyscreenshot.com

39 Nov 25, 2009 at 08:02 by moktoza

I am really upset that they did not get jail time. Now I am going to download even more torrents.

40 Nov 25, 2009 at 08:02 by lol

It’s kind of funny when you see the anti piracy groups who are completely in the wrong both reasonedmind and neostyles STFU rofl.

41 Nov 25, 2009 at 09:34 by robert

what a joke they should have got put in jail. and raped

42 Nov 25, 2009 at 10:53 by Lothor The Evil

Well the evidence of how shady anti-piracy groups is growing larger. But as always, they just get a slap on the wrist.

43 Nov 25, 2009 at 11:10 by Brandon

Those pesky Anti-piracy goons at it again… Homey shouldn’t have answered the door. Problem solved…

44 Nov 25, 2009 at 11:25 by FactX

Great report TF!

45 Nov 25, 2009 at 11:39 by James Holdger

What the hell?

Companies act in mala fides and are fined just 500 Euro.

Users act in bona fides and are sentenced jail time and completed harassed by these companies and their bribed judges?

46 Nov 25, 2009 at 12:45 by William

If you download music, you will have to pay 5000 or however many dollars a song in fines.
If you illegally raid someone’s home and possesions in “bad faith”, you get a slap on a wrist and a fine of 500 euros.

I quite frankly am not getting this.

47 Nov 25, 2009 at 13:13 by lulz

The fine should have been 500.000 euro per accuse.

48 Nov 25, 2009 at 13:19 by The Old Codger

@37

Try and keep your racial slurs away from this site. It’s not wanted and just shows what a moron you are

49 Nov 25, 2009 at 16:16 by No-Name

It might only be 500€ but it’s still a big knock on the head to the MAFIAA, showing them that they can’t just ask people to bend over so they can rape them easily.
Hopefully it’s gonna open some eyes in other countries around the world about how P2P actually works.

50 Nov 25, 2009 at 16:18 by No-Name

Oh and how these companies actually works too.
gorgot to add that

51 Nov 25, 2009 at 18:31 by Someone

A judge listened to the defendant in a file sharing case? :o

Maybe not all hope is lost.

52 Nov 25, 2009 at 19:36 by diggerbick

so magnet links on BT sites should work out as well, since not a single byte of information passes through the site…

53 Nov 25, 2009 at 20:39 by RIAAtarded

how is it they weren’t charged for misrepresentation and impersonating an officer of the court plus if they lied on the dismissal of the original case how is that not abuse of process and only a 500$ fine. Generally penalties are levelled as a deterrent to doing it again 500$ is a joke. I hope this guy goes after them for damages for all the site downtime, legal bills etc. If they want pirates to pay for wrong doing they should be required to do so as well when they are wrong.

54 Nov 25, 2009 at 22:07 by Ninja

Wow, total ownage!

Next step: sue SGAE for trespassing and some other crimes (like pretending to be officials)…

Awesome.

55 Nov 26, 2009 at 02:49 by h33t

the MAFIAA are the real animals

56 Nov 26, 2009 at 13:47 by law is ANTICHRIST

thats awesome news… many of you think 500eu is too little… but actually its not the amount its the fact that the court agreed they operated in bad faith… making way for other cases to say hey these ppl have a record of acting in bad faith they need to prove what it is they are accusing ppl of.

if u get into a car accident and the other driver gets a fine and you dont it pretty much says the other drive is at fault.

57 Nov 27, 2009 at 08:57 by UGG

We have many beautiful down jacket and boots, I hope you will be happy to shopping http://www.uggnetshop.com

58 Nov 29, 2009 at 00:41 by Kickass_Sid

Actually he should sue them!

59 Dec 03, 2009 at 23:00 by Rugg

Really, when people show up at your door with a court-order, just ask if you can make a call first to the judge who ordered it. This is allowed here in Belgium. Also, if their are no police-officers with them you can just say you first want to see some police. So when they try to sue my website http://www.streamingtvsitcoms.com/ they will need to come with some real court-orders.

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.