Purdue University Launches P2P Network to Bypass RIAA

Written by Mike on April 15, 2008 

College students have always had the dubious distinction of being easy marks in the target against P2P file sharing. As of February 2007, the RIAA has dispatched thirteen new waves of litigation letters against U.S. University students in their ‘deterrence’ campaign aimed at more than 5,000 students. But one University is fighting back – albeit very quietly – and that’s Purdue.

Notoriously known for their aggressive pro-piracy stance and prolific file sharing, Purdue has never been one to fly under the RIAA radar. Perched at #2 on the all-time piracy “badass” list, they’re no strangers to RIAA’s threats, and students are continuously under attack in these personal litigation “waves”.

The RIAA threats are in large part due to the uncooperativeness of their Internet provider to assist in RIAA’s ‘nip it in the bud’ approach to thwarting music piracy at the school level. Not to be intimidated, however, Purdue has fired up their own P2P file-sharing “intranet” from behind the walls of their campus ISP. Dubbed ‘Dtella‘ (from DC + Gnutella).

A Purdue student wrote on the CollegeOTR.com blog: “Maybe Purdue can’t beat other schools’ music scenes, frat-house parties, hot girls, and what not, but at least we’ve got them beat in the piracy department. After all, we are the #2 school in music piracy as noted by the RIAA.”

The filesharing network accomplishes two things:

1. It alleviates ‘bandwidth capping’ commonly imposed on all traffic that leaves the University’s intranet. When a file sharing program is self-contained within the ISP itself, there are usually no limitations to how much data can be transferred, and users are free to share huge amounts of files at high speeds. Currently, Purdue uses Resnet as their ISP which limits the daily traffic to a modest 5GB.

2. Even more important, it keeps the P2P traffic off the Internet, which in turn is advantageous for keeping file transfers out of the prying eyes of the RIAA or other anti-piracy organizations.

There’s nothing new about campuses using their “intranet” to share files, although it is relatively uncommon for one to take it a step further by setting up their own secure P2P network. This is simply a response to the RIAA threats and the countless ruined lives through pointless RIAA litigation.

Previously: The Pirate Bay Demands Compensation for IFPI Block

Next: Hip-Hop Artist Refuses To Stand Against The Pirate Bay

116 Responses

1 Apr 15, 2008 at 23:26 by shmooo

twitter-based real-time pre feed:
http://twitter.com/pre_feed

2 Apr 15, 2008 at 23:33 by File sharer

It seems odd that shout about it though, but good for them!
I still wonder why musicians get to keep bing paid for their work when I only get paid once!

3 Apr 15, 2008 at 23:39 by Matine

Nice to know.

4 Apr 15, 2008 at 23:46 by Alex

[quote comment="347613"]It seems odd that shout about it though, but good for them!
I still wonder why musicians get to keep bing paid for their work when I only get paid once![/quote]

They Shouldn’t have made a site about it if they wanted it to be a secret.

Great idea btw

5 Apr 15, 2008 at 23:51 by WASTE User

This is nothing unusual. I know many schools that have private on-campus DC hubs.

There are also several schools that use networks such as WASTE that are harder to monitor and shut down.

6 Apr 15, 2008 at 23:54 by Rycon

I would love to be releasing stuff on that network, I would be so popular.. lol.

7 Apr 16, 2008 at 00:05 by Anonymous

so cool purdue is looking like a really good option, number 2 school in piracy! I may be transferring there

8 Apr 16, 2008 at 00:25 by geof

I thought basically every school had a DC++ hub…this is not news.

9 Apr 16, 2008 at 00:32 by Goose

I saw a post on What? that showed a url to a University-only tracker. It might’ve been Minnesota Uni or something. They blocked all IPs from it (it was a BT tracker) except from MU. Pretty cool.

10 Apr 16, 2008 at 00:38 by Janko

So there is a P2P that hasn’t been updated in over a year, a RIAA list that was compiled 14 months ago and a “recent” blog post from August … what is this, time travel appreciatiton day? :)

11 Apr 16, 2008 at 00:38 by Dash

[quote comment="347643"]I thought basically every school had a DC++ hub…this is not news.[/quote]

This is more than a DC++ hub

12 Apr 16, 2008 at 00:46 by Anonymous

owned
how about an intranet tracker for torrents

13 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:08 by Mordalfus

I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.

14 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:12 by Piajunka

[quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.

15 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:16 by Raadikal

Yes. This knowledge will do nothing but hurt your cause.

16 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:24 by Anonymous

[quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed

17 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:25 by Yosh

[quote comment="347619"]They Shouldn’t have made a site about it if they wanted it to be a secret.[/quote]

[quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

I agree with both comments. You were even asked polity to please not report on this during your research. Thanks for honoring those requests. Any press is bad press.

18 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:30 by JBourne

This article fails. Exposing p2p networks and titling your article “to bypass RIAA” not only defeats the purpose of a “silent” network, but challenges the RIAA to shut it down. Great work.

19 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:31 by Anonymous

[quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.

20 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:35 by Expose all campus p2p networks

Why do you pick one campus network to talk about? I think it’s only fair that you run a frontpage article for each of the hundreds of other schools with similar networks.

Once again, great job torrenfreak.

21 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:47 by whats yer favourite hobby sport

What seems to be the big deal here folks? With regards to the report here. If its all in house, surely (not shirely) theres no cause for litigation from the RIAA muppets. If there was cause, then ah suppose playing your music with the room door open is also a no-no!!Hell what about taking your fav cd to the guy/gal in the next room?
As the scousers would say “CALM DOWN LAD”

22 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:53 by Anonymous

The article is poorly worded and is challenging the RIAA to act upon Purdue. The author must have some reason to hate Purdue

23 Apr 16, 2008 at 01:57 by tachi

this is not the kind of publicity we need

24 Apr 16, 2008 at 02:38 by Anonymous

anoter epic fail article brought to you by TF

25 Apr 16, 2008 at 02:42 by huh

“I still wonder why musicians get to keep bing paid for their work when I only get paid once!”

They get paid ONCE, when you buy their album. That’s it.

26 Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48 by Anonymous

Yeh. THANKS.

27 Apr 16, 2008 at 02:49 by Anonymous

This article is filled with lies.

dtella is a gecko, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gehyra

28 Apr 16, 2008 at 02:52 by Anonymous

We’ve been keeping pretty quiet about this since Dtella came out. Why the hell did you take it upon yourselves to publicize it to hell? It’s on a public site so students can find it, not so torrenting sites can expose us and cause more RIAA problems than we already have. Thanks a lot.

29 Apr 16, 2008 at 03:09 by Anonymous

Highly inaccurate. Take this down both for the sake of journalistic integrity and to avoid screwing over dtella.

30 Apr 16, 2008 at 03:30 by zerodamage

Pretty damn amusing how these idiots are bitching about this article and how some secret was just revealed when the file sharing project is selling t-shirts with their name on it. http://wiki.dtella.org/wiki/Dtella:Shirt_Order

31 Apr 16, 2008 at 03:43 by Anonymous

Purdue is not responsible for Dtella.
The article also makes the assumption that what is shared is copyrighted material, which cannot be proven. Purdue does not monitor in-network traffic so there is nothing more than suspicion and hearsay on the RIAA’s side.

32 Apr 16, 2008 at 03:43 by Fatal1ty Wannabe

As a student at Purdue University, I would like you to consider taking this article down. Let us be!

33 Apr 16, 2008 at 03:50 by lolz

[quote comment="347764"]Pretty damn amusing how these idiots are bitching about this article and how some secret was just revealed when the file sharing project is selling t-shirts with their name on it. http://wiki.dtella.org/wiki/Dtella:Shirt_Order/quote
Aye, pretty stupid people waving it around, making merchandice then someone >>BLOGG<< about it and wow the “secret” is all exposed oh noez!1
If true its so stupid and idiotic it deserved to be “exposed”…..

Not Even Torrent Files!1

34 Apr 16, 2008 at 03:50 by Bob

Wow, what a d-bag. You just destroyed one of the best things about purdue. A network of true freedom and you shat on it.

35 Apr 16, 2008 at 03:52 by Anonymous

[quote comment="347787"][quote comment="347764"]Pretty damn amusing how these idiots are bitching about this article and how some secret was just revealed when the file sharing project is selling t-shirts with their name on it. http://wiki.dtella.org/wiki/Dtella:Shirt_Order/quote
Aye, pretty stupid people waving it around, making merchandice then someone >>BLOGG<< about it and wow the “secret” is all exposed oh noez!1
If true its so stupid and idiotic it deserved to be “exposed”…..

Not Even Torrent Files!1[/quote]

Because wearing shirts around a college campus (and the shirts dont say “We circumvent the RIAA” in giant letters) is equivalent to posting something on the internet for all to see

Go away torrentfreak

36 Apr 16, 2008 at 04:12 by PJ at Purdue

[quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

It is a student-run effort. The University is not a fan of Dtella and will shut down people’s Internet access if they eating up too much bandwidth while using Dtella… It happened to a guy in my hall here…

This article does really hurt the cause, and will force Purdue to do something about it… Thanks a lot TorrentFreak…

They really should also clarify who set up this client… It’s a complete untruth to say that the University set it up to get around the RIAA…

37 Apr 16, 2008 at 04:20 by PJ at Purdue

You said it best…

[quote comment="347788"]Wow, what a d-bag. You just destroyed one of the best things about purdue. A network of true freedom and you shat on it.[/quote]

38 Apr 16, 2008 at 04:22 by Anonymous

The inaccuracy of this article are appalling. If you are going to write an article and throw a group like this into the spotlight, at least know what you are talking about.

39 Apr 16, 2008 at 04:28 by Merkin

[quote comment="347608"]twitter-based real-time pre feed:
http://twitter.com/pre_feed/quote

#1 – the above guy is a fucktard.

#2 – C’mon, Mike – where’s your rebuttal? No? Thought not.

And for everyone else’s delectation, here’s Mike’s history on TF:

“Mike’s Latest Posts (See All 1)”

Fuckin’ n00bs…

40 Apr 16, 2008 at 04:31 by Monsignor Larville Jones M.D.

“Notoriously known for their aggressive pro-piracy stance and prolific file sharing, Purdue[...]”

PPOSTFU, ‘Mike’

41 Apr 16, 2008 at 04:38 by Anonymous

hrmm this is meant to be news? universities in Australia have been doing this for years?

42 Apr 16, 2008 at 04:43 by Mike

You should be studying anyway.

43 Apr 16, 2008 at 05:02 by Anonymous

You should be having a cock rammed up your ass anyway.

44 Apr 16, 2008 at 05:18 by anonymous

[quote comment="347838"]You should be having a cock rammed up your ass anyway.[/quote]

im sure he rams the cocks up there in his free time all by his wittle self

45 Apr 16, 2008 at 05:48 by Fooling ya

Kick ass.

46 Apr 16, 2008 at 05:50 by ZZZZzzZZZZ

Boring, WASTE has been around since 2003. We use it at our university and have for several years now.

47 Apr 16, 2008 at 05:59 by Anonymous

Except that WASTE has way more overhead than a DC based network does.

48 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:01 by Falafel Head

If the network is underground, it definitely shouldn’t be revealed; that’s not cool.

On the other hand, it sucks that we have to be so scared of the mafIAA that we can’t even talk about important projects.

The project was revealed; its a voluntary student-driven beta-test of a potential file sharing program to be utilized at the discretion of students; there is nothing wrong with that.

There is, however, something wrong with the internet being a filtered, censored wasteland where over and over corporate interests demonstrate their complete control over what information the public is allowed to have and what information the public is not allowed to have.

I am not a communist, and I do believe in supporting and PAYING the creators of any work which is worthy of being paid for; however, it is entirely plausible to do so and not sensor the internet. This is not the case.

Idealistically, not only is file-sharing a minor offense, it is completely insignificant a crime compared to the complete and total control of the internet by corporate and government interest; and any condemnation over “file-sharing” should IMMEDIATELY be over-ridden with the infinitely more important condemnation of COMPLETE control of every form of media by corporate and government interests!!!

Practically, a lot of universities run, err, internal networks; Purdue is not alone.
Lots of students share files and receive no long term effects.
File-sharing does not equal theft, and without an immoral invasion of privacy isn’t [okay, that was idealistic, sorry].
But, your University has stood up for you, especially in the past; that is rare! Thank them! Tactfully worded, but they are your best line of defense against these retarded mafIAA dinosaurs.

The RMDs are realizing they are failing: they’ve switched to DRM-free, cut contributions to pirate hunters, have lost court cases against defendents and their pirate-hunters are being kicked out of every state in America and Europe.

I hope you are not completely f*cked over; realize that the RMDs are taking damage year after year for screwing over customers; and we support you. Hey, maybe try out WASTE?

Peace.

49 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:07 by S

University of Toronto’s been doing this for years.

50 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:09 by Anonymous

Yeah go write a stupid article outing the University of Toronto, or all the Australian colleges, or any number that seem to want publicity, leave Purdue alone, they obviously didn’t appreciate this.

51 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:19 by Anonymous

Go Purdue! Great work guys!

52 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:20 by Internet

[quote comment="347885"]University of Toronto’s been doing this for years.[/quote]

Dtella doesn’t require a central DC Hub which is why it’s better. It’s completely decentralized.

53 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:40 by Anonymous

I dont see what the big deal is. If they have a web site, what is a little more traffic from people talking about it?

54 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:40 by eDigital

Good for Purdue, but this is not news to me the University of Victoria has has been running a hub for years!

55 Apr 16, 2008 at 06:45 by Anonymous

From their website it doesnt look like DTella is a hub though. It appears to be completely decentralized and has no need for a server to run it. Sounds pretty cool. I hope my school uses something like this.

56 Apr 16, 2008 at 07:06 by Putin 08

[quote comment="347788"]Wow, what a d-bag. You just destroyed one of the best things about purdue. A network of true freedom and you shat on it.[/quote]

Put down the crackpipe, son.

Dtella wasn’t a secret to begin with.

It’s power to bypass the RIAA doesn’t come from its existence going unknown, it comes from the fact that it’s a private fucking intranet. Whether or not it’s newsworthy, TorrentFreak ruined *jack shit* by writing an article about it.

Educate yourself, please.

57 Apr 16, 2008 at 08:35 by lol

some fucktard at RIAA has to enroll in Purdue now to crack some heads.

58 Apr 16, 2008 at 08:39 by John Singleton

Hell it’s no secret that people share music. I do. What’s your problem those knocking the article? Posting here also increases awareness. Did you ever think that it might encourage other schools to do the same thing, which would be good, and a helluva lot safer for all the poor students who are at risk of being done over by the thugs.

59 Apr 16, 2008 at 09:06 by Anonymous

This has nothing to do with torrents nor is it related to torrents, why is it here?

60 Apr 16, 2008 at 09:20 by David

We here at Carnegie Mellon also have dtella up an running, and have for quite a while. Other schools do to, and it is nothing new.
DC++ (with hubs) has been used in campus specific configurations for years before the distributed hub technique that the dtella daemon provides.

61 Apr 16, 2008 at 09:40 by Intercast

If you want to join a beta and get good quality and legal videos you can try out Kazam at http://www.kazam.com/ you’ll need to be in a university network which is multicast enabled. Purdue students should be able to receive content.

62 Apr 16, 2008 at 09:51 by Anonymous

[quote comment="347725"]anoter epic fail article brought to you by TF[/quote]

Then stop coming to TF to read the articles Tard :P

63 Apr 16, 2008 at 11:26 by boot2ben

Fight the power…………yeaaaaaaaaa

64 Apr 16, 2008 at 11:35 by Anonymous

I for one think this article is a good thing. It will let more colleges know about Purdue’s network and hopeflly we can modify their code to work at our school too

Way to go Purdue! Keep it up!

65 Apr 16, 2008 at 11:51 by Anonymous

heres hoping the RIAA break into the system then get sued for millions for hacking

66 Apr 16, 2008 at 11:55 by Child of 2008

“As of February 2007, the RIAA has…”

Do you mean as of Feb 2008?

67 Apr 16, 2008 at 12:44 by Anonymous

[quote comment="348023"]Posting here also increases awareness.[/quote]

and now thanks to this article the RIAA may be aware of this DC++ network and will begin to pressure Purdue to shut it down, I fail to see where this is a good thing…

68 Apr 16, 2008 at 13:27 by Anonymous

If the best thing about your university is the fucking file sharing, it’s time to transfer.

Also, file sharing over campus intranet = nothing new, so not news.

69 Apr 16, 2008 at 13:29 by Anonymous

[quote comment="348206"]If the best thing about your university is the fucking file sharing, it’s time to transfer.[/quote]

Also, apparantly I fail at quoting. That was to #35, Mr. “You just destroyed one of the best things about purdue.”

70 Apr 16, 2008 at 13:59 by Anonymous

“Also, file sharing over campus intranet = nothing new, so not news.”

This appears to not be your run of the mill campus file sharing network. It is completely serverless and supposedly cannot be shutdown (according to their site)

71 Apr 16, 2008 at 14:04 by BEN
72 Apr 16, 2008 at 14:19 by Jasper van Weerd

[quote comment="348071"][quote comment="347725"]anoter epic fail article brought to you by TF[/quote]

Then stop coming to TF to read the articles Tard :P[/quote]

Second that!

73 Apr 16, 2008 at 14:29 by Anonymous

Fighting back quietly != front page of TF, kthnx

74 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:00 by The Point

The dtella network is different from a typical DC++ hub in the fact that it relies on cached DNS records and peers that run the client rather than a static central server running DC++ server software. This is a big benefit when someone tries to shut you down. The only way to take out dtella by the looks of things would be to force the domain registrar to suspend the domain name.

Also, this is bad publicity for the campus I agree…but fir all of you dtella guys to reply with negative comments here…come on. A DC++ hub that discriminates against the free flow of information? Wow, what a paradox.

The best of luck to Purdue, dtella and similar networks at all other schools. If only this system could go global then maybe dtella would become a good replacement for standard DC++ servers. Too bad the developers don’t seem to want that.

75 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:13 by Anonymous

I have talked to one of the devs and he mentioned once that it could not become global because the latency or something would be too high?

Not sure if someone could fix that problem though.

76 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:29 by jack bauer

To the above. There is a public version of dtella i think. I read about it on digg a while back. it isnt the same guys but they cracked dtella and changed it so it creates a different network and anyone that installs it can run it. it was called fileshark i think but fileshark.com isnt the website and i cant find the installer any more.

77 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:32 by impossible

http://falseblue.com/fileshark/

that?

78 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:50 by Snipe

This is actually a spin off that was started about 5 years ago.

To be honest, I’m just disappointed that we aren’t #1…

79 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:50 by Anonymous

Quoting from TF’s article “Police Raid University, Dismantle P2P Network” (http://torrentfreak.com/police-raid-university-dismantle-p2p-network/):
“Officers dismantled the operation following claims of students trading large quantities of unauthorized music, films and software.”

You even report on shutting down networks after claims of file sharing, why do you go and make more claims public about other schools? After putting up such articles, you should be wary of shutting down or causing speculation about other networks.

80 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:51 by Anonymous

lol at “cracked dtella”

Did you notice that their site links to sourceforge where you can download the source for it?

81 Apr 16, 2008 at 15:54 by Anonymous

Fileshark cannot be a spin off from 5 years ago! Dtella has only been around for about a year now

82 Apr 16, 2008 at 17:06 by newbazor

actually all the guys on this hub are big fags with no life…they sit on it all day and talk about how they circle jerk each other while sweet talking the ONE female that occasionally comes onto the hub.

i mean the files are nice, but the people are total fags

83 Apr 16, 2008 at 17:16 by Satan Warriors

i am very happy to see change comming to the usa i hope ever one starts to get into sharing by p2p the riaa don’t have money sue all of america.

84 Apr 16, 2008 at 17:39 by lol

[quote comment="347625"]I would love to be releasing stuff on that network, I would be so popular.. lol.[/quote]

Im sure you would be so “popular” with the ladies.

85 Apr 16, 2008 at 18:20 by Ezzy Elliott

They should try http://www.dargens.com .
Its p2p, friend to friend, encrypted, fast and fun.

86 Apr 16, 2008 at 19:19 by Anonymous

this has got to be the most illinformed written article I’ve read in quite a while. Number one the University did not create this network. A collective of students created it to share files with each other without the worry of going over the then 2Gb limit on traffic.

This network was not formed around the litigations issued by the RIAA as you have made it out to be…”This is simply a response to the RIAA threats and the countless ruined lives through pointless RIAA litigation.”

If your going to post on a commonly visited blog at least put the effort in to getting your facts straight.

87 Apr 16, 2008 at 19:50 by Anonymous

lol @ 84

Sounds like someone got banned from the network.

Also, article is terribly inaccurate. Dtella was written long before the RIAA even knew Purdue was full of pirates. And because it is based on intranet transfer, which several people have already stated is nothting new, there is no reason to post an article here on torrentfreak about it. Yes it tries some new ideas, namely decentralization, and those should be spread to the public, but why name it? Why give the RIAA the incentive to come back and press harder? What you have done is expand awareness of dtella through killing it. You are just creating more martyrs for the cause. Its unnecessary and just makes you look bad.

88 Apr 16, 2008 at 23:01 by anonymous coward

[quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]
As a former Purdue student and always a pirate I endorse this article. Though it is revealing their is relatively nothing the Mafiaa can do. Besides do you people really believe they didn’t already know? This is just telling us that Purdue students are fighting the good fight. clap!clap! Boiler up!

89 Apr 16, 2008 at 23:42 by Anonymous

[quote comment="348686"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]
As a former Purdue student and always a pirate I endorse this article. Though it is revealing their is relatively nothing the Mafiaa can do. Besides do you people really believe they didn’t already know? This is just telling us that Purdue students are fighting the good fight. clap!clap! Boiler up![/quote]

*clap, clap* Boiler up!

90 Apr 17, 2008 at 02:33 by sharkitysharkshark

[quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever

91 Apr 17, 2008 at 04:03 by Anonymous

[quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain

92 Apr 17, 2008 at 04:05 by ccb056

[quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain

93 Apr 17, 2008 at 04:06 by Anonymous

[quote comment="348841"][quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain[/quote]

I CAN SEE FOREVER

94 Apr 17, 2008 at 04:07 by Anonymous

[quote comment="348841"][quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain[/quote]
[quote comment="348842"][quote comment="348841"][quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain[/quote]

I CAN SEE FOREVER[/quote]

You’ve seen the edge of the universe!

95 Apr 17, 2008 at 04:08 by Anonymous

[quote comment="348842"][quote comment="348841"][quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain[/quote]

I CAN SEE FOREVER[/quote]

I herd u liek mudkipz

96 Apr 17, 2008 at 04:40 by Anonymous

Please take this article down. It is not only grossly inaccurate, but it brings unwanted publicity.

97 Apr 17, 2008 at 04:58 by SEAKING

I love how randomly all the comments turn to hatred.

I am still very appreciative of your article.

And I doubt the RIAA checks Torrentfreak often…

98 Apr 17, 2008 at 08:13 by check-one

[quote comment="348844"][quote comment="348842"][quote comment="348841"][quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain[/quote]

I CAN SEE FOREVER[/quote]

I herd u liek mudkipz[/quote]
I agree completely.

99 Apr 17, 2008 at 08:40 by we keep it a secret

That’s nothing compared to what we have at the university of xXxXx
We have xXxXx all around campus that we can access with any xXxXx at any time from any place on the planet.
The hardware is all free, we got it all with a grant from xXxXx and they don’t even know!
We are linked to every xXxXx and get live feed from xXxXx and all other xXxXx as well. We even share this all with other xXxXx
So far we have well over xXxXx of media with no end in site. And we will never get caught because we keep it a secret.

100 Apr 17, 2008 at 12:45 by Steve

even if the students did set it up, i’m sure some of the staff knew what was going on anyway, probably some IT guy somewhere, or a teacher that overheard someone. the RIAA in general is gay, and shouldn’t even think to arrest anyone unless their selling it

101 Apr 17, 2008 at 15:54 by Bob

[quote comment="349008"][quote comment="348844"][quote comment="348842"][quote comment="348841"][quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain[/quote]

I CAN SEE FOREVER[/quote]

I herd u liek mudkipz[/quote]
I agree completely.[/quote]
Hmm, what comment shall I put in order to make this quote block longer…

102 Apr 17, 2008 at 19:29 by thenotsojollyroger

lol if you read from the top down you can see all the sheep who fell in line/digested and regurgitated opinion.
lmfao
whats with the knocking of TF?
they dont MAKE news, they publish it.
its just a slow day.
you want a new cnn or something?
go fuck yourself

103 Apr 17, 2008 at 19:33 by Anonymous

Sadly we don’t need to fuck ourselves, with the network now mentioned on places like Digg, Google News, and in popular blogs, the RIAA probably now is aware of it and its form and is going to begin pressuring Purdue to shut it down, so we have other things to worry about on one of your “slow news days”.

104 Apr 17, 2008 at 21:03 by superdude

It’s nice to share on a school network. Since it’s a LAN, it’s out of range for Mediasentry and others like it.
If the IrAA cronies do access the p2p network of a school’s PRIVATE network they can be charged with computer crimes themselves for unauthorized access.

105 Apr 17, 2008 at 22:38 by tachi

[quote comment="348866"]I love how randomly all the comments turn to hatred.

I am still very appreciative of your article.

And I doubt the RIAA checks Torrentfreak often…[/quote]

hatred isn’t the focus here. we would prefer not to get a lot of publicity outside of campus and the main problem is that the info in the article is grossly inaccurate. Though that in itself may lend it to not being looked at seriously too.

106 Apr 17, 2008 at 22:52 by ccb056

[quote comment="349333"][quote comment="349008"][quote comment="348844"][quote comment="348842"][quote comment="348841"][quote comment="348840"][quote comment="348792"][quote comment="347695"][quote comment="347686"][quote comment="347676"][quote comment="347672"]I doubt that Purdue set up the network, like the article says. This is likely little more than a student run effort. And now that it’s public knowledge, the university will be obligated to take measures against it. For a site that supports piracy, this one is really hurting the cause.[/quote]

Agreed. Take the article down and leave us alone.[/quote]

agreed[/quote]

Seconded.[/quote]

Thirded? or Fourthed…whatever[/quote]

It’s a chain[/quote]

your mom’s a chain[/quote]

I CAN SEE FOREVER[/quote]

I herd u liek mudkipz[/quote]
I agree completely.[/quote]
Hmm, what comment shall I put in order to make this quote block longer…[/quote]

omg, gogogogo!

107 Apr 17, 2008 at 22:58 by Dubya Doofus

[quote comment="348236"][/quote]

I fully agree.

108 Apr 17, 2008 at 22:59 by Tard SPNAKer!

[quote comment="348866"]

[...] And I doubt the RIAA checks Torrentfreak often…[/quote]

I doubt you have the capacity for independent thought, dumbfuck…

109 Apr 18, 2008 at 04:55 by Anonymous

[quote comment="349521"]lol if you read from the top down you can see all the sheep who fell in line/digested and regurgitated opinion.
lmfao
whats with the knocking of TF?
they dont MAKE news, they publish it.
its just a slow day.
you want a new cnn or something?
go fuck yourself[/quote]
there’s a difference in publishing facts and misinformation.

110 Apr 18, 2008 at 06:30 by Pv8man

That’s right, FIGHT THE POWER!!!

Purdue students are also the inventors of bubble gum flavored hydro weed. ;)

111 Apr 18, 2008 at 07:51 by prodigydancer

“Notoriously known for their aggressive pro-piracy stance and prolific file sharing”

Notoriously? I’d rather say ‘gloriously’.

That’s the way to go, Purdue!

(A message to students, complaining about the article):

Dear friends. I know it’s hard. There’s always a great temptation to stay underground until it’s completely safe. But times have changed and we need to gather all of the community and deliver the final blow.

Don’t look for a way which only seems easy. Don’t hide like if you’re criminals who you aren’t. Don’t make any compromises with your conscience.

You must not fear mafiAA, you must fight openly like others do now. You must force fat pigs to respect your inalienable right for informational freedom. Again I repeat: it’s hard. But it’s what has to be done. Better world never comes cheap.

112 Apr 18, 2008 at 20:11 by nice but no big deal

man got a 50tb 1000user+ hub running for years at this campus, even larger at some times. but good sheet purdue

113 Apr 20, 2008 at 01:56 by steveballmer

They should lose federal funding for this type junk!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com

114 Apr 20, 2008 at 05:36 by MrHowdy

The more people stand up and say NO!! then the harder it is for them to control you… The rotten greedy pricks can’t hold on forever if tell them to fuck off.

115 Apr 24, 2008 at 15:05 by Anonymous

[quote comment="350836"]man got a 50tb 1000user+ hub running for years at this campus, even larger at some times. but good sheet purdue[/quote]

dtella at this very moment has… 743 users, and 60.18TB. and that’s just logged in at the time, there are more users that don’t just sit on and veg all day, not to mention some of the users are on the IRC chat only and not sharing anything. so whose e-penis is bigger?

116 May 09, 2008 at 02:02 by blue

come on people I went to a small university of less than 5000 on campus people, and i ran a members only DC++ based network there. this is nothing new. anyway from what I can tell the ptokax based system we were using along with a few custom scripts were vastly superior to dtella. 4 years ago we had a total share of over 30 Tb, over 60% of the students were members (and some staff), and we had an average upload / download speed of 40 mb/s, and we also used an RSA based encryption system for security.

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.