TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Sony Hits Beyonce File-Sharer With $233,000 Damages Lawsuit

An important file-sharing prosecution has just taken another unexpected turn. The case, which is notable as the first ever to involve the monitoring and subsequent charging of a BitTorrent user in Sweden, centers around the pre-release leaking of a Beyonce album to The Pirate Bay. Now, in a parallel action brought by Sony Music Entertainment, the labels are seeking eye-watering damages of 1.5 million kronor, a cool $233,000.

Sweden has long been associated with the sharing of digital data, a position that was further underlined in the last decade by the creation of Piratbyran and The Pirate Bay.

Due to its connections with the world’s largest torrent site, one might expect that prosecutions of Swedish file-sharers would be focused on those using the popular protocol, but that hasn’t been the case. Difficulties with gathering evidence have seen the authorities focus on chasing down individuals using other sharing systems where proving large-scale infringement is much more straightforward.

Last year though, all that changed. In a first-of-its-kind case, electronic monitoring and evidence gathering carried out by DtecNet, the U.S. outfit behind the “six-strikes” scheme in the United States, led authorities to prosecute a BitTorrent user of The Pirate Bay.

The claim is that on June 8, 2011 a man from Gothenburg shared Beyonce’s album ’4′ in advance of its June 24 commercial release date. The case was made even more interesting following the revelation that the 47-year-old is a music industry worker.

The industry claims that pre-release leaks are the most damaging form of piracy, an opinion that judges have agreed with in the past. The end results are often heavy fines and even jail sentences which make these cases particularly useful in sending anti-piracy messages to file-sharers. There are signs are that Swedish authorities and Sony intend to make the very best of this case in that respect.

Prosecutor Henrik Rasmusson says that he believes that punishments in this criminal case will be heavy. Last week Sony announced that it would also be seeking damages in a parallel civil case.

In a submission to the Gothenburg District Court, Sony said that its business has been negatively affected by the leak on a number of fronts. The label says it has suffered damage to its marketing strategy, sales revenues and has also incurred additional costs. Sony adds that its relationship with Beyonce has been damaged and the artist’s reputation hurt.

For all of the above Sony say they will claim 1.5 million kronor from the man, which is roughly $233,000.

In a comment to Sveriges Radio, Marianne Levin, a professor of civil law at Stockholm University, said that she has doubts that damages can be fairly calculated.

Levin said that it is difficult to know exactly how many album sales had been lost to file-sharing. Since the album had not even been released at the time, no comparison with existing sales can be made.

“I think so far [the calculations on damages] have not been done in a satisfactory way in situations like this, and the question is whether it will ever be done,” says Levin.

“This is a nuisance from a copyright perspective. But it does not mean that you should have some kind of punitive damages to scare people,” she concludes.

And the proposed punitive damages aren’t going down well with the public either it seems. A poll of 280 people on news site Sydsvenska Dagbladet received the following response.

Reaction

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • john doe

    You swedes are angry? Remember that next time you vote then.

    • torrent freakster

      Several groups, all evil in their own way with promises that they will never keep.

      See anything i do not?
      Got any suggestions?

      Politics is just bad and should be replaced.

      • joexxx

        Do you have a vote of protest option in Sweden?

        • Random

          I’d think voting for the pirate party would be just that :P

        • bobmail

          200 people interested in the topic isn’t exactly a representative sample. You would probably get a similar result running the poll here too. Big deal.

        • djnforce9

          A poll here would likely be 99% being angry and the remaining 1% happy (which would include bobmail and his cronies).

        • bobmail

          Wow, can you introduce me to my cronies? I never knew I have cronies. Perhaps I need a social club that I can deny everyone access to as well.

        • TheScrote

          No, you’re the only one earning a dollar a post from a fascist organization. Number of actual people opposed to sharing who aren’t getting paid for it?

          0.

        • Trespass22

          You definitely need something, like a life. No one would spend this amount of time and energy on a site in which you are despised unless– (A) you are a paid troll, or (B) you have direct experience with living in your parents’s basement (which is what you tell all of us). LOL…

        • bobmail

          you clearly don’t understand. Why debate with people who agree with you? That’s like living in an echo chamber.

          Of course, I could invoke the 4chan theory: The lulz. It all comes to the same thing, some people here do provide some serious lulz.

        • That society

          Just wonder, why in USA when parents didn’t raise their kids very well, they just send them to their basements and why their kids send their parents to some asylum, when they don’t want to take care their parents or simply no longer want to live with them?

        • Boring Phil

          Perhaps he meant ‘cojones’, eh bob?

    • Trespass

      You think the Swedish people voted for this? No, Sweden was bullied and threatened with sanctions by the US if they didn’t start “gettin with the program”.

      • Guest321

        What use is a government that has no balls? US issues a threat and that’s a good enough reason to bend over?

        • Guest

          That’s how things on this planet work at the moment. If US complains, things happen. Tbh nothing a small country like Sweden can do, as the sanctions that the US can put on the country can be completely devastating.

        • Whatever

          They could always hide their planes in the forests again. (or was that Finland)

        • PelouzeTF

          If Sweden follow their past, like with their WW2 neutrality (assisting both allied and axis forces at the same time), they’d be helping pirates as well as corporations. Which seems to be the way its going right now. A double agent if you will ;)

        • guest123

          Welcome to New Zealand. While here, why not see John Key bending over for Hollywood?

        • Rush

          That’s how bullies (USA) live in this world,
          that happens till somebody stops them.

  • torrent freakster

    The “Sveriges Radio” link is bad

    Here’s the working one:
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=478&artikel=5459741

  • anonymous

    i would have thought that proof was needed to determine the damage to Sony, if any done at all and they cannot provide proof of what no one knows (more than likely that the album sold a lot more because of the free advertising and pre-listening!) it’s guess work but going by the way the Swedish court has acted in previous cases, making sure that they follow the demands of their masters from the USA, i am sure the damages will be astronomical, just like with Tenanbaum etc. the person who is accused of doing this will have his life totally ruined and probably end up being bankrupt. he will have tremendous difficulty in getting work and then probably lose whatever else he has in both family and possessions. funny how whatever damage is supposedly inflicted on companies and individuals through file sharing, none have ceased to trade and no one has ever been made destitute. i wonder why that is? cause there is virtually no damage inflicted!!

  • GreenPirate

    Why not $1 billion trillion? Did Dr. Evil calculate these damages?

    • http://twitter.com/MikeBale5 MikeBale

      what Rita replied I’m in shock that a mom able to profit $8606 in four weeks on the network.

    • http://twitter.com/MikeBale5 MikeBale

      …..—-goo.gl/ZkgiV (Home more information)

    • Filming

      They are fine with about $200.000,
      that’s enough for their weekend.

    • Anon

      They don’t have a precedence, unlike with 200k, and 200k is already nice profit for one weekend of work. Plus the chance to ruin someone’s life in that country.

  • joexxx

    There is no such things as lost sales.
    There is only failure to sell.
    Nobody is entitled to any amount of sales.

    • Guest

      “There is no such things as lost sales.”
      It’s even “possible lost sales”.
      What a completely ridiculous garbage.

    • Pelham123

      “The only person who should be punished is the person that disclosed proprietory information without permission of the company.”

      Exactly, perfectly right. And that is the only person they appear to be looking at punishing.

      • joexxx

        Maybe, maybe not. It’s not clear from the article.

    • http://twitter.com/x_rus_x Vitaliy Anonymous

      Load of trash. What if 100% of all that could have been a sale was pirated? That means it was something good, but people decided not to support the artist (I am in no way supporting Beyonce or RIAA). It easy to say for something like a digital purchase, but if someone steals a physical item, it is apparently called theft.

      • joexxx

        That’s a philosophical question, not a practical one.
        Artist gets payed by creating art, not by selling copies of art.
        Copies of art are not art.
        There is no theft here since nothing was taken from anybody.

        • http://twitter.com/x_rus_x Vitaliy Anonymous

          In that case, that means an artist would only be able to release only one single song. One mp3 file for $1,000,000 or however much they make from a single, and only allow one radio to play that one song, if a copy of art is not art.

        • Guest321

          You think a single mp3 is worth $1,000,000? Talk about an over inflated sense of entitlement. While the rest of the population is only entitled to minimum wage, somehow that doesn’t seem to apply to those working in the entertainment biz.

        • http://twitter.com/x_rus_x Vitaliy Anonymous

          I am rounding to how much they could make on a single. They made it to their status. Congratulations. Of course it sucks to get paid minimum. I am unemployed myself. But saying that artists shouldn’t get paid for a song, or that art cannot be reproduced (saying that there can only be one copy of a song) is drastic thinking.

        • bobmail

          Yes, but the selling of copies of art is the method by which the artist can avoid having to find a single sugar daddy to pay their bills, and instead to be able to allow many to share the joy of their work.

          Do you think we would have as many entertainment choices as we do today if everything was paid for by patrons and then given away as gifts? I doubt it.

  • Anon66

    If this guy provided the world with pre-release music then why not start a fund to help his court fee’s and any fine? I am sure many have benefited and would rather put a few dollars or kroner towards this than pay money to record companies charging extortionate fee’s for music.

  • salvagesalvage

    Poor Beyonce, from what I understand she has quit the music business because of the leak and is now destitute living in a trailer park. In fact the entire music business model has been shattered.

    WAY TO GO PIRATES!!

    • TheScrote

      lol what an untalented cunt she is.

      • Boring Phil

        Oh, I dunno. I’d happily book her for our bingo & social club if she was OK with doing a Tina Turner medley for the old fellas & didn’t mind getting changed in her van.

  • BeyonceisShe-Hulk

    Because Shera, miss incredible hulk needs all the money she can get for steroids, type in – [ Beyonce Hulk ] – into Google images for her Superbowl muscle pics Ha Ha !!

    • anon

      all grape apes are strong.

      • dsad232@dsf.com

        Shut up, retard.

      • Flag

        You must be proud of your life,
        well, all the lowlives like you always are.

  • Meekin

    Being as Sony never had the money in the first place (which they didn’t) then they haven’t lost the money at all. To lose something one must have had that something in the first place. So you can’t lose a sale if you never had that sale in the first place.

    • Bullshit

      I’ll steal your paycheck from your mailman. You never had it, so you never lost it.

      • dave’s_sock

        “Steal”, there is that idiotic word again, spouted by morons. If you “Steal” his paycheck then he doesn’t have a paycheck, does he. How many “Stole” Beyonce’s album ? None, she still has it, the studio still has the original, and the copyright. Sony never lost $230.000 because Sony never had a product ready to sell in the first place.

        It’s a bit like regional games/movies/music, if the product is not on sale in your country because of your region, then torrenting it is not losing someone a sale because there is no sale to be made in the first place.

        • Who

          “no sale to be made in the first place”
          actual profit loss is defined by the retail copy’s that are NOT sold. not by the one person that makes a copy of theirs and gives it to others.

          if say 20.000 copy’s are not sold and 50.000 copy’s are shared over the web, the web copy’s can’t be regarded as losses. only the 20.000 that was originally made by the corporation can be counted. but of course the entertainment industries get away with it the other way.

        • Joe

          Which can’t be proven as we don’t have Sam and Al going back in time to muck around with possible histories to compare with. Reasonably, they’re probably making a claim based on previous albums? Needless to say, 100m copies is not 100m lost sales – agree with you on that part.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        You mean you’ll make a copy of the envelope the mailman is carrying, pretend it’s a paycheck, and try to buy a house with it?

        Yea, you know, I smell another “anonymous” nickname just posting a rant because bobmail and Anon are busy trying to peddle their bull in another forum…

      • Guest321

        Pirates don’t steal, we only copy. You are free to copy his paycheck if you want. Unfortunately you won’t be able to cash it out.

      • Trespass22

        Terrible analogy. If you took my paycheck from the mailman, I could just ask for a duplicate from my employer. I would not lose anything. You on the other hand would be looking at some serious federal charges… LOL…

    • PelouzeTF

      Fine, I’ll copy your national insurance number/social security number.

      You’ll still have the number of course, so I’m sure you wont mind me selling it to someone far more nefarious or doing whatever the hell I like with it regardless of any potential impact to you.

      After all, that would only be considered copying right ?….you still have the number after all…..right ;)

  • Pingback: Sony Hits Beyonce File-Sharer With $233,000 Damages Lawsuit | Best Seedbox

  • geebus

    I love it when the companies try to pull sympathy, Beyonces rep has been hurt? Are they taking the micheal she will still hit No,1 on the top 40 and make more that most people make in there lifetime. If it where not for piracy she would not be where she is today same for alot of other artists.

  • Guest

    I think i mark myself in the category of “happy” about the prosecution. don’t get me wrong I’m all for sharing files but I also believe that they should be allowed to run their due coarse before they get absorbed by the collective. even if the entertainment industry is an evil giant they still deserve the rite to make some money other wise there is no reason to try and make any money, hence the sift to litigation business models.

    if there was one thing I would like our generation to learn its that instant gratification douse not include circumventing the release table, if something hasn’t been released anywhere or been out for an acceptable amount of time [to make money] then it should be off limits. This is the fine line between sharing and stealing because it [the album in question] didn’t have a chance to make a return for the artist involved. in the current model she still gets paid but that could change, especially if labels enforce the sales clause of contracts to keep them on their bill.

    its bad for business, its bad for sharing and most of all the industry doesn’t feel the need to accommodate sharing into its business model as everyone even their “customers” are literally out to get a piece of them for free.

    • Andrew me

      SO if this album sells better than her last one will the judge then award the defendant a nice reward for releasing it when he did.

      • Who

        nope. that cash will go to sony

    • Joe

      They run into the same issue with drawn por* in the webcomic business… Artist quits bothering because they’re getting no sales after the first 2 days.

  • bobmail

    ” eye-watering damages”

    Wow, you must have lead a sheltered life. In many places, that won’t even buy you a decent condo.

    More expensive than Mom’s Basement, perhaps?

    • veritas102

      Eeh. What kind of fucked up frame of reference is a condo? For me losing 10000 SEK ($1500) could be fairly eye-watering, because losing money sucks. Losing $233000 probably would create an emotional reaction in most people.

      For some reference $233000 will buy you a small apartment around the end stations of the subway network in Stockholm.

      • IDIOCRACY

        $233000 will buy you a huge farm with land in South Africa, it will buy you a decent row-house in the Netherlands, it will buy you a huge old house in the France Ardeche, it will buy you a small Hotel in Czechoslovakia, it will buy you a decent free standing house in Denmark on the countryside, same for Finland and Germany, it will buy you a huge apartment in Tallinn Estonia (just not in the center). So …. yes this is a big amount of money

        Oh almost forgot to say ..hi to bobby… hi bobby, awaken from your delusional trip yet??no?? go back to sleep then.

    • Guest

      Sounds like someone’s clearly living the high life. It’s only entitled jackasses like you who won’t even sneeze at the loss of millions.

      • bobmail

        Talk about over reaction. I am only pointing out that hyperbole like “eye watering” is not really needed here. It’s not eye watering. It’s pretty reasonable, considering that it was a leak of an unreleased album, not just a rip of something already on the market.

        I take it from your comments that you are living the low life. KD and instant noodles, I gather?

        • IDIOCRACY

          I happen to like the instant noodles yum yum shrimp chili, very much… so…and I actually loath caviar. So…

          Go back to sleep when you can’t say something normal bobby, 233K dollars for a action as described is out of every proportion. I for sure will never ever buy anything from sony ever again….oh I already never did after my last mechanical operated cassette player was stolen 25 years ago…. well ….you are not so funny this time Bobby…. what happend, did Anon not …. oh no that would be harsh to tell everyone here… Anyway you sound (from reading) like you just got fired by the RIAA

          guess doddy has your salary now too hehe

        • bobmail

          Yes, taking an unreleased work and giving it away for free (specifically being an initial seeder or sharer) is something that should be applauded and supported. It’s absolutely the right thing to do, to take something that clearly isn’t yours and fuck the owner over, giving it away.

          Yup.

          The rest of your post is about as idiotic as your handle. Grow up.

        • MadAsASnake

          Oh – so if it comes from the RIAA, it’s taken for granted that it’s eye watering and should stop making comment on it?

        • Anyone

          there was a study showing that albums that leaked before release sold better than those that didn’t

          so exactly what harm is there?
          “Oh no, he committed marketing without us having to pay for it, let’s sue him”

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      1,5 million SEK?

      The average annual income for the middle class in Sweden would be about 300,000 after taxes.

      So, assuming this person earns twice the amount of the average, it’s 2,5 years of income, in one go.

      “In many places, that won’t even buy you a decent condo.”

      And the reason people buy expensive housing in most places is because they are able to buy it through a loan. For this man I think it’s safe to say he’s looking at personal bankruptcy.

      Now, don’t get me wrong – pre-release means the man committed an act of intrusion and acquired information meant to be kept secret. There is no ethical cause to acquire and spread secrets here as would be were the matter whistleblowing, for instance.

      Needless to say, then, there is a case to be made for intrusion.

      However, the damages claimed are utter Bullshit. In this case we are looking at criminal misconduct and that means a criminal case, an amount of fines set by a judge, and jail time.

      And in a criminal case, damages awarded means someone has to prove actual harm. Sony are using conjured out-of-hat numbers they can not reliably predict in order to make a damage claim the accused can never fulfill.

    • MadAsASnake

      Someone copies a song and you think enough money to buy a hoose is fair compensation? Whatever you earn, it’s way too much.

  • Sony with Scientology

    Beyonce and Jay-Z are now in Scientology. Does that mean Sony is in bed with Scientology as well?

    • TheScrote

      Scientology=total morons, case closed.

      • Scientology likes Ideology

        Scientology should not be a closed case especially when they control and manipulate governments.

      • Gst

        Is this true? Source? lolz

    • 2013sUxAlright

      For real? -.- they can expect neither pity nor mercy then. FUCK ‘EM! And whoever took my name in previous posts. FU2

  • lawls

    I have never seen a chart like that

  • RinxTinx

    Unbelievable, and for a Beyonce album to boot? Scary.

    AnonProx.da.bz

  • AFriendlyDude

    “…music industry…”

    And here is the ultimative reason for all the problems concerning that modern day witch hunt.

    There can’t be an industry on top of music, or in other words: The industrialization of art is just ridiculous and a big capitalist fail.

    Isn’t it finally time to found a GNU like Free Music Foundation that advocates the creation and distribution of music and movies under a GNU GPL like license?

    Isn’t it also time to boycott anything related to proprietary software crap, including the download of closed source trash like .mp3 files? Ogg Vorbis is on your side and a great alternative.

    Isn’t it finally also time to stone all the idiots that are still supporting that greedy music industry with those cute looking ducks you can find in every bath tube?

  • JordanKratz

    DtecNet and that Mark Monitor need to be taken out to pasture !
    $230 Grand for Downloading pop-tart Beyonce.
    What a Waste ! Not Worth more than $0.230 .

    Fuck You MAFIAA A-Holes !

  • sharms

    It probably increased sales. Bunch of morons over in the entertainment industry, Keep wasting your money you morons. Instead of blaming the global economic recession on any losses, they blame file-sharing. which imo increases sales. Bunch of idiots over there. Now that we’re slowly coming out of recession they’ll attribute the increase to fighting file-sharers. It’s laughable.

  • Gues

    80% are ANGRY.
    take a hint Sony.

    • 7th_Guest

      Is the hint that there’s margin for further anger growth?

  • FF

    I smell tatics

    • ScrewEwe2

      I don’t like the smell of tatics, tetics, totics or tutics, but titics aren’t too bad. Much better than butics.

      • FF

        sorry, typo. I mean tactics.
        I’m not sure it is blackmailing. But it sure scare the artists to join their side.

        • ScrewEwe2

          I knew that’s what ya meant. i was just having a little fun. :-)

  • Truth

    Can a company be sued for trying to completely destroy the life of a human being ?

    • Corporations are entities

      Corporations now days like to be looked at as humans. So yes you can sue them, but the corporations have also created ways so they can’t be sued. good luck though.

    • Who

      yes they can be sued, but you must find something to sue them over. if they destroy a life by say the use of illegal drugs then YEP you sure as hell can. now as far as suing for something like this. you need to get a layer that actually goes by the law 100% and get a judge that isn’t paid off in favor of the RIAA.

    • PelouzeTF

      Let me get this right – a 47 year old music industry worker chooses to steal a pre-release copy of an album from his own workplace. He uploads it online (maybe for pats on the back, the lulz, because he has no friends and wants to be popular online, because he hates his job, because he’s a dimwit, because information wants to be free arrrgh) and without any thought for any consequence for those that invested their time and efforts into the product (whether anyone here likes Beyonce or not is inconsequential) there is always an effect.

      And he should just get a $5 fine right ?

      You guys are hilarious.

      • Charlie

        And you have a hell of a imagination . No one said that . Focus , man .

        • PelouzeTF

          My comment reflects the polar opposite of OP’s comment. A miniscule punishment and no deterrent (which everyone here would surely prefer) compared to OP’s over the top “completely ruin someones life”.

          If you can’t keep up, or don’t understand the obvious meanings behind posters comments, just say so.

          Focus, man.

    • Joe

      Well, considering that this seems more of a NDA-violation case than pure copyright infringement… Hey, is it possible to sue oneself? ;)

      Releasing an never-intended-to-be-published game is totally different than publishing a 0-day album that is planned to be released officially right afterwards.

    • Joe

      I’m saying “You do it yourself, just you. Nobody else…” for this poor SOB. Serious, shouldn’t be shocked that judges agreed with Sony. :( And this is from someone that thinks sharing decades-old music should be perfectly legal everywhere.

  • Guest

    Fuck beyonce.

    • Condome_off

      OK :) cant wait…….

      • joexxx

        Can’t wait for what? Clap?

    • TheScrote

      Good point. She could recover “lost sales” by winning a WHO HAS THE WORLD’S FATTEST ASS contest against J-lo and Kim Kardashian.

      • Charlie

        Must be white . smh .

  • aaaa

    who would even pay for her shitty pop music

  • godzilla

    We must follow Iceland – unite, structure and run according to rational or scientific principles in order to achieve desired results, and action.

    • Guestzilla

      Damn fucking right. Altho I haven’t heard of Iceland doing that.

  • J_Temperance

    Christ, he music fucking sucks. It’s not worth one dollar, let alone 233 million. My condolences.

  • Guest

    Since the data on filesharing shows that “we” buy more, they should be giving him money.

    I offer a solution to the leak too – release it soon er then. If it really depends on marketing all that much, its probably not that great, so then please… don’t release it, ever.

  • BRBREHUEUHEU

    Damn, why don’t you guys come to Brasil? As long as you don’t kill, mess with child or use drugs you’ll be fine…

  • BuddhaFacePalmed

    Wow, I guess Beyonce really needed that $233k huh? Probably a shopping trip from LA to Japan that went really bad cuz her husband found out.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      You know as well as everyone else Beyonce would have been lucky to see even a hundred bucks from those 233k, and certainly won’t see any of the eventual damages.

      After all, the important thing here is that the lawyers who take such pains get paid.

      • BuddhaFacePalmed

        Don’t forget Chris Dodd also needs another quarter million to build his gold toilet.

  • 1hhh1

    It’s only right that artists get paid.If you don’t want to pay go and borrow it from a library.

    • frozar

      Right is what we make it out to be. Right is power and right now, as a whole, pirates hold the true power and businesses trying to keep up. They fear the loss of their model.

      The milkman is dead yet we drink more milk than over.

      Focus on product.

      • 1hhh1

        Slowly but surely,the pirates are starting to lose.If you read the papers you’ll have read that it’s the intention of governments and internet companies to introduce a new legally binding clause into all their subscribers agreeing to pay for all downloads via debits to their banks using the banking info given when subscribing to a new internet service.If you don’t agree no internet connection.This is just the start of it.

        • Who

          that’s when the internet will die.

        • IDIOCRACY

          So how does that work when there is no money on the bank…
          And how does that work when banking information is not required..
          How does that work when the bank does not allow automatic withdraw…

          no…. nej, you should know better.

          But I understand this is your wet dream..

        • MadAsASnake

          Ahh – Bobmail. That will never happen. They can’t even detect the vast majority and the little they can detect they do so with the most appalling accuracy (and no actual evidence at all) that charging for it would be a travesty. The ISP TOS are not there to be raped by the RIAA – have another look at HADOPI in France, 3 Strike in NZ – they are abject failures at detecting people. US six strikes will fail – probably sooner rather than later, DEA in UK is dead in the water because it is impossible to implement and be consistent with legal principles. As for govts, just think about what happened to SOPA and PIPA. Any idiocy like this will go that way so fast the RIAA wouldn’t have time to blink.

          BTW, for all the shouting about success, “piracy” as you calls it continues unabated.

        • http://www.facebook.com/forkingham.melle Forkingham Melle

          papers are propaganda machines full of inked shite.

    • Who

      this was about sharing pre released content. chances are the library didn’t have it.

      • MadAsASnake

        Oh please, don’t use logic on these guys, never works…

    • MadAsASnake

      Don’t think this has much to do with Beyonce being paid.

    • http://www.facebook.com/forkingham.melle Forkingham Melle

      ok after i burn my own copy, i’ll do it just that to shut you up

    • joexxx

      Artists gets payed for his/her work. Which is producing art.
      Selling copies of art is not art and has nothing to do with the work of the artist.

  • frozar

    BEYONCÉ IS ANGRY!

    (ITT Beyonce shoops, go.)

    • She looks EXCITED.

      She will kill you with the muscles between her legs. lmfao

      • http://www.facebook.com/forkingham.melle Forkingham Melle

        please yes

    • ScrewEwe2

      Looks like she’s been hanging with The Hulk.

  • The_Strawbear

    It’s a shame that they pick artists like Beyonce for these cases, multimillionaires who illicit no sympathy from most people when it comes to lost sales. They really have no clue when it comes to this, do they?

    As for ppl claiming no sales were lost, that’s just stupid. Clearly some people didn’t bother buying it as they had the pre-release, probably not many, but there will be some. Why are so many people so dogmatic on both sides of this debate?

    To declare absolutes is usually stupid.
    And most people are greedy.

    • Anyone

      I’ll repeat it for you as well
      there was a scientific study showing that albums that leaked sold better than those that didn’t

  • The_Strawbear

    Here’s an idea:

    Would anyone (more musically inclined than I) be willing to make a charity record for Beyonce, release it for sale and very publicly donate the proceeds to her?

    The girl’s clearly suffering from lack o’ cash right now.

  • Milen

    So what does Beyonce think about that? Or is it not her music anymore?

    • Does she?

      She owns a small percentage of her own music. So what does that tell you?

      • Is she?

        she’s a whore (?)

  • dondilly

    While the amount claimed is way over the top, relevant facts are missing.
    Is there any admition of guilt by the suspect and if so, exactly what capacity.is he the original source of the leaked cd (be it a pre release copy distributed to radio stations or a copy of a retail copy from bonded stores somewhere in the distribution chain prior to release).

    Is he accused of being the primary release point to the public.
    As TPB dont release their logs, what if anything ties him to the initial torrent posting. Even if a seeder, the original seeder may be long gone.
    Is he just the only one of many seeders (ie just completed download) within the jurisdiction of the corrupt swedish courts.

    • MadAsASnake

      I was thinking something similar – have they got more than an IP? Did they get a bunch and just happen to see a music company employee in there? If it’s Mark Monitor, you can bet they have little more than an IP. Or has someone actually done a real investigation and got some real evidence, or like you suggest, a confession.

      • Joe

        The engineer in me is hoping the defendant got caught by watermarks, but the lawyer in me is suspecting just an embarrassing IP address.

  • TheScrote

    The only thing more pathetic than downloading a “Beyonce” record is uploading it. What total shite. On totally unrelated topic, anyone should be free to upload/download anything without criminal penalty.

    Beyonce sucks. Bad. That’s my main point. So does the “Top Ten” pirated list. But all should be free to share as much unadulterated shite as possible.

  • meyer

    From Geohot times I boycott Sony – I don’t buy absolutely nothing from them. Not even a watch (I don’t know If they sell watches or not but I’m just trying to make my point). I think this is the most safe, sane, and effective form of a protest against corporation. Don’t complain here – if you’re angry just don’t give them your money. PS4 is coming and of course most people will complain about copy protection issues etc. Yet still they are going to buy the thing. This way they will tell Sony that what the company is doing is actually ok. So that PS5 will be DRMed beyond imagination and to play it you’ll have to register with your blood type, iris, fingerprints, parents, pets and much else. I don’t get it. If you don’t like this – react instead of complaining.

  • Pingback: Sony seeks $233,000 from Beyonce’s file-sharer | Technology news

  • Pelham123

    OK, before everybody flies off and the trolls lick the peanut butter … this is a case involving an advance leak of an album by somebody who works at the company. It’s not about file-sharing or downloading and it actually does involve a kind of IP theft.

    95 percent of all leaks are official. I guess this one was not.

    TF likes to write these stories to make it sounds like someone is “cracking down on torrenting.” That is not what’s going on here. The issue is not damage from file-sharing, it’s damage from corporate sabotage.

    • joexxx

      Excellent point.

  • Byte

    What is really unbelieable is that the poll question was worded like that. I would have expected questions like “Sharing of albums weeks before they are released is wrong” or generalisms like that. Specifically asking about the punitive damages is a first for a big ‘mainstream media’ website.

  • illuminati

    shes a illuminati sell out
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnYLzcjTCe0

    • UraPhake

      Oh for cripe’s sake!

      I could come up with the same kind of nonsense using an old Busby Berkeley musical.

      Look — there are fairy tales and there are conspiracy theories. This kind of crap just combines the two. Any sort of credibility that these things have is BECAUSE PEOPLE BUY INTO IT in the same way they do with ghost stories and religious-based hoo-hah.

      Did you know there isn’t any such word as “gullible?” Don’t believe me, then look into a dictionary and see for yourself.

  • illuminati
  • illuminati killer

    shes a illuminati sell out

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnYLzcjTCe0

  • http://www.facebook.com/forkingham.melle Forkingham Melle

    i would prefer to jump her bones, probably cost less too!

    • joexxx

      Make sure you have good health insurance.

  • Guest

    Those 11% are clearly MAFIAA employees.

  • Wormlore

    I really like the reasons for the claims of damages.
    - “damage to marketing strategy”, I agree, but the strategy is severely outdated anyway. The most damaging party to their marketing strategies are the guys that plan them. “Pirates” also play a part, but nowhere as much as Sony itself does.
    - “… sales revenues”, can be. Let them debate this in court.
    - “.. and has also incurred additional costs.” I’m curious there. What “additional costs” are there because of things you never distributed? Investigation maybe? If so, I assume we can consider them as damages.
    - “Sony adds that its relationship with Beyonce has been damaged” this might be if Beyonce expected Sony to see to it that she would not be pirated. Let’s assume so for now, the best part comes last…
    - “… and the artist’s reputation hurt.” Now I’m clearly dumbfounded. When has an artist’s reputation been damaged by piracy? Other than when he/she sues the fans, I mean. Clearly this is ridiculous.

  • wargamer1969

    Too hell with her and her ugly ass big lipped Jay Z loser bf. Both huge Obama supporters too. Waste of time and space.

  • Guest

    Please don’t pirate her music, she won’t beable to afford her special shoes. http://imgur.com/6ykwyp0

  • Pingback: Svezia, guerra alla talpa di Beyonce’ | infropy - information entropy

  • Pingback: Sony processa funcionário da indústria musical em 230 mil dólares por piratear álbum de Beyoncé | Livre Navegar

  • Mr_Joseph

    FUCK MODERN MUSIC & MOVIES !!! it Suck HARD !
    I am only downloading the best things made which are from the 80s, so I don’t make any damage to your profits USA !
    So let me listen to my downloaded FLAC music or KISS MY ASS !

  • Pingback: Denunciado por 200.000 dólares por filtrar ’4′ de Beyoncé | jenesaispop.com

  • Pingback: Svezia, guerra alla talpa di Beyonce’ | SudTv Network

  • Nasty

    No more Sony for me!

  • Pingback: BEYONCÉ EXCLUSIVE // NEWS | More Details On Sony Music Suing Beyoncé’s ’4′ Leaker

  • Pingback: Sony Sues Sweden Man For Leaking Beyoncé Album | Music News | Zumic

  • Pingback: Sony Sue Swedish Fan $233,000 For Leaking Beyonce’s Album Early - Music News, Reviews, Interviews and Culture - Music Feeds

  • Foff

    Do the swedes have anything better to do then chase pirates. Does this country actually have life?

  • Guest

    Shouldnt they be required to prove actual losses?

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p0120a5509de8970c ミッコ

    Jail in Sweden is like a hotel with three meals per day and a lot of entertainment like cable tv and internet

  • Pingback: Beyoncé et Sony Music réclament 233 000 $ à un internaute

  • Pingback: Sony Sues Swedish Man For Leaking Beyonce's New Album

  • Pingback: Suecia: podrían multar a pirata de Beyoncé en USD $233 mil

  • Pingback: Beyonce Leak: Sony Sues Man Who Pirated ’4′ For $233,000 | Go to News!

  • Pingback: ¿Cuánto filtrar un álbum de Beyonce puede costar - | Indagadores |Seguridad informatica |Seguridad en internet

  • Pingback: How Much Leaking A Beyonce Album Can Cost You | PickStuff

  • http://www.facebook.com/tomlee80 Tom Lee

    Hmm I’m a big music fan and also a supporter of sharing. If I like an album or artist shared to me I regularly purchase that said album or song. I think an employee leaking the album pre-released is poor show. But as I say freedom is freedom, so I choose to wait until it comes out legally and complete before I download for free and decide if I choose to buy. If you don’t like what people share, then just don’t download fucker!

  • Pingback: How Much Leaking A Beyonce Album Can Cost You | Hot News

  • Obama_Is_A_Street_Nigger

    This is why we need less anonymity. If someone was forced to log in with their facebook to that torrent site to download or upload these pirated materials, they would be less likely to do it.
    Again this is exactly why an agreement such as SOPA was enacted. I think they will get it figured out eventually though.

  • invisiblebastard

    Stop listening to shit music and you won’t be sued out the ass.

  • Pingback: Leaking Beyonce’s Album Could Cost One Man $233,000 | GossipOnThis.com

  • Pingback: YoungSity.com :: Hip Hop News :: Sony Files $233K Lawsuit Against Swedish Man For Leaking Beyoncé’s 4 Album

  • Pingback: Leaking Beyonce’s Album Could Cost One Man $233,000 | A-selah

  • Pingback: Sony Files $233K Lawsuit Against Swedish Man For Leaking Beyoncé’s 4 Album The Real TakeOver

  • Pingback: Sony klaagt Zweed aan voor lekken album Beyonce

  • Pingback: Sony Music Menuntut Pria Asal Swedia Sebesar 233.000 Dollar Karena Telah Membajak Album "4" Beyonce

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.