TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

The Net vs. The Power of Narratives

The net changes the world’s power structures in a much more fundamental way than changing the way a few groups of entrepreneurs are able to make money. The net is the greatest equalizer that humankind has ever invented. It is either the greatest invention since the printing press, or the greatest invention since written language. The battles we see are not a result of loss of money; they are caused by a loss of the power of narratives.

Imagine if you were able to write all the world’s news for a week. You would have no bounds in what you wrote, and nobody would question your news – it would be accepted as unconditional truth. What would you write?

The people who sit on this kind of power hold the power of narrative. They hold the ability to literally dictate truth from lies. If you are able to determine and describe the problems that society must solve, and perhaps even how to solve them, you hold the greatest power of all.

Some people, when faced with this thought experiment, think in terms of affecting public opinion on some favorite issue. Those who are a little more daring think in terms of getting rich. But it doesn’t stop there, far from there. If you held the power of narratives, you wouldn’t need money ever again in your life: you could be a god. You could quite literally be seen as a walking deity on the planet.

The ability to interpret reality and tell other people what is true and what is false is the greatest power that humans have ever held. The power of narratives.

In the Middle Ages, this power was held by the Catholic Church who interpreted the Bible in sermons all over Europe. The Bible was written in Latin, and you could even be sent into exile for unauthorized reading of that Bible in Latin.

The Church had no reason to fear any laws being made against their interest, for they controlled the entire worldview of the legislators. They defined the problems and they defined the applicable solutions.

In this day and age, some crazy guy named Gutenberg made it possible to bring Bibles by the cartload into the streets of Paris?. In French! Readable without interpretation! This tore down the church’s power of narrative like a house of cards under a steamroller.

In this, the Church saw themselves as the good guys and wanted to set the record straight, to prevent the spread of disinformation. They had learned that they were the carriers of truth and could not unlearn having this position. Thus, the penalties for using the printing press gradually increased all over Europe, until it hit the death penalty: France, January 13, 1535.

Yes, there has been a death penalty for unauthorized copying. Guess what? Even the death penalty didn’t work.

But as illustrated here, cracking down on the copying technology wasn’t really a matter of preventing copying. It was a matter of maintaining the power of narratives – the complete and total control over the world’s knowledge and culture.

Between the printing press and now, that power has been held by the operators of printing presses. They have observed, they have interpreted, they have retold the story of reality. Recently, the printing presses have received company from radio and TV broadcasts, but the model has remained the same: a small, small elite has determined what the world should know and how they should relate to the events going on.

The net changes everything.

All of a sudden, anybody can publish their ideas to the world in 10 minutes. And just like the Catholic Church, the previous powerholders of the narrative can’t deal with the situation this time around either, and see it as their job to restore order.

The gatekeepers of music – the record labels – are a very minor player in this game. It is much, much larger than that. The net redefines the entire previous classes of power. Those able to tell their story, rule. Those being arrogant enough to demand that people should just keep listening to them for no reason will lose their powers of influence.

Just like when the means of spreading ideas and information accurately, quickly and cheaply came along with the printing press in the mid-1450s, those who now hold the power of narrative are fighting the already-happened loss of their power of narrative with everything they have, and using any excuses they can think of. The actions are the same from every regime in the world – only the excuses differ.

In China, it is sometimes worded as “stability” or “morale of the nation”.

In some very religious Muslim countries, “sanctity of the Prophet” has been heard as motive.

In the West, it can be “terrorism”, “file sharing”, “organized crime”, and “pedophilia”.

Everywhere on the planet, the current regime – not necessarily meaning elected political leaders – choose locally acceptable excuses to crack down on the net. But the actions remain the same, and are aimed at preventing something much more fundamental.

The power for every person on the planet to observe, interpret, and tell their story is breaking the power of money. A fat bank account can no longer buy belief in a story. This equalization of humankind is something tremendously beneficial for about 99.99% of humanity – for the ones trying to destroy the net with every trick in the book are the very few that are being equalized downwards.

Just like in the 1450s. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

About The Author

Rick Falkvinge is a regular columnist on TorrentFreak, sharing his thoughts every other week. He is the founder of the Swedish and first Pirate Party, a whisky aficionado, and a low-altitude motorcycle pilot. His blog at falkvinge.net focuses on information policy.

Book Falkvinge as speaker?

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Adam

    Great article

    • Anonymous

      just as Shirley implied I am impressed that any one able to profit $9830 in one month on the computer. did you look at this web link==>> http://earn2usd.blogspot.com 

    • Lord of the Files

      Agreed!  I absolutely loved this article. It’s exactly what I’ve been thinking about for a while now and it’s great to see it finally put to words. I hope everyone reads it. Great job, Rick!

      • Anonymous

        just as Sharon explained I’m taken by surprise that anyone can earn $5949 in 1 month on the computer. have you seen this site ==>> http://earn2usd.blogspot.com 

      • Anonymous

        just as Elizabeth explained I didn’t even know that someone able to get paid $7147 in 4 weeks on the internet. did you read this website ==>> http://sure2go.blogspot.com/ 

    • Jenifer

      just as Sharon explained I’m taken by surprise that anyone can earn $5949 in 1 month on the computer. have you seen this site ==>> http://earn2usd.blogspot.com 

      • for reals

         SCAM!!!!!!! WHEN YOU HAVE TO PAY A COMPANY TO WORK EVER, IT’S A SCAM NO DOUBT

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/ZH3IFCBTGRQYNVBM62NIW3PWAM Kristin

      like Eleanor answered I’m impressed that a person able to earn $4681 in 1 month on the internet. did you see this web site (Click on menu Home more information)   http://goo.gl/aZlZj   

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/ZH3IFCBTGRQYNVBM62NIW3PWAM Kristin

      as Phyllis implied I didnt know that a stay at home mom can profit $9427 in 4 weeks on the internet. have you read this site  (Click on menu Home more information)   http://goo.gl/xRoVr 

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    I liked your articles. You write in interesting way. Thanks for great read.

    • Mwhahaha

      By interesting you mean polemic?

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PUVBRIS36F5QAWZN4X5MTMNIOU Fukk You

        Hey retard, whats up ?

        • Hyperion6

          Fuck you

      • Techanon

        Do you have a grudge against polemic writing?

        • No1_2_u

          No, he’s just another Troll who keeps posting nonsense day after day; he’s a small mind using big words.

      • Anonymous

        A well reasoned position is well reasoned precisely to the extent that it is NOT
        polemic.  It explains; rather than ignore, inconvenient facts.  It enjoys an almost unseemly luxury of ease and patience with which to hear and understand and respect and address opposing points of view.  It expects only to be treated fairly in return. 

        Does it suffice to say that a polemic argument assumes the opposite? 

      • Bruno

        Been reading Mwhahaha’s comments for quite sometime now. It’s like one moment he stood among us and the next his polar reversed in troll mode. Wonder if he’s having some split personality disorder. You notice too? Are you alright Mwhahaha?

  • politux

    Once again you’ve made me consider the issue in a new and thought provoking manner.  Thanks for the article, very nice.

  • http://www.cheapassfiction.com/ Aelius Blythe

    Very well put.  
    Of course, it’s this very fact–that anyone can contribute anything to the internet–which makes some people recoil.

    Not just the powerful, but the average person (read: voters) – Don’t many people complain about the crap that gets put online?  In the news or in the arts etc.  It seems to make people 1) hostile towards the internet, (“well, it’s all rumours and shit anyway!”) or 2) apathetic towards it and the efforts to control it  (“I guess someone has to do something…”).  

    But that’s what it means that everyone has a voice–that there will be crap and there will be gold, and nobody decides for us what we see and what we value.

    • asdf

      I just hope the average Joe comes to understand the power of having a voice. Oh wishful thinking, television my love, fill my empty head with your delicious nonsense.

    • Anonymous

      That, and everyone misses the fact that one person’s crap is someone else’s gold. And vice versa.

      (Quite literally: Trolls everywhere rejoice over both Tub Girl and Goatse man)

      On a less ironic note, what is of interest to one person is drab and useless to another. This is why pre-filtered content is and always will be an all-size-fits-none solution.

  • Anonymous

    This would be a great school report.

  • Mwhahaha

    I think what you say (at length) is true to a degree.

    However you miss one important feature of the argument and that is how people react and respond to powers.

    Take for example the news. Yes it is utterly fantastic that now anyone can make something ‘news’. But you know, I’m not going to spend 15 hours every day looking for a whole load of individuals take on what is happening. I have a life, I have stuff to do. As Eddie Izzard would say, I’m busy cooking eggs. 

    We like having someone inform us of what we should know and yes this leads to the people telling the stories having power which they often abuse. But the undeniable fact is that a huge percentage of people don’t want a truck load of strangers yelling at them. They want established producers of the medium filtering what is ‘best’. It’s just how people are.

    Also, when everybody can self publish it almost makes publishing anything meaningless.
    If I shout for someone’s attention they’ll hear me, when a billion other people are also shouting then they won’t have a chance of hearing me.

    Let’s take ebooks as an example. Now you can self publish via amazon for kindle.
    Yes some people will buy a book published this way, but the production process of publishing a book does enable it to be edited (or at least spell & grammar checked!). If you’ve ever looked at any story site online you’ll see that HUGE amounts of unreadable dross is submitted by people who assume anyone can write a 2 page story.

    I’m a person who likes the unusual things in terms of music and TV and film. I expect a certain quality. I disagree with most people who love the standard ‘big hits’ in music, tv or film. When we’re left in a position where *only* popularity matters we’ll lose a lot of interesting niche sectors of what media companies to bring us.

    Organisations which help improve and filter production of information and media are important in terms of quality as well as ensuring that the people who make this stuff are fairly paid for what they do. They have also historically published authors and musicians who weren’t immediately popular, giving them the time and space to emerge as artists.
    With no support network there and being forced to work as they create, how many will give up ahead of time?

    Currently the production houses of all ‘narrative’ have too much say and too much profit, but to go to the other extreme is asking for a total loss of quality in terms of leisure media and when it comes to information media you’re giving people the freedom to lie, cheat and manipulate unless you have regulation in the market place, which costs money.

    To wrest power away from these narrative holds you simply need governments willing to stand up to them. To put in place laws on profits and to police laws on monopolies.

    I really am starting to fear more and more that when it comes to creative industries the internet might not be the wonderful tool we first thought it might be and will instead become the Pandora’s Box which slowly kills our meaningful cultural output. 

    We’ll be left in a world of badly written ebooks, inaccurate & biased text books, wilfully incorrect news information, poorly executed films. TV shows won’t even exist in any recognisable format.

    To create and distribute on a long term basis you need to paid and as yet the internet hasn’t found a fair way of doing this. It needs to. We’re all being short sighted.

    • Anyone

      so do you walk blindly into any movie without informing yourself beforhand just because it is put out by a studio?

      and don’t pretend like right now everything the MAFIAA puts out is of superb quality, most is in fact shit. sure, it has higher “production value” than some guy on the internet could afford, but that doesn’t make the music or movies any better.

      and right now there are already lots of independent content producers on the internet that make great content (for example there are lots of great webcomics, or great short films), I’d say the internet increases our culture because the old gatekeepers and their agenda are not in control anymore.

      of course not everything everyone produces is great, or even good, or even decent, but that has been true before this revolution and will continue to be true.

    • http://www.cheapassfiction.com/ Aelius Blythe

      Why do you assume that there is no filter online?  It is a very common argument that because the current gatekeepers are losing their power, there is no filter whatsoever.  Not true.  

      e.g. You mention self-published Kindle books as an example of the crap that gets through.  And that’s true enough.  So what?  Most self published books sell only about 100 copies.  People don’t like them, in most cases people never even hear of them, and they die in oblivion.  Why?  They don’t make it through the filter.

      Sure, people don’t usually spend 15 hours a day wading through everything that’s ever produced online, but 1) some people really do, and 2) everyone’s got their niche interests to follow.  Consequently, the networks of people form a filter.  Yes, everything can be put online, but someone still decides if it is interesting, or true, or good.  Now that someone is us as a whole.

      Additionally, the rise in individuals producing content, does not in any way lessen the need for professional companies to help them do it.  It actually creates more of a need for quality production, marketing, design, editing, etc.  The roles of the producers may change, they are hardly going to vanish.

    • Noman

      TL;DR:

      1. People are sheep who want to be controlled by the media and told what to think.
      2. We simply need to wait for the government to come save us.
      3. Mwhahaha needs to up his dosage.

      • No1_2_u

        Amen!

    • Stick

      Take a look at a site like reddit. Millions shouting, but only a few are heard. The filter of “upvotes” and “downvotes”. It works well, the people are the filter, not others who presume to tell you what is best.

      Regarding the news. Again, using the internet, you decide what news is relevant. No, you don’t have to sort through a bunch of websites. Again, with reddit as my example. I decide, with others, what news is relevant.

      People think that it is a right of someone to be rewarded financially for creative creations. For their music or movies. But YouTube shows us that there is plenty of great music out there, absolutely free. I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect millions for your music anymore. Some of them make money via ad revenue, that’s a great method, not charging the viewer.

      My big point here, public voting systems, likes, upvotes, shares, favourites. These things sort the badly written ebooks from the masterpieces.

      “To create and distribute on a long term basis you need to paid and as
      yet the internet hasn’t found a fair way of doing this.” I agree that long term, high production value projects are harder without financial backing. But I don’t think it’s reason enough for all the power that the entertainment industry gets.

      • Adam

        don’t forget about Kickstarter when it comes to 
        high production value projects

    • asdf

      I’d like to think that NOT having quality filters would make people smarten up. Oh, what am I saying? Television my love, come back here…

    • Poop

      You sound like you work for the MPAA or RIAA or some opponent of free speech and the free flow of information.

      You also sound like you missed the point of the article, or you’re purposely ignoring it.  That main point of this article is the elite all around the world are attempting to subvert and throttle the internet, because it allows the “po’ schmoe” to the “average joe” free access to real, unfiltered information.

      So do us all a favor and stop trying to swing the focus of the actual topic to some insignificant distraction.  You’re making a poor argument in your attempt to scaremonger.  People ARE making money via the internet.  People ARE putting quality stuff out there.  As with anything in life,
      the bad will tag along with the good.  People can deal with it and choose for themselves without shepherding.

      The role the internet played in aiding the Middle East revolts scared the pantaloons off the elite.  That’s what got the ball rolling with the recent attempts at suppressing the internet.  That’s what this all boils down to in the end.

    • Chris

      “We like having someone inform us of what we should know”.

      Really? I don’t like the fact that 99% of the stories we hear on the news are spun out to make us think in a certain way. I’m bored of it, bored of it all.

    • Danny

       You read this blog site instead of the sun? Case and point my good man!

      You are not reading the bullshite murdoch is peddling and so are already in the group of people who don’t want to listen to the main media outlets.

  • http://twitter.com/svulliez Shawn Vulliez

    Great article, Rick. I’ve thought about expressing this same point.

  • Mwhahaha

    “The power for every person on the planet to observe, interpret, and tell their story is breaking the power of money”

    1 – Most people on the planet, like myself, aren’t overly interesting. (See All of Twitter)
    2 – They’ll stop doing it once they get kids.
    3 – Yay! No more money, now maybe I can go barter a witty anecdote about how my shit was a funny colour today, or something dull I thought of last night with the baker for a loaf of bread.

    Currently I’m seeing independent sites whose creators attempt to earn a living from (via direct sales and ads etc) slowly going to the wall due to the economy. What happens when they have to go get real jobs and can’t sit there all day thinking of neat stuff to put online?

    There has to be a balance.

    • Steve

      He who controlls the internet will control the future.  Should “we the people” control the web, or should the web be controlled by a handful of dickheads?

      Tough question.

      Mwhahaha calls for balance, and balance is important, but the overriding issue here is “freedom vs slavery.”

    • Camilo

      You are trolling, right?

      Because you’re posting utter nonsense comments all over here.

  • Pingback: The Net vs. The Power of Narratives | Best Seedbox

  • Anonymous

    This is such a crappy article; to write all this basically on an extremely simple and subconciously well known idea. i felt i was reading this out of a college text book; diluted, lame, extremely boring, piontless and a waste of time.

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

       lol ^
      As trolls go you’re either extremely brave to post such slanderous drivel against our illustrious guru, or you’re quite simply insane and wish to invite a torrent of abuse for openly attacking Rick F on blatantly groundless reasons which hold no reality whatsoever with the content of this BRILLIANT article.

      Rick has quite clearly, and yet again, written concisely and authoritatively on a specific angle relating to the history and development of human-made communications over an aeon.  And he’s done so on a level that we can all understand and follow with ease (that’s my way of saying thanks Rick).

      Clearly hosa doesn’t yet have internet access in his cave.  Give it time – the Truth will find you.

    • Retaliator

      If you want to dissent At least you have to make some sense. You are a poor corporate troll and you are no convincing anyone that you opinion is real. 

    • zork

      yeah i couldn’t really see the piont either

  • DutchGuest

    Once again you’ve written an excellent article Mr. Falkvinge, it’s a very apt observation of similarities between the copying then and now.
    Now all we need is some revolution, people !
    Get it going ! ;-D

  • Anonymous

    Now there is a dude with a plan, I like it.
    Dodging-CISPA.tk

  • Pingback: The Net vs. The Power of Narratives | We R Pirates

  • Rickytanver

    That was a good read. Nice job. Governments are obsolete :]

  • Anonymous

    Rick, this is your most important posting to date. 

    Why?  It compells desperately needed Perspective. 

    I was blessed with a mentor long ago who said, “The world is governed by Pedantic intelligence which argues an infinitely long line of facts in order to reach an insignificant conclusion.”   He added, “Inspired Imagination has the economy of the heavy hammer which, raised high, reaches its highest arc before landing hard on the fat thumb holding the piece of wood.  That hammer is only one relevant fact; but One that speaks conclusively of significance.” 

    The narrative that is most immediately being nullified in the heart and mind of Modern Man is all that defines that most treasured historical illusion of a Universal Free and Humane Civil life under a Democratic Rule of Law. 

    Average citizens see, all around them, what they think are the residual vestiges of failed historical Oligarchies.  They are individually horrified to see the outlines of what they are becoming:  People whose role in life is primarily to produce and consume; but, not necessarily create.  People, who are free to vote; but, whose vote counts more as catharsis than choice between contending poilicies.  People who enjoy Right of Privacy and freedom from Arbitrary Siezures; but, who each day update their count of warrantless intrusions into their Privacy and Property.  People who are said to have the Right of Free Speech; but, who know more clearly each day that such Speech is being Monitored and can and will be used against them.  People who know that the essence of Due Process Rights is their only Guarantee of Standing before the courts to plead Equity for injustices and Abuses inflicted on them extra-judicially; but, who awaken each day to yet new legislative grants of Immunity from Liability which will make mute their Legal Standing and abort at conception their claims for Equity from entities powerful enough to be protected. 

    Taken together, this is an ugly picture:  But, this is NOT the people we will become in five years or in ten years.  This is who we are Today! 

    We see what’s looming just over our shoulders:  We’re young enough perhaps to have been told by nostalgic grandparents about the American Plantation System where Black People were slaves.  Perhaps we’ve had the opportunity to hear an aunt or uncle express his shock to have seen Weimar Germany in 1938 turn into the Third Reich, “Before my eyes!”   The Berlin Wall or the STASI cannot yet be described to us as mythology. 

    Authoritative voices, from Government, Business, The Press, Academia, reassure us that the an infinite line of enumerated “Facts” prove that we have nothing to fear.    

    Kudos to Rick for very necessary “hammer on thumb” insight on where our collective train is REALLY headed.   

    Yet, that’s an awfully HUGE train; moving very fast in the wrong direction. 

    Im not sure that even the combined voices of Six Billion passengers could be loud enough to wake the Conductors up.

  • Akai Hen

    I love the text but i really didn’t get the connection between pedophilia and file sharing as a West media flag to fight against it…. as much as i agree with the comparison with the Catholic church and the media control and the bible…. as protestant as i am. I would say the power it seems to have becoming descentralized but it’s just been used by others that so far we can not see… by the supposly freedom of net, other powers are taking place… in spite of it, big money still buy stories, better now with internet….. troll culture is there too…. you mention like Africa doenst exist or poorest countries in the world, u talk about a revolution that it just need to shutdown the power to stop…. as long the power of narratives dont become power of wisdom into practice…. the majority of the world are going to perish in misery…. it’s about human nature to not want to be free… they want easy things that make them dont get in trouble or to give them moral responsability

    • Anyone

      pedophilia is often being used as an excuse to censor the web
      and once that censorship is in place it will be used for all sort of things.

    • Anonymous


      but i really didn’t get the connection between pedophilia and file sharing as a West media flag to fight against it”

      Both in the US and the EU one of the most common “banners” under which pro-censorship internet laws are carried out is “child pornography”. The other main one being “Terrorism”.

      Or as the head of the danish Ifpi put it in 2007 at a conference for copyright dogmatists: “Child pornography is great! It’s great because governments understand child pornography. And if we can get them to accept censorship where child pornography is concerned, we can place our own issues on the same table…”.

      Whenever you raise the issue of “free communication” and “free speech” in the west it won’t take long for someone to raise either terrorism or child pornography as an argument as to why government censorship and surveillance of communication should be allowed and encouraged…

  • iReader

    I love TorrentFreak news… something you don’t read on newspapers tv etc

  • Shita-Tapeworm

    NETZ: All your base are belong to us…FUCKERZ

  • http://twitter.com/mangamaster99 Omar Ibrahim

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdILmgJGuvw

    • Kbk

      Skip to 3:02 very interesting
      liked this celeb physisist much… his very articulate!

  • Pingback: The Net vs. The Power of Narratives « Cyber IT Solutions

  • https://thepiratebay.org/user/manOtor/ manOtor

    Thanks for another great article, Mr. Falkvinge.

    @1a2d411eb5ed6109b2fc111f58871c5b:disqus
    To wrest power away from these narrative holds you simply need
    governments willing to stand up to them. To put in place laws on profits
    and to police laws on monopolies.

    Wise words, and looking at the constantly changing political landscape in Europe for instance, the parties involved are doing the best they can. If it’ll be enough, is a question for another day, though.

    I really am starting to fear more and more that when it comes to
    creative industries the internet might not be the wonderful tool we
    first thought it might be and will instead become the Pandora’s Box
    which slowly kills our meaningful cultural output. 

    We’ll be left in a world of badly written ebooks, inaccurate &
    biased text books, wilfully incorrect news information, poorly executed
    films. TV shows won’t even exist in any recognisable format.

    I think you can’t be more wrong.

    Like Aelius Blythe I believe in the masses as a filter.
    The truly good stuff will make it to the top, crap will still exists and occasionally be washed up to the surface, but sorted out eventually.

    Why would you think quality will suddenly cease to exist?
    The Internet is not the final entity to decide over the worlds “meaningful cultural output”. It is merely a way for culture to spread over the world without the distributors of an old system to keep there hands on it for profit.

    The described shift of power of narratives simply forces the established distributors of news, books and media to become less biased and more on the level or die within the process.
    Regarding news big media moguls don’t have the power anymore to determine what everyone should know or not.
    Regarding music, movies or TV shows they simply lost the ability to raise profits through different distribution windows.
    Whether this is good or not for any economy, it’s a change like from low tide to high tide that can’t be controlled or stopped.
    The only thing left to do is to embrace it and step up to the challenge, by developing new business models. And they’ll might actually find out that this could be a good thing profit wise…

    • Esn

       ”I believe in the masses as a filter”
      Well, that’s one way… but a more sophisticated filter would be something that allows me to see what people who liked the things that I like like.  And in fact, many websites do have exactly such a filter and recommend things that you might like based on what you’ve just viewed (Youtube, Goodreads, Amazon are some examples).
      Although perhaps you might say that in these cases, the ultimate power rests with the person who wrote that algorithm. Still, it’s not too bad so far.

      • Anyone

        the algorithm is based on other people
        it looks what other people that the algorithm deemed similar to you viewed and bases recommandations on that.

        so again, it is the filter of the masses, just not so obvious like on reddit et al.

  • No One

    Your argument is too simple.  While partly true, mostly it is because the users of the Internet are not using it responsibly. 

    Bullying on the internet leading to kids killing themselves is an example.  It can’t be stopped either.  The social media networks are designed to bury unpopular content and push people to read more popular content.  You see your kid being bullied on Facebook?  You can post for people to stop, and they report/downvote you.  Your voice is squelched.  Report it to Facebook?  Yeah, doesn’t work because there aren’t enough people agreeing with you and clicking that report button enough to trigger a human to respond.  It all works great when you are telling everyone about your favorite restaurant, but things like messing with kids not only is not free speech but it also should not be treated as something that is tolerated as long as a lot of people like to do it.

    So what is the response?  Gov’t people need to screw it up for everyone because there are too many people not using it responsibly.  Sure, some of it is to squelch free speech that should be heard, but think about how helpless you would feel when you’re watching a relative getting bombarded with crap from a bunch of people online and you can’t do anything about it.

    • Patrick

      How much do you guys make over at the MPAA now a days? I see everyone is stuck on bullying too, since it is so new and all. in the 80′s, kids never had to deal with them. I had my fair share too until my father taught me how to punch someone square in their nose. Surprisingly, was not bothered by anyone after that.

      If someone wants to be a racist, that is their human right.
      If someone wants to be gay, that is their human right.
      If someone wants to stand up for themselves, that is a human right.

      Let’s say you are a kid that is bullied and you stand up for yourself and punch the guy in the face. In this society, you are just as guilty and suffer strict zero tolerance policies. Walk away, tell a teacher… what a joke. Now we have nut jobs, like yourself, who think we need legislation to control every aspect of our behavior. Part of life and being a grown up is learning how to deal with things. Your mentality is screwing this world up.

      Who is to blam when a kid kills themselves? Is it the fault of the bully? I don’t think so! if the parents want to raise their children by allowing them to watch Disney 16 hours a day, they are the ones to blame. How often is a kid raised by the parent anymore. Not very often! They are instatutionalized very young with that clone mentality. Not too many free thinkers anymore and when someone writes an article showing how history repeats, you try to justify it. Shame on you! BTW, I wrote this on an iPhone so I don’t want to hear any crap about a couple misspellings.

    • Andrew Lee

      lol What? I dealt with bullies when I was in school much worse then some
      retard on the internet talking shit. I realize kids have gone so soft
      these days you can pretty much make them commit suicide for looking at
      them wrong. When I was in school the bully examples was not like the one
      of that kid just tapping the big guy that end up fucking him up. I’m
      talking about three or four people seriously beating the shit out of you
      after school. Well at least till you decide to stand up and catch them
      one by one busting their heads in.

      Violence is the answer in some cases I wish it was not but it is. Anyone
      can say blah blah fighting is never the answer but back them into a
      corner so far they have no other option and see what happens. Their
      opinion will change very quick..

      The truth is there will always be assholes out there with a chip on
      their shoulder. Bad home life with a drunk dad beating them or whatever.

      If I ever have kids they will be raised to stand up for themselves. If it means getting suspended from school for slapping some asshole upside the head for being a dick so be it. I’ll even tell the school to go fuck themselves no questions asked and buy my kid something for doing the right thing.

      Fucked up? Hell no! Standing around letting some kid push you around week after week with teachers just saying stop if they catch it is fucked up. My favorite line of the teacher is “Cut it out you two” Like the kid getting bullied is enjoying it.

      Thankfully for me I wrap it up. I’m honestly scared as hell to bring a kid into this fucked up world. Where are first applications of powerful technology such as nuclear is to make a bomb.

      Einstein – OMG I GET IT! E=MC²!
      Government – Will it go boom?Einstein – Are you fucking kidding me? “Should have kept my mouth shut”
      Government – This is gonna be so fucking pro!WTFBOOOOOOOOOOOOM’You know when you make one of the greatest minds in history regret coming up with the single most important equation in the history of physics you’ve fucked up.Also if you don’t like Facebook DON’T GIVE YOUR KID AN ACCOUNT! If Facebook is messing a kid up that bad they’re showing that they are too immature to be using it still. Shit talk will never end and if a kid cannot take it on the internet DON’T LET THEM USE IT. If they kill themselves over it who’s fault is it? THE PARENTS FOR DOING A SHIT POOR JOB OF WATCHING THEIR KIDS. It’s their job all the way up till their kids are 18. If they can’t handle the job they should have thought about that before they decided to practice unsafe sex. Not after they bring another person in the world. I have zero respect for a parent that does not do their job of protecting and raising their kid. Even if it means they have to make decisions the kid will think is “UNFAIR” but it’s in their best interest.You catch them doing something wrong well spank their ass and ground them. I assure you it won’t kill them. It might teach them to have some goddamn respect.. You never heard about kids shooting schools up years ago because there was this thing called busting your kids ass when they got out of line. The whole you’re grounded with no other form of punishment is laughable. The same as “TIME OUT” rofl. If I never got my ass busted when I was a kid the whole line of you’re grounded go to your room would have ended in failure fast.You’re grounded! “LOL I’m leaving I’ll be back later!”No your not! “What are you going to do? Ground me some more? ROFL”A kid getting their ass busted DOES NOT MEAN BEAT THEM WITHIN A INCH OF THEIR LIFE.  Thinking back every time I got a spanking it hurt far worse emotionally. I also remember don’t do that again and I wont get in trouble!Man the people like you piss me off so much. Well not really it just gives me a reason to bitch. If you morons would stop trying to fix everything by taking away freedoms this world might have a chance of surviving the next 100 years. I’m sure you’re one of the WILL IT GO BOOM PEOPLE
      Saying that I leave you with these parting words.Sir you can go kindly fuck yourself in the mouth with a chainsaw. Please put yourself out of our misery.After all  this rage I think I will be calm for weeks rofl!
      “No clue why it globs into one line after the max tried to fix it sry :(“

    • Anonymous

      Excuse me?

      Yes, bullying is bad, but consider this – we have the exact same problem in real life. And the answer, like it or not, was NEVER to introduce a mandatory watch of every social gathering in school or on the schoolyard.

      If you need bullying adressed then both on facebook and any other social circle this is what you do – you introduce your child to a gathering or group where such bullying does not take place. It’s that simple.

      As adults we have usually learned since long ago that wherever you go in life you will find Sterling Asshats who aren’t content unless they can make a victim of someone else. We know how to deal with it because we learned this as children. By moving to another circle and by gaining the support of friends.

      Because you refuse to realize that freedom of speech in itself unavoidably means that you need to take personal responsibility for which social circles you hang in, you feel the need to let someone else make those decisions for you. And you don’t really give a toss that the straw you toss your child was the one supporting everyone for whom freedom of speech and communication is a matter of life, prosperity and/or death.

      I pity both you and your child for forgetting that giving up essential liberties in exchange for perceived safety will gain you neither but lose both.

    • Anon

      Bullying on the internet leading to kids killing themselves is an example.

      I think when you investigate the stories of internet bullying you’ll find that those that kill themselves are actually being bullied in school. There is a location in the mid west where several kids have committed suicide because they were bullied simply for being and in one case thought to be gay. Bullying on the internet is basically what is going on in the ‘schoolyard’ being taken online. If it isn’t happening in real life then by my definition it can’t be called bullying, someone has to be phsyically intimidated and/or hurt to be bullied and have no control over it. If you’re being bullied online surely you can just not vist the site where you’re being bullied.

      • Anon

         http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/04/teen-sues-over-facebook-bullying.ars?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+arstechnica/index+%28Ars+Technica+-+Featured+Content%29

      • Guest

         ”be phsyically intimidated and/or hurt to be bullied and have no control over it.”

        Your definition is false, and you are wrong. There is a phenomenon called “psychological bullying”, where bullying causes no physical harm, and involves no violence. It is just as psychologically damaging as physical bullying. If you don’t want to take my word on that, here’s a link to scientific evidence proving you wrong.

        http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070523103409.htm

        A quote from that article: “School bullying doesn’t have to leave physical bumps and bruises to
        contribute to a hostile and potentially dangerous school environment.
        Behavior that intentionally harms another individual, through the
        manipulation of social relationships (or ‘relational aggression’), is
        just as significant a concern for adolescent psychosocial development
        and mental health, according to Dr. Sara Goldstein from Montclair State
        University and her colleagues from the University of Michigan.”

        Now, knowing that, let me explain why internet bullying is a problem. Internet bullying attacks someone through manipulation of their social relations and denying them their routines. To explain, bullies can send messages through Facebook, twitter and other such services which make accusations or damaging comments about the victim, disrupting their relationships with the other people they know. In addition, rude, vulgar or violent messages can be sent to e-mail accounts and messaging services, making the victim feel threatened. The only way to “avoid” this, as you suggest, would be to cut off all public internet communication so they would be unable to see anything the bullies said. Common sense should tell you that this is not an option.

        Educate yourself about what bullying is, read the article I posted, and then you’ll understand why you were wrong.

        • Harryco

          What youre saying carries validity but youre missing the point: children still need to be taught to deal with such situations; else what would you be suggesting, limitations on our free speech and options for legal restitution?

        • Guest

           I didn’t suggest or endorse any solutions. I attacked the propositions underlying his beliefs.

          Think about it like this; he has beliefs about what should be done. However, his beliefs are based on false information. It’s like if I say; birds lay eggs, a platypus is a bird, therefore a platypus lays eggs. It’s irrational, and because he followed this illogical process, we can’t trust any conclusion he comes to.

          If you want to know what I think needs to be done, I’ll answer that I’m not sure. It’s easy to say “children need to be taught to deal with such situations”, but there is conflicted information about what constitutes dealing with the situation. Many people advocate violence on the part of the victim, but research does not show that this is actually an effective solution in many situations. Take most situations of psychological bullying, particularly most instances of female bullying. Physical violence is rarely used, and power is achieved by breaking down someone’s friendships and social relationships. If the victim was to initiate violence in this situation, their action would directly lead to giving the bully more power, by furthering the indirect goal of reducing the victim’s social standing. After all, most people don’t respond well to initiators of violence, even if the initiator could claim a reason.
          That’s even assuming that violence is a solution. In middle school, there was a bully who was about half a foot and fifty pounds bigger than everyone else in class except me. He also knew how to fight, because as a very physical bully, he had to fight often. There was one instance where one of the smaller kids he was bullying tried to fight back by hitting at his groin. The bully blocked his strike and began beating the crap out of the small kid. It wouldn’t matter how long that small kid trained. He was over 60 pounds and a foot down from this bully, not to mention that he had no real fighting experience (sparring and training are good, but there is a ton that they can not teach you).

          Another solution that was proposed earlier was to find a new group of friends (scary devil), but that makes the assumption that there is a diverse enough population in the area that finding a new friend group is possible. As a case example, there were 50 people in each grade of my middle school. There was no ability to change friend groups; the only way would have been for our parents to move so we could go to a different school.
          That’s also ignoring the fact that changing all of your friend groups is something children are already doing. That’s part of the psychological damage that we notice in bullied children; they have few friends and are taxed by the effort or prospect of finding more. It’s not a solution if it’s something that’s already being done, and isn’t helping much.

          If you want a solution, I’ll go with this; research shows that encouraging children to speak to adults who are capable of setting up mediation is one of the only solutions that works rather consistently. Mediated talks between bullies and victims can increase empathy and understanding on both sides, and can not only help the victim stop being bullied, but it can help correct the underlying problems that lead the bully to try to assert power over others. It’s important to remember here that punishment from the school, while maybe satisfying to hear about, does not have a good track record of changing behavior.

          So, no, I don’t think that free speech limitations are a good solution, but that doesn’t mean I accept any alternate solution that can be spat up.

          As a last point, I would like to address all the claims by everyone in this thread that “parents need to parent better”, particularly the idiot who thinks that bullying by peers can not cause suicides, and that any instances can just be blamed on parents. Read “The Nature Assumption” by Judy Rich Harris. It basically says that research shows that most behaviors that adolescents show is not due to their parents, but is instead due to their peer groups, and the main effect parents have on socialization is what peer groups the children are exposed to. Don’t assume that they are responsible for all or even much of the behavior of the bullies or the bullied.

        • Anonymous


          Another solution that was proposed earlier was to find a new group of friends (scary devil), but that makes the assumption that there is a diverse enough population in the area that finding a new friend group is possible. As a case example, there were 50 people in each grade of my middle school.”

          Being that this was regarding internet bullying the child in question has the very real ability to find an entirely new circle of friends literally anywhere in the world.

          This is what separates “cyber-bullying” from REAL bullying. You don’t like the people in the ring your in, peg your wigwam in another social circle. It’s that simple.

          This is where parental assistance comes in. If your child attends a part of an online community filled with trolls then suggest to him he leaves that part and starts anew somewhere else.

          In the real world bullying is a lot harder to mitigate this way since you can’t avoid the mob on the schoolyard. And this is where you need “moderator” i.e. adult supervision and intervention.

          Bullying online is done mainly by way of manipulation and rumor spreading. This is true. The solution to THAT, however, is simple. You start finding the other people bullied the same way and offer to start a “Full Disclosure”-circle. Whenever Bully A says anything about anyone in the circle, the person to hear it disseminates it to the circle – no matter what it is. This is how I and my friends dealt with the fact that there was one pathological liar around who tried “bonding” with person A by spreading rumors about what person B had said about person A…and vice versa.

          Not only did that work very effectively at defusing whatever the liar was saying, it ensured that in our circle, we became a lot closer.

          And if your child has no friends close enough in that part of the online community to work with such a solution, then honestly, he SHOULD leave it altogether.

          One thing is certain – the idea of online “monitoring” and “anti-bully legislation” will solve nothing. Indeed, rather than empowering the bullied party it disempowers everyone. And in the process, as “collateral” damage, in practice disembowels freedom of speech. Unless you want a paradigm where the people currently bullying other people instead do the same by way of trolling the legal system, I would advise other options.

    • Guest

      “Bullying on the internet leading to kids killing themselves is an example.  It can’t be stopped either. ”

      Actually it can be stopped. Kids kill themselves over internet bullying because they’ve been failed by everybody IRL. 

      Solution?

      Shitty parents and adults, stop failing your kids in real life. 

    • Common Man

      Don’t do Facebook.

      You can’t expect others to respect your privacy if you don’t respect it yourself.

  • asdf

    Enter Google! Your new Internet narrator. Enjoy.

  • Esn

    A fine essay, Mr. Falkvinge (I always enjoy reading your posts here), but I think the thesis might require a bit of fine-tuning.

    Even long ago, nobody had the power to entirely dictate the narrative of life. The transmission of information via word of mouth was enormously influential, and no leader had the ability to spy on every conversation. I think the main change that the internet has made is that this sort of node-to-node transmission of information (which has always existed) now has the potential to be lossless instead of lossy, and it is easier to track down the original source and judge its veracity for yourself, free of editing (even though word-of-mouth transmission could be much more accurate than we can imagine these days, because most of us have lost the ability).

  • Pingback: The Net vs. The Power of Narratives

  • tonyj

    Power of narrative is what changes people’s attitudes or affirms their prejudices.  Just look at those John Tanton’s racist anti-immigration network like NumbersUSA or FAIR.  Their talking points are consistently found all over the internet by people who know less about these social issues. BTW, John Tanton was the guy that was organizing social and political groups in the U.S. eject Jewish Americans and African Americans out of the U.S. through policy changes back in the 60s.

  • Jonas

    Surely you must know Rick, that in our age. Power is where we as a people perceive it to be.. The problem lies very much in our perception. And even more so in our excess. We are constantly entertained and woed, with our abundance of food, and our  overflow of mainstream entertainment, we are content with being bullied, because we’re too busy to mind all that. Busy paying off our abundance.

    Mvh. Jonas. Former Swedish Pirate party activist.

  • Anon

    Great article and it’s what I’ve been saying alll along. The only thing that has pushed their agenda to a faster pace was last years ‘Arab Spring’.

  • Internet

    This is a really good article.

  • Free Internet

    The best thing you can give a child is your time and the best thing you can teach them is free thought.

  • Anonymous

    enjoyed the article, Rik. i guess what it shows more than anything is that those who are used to having control are not going to relinquish it without a hell of a fight! that’s where people like yourself and Christian come in. you have a real uphill task to convince the EU that their copyright attitude is wrong and needs drastic change. however, change it must have and i for one hope you are able to continue the struggle through to fruition!

  • Pingback: Quote of the Day: Death Penalty for unauthorized copying | A Division by Zer0

  • Mett

    Ev0lut1on pattern 1n da p0pul4t1on of the 4th planet

  • Pingback: Why Governments Are At War With The Internet | Business Pundit

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000155602336 Crag O’Scolaidhe

    f**k CISPA & all who support it.. support #anonymous!

  • Don

    THIS. This is the crux of the matter. I’m watching citizens fight wave after wave of badly written legislation (and by badly I mean, legislation that tries to take their power away again) without realization the size and significance of the battle is much larger than one piece of legislation – it’s poor vs rich, it’s David vs Goliath, it’s the 99% vs. the 1%.

    The revolution has begun.

  • http://web.ncf.ca/shawnhcorey/ Shawn H Corey

    “The net is the second greatest equalizer that humankind has ever invented.”

    Fixed that for you. The gun is still the greatest equalizer: peasants didn’t have Rights before it was invented.

    • Anonymous

      “Democracy springs from four boxes – soap, ballot, jury and cartridge. Use in that order.”

      Falkvinge refers to the internet as making box number one a reality for everyone. Which it has traditionally not been. The peasant you refer to could in the past state his case only locally. Today he can tell the world about it without cost.His gun was of limited use when confronted with the guns belonging to the militia of the local warlord or robber baron. Indeed, before you get a citizen’s revolt on your hand enough peasants have to die that the citizenry at large actually feels the impact. In any society where communication cannot travel freely the government can generally speaking kill or oppress as many peasants as it likes.

      You may have your gun today, but without communication you are all alone in holding it and isolated from everyone else who does the same.

      So yes, the internet is actually the great equalizer. The gun is meant to come into the equation quite a bit further down the road. At which point in time it’s completely useless if everyone else holding guns only has the “official” view as to why you are prepared to fire YOURS in anger.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=561065992 Andre Watson

    This is some awesome writing.

    Shared.

  • E. A. Blair

    > it would be accepted as unconditional truth. What would you write?
    Nothing. Nothing at all.

  • Pingback: The Net vs. The Power of Narratives (by Falkvinge) | Tech, Policy & Society

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/3ABHMZQH6B77U2IPQGOGMDDJDE Joshua

    just as Ricky explained I didn’t even know that anybody able to earn $6026 in one month on the computer. did you see this web page  (Click on menu Home more information)  http://goo.gl/bvqXT  

  • Pingback: The Net vs. The Power of Narratives | Unfilter Headlines

  • U.S. Dissident

    Here is an article that seems to correlate with some of the info in this TF article: http://thedailybell.com/956/Anglo-American-Axis Very great article, thanks Rick Falkvinge! 

  • http://twitter.com/AveryShirley1 AveryShirley

    as Sheila said I am stunned that anyone able to make $7442 in four weeks on the computer. did you see this site link  (Click on menu Home more information)   http://goo.gl/F3e9E   

  • Pingback: El poder de unos pocos | Geekotic

  • Pingback: Social Blend » Blog Archive » Social Blend 199 will Rustle Your Jimmies

  • Blahblahblah

    civil liberties are flying out the door every day & we just sit back & laugh that it wasn’t us…
    corporations hire & fire in “right to work states” making employees sign contracts to turn over facebook accounts, take unconstitutional drug tests, not filling positions because you are not employed at present.
    governments with illegal search & seizures, hidden agendas stapled to the backs of innocuous bills about school lunches, a new NSA data center to spy on every piece of data in the world, TSA agents strip searching you…

    and you all lay down for all of it…. you all talk a lot of shit, but when it comes down to it… it’s all talk & they win again… because we are the evil pedophile pirate hackers & they are looking out for out liberties & freedom!

    just sayin…

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archive » The Net vs. The Power of Narratives

  • Pingback: On a second half of a course in Gothenburg « judamasmas' Weblog

  • Pingback: Sobre la segunda mitad de un curso en Gotemburgo « Weblog de judamasmas

  • Pingback: [Un cacho de catarsis] Que bueno que puse un blog. | Maldito Nerd

  • http://allstateagencies.com/88220 Lana Hackett

    the penalties for using the printing press gradually increased all over
    Europe, until it hit the death penalty: France, January 13, 1535.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.