TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Belarus Bans Browsing of All Foreign Websites

As citizens of the United States worry over the implications of the pending SOPA legislation, a small land-locked country on the fringes of Europe is showing how bad things can really get. Labeled by the United States as an “outpost of tyranny”, Belarus is certainly living up to its reputation. This Friday, browsing foreign websites will become an offense punishable by fines, with service providers taking responsibility for the actions of their users.

belarusWhile there are many reasons why people oppose the implementation of SOPA, a common thread is that any level of censorship will simply encourage yet more. The fear is that an inch will become a mile, and before long the Internet will be a place of restrictions where innovation is stifled.

Those pointing to China as an example of how bad things can get should now focus a little closer to the west, on the outskirts of Europe to be precise.

From January 6th, Belarus, which became independent in 1991 following the collapse of the Soviet Union, will begin severely restricting what its citizens can do on the Internet. New legislation requires that anyone doing business in the country may only utilize fully local Internet domains when carrying out their activities online.

As highlighted by the Law Library of Congress, this means that it will become illegal for locals to use a site such as Amazon.com, which has no official Belarusian presence. Indeed, browsing any website outside the country will be punishable with fines of up to $125.

The initial decree, issued in February 2010 by President Alyaksandr Lukashenka, requires the compulsory registration of all web sites which must then be hosted in the country.

The potential damage to the Belarus economy and their growth from online trade will be significant. According to Alexa, some of the world’s biggest sites are listed in the country’s Top 20 most-visited list including Google, YouTube, Twitter and Wikipedia, all of which have .com domains and US hosting. Indeed, only two sites in the Belarusian Top 10 currently appear to be ‘legal’ for local access.

Additionally, the legislation will also hold Internet providers, such as cafés providing wifi, responsible for the actions of their customers if they are found to be using foreign sites. The same responsibilities lie with home Internet subscribers who share their connections with others.

The suggestion is that such providers, commercial or domestic, will have to monitor for foreign website use and report the findings to authorities. The legislation also ensures there is plenty of data to hand over. As a minimum, ISPs and webhosts will be required to record the names and passport details of customers, along with their domain names, a description of their site’s activities and IP addresses allocated.

So for now, even Google’s Belarusian variant Google.by seems to fall outside the legal reach of citizens of Belarus, hosted as it is in the United States. Twitter, Facebook and Wikipedia have further problems, since the .BY variants of their domains have been registered by other entities.

Interestingly, while Belarus National State Television has previously aired pirated movies such as The Hurt Locker, they won’t now be able to grab them from foreign torrent sites as they did in the past. RUTracker, one of Russia’s largest torrent sites, is Belarus’ 20th most-popular site. However, it too has a non .BY domain and is hosted abroad, rendering it off limits to locals.

Torrents.by will be doing lots of business soon though – hosted and registered in Belarus.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    Methinks the Belarus government got hints from the MAFIAA and their US Office of the Trade Representative on how to draft laws that close down a Country and isolate it from the www (ie the World Wide Web).

    I wonder how much Belarus paid for such advice?

    • Anonymous

      however much they paid, it wont be a patch on how much their economy will suffer. this sort of censorship is coming to the whole world and basically, it is due to other governments cow-towing to the US entertainment industries and the US government in general.

      • Doug

        not quite sure this is right.
        It’s more like the Belarus gov is penalising businesses and individuals engaged in the sale of goods, works and services IN Belarus from servers outside her borders.
        It also mentions restricting access “in accordance with existing laws” to “extremist activities” and pornography. (see justification)

        In truth, we all know its about control of information – social media was a great tool for the arab spring So worried (the law was first drafted in Feb 2011), the gov introduces restrictions on what is viewed, and can also gain revenue through fines. Henceforth, anyone who wants to do business in Belarus will have to register there and pay the gov there.

        1 – Create justification
        2 – Censor the internet
        3 – Fine breaches of censorship (get money from fines and hopefully..)
        4 – get offshore business to register for tax
        5 – gain revenue from business taxes
        6 – allow corrupt politicians to line their own pockets and consolidate their power by oppressing opposition with their cool new toy.

        Censorship is for the greater good of everyone

        • Anonymous

          I’m thinking this as well. The law in itself is completely unenforceable. But it does provide a valid excuse to haul just about any ISP in front of a judge and have them shut down in a hurry.

      • Haha

        and the funny part is , it wont give anyone any extra money in the entertainment industry…quite the opposite….and hte fewer on the net = more cost cable and others have to charge as they are all like bundlers, which then makes a few more leave and the cost goes up up up and away…..

  • Anonymous

    Finally someone has made facebook illegal!

    • Glad

      If only.
      The article is mostly false.
      Yes, they restricted e-commerce to .by domains and Belarus data-centers.
      And yes they kind of made life harder for internet cafes and public Wi-Fi. Now they are required to identify client devices and store logs if I understood the law correctly.
      No, users are not restricted to .by segment of the internet.
      I read the actual law.

  • Anonymous

    this is more about stifling revolutions than it is about the MAFIAA
    the arab spring showed that dictators are not safe anymore so Lukashenko (the local “president”) just wants to stop the opposition organizing via twitter and facebook

    • Blackplan

      Agree. As much as I’m sure the TF comment regulars would like to attribute all censorship to record companies and their ilk, they aren’t *always* to blame.

      • Floppy Copy

        Wow. Just wow. It’s pretty obvious to me that this is a get rich quick scheme. If a foreign company wants to do any kind of online business and/or advertising in Belarus, they’ll have to set up their own server locally, register it, and pay a tax to the government for the privilege. Those in the country are still free to communicate with one another, so this law does nothing to stop “Arab Spring” type events from happening. Besides, who really cares about an insurrection when you, as part of the government, are now filthy stinking rich?

        The plebes I feel most sorry for are the gamers. Their options for online play are about to become super restricted. Only the really popular titles will have other local gamers to play against. The lobbies for everything else will be completely empty from this point onwards. The safe solution? Pick a new place to live, learn the language spoken there, and go. The other way is to rise up against you oppressors and set an strong example for future generations to follow.

    • Bob Genghis Khan

      Blackberry Messenger just killed that idea of control! Dictatorships – always two steps behind.

    • Anonymous

      Not exactly news. Berlusconi and Sarkoszy were both flirting with the idea of demanding licenses be issued for blogging. Understandable from any personal perspective as Sarkoszy is best described as a megalomaniacal pompous dwarf and Berlusconi is a dirty old lech with a sex addiction.

      Lukashenko may simply be treading the same warpath. I’m guessing old-style dictators are even less welcoming towards general blogosphere judgments than our leaders of the “free” west.

  • Pingback: Belarus Bans Browsing of All Foreign Websites | Droid Universe

  • Sandra de Palma

    I think the law is mis-interpreted by all the blogs and news sites that picked this story up. It says that as a business owner with a web site, your site has to be hosted in the country and that it has to have a .by domain name.

    Normal web site users can still access Google, Wikipedia and other web content which is not located in the country.

    • ndmushroom

      You make quite an interesting point. It’s no secret Belarus is not the dictionary definition of a democracy, but nor is it a secret that western interests in Belarus go well beyond “defending the democracy”, and therefore information on what happens there is sometimes made-up.
      http://law.by/main.aspx?guid=4251
      http://www.etalonline.by/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fDefault.aspx
      If anyone speaks russian and could clarify whether the law only refers to business owners or to regular users as well, it would be much appreciated.

    • http://TorrentFreak.com Enigmax (Andy)

      If there is some misinterpretation, the Library of Congress fell for it too…

      “The newly published Law imposes restrictions on visiting and/or using foreign websites by Belarusian citizens and residents. Under this new Law, the violation of these rules is recognized as a misdemeanor and is punished by fines of varied amounts, up to the equivalent of US$125.”

      http://www.loc.gov/lawweb/servlet/lloc_news?disp3_l205402929_text

    • Guest

      Are Google and Wikipedia not businesses that are not in Belarus and that don’t have a .by domain name? (I know Google HAS a .by, but they are still not located in Belarus).

      Or are you saying that it is now illegal for a business owner who is a citizen of Belarus to have a website hosted in another country without a .by domain?

      • Guest

        ???? ??????? clarified it, so n/m :)

    • Anonymous

      The problem is right here – “hosted in the country”.

      Meaning most online services would have to, at best, create a rather big exception to their ordinary models, generating quite a lot of extra costs and overhead.

      I.e. Amazon might in theory be able to set up an online presence in Belarus but if they did, even the internal purchases from their supply chain and international vendors would be considered in violation of this law, as it’s worded (both by the western translations and as defined by Belarus posters on this thread).

  • http://twitter.com/XxDuhastxX Paul Haas

    this is stupid

  • Esn

    This is probably largely about blocking access to LiveJournal. Too much free political talk happening over there. And the government decided to plan ahead and block everything instead of cutting off the heads of the beast as they pop up. Thing is, this will also prevent a great deal of professional collaboration between Belarusians and Russians. I follow some Belarusian people online, I wonder if they know about this…

  • Cabbage

    clever… cus they cant use a offshore VPN… so theyd have to use belarus VPN… but they’d still know your accessing USA sites w/ that belarus IP… hmmmm

  • Pingback: Nordkorea des Internets: Weißrussland bannt ausländische Websites | Basic Thinking

  • ???? ???????

    I am citizen of Belarus and I am familiar with our laws in the sphere of Internet regulation. What is written here is nonsense.
    In fact, the law is saying that the websites of Belarusian companies that are registered in Belarus and sell goods and provide services online, have to be hosted at hosting provider in Belarus. This doesn’t mean that the domain has to be in .by zone.
    And this also doesn’t mean that our citizens will be prohibited to browse foreign websites.
    Dear article authors, please study the situation carefully before sharing such incorrect information.

    • Harrison Weber

      Did you take a peak at the article by the US Library of Congress? http://www.loc.gov/lawweb/servlet/lloc_news?disp3_l205402929_text

      If what you’re saying is true, they screwed a lot up.

      • ???? ???????

        Yes, most facts are screwed up:

        “The newly published Law imposes restrictions on visiting and/or using foreign websites by Belarusian citizens and residents. Under this new Law, the violation of these rules is recognized as a misdemeanor and is punished by fines of varied amounts, up to the equivalent of US$125. (Id.)”

        In fact the law they quoted says:

        Residents of Belarus who sell goods or provide services of the territory of the Republic of Belarus using IT, and networks corrected to internet, these systems and resources need to be registered in the Republic of Belarus. Otherwise the fine is from $40-125.

        “The Law requires that all companies and individuals who are registered as entrepreneurs in Belarus use only domestic Internet domains for providing online services, conducting sales, or exchanging email messages. It appears that business requests from Belarus cannot be served over the Internet if the service provider is using online services located outside of the country. The tax authorities, together with the police and secret police, are authorized to initiate, investigate, and prosecute such violations. (Id.)”

        This is correct, businesses websites have to be hosted in Belarus (accordingly their emails will be running on Belorussian hosting). There is no obligation for all to register domains in .by zone though.

        “Additionally, the Law states that the owners and administrators of Internet cafés or other places that offer access to the Internet might be found guilty of violating this Law and fined and their businesses might be closed if users of Internet services provided by these places are found visiting websites located outside of Belarus and if such behavior of the clients was not properly identified, recorded, and reported to the authorities. The Law states that this provision may apply to private individuals if they allow other persons to use their home computers for browsing the Internet. (Id.)”

        Absurd. Internet cafes are obliged to ask for users ID’s (you cannot just browse internet anonymously in the cafe, you need to provide your passport :)). And for violation of this rules owners and admins of internet cafes will be punished. NOBODY PROHIBITS TO VISIT FOREIGN WEBSITES.

        There are actually some prohibited websites, such as pornographic, etc., some oppositional websites are in the list of prohibited too.

        In fact some interpret this law this way too, as Belarus citizens cannot use informational services outside of the country.

        This law is acting for about a year already, what they are saying now are just amendments, noone was fined yet for purchasing from ebay and amazon. These amendments are specifying the fines for law violation.

        • Anonymous

          “Residents of Belarus who sell goods or provide services of the territory of the Republic of Belarus using IT, and networks corrected to internet, these systems and resources need to be registered in the Republic of Belarus.”

          I find no way that an ISP would not be in flagrant violation of this law as you have worded it as soon as they allowed access to Amazon, an international backup hoster or a banking service.

          Unless there is a large slew of exceptions and amendments to this law which isn’t quoted in the article, every Belarus ISP is guilty of breaking it.

          Putting on my tinfoil hat I’d say it’s a very good excuse for the Belarus government to pull an Egypt/Iran solution to internet throttling in case of domestic disputes.

          “This is correct, businesses websites have to be hosted in Belarus (accordingly their emails will be running on Belorussian hosting).”

          No international company with an office in Belarus will be able to remain compliant with this law since almost every corporate intranet is run from a centralized location according to region.

      • ndmushroom

        Like I said before, western media have every interest in painting Belarus in the worse possible light (not that Belarus is a model democracy, mind you). I wouldn’t trust US information on issues related to russian allies any more than I’d trust George W Bush to inform me on the chemical inventory of Iraq (or the nuclear inventory of Iran for that matter). A pinch of salt? More like the entire Dead Sea from where I’m standing… :-)
        Anyway, techdirt clarifies certain things:
        http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120103/07193917260/no-belarus-is-not-cut-off-internet-new-restrictions-are-still-pretty-bad.shtml

    • Boo

      Belarus: Browsing Foreign Websites a Misdemeanor
      To link to this article, copy this persistent link:
      http://www.loc.gov/lawweb/servlet/lloc_news?disp3_l205402929_text
      (Dec. 30, 2011) On December 21, 2011, the governmental portal dedicated to official publication of laws and other legal acts issued in the Republic of Belarus published Law No. 317-3 of November 25, 2011, on Amendments to the Code of Administrative Violations and the Procedural Code of the Republic of Belarus. (National Law Internet Portal [in Russian] (last visited Dec. 27, 2011).)
      As stated in an explanatory note published together with the Law, this act was issued to implement the Decree of the Belarusian President of February 1, 2010, on Improvements to the Usage of the National Segment of the Internet. The newly published Law imposes restrictions on visiting and/or using foreign websites by Belarusian citizens and residents. Under this new Law, the violation of these rules is recognized as a misdemeanor and is punished by fines of varied amounts, up to the equivalent of US$125. (Id.)
      The Law requires that all companies and individuals who are registered as entrepreneurs in Belarus use only domestic Internet domains for providing online services, conducting sales, or exchanging email messages. It appears that business requests from Belarus cannot be served over the Internet if the service provider is using online services located outside of the country. The tax authorities, together with the police and secret police, are authorized to initiate, investigate, and prosecute such violations. (Id.)
      Additionally, the Law states that the owners and administrators of Internet cafés or other places that offer access to the Internet might be found guilty of violating this Law and fined and their businesses might be closed if users of Internet services provided by these places are found visiting websites located outside of Belarus and if such behavior of the clients was not properly identified, recorded, and reported to the authorities. The Law states that this provision may apply to private individuals if they allow other persons to use their home computers for browsing the Internet. (Id.)
      Also, the Law authorizes the government to establish and update the list of banned websites to which access should be blocked by Internet providers. The Law mentions pornographic websites and those that contain information of an extremist nature as examples of those to be blocked. The Law will enter into force on January 6, 2012. (Id.) Commentators believe that these measures will lead to outside websites blocking access from Belarus. For example, suppose someone in Belarus buys something from Amazon, which is not a Belarusian company and thus is not registered in Belarus. The transaction is illegal, and so the Belarusian Attorney General would send a note to Amazon informing it that it is violating national law and might be sued. Probably Amazon would close access to its website for visitors from Belarus, because such visitors comprise a minor share of the company’s customers but the resultant legal troubles caused by the Belarusian government might create a major problem. (Restrictions on BYnet: Amendments to Law Are Adopted, INTERFAX NEWS AGENCY (Nov. 8, 2011).)
      Author: Peter Roudik
      Topic: Communications and electronic information

      • ???? ???????

        Thank you for the quote, I can still see foreign websites ;)

        • Anonymous

          That’s as may be, but from a practical perspective, no international company will be able to station offices or branches in Belarus without for all intents and purposes cutting themselves off from the rest of the company unless they relocate the entire infrastructure supporting the intranet to Belarus.

          Browse all you like, but i’d use a very good adblocker as even viewing online advertising on a webpage can be construed as a violation of this law unless the ad server is located within Belarus. Or rather, your ISP could.

          That such a law is completely unenforceable in practice (and thus your ISP hasn’t shut down yet) does not make it any less moronic.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

    A point missed is that while the effect of the in theory is to cut belarus off from the internet and replacing it with a country wide intranet, they are still leaving the international gateways open, if heavily monitored.

    If their intention was to cut belarus citizens unfettered international access, they could easily have stipulated that the international gateways be on a separate network to public subscribers and be accessible only by licensed entities and sites for backend purposes.

    However Their real motives seem much darker as by leaving those gateways open to the public and by defining a chain of liability for infractions, they not only impose overwhelming fear and self censorship of the network within the country.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dtobias Daniel Tobias

    Wikipedia is actually in a .org domain, not .com.

  • Pingback: Belarus Bans Browsing of All Foreign Websites | We R Pirates

  • Never too soon.

    The Register has the correct story which isn’t this hysterical nonsense.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/01/03/belarus_internet_clamp_down/

    • Anonymous

      it says exactly the same thing

      • Doug

        no it doesn’t, read the last 7 paragraphs – it expands on the library of congress article

    • Anonymous

      The library of congress article says exactly the same thing. In practice the “hysterical nonsense” is actual fact. If Belarus entrepreneurs may not utilize companies registered outside of Belarus then for all intents and purposes some 95% of internet services are effectively gone as far as the average citizen is concerned.

      This is very serious. The way I look at it, very few international companies would be able to establish a presence in Belarus as most such companies use globalized resources in order to support their intranet and backup services.

  • Penisquente

    That’s the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.

    What about VPNs?

    • asdfjkasdf

      I think using VPNs may get a little difficult because the VPN user will probably need to connect to something from inside of Belarus and from there that server will connect to the outside world. However, the people running that server would then be liable to these fines.
      If it’s $150 for just an offence, it’ll rack up with a lot of customers. Way too risky.

      If, however, people can still connect to outside servers without being detected by ISPs then it may be possible but even then it’ll too much hassle for customers when the ISPs have to report a lot of people connecting to an IP address and a bunch of traffic coming to and from it.

      They’ll just look into who’s running that server, see it’s a VPN and all those people will get fucked.

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archive » Belarus Bans Browsing of All Foreign Websites

  • Pingback: Belarus Bans Browsing of All Foreign Websites | TorrentForce Blog

  • Saifon

    I’m no brain.. but wouldnt it then just be an easy task of hiding what country your from to access said restrictions.. such as VPN’s.. proxy servers and so on.. I mean.. theres a number of ways to mask IP’s and that.. so isn’t this whole idea have fundamental flaws?

  • Ale

    Please check the sources and amend the article accordingly.

    Something doesn’t add up here!

  • Guest

    Are you sure that this is correctly attributed to Belarus and is not the latest SOPA proposal for the USA?

  • Anonymous

    Dear TF,

    Please be more accurate with your articles. And edit when necessary.

    Sincerely,
    A reader.

  • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

    The local strongman in Belarus might have just sealed his fate by doing this. People do NOT like having their internet usage dictated to them, no matter what it is that is trying to be dictated to them.

  • Democracyisdead

    So it seem that Belarus has just lost internet.

    Great.

    We will find out how long it’s take for the people in Belarus to replace it and how they are going to do it.

    Meanwhile I tried to access the site Torrents.by and this is the message I got after few seconds:

    “This IP is not in any of lists at http://datacenter.by/ip/.
    Sorry, I can’t let you in because traffic outside Belarus cost $3 per GB. This is why this Tracker is only for Belarus.”

    No traffic in and no traffic out. This is an economic catastrophe for Belarus.

    This is the future of the US.

    (Note: Our experiments has shown that the FBI has infiltrated TorrentFreak or that torrentFreak is an FBI honey pot.)

    • IDIOCRACY

      Of coarse TF is infiltrated by FBI, and the dutch former prime minister Peter Jan Balkenende and the current one Rutte are the puppy dogs of Bush and Obama, that is why Fred Teeven (secret undercover ICE operative) wants to implement hard download laws (which failed only because the 2nd chamber of goverment was not paid enough by MAFIAA, hehe, I just made that up when I put my tin foil hat off, got a “brainwave”

    • heusio

      What are you talking about?

      What experiments?

      • Anonymous

        The flash of light you did not see did not erase your memories

  • Pingback: A Look Into The Future Of The Internet |

  • Anonman

    Sounds like a perfect way to ensure collapse, uprisings … you name it.

    Insane.

  • Anon

    Hahahhhana what a horrid country to live in their dictator wants to play nice though if he does not want a gadaffi…oh wait that is the plan because gadaffi got done online…yeah well won’t work…not like he can live forever see you in a couple decades Bealruis.

  • Ralph Brubaker

    Blames the US.

  • Anonymous

    You shouldn’t believe, my co-worker’s step-aunt makes $80/hr on the computer. She has been without work for 9 months but last month her income was USD9023 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this site… http://nxy.in/ncd9h

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FNRIJIQDLTHE5EVEICJBE5WDGQ Allen

    @amon ………my co-worker’s sister makes $70/hour on the internet. She has been out of work for 5 months but last month her pay was $7727 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this site http://nutshellurl.com/22i5

  • Rickards

    perhaps a commentary on WHY they are doing this.

  • Pingback: Remains of the Day: American Airlines Warns Customers of Phishing Attack [For What It's Worth]

  • Zuludroog

    Draconian, in the extreme. I wonder how the UN would regard this government since internet access is now regarded as a basic human right?

  • Anonymous

    Belarus wasn’t democratic anyway. I’m glad that they didn’t implement website blocking, just HADOPI like stuff but without the disconnection. Now let’s teach them to use TOR…

  • Aleksey Ponomarev

    The occurred confusion can be explained by the lack of objective and qualified information on Belarusian Internet regulation and the ambiguity of the provisions of the Edict on regulation of Internet.

    For correct understanding, please, consider the true-to-life (or at least the most objective) legal interpretation of the current Internet regulation in Belarus, available at my Blog dedicated to IT and Internet regulation in Belarus available at http://www.ITlaw.by

  • Anonymous

    Trying to explain things in short, basing on the comments of the regulator and opinion of Belarusian leading law firms, the common interpretation has been worked out: the hosting requirement is applicable only to Belarusian legal entities and entrepreneurs. Only Belarusian residents can be fined and (approx EUR 32 to EUR 96), but not to Internet users trying to access websites violating the Edict.

    There are no legal obstacles for any Belarusian resident to operate a website under international top-level domain names (.com, .net, etc.) or national domain names of other states (.ru, .ch, it. etc.).

    Neither visiting foreign websites is considered as a violation nor has any of foreign websites been blocked as both these measures are not prescribed by the Edict.

  • Pingback: Study shows Google updates succeeding in penalising low-quality websites |

  • Pingback: Pump Up The Presence Episode 10: This just in: Senate votes on SOPA January 24!: text

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Caterina-Abashina/100000073863005 Caterina Abashina

    This peace of news is a fun example of how a bad expert/translating can mislead the media. Here’s an article in English that explains what the amendments actually mean: http://belarusdigest.com/story/digital-iron-curtain-which-does-not-exist-7226

    P.S.: there are some comments explaining the meaning of the amendments, but still…

  • Pingback: Belarus bans surfing!-TorrentFreak « FACT – Freedom Against Censorship Thailand

  • Pingback: Belarus Bans Browsing of All Foreign Websites « Simni

  • Guest

    “Torrents.by will be doing lots of business soon though – hosted and registered in Belarus.”
    It’s unfortunate that will be limited to using programs from Belarus.

  • Pingback: USA, SOPA, PIPA, ACTA and how we're all f****** - Page 2 - PlanetCricket Forums

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.