TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

BitTorrent Freed Music, and Now It’s Yours

The Internet and file-sharing networks like BitTorrent have shifted music promotion from the labels to the people. Increasingly, record labels are losing control over what music the masses are listening to, and according to some musicians this is is actually a good thing.

chris zabriskieMeet Chris Zabriskie, a full-time musician whose career started roughly 8 years ago. Like many other artists, Chris has decided to give all of his music away for free. This isn’t down to Chris lacking a desire for money, but because he thinks that his music should be heard – and that it’s pretty much impossible to sell music nowadays without giving the public the option to “try before they buy.”

Zabriskie, himself an avid BitTorrent user, said he has leaked all of his albums on torrent sites ahead of their official release date. And he’s not the only one doing this. “I can tell you from numerous conversations and firsthand experience that there are few artists left, even in the big leagues, that do not. You wonder where the early leaks come from? Don’t be so surprised.” he writes.

People are not going to buy any albums before they’ve had a chance to listen to them, or before they’ve seen the artist perform live, Zabriskie reasons. Indeed, the top 1% of all artists might still be able to sell an album based on their previous performances, but the average artist has to be heard first. Much to the dislike of the RIAA, file-sharing networks are the preferred way for many people to sample music.

Zabriskie doesn’t see file-sharing networks as a threat to musicians though, quite the opposite in fact. “No one should ever be upset that people are downloading their record for free. They’re listening to it. And chances are they will buy it someday if they like it. Someone who doesn’t buy it still wouldn’t have bought it if they didn’t download it, so what’s the worry?”

In fact, much like radio, file-sharing networks are a great way to promote music. Zabriskie discovered this himself, as one of his tracks appeared on the famous Indie/Rock Playlist torrent in February 2008. Many artists have seen an increase in their fanbase after one of their tracks appeared in these playlists, since they were downloaded by tens of thousands of people.

“It’s really cool, just one person’s mixtape, but a great way for people all around the world to see what’s going on in music that month. So, very suddenly, tens of thousands of people from around Portland to Poland had that song on their computer. How did Criznittle find it? I don’t know, exactly. But he did, and he liked it, and he shared it, and I found a lot of fans because of it’,” Chris points out.

So what does this mean for the music industry, one might ask. It is hard to predict the future of course, but it’s clear that consumer to consumer promotion will be much more important than the marketing budgets of the major record labels. Music is being freed from the corporate stranglehold, and although it’s a challenge to find the right distribution method for the future, the artists and fans will come out as the winners.

Zabriskie’s final words sum it up nicely.

“Bottom line: if you like something you listen to, support the artist however you can. If that means buying something, great. If that means going to a live show, great. If that means sharing it with a friend, great. If that means blogging about it, great. If that means requesting it on your local college radio station, great. If that means just scrobbling it to Last.fm so people can see that you’re enjoying it, great.”

“That’s the future of music. It’s completely in your hands, not mine, not anyone else’s who makes music. Yours. Don’t let anyone judge you for how you choose to find and experience music. The soundtrack to your life is up to you. All music is free, everywhere. Don’t take that for granted. Share it, disappear into it. It’s yours.”

Amen.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • xSaimex

    Word!

  • Anonymous

    WOW…great going ———————-

  • J Dozer

    I couldn’t agree more with this article. I had bought tickets to a concert to see one of my favorite artists (who I discovered through BitTorrent), but had never heard of the band opening for them. I downloaded their CD to check it out, but was on the fence. I saw them live and was blown away by their performance! I bought their CD at the merch table, and am now a huge fan. I ~have~ to try before I buy. Buying a CD before listening to it is like buying a new outfit without trying it on to see if it fits – stupid.

  • accessko

    Good thing!

  • greenpete

    Heed tha man!

  • Mark

    Many artisis are finally waking up and realising RIAA are just greedy and want money. I descovered a LOT of songs from bittorrent and the ones I like the most I goto there concerts

  • Nokio

    very nice. if only more people saw it this way…

  • 4l13ndud3

    This is great to see more artists supporting file sharing! Kudos to you guys, without you, the RIAA would be in complete control of the music industry!

  • Free Torrents

    Awesome story. Bout time artists speak about stuff like this.
    http://torrentino.info

  • now if only…

    come on 2010!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Shaven Monkey Balls

    Organisations like RIAA are a cancer to music & should be chucked out on their arse, they’re shaping the course of music for the worse through greed by restricting the distribution of music, thereby giving (real) musicians less inspiration to draw from & create something new.

  • Baloo2

    “If nobody buys our records, there will be no real music in the future” they say, all those greedy suits, governed by their quarterly budgets and share holder’s demands.

    Well, guess what, they are right. At least the crap that they call “real music” will no longer be made. The computer generated crap marketed via music videos with half naked bimbos.

    I say: good riddance! Let’s get some REALLY real music. The kind of music made by people who primarily want their music to be heard, and only secondly tries to make money out of it. People with a true passion for music.

    Up yours, RIAA and IFPI and all your member companies! You’re history, only you don’t know it yet.

  • BT Fan

    @4. I agree with you. I did the same thing.

  • Memoran

    luckily his music is as good as his ideas. downloading more…

  • Anonymous

    no one can say he doesn’t practice what he preaches, you can download any on of his songs from last.fm

  • TheFuzzball

    I’d never heard of this guy before now, downloading…

  • Tiny

    The truth to me is most people who download music aren’t in fact ever going to buy the album. While it may provide a way for artists to expose themselves, I don’t think they can expect to ever make money off of the recording after the listener already has the files. I don’t like the “it creates sales” argument for file-sharing because of this. The real issue with file-sharing is whether digital data, which can be copied without limit, can have monetary value. Whether it is your right to copy information freely or not.

    I personally wouldn’t ever want a hard copy of my music library anyways so I won’t ever buy a physical album EVER unless it’s for extreme nostalgic effect.

    The route Radiohead took to distribute “In rainbows” is probably the route I would take if I were to sell music. With this distribution method people are paying not for the music but to allow the musician to continue to make music. It is a direct plea from the artist asking for donations.

    In the coming years I think there will be more of an emphasis on live shows since these are still physical experiences that can’t be copied.

  • Memoran

    he’s got both ambient instrumental albums and sort of folky acoustic albums it sounds like. really nice.

  • laty

    i star seeing Dune universe approaching us from these posts somehow …. is it just me?

  • Anonymous

    he recieves a big promotion by this article, great. ;-)

    well then let’s see what he has got… tomorrow.

  • Fin

    ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH

    Says it all realy.

    That said, I beleive the way forwards is in the past to be honest.
    Sell Vinyl, advertise via MP3.

  • NubCakes

    “At least the crap that they call “real music” will no longer be made. The computer generated crap marketed via music videos with half naked bimbos.”

    Gotta say though… I wouldn’t miss the music but the videos are another story. Always nice to have a few TVs running with no volume with half-naked 15 year olds strutting about at parties, it makes for a good atmosphere. :P

  • freetard

    so…an unknown artist with nothing to lose gives away his music (that nobody wants) for free?

    i smell revolution!

  • Hacker/pirates of the world UNITE

    open source Linux
    open source music

    now if you use it commercially in a commercial or advertisement for you company YOU PAY
    that’s the future
    and who shall sponsor it same as Linux

    THE PENGUIN IS COMING TO MUSIC

    /me has now made a penguin with gene simmons head on it as a OLD KISS MONSTER
    should send it to old geney boy.
    Prolly have a heart attack and die of retarded old age.

  • Kevin

    Quote: “Someone who doesn’t buy it still wouldn’t have bought it if they didn’t download it, so what’s the worry?”

    That’s where he gets it, and the Music industry doesn’t.

  • Brian P

    Intelligent man. I think the key here is that Zabriskie is doing what he loves to do by making music and only trying to make enough to support himself doing it, whereas somebody like Lars Ulrich of Metallica and his record label are fighting to keep making millions and millions off us in the monopolistic big record label game. That’s what the recording companies and big bands are trying to preserve with lawsuits and the RIAA, while guys like Zabriskie are realizing that with this new technology and new distribution methods, guys like him can reach a wider audience and make a living making music where they couldn’t before.

    20 years ago nobody would’ve heard of Zabriskie, and he’d probably have given up music entirely by now, unless he was lucky enough to catch on with a big promoter. In the future there’ll be more people making music and making a living off their music than ever before, and the recording companies will have to streamline and find ways to make it worthwhile for guys like Zabriskie to hire them to promote their music and work for them, or they’ll die. And that’s a good thing.

  • Am I the only one?

    This has never been a moral issue for me. I like stealing.

  • NubCakes

    “I think the key here is that Zabriskie is doing what he loves to do by making music… realizing that with this new technology and new distribution methods, guys like him can reach a wider audience and make a living making music where they couldn’t before….
    20 years ago nobody would’ve heard of Zabriskie, and he’d probably have given up music entirely by now”

    Oh right, whatever, thanks for your scintillating analysis that doesn’t make sense.

    If he loves music so much why would he give it up exactly?

    And for some reason you keep making some ridiculous mention of musicians being “pious” and “humble” and just wanting to “make enough to support themselves” when the article makes no mention whatsoever to this being possible as well as stating that “more people will make a living off it”

  • Blah

    Love it.

  • Usenet Own Torrents

    Usenet:

    -5,025,916 individual files including:
    298,501 TV episodes, DVD & packs; 298,990 XviD, x264 & DVD movies; 70,072 PC games; 82,236 console games; 2,795,270 music releases … etc.

    -Fanatical community request systems: if you request it and it’s out there, someone will post it for you.

    -Pre-times to equal the very best private BT sites.

    -Every single file full speed – always.

    -Every file available for 240 days, increasing to 400 days 1 day per 24 hours this year.

    -Completely safe and secure: **AA (or anyone else) cannot snoop on users downloading habits.

    After using Usenet every P2P method of obtaining files seems juvenile and half-assed. All files in one place, always full speed, WAY more content than any BT tracker (2.7 million music files – eat your heart out what.cd).

    Bottom line is: people that know what they’re doing and like content know that Usenet is the best way by way to get content online. Beating any private tracker experience and making BT look like a kiddy playground.

    Open up a world of content not seen anywhere else barring topsites – join the experts and join Usenet.

  • NubCakes

    LOL, couldn’t agree more, Usenet just sh*ts all over any form of p2p from any aspect you look at it.

    Once you’ve used Usenet there’s no going back… superior, totally.

  • Sanderman

    Someone, give him a medal.

  • NubCakes

    @22: “Says it all realy.

    That said, I beleive the way forwards is in the past to be honest.
    Sell Vinyl, advertise via MP3.”

    Agreed – for those that can experience vinyl properly (ie. listen to it on a reasonable quality amp + speakers) it offers a better experience that can’t be replicated via piracy… the sound is warmer and doesn’t have the kind of “hard edge” that digital samples impart to music.

    The cover art is better as well.

  • TheGman

    his the reason p2p will always be around :)

  • bout time

    Wow this article is great. Everyone should dl this guys music. Show the RIAA how many dl’s he can get in a week. Then everyone buy his cd next week. Create some statistics that will completely prove there theory of “Bittorrent hurts the artists” wrong. Simple excellente. Need more artist like this guy…AMEN AND GOD BLESS P2P/BitTorrent technology

  • Brilliant Death

    I’d say pretty much all of the CDs that I’ve brought in the last few years have been ‘illegally’ discovered first. Prior to that, when I had more money, I would often find myself buying an album on the back of a song, or even hype (for a stupid price, usually), only to find it sucked badly.

  • Jay
  • Pingback: popurls.com // popular today

  • John Davis

    As long as they keep it free, thats all that matters!

    TY
    http://www.privacy.at.tc

  • jeremy

    Simple summary:
    Obscurity is far more damaging to sales than piracy. “Pirating” my own movie worked for me:
    http://www.donetheimpossible.com

  • graphicartist2k5

    this is PRECISELY the reason why bittorrent is so awesome. the masses now have a way to listen to music by unknown artists BEFORE they go and chunk down money to see them in concert, so they know whether or not that artist sucks. too bad this didn’t happen before marilyn manson came out. otherwise, he wouldn’t have had NEAR the amount of “fans” at his concerts. for those who can’t read between the lines of what i just said: marilyn manson SUCKS! if you’re an emo kid reading this, and you like marilyn manson, get a clue. he’s not all that and a bag of chips.

    when are people gonna get it in their thick ass skulls that just because music is downloaded off the internet that it’s “stealing”? if anything, this article proves just the opposite. downloading music is really a form of research, so that we the people are more educated as to who sucks and who doesn’t suck, and based on our individual musical tastes, we are able to find out what new artists we like and do not like.

  • john

    Don’t forget that it takes thousands of dollars to record an entire album. To have you music given away for free after spending your life savings on an album carries a huge trust issue.
    I am all for file sharing but it carries a cost as well. Not all musicians have $$$ to just give away their music. Remember musicians are mostly starving artists, so make sure you support them anyway you can if you like their material.

  • Drew

    Agreed – this website mybandstock.com is an amazing way to get people involved with music. Its a new start up in the US that allows bands to raise money from their fans to record a record, and fans get a copy of the record they finance along with exclusive access.

  • Trulycan

    I have thought this for years! I have discovered artists I have never heard of before and downloaded their music, then bought the CD.

  • Anonymous

    “Don’t forget that it takes thousands of dollars to record an entire album”

    Yeah, thousands of dollars!

    Or, less dramatically, any computer from the last 10 years with a built-in audio jack.

  • Anonymous

    *edit: Audio-in jack.

  • freetard

    “if anything, this article proves just the opposite.”
    ———————

    this article doesn’t prove anything. it’s one oafish-looking nobody’s opinion on file sharing. no more, no less.

  • K

    In fact I stopped buying CDs altogether as well. I’m waiting for a better format. Basically I want to get a real hifi product and not the maxed-out crap they (the studios) produce these days. Until we arrive there, I’ll serve myself with free music from torrents.

    “The Loudness War”
    http://turnmeup.org/

  • Paul

    Amen!

  • Someone

    Even if P2P were detrimental in general, artists like Zabriskie ‘get it’.

    They don’t claim they made “Millions of potential losses” and try to sue people into forcing to give it to them. They find their own way to use the current trends to their favor and cater to the potential clients.

    Good job, and good luck Zabriskie.

  • Dr. Jae of VUrbia.com…Life in the Entertainment Age

    This question that we are discussing is the source of one the most heated debates right now in this the digital entertainment age.

    I have been a music industry professional for more than 20 years and have been privileged to participate in just about every aspect of our business. I believe that the new “social economy” where music has become “free” has done a lot of good which allows a new line of independent artists to have a world-wide platform from which to display their talents and works and to let their voices be heard. How artist wield this new power is also up for discussion ie “where is our Marvin Gaye, and Bob Dylan”. “With wars and socio-economic issues breaking out all over the world, where are the artists who are documenting WHAT”S GOIN’ ON?” Get my drift? More conversation on this another time…….

    As with any open market which is unregulated, you will encounter a myriad of products to file through before anything touches a nerve. When you do discover a song (art)that draws you in, it will undoubtedly be the product of someone who painstakingly took the time to connect with what was on their mind, then he or she skillfully wrote those thoughts down and crafted lyrics that stated an aspect of the human condition ,that we hold common as people, in a UNIQUE and creative way. Then they found a way to use the technology (which no matter what DOES carry a cost and requires a high degree of skill) to DOCUMENT (record, overdub, mix and master)this thought in a caring way with the highest level of musicianship, craftsmanship,and fidelity that artist was humanly capable of. All of this performed in an attempt to share a glimpse of life, from the artist’s perspective, with other human beings who may have missed it during the process of conducting the order of their lives.

    Listen, Water should be free. It is the most abundant natural resource on our planet; yet we pay for it. It is a utility. It costs money to process in order for us to be able to benefit from it. We buy it in bottles. There are communities and families who depend on the jobs which are a result of our need to access water. What if water became free? How would we keep it fresh? Could we depend on untrained people to process the water for us? What about the families of the people who produced the water we needed?

    When you buy bottled water, they don’t let you get a couple of free bottles to try it out first do they? A company who did that too much would certainly not survive.

    OK so I know that you are saying well music is not the same as water, and you are probably correct. But have you ever thought about what the world would be like WITHOUT great and inspiring music? I think the world would feel a tremendous sense of loss. Music is for the enrichment of the human spirit. Without it we would feel less human.

    I find that there is enough access to free music via streaming online to justify the “try it before you buy it” line of thought.

    Perhaps music should become a utility like water. We all just pay our monthly (music) utility bill and go freaking nuts downloading, using , and sharing all the tunes that we love with one another.

  • Dr. Jae of VUrbia.com…Life in the Entertainment Age

    This question that we are discussing is the source of one the most heated debates right now in this the digital entertainment age.

    I have been a music industry professional for more than 20 years and have been privileged to participate in just about every aspect of our business. I believe that the new “social economy” where music has become “free” has done a lot of good which allows a new line of independent artists to have a world-wide platform from which to display their talents and works and to let their voices be heard. How artist wield this new power is also up for discussion ie “where is our Marvin Gaye, and Bob Dylan”. “With wars and socio-economic issues breaking out all over the world, where are the artists who are documenting WHAT”S GOIN’ ON?” Get my drift? More conversation on this another time…….

    As with any open market which is unregulated, you will encounter a myriad of products to file through before anything touches a nerve. When you do discover a song (art)that draws you in, it will undoubtedly be the product of someone who painstakingly took the time to connect with what was on their mind, then he or she skillfully wrote those thoughts down and crafted lyrics that stated an aspect of the human condition ,that we hold common as people, in a UNIQUE and creative way. Then they found a way to use the technology (which no matter what DOES carry a cost and requires a high degree of skill) to DOCUMENT (record, overdub, mix and master)this thought in a caring way with the highest level of musicianship, craftsmanship,and fidelity that artist was humanly capable of. All of this performed in an attempt to share a glimpse of life, from the artist’s perspective, with other human beings who may have missed it during the process of conducting the order of their lives.

    Listen, Water should be free. It is the most abundant natural resource on our planet; yet we pay for it. It is a utility. It costs money to process in order for us to be able to benefit from it. We buy it in bottles. There are communities and families who depend on the jobs which are a result of our need to access water. What if water became free? How would we keep it fresh? Could we depend on untrained people to process the water for us? What about the families of the people who produced the water we needed?

    When you buy bottled water, they don’t let you get a couple of free bottles to try it out first do they? A company who did that too much would certainly not survive.

    OK so I know that you are saying well music is not the same as water, and you are probably correct. But have you ever thought about what the world would be like WITHOUT great and inspiring music? I think the world would feel a tremendous sense of loss. Music is for the enrichment of the human spirit. Without it we would feel less human.

    I find that there is enough access to free music via streaming online to justify the “try it before you buy it” line of thought.

    Perhaps music should become a utility like water. We all just pay our monthly (music) utility bill and go freaking nuts downloading, using , and sharing all the tunes that we love with one another.

    The people whose role it is to discover music must enable music to progress by supporting (by approving,sharing,participating and purchasing) artists’ work. Artists must re-commit themselves to creating great musical work and continuing to raise the bar regarding their personal artistic growth. Websites where digital music can be accessed must work to allow space to musical visionaries who merit special attention, and to streamline the discoverers’ browsing experience by eliminating alot of the lower quality, devoid of creativity crap that inhibits great work from being discovered.

    Just because technology has made it easy for people to record, doesn’t mean that their latest purchase at Guitar Center qualifies them as artists. Especially, when there are talented people who have committed their lives and risked everything to be worthy of the hard task of discovering great music and great artists.

    Let’s talk about it.

    - Jesse (Dr. Jae) Tolbert,COO
    Vurbia.com…Life in the Entertainment Age

  • Dr. Jae of VUrbia.com…Life in the Entertainment Age

    I am on Twitter as vurbia_ent and Digg as vurbia.

    Really, Let’s talk

  • Memoran

    re: Dr. Jae

    “Just because technology has made it easy for people to record, doesn’t mean that their latest purchase at Guitar Center qualifies them as artists.”

    Yes it does. Everyone is an artist. It’s up to you whether you like what they create or not.

  • Dr. Jae of VUrbia.com…Life in the Entertainment Age

    Look, the fact that people can record and hold their egos high and proclaim their identities as artists is admirable. The proof is in the work. why don’t you go out to the garage and build a car and put it out on the market and see if people like it. You probably would not bother because the market will not bare your efforts, and you might go broke trying to prove your point. I really do appreciate your having taken time to read my entry, but I really don’t think you got the point.

    Peace & love,

    Dr. Jae

  • Memoran

    re: Dr. Jae

    yeah, you’re right. if you make a song no one wants to hear, no one will listen or buy it. doesn’t mean it’s not art. bad art, sure. to you. but still art.

    you’re the one with the inflated ego, calling art you don’t like “not art.”

  • Brian P

    Dr. Jae, if I’m reading what you’re saying correctly, you’re arguing that the problem with digital music being free is that many people involved in the production of it will lose their jobs, the people who’ve “committed their lives to discovering great music and great artists.”

    What we’re arguing is that a) people like this aren’t doing their jobs well enough, and b) free digital music makes these people redundant. I don’t need these people to sort through music and decide what’s not worth my time anymore. Besides, the people you’re defending who’re “discovering” new artists and pre-packaging them for me are doing a lousy job and I don’t like what they’re discovering. They’re the ones trying to shove the Pussycat Dolls and the new U2 album down my throat, and I’m not interested. What digital music really means is that I can do the job of “discovering great music and great artists” that I’m interested in better than you can.

  • Dr. Jae of VUrbia.com…Life in the Entertainment Age

    OK. First in response to Memoran. Crap is crap. Call it what you like. I was not making ANY judements as to what is art or what is not. In response to Brian P. It appears to me that we need to add some definitions here. Creators = people who conceive art in all of its’ various forms. Discoverers = people who discover artists and their works. Brian, I feel exactly as you do. We no longer need o have these old thinking, greedy record executives who don’t even listen to music be the deciding factor as to what we are delivered to our listening devices. We can now do it ourselves. You did not get what I was saying and perhaps that was my fault. I apologize if I was not clear.

    You have to admit though that there IS a lot of crap our there that you wish you did not have to filter through to find something truly inspiring to you.

    Peace & love,

    Dr. Jae

  • Memoran

    dude, come on, now. don’t be so narrow minded. everyone has different tastes. crap is not crap. there’s no such thing as good music or bad music. only music you like and music you don’t.

    if you didn’t have to sift through the “crap,” how would you know what was good? i thought searching for good music was part of the fun. you want all the music you don’t personally like to disappear so you don’t have to do the work anymore?

  • Dr. Jae of VUrbia.com…Life in the Entertainment Age

    Dude, I like you. You posses passion. Hopefully, you are a creator of great music, who pours out his soul in an attempt to meet your potential as an artist and dedicated your life (a career) to that. Moreover, I sincerely hope that you are able to make a living through your art that amply sustains your lifestyle and that of your family.

    We got off track in our discourse. My blog is about artists doing the work they do and having to give it away for free, and finding ways to expose the artists who are doing exemplary musical work in all styles and genre. My initial entry was 11 paragraphs. We have been going back and forth (I really did enjoy it) about the last paragraph.

    I respect you opinion. Set the bar high. Uphold your standards.

    Respectfully,

    Dr. Jae

  • Pingback: makin's posterous - Home

  • jake

    Chris Zabriskie?

    who???

    last fm plays, most popular track last week, 58

    big time

  • Richard Hertz

    I discovered Chris Zabriskie through the indie/rock playlist Feb. 2008.

    It was that reason I purchased a couple of albums through Amazon. When I take my son to Disney this summer I hope he’s playing a show in Orlando, as I would go and pay to watch him play.

    Regardless of the scale of success. He’s gained a fan. +1 is better than 0 or -1.

  • ForTheHateOfCopyright

    yeah RIAA, your “music” will die with you, and good riddance! good for Chris Zabriskie doing music how it should be!

  • GDDe

    jake:

    here’s a comment from digg for you…

    It’s funny, When big names like Reznor, Joss Stone, or radiohead speak in favour of filesharing, the antiP2P crowd say: “They’re just saying that because they can afford to, think of the smaller artists!”

    When smaller artists do it, they say “I’ve never heard of them, so who cares what they have to say.”

  • Ellito

    NOES if people listen to good music and let the crappy music company’s die MTV will go out of buisness and there will be no more TnA reality shows… What was the M in MTV for anyway..

  • Pingback: Bookmarks for March 13th - March 18th | The Lonely Savage

  • Phobe Lexx

    More….More….More

  • Marc

    I totally agree with this article and have always believed that mp3′s and file sharing would ultimately dismantle the corporate strangle hold of music and promote more artistic freedom. My main concern is peoples increasing tolerance of music with diminished sound quality resulting from compressed formats such as mp3′s.

  • Filene

    Giving away some music as a promotional tool may be a good idea – but not every song off of your album?

    If an artist spends money and records in a studio,pays session musicians,mixes the song, and masters it – this can be
    expensive on a per song basis.

    On the other hand if the artist does all the work on their own then production cost is less and giving away all their music makes sense.

  • Project M

    The band should decide if its going to be high quality file or just a below standard download.Just enough to hook the buyer.

    Then you are also trusting that most of the people downloading will say “hey I’ve downloaded enough of this bands music for free its time I buy the album.”

    Analogy: If a new restaurant gave out all of their food away for free day after day – why would a customer come in and say let me pay for this?

    Of course the name of the restaurant will be buzzing – Free food but one day they will have to make money even to continue to give away free food.

  • Lobe

    Personally yes I downloaded enough free music to build a pretty tasty library of music. Enough where I don’t have to buy an album from any one artist.

    But I use to buy downloads from the real player store before I knew about about file sharing – they have 30 second samples of music – usually that was enough for me to make a purchase.

    Getting the whole song is like getting the milk so why buy the cow?

  • Smitty

    I wish the auto industry would adapt this policy!

  • John

    Maybe up to say 2000 miles! Lol – Cool would like Phantom.

  • Timothy S

    Give away your demonstration recordings cool use that data to determine if you should go spend money to polish the song.Build mailing list, find out who is listening to you etc.

    When you have enough for an album. Release high quality versions of the songs. Your die hard fans would appreciate a sonically pleasing song.

    Free giveaways is a marketing technique but ultimately you have to sell something.

    Like the free carpet cleaning – but in the end you would have to pay to have addition rooms cleaned. At least you would see that you will be getting an excellent job done.

  • Pingback: Jessie

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.