TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

BitTorrent Surf Turns a Chrome Browser Into a BitTorrent Client

A brand new Chrome extension from the makers of uTorrent turns the popular browser into an easy-to -use BitTorrent client with just a couple of clicks. BitTorrent Inc. say they have been working on the software for the last six months and inform TorrentFreak that the development came about for the same reasons that Bram Cohen first invented BitTorrent – to move large, rich media files easily across the Internet.

From its humble beginnings more than 11 years ago, BitTorrent has turned into one of the main generators of Internet traffic. Shifting hundreds of petabytes of data across cyberspace every day, torrents have become a daily activity for millions of people.

The protocol’s most popular client, uTorrent, currently facilitates the file transfers of more than 125 million active users and remains the weapon of choice for many advanced torrent fans.

However, BitTorrent Inc.’s flagship client now has a little brother that can be installed with a couple of clicks and is ideal for both advanced users in a rush and those stepping out into the torrent world for the first time.

Surflogo

BitTorrent Surf is currently an extension for the Chrome web browser although Mozilla fans can relax since a Firefox version is reportedly on the way. Available from the Chrome webstore, BitTorrent Surf integrates a torrent client and torrent search directly into the browser, one that requires little to no setup and hides all the complicated stuff away.

Once installed with a single click, BitTorrent Surf adds a round blue button to the top right hand corner of Chrome and with a click the tool is activated. Simply type the name of the material required into the box and the client goes off and does its own search and returns the results.

BitTorrentSurf1

A single click on one of the green arrows will download a .torrent file and start the transfer of the chosen material straightaway, dumping the contents into Chrome’s default download folder. But we can do a little better than that.

Straight out of the box BitTorrent Surf only pulls torrents from Google and the Internet Archive but most major search engines and indexes can be added with ease. Simply click the “Search Settings” button followed by “Add Site from URL”, then enter the web address of your favorite public torrent index.

We added most of the sites from our latest Top 10 list with the exception of Torrentz and EZTV which were rejected, probably due to the way they’re set up. If in doubt, click the ‘Notifications’ button after your actions to check for problems. Once entered, the selected torrent indexes can be switched on or off at will.

Surf2

While basic information alone is fine if a user doesn’t care about seeing all the extra bells and whistles, there are always a few extra details that one needs in order to make a good choice about which torrent to jump on. BitTorrent Surf solves this problem with the signal graphic placed directly to the left of the download button on each torrent. Simply hover over these once the torrents appear in the search and the health of the torrent will be revealed.

Surf3

“We created BitTorrent Surf to meet the needs of new and novice users looking for a simpler torrenting experience, by seamlessly combining the interaction of search and download. Market research and user testing proved to us there was a real need for new web-based ways to use BitTorrent,” David Hilborn, Product Manager for BitTorrent Surf, told TorrentFreak.

“Everywhere you look in the digital space, there is new demand for a technology that can faster facilitate the rapid transfer of large files. From the Ultra HD / 4k TVs on display at CES this week, to the amount of HD video and photography we’re making with our phones and tablets, there’s never been more demand for a protocol like BitTorrent.”

Matt Mason, VP of Marketing at BitTorrent Inc., says that the cut-down Surf client takes torrents back to their roots.

“We created BitTorrent Surf for the same reason Bram originally created BitTorrent, as an efficient way to move large, rich media across the Internet. HTTP falls short on this front and the Internet needs this,” Mason explains.

“Surf represents the continuing evolution of that story, and we continue to work with our users, CE partners, content creators and other technology companies to deliver distributed products that make the Internet a better place to be for all of us.”

All in all, Surf is a nice addition to the uTorrent/BitTorrent family, especially for novices and those who prefer to grab a quick download without firing up a full torrent client. Currently in Alpha, Surf will clearly undergo improvements before it becomes a fully-finished product.

Surf can be downloaded here. Get Chrome here if you don’t already have it.


BitTorrent Surf

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Xult

    In other words
    A Toolbar.
    Stick to 2.2.1

    • Guest

      A tool anyway.
      Still, it’s nice to see that bittorrent is not only alive and well, but expanding.
      Seems all the frightening techniques by the MAFIAA ain’t working.

      • Xult

        I totaly agree :)

        • Gguest

          lol

          All the index websites are on MAFIAA’s ban list.

        • Tactical Nuclear Penguin

          Warning, Julia’s link is to spam, Flagged.

        • Tornamento

          Interesting but…
          Opera (another browser) already was able to download torrents, many years ago,
          it is not so friendly to use, but still.

      • Who

        most toolbar’s CAN be TRACKED! don’t use this if you don’t wan to take the chance.

        • What

          Please… if you download torrents they can see what “peers” are downloading a torrent… they just have to also download the torrent or host the torrent… If you dont want that use a proxy or VPN. So browser-plugin or client if you dont use a VPN or proxy your IP can bee seen.

        • Anonymous

          I believe he is referring to the toolbar makers snooping on your privacy besides the RIAA.

        • Who

          @Anonymous: yes that is what I meant. sorry if I wasn’t clear enough.

        • enzofloc

          Okay, i’m paranoid enough to think that the toolbar is made or is in cahoots with MAFIAA. Is there anyway of preventing or dodging the snoop?

      • Pelham123

        “Still, it’s nice to see that bittorrent is not only alive and well, but expanding.”

        Never doubt. If push comes to shove, antitrust charges will rip apart its opponents first. It will only go away when the kids invent something even better.

    • Fnarsis

      Huh? And how is this a toolbar? It doesn’t get any vertical space and actually does what you want it to as oppose to showing some useless buttons you’d never use.

      It’s seems like you haven’t even installed it and just saying nonsense. So, grow a pair and install it first before saying crap that don’t make sense.

      • Xult

        Ok… just wondered how long it would take to flush out a snake..
        did not take too long…
        uT as been shit since 2.2.1

        • Someone

          You mean the ads? You can disable them all

        • Cast Away

          Utorrent has ads? I never saw any of them and I’m using that a long time ago,
          right now I’m using the newest version 3.2.3.

      • Guest321

        This is more like an extension. I think this is a great addition. One of things I missed with Chrome was Opera’s built-in ability to download torrents. Of course it won’t replace a full fledged torrent client but its mighty useful for downloading small apps and ebooks in a jiffy.

    • Guest321

      This is not a toolbar. If you call it a toolbar, might as well call all addons and extensions toolbars too. It just adds automatic torrent download functionality to Chrome, something Opera had for years.

      • Xult

        Call it what you want!
        Not needed
        Stick to 2.2.1

        • http://www.facebook.com/ArchaeologyJedi Angelina Farmer

          Then don’t download it. Wow, that was easy.

        • ash en

          2.2.1….not needed, stick to tixati.

      • Xult

        Downloading from a browser?
        Needed?

        Sorry but it is not and as not been the prefered way of downloading!
        This is a toolbar in fancy dress and anyone using it will be monitered!
        Its effing google for christs sake.
        Six strikes?
        Wont take long for you to be in court using shit like this!

        • Thousand

          That’s pure arrogance and you even love to like your own comments.

    • The_Strawbear

      Seems utterly pointless. Is the world *so* lazy it can’t be bothered to go that extra click that can help verify legitimacy of file?

      It’s looking increasingly likely that true anonymous torrenting is beyond these people, they’re spending all their time and money making these pointless gimics to appeal to the ipad generation.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      As Guest has it, this is a tool. And very conveniently one which integrates new technology into everyday use.

      The one question which remains now that the popular open source browsers are turning into the swiss army knives of the internet is just the security issue. Making a narrow-use tool secure is easy. Making a wide-spectrum one along with integrated third-party plugins secure is another story.

      See the recent Java security cockup for an example there.

  • Montisaquadeis

    There is a reason I moved away from utorrent last year.

    • Xult

      Indeed:)
      No reason to use another thing!
      Stick to 2.2.1

      • MrGeek

        im with you, xult this is why im still use old version of utorrent so nothing wrong with old version cuz it still not outdated when it come to download or upload :)

        • Xult

          Indeed :)

        • Anonymous

          Can anyone explain what is wrong with versions past 2.2.1 ??????

          Do you honestly like using versions which could have security exploits in them?

          Just change your BitTorrent Vendor if it’s really necessary.

      • Guest321

        I have switched to Transmission. Not going back to uTorrent again :)

        • Xult

          Just proves they are losing people:)

        • Skilo

          Deluge FTW

      • Derp

        That is the third time you post the exact same thing. Are you that desperate? Makes you look like a very very sad person.

        • 4Tracks

          He needs approval.

      • Jatillpirater

        Why 2.2.1? 1.6 is the bomb!

        • Mom

          1.6, REALLY??? Are you like a total noob or something?! Believe me, 0.1 alpha is where it’s really at!

      • ash en

        2.2.1??? no reason to use this, stick to tixati, a properly supported torrent client without adverts and other crap you dont need.(2.2.1 is abandonware)

    • Who

      problem is you are using Utorrent 3.0+ …..STOP using that SHIT version and use like 2.2 or older and problems solved.

      • Montisaquadeis

        I was using older v2 versions but after seeing where utorrent was headed I decided to switch to something that wasnt headed in that direction. I am currently using Tixati personally and if they start going the same route I may have to switch over to something open sourced like deluge.

      • ash en

        the problem is your still using utorrent despite it having turned to shit…..try tixati or deluge or bitspirit(or or or) tons of good torrent clients out there that arent full of bs adverts and shit.)

        tixati is my primary client its updated regularly, has proper 64bit versions and is supported by all but 1 private tracker I use(Because their tracker software is old and they wont update it to work with clients following proper torrent specs)

        honestly, why are you still using utorrent?

        its not the fastest

        its not the least bloated

        its not advert free

        2.x.x isnt supported anymore….and newer versions suck donkey cock…..

        get over it, get a real client…

    • Masau Fuku

      Same…it’s because I abandoned windows in favor of linux. qbittorrent is a fair amount better than utorrent, is cross-platform (without providing a butchered server version rather than a full fledged client) and is open source to boot. Oh, and the no ads thing. But that’s minor imo since they can be disabled anyway.

  • mikeh3775

    I have to wonder if this will continue to download if you close the browser though.

    • Me

      Yes it does.

  • Anonymous

    and how long before the entertainment industries and US law enforcement start with the same trumped up, bull shit charges that they used against the likes of Mega and dajaz1? if there is anything invented and/or made available to the public that they done like, regardless of whether what it does is legal or whether it does something totally different to what the industries say, they go screaming to the US government (Biden?) to get it shut down. on top of that, Google will be in for another kicking from US Congress and they haven’t done anything!

    • Anonymous

      Google will be in for another kicking from US Congress and they haven’t done anything!

      Google can handle an ass kicking from the government simply because they have the monies to actually, you know? FIGHT the government.

      You see how it works there?

      • Rezident_User

        “Google can handle an ass kicking from the government simply because they have the monies to actually, you know? FIGHT the government.

        You see how it works there?

        because they have the monies to actually, you know? *BUY* the government

        Fixed for you..

        • Anonymous

          because they have the monies to actually, you know? *BUY* the government

          That sir, is correct.

  • John Space

    Chrome? Wuzzat?

    • Guest321

      Still living under a rock eh?

      • John Space

        Don’t you pick on a scorpion, m’boy.

  • Skeqjabwow

    Good job killing torrents. People using this wont seed their torrents, i dont see how this is good for the community.

    • Guest

      doesn’t matter – seeding really matters only if it’s something rare/unpopular, but regular phonies will be downloading American Pie 8 Pimp Edition and it’ll be 9001 seeders

      • Guest321

        No, it does matter. New peeps who are getting into bittorrent need to develop the habit of seeding and learn its importance. We don’t need leechers, no matter where they come from.

    • Xult

      Not needed.
      Some bunch of idiots decided this was a good idea.
      Bt have never bothered to ask if something was needed.
      Just come out with bullshit like this and have a full orchestra playing in the background!
      Telling everyone it is the best thing since sliced bread!
      Not bothering to ask if anyone wanted it!
      They can stick their fanfares up their asses,
      Stick to uT 2.2.1.
      No advances have been Made from then.

      • chris_p_bacon(R.O.L.L)

        i was posting, but flicked through and wtf, someone already posted for me. i didn’t like button this but fully agree and why 2.2.1 is the best is beyond me, but i find i like it least of all because i can individually block leechers who do not share, have not found another that does this, probably is one but not this efficient. i was thinking, yep, i like mafiaa redirect, yep i like adblock, yep i like soundcloud and yep i like freemake addons, but i do not like the idea of this new add on. off topic, no, never mind

        • Truff

          “i can individually block leechers who do not share”

          You must spend all the day watching how your torrents download.

      • ash en

        your still using utorrent????

        try tixati or deluge, they are much better clients.

  • Guest

    there’s something for Firefox very similar and it existed for ages

    • Guest

      An addon? Which is?

      • http://twitter.com/DuckTheNWO ☠ NewWorldStoner ☠

        He’s probably referring to FireTorrent. Released in 2010, it is unsupported, poorly rated and only works on Firefox 3.x

        • ash en

          yet another time FF users tried to copy a feature of Opera and failed….

          funny how, no matter how many times I try and use ff or chrome or or or, i always endup back on Opera…..and this started back in the windows 9x days for me……i mean last time I used FF i had to install 78mb worth of extentions to get the features opera has by default…….WTF.

  • Maldoror

    I quite like the idea of a browser plugin, but will it let me set up a VPN or proxy? I assume yes, but I did not see it in the article.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ender-Wiggin/100000885624281 Ender Wiggin

      i was just coming to ask precisely the same question. That seems like a damned glaring omission. integrate an automatic proxying ability in this and it’s the killer ap, without it it’s little better than a honey pot attracting those too stupid to know how to protect themselves.

  • Guest

    Long time no see!

    FLAGGED

    • Guest321

      It hasn’t been that long lol. He hasn’t missed a day as far as I’m concerned.

  • Xult

    You quite the idea ??????

  • Cray

    Hmm. I think that this would require a degree of forensic investigation into the code a’fore I would yay or nay.
    How much Data is logged by the Addon? Is it migrated out to Google, or just the Company behind said Plugin?
    If, as many are, you are constantly signed into say, Facebook, G+ etc etc… Is any or all of this data, in the form of logs, DHT swarm info, IP connections etc – instantly passed onto any or all of said Big Corp ??

    Enquiring minds must enquire More methinks Me Hearties….

    Regards, Cray

  • pekikuubik

    Meh, Opera has had a built-in BitTorrent client for ages.
    The idea really isn’t as useful as it sounds.

  • http://twitter.com/stormstereo stormstereo

    “Add BitTorrent Surf (Alpha)?
    It can:
    Access all data on your computer and the websites you visit.”

    No thanks.

    • Guest232

      You know that any application that you install (including vuze,ut, bt, etc) already can access that info?

      Since surf is an extension, you just visually see it as an alert.

      It’s so weird when people who seem concerned about their privacy don’t really have a clue of how things work…

      • http://twitter.com/stormstereo stormstereo

        No, any application cannot access “all data” and “the websites I visit”.

        • Guest

          You must be delusional, any application can just read the files where your browser stores you favourites / history

        • Masau Fuku

          Only if your files (including the one storing your browsing history) are A) encrypted, B) not on that computer, or C) are read/write protected. For everything else, yes, any running application can access any file on your computer with ease – and it’s probably far easier than doing so with with a Chrome extension (I don’t use Chrome, and am unfamiliar with it’s API, but I suspect there are *some* protections to reduce this).

        • Guest

          only if your using master password, but since Chrome doesn’t have one.. good luck with that

  • Past Tense

    BitTorrent, Inc has added advertising to utorrent to make money. How is the company making money off of this?

    • Xult

      Bad publicity for them I am sorry to say!
      Bt are a well funded company who are NOT running out of money!
      They are trying to further monetize their clients.
      Without listening to their users.
      They are in danger of estranging people.

      I assume they have a think tank of geeks inventing crap like this.
      They then go over to geek admin and have an idea approved.
      They will then gain consensus by having other geeks test out their new addition.
      Test it and make sure it works.
      Then advertise it in places like TF.

  • Andrew me

    I think it is about time that governments around the world made it clear that the industry must compete with torrenting in a serious way, not overpricing the content they create and not using any form of drm, while supplying at least the same quality as a dvd rip, gosh i would even pay a small amount to get hd content from them, imagine how big a site would be if they supplied every movie ever created and movies that were in the cinema or say three months since being in the cinema.

    They would be far far bigger than facebook, actually they would probably be bigger than the top 20 websites combined, they could have an environment where people could discuss movies and share them and support them like kickstarter does. They could create a social network to rival facebook and even a store that sold merchandise. I for one am amazed that they have not taken this opportunity to completely take over the distribution of movies online, they would grow to become the biggest most profitable industry ever.

    But alas a small minority of people would lose there perceived power over there customers, they would be unable to control who sees what when and how much they pay, they would lose the ability to claim that movies were not making a profit, thereby avoiding paying massive amounts in taxes. Seriously i think governments around the world need to investigate the reasons that the likes of Hollywood do not want to make money.

    • Anon

      Andrew, markets have always balanced when the consumer says “Sell me the products/merch/files I what I want at the price I want or I will ignore your offerings and let you fail.” That’s fair to me, that, in fact, is capitalism.

      But your statement here appears to say “Give me what I want at the price I want it or I will use a fairly recent technical ability to obtain what I want for free, and in defiance of the law.”

      And you expect them to hear you and respect this? Do you feel breaking the law should be a respected market force? Really?

      There is no extortion when they offer it and you can pass on it. That’s what you can and should be doing; just have nothing to do with their products at all.

      But your position is the definition of extortion, and against the law at that, and no corporation will fold to unlawful extortion. They will turn to their respective Justice Department’s instead. You would, too. That’s simple human nature when you invest and work on something and then try to sell it and people simply copy it.

      So ignore their offerings and let them die. Infringe upon them and they will respond in kind. If you ignore them I am with you. If you infringe then I am with them. Simple.

      • Anyone

        if the restaurant overcharges I will simply cook my own dinner
        if the barber overcharges I will cut my own hair
        if itunes overcharges I will simply make my own copies

        it’s capitalism working fine

        • Anon

          Greedy, entitled, willfully blind, and desperate for better leadership.

          “piracy.”

          Tell it to the judge. (S)he’ll laugh at you, too.

        • Milkmaid

          It’s more like if a restaurant overcharges, I will walk out without paying.

          If a barber overcharges, I will walk out without paying.

          If iTunes overcharges I will download the song without paying.

          It’s capitalism turned on its head.

        • Anyone

          if I don’t use the restaurant’s service, why should I pay?
          if I don’t use the barber’s service, why should I pay?
          if I don’t use itunes’s service, why should I pay?

          will you pay me for a service I don’t provide to you?

        • Anon

          @ milkmaid.

          It’s copyright infringement. It’s the site admins currently being turned on their heads. (grin)
          Who’s next?

        • Guest

          I wonder if the MAFIAA will succeed in its quest to destroy capitalism, Democracy, and the free market?

          Probably not.

          Sorry, Anon and Milkmaid. =D

        • Guest

          Anon, you are the only greedy, entitled, willfully blind, and desperate-for-better-leadership poster here.

          The judge is laughing at YOU, bitch.

        • Milkmaid

          “Who’s next?”

          You didn’t respond to me. Want to try again?

        • Milkmaid

          @Anyone

          It’s even worse the second time around. What happened to the song you were downloading? You’ve conveniently left it out this time.

        • Anyone

          @Milkmaid
          as I said, I made my own copy (using bittorrent) instead of downloading the copy from itunes

        • Jimmy671

          @milkmaid

          I see that you have joined the family Trolling trade
          with big brother Anon.

      • Guest

        @MAFIAAnon

        What is the difference between “Sell me the products/merch/files I what I want at the price I want or I will ignore your offerings and let you fail.” and “Give me what I want at the price I want it or I will use a fairly recent technical ability to obtain what I want for free, and in defiance of the law.”, Anon?

        In both cases the industry is losing a sale because they refuse to reasonably price their products.

        Your whole premise for why piracy is wrong is because it causes “lost sales”(which it doesn’t, but let’s pretend for the sake of argument).

        Yet the former example is okay with you while the latter example is wrong? Even though they both result in a lost sale and lost sales = evil, according to you? Your logic is fallacious and hypocritical. You fail so hard at reason that you contradict your own premise.

        “There is no extortion when they offer it”

        lol, no. The copyright monopoly prices its merchandise unrealistically high, and then tries to force people in to paying it by threatening to sue them if they embrace the free market and obtain the merchandise through filesharing. That is the textbook definition of extortion.

        “But your position is the definition of extortion, and against the law”

        Andrew me’s position doesn’t have anything even remotely to do with extortion. You clearly have no idea what that word even means. Please crack open a dictionary.

        “and against the law at that”

        Just because something is against the law doesn’t mean that it’s wrong. Get that through your stupid, stupid head.

        That’s simple human nature when you invest and work on something and then try to sell it and people simply copy it.

        Oh, so what does that make all the artists who invest in and work on something, and sell it, but are perfectly okay with piracy because they’ve unplugged themselves from the copyright monopoly’s matrix and realized that sharing is a promotional tool and sales engine rather than the devil? Are you saying they’re sub-human?

        “Infringe upon them and they will respond in kind.”

        Really? If I violate the copyright on somebody’s work then they’re going to respond by violating the copyright on my work? Because that’s what “respond in kind” means, you English class dropout.

        Now here’s the part where you never reply to my comment because you’re too busy running away with your tail between your legs.

        • David_lowery

          “Your whole premise for why piracy is wrong is because it causes “lost sales”(which it doesn’t, but let’s pretend for the sake of argument). ”

          Anon’s premise is that “piracy” means “Copying someone else’s work.” That’s not what piracy is. That’s not even what the MAFIAA says it is.

          He’s here to distort the pro-copyright position by making it sound incoherent and uninformed.

        • David_lowery

          “Just because something is against the law doesn’t mean that it’s wrong. Get that through your stupid, stupid head.”

          He knows … but copying is not against the law. Even when it’s wrong. He’s lying on purpose.

      • Tactical Nuclear Penguin

        There’s plenty of extortion when DRM prevents a customer from paying the same price as elsewhere in the world and is forced to pay twice as much as the same file, whether that be software, music, movies or TV shows just because they have a different IP address.
        Price gouging by bricks & mortar stores have been going on for more than a century in my country, which thanks to the internet we have now bypassed and buy overseas and import it ourselves.
        However when it comes to digital goods being sent from the same server in say, California, we get charged twice the price because the technology allows the sellers to set the price country by country to what they think the customer is able to cough up for the goods and possibly also to not undermine their physical sales in the stores of the customer’s country.
        That’s only one of the reasons that online file sharing in my country is booming.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        All your little rant does is illuminate that the core of the problem is precisely that neither you nor any other private interest gets to tell me or anyone else what they can and can not do with their own property.

        End of story.

        And the rest of your rant is just a desperate attempt to run the insanity of this situation past the casual reader without anyone stopping to say “Hey, wait a minute”.

        One core assumption in a “free” market is that property values are absolute. So-called “Intellectual property” – the privilege for party A to tell party B and C what they can or cannot do with their property – is just a nonsense term for a set of laws which de facto abolish actual property.

        Hell, for copyright to even work, it’s actually impossible for anyone to own storage media.

        And that makes the current battle against copyright as it is currently interpreted even more serious than that little spat about british taxes on tea in 1773.

      • David_Lowery

        Don’t you get bored finding all these long-winded ways to post the same ignorant, inaccurate post over and over again? I sure get bored reading them.

        Something is not infringing just because someone calls it “infringement.” Everyone else has to agree.

        Laws are not involved in six strikes or most other parts of this discussion, so your use of the word “illegal” is inaccurate and misleading. Breaking a contract is not illegal even if you’re sued and you lose.

        “When you invest and work on something and then try to sell it and people simply copy it” you are engaged in business as usual. Everyone who works for a living knows there is no law against this.

        I know you’re a pro-piracy shill hired to discredit the other side. It still irritates me because there is a legitimate pro-copyright position that I wish were discussed here and you try to imply otherwise. On behalf of artists everywhere, fuck off.

      • Guest

        wtf?

        “Sell me the products/merch/files I what I want at the price I want or I will ignore your offerings and let you fail.” means the same thing as “Give me what I want at the price I want it or I will use a fairly recent technical ability to obtain what I want for free”

        As for “in defiance of the law,” needless to say getting something somebody is selling for free is not in defiance of the law. You admit this when you say “That’s fair to me, that, in fact, is capitalism.”

        Shopping around and bargaining are not “the definition of extortion.” That’s people’s most paranoid fear, that the MAFIAA wants us to believe that. They don’t. Butt thanks for smearing them.

        And you like your own posts? Embarrassing, dude.

      • Jimmy671

        Shame on you Anon,involving your baby sister milkmaid in MAFIAA Trolling.
        By the way milkmaid I hope you know he some times
        wears your dresses,he’s a bit kinky like that.

  • Andrew me

    After making my previous comment i realized that there was actually a very important question in there. Why does Hollywood not want to make money from their content, seriously they could be making a ton of money from the Internet but they are actually attacking it like they did the VHS. I wonder if the governments around the world should possibly be investigating this and asking why they dont want to make a bigger profit and use the tech out there that is basically free to do it.

    Is it because any system they used would be more transparent and that they would not be able to use their famous accounting methods that make it look like a movie released 30 years ago and is one of the all time most popular movies is still not making a profit. Would any new system make it clear how they are not paying taxes at all on profit they should be paying taxes on.

    Just imagine how much governments could make from legalizing torrenting for an individual at home, it would force Hollywood to compete just as vhs did. Maybe this is the argument we need to be spreading maybe this is what we should all be writing to the governments around the world.

    • Anyone

      because in a free internet EVERYONE can release any content
      they don’t fear piracy, as long as their products are pirated, they are still relevant

      they fear the moment when they become irrelevant, when they finally lose their gatekeeper role for good, when they can no longer dictate what people think and talk about

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        And this is the reason why cyberlockers suddenly got ten times the attention ordinary bittorrent sites got as soon as megaupload started acting as an alternative venue for artists to promote.

        DMCA compliance be damned.

    • chris_p_bacon(R.O.L.L)

      been saying the same for years myself. why don’t they embrace bit torrent?. nobody seems to have the answer, but if you really think about it, it makes perfect sense indeed. maybe a lobby group could gather some momentum and get things heard but inertia is so nice when they are still creaming off of their system and the governments full backing. to give in now would just kill them and reduce their products to worthless pieces of merchandise that could be purchased really cheaply, and that just would not do

  • commenter8

    TF’s reporting seems woefully incomplete, especially since the prior article describes Verizon’s six strikes system and the lawsuits that may arise after the sixth strike. Is this extension safe, with built-in and effective privacy and security features, or is it simply a faster path through the six strikes system?

    • Anyone

      it’s a regular bittorrent client, you are just as exposed with it as with any other client
      if you want protection get a VPN, that will hide your IP when using this client or any other

      • Xult

        Well said :)

    • Xult

      Simply a quicker way to be found!
      Anyone using google at all now days mustt be made aware of the google bubble.
      I have not used google for several years due to this.
      Ixquick is my recommended search engine.
      And their are several others equally as ggod.
      Also you get better search results because the websites have not been googled!

      • Who

        https://www.ixquick.com/eng/privacy-policy.html

        read @ the bottom under information sharing. it says that they WILL share your personal information. so JUST HOW SAFE is that?

        FULL PRIVACY means that NO personal information is given out PERIOD.

        • Xult

          Good point. I agree!
          But where did I say you would remain anonymous?
          Just get better search results than from google.

          No bubble!
          And not in league!

          Anyways.. do not use google.. use another.
          Take your choice.

        • Who

          @Xult: YEP you did imply that they are DAM good…..and yes there site does say that they DON’T keep a record of YOU (IP Im guessing is what they meant)

          IF SO…..they Y make the statement in the privacy policy were they WILL hand over your information when requested by a warrant? makes no sense.

          but ya the idea is STOP using google.

    • Guest

      Like everything from Google, Chrome is spyware. I’d feel uneasy about using this extension on that basis alone.

      • NoGoogleTrackingAllowed

        The fact that so many people use Chrome shows how many people are just clueless or simply do not care about Google tracking everything they do (and them selling that info).

        Why help Google track you?
        Dumb.

        Have never installed Chrome.
        Apparently people have short memories about the stink raised about all the obvious tracking built into Chrome from the beginning.

        Un-installed Google Earth when I saw how many times a day it checked for updates.
        It was simply reporting-in with an IP address and other info.
        There was no need for hourly updates.
        Good way to keep your IP address fixed for those who do not have fixed IP addresses.
        Makes it easier for Google to track you if your pesky IP address does not change.

        Chrome = browser for the clueless iMoron generation.

  • http://twitter.com/MidoThePirate Ahmed Omar

    great one …finally good news after a very long time :)

  • Jeff Bekcer

    I’m too comfortable with my flexget with Transmission in a VPN-ified LXC to try it out.

    .torrent to Transmission > whatever this is.

  • Guest

    I have install the extension and when trying to use a magnets file it directe me to TORQUE a application I can find on my hard drive and has become default.
    Now Transmission is no default. This look fishy. Got me sweating.

    • Xult

      Fishy?
      How many times do I have to say that this is shit.
      Do not use it.
      Google = spy!
      Never use a browser for downloading for effs sake.

      • Guest

        “How many times do I have to say that this is shit.”

        Apparently 20,000.

  • Shlomoberg Goldstein

    >Bram Cohen
    Yes goyim, I promise I won’t turn your info in to the RIAA

    • Jerry Levinbloomstein

      Oy vey! Do you have proof of the potential tsorres or is this just a shtick?

  • Guest

    Ok I found more about Torque is part of the extension but it takes over. I found him at library.application support as a full app I use mac and is gone. here is a link of what it is.
    http://blog.bittorrent.com/2012/07/06/introducing-bittorrent-torque/

  • http://www.facebook.com/SapientDev Marcelo Delgado

    The new version has the bottom half of the interface as one big ad. Removed it instantly.

    • Goodguest

      I don’t see any ads. It looks like news ish kinda things. They may use it for ads later on but for now there is no ads.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ArchaeologyJedi Angelina Farmer

    Of course you can you know, BUY things instead of torrenting them. Then you don’t have to worry or bitch about crap like this and you can spend your time trolling elsewhere.

    • ScrewEwe2

      No Angelina, you can spend your time trolling elsewhere.

    • Guest

      Which I do. Then I have to deal with idiots like you who assume that anyone who visits the site must torrent. For what it’s worth, I don’t have torrent clients on my computer. But what would you know, industry cocksucker.

    • Jimmy671

      My! My!
      The attack of the girlie Trolls,carry on Angie.

  • Fuck SOPA

    RIP Aaron Swartz

    • ScrewEwe2

      We owe him a lot. “Aaron Swartz was the co-founder of Demand Progress, which launched the campaign against the Internet censorship bills (SOPA/PIPA)…”

      Link to his site: http://www.aaronsw.com/

      “Aaron Swartz was an American programmer, writer, political organizer, and Internet activist. On 19 July 2011 he was arrested for allegedly harvesting academic journal articles from JSTOR”

      Link to the Wiki on Aaron Swartz: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz

      Thanks for giving me the idea of signing up for a free JSTOR account, through which you can legally download academic journals and books. The first one I’m going to read is: ‘Net Loss, Internet Prophets, Private Profits, and the Costs to Community’ By Nathan Newman, through Penn State Press . Being a high school dropout, maybe I can learnify myself some.

      Helping each other learn, has always meant the most to me, about being a TorrentFreaker.

  • commenter8

    So now that we know that Surf is an ad-filled fast track to “six strikes” for the “new and novice users”, on to more interesting news…

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261377/Porn-study-scrapped-researchers-failed-ANY-20-males-hadn-t-watched-it.html

    A study into how porn affects men had to be scrapped and radically rethought after experts failed to find any young men who had not watched it.

    Originally researchers at the University of Montreal wanted to compare the behavior of men who viewed sexually explicit material with those who had never looked at it all.

    Professor Simon Louis Lajeunesse says he had to drastically rethink his study after failing to find any male volunteers who had never viewed porn.  [...] Lajeunesse had to refocus his study on the porn viewing behaviors of his subjects. [...] single men typically spend about 40 minutes viewing porn three times a week, while men in committed relationships averaged 20 minute porn viewing sessions 1.7 times a week. Lajeunesse found most boys seek out pornographic material by the age of 10, when they are most sexually curious. However, they quickly discard what they don’t like and find offensive. [...]

    All test subjects said they supported gender equality and felt victimized by rhetoric demonizing pornography. ‘Pornography hasn’t changed their perception of women or their relationship which they all want as harmonious and fulfilling as possible,’ said Lajeunesse. [...]

    • Jimmy671

      At my age I don’t give a damn about Porn ;-)

  • ScrewEwe2

    This extension can access:
    All data on your computer and the websites you visit.
    Stay away, that’s all i have to say.

    • Anyone

      so can any other program you install

      • ScrewEwe2

        I would have to disagree that any program you install can access all data on your computer. That’s a pretty broad brush you’re painting with, IMO.

        Google Desktop was a program that could access and send way too much private data back to Google, but I’m not too concerned that JetAudio is collecting and sending back information about all the data on my computer back to Cowon and from there to who knows where. I’m not paranoid about using Google as a search engine, or most of it’s other great offerings, but I did install Google+ for a short while last year. I was amazed, no, horrified by how much information Google was storing in it’s databases about me and some old contacts I knew back in 2004, which was gleaned from an old computer I had, that had Google Desktop installed on it for about an hour and a half.

        In the case of this extension “BitTorrent Surf”, a Google Chrome extension, if it say’s that the extension can access “All data on your computer and the websites you visit”, I will make the decision to steer clear of it and continue to use µTorrent as my torrenting application, because I know it’s not collecting all the data on my computer for who knows what purpose. As has been stated, the Opera browser can torrent, but I don’t use it for that.

        I had stubbornly been using µTorrent v.2.0.1.19078 until TF did an article on September 21, 2012 about a new build, µTorrent v.3.3.0. 28038 Alpha, and have been using it since then. No Ads and works great, and I have it set to not automatically update.

        Here is that article: http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-takes-measures-to-prevent-mass-monitoring-of-downloads-120921/

  • Robert

    Why do people use Chrome in the first place and not Firefox? Chrome is part of Google whose business model is to sell user data. People complain that Firefox is slow, but it’s just as fast as Chrome. The UI is more polished than Chrome. What’s not to like? Never understood why the heck Chrome took off and Firefox dropped in market share.

    Chrome + Torrents = Good idea (yea right!)

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.