TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Court Acquits BitTorrent User Citing Faulty Evidence

The Lithuanian anti-piracy outfit LANVA has lost its case against a user of the prominent BitTorrent tracker LinkoManija.net. After being accused of sharing Windows 7 Ultimate, the defendant walked free when the court decided that uTorrent is not a certified evidence gathering tool.

Last year LANVA reported the IP-addresses of 106 users of the country’s largest BitTorrent site to the police. The anti-piracy group claimed that the site’s users were sharing a copy of the Windows 7 Ultimate operating system and took action on behalf of Microsoft without notifying the software company.

The self-proclaimed investigators evidence consisted of a screenshot of peers as listed by uTorrent. The evidence was gathered in conjunction with a local police officer, but none of the parties involved was authorized to conduct an investigation of this kind.

LANVA nevertheless took one of the 106 users to court, hoping to set a favorable precedent that would allow them to go after other alleged copyright infringers. The case went before the courts and the verdict handed down today was not the one the anti-piracy outfit had hoped for.

Citing faulty evidence, the District Court judge closed the case and fully acquitted the sole defendant Sergej Bernotas. The judge stated that LANVA had no right to collect and use the information they gathered. In addition, the judge ruled that such evidence gathering techniques have to be approved before they can be used.

Sergej Bernotas Came Out As a Winner

lanva

For now, uTorrent and for that matter all other BitTorrent clients remain uncertified as proper evidence collection tools. To be used as such, the developers would also have to give their approval, something that obviously didn’t happen in this case.

At the court hearing it also became clear that the police officer involved had no IT experience and simply carried out what LANVA told him to. When the policeman was asked what tools he used to gather evidence he replied “a computer” resulting in laughs from the audience.

Aside from the action against several LinkoManija users, the alleged operator of the site is also facing legal action from LANVA and Microsoft. In January software giant Microsoft sued the alleged operator, demanding $43 million from the defendant and his company for assisting in the illegal distribution of Office 2003 and 2007.

The case against the operator is still ongoing, but today’s ruling makes it unlikely that LANVA will be successful in pursuing the site’s users. The anti-piracy outfit does have the option to appeal, but if they do the case won’t be heard before the coming winter.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Trixx

    fly be free… be safe..

    used against you? it’s just a TOY to play with torrents.. nothing wrong with that.

  • Mr Afghanistan

    LANVA = owned :P

  • ES3

    LM FTW! P.S. LOL @ COP, computer :D

  • Ninja

    One word. Owned.

    It’d be a joke if utorrent became a certified proof gathering tool for a myriad of reasons….

  • SirReal

    Wow, seems its all good news so far today!! LOL @ “a computer”

  • Lithuanian

    Ha! We win! LANVA -lame !

  • Arb

    wow for once a judge without his head up his ass

  • Sam

    Who downloads a pirated operating system? Ubuntu is a excellent alternative to windows. People should just use Linux if they aren`t going to pay 200$ for windows rather than pirate an entire OS.

  • Pan or Rama

    OMG – Stop the press
    Another judge they forgot to bribe!

  • Binary Bandit

    Micrsoft is suing the website??? LOL I bet you can find the same file using Bing. What a great defence that would be lol.

  • Binary Bandit

    Microsoft is suing the website??? LOL I bet you can find the same file using Bing. What a great defense that would be lol.

  • Delphinas

    LANVA lame haha :D Linkomanija FTW!

  • Anonymous

    uTorrent can’t be used as a evidence tool, and if it did someone could spread magnet links which will put someone in a bittorrent swarm (not downloading anything but will show them there) without them knowing or having a torrent client at all, this would lead to a bunch of false lawsuits and negate it.

  • Colin

    ^_^ “a computer” ^_^

  • Lachlan Hunt

    “[LANVA] took action on behalf of Microsoft without notifying the software company.”

    Is that claim really true? Did they really think they – an unaffiliated 3rd party – could take any action whatsoever against purported infringement for something that they themselves neither have any copyright claim over, nor even represent those that do? Seriously, what were they thinking?!

  • Lithuanian

    Lithuania is a country of fabulous miricles I woudn’t suprise if all 105 computers were confiscated and Lanva would win the fight because the truth is not in the richiuosness it’s in the money. And if ms give’s money lanva will win… Fuck lithuanin goverment and their pedofiles

  • Pingback: Second Win Today! (Lithuania) | eZee.se - Lets Make Things eZee!

  • yessuz

    …………………./´¯/)
    ………………..,/¯../
    ………………./…./
    …………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
    ………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
    ……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
    ………\……………..’…../
    ……….”…\………. _.·´
    …………\…………..(
    …………..\………….\…

  • yessuz

    @15 – yes, that’s true. Soon after the announcement of the “106 case” MS reported (in some interviews of the representatives) that they knew nothing about LANVA actions.
    @10: year, try this: “Microsoft Windows 7 ULTIMATE x86 Integrated February 2010 OEM DVD-BIE”

  • aha

    Indeed Microsoft didn’t knew about it anything. LANVA said that Microsoft gave them files (or the rights) to pirate in order to catch actual pirates who download it. Microsoft representative in coutrary said that they didn’t gave anyone the rights to pirate anything they own for any purposes, but they expressed believe that LANVA do what they should. When asked if it’s illegal to download Win7 version from torrent, the representative said that actually company-end_user deal begins after user accepts the licence. If it’s illegal to download OS the representative didn’t knew just told that it is not recommended.

  • Einstein

    Windows 7 is available for free and legally on the internet!!:
    http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/07/13/download-windows-7-rtm-build-7600-16384-x64-64-bit-iso-images/
    The fact that they were pushing this case show how stupid and ignorant anti-piracy outfits are.
    Still, they come up with new ways to fight the so-called “piracy” all the time. I was just listening to the radio where they were announcing a “hotline” (phone number) where people can report “piracy” and be rewarded up to one million dollar$!

  • nobadnews

    So they were not even acting on behalf of Microsoft? Microsoft don’t give a crap if people download their OS, it helps keep them well ahead of the insignificant minority yet these morons decided to take it upon themselves to sue? It should have been thrown out due to the lack of a proper complaint by either the rights holder or an AUTHORIZED agent of the rights holder, never mind the fact they used utorrent to “gather evidence”.

  • Anonymous

    FTA: “To be used as such, the developers would also have to give their approval, something that obviously didn’t happen in this case.”

    Sorry? what a load of crap.

  • Anonymous

    “OMG – Stop the press
    Another judge they forgot to bribe!”

    That made me laugh LOL.

    People really need to stop insisting that bribery is occurring when they don’t know shit about shit.

    The worst thing is that a lot of these cases are going against the plaintiffs (interests acting on behalf of copyright holders – not in this case though obviously lol). Even though it’s no evidence whatsoever if cases went in the favour of plaintiffs one could justify the imagination that this is going on more … but THE SUPPOSED PEOPLE OFFERING THE SUPPOSED BRIBES DONT SEEM TO BE WINNING VERY MANY CASES.

  • Anonymous

    @idiot: “So they were not even acting on behalf of Microsoft? Microsoft don’t give a crap if people download their OS, it helps keep them well ahead of the insignificant minority yet these morons decided to take it upon themselves to sue?”

    Uh, yeah, that must be why they keep spending money on creating ever more intricate anti-piracy features and prosecuting pirates.

    Makes perfect sense.

  • kj

    #23

    the ruling of Jamie Thomas and The Pirate Bay are eg. – brutal and inhuman 1.92 million fine and jail. it’s obviously ruled in favor of the kopilobbyist and of judge bride. Period. lol

    Obvious hypocrite is obvious

  • Pingback: Aromatherapy Enchances Your Immune System : Scents Obsession

  • Anonymous

    “the ruling of Jamie Thomas and The Pirate Bay are eg. – brutal and inhuman 1.92 million fine and jail. it’s obviously ruled in favor of the kopilobbyist and of judge bride. Period. lol”

    So what? Where is the evidence for bribery in that?

    And what part of my comment did you find “hypocritical”. Do you even know the meaning of the word?

  • Unauthorized Content Consumer

    Oh, and uh…yeah.

  • Anonymous

    “Oh, and uh…yeah.”

    Thats easily the most intelligent thing you’ve said here! Congrats!

  • General Snus

    lol @ “computer”!!!

    Any audio or video of the trial? Probably not in a language I’d understand, but I still think it’d be funny to hear the audience reaction (and of course the word for computer sounds similar in many languages I’ve heard)

  • kj

    #27

    Where is the evidence for no bribery in that?

  • Anonymous

    “Where is the evidence for no bribery in that?”

    There is none – but apparently your so dumbassed that you think there bribery has occurred despite no evidence.

    Just as you cannot prove a negative it makes no sense at all to argue that bribery has occurred because there is no evidence that it did not occur.

    Or maybe your just the kind of person that has thoughts and then assumes they must have happened – just because you imagined it could have.

  • Pingback: Pirate Home Page » Court Acquits BitTorrent User Citing Faulty Evidence

  • Pingback: CREDIGY - The People’s Court – Judge Milian Flips out on Defendant

  • surfer

    I imagined a box of chocolate covered truffles, and nothing happened.

    and if they did, would I be infringing copyright?

    rotflmao @ ‘computer’

  • SkyBon

    LANVA = pwned. ROFL

  • Efka

    it was just a simple battle (LANVA + Police were not very clever), but the war continues! (they will get clever or they’ll have to vanish)

  • hehehe yeah…

    @ 31 and rest of your responses.

    Proof?! Why would he/she or any of us here need proof? We aren’t in a courtroom.

    Unless that said judge makes an effort to have the accuser of said accusation brought to trail for it, then it doesn’t have any relevance!

    This is a Comment-area of a public site! Not a Courtroom!

  • Anonymous

    “Proof?! Why would he/she or any of us here need proof? We aren’t in a courtroom.

    Unless that said judge makes an effort to have the accuser of said accusation brought to trail for it, then it doesn’t have any relevance!

    This is a Comment-area of a public site! Not a Courtroom!”

    Well for a start I never said anything about proving it.

    I just think it’s retarded to continue to post bold assertions about the MAFIAA and Co. bribing judges WHEN THE MAJORITY OF CASES, INCCLUDING MANY OF THOSE ASSERTED TO HAVE BRIBERY GOING ON, ARE NOT GOING IN FAVOUR OF THE MAFIAA.

    It’s also retarded to start with when there is no evidence: media reports, individuals claiming that they are offered bribes and so on.

    No evidence does not mean that people over active imaginations are therefore correct – it’s ridiculous to make the assertion based off nothing but your own paranoia.

  • lol

    Have you noticed a pattern? European courts are less susceptible to bribes and have more judges with common sense than the US.

    UK torrent site found not guilty.
    Spain torrent site found not guilty and declares P2P legal for personal use.
    Lithuania finds torrent user not guilty.

    Stick that in your pipe and smoke it cartels.

  • Edgaras

    LANVA 0WN3D ;a)

  • Pingback: La justicia absuelve al usuario del tracker LinkoManija acusado de infringir derechos de autor | ALT1040

  • PirateAnon

    The influence of teh big corporations cannot be felt in Europe, simply because we don’t have big corporations. Just local branches.
    Or maybe Europeans are more smart. Yes, I’m going with this.

  • PirateAnon

    P.S. Except the French.

  • 5fifty5

    another idiot corrupt judge.

  • Anonymous

    Note to all ‘evidence’ collection companies:

    You can’t use a general-purpose file-sharing client, close your eyes and hope. While some companies have taken an open source BitTorrent client and made minor amendments on the cheap, that’s not good enough. It needs a full code walk-through by someone the court will recognise as an expert witness, to verify that the file-sharing client does indeed behave in exactly the way you claim it does.

  • Pingback: La justicia absuelve al usuario del tracker LinkoManija acusado de infringir derechos de autor | RSS Tecnología

  • nobadnews

    @24
    “Uh, yeah, that must be why they keep spending money on creating ever more intricate anti-piracy features and prosecuting pirates.

    Makes perfect sense.”

    Obviously you’re an asshat. Microsoft do the bare minimum to get people to actually buy their software. They are well aware that the vast majority never pay for Windows, but they only care enough about it to try and get at least some of those people to buy. Other than that they couldn’t give a shit because as long as people are using Windows, they stay on top of the heap which keeps Microsoft happy, keeps the consumers happy and keeps 3rd party devs happy. They’d be stupid if they didn’t at least try to curb piracy. Microsoft are really only concerned about commercial piracy, not Joe Downloader.

    You can go back to being a retard now.

  • Pingback: Dos buenas noticias en el mundo ¿será que ya se están dando cuenta? » nosoydelincuente.pe

  • Peter

    The reason microsoft does ANYTHING
    about “piracy” is that they have to
    in order to keep the protection offered by various IP-laws . If they do nothing at all it’s the same as saying “we don’t mind” . And they really don’t mind that millions of people who can’t afford to buy a legal copy use a pirated one (India, China etc ) because having a 90% market-share is more worth than the “lost” revenue from the copies used by people who couldn’t afford it anyway .

    And my proof for this claim is the fact that easier “pirating” windows than it is stealing candy from kids.
    If they wanted to they could end the “illegal” use tomorrow .

  • from LT

    Here’s the news program archived: http://tv.lrytas.lt/index.php?cid=19&item_id=48&active=3313
    reportage about this court starts at ~30:50

  • Anonymous

    “@24 “Uh, yeah, that must be why they keep spending money on creating ever more intricate anti-piracy features and prosecuting pirates.

    Makes perfect sense.”

    Obviously you’re an asshat. Microsoft do the bare minimum to get people to actually buy their software. They are well aware that the vast majority never pay for Windows, but they only care enough about it to try and get at least some of those people to buy. Other than that they couldn’t give a shit because as long as people are using Windows, they stay on top of the heap which keeps Microsoft happy, keeps the consumers happy and keeps 3rd party devs happy. They’d be stupid if they didn’t at least try to curb piracy. Microsoft are really only concerned about commercial piracy, not Joe Downloader.

    You can go back to being a retard now.”

    You wrote all that to say you agree with @24? The only asshat here appears to be you with that attitude of throwing insults about whilst actually *agreeing* with what @24 said LOL.

  • Anonymous

    ” The reason microsoft does ANYTHING
    about “piracy” is that they have to
    in order to keep the protection offered by various IP-laws . If they do nothing at all it’s the same as saying “we don’t mind” . And they really don’t mind that millions of people who can’t afford to buy a legal copy use a pirated one (India, China etc ) because having a 90% market-share is more worth than the “lost” revenue from the copies used by people who couldn’t afford it anyway .

    And my proof for this claim is the fact that easier “pirating” windows than it is stealing candy from kids.
    If they wanted to they could end the “illegal” use tomorrow .”

    What garbage – why would MS prefer 90% market share with piracy instead of (off the top of my head) 60% share with 30% more people paying for their product?

    “The reason microsoft does ANYTHING
    about “piracy” is that they have to
    in order to keep the protection offered by various IP-laws”

    Way to make things up – you cannot find one single shred of evidence for this, legal or otherwise. No company is required to take any action at all to maintain it’s copyright or any other protections. Dimwits.

    “If they wanted to they could end the “illegal” use tomorrow .”

    Bullcrap again – name one client side based piece of software on the PC that has not had it’s copy protection circumvented.

    Peter, your whole post is so full of fail it’s ridiculous. All exmaples and evidence you give somehow managed to be the exact *opposite* of reality. Trying too hard … issue rubbed you the wrong way and you got into a bit of a tizzy? LOL

  • Pingback: Hadopi does not work in France, file-sharing legal in Spain

  • Pingback: Hadopi nie dzia?a we Francji, w Hiszpanii wspó?dzielenie plików jest legalne

  • Pingback: Vitamin manufacturing equipment | Vitamin Makers Blog

  • Pingback: solar system?

  • Borderliner

    > FTA: “To be used as such, the
    > developers would also have to give
    > their approval, something that
    > obviously didn’t happen in this
    > case.”
    > Sorry? what a load of crap.

    Not really. uT is a closed source program and nobody, except the developers, know what is really going on behind the user interface. What if some if the data it presents ain’t (completelly) correct, what if some data ain’t being shown to the user at all? Things that aren’t neccessarily a problem unless the data is being used in a court which, in essence, demands transparency and correct handling.
    It in the line of using the kitchen knife to perform a surgical operation – sure, you could do it, but would the manufacturer of the knife (assuming you bother to ask them, which in this case did not happen) also agree that his product is the right choice?

  • Anti-piracy

    I think it’s only first instance Court decision…. We need to see the decision in English there. Can Ernesto to give us this?

  • should help

    Microsoft: ‘Piracy no longer poses a threat to us’

    http://freakbits.com/microsoft-piracy-no-longer-poses-a-threat-to-us-1202

    Despite Piracy No Longer Being a Threat, Microsoft Takes Action Against It

    http://freakbits.com/despite-piracy-no-longer-being-a-threat-microsoft-takes-action-against-it-1205

  • Pingback: File-Sharing and Link Sites Declared Legal in Spain | TorrentFreak « ALL READS

  • demo

    “demanding $43 million from the defendant and his company for assisting in the illegal distribution of Office 2003 and 2007″

    Its either stolen source code or misuse of patented work. Invalid argument M$.

    As for the “screenshot” of uTorrent. I’m guessing this anti-p2p group downloaded the torrent and connected to the swarm in order to see the peers/seeders. So makes you wonder why they didn’t get accused of filesharing either. Once you connect to a torrent swarm, you are officialy downloading the content so to speak.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.