TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Court Upholds $675k Verdict in RIAA Piracy Case

Joel Tenenbaum must pay the RIAA $675,000 in statutory damages, according to a new court decision today. The ruling upholds the original jury trial verdict from 2009.

The decision comes after the Supreme Court declined to look at the case on Constitutional Grounds earlier this year, and the 1st Circuit Court of Appeal reinstated the original verdict a year ago. In its decision last year, the appeal court said that if a new judge assigned to the case could reduce the award again if it granted the record labels a new trial.

US District Court judge Rya Zobel ruled that the damages were proportionate given his attitude and claims he had infringed “for at least eight years, from 1999 to 2007.” He was also criticized heavily for not admitting straight away.

“In spite of the overwhelming evidence from which the jury could conclude that Tenenbaum’s activities were willful, the award of $22,500 per infringement not only was at the low end of the range – only 15% of the statutory maximum – for willful infringement, but was below the statutory maximum for non-willful infringement. Considering all of the aforementioned evidence, the jury’s damage award was not so excessive as to merit remittitur.”

The constitutional aspect of the appeal – that the damages awarded were excessive – also didn’t stand up to the 80yo Carter-administration-appointee. . Referring to the Theft Deterrence and Copyright Damages Improvement Act of 1999, she notes that these large sums are intended by Congress for this exact reason, and so dismissed that argument too.

“Given the deference afforded Congress’ statutory award determination and the public harms it was designed to address, the particular behavior of plaintiff in this case as explained above, and the fact that the award not only is within the range for wilful infringement but also below the limit for non-willful infringement, the award is neither “wholly disproportioned to the offense” nor “obviously unreasonable.” It does not offend due process.”

There has been no comment from the RIAA, Sony, or the Tenenbaum defense at this time.

This post is from the News Bits section of TorrentFreak where we present stories from around the web in a concise summary format. Full TorrentFreak articles can be found here. If you have a tip please let us know. News Bits have their very own RSS feed
  • Anon

    And not a single cent will go to the artists.

    • Guest

      yep, all the money will all go to the IFPI who will use it all to chase after more people.

      • Anon

        And ruin their lives giving them ungodly fines in the millions for sharing one song…

        …HOW IS THIS @#%@# LEGAL?

        • Guest

          Its the same as copyright trolls, legalised extortion.

        • Anon

          @Guest Then the laws suck and need to be changed. There’s no way this @#$@!! should be legal. 

        • Guest

          @f45e6380501bdd36f70e7165d0990290:disqus Yeah I agree the law needs to be changed but how is it going to happen when the MAFFIA pay the politicians etc.

        • Anomymous

          how does that ruin their live? if they dont own anything then they cant give anything well you will go to prison for due dept of fines.. for sometime but after that well its same shit no money no paying….  well i would personally move out of out usa if i had something like that…  to country where depts wont follow….

        • EYE for an EYE

          Fuck the artists getting a cent from the RIAA.
          Don’t really give a fuck.

          Ruining a persons life.
          The RIAA are the scum of the earth.
          They/ all who participate/d in ruining peoples lives, need to see vengeance.

        • Guest321

          To be fair though the article says the guy was infringing willfully for 8 years. I am sure he didn’t share just ONE song in 8 years.

        • Doh

          @Guest321  Their moronic idea that every single download is a lost sale is so fucking absurd. Their stupidity is fucking astounding..

          I would like to think it’s just greed and there is nobody that stupid because it’s a scary thought to think our government will bend over backwards to please these morons.

          I’ve seen three year old kids with more common sense than these idiots. I’m pretty sure I’m sleeping and this last 10 years has been a fucked up dream I’ve yet to awaken from.

    • Thegiftsean

       And who really gives a fuck the artist are making millions and millions of dollars the winning freaks I don’t fuckin care

      • another anon

        Sorry, Justin Bieber might be making millions, but I would say at least 80% of artists are actually breaking their backs starving to death. The distributors along with the RIAA (and etc.) get the money. They end up getting up to 99% percent of the winnings in some cases. The only reason the artists you hear about are the ones with millions, is, well, because you hear about them: 1% might be a million.

  • Picard

    By far the biggest offence commited here is that ridiculous fine for such a petty act.  The people responsible have lost complete touch with reality.  They should be ashamed of themselves.

    • Guest

      Yeah very ridiculous especially when Vickerman (surfthechannel) got sentenced to 4 years in prison for what linking but was actually found guilty to conspire to defraud ?!?!?!?

      • Anon

         It seems like it’s getting to the point where if you are accused of sharing a file, you might as well kill the plaintiff.  They can’t press charges if they are dead, and the punishment for murder will soon be less than the punishment for file sharing.

  • Ophelia Millais

    The headline should read $675K, not $650K.

    • BJonesTF

      oops! that was TOTALLY my FAULT.

      I was working from memory of some parts to get this story out to you as soon as possible, and my memory is clearly failing in my old age.

      Anyway, fixed now!

      • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

         I’m afraid to say I empathise fully.  I too have to double-check every-fecken-thing I post these days and it’s such a damned nuisance  :(

      • Ophelia Millais

        now if you can get the URL fixed, with a redirect as well, we’ll be in business :)

  • kwame

    Article VIII of the Bill of Rights says, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”
    These words are meant to constrain the Congress and the federal courts.
    Could Congress pass a law imposing a $675,000 fine on Joel Tenenbaum for non-commercial copyright infringement? Could Judge Zobel enforce such a law? No, not constitutionally.
    But let’s go way out on a limb and assume that the words quoted above apply only to criminal cases. Next, let’s structure copyright infringement as a civil matter instead of a criminal case. Normally in a civil case damages have to be proven to the court, but let’s finesse that problem by using the term “statutory damages”. Now we can impose as excessive a fine—oops, statutory damages—as we want.
    Voilà, we’ve succeeded in changing the Constitution by ordinary congressional action.

    • Ophelia Millais

      During oral arguments, the judges all seemed to be quite aware of the technical issues and how ridiculous the situation would be if the plaintiffs sued everyone who shared files (awards would quickly exceed the global GDP). However, the appeal really only hinged on whether statutory damages should be treated like punitive damages, a jury award of which can be more easily reduced by a judge on constitutional grounds. if I understand correctly, what the appeals court is saying is that as long as the jury’s award was in the statutory range, the district court judge has very little leeway for reducing it on constitutional grounds; only the Williams standard (referring to a precedent from an old Supreme Court case) for assessing the constitutionality of damages applies. Unlike the Gore standard which applies to explicitly punitive damages, rather than implicitly punitive statutory damages like these, the Williams standard essentially says to trust Congress and juries; statutory damages aren’t unconstitutional unless the disparity between the award and the cause of action are really beyond the pale. It’s not that there isn’t an eyebrow being raised over the disparity here, but the courts are obligated, under the Williams standard, to give the benefit of the doubt to the jury unless there’s no way a jury could’ve “reasonably” decided as it did. In this case, the defendant was so egregious in his ongoing misconduct, the appeals court says it’s not unreasonable for the jury to have taken that into consideration, and, combined with Congressional records showing that Congress did intend for the statutory range to have a deterrent effect, the award being on the high end has to be accepted and not reduced by the district court judge. If this award isn’t what Congress intended, it’s Congress’s problem.

      IMHO, Tenenbaum’s ongoing infringement is only relevant to the extent that he shared the files being sued for in this case; the jury really got an earful about how much more he shared than just what they had evidence for, and how much harm is allegedly done by file sharing in general, neither of which should matter when deciding what this defendant should pay for his actions in regard to the documented infringement of the specific set of songs named in the suit. But they didn’t ask me…

    • http://twitter.com/sheepodoom SheepODoom

       What he should have done was counter sued for 1 billion dollars citing out of print material. by proving that he can not get some music EXCEPT via bit torrent their case falls apart. Also counter sue on the basis of Fraud & extortion as NONE of those damages will go to ANY of the Musicians

  • downunder

    So what if he was jobless .. how would he pay such ridiculous fines

    they can charge people crazy amount of fines.. dont mean they ever get the cash

    go to jail for 4 years cos the tax payers $500K or more to keep him there

    and comes out to live of welfare and pay the fine off? like $10 a week LOL

    good luck with that..

    unless the person makes heaps of cash selling copyright stuff not just sharing it as a fan they are screwed to ever get the money

  • Mr. Shadow

     I’m sorry this has happened to you Joel.

    The verdict is unjust. I’m afraid if you want justice, don’t expect it from the corrupt U.S. courts. They are as capable of being swayed by money and corporatism as politicians.

    This makes me absolutely sick.

    Ideas:

    1. Move to another country. Trash your old credit cards and find a way to pay for your transport without your old credit cards (there are ways). This prevents them having the ability to track you. Choose a location with EXTREMELY private banking laws (ie Singapore, etc.). Before moving, make sure your assets are not tied to other family members so the creditors can’t bother them. Also, do not tell your family where you are going and be careful about how you communicate with them in future.
    2. Put your money in a bank at your new location.
    3. Work on citizenship in that area and lay low. Make sure they don’t report your citizenship back to your home country.
    4. After achieving citizenship, change your name.
    5. Transfer all funds into another bank account under your new name.
    6. Tell the REAL criminals to go F*** THEMSELVES.
    7. Live a good life.

    • Guest321

      I agree with this post. Sometimes its worth going to extremes to live the good life because we only live once. If he stays in the US, he will probably be in debt forever and then have to go to prison for a few years being unable to pay the debt. 

      Its never easy to leave everything and move to another country but freedom comes before everything. Throughout history people have given their lives for the sake of freedom, so a small sacrifice is nothing.

    • Mao Tse Tung

      Don’t go to Singapore, at least for first time, you can move there years later. Singapore is friend of USA and Japan, and it’s not good. First go to a South America country, from there you prepare the next destination to Asia.
      Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia are among good choices, they are buddhist and very friendly people. You can live as an English teacher in a village’s school.
      If you want safer but sacrificing some privacies, go to a moslem country like Indonesia or Sub Sahara countries like Tunis, Morocco. Most of them are moderate moslems, but you need to blend and behave, pretending to change religion to Islam will be the best as you’ll be their hero and get maximum protection.
      This suggestion is based on experiences, not a theory.

  • Vvip

    I agree with Mr Shadow. Sony will never be nice or moral.

  • Vvip

    Sony is immoral, blacklist yourself from their wares.

    • Anti Sony

       if anyone still uses sony products after the 2nd time they imbedded illegal rootkits in their code & were caught, then that person deserves what they got. sony has proved itself time and again that they are immoral & unscrupulous when it comes to dealing with their content.

  • Pingback: ?????????? ???-???? ???????? ????????? $675 ???. ?? 30 ????????? ?????? - ?????????? onliner.by

  • Blah

    Statuary damages aren’t intended to “punish” the defendant, they’re intended to give a rough estimate of lost profits when the exact amount can’t be calculated. Unless the company can prove that they’ve lost sales, they shouldn’t get jack.

  • Pingback: Court Upholds $675k Verdict in RIAA Piracy Case

  • Pingback: ??????? WWW | ?????????? ???????? $675 ???. ?? ?????????? ??????????????? ??????????? ??????

  • Rekrul

    You just know that at least half the people on the jury were guilty of downloading music themselves from file sharing networks.
     

  • Pingback: Torrent News » Movie Studio Wants to Bankrupt Pirate Bay Founder

  • girfuy

    $22500 per infringement??That really is kicking the arse out of it.Should be the price of a dvd or album,game whatever the infringement is not 22500 a time.

    • dspot

      In one way, I agree with you, but I also understand that an illegal act should be punished. The really big deal here is that you are not amendable for each meter you drive beyond the limitation. So if it’s 22,500$ per infringement, it’s ok, but for ALL 30 songs, and not PER song. The law is not consistent on that point.

  • Pingback: Are 31 Songs Really Worth $675,000? The Justice System Thinks So | WebProNews

  • Childsplay

    Can he file for bankruptcy and includ the 675K in charges as part of bankruptcy?

  • Pingback: 675 000 dollars pour 30 chansons sur Kazaa : sanction une nouvelle fois confirmée | Allomonsite.com

  • Pingback: Are 30 Songs Really Worth $675000? The Justice System Thinks So | 2unes Music News

  • Movie fan

    In this economy the companies initiating these actions need to be spanked hard to end this crap. The best way is to call for boycotts. Get a few musicians and actors on board and you’ll have plenty of publicity for the boycotts as well. 

  • abisaat

    O yes. Arrest me please.
    I steal all of their musics since before Internet existed, when cassettes (magnetic tape) are common media of songs I used a tape recorder to copy, until Internet’s torrent and megaupload era. I steal thousands of songs maybe for more than 30 years, until now.

    • ScrewEwe2

      I taped a song with a small reel to reel recorder via a hand held microphone (I believe it was “Last Train To Clarksville” by The Monkees) off the AM radio in 1967. Do you think I have anything to worry about? I was only twelve yrs. old and hadn’t figured out how to shoplift LP’s yet. I recorded over the song, so maybe I’m safe, but the fat kid next door listened to it with me first. Damn, what if he narcs me out? Maybe I can sneak across the border to Mexico and elude ICE. Mexico?, maybe not. They’ll think I know the Demonoid dude. I’m so scared. I promiss, I’ll never record a shitty song off the AM radio with a cheesy ass reel to reel and let a fat kid know about it. I’ll stick to robbing banks and holding up liquor stores instead of pirating music. You get in a hell of a lot less trouble doing that.

      (Just being ironic here. I don’t rob banks or hold up liquor stores. It does seem sometimes like the penalties for sharing music are a hell of a lot higher than for white collar crime or violent crimes.)

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.