TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Criminals Target Megaupload Users With Fake Settlement Demands

Criminals are attempting to extort Internet users by claiming there could be financial implications for those who used file-sharing site Megaupload for infringing activities. For the past several days a fake law firm claiming to act on behalf of entertainment companies such as Universal, Sony, EMI and Paramount has been claiming cash settlements from innocent victims.

Schemes which require alleged copyright infringers to pay cash settlements to make lawsuits disappear are nothing new.

Those describing these revenue-generating projects often do so using the word ‘scam’, but while the schemes are questionable, in many cases the companies carrying them out are genuine rightsholders supported by real lawfirms.

Over the past couple of days a pair of cast-iron scams have been targeting file-sharers, one mimicking the model used by so-called ‘pay-up-or-else’ lawfirms and another with a more technical approach.

The first targets users of the now-defunct cyberlocker service Megaupload. Playing on the fears of people who may have used the site for infringing purposes, the documents supporting the scam claim to be from legitimate-sounding German lawfirm “Dr. Kroner & Kollegen” of Munich.

As can be seen from the screenshot below, the fake lawfirm claims to be acting on behalf of rightsholders such as Universal, Sony, EMI, Warner and Dreamworks.

KronerMega

Supported by fake IP addresses and timestamps, the scam ‘lawfirm’ lays out its case. Since the user has downloaded unauthorized copyrighted material from Megaupload they are now liable for fines of 10,000 euros should the case not be dealt with effectively. But for a payment of just 147 euros the whole thing can be made to go away.

Other suspicious elements aside, no specific copyright works are named and the claim is missing the usual ‘cease and desist’ element common to these schemes. Furthermore, according to a OnlineKosten, any cash payments made would end up at an address in Slovakia.

Separately, GVU, an anti-piracy group responsible for the takedown of many file-sharing sites, has been targeted in a more sophisticated scam. According to the group, which was central to the huge operation that closed down Kino.to last year, a piece of malware is doing the rounds which tries to scam file-sharers out of cash settlements using GVU’s name.

GVUScam

As can be seen from the screenshot above, infected users find their browsers hijacked and redirected to a page which displays a warning, claiming to be from GVU, that the computer in question has been detected sharing copyright works.

In a clear indication that this is definitely a scam, settlement of just 50 euros is requested via PaySafeCard to make a potential claim go away.

“The sender of this message is not GVU and we clearly distance ourselves from such criminal activities,” the anti-piracy group said in a statement.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Anarket

    haha that sucks

  • MadAsASnake

    The sooner this sort of thing is stamped out the better. Don’t care whether it’s a real law firm or not, whether it’s backed by real content firms or not. This is only happening because the “pay up or else” schemes have had some success in gathering money.

    • Anon

      You got ONE PROBLEM here buddy to stamp this out means the internet needs policed…you see the catch 22 you got there surely? It is the very people trying to take our freedom who would police this stuff also. They can use it as a backdoor to stop us. It is rare and people should simply educate themselves and not be so daft as to send money to anyone without checking things out fully.

      • Anyone

        you can police the “real” lawfirms that do this
        once it is established that all those letters are just blackmail it will be much easier to be dealt with.

        but as long as there are still “official” blackmail letters allowed there will always be scammers riding their coattails.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ender-Wiggin/100000885624281 Ender Wiggin

          it’s easy, real legal documents still come via snail mail. if it’s not a subpeona, ignore it.

        • MadAsASnake

          The easiest thing to do would be to deny the IP / accountholder matching process. As IP has been discreditted this should be happening (getting closer in practice in UK). This simple step would starve the whole scam out.

      • MadAsASnake

        Pay up or else schemes have to be stamped out. They are money making extortion schemes and have nothing at all to do with policing the Internet.

      • Anonymous

        It means Outlaw the PAY UP OR ELSE extortion scheme of doing business. The internet doesn’t need to be policed. The law firms that participate in the pay up or else schemes and MAFIAA need to be spanked real hard. It’s PURE extortion. Pay us or we’ll screw you over real bad, whether you have downloaded or not. Throw in porn and you have a ringer. They know it’s easier to give in and pay, They say as much in their demands. It will cost you more to defend yourself (even if 100% innocent) than to pay our extortion. Get it????

        These schemes need to be outlawed altogether. Regardless of what organization is sending the demands. It’s WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

        BTW, Anon, pay me or else…… or else what? Pay and you’ll never have to know…..

      • Tsunku

        don’t call me buddy, pal!

  • Anonymous

    if governments had jumped on the arse holes that started these ‘pay up or else’ schemes, stopping them when they first came into being and realised that file sharing is a natural thing for the human race to do (and wont stop), and encouraged those that try to curb it to innovate, not prosecute, the problem wouldn’t exist, would it?

  • Anonymous

    We have seen before that valid copyright trolling is often followed up by scam artists looking for an easy buck the unlawful way. Another example would be following the death of ACS:Law a scam artist tried to scam people in Greece using the ACS:Law name and an address right next to where the real ACS:Law used to be based.

    Well I sure these scam artists will soon get the attention of the Police who will come knocking and arresting. Valid or scam it always makes me sad how the public are exploited.

    • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com S.J. Doe

      I totally agree, but the fact that you are using the word “valid” bothers me a bit :)

      • MadAsASnake

        Right. ACS Law was a real law Firm Media Cat was a real company. It was still a scam.

      • Un-defended

        Probably should have read “valid scam” or “regular scam”. As in done by real troll criminal lawyers or just troll criminals with a law license.

        • Un-defened

          oops meant “without a law license”

    • Anonymous

      Very hard to do across borders. But this BS has to come to an end. These scammers need to feel the pain of broken legs. LOL! Hey, at least I’m not getting emails from Nigerian Princes anymore. :)

  • Acce

    Its funny because when they say: you have pirated material on your computer, we all know it‘s true because we all do it, so naive people might think they have been targetted personally.

    • stopping by

      We do?

      • Anyone

        don’t try to tell me that you don’t

        • stopping by

          This is interesting, Anyone: Your choice of phrase shows that you honestly believe you have a point.

          You don’t.

        • Anonymous

          Maybe it(dropping he or she to avoid further gender debates) pirated all sorts of sh*t and results to denial.

        • Anonymous

          @stopping by
          Your statement just rendered your comment useless. Next time try something that doesn’t backfire.

        • Anyone

          the point is that you can shove your “holier than thou” attitude ;)

      • MadAsASnake

        If you have a computer then you will have files subject to copyright on it. Some of those will have histories that mean that in fact they will be infringing copyright and or patent is some way. This will be true even on a brand new clean system.

        • Guest

          Not if you are using Linux.

          Why people think Windows is the only OS?

        • MadAsASnake

          @Guest
          This will be true of Linux sytems too. While Linux may be open source, the histories of each file in the build determines copyright – not the GPL (same for the MS EULA).

        • Anyone

          you can have some copyrighted files in your browsercache, even when using Linux

      • An0nYm0uS_Pt

        Yes you do… If you have ever visited Google… or Youtube, your system has illegal cached information.. clearly able to be marked illegal downloads. Specially if the page or video has been removed from the site for copywrong issues…
        Personally I’ve seen your nick used on a number of posts recently and the only thing your doing here is trolling the hell out of people with your stupid remarks and comments…
        How about you turn off your computer and go play out in the middle of the street. You would be doing a favor to the human race.

    • Pzf

      I do not have pirated material on my computer. I just have lots of ones and zeros on my hard drives. The fact that they happen to be identical to the ones and zeros of some copyrighted stuff is just a weird coincidence.

      • Anonymous

        Can’t argue with that. Probability always has its way of making things happen.

  • http://twitter.com/Wasson_C Wasson_C

    “US Gov takes out legit service and turns users into financial victims”. Along with the drug war turning legit users into victims. And the Iraq war taking the price of fuel financially out of reach. I think it is now time to look at the US Government as a front for creating and supporting criminal activities.

    • Steve

      The US government nowadays IS a criminal enterprise that makes Satan look like a pussy.

      • Anonymous

        The book 1984 was never intended to be an instruction manual but here we are.

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    Oh, actually it took long enough for this. But then again these are no different from the MAFAA criminals so it’s only natural that ppl actually fall for it.

    • An0nYm0uS_Pt

      Fear is and always will be a big well paying business.

  • Krosis

    Even more cause to ignore these silly letters, fake or real. Hurray!

    • stopping by

      Actually not – you should report the fakes to the police and take the rest seriously. Unless you can afford the consequences, of course.

      • Anyone

        the “real” letters are just as harmless
        just put them into the junk bin and be done with those leeches.

        • stopping by

          You really don’t want to give that sort of advice to people you care about – especially if they happen to be Americans or Germans.

          You’re not hurting the right holders; you’re just hurting the thieves…

        • MadAsASnake

          Not quite. You should send one carefully worded denial. If it ends up in court (and these shysters have a habit of not serving properly) then a default judgement can be made. If you didn’t make a denial in the first place you end up liable, even though it is essentially extortion.

        • MadAsASnake

          Wow, I actually agreed with stopping by on something…

        • http://twitter.com/Wasson_C Wasson_C

          This is a good practice because they will have to pay to have it hand delivered to to you so the court knows it wasn’t lost during delivery. They are fishing for suckers to show up or pay up voluntarily if you just take a postal delivered letter as a required subpena.

      • MadAsASnake

        The ACS letters were reported to the Police, and even after having been described as “Legalised Extortion” in the House of Lords no action was taken. Why do you constantly support these false accusations? many people paid this one and many spent considerable somes on legal fees. Not one scrap of it was justified.

        • Danny

          ACS:Law got fucked over and the practice no longer occurs in the UK.
          No action taken eh?

        • MadAsASnake

          @Danny
          No criminal action – nothing by the Police. Crossley got a 2 year ban from practising – it’s not enough.

      • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com S.J. Doe

        By “consequences” you mean being sued individually by a “rights” holder? Like this: http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2012/03/01/prenda-law-makes-the-classified-number-of-actually-served-defendants-public/ ? If so, than yeah, consequences are really dire.

      • Anonymous

        You are a true terrorizer. ‘You’re just hurting the thieves…’

        Actually recommending a fellow human to submit to extortion makes all your statements concerning ethics empty.

  • stopping by

    Um, nobody thinks suing thieves is a ‘scam’…:)

    • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com S.J. Doe

      Why didn’t you mention rapists or robbers? It would be of the same level of relevance to the topic.

    • DutchGuest

      Obvious troll is still obvious.

      • stopping by

        What can I say, my masters don’t pay me enough.

        And you get what you pay for.

        • Danny

          To be honest I wouldn’t do a very good job with a cock up my arse for payment either.

        • stopping by

          Danny,
          You really do think I’m payed, dontcha?

          You guys…

        • Anyone

          there are 2 options: paid or ignorant

          we chose the kinder one

        • Trolling by

          Wat kan ik zeggen, mijn meesters niet genoeg betalen mij.

    • Anyone

      downloading is not stealing (I hate repeating this, but one day it will get into your thick skull)

      and even if it was the “evidence” of these letters is so vague that it will hit many people who never heard of MegaUpload as well.

    • MadAsASnake

      In the case of ACS, the “rights holder” had no right of action, the supposed copyright holder may not have had exclusive copyright (if any copyright at all), the IP evidence was highly flawed (ISP couldn’t match up to 50% of them) and lacked any chain of evidence, there was no indication that evidence of an upload or download was collected at all, the expert witness statement was from a fly-by-nighter (hi clem!) who’s unlikely to have seen the system, and once in court they tried to drop the claims. All the “evidence” was not available as it was in a lock-up. I’m unaware of any of these schemes being better set up than ACS. They should be stamped out.

    • Guest

      Surprise, surprise – the latest troll thinks that this is a good thing. Cue Anon, PelouzeTF, WillaLavie, Jack Murdock and neostyles coming to join in a cappella harmony.

      Really, why haven’t you left yet if you’re just stopping by? You’re not staying, are you?

      • stopping by

        Not sure what you mean.

        Here’s what the author of the article wrote:

        “Schemes which require alleged copyright infringers to pay cash settlements to make lawsuits disappear are nothing new.

        Those describing these revenue-generating projects often do so using the word ‘scam’”

        Now, that’s plain nonsense.

        Nobody in the real world would use the term ‘scam’ about legal and necessary anti-piracy initiatives.

        • Tom

          You aren’t supposed to point out propaganda.

        • MadAsASnake

          How are demands for large sums of money based on false allegations necessary or helpful in any anti-piracy initiative? Those least likely to be targeted are the pirates and these schemes are already banned from a number of European countries.

        • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com S.J. Doe

          Since de-facto “necessary anti-piracy initiatives” == “scam” , you statement is an oxymoron:

          “Nobody in the real world would use the term ‘scam’ about legal scam.”

        • Danny

          ‘Stopping by’ this is not nonsense.

          Here is a dumbed down example for you. I recieve a pay up or else letter in my mail box I have 2 options I either pay $10000+ in legal expenses to defend myself or I can pay $200 to make it go away. Sounds quite like a scam to me…..

        • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com S.J. Doe

          Merriam-Webster definition of scam:

          “: a fraudulent or deceptive act or operation”

          Which part (“fraudulent” or “deceptive”) is not applicable to “legal and necessary anti-piracy initiatives” (aka “speculative invoicing” or “copyright trolling”)?

        • stopping by

          S.J. Doe,
          Both.

        • stopping by

          MadAsASnake,
          False allegations are neither legal nor necessary.

          People who make them should fry in hell and/or be counter-sued.

        • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com S.J. Doe

          > Both.

          Prove it.

        • puddypuddy

          For some reason you believe these scams are morally sound. You forget to realize that matching an ip address with a person isn’t 100% accurate. So you send these letters and some innocents are hit with the shrapnel of your greed. It is too expensive to fight this in court, so they pay up the settlement even though they did nothing. These scams are disrupting innocent families while you defend their actions?

          IP addresses can be spoofed. People use other’s wifi. Hell, an antipiracy group got caught downloading recently, and you know what they said? “Someone must be spoofing our IP address.” I thought that wasn’t an excuse?

        • Jmorse43508

          In this case, it’s both a scam and extortion.

        • Tom

          Merriam-Webster definition of dog:

          “: a highly variable domestic mammal (Canis familiaris) closely related to the gray wolf”

          Which part (“aggressive” or “dangerous”) is not applicable to “chihuahua” (aka “Evil ass biting dog” or “Murdering rabid killer”)?”

          …..”Both.”

          “Prove it.”

        • Tom

          Oops, screwed that up a bit but it still demonstrates the point.

        • Anonymous

          Tell me something. Why would somebody with opinions like yours spend so much time on this site? You’re probably American given your close relationship with ‘sueing’ people.

          If I would spend an hour every day browsing ‘The Hill’ I would probably snap.

        • MadAsASnake

          @stopping by
          how many letters in these schemes, based in IP data, do you think are addressed to the infringer?

        • Tom

          @MadAsASnake
          Many people are wrongly put away in prison or asked to pay the penalty for a crime that they didn’t commit. It is very unfortunate but does this mean that we should do away with laws/penalties associated with crime or that these penalties are wrong?

        • Anyone

          they can sue every person they want
          but they don’t, since filing the suit is too expensive to them, so they rather use this extortion scheme

          and usually when the police arrest/accuse someone they have at least some proof, an IP adress is not proof.

        • MadAsASnake

          @Tom
          The state is expected to take all possible care to avoid that. Which does not answer the question. In these schemes, the peretrators clearly could not care less whether the accused did it or not. Lets say 10% shall we. Is that acceptable?

        • Tom

          @MadAsASnake
          If they are trying to pin something on someone that they believe didn’t commit an offence then that is obviously incorrect and illegal. Same with bent cops. So no it’s not acceptable.

          But unless you have some evidence that this is occurring (not saying that it doesn’t mind you) you are just speculating.

          I mean I could say that 10% are probably dodging their taxes or are child molesters meaning that those 10% are actually criminals themselves. But what would this actually mean without evidence?

        • MadAsASnake

          @Tom
          With the shameful exception of Germany, the burden of proof here is on the accuser. Now on what possible basis can you assume that the account holder must be the infringer? If you cannot do that (and with only an IP you cannot possibly know who – if anyone – was at the keyboard), it’s a false accusation. Very simple, really. BTW, I cannot proof the negative. As Germany shows, not even a Granny without a computer can do that.

        • Guest

          >MadAsASnake,
          False allegations are neither legal nor necessary.

          People who make them should fry in hell and/or be counter-sued.

          Good. So we’re at least on the agreement that if the RIAA/MPAA sues the wrong person, they should have hell to pay.

        • MadAsASnake

          @Guest
          HADOPI, DEA etc all use precisely the same deeply flawed assumption. Would you agree that the perpetrators of those schemes should “… who make them should fry in hell and/or be counter-sued.”

        • Guest

          >HADOPI, DEA etc all use precisely the same deeply flawed assumption. Would you agree that the perpetrators of those schemes should “… who make them should fry in hell and/or be counter-sued.”

          Definitely. I’m just amazed that stopping by has the balls to agree that false positives should never, ever be tolerated.

    • Zig

      Hang on, I think I’ve missed where thieves suddenly became involved on the defence side of these cases. I thought the thieves were the scammers, as does every other right-thinking individual in the world.

      And to clarify, by ‘scammers’ I mean those discussed in the article above and those dodgy law firms trying to extort money from members of the public based on nothing but an unverifiable IP address logged against a file, the contents of which are also never proven to be infringing copyright.

      • MadAsASnake

        stopping by’s logic is on a Mobius loop…

        • Zig

          A twist in the fabric of space where time becomes a loop? where time becomes a loop? where time becomes a loop? where time becomes a loop? etc etc etc…

  • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com S.J. Doe

    > “The sender of this message is not GVU and we clearly distance ourselves from such criminal activities,” the anti-piracy group said in a statement.

    Read: “we are busy with other criminal activities”

  • Kr0nZ

    I would actually prefer to give my money to these criminals rather than the criminals in Hollywood.

    • MadAsASnake

      I’d rather use my money to buy something I want than give it to any of these criminals

      • Anonymous

        I’d donate my money to a genuine nonprofit organization and let TPB indulge me

  • Pingback: Criminals Target Megaupload Users With Fake Settlement Demands

  • Anonymous

    lol, now why am I not the least bit surprised lol.
    real-world-anon.tk

    • Hoho

      Hi VPN seller. Where do you live? I have a gift for you!

  • Pingback: Criminals Target Megaupload Users With Fake Settlement Demands | Best Seedbox

  • tonyj

    Couple of questions come to mind

    1. How did they get a list of MegaUpload customers?

    2. How were they able to match IP addresses to customers?

    Usually, matching the IP to a real address is only within the domain of the ISP. Are ISPs supporting these scams?

    • MadAsASnake

      I’d guess it’s all completely random

      • Anyone

        just like other phishing attempts it is completely random
        they send out millions of those, if even a fraction of the recipients pay up it is a success.

    • Anonymous

      Try the sites who were claiming to be the new MegUpload when they wanted the MU users to sign up.

  • Anonymous

    I’d wish the MAFIAA would actually try this… something as malicious as Sony BMG’s rootkit, but more… damaging.

    • MadAsASnake

      The rootkit was illegal yeah, so Sony is a criminal organisation yeah, so Sony was a conspiracy yeah, and all money transactions were laundering yeah, so why didn’t th DOJ sent in the anti-terrorist cops and confiscate the lot?

  • Anonymous

    How about we all send MAFIAA a Pay Up Or Else demand letter. Change or we pirate the shit out of you forever and a day. WE DEMAND CHANGE, or else…. We continue to pirate.

  • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

    Time for the FBI to have a BIG public information campaign to warn everyone to disregard these things.

  • Un-defended

    There is very little difference between the “real copyright scams” and the “fake copyright scams” they are both not legit and are being run by criminals disguised as attorneys.

  • John

    I can see how a ot of innocent users might fall for it, these scams and our old friends the legal scams aren’t that different after all.
    And I don’t like to see people being scammed regardles of who and how it happens but at least this shows how wrong the settlement deals are, their modus operandi walked so close to the thin grey line already that for most people scam and settlements are the same and they’ll end up paying.

    The reality is that the legal quasi blackmail settlements constitute a kind of harmfull behaviour for society and lack enough regulation to protect the people of the world from over paying, paying in situations where there is no legal basis or even in this case allows criminals to easily act as right holders all because regulation is not enough, they are too easy too do and they are not taken seriously enough

    • MadAsASnake

      I don’t see a lot of difference – except in the degree to which the claims are unjustified.

  • Guest

    You know, I wouldn’t put it past the lables themselves to put this up. They’re pretty much criminals already.

    • Anyone

      oh they do the exact same thing.
      they are just using other lawfirms and asking for even more money.

  • Gabor

    All I wish is that one of these (real) extortion lawyers in Germany target someone who turns out to be an aggressive cop not willing to pay. Germany is an Eldorado for lawyers, but also for cops that like to beat up people for fun, even very severe cases resulting in the death of the victim often end with little or no consequences. (No wonder, such cases are always investigated by the police itself, not a higher authority like in most other countries)
    Or a “nice” citizen like Serkan A., a Turkish guy who kicked an old man in the head almost killing him for being told not to smoke in the subway would also do the job rather nicely.
    Others would quickly learn that threatening unknown people is like playing russian roulette!

  • Pingback: Warning: Scammers Are Targeting MegaUpload Users With Fake Legal Threats | Gizmodo Australia

  • whatsina

    Meh. I seriously doubt someone is doing this as a revenue-generating scheme. Far more likely, it’s a proof of concept for how ‘extortiony’ the actual campaigns appear. Show me more than one screenshot, and I’ll believe you. For now, I’m pretty sure this is just bad journalism. Oh your buddy took this screenshot? And adamantly supports your position on copyright? And owns photoshop? This is petty, swiftboater-style campaigning through and through. I never actually get the chance to say this, it’s exciting…….’shill!’.

    • Gabor

      In Germany such scams are nothing new. A week ago I personally removed a trojan from a friend’s computer that said the computer is blocked by the Bundespolizei (Federal Police) because of illegal things like child porn and spam related to terrorism, and 100€ must be paid to unblock it. I already encountered this half a year ago on another machine, it was an older version, easier to remove.
      Here’s an article about it, complete with screenshot:
      http://www.pc-blog-berlin.de/fieser-virus-der-dem-anwender-erzahlt-das-bundeskriminalamt-sei-auf-seinem-rechner/

    • Gabor

      And please open up your eyes. You still think there are only nice people and dirty pirates, and without the latter everything would be fine.
      Read on how the real extortion scheme works in Germany! Not only pirates, but bloggers and eBay sellers suffer from it too.

  • Guest

    This is actually great news! Now we just need these scammers to send the letters with the names of actual law firms that do this and once it is impossible to tell whether or not the letters are coming from a legitimate source they will have to cease!

    • MadAsASnake

      In the UK, many ACS / GCB / Goldeneye victms assumed precisely that because there was no legitimacy in the claim and they were worded in such strong terms. Also £500 is not a trivial and most people think twice before shelling it out.

  • Pingback: Scammers targeting former Megaupload users with fake legal claims

  • Frightening

    “The sender of this message is not GVU and we clearly distance ourselves from such criminal activities,” the anti-piracy group said in a statement.”

    It does not matter. They are both criminals and they both deserve to die.

    Let’s shoot them.

  • FTFY

    Odd choice of language…

    Criminals Target Megaupload Users With Fake Settlement Demands

    They’re only criminal if they’ve been charged with a crime.

    Scammers Target Megaupload Users With Fake Settlement Demands

  • Pingback: Scammers Mimic Copyright Troll Shakedowns In Targeting Megaupload Users – - TechNewsX - Technology News AggregatorTechNewsX – Technology News Aggregator

  • Pingback: Scammers Mimic Copyright Troll Shakedowns In Targeting Megaupload Users | Geek News and Musings

  • Pingback: Criminals Target Megaupload Users With Fake Settlement Demands | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

  • Pingback: Criminals Target Megaupload Users With Fake Settlement Demands | Emmashare

  • http://www.webstatsart.com/ Webstats Art

    yeh. watch out for the twitter page rank scam http://www.webstatsart.com/twitter

  • Pingback: Del timo de la estampita al de Megaupload - La Isla Buscada

  • Pingback: GVU: Neue Fake-Abmahnungen im Netz unterwegs - GIZMODO DE - Das Gadget-Weblog

  • Pingback: Deux arnaques ciblent les anciens utilisateurs de Megaupload | Allomonsite.com

  • Pingback: Megaupload, scontro sui file degli utenti | infropy - information entropy

  • Pingback: DT Morning News Roundup – March 22, 2012

  • http://jamesmsingleton.com/ jimsing59

    Is it copyright infringement if what you are downloading has no value, as in the case of most music and movie? It may be but, no harm-no foul. All art should be in the public domain anyway. If artist want money, they should work for it doing concerts and live performances. The days are gone when an artist can make a one-hit wonder and live off of it the rest of their lives.
    I think the RIAA owes their customers who made them such powerful lobbyist. Hopefully all these organizations will disappear and in the mean-time we need to educate users on how to download safely.

  • Asdf

    Congratulations, United States of Ass, you made extortion legal. I hope you’re proud.

  • Pingback: Scammers targeting former Megaupload users with fake legal claims | Pc Tech News | Laptop News - Apple News - Electronic Parts News - Android News

  • BobM

    “cash settlement” is clearly a red flag in my book, avoiding records and documentations like court order payments, cashiers checks, money orders etc. I would have laughed and disposed of it. Who ever fell for this, they are dumbasses.

  • Anonymous

    ṁy beśt fŔienď’ś Ṁoṁ Ṁakeś $76/ĥouŔ on tĥe laptop. Śĥe ĥaś been out of WoŔk foŔ 7 Ṁontĥś but laśt Ṁontĥ ĥeŔ pay Waś $7226 juśt WoŔking on tĥe laptop foŔ a feW ĥourś. Go to tĥiś Web Śite anď reaď Ṁore…LazyCash1.com

  • Pingback: Del timo de la estampita al de Megaupload | TechyMag

  • Pingback: GNC-2012-03-22 #752 The Crud Strikes! - Geek News Central

  • Pingback: Scammers extorsionan a usuarios de Megaupload con demandas falsas | OpenSecurity

  • Pingback: YARIAN.COM - Technology and Support Site – (888) 265-9330 » YARIAN.COM

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001367140983 Gopal Das

    Fake Mega upload settlement scams or any other kinds, I think everybody should check Scam Detector, an app that Apple released recently. They have hundreds and hundreds of scams exposed, in several industries. For those interested, the app has an online presence as well: http://www.scam-detector.com

  • Pingback: Truffa via email per chi scaricava da Megaupload » FratelloGeek.com

  • Pingback: Antiguos usuarios de Megaupload víctimas de estafas por una firma de abogados falsos

  • Pingback: IP Law Update – 3/24/2012 | TRIZZAT

  • Pingback: IP Law Update – 3/24/2012 |

  • Pingback: Yao Integrated Information blog, help people search for the answer / Lastest Settlement Payments News

  • Pingback: In the Courts: Scareware, Facebook Trilogy and Double-Whammy and RIP Righthaven « ILC Cyber Report

  • Pingback: Online scam targets former MegaUpload users | Systems Technology Consultants Ltd – SYTECH

  • Pingback: DT Morning News Roundup – March 22, 2012 | Pc Tech News | Laptop News - Apple News - Electronic Parts News - Android News

  • Pingback: Noticias falsas de denuncias contra Megaupload: nueva estafa » Hijo y Redes

  • Pingback: Megaupload: MPAA wants data kept for lawsuits, scammers target users

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.