TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative

After seriously considering sending out “3 strikes” warning letters to file-sharers, today Denmark will officially announce the abandoning of the idea. Instead, the government and rightsholders will focus on the ‘Pirate Package’ initiative which will boost the development of legal services. In addition to many positive elements, the initiative also includes a mechanism to smooth the way towards easier website blocking.

After years of deliberations, today Denmark’s government will officially announce its new strategy for dealing with the issue of unauthorized file-sharing online.

Although pushed for heavily by rightsholders, the so-called “letter model” in which errant internet subscribers are sent a series of warnings informing them that their habits are illegal, is now officially off the table.

According to a Ministry of Culture document seen by TorrentFreak, the government will today announce its “Pirate Package”, an anti-piracy initiative that moves the emphasis away from punishing end users and towards the development and creation of better legal offerings. It consists of a number of components.

The first is the ‘Innovation Forum’ which will provide a platform for “dialog and innovation” for those looking to create and develop digital business models in various creative fields.

“The ambition is that the innovation forum will help to create a foundation for future collaboration across industries and backgrounds with the common goal to ensure that consumers have equal and easy access to as much creative content as possible,” the government writes.

The common theme raised in a number of the initiative’s components is the education of consumers. The Ministry of Culture says it will team up with the telecoms industry, rightsholders and the Consumer Council to launch a joint awareness project later this year to inform consumers which services are legal and which are not.

Additionally, the Ministry believes that one of the problems with the consumption of infringing music and movies is that the public does not understand its “significance and consequences.” It appears that rightsholders will step in to educate the masses on this issue.

“Rightsholders have stated that they will take the initiative to create an information task force that will pro-actively target and communicate with Internet users on relevant sites and forums,” the Ministry writes.

The rightsholders will reportedly seek to change Internet users’ attitudes by various methods, including contacting and initiating dialog with individuals on file-sharing sites “who upload and use illegal material.”

Another effort in the education of consumers will relate to securing existing open WiFi networks and having manufacturers build automatic technical solutions into hardware of the future.

On the ISPs end, outgoing customer bills will include notices warning users to secure their connections and stressing the importance of choosing legal media consumption offers over pirate networks.

The Ministry document also notes that there will be increased effort to remove infringing material from the Internet but perhaps a more controversial element of the Pirate Package relates to the ISP-level blocking of websites such as The Pirate Bay. The initiative hopes to pave the way for a smoother blocking process.

According to the Ministry, Denmark’s ISPs and rightsholders have reached an agreement on censoring sites which will be formalized into a written Code of Conduct.

In practice what this means is that if rightsholders want a site blocked they will only have to take legal action against a single ISP. Once a court decides the outcome (to block or not to block) that ISP agrees to be bound by “the final decision of the court.” Whether this means they agree not to launch an appeal as many ISPs have done in the past remains unclear.

“This is an automated process where the rights holders need only contact one organization / one telephone company, which will then make sure to communicate this decision to the other telcos,” the Ministry writes.

While rightsholders will be pleased at the formalization of the site-blocking procedures, they will be universally unhappy at the lack of any kind of end-user punishment, such as the provisions currently available in France or those forthcoming in watered-down form in the US.

However, opponents of 3 strikes-style regimes are cautiously happy with the outcome.

“We are all very happy that the letter model has been pronounced dead by the Ministry of Culture. It is a huge victory for the internet and for the users,” says Troels Møller, co-founder of Internet-political think tank and digital rights group Bitbureauet.

“The anti-piracy outfits and copyright organizations didn’t get their way this time. I think it’s a brave decision by the politicians,” Møller told TorrentFreak.

“It is a good idea to focus on operating legal services in ways that ensure users actually want to use them, and to facilitate forums to work out new business models.”

Early indications are that rightsholders still want more, with suggestions that they will now lobby for the police to become more active in pursuing uploaders of copyright material.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Pingback: Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative

  • Anyone

    finally some common sense

    • http://lazycash1.com/ Anonymous

      my roomate‘s sister makes $82/hour on the laptop. She has been out of work for six months but last month her check was $19771 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this site

      ?????? (Click On My Name For Link)

    • Violated0

      I can only wish the UK follows this example with added promotion of lawful services like NetFlix and LoveFilm. Not that they need extra promotion but they have not been around very long meaning they need consideration in the wider plan on infringement.

      Instead our Government is due to waste £5.8 million of taxpayer funds on the DEA including a 3-strikes letter writing campaign. It is doomed to fail but they may have to discover that the hard way.

      • Ikjloij

        They won’t, because that would hurt their profits and whats to stop them from stopping exclusive TV Shows like Game of Thrones from being shown.

        Honestly, if they were fair to begin with then there wouldn’t be a piracy problem.

        • http://zapit.nu/2Am Ruby D. Parks

          the people distributing their products all over the web for free deserve to be compensated! http://DemoforFrank.blogspot.com

    • Decimus

      Ending the end-user lawsuits is a good thing, but forcing ISP’s to block websites is rather ridiculous.  This is about as ridiculous as the other measures that are being taken.

      No matter what actions are being taken, there will remain easy ways to pirate materials.  And they’ll continue to be pirated until it’s not considered piracy.

  • http://twitter.com/CheapassFiction AeliusBlythe

    Okay…. ok, not so much a step forward, but perhaps a half step back from the road of total clusterfuckdom of 3 (etc) strike systems.

    So question #1, on this:  ”…..one of the problems with the consumption of infringing music and movies is that the public does not understand its “significance and consequences.” It appears that rightsholders will step in to educate the masses on this issue…….”

    Since the rightholders, courts, and lawmakers often betray their complete lack of education on the “consequences” who gets to decide HOW the masses are educated? (That’s not a sarcastic question, I’m honestly curious – how will the… “curriculum” be determined)

    And this: ” if rightsholders want a site blocked they will only have to take legal action against a single ISP. Once a court decides the outcome (to block or not to block) that ISP agrees to be bound by “the final decision of the court.”Ok, still taking a step towards said clusterfuckdom.  But can the foolish optimist ask if this is a two way street?  If one ISP **defeats** rightsholders in court, does the rightholder agree to be bound by the decision and not pursue other ISPs?(lol)

    • Anonymous

       dont be ridiculous. that’s when the constant appeals process starts!!

    • Strawbear

      Will the education be like that in South Park where the offenders are shown how pop stars can now only afford really good things rather than really great things?

    • thedude321

      Good point about the curriculum. It looks like a mass indoctrination attempt.

    • Lethn

       The problem is, these ‘rightsholders’ are declaring that they have lost sales from something that doesn’t physically exist in reality, has no value in reality and have no actual proof that they would have gained a sale if filesharing didn’t exist in the first place.

      If these were physical products they were copying and profitng from like real counterfeiters then they would have some say in the matter, however as it stands there is no cost whatsoever to them. In fact it could be argued that that the people distributing their products all over the web for free deserve to be compensated!

      • Gggg

        Imagine how many lawsuits their would be if item duplicators, like those from sci-fi shows, existed.

        • Anyone

          give it a few decades and it will be a reality
          cheap 3D printers already exist, but they are still limited by what materials they can create (right now just plastic or metal)

          TPB already has a category for blueprints for those printers ;)

          “soon” you CAN download a car.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=551987400 Dae’Ros Dai’Meyez

    my take on this is consistent: get the ISPs and google and only tech friendly companies to lobby for just abolishing the damn  intellectual property laws entirely. 

    • Strawbear

      So many problems with that theory it’s not worth going thru them all. Middle ground is needed.

      • blue_bomber

         I don’t see “so many problems” with the abolition, or extreme curtailment, of copyright and patent laws. Ask any programmer what he thinks, e.g., about software patents. Statistics say that the programmer will want them abolished completely. Some things just ought not to be monopolized.

        Copyright was very controversial and very hesitantly written into the US Constitution, and with a sole purpose to benefit the public. We’ve gotten far away from that kind of attitude towards copyright.

        I also disagree with the attitude that “Middle ground is needed.” The public has lost much of its ground in the copyright wars already, let’s not compromise more.

        • http://culturalliberty.org/blog Crosbie Fitch

          Well, actually, copyright was not written into the US Constitution. This is just another part of accepted indoctrination. See http://culturalliberty.org/blog/index.php?id=276

    • FreeInternet777

      I agree somewhat….we are making all these adjustments, laws etc within and to a fundamentally flawed law – copyright.  Copyright its self has to be reformed/abolished/re-born.  It’s a BS law that no-one has really worried about until recently.  (I remember musicians complaining about the way the recording studios own their stuff – in the 80′s)

  • GT

    “will only have to take legal action against a single ISP”

    This is kind of bad in a sense, that rightsholders may want to find an ISP which cooperates with them closely and hardly defends the user’s rights, so that it’s easy to get stuff blocked by this ISP. If blocking is generalized from this one ISP to all others, this will definitely lead to controversy.

    • Guess

       the interesting side of this is whats to stop them from just setting up their own “business” isp with no subscribers? as for them finding a “friendly isp which cooperates with them closely and hardly defends the users rights” How long would said ISP last when it got out and their customers started leaving in droves to other ISPs? :)

  • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

    Again, missing the reality that most ‘pirated content’ is actually legal content because the people in question have already paid for it in some manner, i.e. through cable/satellite TV, by buying a DVD, etc.

    These companies need to STOP artificially limiting how people can use their legally bought content with DRM and other things.

    • Guest

       Can you back up that first claim with evidence? I don’t think I’ve ever seen you back up this claim, and I’d like to examine your sources.

      • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

        Why should he have to back up this claim as if it were part of a Post Doc Review……I mean…How much back up do you need in support of Common Sense….

        If I paid to see XYZQ Movie as part of my Cable Package; and, chose later to continue it on my I Pad, but the Copyright Holder were able to extract a second payment….It would be Charging me Twice.  If subsequently, I finished seeing XYZQ by Streaming it, but the Copyright Holder could extract yet one more payment, it would be charging me three times for the same movie. 

        Taken to its “charge as many multiple times as possible” extreme, the Copyright Holder would be charging us yet later and yet again on the basis of each additional person who was in our living room while XYZQ was playing……or, even more profitably, by the Blink. 

        At what point do people understand that there’s a problem with any law that allows these excesses…..and that what needs to be done is NOT to educate consumers to tolerate the abuses…..but, to change or abolish the Copyright Laws that make those abuses possible?

        • Guest

           A. Common sense is very often wrong. That’s why we have the scientific method, to prove what common sense says

          B. Common sense also isn’t common to everyone. For example, My common sense says that what Kidwell claims is not true. I pirate so that I won’t ever have to pay for it. I don’t usually need to redownload things I’ve bought; I, along with many others, own no tablet and only need one computer to watch movies. In addition, I generally only pirate new things that I haven’t ever seen or played before. I can honestly say that I have not paid for most of the things I pirate (note; I may pay for them after I pirate, but I never pay before I pirate. That would be silly). Therefore, I call bullshit on his “common sense”, and ask for data. He’s making a testable, definitive claim. That is the very thing that science was designed to work for, so to say he has no burden to have scientific support for his belief is ridiculous.

          You present a real situation, but to suggest that this type of situation is the majority without data to back up your claim means nothing and is invalid. It’s the same as a copyright supporter saying that he thinks pirates almost never pay for anything. Both are beliefs, not knowledge, formed from personal biases instead of actually thinking and approaching the problem from a scientific or knowledgeable perspective.

          And finally, your conclusion about what needs to be about copyright law is correct, but that doesn’t make his belief valid. They are completely separate.

        • Rodrigo

           Seconded. If chris says that most people do that, he’s gotta prove it. His common sense is probably just bull. I pirate for free stuff, you pirate for free stuff, we all pirate for FREE FREAKING STUFF… well, most of us do. I don’t buy for a second that most piracy is in a situation where the pirate has paid for the thing before. If it’s so obvious that that’s true, then let Chris here grow some stones and show the proof. If he can’t, then GTFO.

  • Master

    Denmark cares.

    • Andrew me

       ” It appears that rightsholders will step in to educate the masses on this issue.”

      This is the problem, the rightsholders should be listening to the masses so that they can be educated, but it is turned around for some reason.

      This is why the rightsholders will fail, they  refuse to learn and refuse to listen to everyone demanding they change there business to keep up with changes in technology.

      • http://twitter.com/joshtarle Josh Tarle

        Lesson 1: All your $ is belong to us!

  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archive » Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative

  • Anonymous

    everyone knows the answers but no one with the say so wants to listen and actually implement the needed procedures simply because the entertainment industries are more interested in suing than adapting.

    give customers what they ask for, released everywhere at the same time, drm free, at good download speeds, in various formats and at sensible prices. just about all problems solved!

  • Simon Vu

    Here in Denmark it’s socially and (almost) lawfully accepted to pirate music and videos for private consumption, even if rightsholders try to “educate” us they will probably only reach the small minority that already hates piracy.

    • Bloaxor

       I can pretty much confirm that piracy is rather “mainstream”, so to say over here.

      • Anon

        Indeed it is.

    • Fuck You

       exactly, because danish citizens doesn’t want to wait 3 years for the TV stations to buy up old seasons of TV series cheaply…

      Same thing with movies, but in this case the fault lies the movie studios who still insist on releasing movies in the US before everywhere else to make US citizens feel all special. Rationalizing downloading it from the web takes little effort, since we are getting treated as second class customers and this is our way of saying Fuck You!

      We are getting Netflix here soon though, but it will be severly limited in terms of content compared to the US version and likely much more expensive. So people won’t buy it and the industry can say “See? we tried it your way and people still pirate, now give us unlimited tools to hunt these criminals!”

      • theonlyone

         Dont get too excited about Netflix. Its content is mediocre, however it is reasonably priced IMO. Its just stupid for rights holders to not have licensed their content to be viewed overseas. They know the masses are hungry and yet they whine when so many pirate content.

        • http://twitter.com/joshtarle Josh Tarle

          If rights holders offered a magnet link for a guaranteed high quality virus free download for $1 through paypal they would make millions from people who are willing to pay for their product but can’t due to regional restrictions. I’m beginning to think the over-paid CEOs of these media conglomerates just care more about power and control than actually making money. 

  • Alyssa Blindy

    I agree with only the promotion of legal sites and maybe some education. Although, if the rights holders wish to do this, I also think they should adapt to the consumers. It needs to be a compromise of sorts between the rightslolders and the rest of society.

  • Anonymous

    as usual, the only side taken into consideration is that of the entertainment industries. the ordinary citizen who is prepared to pay sensible money if given the chance to buy what is wanted, when it’s wanted, dips out yet again. why is it so hard to admit to what the solutions are, give them to the people and so end this constant battle? no single industry, government or person should have the right to decide what can be done by who and where over the internet and no one should have the right to decide that because something is wrong for them, it is wrong for everyone. if that happens, complete censorship is just a single extra step away. i wonder what the EU opinion is on this, not that it means much seeing as how no member country has to follow ‘the party line’!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

       They’ve backed themselves into a corner: I don’t believe the pirate line anymore that good legal alternatives will drastically reduce piracy.  They’ve done too little too late, the illegal services are so far ahead and so good that there is nothing they can do anymore.

  • Pingback: Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative | The Illuminati

  • foff

    Actually I am thinking we ought to encourage website blocking because it doesn’t stop shit but seems to make the Maafia happy.  So let the fucking stupid Mafiaa do their worthless blocking and we sill still get our stuff like always.

  • Pingback: Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative | Best Seedbox

  • Herbert

    if all member countries of the EU had to behave in the same way instead of being able to chose what they want and not want to do, this crap wouldn’t happen. how can you be in a club but have your own individual set of rules which even then you can chose whether to follow or not? absolutely ridiculous! file sharing, website blocking and censorship are either legal or not and must be the same everywhere in the EU, taking into account the strong stance on individuals privacy and freedom etc.

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    Did I read right? They finally starting to pick a right road to less piracy by offering better legal alternatives? 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

       But unfortunately it’s too late, as the illegal alternatives are getting better, and already far surpass the legal ones… this from someone who has little further use for Netflix.  Netflix is an inferior service for which you pay… it’s inferior because it’s bound up trying to adhere to copyright, so it doesn’t have the goods and it also doesn’t have the service especially on relatively slow connections.  In other words, they HAD a chance and they blew it, and it’s too late now: copyright COULD have been saved, but they didn’t.

  • Rekrul

    I guess from now on, when a child yanks a toy away from another child and yells “MINE!”, parents should reward them. After all, sharing toys robs the toy company of a sale they would have otherwise made to the other child’s parents. Sharing is stealing!
     

    • ThatSaid

      “sharing toys robs the toy company of a sale they would have otherwise made”

      Now please Rekrul = Lurker, that´s only speculation, you can´t possibly know if the parents would go and buy that specific toy for their kid, how can that be stealing ?

      If you are being forced to buy a new DVD copy, of a movie you already own on VHS. (Speculation – what if you just don´t have that VHS-player anymore) ? Are you going to buy another copy of the same movie, or are you going to look for it elsewhere ?)

      Getting “ACCESS” to channels where you can get a movie or other media you have purchased already, how can that be stealing ?

      Charging a FULL price for something you can prove that you own already, is STEALING, you should only pay for the new media, not the actual content !
      As long as consumers are being treated with disrespect, piracy will exist.

      • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

        “only speculation, you can´t possibly know if the parents would go and buy that specific toy for their kid, how can that be stealing ?
        Never noticed probably, but it’s kinda same for digital downloads. 1 download = 1 lost sale is lamest thing humanity thought of but yet… 

  • idontbuyebooks

    it is wrong to conceive the file-sharing questions in terms of *LEGAL* *NOT LEGAL*. Since SHARING a file (also if *copyrighted* cannot be defined as a THIEF), the owner of commercial rights has no dmages from filesharing, but only publicity and attraction of potential new buyers

    so, why they attack the file sharing? It is a matter of  MONOPOLY

    attacking the filesharing (first the *supposed illegal* and then also the *LEGAL FILESHARING BETWEEN USERS*), makes possible to launch terroristic messages towards uploaders that must no acting as *competitors* (yes, also with self-produced or copyright-free material) of commercial companies

    companies want monopolize the internet reproducing the monopoly they have in real life, and leave the right to share files (remember: also copyright-free or self-produced music, video, books and so on…), since this can be an element of distraction for internet surfers that are considered by companies only as *buyers*

    the second important element that makes *RIDICULOUS* the juxtaposition  between *LEGAL AND NOT LEGAL* is that there are movies, music, books… not yet distributed (see orphan works) and/or not commercialized

    a so-called LEGAL FILESHARING SITE, cannot have the whole vastity of material present, lets say, on thepiratebay.org, and, generally speaking, cannot compete with filesharing sites

    I can be interested to some obscure movie or book or music not yet commercialized, that companies dont sell anymore, and I can be unable to find on this *ridicolous * *legal filesharing site*

    once found, if I have enough money (money is the key in buying process), maybe I can decide to looking for a phisical dvd or cd or book

    I can find book/cd/dvd used and buy. This money goes not to *COMPANIES*, but to private people that dediced to sell to me this item

    this is the key *MONEY*. filesharing between people is dangerous for the greediness of companies, since the money put in circle for physical items not yet commercialized, goes in the pockets of private people selling items, not in the pocket of the companies

    companies want:

    - clear the historic memory (putting out the historical series, movies, music, books they no more sell – but that still popular), imposing to the people movies, books, music THEY WANT SELL, not that people likes

    - recreate on internet the monopoly they have in the real world

    - use the money of citizens to have laws that help to put out of business competitors (also with copyright-.free or self-produced material)

    excuse me for the verbosity.  I like movies, but since a lot of time I don’t go to cinema and don’t buy NEW DVD (only used by private people)

  • rockadayberry

    by now pirating is an integral part of the culture of our times,but it may well be,that the next generation can be educated into paying for shit again,especially if the movies and the music get worse than they already are,provided this generation finds jobs that get paid.

  • http://bit.ly/oiwlcp Cashhuge.com

    my co-worker’s mother-in-law got paid $21806 a month ago. she is making money on the laptop and bought a $407300 house. All she did was get lucky and put to work the clues revealed on this website, above

  • GreenThumb

    I use http://www.mipnow.com and about.piratereverse.info to bypass blocks and access the Pirate Bay

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/Q3XLTAUAQ2ZSBVFS425HBH2HI4 Ronald

    just as Janice responded I cant believe that you able to profit $9062 in a few weeks on the computer. did you read this web link (Click on menu Home more information)   http://goo.gl/K7VdL  

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gear-Mentation/100003097514663 Gear Mentation

    Ah…. and sooo, what do they do when they find out that the public is already fully educated on the subject, and that most people just download… and the rest join the Pirate Party?  What do they do when they find out that the public JUST DOESN’T CARE about copyright, and that we are willing to bear any negative consequences of the demise of copyright in the interests of owing our own culture?

  • SantoJang

    What the heck are those Denmark people up to I wonder? Wow.
    Anon-Surfin.tk
     

  • Guess

    “having manufacturers build automatic technical solutions into hardware of the future.”

    thats a worrying development, V-chip anyone? given what the copy wrong industrys have been trying to push through in the states (sopa/pippa) as well as the example of universal’s actions with regards to the mega upload song on youtube it’s extremely worrying about the “automatic technial soloutions into the hardware” and the potential abuses this would allow mpaa/riaa/bpa etc to do…

  • http://supertshirtshop.com/t-shirt-designs/funny-t-shirts funny t-shirts

    I guess from now on, when a child yanks a toy away from another child and yells “MINE!”, parents should reward them. After all, sharing toys robs the toy company of a sale they would have otherwise made to the other child’s parents. Sharing is stealing!

  • Guest

    Censorship will be accepted.

  • theonlyone

    It appears that rightsholders will step in to educate the masses on this issue.
    “Rightsholders have stated that they will take the initiative to
    create an information task force that will pro-actively target and
    communicate with Internet users on relevant sites and forums,”

    This is going to be interesting. Have you ever seen alligators being fed chickens.

  • Pingback: Report: US, Israel Started Flame War | Soundabble.me

  • AsteriskCGY

    At most educate people that musicians still have to “make food.” 

    • foff

      Fuck musicians if they can’t make money singing then they can fucking work a Mcdonalds for a living like millions all over the world.

      • cecilia FXX

        sounds to me like you are ONLY capable of working at MacDonald’s.

        Musicians like every OTHER artist deserves to be paid for their creative work. What the Big Businesses who wish to send everyone to jail is expressing their own greed. They don’t give a rat’s ass about paying artists. They want ALL the money for themselves.

        • http://twitter.com/joshtarle Josh Tarle

          It’s the bloated bureaucracy of media companies that is no longer needed and serves zero function other than to perpetuate it’s own existence. These bodies are societal cancers that must be purged before they continue their run-away destructive expansion. The result is money meant for producers of content and those that directly support them through marketing & access to infrastructure is instead being sucked up by this tumorous monstrosity (RIAA, MPAA et al). Just like in a cancer patient, if the tumours can’t be starved or destroyed they will spread and grow until they eventually kill the host. That’s the funny thing about cancer; it perverts even the most universal principle of self preservation.

  • Pingback: Dinamarca renuncia al sistema antipiratería de tres avisos | TICbeat

  • Pingback: Denmark Decides To Educate Internet Users Regarding Privacy | TheTechJournal

  • Pingback: Dinamarca descarta los avisos por compartir archivos lanzando iniciativas de servicios legales

  • Nick

    they don’t understand, ppl use piracy cuz they are too poor to pay 70$ a freaking video game..

  • Pingback: Dinamarca descarta los avisos por compartir archivos lanzando iniciativas de servicios legales | InFORMAT

  • Dupe

    explain to me, please, how anything that is going to allow the persecution of file sharers, even over their own legally bought content, can be perceived as good when there has been no definite resolve from the entertainment industries to really do anything different to what they have been doing all along, ie, discriminating, lying, bribing, suing. if there are no changes to accommodate the needs of the paying public, things will just continue on as before, with no one gaining a thing!

  • Pingback: Dinamarca descarta los avisos por compartir archivos lanzando iniciativas de servicios legales | Q-Bit – Tecnología e Informática

  • Pingback: Dinamarca descarta los avisos por compartir archivos lanzando iniciativas de servicios legales - La Isla Buscada

  • Pingback: Dinamarca descarta los avisos por compartir archivos lanzando iniciativas de servicios legales Noticias

  • Pingback: Dinamarca descarta los avisos por compartir archivos lanzando iniciativas de servicios legales | TodoMdP

  • Pingback: Report: US, Israel Started Flame War | Electronic Staff

  • Pingback: Dinamarca descarta los avisos por compartir archivos lanzando iniciativas de servicios legales « BlackBerry Warez | Blog

  • Sp

    You’re missing the update. IFPI refuses to have anything to do with the legal initiative and they’re opinion is that the legal initiative won’t work anyway.

  • Pingback: Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative | Mediafire Search Engine

  • Pingback: Grooveshark on iPhone until ISPs block - ProductReviews

  • heyheyhey

    Denmark’s digital offerings SUCK and is barely non-existent besides Itunes. It’s no wonder so many people pirate here!

  • Pingback: Dinamarca rejeita resposta graduada e opta por modelo simplificado de bloqueio de sites - Observatório Brasileiro de Políticas Digitais

  • Pingback: Denmark Kills File-Sharing Warnings, Launches Legal Services Initiative | Hosted File Share

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.