DRM is ****, RIAA Says

Written by Ernesto on July 19, 2009 

For years the RIAA has defended the use of DRM, much to the dislike of millions of honest customers who actually paid for their music. Now, in a shocking turnaround, the outfit seems to have come to the realization that DRM does more harm than good and has officially declared its death.

riaaThe digital music landscape is evolving continuously. Just two years ago RIAA chairman and CEO Mitch Bainwol defended the use of DRM on digital music because customers would benefit from it.

“DRM serves all sorts of pro-consumer purposes,” he said at the time, without going into detail about the alleged benefits.

However, in the year that followed the numbers of consumers calling for DRM-free music increased and more labels and music services started to offer music without digital restrictions. Still, the RIAA was not convinced that there could be a future without it, and predicted a comeback for DRM last year.

Quite the opposite happened. Although DRM is still present in the majority of the legal music stores, most of the big players have decided to ditch it. Most importantly Apple announced in early 2009 that all music sold via the iTunes store would be free of DRM. This time even the RIAA doesn’t believe that it can be resurrected.

Jonathan Lamy, chief spokesperson for the RIAA declared DRM dead, when he was asked about the RIAA’s view on DRM for an upcoming SCMagazine article. “DRM is dead, isn’t it?” Lamy said, referring to the DRM-less iTunes store and other online outfits that now offer music without restrictions.

Update July 20: Yes, it seemed to good to be true and it is. We just learned the the RIAA never used the word dead in its reply to the reporter. Lamy told TorrentFreak that he only said that there is almost no DRM on (downloaded) music anymore nowadays. In other (our) words: it’s an endangered species, not extinct.

When the most vocal forefighters of DRM say so, it must be for real. Although this is the first time that the RIAA have actually said on record that DRM is dead, other players in the music industry have seen the light before them. Most notable IFPI, who said earlier this year that stripping DRM would “significantly boost download sales.”

In this we have to agree with them. All DRM has ever done is annoy consumers who actually paid for their music. No single piece of DRM has ever stopped anyone from pirating music, it’s quite the opposite as the music industry now realizes.

Previously: Metallica’s Lars Ulrich is Proud of Napster’s Destruction

Next: Top 10 Most Pirated Movies on BitTorrent

161 Responses

1 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:40 by Ma Long

What a shame… I used to love DRM… RIP DRM

2 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:40 by uu

fuck yeah
now let’s see if the MPAA will see sense

3 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:42 by Dellum

IT’S A TRAP!

4 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:42 by HCM

No, RIAA, -YOU’RE- dead.

5 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:44 by Acidworm

Bummer, now I’ve got no excuse not to download songs legally. MY bank balance hates the riaa.

6 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:44 by 4nd

Took ‘em long enough. ^^

7 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:46 by Torrentia

Yay! Hopefuly this will mean legal sites that give drm free music,

8 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:47 by Dellum

In this we have to agree with them…—

You didn’t agree with them they agreed with you.

9 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:47 by Dellum

In this we have to agree with them…—

You didn’t agree with them they agreed with you.

Still it’s a trap, this is after all… the para-state organization known as RIAA.

10 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:48 by Dellum

In this we have to agree with them…—

You didn’t agree with them they agreed with you.

Still it’s a trap, this is after all… the para-state organization that engages in corporate terrorism known as RIAA.

11 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:49 by Ghostofchris

@3

lol

12 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:49 by Dellum

Damn it! delete the second and third comments… and also this one. and please, include an edit option.

13 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:54 by diarRIAA

Oh no. No DRM? We’re all doomed. ALL doomed. :’( What next? Locusts??? :O

14 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:54 by abn

Great, just great… So what we need to turn this Copy protective poop off the media, is to have monopoly firms starting to ditch it… Great, so in order for RIAA to get a freaking clue, giants firms need to become much more pro-consumer, than they already are… Alright, I doubt I can wait that long…

15 Jul 19, 2009 at 22:56 by Cynthia

*tags this article Sudden Outbreak of Common Sense*

16 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:02 by DRM

SUCK MY DICK DRM

17 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:02 by GG

Shit, I have no excuse now not to pay for music :-)

18 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:03 by JM

thank god

19 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:05 by Nokio

rofl. progress always comes painful and slow. it will still be many years before organizations like the riaa and mpaa are dead. they still have way too much money coming in…

20 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:08 by brizzl

Stating the obvious. News at 11.

Now when does the MPAA realize that region codes and encryption on Blu-Ray are doomed too?

21 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:08 by truth

Good news, senseless people have gotten a clue. Now how long until the movie studios follow suite, I predict 10-20 years.

22 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:17 by hardy harhar

anyone of you ever had a drm-ed music file? :P

23 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:28 by JimmyTango

RIP DRM LOL

24 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:28 by Anonymous

yay, lets all spend 10,000 on music and fill up our ipods!

25 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:32 by Hom3r

Guess they finally realized DRM creates more pirates than customers (in more than one way)

Buy DRM Music -> Get new hardware -> try to move your music -> You’re a Pirate

26 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:39 by deadmanamerican

hello drm…see you in hell drm…

27 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:42 by Osno

They’re probably also saying that they have this new pro-customer format they call MRM that will forever end piracy…

28 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:44 by Celesto

Who knows, how long the RIAA will be alive…

29 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:48 by Sendaii

SAY WHA–?

Does April Fool’s Day happen late in the USA? Has Jonathan Lamy fallen down the stairs and banged his head? Is it the end of the world as we know it?

I never thought that I’d hear the RIAA say that. Still, it doesn’t raise my opinion of them, which is just below that of stepping in a fresh dog turd.

30 Jul 19, 2009 at 23:56 by Phrantik

R.I.P. He surely will be missed. I loved it since it never actually stopped pirates but lovely people who use their cash to buy music. Unless it’s Souldjaboy, then they deserve to die then.

31 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:13 by StormCrow

Well, they do say even a broken clock is right twice a day. Tho’ when it comes to the MAFIAA, I’m not inclined to believe ‘em on the exceedingly rare occasions that they *do* speak the truth.

32 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:13 by Sanity

Wait, the RIAA says “DRM is dead”?

Awesome, now I can finally start planning that skiing trip in Hell. On the downside, all those flying pigs will make a mess of my car.

33 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:14 by Poppy

Let’s hope game publishers realize this soon as well.

34 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:18 by RoestVrijStaal

I think RIAA say it only to gain some popularity.

More strangely is that DRM will be used @NeoTPB:
http://torrentfreak.com/ex-grokster-ceo-teams-with-new-pirate-bay-owners-090716/:
” WMA-encoded and fingerprinted music tracks ” = DRM

35 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:20 by Anonymous

“Bummer, now I’ve got no excuse not to download songs legally. MY bank balance hates the riaa.”

NO! Giving money to these criminals? HELL NO!

Boycott the entertainement parasites until they die including crapywood!

Let’s get ride of them before they get ride of our societies.

BOYCOTT RIAA/MPAA!

NO CD! NO DVD NO DOWNLOAD NO MOVIES NO MOVIES THEATER!

36 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:21 by Anonymous

RIAA is Dead, DRM Says!

37 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:32 by r0ck

DRM is a schroedinger cat. You never know if it’s still alive as long as there is a white little touchscreen box to put it in.

Watermarks are still a pain in the butt. Every song bought off iTunes has personal information encoded in it. So re-encoding everything you buy is still a must if you wish to share it.

38 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:38 by Craig

I’ll still never buy RIAA shit because of their terrible public relations and idiotic business practices.

Spread the boycott, keep your pirate flags up and support your favorite artists in other, more direct ways.

39 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:54 by DTS

DRM dead? I wouldn’t count on it… this is coming from the same group who said no new individuals were being litigated since last August.

40 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:55 by cynic

the RIAA is known for not saying exactly what they mean. it’s always good to pay attention to what they DON’T say. Maybe the DRM won’t be in the music files, but in the software that plays it (Windows?) or on the hardware (Trusted Computing, by chance?) and they haven’t said they’d stop suing people or stop lobbying governments to change their laws, or stop pushing for ISPs to implement 3-strikes rules…

Sorry, there’s no history of these people ever telling the truth about anything. I see no reason to take their words at face value. They haven’t earned my respect yet, and i doubt they ever will.

41 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:11 by Phoenix

now it’s RIAA’s turn to Die

42 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:15 by Anonymous

I don’t understand the point in DRM digital files when you have a CD that never comes with DRM because it was made 20 years ago and don’t support it LoL

43 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:19 by Anonymous

@39 Jul 20, 2009 at 00:55 by cynic:

Good point I was thinking the same thing, to them to drop DRM is probably because they think they found a new way.

There will be news soon of something wrong LoL

44 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:31 by Bobe-On (about shnoz)

@Sanity wrote:

“Wait, the RIAA says ‘DRM is dead’?
Awesome, now I can finally start planning that skiing trip in Hell. On the downside, all those flying pigs will make a mess of my car.”

LOL… There room for me? =)

I’d like to take this opportunity to extend an embarrassing hug to all my fellow “pirates” on here (love the reads) and of course Torrentfreak staff. (Love the eyes, newsgirl).

If I’m talking to a friend and someone sticks their shnoz in an attempt to ‘Manage’ my communicational rights, you can be sure one of us will bite off his shnoz.

As for the newstory; DR without the M will live on forever.
Communication/info-exchange is our nature. We’re social creatures. Learn, Adapt or Die.

What’s/Who’s next?

45 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:34 by anon

Great we are making baby steps here… I will stop downloading illegally the day I can legally download my music in a lossless DRM-free format. There is no reason for this not to be the case already. Bandwidth is no excuse. Production cost is certainly no excuse… What is the problem with distributing digital media with the same quality as that of a physical copy?

46 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:41 by Lachlan Hunt

Now it really is only a matter of time before the MPAA reaches the same conclusion. Especially now with Zooks offering DRM free films for sale, albeit with an unclear legal status, it is the first sign of its demise. The question is, how long will it take?

47 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:44 by Bobe-On

If it’s open source/libre/creative commons (maybe commercial– unsure), you already can download music in (I think) better than CD quality, with FLAC (free lossless audio codec) being one format. From what I hear, CD quality’s actually pretty bad and antiquated.
In any case, I hardly believe in buying art/music because of my tentative philosophy that (the intent of) money (making a sale) muddies the purity of the concept and might invite all kinds of “hucksterism”. (see ‘huckster’ in Wikipedia)
In any case, I’ve yet to hear an argument that sways me. Having to make a living doesn’t count.

48 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:51 by Jeff

I find it amusing that everyone here has forgotten exactly how shady the RIAA really is.

Think people! DRM was discovered by some bored programmers who got to delving deep into CD roms produced by SONY years ago.

So now: Our situation- the RIAA claims to be killing off DRM, the deeply rooted software secretly placed on our software in the first place.

IF this is actually going to happen it will, I predict, happen for one reason… to bend us over even harder.

This is exactly what a politician would do in the event of a failed campaign- bury the old, devise a new scheme and try again. the RIAA is simply coming out in a small, discrete press-release and saying “Ok, we were wrong! Sorry guys, seriously, it will not happen again, Just from now on… don’t seach for any NEW types of stronger DRM or encryption software (Because either you won’t find it or you will make us look like fools if you do)”

The RIAA has a history of using tactics such as these- and they will not stop. They have not given up, then will not give up and they will NOT stop using some type of on-disc proprietary system to try to stop people who bought a entertainment medium fair and square. They do not care about us- they care about MONEY.

49 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:52 by We are anonymous

yes victory will is ours ,
RIP DRM you annoyed many consumers and forced them to pirate their music, and for this we salute you

wow the death throes of the RIAA

50 Jul 20, 2009 at 01:56 by annoyance

RIAA speak with forked tongue

51 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:12 by anon

Well its about damn time I have something decent to say about the RIAA

52 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:19 by .neo.styles|nvDX

We don’t need DRM. Shutting down the systems of distribution will be alot more effective and beneficial to the custemor. Piracy is based on distribution and if you remove that from the picture, the whole ethic ceases to exist.

53 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:23 by Bobe-On

Jeff, you have some points, but the RIAA’s a small penny ante operation compared to file/info-sharing– even if you add misguided anti-file-sharing cops, lawyers and politicians, etc.. They might act big because they’re small and they know it.
We have many on our side– far from just us “pirates”– and include many of the above-mentioned professionals, including university profs, lawyers, and probably even cops. Not all cops have their heads up their asses. :)

54 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:30 by diarRIAA

The Beast has many heads, but each head is lethal and will strike you when it believes your guard is down delivering a fatal blow.

Never trust the RIAA or MPAA. They’re out to try to get everyone; male or female, boy or girl, young or old, innocent or guilty, and they won’t be happy until they own us all and have us completely under their control.

I don’t trust them. I never have and I never will. They’re cooking up something else which is no doubt a big advantage to the consumer. Yeah right…I was born yesterday.

55 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:37 by Anonymous

Really? Is DRM the TRUE meaning for you pirating your music? I seriously doubt that. I think the real reason is you want it for free because you know you CAN get it for free with minimal chance of getting caught, I mean who would pay for something if you can get it free?

2 lemonade stands next to eachother.

One of them is selling lemonade for 10c and the other has no attendant looking after it.

Do you pay 10c to the attend of shop one for a cup or just take the the whole jug for free from shop two?

56 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:38 by kiwishare

What?,”not all cops have their heads up their asses?.”id believe that as much as id believe the RIAA’s latest statement!

57 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:54 by BananaFella

I can’t help but think that this is some sort of plot against pirates.

58 Jul 20, 2009 at 02:55 by Dial Up Modem

First Post !

59 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:01 by That Person!

DRM is gone.But after all this time they realized it was bad? Something is wrong. But it wont stop pirates from getting free music. The RIAA thinks pirating will just go away like magic if they announce that “DRM is dead”.

60 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:11 by Anonymous

Do you pay 10c to the attend of shop one for a cup or just take the the whole jug for free from shop two?

This seems wrong the right comparision would be.

Do you pay 10c to get and exact same copy of the juice or you just copy it and leave the original there.

61 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:16 by Anonymous

Do you pay 10c to get and exact same copy of the juice or you just copy it and leave the original there.

Would you pay 10c for the juice over there or just make your own that is equal in every form or way to the other paid one?

I rather make my own and it probably will cost me more then 10c too LoL

62 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:17 by Anonymous

Well whatever I was thinking along the lines of buy a single/album or download an discography, which is usually what people do (as far as I know).

63 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:29 by Mercer

Trust no one

64 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:32 by Anonymous

59 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:17 by Anonymous

Well whatever I was thinking along the lines of buy a single/album or download an discography, which is usually what people do (as far as I know).

Would you pay for radio? why?

65 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:35 by Anonymous

Why is that music on the internet have to be compared to CDs when its anything but like it?

The most close thing to the internet before is radio and TV why people compared it to CDs?

66 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:40 by Anonymous

Even the RIAA knows that since they tried outside the U.S. to force Canada to impose the same regulations that broadcasters have.

No success of course but still shows that those muppets know the difference.

67 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:42 by GrX

somebody should get in touch with this new piratebay founder GGF and explain this to him before he kills the new site lol..

wow lets see who would of thought drm was a bad idea, what or who in their right minds would think making people buy something then setting restrictions on what they can do with that purchase was a bad idea?

oh wait.. everyone

i remember their speeches DRM is great as without it we can’t give a customer a premium service and offer them more choices.. always made me laugh reading the last part, giving a customer more choices just how much was these people puffing on the crack pipe when they wrote this???

how is making something restrictive or less useful a better choice for customers..

i once had a bat and ball game going with emails too and from the riaa/mpaa over drm.

my argument was name me one other household thing you buy that has any kind of stupid restrictions.

can you imagine the following.

TV = limiting how many hours you can use it, or what days you could use it, or what room it can be used in.

Microwave = Refusing to heatup a certain brand of milk, or pizza, or limiting how many times you could use it that day.

A LawnMower = it allowed you to cut the front lawn but refused to cut the back lawn lol

A car = Refusing you entry because you’ve used it more than 4 times to go to work today, and mon, wens, friday you couldn’t drive on a certain road.

if someone said all this too you before you bought it you’d think they was crazy, belonged in the looney bin

But yet for years and years customers actually Accepted it!! and paid good money for it and hardly even complained about it..

As crazy as it sounds its the same thing as DRM on music or movies.

Funny that Apple remove DRM from everything on their music saying they hate DRM but yet their other media i.e. Movies/TV shows have DRM and wont remove it now or in the future… talk about backwards.

DRM is back we hate it.. we’ve removed it on music but we refuse to remove it on movies or other media..

lol it’s black and white you either love it and use it or hate it and remove it, you can’t say you hate it remove it half, but half keep it

i understand why this happens now

Every human being that gets promoted to CEO of a company has to sign away every single bit of common sense he has, then he is made to walk though this Machine that makes them plain dumb on a daily basis.

68 Jul 20, 2009 at 03:56 by Anonymous

@61

No, no I wouldn’t buy a radio. Why? Because I don’t listen to the radio I have (which I didn’t buy either).

69 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:11 by lll

But DRM is very much alive and well on Blu-Ray, whose built-in update ability has been making it harder and harder for pirates to crack the ever-changing encryption.

70 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:35 by .neo.styles|nvDX

Never trust the RIAA or MPAA. They’re out to try to get everyone; male or female, boy or girl, young or old, innocent or guilty, and they won’t be happy until they own us all and have us completely under their control.
I love how you portray the RIAA as a bunch of demons, just because they make pirates face the reprocussions of their own actions… and that’s exactlty a pirates worst enemey : accountability.

You only have to be afraid of them if you are stealing things.

71 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:36 by PetFoodz.Info

Apple\Amazon: We’re removing the artists from our stores if you don’t let us sell DRM free..

RIAA: We think your bluffing you can’t compete without our artists..

Apple\Amazon: Fine read our press release then..

RIAA: (1 day later) Uhhh ok fine..

They were forced to drop DRM they had no choice.. Or they would of been strictly in the red market wide..

72 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:38 by PetFoodz.Info

@55 …

Speaking for myself I wouldn’t take the whole jug.. If the station was self serve I would take one cup for free.. Not the entire jug like you would.. It is called sharing.. Not whording..

73 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:47 by PetFoodz.Info

@70 Neotroll Wrote:

I love how you portray the RIAA as a bunch of demons, just because they make pirates face the repercussions of their own actions… and that’s exactly a pirates worst enemy : accountability.

You only have to be afraid of them if you are stealing things.

Actually that is not true.. Especially if you live in the EU nowadays.. Running an open wifi AP NeoTroll? On an ISP rolling dynamic IPs (Which is the majority of ISPs)??

Your explanation of why so called “pirates” should be afraid is moot..

While everyone working for the RIAA\MPAA may not be demons.. Actions speak louder then words and everybody from the infant to the grandparents, innocent and guilty have been targeted by the RIAA\MPAA. Their actions speak volumes when millions of people are no longer willing to conform to carrying plastic diskettes around with them anymore.. What you are seeing here is that the RIAA is now finally backing down from the use of DRM , largely by force of the major retailers. As they have no utter choice in the matter.. If they did DRM would still be flying of the CD presses with crappy bands\artists in tow..

74 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:51 by mister_playboy

Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out!

Thank goodness.

75 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:59 by PetFoodz.Info

NeoTroll Wrote:

We don’t need DRM. Shutting down the systems of distribution will be alot more effective and beneficial to the custemor. Piracy is based on distribution and if you remove that from the picture, the whole ethic ceases to exist.

Im not sure if you understand the way stuff is distributed these days.. Or even back when Napster was closed down..

Let me take you back in history.. By the time Napster servers were taken offline it was already way too late for the music industry. Although the Napster program itself didn’t search for different nodes I found a few programs ready to go the day the servers went down.. I immediately logged on to a different node and all was well again.. I used Napster for at least 1-2 years after it died..

In today’s world their is no need whatsoever for trackers of any sort.. Or any other form of centralized server for that matter.. Bit Torrent is a remarkable protocol that will most likely never die in my lifetime unless something remarkably better comes along.. That being said trackers are just an easy way for people to stay connected and get the same torrent file everybody else has.. The MPAA\RIAA knows that if they drive the community underground it could be devastating for them.. So they play the game and go after a few big dogs and users here and there.. They will never ever stop piracy so attempting to close down every single distribution point is a waste of time as they already know and you seem to lack..

As for benefiting the customer, its rather easy.. If you are an artist.. Distribute your music on your own terms in your own ways.. If you make a deal with the RIAA your rights are gone along with the majority of any bit of profit as well.. Give it away build a fan base then make 1$ instead of 1 cent per download..

76 Jul 20, 2009 at 05:32 by Mori [FR]

I guess everyone needs sparks of wisdom occasionally.

77 Jul 20, 2009 at 05:37 by Anonymous

69 Jul 20, 2009 at 04:11 by lll

But DRM is very much alive and well on Blu-Ray, whose built-in update ability has been making it harder and harder for pirates to crack the ever-changing encryption.

Search for blu-ray iso and tell us what you see. Seeing is believing LoL

The only people who can’t watch is the poor sods that pay for it and want to stream it or use and media center to do it, those people are out of luck.

78 Jul 20, 2009 at 05:38 by Gss

@45 Isn’t itunes music DRM-free? The reason I download music with bittorrent is because I don’t have the money to pay for it. So whether music is DRM-free or not really makes no difference to me. Either way, I can’t pay for it.

BTW, how does RIAA plan to stop copyright infringement without DRM? Kind of odd that they would come out and say this.

79 Jul 20, 2009 at 05:40 by naoner

The RIAA have finally discovered the internet, those they work for now ARE the internet/major ISPs.

That’s why they’ve announced no more lawsuits, and that’s why they’ve now announced no more DRM… next, thanks to DPI, they will announce NO MORE FREEDOM..

80 Jul 20, 2009 at 05:43 by Gss

What’s with this new propaganda about torrents not needing trackers? What a bunch of hogwash. If torrents didn’t need trackers, then they wouldn’t use them. Anyone who tells you that trackers aren’t needed is most likely an RIAA shill. Tell them to fuck off.

The reason why they want you to believe that trackers aren’t needed is because trackers made it possible for even the layman to use torrents. Hackers have always been able to share but trackers made everything easy for people.

81 Jul 20, 2009 at 05:47 by Anonymous

DPI only works on unencrypted channels.

82 Jul 20, 2009 at 06:27 by anonymous

I wish it was the RIAA scum who are dead!

Back to dreaming.

83 Jul 20, 2009 at 07:36 by Vyhd

Far too little, _FAR_ too late. I’ll see you guys on The Pirate Bay.

84 Jul 20, 2009 at 07:38 by Anonymous

We are the RIAA
we do not forgive
we do not forget
we are legion……..

85 Jul 20, 2009 at 07:49 by plusaf

right, again, this time after about four and a half years….

http://www.plusaf.com/lessons/dearriaa.htm

86 Jul 20, 2009 at 08:27 by Think About it

EULA computer interaction agreement

By interacting with this computer you are hereby granting all rights and privileges to any information imparted to this computer. If you are not the official copyright holder then you agree to be the one actually making any copies. You also agree to license the bypass of any DRM or copy protection existing on any information. Connection to this computer is provided as is with no warranty as to damage……

87 Jul 20, 2009 at 08:31 by moot

a-holes. lol

88 Jul 20, 2009 at 08:38 by Entertane.com

http://www.entertane.com – the easiest site for torrents (movies, music, software, games, xxx) – faster, simpler – and you can search all your favorite torrent sites. No registration needed.

89 Jul 20, 2009 at 09:46 by Anonymous

@Neotroll
“You only have to be afraid of them if you are stealing things.”

Oh!

In that case, filesharers have nothing to worry about, since the act of copying a digital file causes no theft of anything. Whew. :D

90 Jul 20, 2009 at 10:03 by Jono

“significantly boost download sales.”

My revenue simulation models calculates the cost of lost potential revenue to the recording industry at $115 billion annually.

91 Jul 20, 2009 at 10:12 by scuzzmaster11

hahaha. bought one drm song in my life from verison, will never do that again. the vz staffer that explained to me it was drm’d basically told me to go d/l it for my pc, since the phone file wouldn’t move. too funny. goodbye drm!

92 Jul 20, 2009 at 10:13 by scuzzmaster11

*verizon

93 Jul 20, 2009 at 11:48 by Anon

Great!
Now take Securom and all the other faggotry off of games. DRM for games has actually gotten WORSE in the meantime.

94 Jul 20, 2009 at 11:50 by BigFreakinNews (www.bfn.im)

Well I’ll be damned. Good. Not a whole lot of people like DRM, and a whole lot less people like the RIAA.

I posted this story on http://www.bfn.im.

95 Jul 20, 2009 at 11:51 by Anon

@70
#70

RIAA. You only have to be afraid of them if you are stealing things.

Nazis. You only have to be afraid of them if you are jewish or disagree with their ideology in any way.

Ho-hum. Yay for our Neo-Nazi.

96 Jul 20, 2009 at 12:03 by Anonymous

@12 Agree to include a edit option, but only allow edits within an hour or so.
I think thats more in the hands of wordpress though, dont know realy.

And DRM, amazing they finaly realize what the people has thinked and told them for years and years…

97 Jul 20, 2009 at 12:06 by vyvyan

@85
fuck eula and all corporate twats.
I use open source thingys

98 Jul 20, 2009 at 12:07 by vyvyan

@87 don’t you know iframes are evil?

99 Jul 20, 2009 at 12:39 by Nicolas

Sign the petiton @ http://www.ruinedpiratebay.com to keep it free guys!

100 Jul 20, 2009 at 13:27 by albinoblackrabbit

the riaa have finally started to see sense! what happens to all the drm crippled files that people have?

101 Jul 20, 2009 at 13:58 by warrener

Although Apple would like you to believe that they removed DRM from iTunes for the benefit of consumers, in fact, they were forced to do so because the type of DRM they were using was ruled illegal in certain countries. If they hadn’t removed the restrictive DRM, they would have had to withdraw iTunes from those countries.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2087065,00.asp

http://www.out-law.com/page-7691

http://www.out-law.com/page-7689

102 Jul 20, 2009 at 14:08 by Jasper

if they even couldn’t see that that doesn’t decrease ”piracy” they call it that way, i call it file-sharing!!
how can they than be right about file-sharing it isn’t bad!
PEOPLE LOVE CONTENT AND WANT TO SHARE IT WITH OTHER PEOPLE SO THEY CAN ENJOY IT TO THAT’S WY WE SHARE!!

SHARE-
IT’S FAIRE!

103 Jul 20, 2009 at 14:20 by xXx

soo.. like.. does itunes just hand out regular ol MP3s?

Could legal sites that dont blow serious nut sacks be on the way?

104 Jul 20, 2009 at 15:27 by Anonymous

RIAA is dead

105 Jul 20, 2009 at 15:42 by JustMe

that RIAA cake is a lie.

106 Jul 20, 2009 at 16:01 by Youcanbeuntraceable

The DRM is a LIE!!

107 Jul 20, 2009 at 16:18 by mattias

RIAA is Dead

…is what the headline should’ve been.

108 Jul 20, 2009 at 16:22 by originalbryan

lol @Dellum

109 Jul 20, 2009 at 16:24 by Cujo

drm was a failed attempt

110 Jul 20, 2009 at 16:27 by DRM

Why does everyone hate me? – I’m not dead either. I wish I was. *sob*

111 Jul 20, 2009 at 16:28 by Anonymous

How terrible, I was utterly ecstatic when I learned that I could buy something online and be restricted in how I use it.

112 Jul 20, 2009 at 17:36 by Derek

The DRM is dead! Long live Run DMC.

113 Jul 20, 2009 at 17:55 by CDR levy of canada

THEY LIE
instead they are DRMing your internet

114 Jul 20, 2009 at 18:03 by Bystander

So the RIAA finally realized that alienating your customers by trying to strongarm them into buying multiple copies of the same product was bad for business. Uh DERRRRRRRRRRHHHHH! (wipes drool)

Now maybe we can convince them that suing people for $80000 a song isn’t really in line with “reclaiming lost sales.”

115 Jul 20, 2009 at 18:41 by ;)

DRM is dead. Paul is dead. Elvis lives.

116 Jul 20, 2009 at 19:13 by Anonymous

@warrener

Apple never wanted DRM. They have no reason to. They’re in the business of selling hardware, so it doesn’t particularly matter to them where your music comes from as long as you put it on an iPod. The labels, however, demanded that they implement it or else they wouldn’t license their music for sale on iTunes.

If the Norwegian Consumer Council was putting pressure on any one by complaining about Fairplay DRM, it was the labels.

Unfortunately, despite the pressure, the only way the labels would aggree to dropping DRM was to introduce bullshit variable pricing that makes it so a ton of tracks now cost $1.29.

Which doesn’t really matter since buying from the iTunes store means supporting the MAFIAA, so it isn’t an option anyway.

117 Jul 20, 2009 at 19:32 by JS

To those making comments to the effect of “now I have no excuse not to pay for music”:
No one should ever have to pay for music, you could almost call it a human right. If you want to support a band or musician, go to their live shows or just donate some money. Physical experiences of live music can’t be downloaded, but anything else that can be downloaded should be and inevitably will be free.

118 Jul 20, 2009 at 19:35 by lowedude

OMFG aliens are landing on my lawn!!!! help!!!! nuclear winter!!!! praise god praise god!!!!!

119 Jul 20, 2009 at 19:38 by Playboyman

Nye Bye DRM, You WON’T be missed at all. :)

120 Jul 20, 2009 at 19:48 by Pan

R.I.P DRM

121 Jul 20, 2009 at 20:03 by Susan

I downloaded ONE song off of Itunes and because of said DRM, I could not load it onto my non apple MP3 player, I could not burn it onto a disk, I could not do squat with it other than let it take up space on my hard drive and occasionally play it. As much as I am happy to see DRM go, I am suspicious as to what the RIAA will come up with next to prevent pirating… I don’t trust them for nothin’!

122 Jul 20, 2009 at 20:22 by iamdez

If the RIAA is dead… then Kazaa’s new DRM/WMA files are really going to bring the newly reanimated service back to nonexistence.

123 Jul 20, 2009 at 20:35 by Anonymous

121

How does DRM prevent you from burning the files as a data disc? I can understand if it crypts the files to prevent file conversion, but I can’t see how you are unable burn the files just as a data disc?

124 Jul 20, 2009 at 20:42 by Androsszit

Tell that to EA who just announced C&C 4 will only be playable when your connected online. One more game I’ll have to pirate to show these bastards that making games impossible to play for honest customers will hit them where it hurts; the pocket book!

125 Jul 20, 2009 at 20:56 by sharealike

i used to just remove drm’s from the songs but now im glad they’re dead

126 Jul 20, 2009 at 21:18 by Anonymous

Another victory for us brothers

127 Jul 20, 2009 at 21:26 by Ray

Here’s what I don’t get. Why is the RIAA charging radio stations when the music radio stations is usually provided for free anyways. On top of that, it promotes albums more than anything.

The RIAA should just vanish with their overpriced fees and DRM bs. It’s worthless and a waste of time and money.

This is coming from a musician and a man who runs a record company too.

128 Jul 20, 2009 at 21:27 by steve

Sooooo basically they are just charging people for the .torrent files… stupid.

129 Jul 20, 2009 at 21:30 by steve

^^ woops i posted on the wrong article

130 Jul 20, 2009 at 21:40 by Obvious

@juice stand economists – dumbasses, do you have any idea how little it costs to make juices and sodas? The marginal cost is pretty close to zero, you’re paying for the packaging and marketing, just like with music. You should be stealing your juice too, apparently.

@116 mr. apple apologist – you’re thinking of the Apple of the last century. Apple of today makes lots of money from that App Store and will do anything to keep you from ripping it off. You can’t share apps, even free ones, can you? DRM.

131 Jul 20, 2009 at 21:50 by jami

If only someone would tell the audio book industry. Audible still won’t sell you anything but an aac file. Yeah, I could burn it then rip it to get Audible audio books to actually play on my mp3 player. Or I could just not buy some garbage-y product that expects me to do the hokey pokey for two hours to use it.

132 Jul 20, 2009 at 22:32 by MrGz0r

No all we need them to do is say there a failer and we be all good

133 Jul 20, 2009 at 22:32 by Audible Disuser

As long as Audible uses drm, they’ll never have my business. Amazon and iTunes both do now, Amazon first, and now iTunes now that everything is in aac plus, a better sounding format than mp3. I’ll buy music and books willingly, but not when drm is involved, no exceptions!

134 Jul 20, 2009 at 22:52 by Anonymous

The poor sods that bought DRM music, books or anything are the ones left in the cold when servers go down, the player stop being manufactured.

See the very recent case of the ebook that had his writes erased from Amazon and erased the book that people paid for LoL

Then someone ask why people don’t like DRM and they go to filesharing instead.

“Anything that can be done in software can be done in hardware and the reverse is true”

135 Jul 20, 2009 at 23:03 by diarRIAA

@neo.troll

Once again, you’ve even managed to out-OUT-stupid yourself. Your level of ignorance and stupidity never ceases to amaze me.

So let’s just say you’re on the internet. Someone has somehow managed to spoof your IP address, and goes around downloading music and movies. The RIAA/MPAA tracks *YOU* down and sues you for whatever millions of dollars.

You go to court and even if you have done NOTHING wrong, you can still be fined and convicted even without hard evidence.

That’s right. You don’t have to do anything wrong. You’re guilty…and there is no proven innocent.

It can happen you. It’s happen to many others. You aren’t immune.

136 Jul 20, 2009 at 23:11 by Anonymous

Copyright is like that fellow that put a sign in the exit door that read “Greatest Attraction in the World!”, and when people step in they found themselves in the outside.

Anyone who believe in copyright will be bit by it in some form or another.

Markets come and go, there was a time that salt(Sodium Chlorate) was gold or when excrement from doves had armed guards to safe keep it so the kings could make gun powder.

137 Jul 20, 2009 at 23:18 by Anonymous

shut up and get out neotroll no ones intimidated by your crap

138 Jul 20, 2009 at 23:22 by Anonymous

The music industry is an asset that society no longer needs.

139 Jul 20, 2009 at 23:34 by Anonymous

Why is ‘dead’ censored now? o3o

140 Jul 20, 2009 at 23:40 by djshelter

I can’t believe Jonathan Lamy really said DRM is dead.

141 Jul 20, 2009 at 23:46 by Anonymous

The update put a smile on my face, it would be to easy to have the industry give up DRM, things only are fun when the other side wants to fight.

142 Jul 21, 2009 at 00:44 by James

I stop buying music because of the RIAA and co.

143 Jul 21, 2009 at 02:14 by Jonathan Lamy

DRM isn’t dead, it just smells funny.

144 Jul 21, 2009 at 03:16 by surfer

2 days later… you dont read /. ernesto?

145 Jul 21, 2009 at 04:53 by solidox

I’m still not paying for music. Most all the stuff I like is out of print, extremely limited, hard to find anyway.

146 Jul 21, 2009 at 05:08 by Anonymous

lol
the **** makes it look like they said DRM is shit

147 Jul 21, 2009 at 05:35 by ju

god i lol’d

148 Jul 21, 2009 at 05:39 by Anonymous

@Obvious

App Store? Who the fuck said anything about the App Store?

I was talking about the iTunes music store. But I think that was Obvious. :D

149 Jul 21, 2009 at 09:24 by abn

Hey, RIAA-slowpokes, wake up!

150 Jul 21, 2009 at 11:55 by anonymous

i bought a cd with DRM once!

it was also the last CD i bought! if it weren’t for that maybe i would never have found “other ways” to get my music.

now it’s just too late for me, DRM or not i just don’t buy CD’s nor do i ever intend to.

151 Jul 21, 2009 at 18:30 by CDR levy of canada

THEY LIE
instead they are DRM’ing your internet

152 Jul 21, 2009 at 19:00 by Jluna

Just another example of how the RIAA are out of touch with what the people want, and how they want it.

153 Jul 22, 2009 at 15:19 by stream this film!!

http://ilovextra.com/

154 Jul 23, 2009 at 10:13 by TerribleTony

Who are the RIAA?

155 Jul 23, 2009 at 10:26 by Anonymous

@NEOSHITE:
“We don’t need DRM.”

We? LMFAO. Let’s get real now. DRM? It’s not a choice you have. We chose. You lost. Whether you NEED it or not is irrelevant… you’re NOT having it, that’s what WE decided. WE tell YOU. Now, consider yourself told good and proper.

“Shutting down the systems of distribution will be alot more effective and beneficial to the custemor. Piracy is based on distribution and if you remove that from the picture, the whole ethic ceases to exist.”

Let us know when you’re shutting down these “systems of distribution”. Start with the Pirate Bay and Mininova. LMFAO.

156 Jul 23, 2009 at 10:27 by Anonymous

@NEOSHITE:
“We don’t need DRM.”

We? LMFAO. OK, DRM… It’s not a choice you have. We chose. You lost. Whether you NEED it or not is irrelevant… you’re NOT having it, that’s what WE decided. WE tell YOU. Now, consider yourself told good and proper.

“Shutting down the systems of distribution will be alot more effective and beneficial to the custemor. Piracy is based on distribution and if you remove that from the picture, the whole ethic ceases to exist.”

Let us know when you’re shutting down these “systems of distribution”. Please go ahead and start with the Pirate Bay and Mininova. LMFAO.

157 Jul 23, 2009 at 11:13 by Axl

DRM is not dead, it just smells funny

158 Jul 25, 2009 at 17:28 by Peter BP

RIAA: You’re fired.

Use Jamendo and Magnatune. Gove the poptarts (Britney Spears, Metallica etc) the finger.

159 Jul 25, 2009 at 17:51 by DICK REALLY MATTERZ

I’m just waiting for the fucking record industry to die already.

160 Jul 25, 2009 at 19:16 by Grok

I guess they don’t bother to listen to reality until it’s at least five years too late. Everyone else knew that DRM was bullshit, and even the unbiased evidence suggested the same. The only way they can succeed is to pull their heads out of their asses long enough to think instead of drowning in the smell of their own shit.

161 Jul 27, 2009 at 20:27 by Pedro

the truth can be read here:
http://forums.mariosworld.org/

82 references to this post

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.