TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

File-Sharers Await Official Recognition of New Religion

A group of self-confessed radical pirates are pinning their hopes on gaining official recognition of their own unique belief system. The founders of the Missionary Church of Kopimism – who hold CTRL+C and CTRL+V as sacred symbols – hope that along with this acceptance will come harmony, not just with each other, but also with the police.

‘Thou shall not steal’ is one of the most well-known of the Ten Commandments. Although most familiar to those in Christian circles, its message is universal and cuts across most religious boundaries. But while stealing – taking another’s property and therefore depriving him of it – is widely frowned upon, some have a wider definition for the word.

Make no mistake, if the entertainment industries were God passing their sacred rulings to Moses, there would have almost certainly been one more – Thou Shalt Not Copy. But for the followers of a brand new religion in Sweden, this commandment would be against everything they believe in.

The congregation at Missionary Kopimistsamfundet – The Missionary Church of Kopimism – believe that copying is to be embraced by religion and they hope that very shortly this way of life will be officially accepted by the authorities.

KopimiChurch

Founded by 19-year-old philosophy student, Isaac Gerson, this brand new church believes that copying and the sharing of information is the most beautiful thing in the world. To have your information copied is a token of appreciation, say the church, a sure sign that people think you have done something good.

For those thinking this is some kind of late April Fool’s joke, think again.

In late 2010 the church applied to the authorities to be accepted as an official religion. That application was denied at the end of March on the basis that although the church is indeed a community, its meetings did not constitute ‘worship’. Undeterred, the church founders have requested a meeting to find out what is required in order to gain official acceptance. They certainly aren’t giving in.

“Throughout history, various groups around the world have been persecuted by oppressors. They have since taken refuge in religion with a desire for a peaceful coexistence. Without threats and harassment,” the church explain.

“In our belief, communication is sacred. Communication needs to be respected. It is a direct sin to monitor and eavesdrop on people. Absolute secrecy is holy in the Church of Kopimism.”

The church has its own set of axioms, most of which revolve around free access to knowledge and the sharing of information. They include:

# Reproduction of information is ethically right.
# The flow of information is ethically right.
# Remix Spirit is a sacred kind of copying.
# Copying or remixing information conveyed by another person is an act of respect.

The church is also acutely against DRM and other methods of protecting or hiding code.

“To appropriate software (to keep source code hidden from others), is comparable to slavery, and should be banned,” they declare.

Perhaps predictably the church use the ‘Kopimi’ logo (a pyramid with the letter K inside) as their official symbol and hold CTRL+C and CTRL+V as sacred.

Joining the church seems fairly easy too. All you have to do is agree that everything should be copied and information should be free in line with the axioms above, then load the church’s website so that the ‘kopimi’ logo refreshes (or indeed draw it, or copy it in any way) and you’re in. Potential followers can request more information by using the online form here.

In common with many other religions around the world, expect the followers of the Missionary Church of Kopimism to be widely persecuted for their beliefs. Praying they don’t get caught while practising them will offer little protection. After all, even the Pope backs up his faith with bullet-proof glass.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • http://twitter.com/Fluve Fluve

    This is awesome.

    • Jmssmk

      This is dumb. There is no such thing as an “official” religion and really anyone who participates in joke religions are free thinkers and are basically just regular atheists even if they don’t know it.

      If you want to shape politics, join a political party.

      If you want to remove the (evil, outdated, unnecessary, nonsensical) religious artefacts from the dark ages, spread atheism.

      This middle way joke religion won’t be taken seriously in either aspect.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002022297397 Charles Robison

        moron. complete moron. atheism is a stupid movement with no goal other than spreading awareness about things no-one cares about.

        • J. Hernandez

          You may want to re-read your post…

        • Pigfarmer4444

          Atheism is far from stupid. Anyone with half a scientific brain is atheist nowadays.

        • CompleteBrain

          And anyone with a fully scientific brain understands that science and religion are not mutually exclusive.

        • Anonymous

          One of the basic assumptions in science is that nothing is self-evident. That rules out religion, at least until someone scientifically demonstrates that a religion is true.

          To science, unproven facts – like religion are just “not demonstrated assertions”. Exactly like the assertions “I can fly like superman” or “there’s a teapot orbiting the Sun”.

          This “I need proof of everything” is called skepticism. And skepticism is an all-or-nothing thing; you are either totally skeptical, or you are not.

          This applies to science itself, down to its most basic assumptions – all scientific facts are (or should be) continually re-evaluated. That’s how science advances.

          If you don’t demand proof in order to believe in religion, then you are not being fully scientific. You are being scientific about some things, and not about others.

        • Notanihilist

          No, one of the basic assumptions of science is most certainly NOT that nothing is self-evident.

          What you are referring to is nihilism.

          Your description of of what science is one example of something that is taken to be a self evident approach to gaining knowledge in science, and is taken to be self-evidently what science is about.

        • YouWouldntDownloadAToilet

          I’m not really replying to any above posts, I’m just replying to try and make a quote pyramid…

          Join in, peoples!

        • Oskar Limka

          In fact, come to think about your post, you seem to be confusing religion as a psychological phenomenon that affects many (most?) humans and the objects a religion tells you to believe in.

          Belief exists, it can be proven scientifically. Hence religion exists.

          You may argue whether deities (the objects of religion, but not religion itself) do not exist. But that’s another matter.

        • Gowron Rodex

          To quote Einstein, Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.

        • Tidaltree

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Wilber

          Pyramid project on the way… *g*

        • Anonymous

          Some might call this “too much”, but I personally believe that not only are they not mutually exclusive, they CANNOT be mutually exclusive.

        • Pigfarmer4444

          Atheism is far from stupid. Anyone with half a scientific brain is atheist nowadays.

      • http://nannirk.net/ Marius Krinnan

        You do not have to be a theist to follow a religion.
        Not all religions need a definite deity.

      • Anonymous

        you’re dumb… there are only two religions in the world, 1. mine and 2. everyone elses

      • Anonymous

        you’re dumb… there are only two religions in the world, 1. mine and 2. everyone elses

      • Anonymous

        I prefer “Scientific Realist” to “atheist”.

    • CTRL+C AGNOSTIC CTRL+V

      Thou Shall Not Copywrong! <3

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QZIXK2LOJMBPMJ3BNINWN7UTKA Kara

    Moses would never have got his religion started if this had been the case. A lot of the doctrines in the Bible are ‘derivative works’ that copy ideas from older religions.

    • Whatever

      Which Moses ?

      The MAFIAA has one too.

  • DTR

    I just converted

    • DownloadABikeInPokemonRed

      Me too. I just converted from MP3 to FLAC, and I haven’t looked back!

      • anon

        Lossy –> lossless… just no.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FCNK7C55CBUYFVSC5LNWKB322E Buglord

    and I thought I’d never join a religion… Sweden.. just too awesome..

  • Pingback: File-Sharers Await Official Recognition of New Religion | Torrentfreak.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000469471144 Bas Koene

    I’ll stay Atheist, sorry. I just think religions are wrong.

    • r3loaded

      Atheism != non-religious. It just means not believing in a deity. For example, Buddhism is largely an atheistic religion.

      • AnonBuddhist

        Atheists are philosophers. I hate to break it to ya but, Buddhism is a Philosophy not a religion. Just so you know.

        • Bluebeard80

          Buddhism is indeed a religion, and has a huge host of various demons and demiurges and whatnot. Read more.

      • Jayheart12

        And yet Buddhist’s treat Buddha as some sort of deity blurring the line of so called “atheist/philosophical” religion.

      • Jayheart12

        And yet Buddhist’s treat Buddha as some sort of deity blurring the line of so called “atheist/philosophical” religion.

        • Pugz

          It’s all about interpretation. You can just accept that the Buddha was simply a man with a philosophy that he taught. You can still follow Buddhist principles without involving anything supernatural. I’m an atheist yet I think Buddha or even Jesus teach a good code of ethics even by today’s standards. Religion isn’t simply only about worship of a divine higher being, it teaches morality. Sadly most of the message is lost on the majority of people. In my opinion the Bible was never a book about God, it was a book about us – human beings, in all of our diversity. The best and worst of our traits alike. There is good in religion though you need to find it, and it needs to be done on a personal level. When it becomes an organized religion taught by many people it’s prone to exploitation and the good in it is often lost as it becomes a powerful vehicle in which to control people, and to attain personal power.

        • Pugz

          Oh and I forgot to add to my point about learning morality from religion – The old testament sells fear and guilt, but the new testament is a good code of ethics.

        • SirEdwin

          That is silly. Morality does not stem from religion.

        • http://www.facebook.com/keishenra Kyle D. Johnson

          Take an ethics course and get back to us on that.

        • http://www.facebook.com/keishenra Kyle D. Johnson

          Take an ethics course and get back to us on that.

        • http://www.facebook.com/keishenra Kyle D. Johnson

          Take an ethics course and get back to us on that.

        • Anonymous

          Agree. Morality does not exist because of religion. ( although is a complex debate that is unanswerable)
          Children learn morality , through social interactions.
          Morality is based on empathy.
          And.. ffs… Humans are naturally empathetic to lot’s of non-human things/animals etc…

          On the contrary , religion “Teaches” ignorance and dismissal of natural empathy , all in the “name of god/s”.

          Religion claiming to be the source of all morality is absurd.
          Has anyone even heard of the dark ages ?
          How many wars does it create ?
          How much intolerance do so-called “”religious moral laws”" create and breed.

          Ignore ALL facts …. let your religion guide you. (you have the moral high-ground)

        • Pugz

          You all missed my point. I didn’t claim that morality originated from religion, or anything supernatural, of course it doesn’t. Empathy is a natural part of most human beings (not all – see psychopaths), but what I was trying to point out was that there are good ethics you can find in the Bible and certainly in Buddhism, provided you use your own head and you aren’t an idiot. People cover a wide moral scale and I think it’s possible that the original teachers, Buddha and Jesus if they were real people, were simply just a couple of guys who wanted so spread a message of benevolence and for people to not treat each other like dicks in their everyday lives.

          That’s the message that is lost in the overwhelming amount of crap that comes with it in modern times. Morally, Jesus was a good man, and the God of the old testament wasn’t – he’s vengeful, angry and jealous. But it’s YOUR reaction to those characters, that are supposed to teach you something, exactly how reading any work of fiction teaches you things about yourself. Just like ancient Greek mythology used stories of gods to tell tales about the nature of human beings, I think the Bible does the same thing and is not to be taken literally as the word of god.

        • Pigfarmer4444

          Of course morality doesnt stem from religion. Its true that most religions have a moral guide, but looking at the morals of the christians throughout the last 500 odd years, i am glad i didnt get my morals from them.

          and Kyle below, I hate to break it to you, but religion did not give us our ethics either.

        • Asdf

          Also, I meant to say I’m a raging homo.

        • Pugs

          me too

        • Snorkiedorkie

          lol

        • Pugz

          As puerile as that was, even I found that funny.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Herve-Chubaka-Bagalwa/628563969 Herve Chubaka Bagalwa

        I think its takes faith to be an atheist. How can you strongly believe in the non-existence of something. I think atheists have stronger faiths than most religious people

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Herve-Chubaka-Bagalwa/628563969 Herve Chubaka Bagalwa

        I think its takes faith to be an atheist. How can you strongly believe in the non-existence of something. I think atheists have stronger faiths than most religious people

    • Gleeful Abdul

      Hail allah! 72 virgins awaits you in heaven

      • Anonymous

        Ring Ring. Heaven calling.

        Sorry but we ran out of our young sweet innocent virgins long ago due to an advertising mistake. It should have been 1 virgin for every 72 sacrifices.

        We do however have plenty of fat hairy well used whores left in stock. We can still complete the offer through a small hymen restoring operation.

      • Bob

        Heaven is a gay club in London!….Does Allah know you frequent these places?….You turd burgler.

      • Anonymous

        All those virgins they promise probably turn out to be old strictly-religious nuns…

      • Scary Devil Monastery

        In the words of Jeff dunham…”No one said the virgins would be female, did they?”.

        And saying that i’m imagining a horde of unwashed beer-bellied no-hopers with hardons standing patiently inside the gates awaiting the poor suckers who bought the propaganda…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000469471144 Bas Koene

    I’ll stay Atheist, sorry. I just think religions are wrong.

  • Whatever

    That explains why believing in Martians won’t get you tax cuts.

    You need to “worship” … in other words you need to obey and answer to some form of authority (be a slave).

    How is the “worship” part filled in here. Wouldn’t hurt to have some imaginary copy god. No more imaginary than MAFIAA property.

    • bumpoo

      The act of sharing with our peers IS worship. We come together an share in what is most dear to us.

      In most religions men aspire to gain entry into heaven through worship – a selfish god-fearing individual act. We on the other hand aspire to become seeds and to gain the necessary data that we too may share all we have with the swarm.

      ..or something like that. :P

  • Whatever

    That explains why believing in Martians won’t get you tax cuts.

    You need to “worship” … in other words you need to obey and answer to some form of authority (be a slave).

    How is the “worship” part filled in here. Wouldn’t hurt to have some imaginary copy god. No more imaginary than MAFIAA property.

  • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

    Hey!!!
    Jesus did it first (allegedly :o )

    http://cdn.10dailythings.com/images/2010/10/piracy-jesus.jpg

    • Lulz

      Priceless.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PXX4S66KOUIGIKTTIMV3CBGO7Y Colin

      The picture caption should read,
      “No thanks, I’ll have the steak.”

    • Anonymous

      lol…. he didn’t even own the copyright for those loaves.

      put a smile on my face. :)

      • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

        Teehee :)
        I guess it is the first ever recorded session of c&p where JC simply copied the bread + fish and pasted them directly into the needy hands of his hungry audience.

        So if Pirates/filesharers already have the Son of God on our side, is there really any doubt the U.S. Courts will be persuaded to side with us against the terrorist attacks of the MAFIAA and other minor players in this stupid war?

        After all, they only have lawyers – we have the events of the Sermon on the Mount.

        • Anonymous

          Sharing has always been ethical. Kindness, generosity and friendship.

          The real problem is being ethical and moral in a corrupt society that values money and greed. The great Satan as some countries would say.

          You may recall the Christian view concerning greed like when Jesus overturned the tables of the money lenders in the market.

      • http://disqus.com/ Rob8urcakes

        Teehee :)
        I guess it is the first ever recorded session of c&p where JC simply copied the bread + fish and pasted them directly into the needy hands of his hungry audience.

        So if Pirates/filesharers already have the Son of God on our side, is there really any doubt the U.S. Courts will be persuaded to side with us against the terrorist attacks of the MAFIAA and other minor players in this stupid war?

        After all, they only have lawyers – we have the events of the Sermon on the Mount.

  • GreyWolf

    Slow news day??

  • Momo

    Hey, I thought copyright was the religion and copyright supporters the religious extremists, while open-minded pirates were the ones interested in rigorous debate and evidence-based lawmaking…!

  • Tuxie

    Our Torrent in The Cloud, hallowed be your filename.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SNEGX3IQKOO47C67A3UCS2VBVU Don_Maxis

      LOL! Amen, my peers and seeders…

  • Tuxie

    Our Torrent in The Cloud, hallowed be your filename.

  • Qq

    Could they share sources of their site? I like it. The design is up-to-date. :)

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000894769768 Kenneth Tarmann

      Who needs sources? Just Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V!

    • Anonymous

      View ? Source ? Ctrl-C Ctrl-V

  • Qq

    Could they share sources of their site? I like it. The design is up-to-date. :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000894769768 Kenneth Tarmann

    I’d sign up but I have no idea what the page says.

    • Baatman

      click on “ENGLISH”

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000894769768 Kenneth Tarmann

        *facepalm* I figured that much out, but no other page besides the “English” one is in English.

  • Pingback: File-Shares Await Official Rocognition of New Religion

  • http://mimor.be Mimor

    All suggest in the form to provide them with a translation from english to your own motherlanguage…
    Let it spread like fire!
    Copy the site, spread the word!

  • Because You Can’t Torrent Beer

    Some village has lost their idiot… It takes all kinds

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000565733499 Joseph Cairns

    There needs to be a USA version of this now :)

  • derp

    thou shalt feast on thy holy copypasta

  • John Space

    In Ctrl+C we trust.

    • Anonymous

      You cant truly believe in and follow CTRL+C unless you do CTRL+V.

      It is like saying God wants you to copy and you believe in that but without paste you are not yourself following this advise.

      • Lothor The Evil

        True. If you don’t do CTRL+V then you are being selfish and not sharing. LOL

        • Anonymous

          Be careful to those people who believe in the unholy CTRL+X when they bring sin to our CTRL+V.

          Also CTRL+Z should be a universal holy symbol when to undo mistakes and sins can be very useful.

          Not all can be undone.

  • start in usa

    easiest way to be recognized as a religion in other countries is to start in the usa. some states only require 3 people or so to start a religion so if you start in one state like that and then get more followers you will be able to move into every state. once something like that happens then other countries will take you a bit more serious. look at the scientology i think it is called they are accepted in a load of countries and some people do not even call it a religion they call it a sect lol

    • Anonymous

      Here in the UK we need 1000 confirmed followers to be recognised as an official religion.

      A few years ago we got Jedi (as in Star Wars) made an official religion.

      So a Church of Copying has hope. I would have done this myself but I lack time and resources.

      Hit 1000 then the copyright side violate your religious beliefs.

      • Phobophobia

        the census forms are still sat on the table…

        …a smile appears on my face.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, what a great idea. Why didnt I think of that lol.

  • jack.ss

    Come on man, every sane pirate knows that it is only one true religion on this planet and that is FSM, PASTAFARIANISM. To quote from the holy scripture The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster:

    In the beginning was the Word,
    and the Word was “Arrrgh!”
    —PIRATICUS 13:7

    FSM’s gospel is the only one that comes with a disclaimer:

    Disclaimer
    WHILE PASTAFARIANISM IS the only religion
    based on empirical evidence, it should also be
    noted that this is a faith-based book. Attentive
    readers will note numerous holes and contradictions
    throughout the text; they will even
    find blatant lies and exaggerations. These have
    been placed there to test the reader’s faith.

    If you don’t believe FSM exist, check it out yourself – There is plenty of sightings around the world, and hundreds maybe thousands have been made available on the Internet for all people to see and become amazed.

    RAmen

    • Invisible Pink Unicornist

      Are you denying the existence of the Invisible Pink Unicorn? Heresy!!!

    • Invisible Pink Unicornist

      Are you denying the existence of the Invisible Pink Unicorn? Heresy!!!

    • Invisible Pink Unicornist

      Are you denying the existence of the Invisible Pink Unicorn? Heresy!!!

  • Anonymous

    Stop conflating copyright infringement with theft. It’s not “stealing”.
    I can’t believe there are now people on BOTH sides of the argument that need to be told this…

    • Anonymous

      -1 for not reading.

      But while stealing – taking another’s property and therefore depriving him of it (Something that does not happen when you make a copy) – is widely frowned upon, some have a wider definition for the word (That definition being; that it is also stealing when no one is deprived of their property).

      And then we probably end up with the discussion about fictive / possible profit. That you can steal from a store by telling your friend that they also sell a product in another store.

  • hotdog

    lol interesting concept
    judge + do you have anything you want to say?
    control+v yes I’m sharing it my religion!
    so yeah basically say my god is my monitor my soul is my harddrive!!

  • http://twitter.com/AlyssaBlindy Alyssa Blindy

    I agree with this new movement. Actually, who says there has to be a god? All life is based off the copy, from the beginning with DNA which has been all copied and modified as organisms are born. So, in that sense, life started as copying. So the real religion would be that life is a copy-based process.

    • Anonymous

      I like it. One cell found the way to become immortal by reproducing himself. So the younger copy would still live when it dies. His perfectly copied DNA would live on in the copied body. The rest of evolution is just further adaptation for staying alive.

      But you know you only get special rules if you have an invisible friend. I assume even the law assumes non religious people are mentally more capable, thus have no need for these kind of protective laws. So as a good society we protect the weak…

  • These guys are mongoliods

    This is going to fail, there is no way in hell that any government would see this as a real religion.

    “To appropriate software (to keep source code hidden from others), is comparable to slavery, and should be banned,” they declare. This statement is laughable.

    Slavery is a system under which people are treated as property and are forced to work Slaves can be held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase or birth, and deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to demand compensation.

    That statement is not even close, these guys are clowns. Regardless on what your stance on piracy or file-sharing, or downloading or uploading properties.

    Just from that statement alone, they are claiming that any weapons designer, who codes a missile, should let that program be given to the public. This would also go for any and all software designed for flight plans, air traffic control centers. For safety features in cars, or trains or ships.

    I can’t believe that some people would actually agree with that. Slavery ahahahahahahahahahahahaha these guys are nothing more than idiots.

    • Anonymous

      If Scientology can be seen as a religion by any government, then so can Kopimism.

      You’re right about their “opensource or die” stance being complete bullshit, though. It also contradicts their belief that “absolute secrecy is holy”. Well shit, Isaac, maybe I’d like to keep my sourcecode private?

      Oh well. What’s a religion without at least one totaly self-contradictory rule?

    • You can’t fool me

      they are claiming that any weapons designer, who codes a missile, should let that program be given to the public.

      but if the missile codes is being sold in a store, and someone bought it, he shall have the right to copy it, because he paid for it.

      you are confusing between secret and a product!

      you and your cunning use of words!

      • You can’t fool me

        Oh by the way those ‘products’ (those codes) don’t really exist. The real product is the missile itself

      • Anonymous

        When you buy software, you don’t own it. You merely purchase a license to use it. You do not have the right to make or distribute copies unless the license specifically grants that right. This whole argument about copying is ridiculous, and stems from a bunch of lazy bums who sit around with their hands out wanting everything to be given to them. Mind you, I have 3 freeware apps with open source code. But that’s my decision to make. Should I decide to write a proprietary app, I’ll gleefully sue anyone who violates the license.

        Same goes for music and other digital media. Artists work hard for their money. Copying and giving away their work is no different from putting a gun to their heads and robbing them.

    • Scary Devil Monastery

      I agree. Any idiot who lends an ear to a moral creed that requires him/her to give up valuable and personal time and resources for an imaginary greater good ought to be removed from the gene pool by force.

      “. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
      “And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also.”
      “Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again.”.

      Honestly, this Kopimism thing isn’t half as insane as, say, Christianity, in being far out there, but it’s still a faith-based paradigm w/o any empirical indicia to back it up with.

      • A “divine” being

        You’re missing the entire point of the text you quoted. Jesus’ tried to teach people to be kind, it doesn’t matter if he was the son of God or not, the only thing that matters is that he tried to make the world a better place, if i have to tell people i’m the Son of God to stop people from doing wrong then so be it, that’s all it was ever about, stop the wars, stop the greed, stop the hate, live in harmony with eachother and give to one another.

        • Anonymous

          The whole “turn the other cheek” idea is a massive failure. It teaches people to be victims. The meek will not inherit the Earth. The wolves will. Strike my cheek and see how it works out for ya. ;-)

  • Lothor The Evil

    Just what we need. Another silly religion telling people what to do and how to live their lives.
    The sad thing is, terrorists beat and mistreat their women, blow themselves up taking out as many people as they can, etc. and their way of life is recognized as official religious beliefs, and they refuse to recognize this copy+paste organization as a religion.
    I don’t have a problem with people worshiping something some feel might not exist as long as they treat their fellow man with dignity and respect instead of condemning them for not following their beliefs.
    I get so sick and tired of religious groups trying to force their beliefs and morals on everybody and telling people how they should live their lives as if they have no choice in the matter.
    To me the whole idea behind The Missionary Church of Kopimism seems silly and ridiculous. If they do ever become an official religious organization, I feel it’s quite possible they will eventually become raided and arrested for copyright infringement, then there will be a huge battle about religious freedom perhaps.

  • http://www.tlcministry.net Pastor fidele

    The mystery of the Trinity. Yes hell is real. How do I know that? Because Jesus Christ showed it to me in vision when I was seven years old. He showed me a lake of fire at the bottom of the earth. That tells me that God loves me so much that He would never want to imagine me going to spend eternity in that lake of fire. There He sent me His only son “Jesus Christ” to take away my fallen nature and make me holy like himself so that I would never have to face the fire. I don’t believe that God created hell for His creation to spend eternity not even one. Don’t spend time thinking about the un- Embrace God because no one has yet to make blood from chemistry. He loves you and I know without a doubt He loves me too. I author this wonderful book “The Truth Be Told Collection” You may read a summary of it at:
    http://www.pr.com/press-release/266951

    http://www.tlcministry.net

    • Anonymous

      BEGONE SPAWN OF DARKNESS!

    • Xult
    • Anonymous

      It’s called a hallucination, lay off the drugs buddy.

    • Anonymous

      Did God also tell you to be an internet spammer, Pastor?

      Fuck off.

      Also, you’re a good posterboy for why kids that can’t separate fantasy from reality shouldn’t be allowed to play videogames. “MOM! DAD! GOD’S SHOWING ME A VISION OF HELL, COME QUICK!”, “Yeah… That’s Megaman, Fidele. You’re in Fireman’s stage… Hey honey, you know the number of a good orphanage? Oh who am I kidding. It doesn’t need to be good.”

    • Anonymous

      “He showed me a lake of fire at the bottom of the earth”

      Yes that is what we call the core. The inner core is solid iron but the outer core and mantle is magma.

      Looking into volcanos can appear very firey and hellish.

  • Uppsala

    The home of the group is Uppsala and they study at Uppsala Universitet (in Sweden).
    I read about this in the local newspaper.

  • just pathetic

    This is stupid because religion means no inovation.

    • Anonymous

      There is no innovation in copying only in the technology that allows copying.

      So holy text can provide examples of copying which is moral guidance to copying in the future with unknown technology.

      For example Jesus copied the loaves and fishes to feed the 5000 listeners.

      Now we copy files to feed the swarm. All of 2000 years later and the moral lesson lives on.

    • Anonymous

      There is no innovation in copying only in the technology that allows copying.

      So holy text can provide examples of copying which is moral guidance to copying in the future with unknown technology.

      For example Jesus copied the loaves and fishes to feed the 5000 listeners.

      Now we copy files to feed the swarm. All of 2000 years later and the moral lesson lives on.

    • Kopimist

      disagree. this religion promotes the use of technology – filesharing gadgets like latest hdds, ssds, fiber optics and awsome softwares as oppose to vinyl cds of yesterdays

    • ubercat

      i think its at least very funny and a slap in the face to people everywhere who use religion to justify everything. Christians did it, muslims still do it. The point being, if they can do it in the name of their religion …

  • Pen

    I’m going to create a religion that murders and practices cannibalism. Hopefully the authorities accept my religion as well!

    • Hikaricore

      If I murder and eat you can I join?

    • Anonymous

      Because murding people and eating them is exactly like filesharing. Your point sure isn’t retarded at all. Nicely done.

      • Ljsdv

        No. Home owners DON”T/b kill hotel business. You did.

        You, go kill go yourself

  • Hikaricore

    Why the hell don’t they have a facebook group yet… *rage*

    • Anonymous

      You’re late to the game, hipster.

  • http://twitter.com/A5J4DX A5J4DX

    wow lol

  • Trespass

    Don’t do religion, gave it up for Lent.

  • Pingback: === popurls.com === popular today

  • pantiesniffer

    let the great schism commence

  • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

    Just when you think filesharers couldn’t get any more arrogant, they soar to new levels of narcism and absurdity. Let me guess, Their holy book is going to consist of screenshots of utorrent with their favoritet torrents? Are they going to go to churches that are shaped like giant computers or something?

    • Sdafdsgsdag

      No, but they will acquire the right to download and upload music legally, under the pretense of Freedom of Religion laws =)

    • Anonymous

      Here are 2 definitions of Religion from dictionary.com:

      2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.

      6. something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.

      Now, please, go find a hole and die. Kthxbai.

      • http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm Jack Murdock

        Im not at all religious myself, but most religion has good intentions.. while this “religion” is all about making yourself happy at the expense of others. As if it wasn’t asinine enough, that they were trying to legalize piracy, now they also want to legitimize it with a religion. I hope to god that that people are sane enough to not actually give the go ahead on this bs.

        Redefining creative works with a very neutral term like “information” changes nothing either. It’s still a product that someone (or a company) has invested their time and money in, and if you download it without paying for it, you are doing nothing more than screwing them over. How someone could be low enough to devise a religion that is based on screwing people over is beyond me. I guess when you are willing to launch denial of service attacks against the very companies that bring you the entertainment you devote your life to, it can’t be very hard.

        • Anonymous

          You still don’t grasp what I’m saying: That is what religion is defined as. Therefor, if we decide to start a religion based on the beliefs, practices and ethics of filesharing – then we can.

          Nothing you do or say can change that. You (and apparently your bosses) are NOT the all deciding factor. Neither is the government IMO. That’s OUR decision, fuck you very much.

          So again, please, go find a hole a die. Kthxbai.

        • Anonymous

          You still don’t grasp what I’m saying: That is what religion is defined as. Therefor, if we decide to start a religion based on the beliefs, practices and ethics of filesharing – then we can.

          Nothing you do or say can change that. You (and apparently your bosses) are NOT the all deciding factor. Neither is the government IMO. That’s OUR decision, fuck you very much.

          So again, please, go find a hole a die. Kthxbai.

        • jack.ss

          Welcome back Pirate Jack :D
          We have missed you here at Torrentfreaks comment section o/

          For those that don’t know him, here is Pirate Jacks old FB page with his loot from FOX:
          http://img84.imageshack.us/i/jackmurdockericboehmfac.jpg/

        • Jack the #1 hypocrite

          wow how can he use that pic without the permission of the copyright people. that must be epic, jack, extraordinary epic

        • Jack Murdock

          Yes, I know I’m a hypocrite, so I quickly delete that account http://www.facebook.com/eric.boehm

          Pirate Jack

        • Anonymous

          “It’s still a product that someone (or a company) has invested their time and money in, and if you download it without paying for it, you are doing nothing more than screwing them over.”

          Explain how, fucker.

          That’s right. I’m calling you on it.

          It’s easy to say “when you download a product somebody invested money in you’re screwing them over”, but let’s see you actually prove it. And keep in mind that downloading something doesn’t mean that the downloader isn’t going to buy it, or would buy for it if downloading wasn’t an option. If I download an album that I’d never buy period, then there’s no possible way I’ve deprived the artist of anything. The same goes for downloading something that will never be availible in my region of the world. And what makes downloading any different from recording something off of TV, radio, or an internet stream? If your criteria for filesharing being wrong is that it lets people enjoy products without paying for them, then sorry to break this to you, but there are plently of legal ways to enjoy a product without paying for it. Why are they okay when filesharing isn’t? Come on, Jack. Navigate the minefield.

        • Anonymous

          Addendum: and what makes filesharing any ethically different than simply watching a show on free-to-air TV? I don’t have a Nielsen box and I’m not buying any of the shit being advertised during the commercial breaks, so I’m not benefiting ANY of the people behind a TV show IN ANY WAY when I watch it.

          I’m enjoying a product “that someone (or a company) has invested their time and money in”, for free, and I’m giving absolutely nothing back to the investors. At all. They aren’t being compensated no matter how you look at it.

          So if I download a TV show, what’s the damn difference? How is that less ethical?

          You having a good time in that minefield, Jack?

        • Anonymous

          Addendum: and what makes filesharing any ethically different than simply watching a show on free-to-air TV? I don’t have a Nielsen box and I’m not buying any of the shit being advertised during the commercial breaks, so I’m not benefiting ANY of the people behind a TV show IN ANY WAY when I watch it.

          I’m enjoying a product “that someone (or a company) has invested their time and money in”, for free, and I’m giving absolutely nothing back to the investors. At all. They aren’t being compensated no matter how you look at it.

          So if I download a TV show, what’s the damn difference? How is that less ethical?

          You having a good time in that minefield, Jack?

        • XAnonymous

          “How someone could be low enough to devise a religion that is based on screwing people over is beyond me.”

          I refer you to catholicism..

    • http://twitter.com/cyanidesandwich Jeff Workman

      Wow I didn’t know that so many RIAA and MPAA lawyer douchebag types had time to actually comment on torrentfreak. Go play in traffic.

  • T.H.E. S.W.A.R.M.

    COME JOIN OUR SWARM

    IF NOT

    WHO GIVES A DAM

    WE’LL HACK YOUR ASS ANYWAY

    RESISTANCE IS FUTILE

    AMEN

  • T.H.E. S.W.A.R.M.

    COME JOIN OUR SWARM

    IF NOT

    WHO GIVES A DAM

    WE’LL HACK YOUR ASS ANYWAY

    RESISTANCE IS FUTILE

    AMEN

  • SteRipper

    FINALLY !

    A Religion I can totally stand by, without any doubt or concern. Where can I signup ?

  • http://twitter.com/NoBigGovDuh NoBigGovDuh

    They Worship ThePirateBay Problem Solved!

  • Anon

    I’m still agnostic but I don’t know what to believe any-more!

  • AnarchyNow

    Typical american bullshit. One of the proofs that the worse than nazi U$A has never been a free country is that they never did anything to destroy religions, to the contrary they let people evade the IR$ by turning their for-profit organizations into “religion”, that’s how scientology started (btw the criminal against humanity Tom Cruise should be killed on sight).

    No thanks, I don’t want any “pirate party” that will end up just another right-wing worse than nazi party and I don’t want any “missionary church of kopimism” that will end up being eaten by the worse than nazi god-cocksuckers, all parties and all religions must be destroyed if we want to survive the 21st century, and 2000 years of lies and destructions it’s more than enough.

    Btw, Jesus never existed and Muhammad was a psychotic mass-murdering mass-raping tyran.

    • Anonymous

      Well AnarchyNow, obviously you don’t like America or any sort of religion. So tell me, what have YOU done for anyone lately? When you speak of all the evil that religion has done, does that include all the charitable giving by religious groups?

      Does that include how churches pool their resources to aid disaster victims around the world? Donations to hospitals, nursing homes, universities, libraries, and countless other entities in the name of aiding and bettering humanity?

      You are a sick, twisted individual.

      • B33j4y

        The idea of religion is a crutch. People can do all the things you listed without devoting their lives to something that has no proof and teaches people to accept and understand but push away those who don’t “repent” or “believe”

        • Anonymous

          Christianity doesn’t teach people to “push away” unbelievers. Quite the opposite, it teaches people to reach out to them. And while you are correct that religion is not required for groups to engage in charitable activity, religious groups are by far the most likely to do so. The facts are inescapable. I am not, by the way, a practicing Christian. I’m simply pointing out the obvious.

        • Anonymous

          Christianity doesn’t teach people to “push away” unbelievers. Quite the opposite, it teaches people to reach out to them. And while you are correct that religion is not required for groups to engage in charitable activity, religious groups are by far the most likely to do so. The facts are inescapable. I am not, by the way, a practicing Christian. I’m simply pointing out the obvious.

  • http://twitter.com/IsakGerson Isak Gerson

    The page “Join the movement” has been translated into English now. It’s a simple sign-up page. I wish you the best.

    Copy and seed!
    Isak Gerson.

  • Pingback: How do you intend to fill out the Religion section of the census tonight? - Page 11

  • http://www.webbestchoice.com/ chloe bag replica

    This is all very new to me and this article really opened my eyes.Thanks for sharing

    with us your wisdom.

  • Copyandprint

    i’m in. see you later

  • Ninja

    I don’t discuss religion. But good luck for them ;)

  • Ninja

    I don’t discuss religion. But good luck for them ;)

  • Ninja

    I don’t discuss religion. But good luck for them ;)

  • Donotreply

    ‘Praying they don’t get caught while practising them will offer little protection. After all, even the Pope backs up his faith with bullet-proof glass.’

    The pope-mo-bile.

    Nice article and be interesting to see where this ends up. Ideally I’d like to see it somehow tie in with the Pirate Party.

  • Kan3

    Thou shall copy paste.

  • Kan3

    Thou shall copy paste.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jordan.kratz Jordan Kratz

    Awesome and strange idea

  • borgmi
  • DRuNKeN MaSTeR

    I use Shift+Insert :D Oh, snap!

    • http://twitter.com/IsakGerson Isak Gerson

      Yes, there are a variety of techniques that are all holy (since they copy). I myself use C-, M-w, C-y a lot. Ctrl-C + Ctrl-V are, however, the holiest.

  • Pingback: The Church Of Copying - PSFK

  • Pingback: Kopimism, un’autentica religione basata sul “culto” del file sharing | Follia Digitale

  • Guest

    Still doesn’t change the fact that they’d have to follow the law of the land. Nice try though.

    • Bob

      Eat my droppings…..

  • Pingback: File-Sharers Await Official Recognition of New Religion - wehaveways's posterous

  • Pingback: Missionary Kopimistsamfundet – La Iglesia Misionaria del Copimismo Será mi Religión | POWERPYMES

  • Anonymous

    I guess this is the Winfag’s CTRL-C then. Not the original CTRL-C ‘kill’ command which terminates the currently-running task, and has done since the days of UNIX and DOS.

    • Scary Devil Monastery

      Actually the action of a sysadmin remapping a particularly worthless lusers keyboard settings from Enter to alt+F4 does retain a certain holy status to many.

      And I’m quite sure even for an old and hoary Unix wizard, inventive uses of ctrl-c remain a sacrament in many cases for the same reason.

  • Scatology

    If a money-making scam like Scientology — with neither worship services nor even belief in God — can gain recognition as a religion in the USA, then surely almost any kooky idea can be passed off as a religion. Provided, of course, that there’s millions of dollars available to spend on lawsuits against the government.

  • Orloandofurioso

    please think. doesn’t metter if god is or not, he is independent. just the thing we want!

  • Pingback: ??? ???! – ???????????? ?????? » ????? ???????. ? ?????? ??????? «?????????» ???????.

  • JohnnyQuest

    Hm. Copying is okay but eavesdropping isn’t. Isn’t eavesdropping just a form of surreptitious copying? Communication is information. Information wants to be free. Privacy is withholding information. Privacy is a sin.

    Just sayin’.

    • http://twitter.com/IsakGerson Isak Gerson

      I do agree that it is a very interesting discussion, one of the most active religious discussions in the church, actually. However, it is the act of eavesdropping, and not the act of copying the eavesdropped information that is sacred. Of course, the eavesdropping itself is a form of copying (For example, from light to binary code in a surveillance camera). However, not everything is automatically sacred in the name of religion. Surveillance actually contributes to fear of copying, by threatening people with jail if they copy copyrighted information.

      Besides, if you feel the urge to copy, why not copy something else? Even copying from /dev/random is better than surveilling file sharers looking for copyrighted material.

      • Brian @ aPath.org

        That doesn’t sound like a convincing response. Information should be free or it shouldn’t. Otherwise, how do you define the criteria of which information should be free and which shouldn’t? Is it only personal information that should be confidential? What about your search history? Drug history? Medical data? All of this is information that could be useful to people other than you (meta-research studies, statistical analysis, etc). It would be beneficial for it to be free, why shouldn’t it?

    • Anonymous

      No, it’s not. Piracy is the right to eavesdrop ON YOURSELF.

  • Pingback: A New Religion for Pirates (Internet type)

  • Pingback: ??????? ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ????? ?????? | ????? ????

  • Pingback: The religious practices of copies and uncertainty | Intensifier

  • Clez

    Sweden. A nation of thieving thieves unable to produce anything of their own so they justify their illegal consumerism by making it a God given right.

    • http://twitter.com/cyanidesandwich Jeff Workman

      How’s that RIAA job working out for you, Clez?

    • http://twitter.com/cyanidesandwich Jeff Workman

      How’s that RIAA job working out for you, Clez?

    • Anonymous

      Volvo, Saab, Ericsson, Ikea, Spotify. Actually Ericsson and Sony-Ericsson has lots of problems with their products being copied in China. There’s even a trailer truck producer called Scania that got their entire trucks pirated by a Chinese manufacturer.
      BTW, are Americans stealing the zipper fly from Sweden or are you using all-American buttons?

    • Anonymous

      Volvo, Saab, Ericsson, Ikea, Spotify. Actually Ericsson and Sony-Ericsson has lots of problems with their products being copied in China. There’s even a trailer truck producer called Scania that got their entire trucks pirated by a Chinese manufacturer.
      BTW, are Americans stealing the zipper fly from Sweden or are you using all-American buttons?

  • Pingback: Swedish File-Sharers File For Religious Status | JetLib News

  • alleycat

    atheism is the absolute rejection that some higher power directs. A true scientis would value neither dogmatic religion or atheism (which is dogmatic as well) he or she would keep an open mind because neither can be proven to be true or false. Atheism IS belief just like any other religion while science is based on doubt and redoubt until absolute certainty exists. Check your head, check your stats, check up on your homies cos they gave you bad data …. (i dont have an account here so allley.cat@hotmail.com will do)

  • Pingback: Links 4/18/11 « naked capitalism

  • Pingback: I beat Michie! - Christian Forums

  • Just a thought

    I believe a religion can only be accepted in a country if it does not break the countrys laws, it must be in-line with the laws. For instance, sharia-laws would not be accepted in most countries so that particular version of islam is not ok, but other versions are. Let’s say you have a religion that requires you to murder, that would be against the laws in most civilized countries. Same goes for theft. Since “copying” is illegal in Sweden as well I do not think this ever will be accepted as an official religion.

  • Pingback: La Chiesa del Copia e Incolla - UAAR Ultimissime

  • Pingback: The Church of Data « DATACHURCH

  • theothercat

    woaw thats impressive, but, the big point here is that there are as many realities as there are points of view, which reality gets the upper hand is something thats decided when it happens. If you pick one, you might want to consider the power of your neighbour. If you cant eat him, you will have to compromise

  • Pingback: Fricchettoni Kopimisti at Quasi.dot

  • boodog

    The opposite of “believe” is “think.”
    The religious believe in god(s).
    Atheists think there is no god.
    Thinking allows and encourages continual examination of facts, while belief neither requires nor needs acknowledge any facts.
    Anyone claiming to be an Atheist who only believes there is no god might indeed be religious.

  • Erowid

    Copying is not stealing someone property, it is stealing their work.

    A notebook is worth $1.30.. but if it contains an unpublished novel that tooks months/years to write, then it value/worth can be a magnitude greater in value.

    Same with code.

    Cars are tangable, another manufacterer cannot copy a car and make it themselves, that infringment upon the work the engineers did to make/design that car. Software & music is no different.

    Code/Data is someone’s else’s work. If you deem it valuable enough to want to own, then you are indebted to them. There ARE freely distributed code & music, why take what isn’t, then claim ignorance..?

  • http://twitter.com/bitcoinmedia Bitcoin

    If Kopimi is a religion is the following their search engine ?

    http://www.lmptfy.com/?q=metallica

  • Pingback: Jauna reli?ija — Kopimisms « Droš?ba

  • http://www.aPath.org Brian

    As the world’s leading authority on creating religions (seriously, its #1 on Google), I humbly offer my free guide:

    How to Create Your Own Religion In Ten Easy Steps
    http://www.apath.org/creating_religion.html

    This handy guide will help you properly structure your religion and help you gain legitimacy by copying what others have done.

    By making it look like similar in structure to other more popular religions, you will simultaneously have demonstrated your core principle of copying stuff while making the concepts seem more familiar (and therefore more acceptable) to the reviewing board.

    Cheers and Good Luck!

    All Hail The Great Lord Lardicus!

  • iamthethorn

    by copying what others have done :p you’re already converted to kopimism i see

  • Pingback: File-Sharing Meets Religion

  • Pingback: eamcet*[SEO???????????] | ????????????????

  • Pirate_Bob

    pfffffffffft, everyone knows Timothy Dalton was the best Bond

  • Anonymous

    A minor correction : the name of the organisation in Swedish is «Det Missionerande Kopimistsamfundet». Verbum sapienti satis est….

    Henri

  • Pingback: Sweden and the file sharing religion | Caught on the Web

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.