TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site Blocking Demand

A trio of organizations representing the movie, cinema and TV industries have gone to court in France in an attempt to force Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and the country’s ISPs to block several streaming sites. The groups, which represent hundreds of video-related companies such as Paramount and Sony, want streaming sites blocked to Internet subscribers and delisted from search engines.

Following the introduction of a ’3 strikes’ mechanism targeting regular Internet users, as reported earlier this week moves are underway in France to strangle the finances of streaming and direct download (DDL) sites. Today the direction of the multi-pronged action becomes even more clear.

Three umbrella organizations representing the rights of more than 100 movie and TV-related companies have gone to court in order to have video streaming sites blocked on the Internet.

L’Association des Producteurs de Cinéma (APC), a group which in itself represents more than 120 companies including Paramount and Sony, have teamed up with La Fédération Nationale des Distributeurs de Films (FNDF) and Syndicat de l’Edition Vidéo Numérique (SEVN) for the ground-breaking legal action.

Their complaint, which if successful could spread to dozens of other sites, targets locally popular AlloStreaming, AlloShare, AlloMovies and AlloShowTV. Speaking with TorrentFreak earlier today, PC INpact journalist Marc Rees told us that after speaking with the movie companies he could confirm that an initial report which indicated that MegaUpload and MegaVideo are also listed in the 100-page complaint are unfounded.

With this action APC, FNDF and SEVN are taking on some of the biggest names on the Internet. Google, Microsoft and Yahoo all face demands to delist the streaming sites and services from their search engine results. A range of ISPs including France Telecom, Orange and Free are all being asked to block their subscribers from accessing the sites.

The rightsholders’ claims are rooted in Article 336-2 of the Intellectual Property code, a provision which allows the High Court to take almost any emergency measure to protect rightsholders. With this in mind, proceedings for interim relief will be heard before the High Court on December 15th.

Interestingly, it appears that Google has already received and responded to a DMCA takedown notice (here on Chilling Effects) from the groups listed above concerning Allostreaming.com, AlloshowTV.com, Alloshare.com and Allomovies.com.

Typing any of the domains into Google’s search engine is now fruitless – all of them have been completely delisted, so at this stage it’s unclear why Google remains in the complaint.

Earlier this week a US judge ordered Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Bing, Yahoo, and Google to delist several pages referring to counterfeit goods. This case was started and won by the fashion house Chanel, who were also allowed to seize the domain names. Whether Hollywood studios will follow the French example and file a similar suit in the US has yet to be seen.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Guest

    Guess HADOPI wasn’t a quick enough fix for them. No surprise; Ha-Ha-Hadopi was a monstrously expensive mistake.

    • Guest

      Fuck … what happened to the founders of Liberté?

      • Guest

        What I do NOT use:
        - Google Search/Chrome
        - Micro$oft OS/Bing
        - Yahoo Search/Email

        What I DO use:
        - Scroogle
        - Mozilla Firefox
        - GNU/Linux OS

        It’s about choice.

        • ?? ?

          We offers the worlds finest and most luxurious brand name watches at unbelievable discount prices. Take advantage of our buying power and industry relationships to purchase your dream watch at far below suggested retail prices. We strictly sell authentic timepieces to customers all over the globe. We do not sell any refurbished or store returned watches. Our intention is to secure the rarest and most luxurious watches for our client at lower price then any other supplier in the world .http://www.cheapestreplicas.com/

        • Henk

          have fun gaming, lol

        • http://www.facebook.com/branden.andersen Branden Andersen

          I didn’t know about scroogle, so thanks for that info. Just updated my browser to use it! Thanks!

        • Guest

          @Henk
          Games can also be played but I figured out that gaming is a waste of time.

      • ?? ?

        We offers the worlds finest and most luxurious brand name watches at unbelievable discount prices. Take advantage of our buying power and industry relationships to purchase your dream watch at far below suggested retail prices. We strictly sell authentic timepieces to customers all over the globe. We do not sell any refurbished or store returned watches. Our intention is to secure the rarest and most luxurious watches for our client at lower price then any other supplier in the world .http://www.cheapestreplicas.com/

      • Predator

        The French fonder of liberty pirated the US founders of liberty who came first!

        We have to do this again on both side of the Atlantic!

        • Guest

          American History Classes at it again? Tell us about the bit where the US defeated Rome.

    • Anonymous

      This action highlights that Hadopi is a pending failure.

      My view on such extreme censorship is what they try to hide are some of the most interesting parts of the Internet. This censorship can only be free advertising to draw more people to these sites.

      It is true that Google have delisted these entire sites but I can only wonder why their UK search version is being subject to a French censorship? That for me is a more worrying sign than this court order when this kind of power would allow US courts and politics to censor all of Europe, or the reverse.

      Well Google may have delisted them but Google are still happy to translate these sites from French to English. :-)

    • ?? ?

      We offers the worlds finest and most luxurious brand name watches at unbelievable discount prices. Take advantage of our buying power and industry relationships to purchase your dream watch at far below suggested retail prices. We strictly sell authentic timepieces to customers all over the globe. We do not sell any refurbished or store returned watches. Our intention is to secure the rarest and most luxurious watches for our client at lower price then any other supplier in the world .http://www.cheapestreplicas.com/

    • Herptyderp
    • Ameliaisnude

      they can’t beat http://www.deviloid.net !!!

  • Benjamin Stroud

    File sharing = ‘theft’.

    • Jmorse43508

      Obvious troll is obvious.

      Greedy MAFIAA is greedy.

      See I can make up one liners, too.

    • Zig

      Benjamin Stroud is Goatse

    • ?? ?

      We offers the worlds finest and most luxurious brand name watches at unbelievable discount prices. Take advantage of our buying power and industry relationships to purchase your dream watch at far below suggested retail prices. We strictly sell authentic timepieces to customers all over the globe. We do not sell any refurbished or store returned watches. Our intention is to secure the rarest and most luxurious watches for our client at lower price then any other supplier in the world .http://www.cheapestreplicas.com/

  • Xxxxxx

    even thought the EU outlaws website blocking

    • Reader

      What can really be done about this though? can individual countries ignore an EU ruling, or can they just choose to quote the EU ruling if it suits them?

      • anon

        I don’t see why not, nobody in power cares about laws unless they suit them.

  • Pingback: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site Blocking Demand | TorrentForce Blog

  • PowerlessPeasantBombMaker

    When your liberty is dependent on a boardroom, you know you’re fucked.
    The whole filthy system needs a terrorist to save the day…

  • Pingback: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site … « ???? … ??????? ????

  • Zan

    I assume youtube is on that list as a prolific hoster of illegally hosted material?

    No?

    Funny that.

  • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

    It’s about fecken time the Big Boys started fighting it out with each other rather than hunting and pecking at individual downloaders.

    This is ground-breaking history in action, and something we’ve been expecting for years. I suspect it will take many years to decide, but this is where it starts.

    It’s now USA v EU, and the European Courts have already decided ISP’s can’t site-block indiscriminately, cannot cut people off the internet for CopyWrong infringemnet, and cannot intrude on the privacy or traffic of ISP customers.

    So stock up on the popcorn guys. This is gonna take years to decide as it goes through each level of Court.

    Meanwhile, this may assist -
    http://www.utorrent.com/

    • Jimbo

      as i posted further down, France will ignore the EUCJ ruling and go ahead with this sham. no way is Sarkozy going to allow any result other than one that favours the entertainment industries!

      • IDIOCRACY

        and soon the France has a bank crisis as well and will go bankrupt like greece, who will pay that?? nobody can pay that. this bullshit only costs france more and soon all these futile matters cannot be paid anymore and France has to drop out of the eurozone, .end of the euro zone, euro crisis and after that the crisis will ricochet again to US, crisis there too… end of story, I guess the whole downloading and copywrong disaster is more important than saving the world economy… guess the real smart leaders are still sleeping hehe

  • Anonymous

    So, attacking centralized search engines, eh? I wonder what these fossils will do if/when decentralized search engines take over?

    Sue individuals? Even the MAFIAA gave up on that.

    Sue the author? Open-source; the authorship is also distributed.

    Hmm… I guess they’d demand more arbitrary levies (e.g. on blank media) for a quick buck, and then start trying to destroy the basic internet infrastructure again (e.g. SOPA/PIPA).

  • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

    i can’t wait when the world wakes up and a huge boycott happens against these media companies. The net will never die. As I’ve read somewhere else…

    -The Internet is the new Hollywood.-

    These people in Hollywood are complete idiots. Once their crap is off the net and no one watches their shit anymore. They’ll blame something else and realize they fucked up. When the Internet was always their friend.

    • Cmtx

      They tried to enforced this Law here in Switzerland ..! Yesterday but:

      with no Luck..!!

      Welcome to the last free Country sourrounded by the EU..!!

      • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

        I’m most likely preparing to leave the u.s. and move to Brazil or Canada.

    • Guest

      Ya! let’s give them what they want! let’s purge the net from their craps!

      That will kill them all for sure!

      We don’t need them. We can make our own stuff ourselves specially music!

      We don’t need them to publish and distribute! Deuce!

      • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

        Exactly my friend exactly.

  • Gordon Harrison

    Its about time parasites such as Google, YouTube et al were made to comply with the law. They live fat off advertising revenue linking to or hosting pirated content.

    The ethics of ‘BigTech’ are exposed here in their own words -

    http://www.fastcompany.com/1588353/viacom-google-youtube-piracy-copyright-data-ip-videos-emails-lawsuit-legal

    How piracy is a foundation for a thriving advertising industry can be read here -

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottcleland/2011/11/30/grand-theft-auto-mated-online-ad-economics-fuel-piracy-sopa-opposition/

    How Google assisted in the importation of illegal drugs into the US, and admitted they did so knowingly for the sake of making money, another example of the moral bankruptcy that exists within BigTech -

    http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/August/11-dag-1078.html

    Not that BigContent can be proved to have any higher standards.

    Between the two artists get shafted by both sides. Then pirates and other ne’er do wells are happy to join in the feeding frenzy when some new content appears and they decide they are entitled to the enjoyment of it without paying for it.

    I realise the above is likely to upset some people on this forum. There is a deep intolerance at the heart of much of free culture comparable to the rigid and tyrannical thinking expressed by extreme religious viewpoints, such as the Taliban. Free culture desires to limit people’s freedom by abolishing the copyright domain, that the public domain is the only true path of righteousness.

    If an artist decides to put something into the public domain that’s his choice, respect it. If an artist decides to sell his work using the provisions of copyright, that’s his choice, respect it. Copyright is good, public domain is good. Pirates, don’t be tyrants, be creative yourself and enjoy your human right to choose what you do with it.

    • Sketch6995

      I guess what it boils down to is the artist need to make a product that’s actually worth paying 4, take the band metallica for example they haven’t produced a single album in the last 10 years that was worth 1 penny I’m glad I stole it, there is no current mechanism to return a crappy album your just stuck with it, try it before you buy it is definitely the way to go

      • Gordon Harrison

        If its crap don’t buy it, especially when you haven’t heard anything good from them for ten years. On the other hand, why steal crap, it makes no sense. Go and buy music you like.

        If artists make crap products that their problem. If they make good stuff show your appreciation by buying it.

        • Anonymous

          His point was, he didn’t know it was crap until he had it in his possession. Luckily nobody suffered because nothing was lost in the process of copying.

    • Anonymous

      “Between the two artists get shafted by both sides.”

      How does YouTube shaft the artists? I can understand your stance on the recording industry simply because they leech boatloads of money and rarely accept any artist that doesn’t have their version of “marketability.” But YouTube? YouTube gets artists’ names out there and provides them an outlet for their art without going through the money-grubbing content industries, while simultaneously making the artists money.

      Almost all huge corporations are corrupt, and google is no different. But at least google doesn’t make a habit out of suing old ladies.

      • Anonymous

        Says the person who has obviously never read YouTubes TOS.

        I am a content creator. I am in competition with Big Media. I know that most of Big Medias moves are to arse rape independent content creators who wish to set up a new content delivery system on the net. I know that the end users are being hit in the crossfire. I myself hate what Big Media is doing, because I feel for the end users and I also know every time Big Media has a win, they shut down more opportunity for my company.

        That said, YouTube is the last place on earth I would put my content. I would put my advertising on YouTube, but never the content. YouTube choses if you get to the top of searches (just like the control Apple has in the iTunes store.) and has no obligation to go into any profit sharing contract with you as the content creator.

        Have you noticed that no A Grade content is distributed on YouTube? It is all “Americas Funniest Home Videos” where people are clueless as to how valuable their short home clips are, and advertising. You can see an advert of a movie or a TV show on YouTube, but the content creators earn their money from the show elsewhere, by broadcasting or hosting their shows and movies elsewhere.

    • Guest

      Gordon Harrisson/willaLavie:

      It was not necessary to show up with another name you paid troll We still recognize you and we will still ignore your corporate fake opinion.

    • Scary Devil Monastery

      You post links to what pro-copyright fanatics have written and expect anyone to take this seriously? First of all, in three or four of the links you provided the author tries to bring long-disproven lies to the table, presenting them as “facts”.

      In short – your wordwall fails both in relevance and accuracy.

      As far as respecting an artists “rights” – as far as I’m concerned those rights are an optional extra once the artist distributes the information. Any limitations on how you can spread information falls under the same category of information control as that practiced in China.

      With the sole difference that it is private interests who decide what should be communicated between person A and person B instead of the state.

      Consider your nonsensical dogma emphatically rejected – along with the large pack of lies you linked to. Now back under the bridge with you, troll.

  • Pspebay2010

    Check out this new website on movies, games and football:

    http://www.UnambitiousUs.com – The Online Magazine for Time Wasters

    It’s full of independent reviews and not as predictable as IMDB, IGN and the rest. I think those guys writing them are normal people with a passion.

  • Anonymous

    Piracy is not about sharing, today it’s primarily about stealing and profiting. The cyberlockers are like Amway at the top of the piracy pyramid paying incentives to “affiliates” to spread the download links far and wide. Nowhere else can one steal openly and profit mightily from it. Cut off the blood supply (money) and you will make a significant dent.

    • Anonymous

      And then what? You cut off the money cyberlockers and company are making and people will flock to torrents or DC++ style downloading. No significant dent will be made.

      The only way to stop piracy is to make something else more convenient. Netflix, iTunes and companies like them are the only ones that have made any impact against piracy, but rather than follow their lead, idiot corporations continue to fight an unwinnable battle.

      The irony is, these corporations in the creative industry have no creativity.

    • http://www.twitter.com/echoman74 echoman

      Such a mindless soulless words of jibber a misinformed dumb dumb. If its made for the public to see it’s meant for the public to see. I can’t come to any understanding why people create content and bitch later when people listen to it when the so called “pirates” not all sharing only want to look, review, listen pledge support to the so called “creative industries”

      Then these same scumbags retorts and cry theft and stealing and ohh file sharing is bad. Stop making shit then plan and simple. Going against the public will not make you loved more like hated.We can easily cut off your funds and stop buying shit plan and simple.

      Don’t get me wrong i think everyone should be able to make money.But calling the public pirates and making threats of censorship makes you less likable and a rebellion will be set a cast over you.

    • IDIOCRACY

      You are so very right and so very wrong at the same time:
      Sharing is not Piracy or piracy is not sharing all the same .. you are right, sharing is good, Piracy is wrong (the boat thing hehe) only people use the word a bit wrong nowadays.

      Cyberlockers are a good tool for sharing, for example with your brother or a friend that lives to far away to risk sending your DVD to him arriving there damaged hehe.
      Cyberlockers are also not (yet) targeted by this serving of google M$ and Yahore and are in no means the top of the sharing and certainly not the top of piracy.

      So I guess you just scored 4 points out of 10, that is not enough and I would like to ask you kindly to go and educate yourself some more before you post this half truth again, however cheer cheer for your beginning in understanding that sharing is not Piracy hehe

    • Guest

      Get out of this forum you pay troll! Nobody is interested in your fake for hire opinion!

      Busted!

  • Louigi Verona

    http://yacy.net/en/index.html
    This is a P2P search engine. If this or a similar project will grow, nobody will be able to blacklist websites.

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      Thanks LV, may Google now RIP …

  • Jimbo

    said last week that France and at least the UK as well, would ignore the EUCJ ruling on web site blocking! i bet you anything Sarkozy will stick his 2 cents worth in, showing how much respect he has for the citizens of France and the EU. waiting to see what sort of fight, if any, there is against the entertainment industries. if, as has happened in the past, the industries lose, they will keep appealing and appealing until they do get the verdict they want, regardless of the impact on any other company and the costs for doing the industries ‘policing’ for them

    • Anonymous

      Then in the UK the Justice system have just won their own domain suffix to move away from .gov.uk to highlight that the Judiciary are Government are two very independent systems.

      So the court system may well have issues with anyone wanting to ignore a ruling from the European Court of Justice.

      • Anonymous

        still doesn’t mean the 2 aren’t hand in glove. if the government wants something to happen, it will happen, regardless of what the court should or shouldn’t do. the allowing of Assange to be extradited seems a reasonable example. the UK is too afraid of USA to say ‘no’ and i bet that’s where he’ll end up. whether the public will ever know though, is another thing

  • GODLiKE

    I don’ t live in stupid France, then why must Google be affected on my country too? Make google.fr or whatever be affected, not GLOBAL Google, and/or other regional Google sites.

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      Google Search (and Yahoo, Bing, etc.) can now be permanently by-passed and forgotten as another corruptorate who got too big and greedy to bother with keeping to the reason for their existence, to “do no evil”. Ah well …

      I’ve just now installed the p2p search engine YaCy using
      http://yacy.net/en/index.html

      There’s also the security-conscious search engine IxQuick
      https://ixquick.com/

  • Pingback: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site Blocking Demand | TorrentFreak from blog The Technology blog and podcast

  • Anonymous

    Question for the copyright holders is how much censorship do they think will
    be socially tolerated on behalf of their pecuniary previleges?

    The copyright holders answer that question with a massive frontal assault on
    the constitutional rights and civil liberties of every European and American citizen.

    On one side is a legislated corporate previlege to profit monopolisticly and oligopolisticly in perpetuty from the acquisition and digital distribution of intelectual property. On the other side, are those rights and liberties which all European and
    American citizens have understood to be the moral and political “givens” of their lives: Freedom from prior restraint of the press. The right to due process. The right to privacy. The right to be free of arbitrary searches.

    The question for us, as individual American and Europeans citizens is NOT, descriptively, the sheer “shock and awe” of how far corporate copyright holders are
    willing to travel in the direction of destroying our constitutional and civil rights in defense of their legislated entitlement to a pecuniary proffit.

    After all, the legal previlege to collect a legislated monopolistic premium in perpetuity on the acquisition and digital distribution of intellectual property is in no way tantamount or equal to an ELEVENTH TALMUDIC COMMANDMENT “Thou shall love and honor your media corporations and hold their entitlement to a pecuniary proffit SACRED above all other constitutional considerations.”

    In fact, this entitlement to a pecuniary proffit under copyright law is JUST that, A LEGISLATED ENTITLEMENT, much as a welfare check, or a tax deduction, or an accelerated depreciation schedule; all of which, legislatively granted, can be legislatively taken away.

    No.

    The truly important question for us is, “Why don’t more people get it?”

    It is perhaps convenient that, in this latest assault on civil liberties, copyright interests have picked a fight with other equally powerfull corporations. Yet, this is mere tactical convenience. Google is a patent and copyright holding corporation with a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders; and, can be expected to support the the constitutional rights of individual citizens only incidentally; and, only to the extent that these can be accomodated to the priority of proffits.

    So we must wonder, “How much damage to civil liberties will it take before people
    “get it”?

    What pain will make them realize that corporations have largely succeeded in the legislatures at elevating their entitlement to a pecuniary proffit to a constitutional par with the civil rights of every European and American citizens?

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      Yet another BRILLIANT analysis and explanation TUTD – let’s have babies together :)

  • Pingback: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site … | Apple Bosom

  • http://thegift73.wordpress.com/ Richard Gailey

    So basically, the labels know that trying to get the ISP’s to censor/ filter in the EU is not going to happen after the recent EU ruling http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-11/cp110126en.pdf
    so instead they are going after the Search Engines. Surely, that same ruling could extend to this one as well?

    Google….I really used to like you, but your backbone is really becoming spineless when it comes to threats from these glutinous self centered corporations. Please grow a pair and tell them to fuck off first at least before you tuck-tail in the name of appeasement.

  • censorship is not the answear

    if these search engines start to keep censoring content on the internet as if the internet was china. i guess it is safe to say http://yacy.net will be a huge competitor in the market. And not to forget about the pirate bay dance browser add-on.

    A hail open source save the internet from censorship

  • Anonymous

    Bottom feeding, blood sucking attorneys and the kangaroo court system. WOw.
    invisi-browse.tk

  • HollywoodAnnie

    Really, if they want to stop piracy they should probably stop making stuff. No product, no piracy. Simples.

  • Viking

    Allons enfants de la Patrie,
    Le jour de gloire est arrive !
    Contre nous de la tyrannie,
    L’etendard sanglant est leve !

    Aux armes, citoyens !

    • BATAVIER

      yes and lets storm the bastille hehe a viking with french roots??

      • Guest

        Yes you call them Normand and Breton!

        Not to worry anyone but I saw some of them bringing down the guillotine from the Attics.

  • Pingback: #iMAPAS Bitelia: Productoras piden a ISPs, Google y Yahoo que retiren sitios de streaming infractor — #iMAPAS

  • Goodbyenoway

    First thing, kill all the lawyers. That would take care of 90% of this mess.

  • Pingback: Productoras piden a ISPs, Google y Yahoo que retiren sitios de streaming infractor - La Isla Buscada

  • http://prowest.ua prowest

    Don’t forget all the requests western governments have made for them to remove protest videos. And local police requests to remove police abuse videos.

    Difference is, government has guns and can make you take down the videos, music companies and movie companies cannot.

    • Predator

      Bad news:

      We have guns too.

    • Viking

      Yes, governments have guns. But people have votes, don’t they? And btw even guns wont save corrupt and despotic governments. Arab Spring anyone?
      We are the 99% , remember !

      • Guest

        Votes does not count right now since the gov has been taken away by the corporation.

  • Guest

    The corporate parasites are on their way to control the mainstream internet causing incalculable economic damages, forcing the people to look elsewhere for networking, unless. . .

    Unless we kill them all!

  • Pingback: makin257 - Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site Blocking Demand

  • Blu Ray Players

    Best Streaming Media Players

    I love this post my friend.The information that you have provided in your post Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site Blocking Demand
    is really helpful.It is one of the best post I have ever read about. I have found out some similar useful information here http://www.streamingmediaplayerreviews.com/category/best-streaming-media-players/.

    Best Streaming Media Players

  • Pingback: Organizações francesas pedem na Justiça bloqueio de sites de streaming | F2 - Sistemas

  • Pingback: PRODUCTORAS PIDEN A ISPs, GOOGLE Y YAHOO QUE RETIREN SITIOS DE STREAMING INFRACTOR « Informática y Móviles

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Muhammad-Omer/100000571636230 Muhammad Omer

    pakistafashion
    Regards,
    MUHAMMAD OMER-24389

  • Anonymous
  • Pingback: Notrackingme | Proxy » Blog Archiv » Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site Blocking Demand

  • Matt

    In order for “copyright trolls” to log IP address, they must join the swarm and therefor participate in the illegal distribution of their agents work. If the copyright holder is therefore participating in the “pirating” of the copyrighted work, the public should be able to assume the copyright is waived and sharing is encouraged by the copyright holder.

  • Pingback: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, ISPs, All Served With Streaming Site Blocking Demand | Droid Universe

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.