TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

How Adobe DRM Requires People to Pirate Library Books

drmIn case you missed it, March 28th was Document Freedom day.

The goal of the day was to spread awareness about the increasing need to adopt an open standard for public as well and privately held documents. The e-book industry is one which is in dire need of such a standard. Currently, ebooks are often protected with DRM, which has become famous for causing problems for the customers who pay for those ebooks.

Actor, writer and the recent hero to a Hobbit themed pub, Stephen Fry, is quoted at the Document Freedom Day website saying, “Open standards make sense. What makes no sense is that large companies in the field still do not understand this. It is time once and for all to end the pointless nonsense of one document sent on one platform being incomprehensible to the user of another.”

Having purchased a Nook Tablet a few days prior, the timing of this awareness day was quite relevant to my current interests. Since freshly rooting my tablet, my attention has been very much oriented on acquiring new e-books and reading the old e-books that had been getting stale on my PC.

Luckily many libraries are now offering a service for “loaning” ebooks. So I can easily borrow e-books to read on my new device, right? Wrong. Very wrong.

It turns out that a majority of the 6,495 titles available at my local library were accessible only through a locked .acsm file format. The open alternative had 49 titles available at the time. That is about as many as fit on just one of the small book shelves I’m sitting near as I type this.

What is a .acsm file anyway? If you understand how a .torrent file works you can think of a .acsm file as being very much like a .torrent file. If you use Windows or Mac, you can (theoretically) download and install Adobe Digital Editions (ADE). This software reads the .acsm file and then it will download the actual .epub book, complete with DRM. With me so far?

Before the .acsm file downloads the e-book (which you either paid for or used your library card to borrow against your good name) you must create an account with Adobe and log in. The stated reason had something to do with your assumed guilt should anything you download escape into the open internet. At which point, the copyright owner of the content will hunt you down and take severe legal action. But wait, there’s more!

Say you have a device you wish to read your e-book on. ADE must to connect to and authorize your device and handle transferring the book to that device. What happens if it failed to recognize your device? What happens if any step along the way fails? If Adobe has their way, you are out of luck.

Keep in mind that “device” includes the computer you are running ADE on. So what happens when you use a linux based operating system that ADE does not support? Then you are stuck with a useless .acsm file and can not download the actual content you either borrowed or paid for.

It requires a lot of tedious steps to access content that should normally be very simple to access. In the end, the only civilized way to access the content is to, remove the DRM. In other words, there is no legal way to access the content without breaking the law if you are using free (libre) software.

According to Adobe’s licensing terms, moving the e-book from one device to another is not acceptable unless Adobe authorizes each device. Not that they are offering you an opportunity to obey the law of Adobe. Go ahead and try opening a DRM e-book in an e-book reader or on a device that isn’t made by Adobe and the extent of your reading with be a short error saying the user is not activated.

Should you manage to find a way to run ADE on a linux based operating system, the software still doesn’t want to connect to other devices, such as an e-book reader. Without authorization, you have three options including not reading the book you borrowed (meanwhile, nobody else can borrow that title from your library for 14 days), you may break the DRM using available scripts for doing so or you can download a DRM free pirated version.

Oddly, downloading a pirated version does not seem to make the reader vulnerable to the same severe legal risks as breaking DRM does. Between that and being held accountable for any copy that may be made from your DRM laden e-book, downloading a pirated copy seems to be the ‘most legal’ method of accessing a given book in a situation where there is a sever lack of clear legal options.

“We are committed to providing easy access to books and information for all ages, through responsive professionals, engaging programs, and state-of-the-art technology in a safe and friendly environment.” says my local library

After inquiring with a few of the staff members, it was uncovered that the option of whether or not to provide ebooks in an open or closed format to the library is left up to the publishers. Should community libraries committed to providing easy access to books then accept into their system a format dedicated to making access as difficult as possible?

Ryan Smith, aka Green Pirate.

This post is from the News Bits section of TorrentFreak where we present stories from around the web in a concise summary format. Full TorrentFreak articles can be found here. If you have a tip please let us know. News Bits have their very own RSS feed
  • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

    Do libraries still take donations? If they take donations of physical books, maybe they’ll take ebook copies that I have laboriously stripped the DRM from for my own personal use. (perfectly legal, at least right now, in the country I’m in.) Then everyone can share from east to use public donations…

  • Bass264

    It’s really stupid on te companies part to think they’re going to stop piracy by doing this. They’re screwing over customers that actually PAY for the content.

  • K.C.

    It’s the same thing as with original DVDs/Blu-rays, where you have to watch anti-piracy warnings and trailers for minutes (without being able to skip them) before you finally get to watch the movie you bought.
    The industry is so fucking stupid and then they wonder why people download pirated stuff.

    • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

      It’s more like if the original Blu-Rays/DVDs anti-piracy warnings could prevent you from watching your movie on certain DVD players or your computer.

      Actually, it’s exactly like when they started this whole DRM bullshit in 1999/2000 and certain CDs wouldn’t play on your PC.

      • Anyone

        Blurays/DVDs have the region bullshit on it
        so yes, they won’t play on certain players

    • Anonymous

      I totally agree with you! We have such a bunch of original DVD/BD that we have almost nowhere to store them. Yet every single time I have to see the anti piracy warning and a bunch of trailers.
      I paid money to watch the fucking movie a not that load of crap! Also, I have been recently thinking to move to an other continent (seriously, no BS)… which would practically disable all my console games unless I carry my consoles with me. Fucking ridiculous! I paid for this stuff!
      After the MU take down I swore never to purchase anything from the MAFIAA, despite the fact that I have NEVER downloaded anything illegal from MU.

      • Kadai

        That is because this industry lives from the people that has to brought the stuff not only once, but twice and even more times.

        Lit. pay for it whenever the corporations feel like it.

        If they did not forced people to make the change from Beta to VHS to DVD, they will not be the empire they are nowdays. Its alla bout to make people pay much more to get again for what they have paid, or do not get it at all.

  • http://twitter.com/thDigitalReader Nate the great

    This article feels like FUD.

    Tell me, are you this Ryan Smith?
    https://twitter.com/#!/RnFnSmith/

    If so, your local library uses OverDrive. They have provided apps to read library ebooks. Why haven’t you installed the Android app on your rooted Nook Tablet?

    If you don’t like the app, try Bluefire Reader. It works just fine for reading library ebooks.

    • Merpina

      I don’t read FUD from this. It simply shows a flaw in the system. What I read is that 6,446 titles at the public library are unavailable to the average Linux user, all because of proprietary limitations. Change the e-books to open document format and you are left with easy-to-access data, which is the whole point of the library, isn’t it?

      • http://twitter.com/thDigitalReader Nate the great

        You cannot reasonably expect a company to support all platforms; it’s just not feasible.

        • JOTUNN

          Oh really? Because last time I checked, that’s what everyone else does… all the time. That’s how “Being a developer” works.

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/H2TST2T375OWGBJT6TM24NAWEY Stephen

          Windows, Mac, Linux. There you go. 99.9% of people use one of these three.

          You cant use anything that uses DRM on linux. Ill have to go out and purchase a $400 OS, so I can watch fucking nextflix.

          If your company can not provide an option for 3 operating systems, then you’re company is shit. There are no two ways about it.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002639684444 Ryan Smith

      Some people simply don’t want to root their $200 device and void their warranty just to do what the device is designed to do. There is no solution for the legitimate customer who does not wish to break DRM or void their warranty by rooting.

      These apps are not available for the Nook. Does it benefit anyone to mandate the use of third parties in a two party transaction? It benefits the third party (Adobe, OverDrive, Bluefire) at the expense of the better interest of the user and library.

      The twitter account above is not very active, but if you are interested in following me you can do so here: https://twitter.com/#!/GreenPirate_org

      Thanks for the comments!

      • http://twitter.com/thDigitalReader Nate the great

        First, OverDrive isn’t a third party to this transaction; they’re the ones you’re getting the ebook from. It’s OD’s servers, not the library’s, that do all the heavy lifting. Second, they have to be involved with the DRM because publishers require it.

        As for the NT not being supported, that is the fault of B&N, not Adobe, OD, or your library. B&N has been sitting on an OD app for the Nook Tablet for a little while.

        And thanks for confirming you are you. It changes this story from “libraries driving users to piracy” to “OD doesn’t support _my_ chosen platform”. There’s a huge difference between the 2.

        I was right. This post is FUD.

        • http://twitter.com/GarethThomas Gareth Thomas

          Incorrect, the article is valid. The point is that there should be a single e-book format, not 4/5 with DRM that is platform specific.

          If there was one format, “_my_ chosen platform” would not be a problem as all platforms would be built to support the single format.

          DRM is an issue on non-Windows machines and until recently Mac ones to. Linux support is almost never provided.

          As a Web Developer (and as another user pointed out) I have to support IE6/7/8/9 Firefox 3.6-latest, Safari (various) and Chrome (various) with Javascript on and off. I work for a small company with 3 developers, and your argument is Adobe who had a revenue of over $1billion last year cannot support Windows, Mac and Linux?

          You argument is weak at best.

        • Merpina

          I completely agree with Gareth. You missed the original point, which is the importance of open document formatting, especially in regards to the public library.

          I’ll break it down, Open Document Formatting = GOOD! Making users comply with your weak, unsupported, proprietary, DRM software = BAD!

  • Stephen Fry

    Cool, you quoted Stephen Fry when eariler today I listened to him say that exact same speech. Small world <3

  • Pingback: How Adobe DRM Requires People to Pirate Library Books | U Torrent Free Download

  • Guest

    The problem is that these businesses are run by lawyers and bean counters, for the sole short term benefit of old fat cats. They don’t understand entreprise or innovation, they believe they are entitiled to legal rents to force you to work as a slave for their only benefit.

    In the end, you really realize that the only positive outcome will be when customers, instead of being obedient, will take those drm, and stick it far up the arse of those old lazy and incompetent bitches.

  • Anonymous

    lol, OK thats pretty funny when you think about it dude. Wow.
    Anon-Nets.tk

  • Tim Holloway

    The really sad thing is that since the library system “buys” the eBooks, rather than, say, a license from the publisher or a clearinghouse, the county has about 1 copy of each book and that’s it. The wait times are totally unrealistic. It’s easier and faster to drive down and check out the dead tree version.

    And in the case of Harper Collins, even “buying” an ebook doesn’t count for much, since they want the bits to “wear out” after the book has been read 20 times or so.

    I tried the Adobe DRM route. It blew all to hell when I did system maintenance. I deleted the app and go elsewhere for my reading now. Why put up with that sort of [censored] just to queue up for the one and only copy of Game of Thrones?

  • http://twitter.com/icanhazsake Ninja

    I’d just buy the original and download the pirate like I often do. But then again lately I’ve been thinking about it and I’ll just do it for soft DRM, stuff like Adobe should just be avoided (as in don’t buy) because if you buy it you’ll be sponsoring more stupid DRM. Srsly.

  • Mwhahaha

    Ebooks will kill the literary market.

    Everything else on this subject is just so much fluff.

  • Pingback: How Adobe DRM Requires People to Pirate Library Books › edv-service-bamberg.de

  • Mudkipz

    .acsm is just .scam jumbled up.

  • Pingback: MakinMo's Tech Blog

  • MadAsASnake

    The whole concept of “borrowing” an eBook is just so completely wrongheaded in the first place. You borrow a normal book as that is the natural way to do it. You read it, you gie it back. With an eBook, the idea that another library user can’t “borrow” it (read copy the bits) at the same time is staggeringly stupid. It’s like any e-Seller saying there are limited copies… All they acheive is to limit distribution.

    • library luci

      Of course they limit distribution. Otherwise, how would the publisher/author/distributor make any money? The library has to pay for the eBook, but only initially. When the library buys a paper book, it is estimated to last for 20 checkouts before needing to be replaced. The library then buys another book to replace the worn and torn copy. They do the same thing with e-books, even though there is no physical wear and tear, to ensure a continued market for those who make the thing in the first place. Authors spend as much time writing an “eBook” as a paper book, they need their royalties somehow. I guess the alternative would be to charge an inordinate amount from the beginning and allow as many check-outs as possible, but then the library couldn’t do what it does now with its paper books — replace fewer copies as popular bestsellers become less popular over time.

  • Pingback: Links – New and Old Censorship, Anti-trust, Privacy Violations and Pollution. | Techrights

  • Pingback: Lastest Epub Drm News | Perfect Webs Ebooks

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.