TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Kim Dotcom: MPAA / RIAA Corrupted the U.S. Government

In a submission to the U.S. Copyright Tzar the MPAA and RIAA characterized Kim Dotcom and his colleagues as manipulative, “wealthy and arrogant.” According to the MegaUpload founder this language is a sign of weakness. “There is no need to sway public opinion because everyone can see how the MPAA and RIAA are corrupting the system by infiltrating their own people into key government positions,” he says.

dotcomLast Friday the MPAA and RIAA filed a joint submission with Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator Victoria Espinel.

The two groups gave their recommendations for future IP enforcement policy and among other suggestions offered to help out with future international actions against “rogue sites” such as Megaupload.

“In this case, the Justice Department and other federal agencies are now grappling with a set of wealthy and arrogant defendants who are leaving no stone unturned in their efforts to sway public opinion against efforts to hold them accountable,” the groups wrote.

An interesting choice of words.

Ignoring whether or not the statements apply to Dotcom or not, being “wealthy and arrogant” is by no means a crime. In fact, many people in Hollywood and the music business can easily be described using the same terms. In addition, “swaying public opinion” is one of the main goals of both the MPAA and RIAA.

In a response to the name-calling, Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom says the insults are a sign of weakness. According to him there is absolutely no need to “sway anything.”

“They are calling me names because the case against Megaupload is a stillborn cripple,” Dotcom told TorrentFreak.

“There is no need to sway public opinion because everyone can see how the MPAA and RIAA are corrupting the system by infiltrating their own people into key government positions. They are openly paying politicians and hiring public officials who are favorable to them.”

Dotcom is referring to the so-called “revolving door” between the U.S. Government and the copyright industries. As a result, the MPAA and the U.S. authorities prosecuting Megaupload can be considered a close group of friends.

“A recent example is the senior vice president of the MPAA Marc Miller who recently called me a ‘career criminal’ at a press briefing regarding the potential dismissal of the Megaupload case,” Dotcom says.

“He is a former prosecutor and colleague of Jay Prabhu, one of the US Attorneys behind the prosecution of Megaupload. They worked together in the Computer Crime division at the Department of Justice and they jointly won the Anti-Piracy Leadership Award from the SIIA.”

“Good friends help each other,” Dotcom adds.

One of the most crucial employees at the MPAA is its CEO Chris Dodd, who joined the movie industry group in 2011 after serving as a senator for thirty years.

“The MPAA made the ultimate hire with former Senator and Joe Biden’s best friend Chris Dodd. They now own the ear drums at the White House. And Chris Dodd is using his influence,” Dotcom says.

“The US Attorney [Neil MacBride] leading this case was a former copyright lobbyist and lawyer of Joe Biden. He is also a buddy of Chris Dodd. This gang of friends plotted the takedown of Megaupload in bad faith,” Dotcom adds.

As mentioned before, Kim Dotcom and his legal team claim to have evidence that vice president Joe Biden was the one who ordered the shutdown of Megaupload. According to Dotcom the vice president admitted this in public.

“At a recent fundraiser luncheon Joe Biden openly admitted and bragged that he was behind the Megaupload termination. And that he had to convince Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to back him and Chris Dodd. We have a credible witness who has provided our legal team with evidence.”

Dotcom is convinced that Biden is the mastermind, and that people such as assistant U.S. attorney Jay Prabhu are nothing more than foot soldiers waiting in line to walk through the revolving door.

“Who believes that Jay Prabhu, a semi-talented assistant US Attorney with little respect inside the DOJ has the balls to take down a global cloud storage business with millions of legitimate users and 4% of all Internet traffic? He is just a soldier following orders.”

“And when the Megaupload case finally arrives at the bullshit graveyard Jay Prabhu might get a job at the MPAA just like his former colleague Marc Miller. That is, if the MPAA still exists after Megaupload, it’s business partners and our users sue them and the studios for damages.”

While the entertainment industry and the U.S. Government succeeded in taking Megaupload out, at least temporarily, Dotcom believes that the truth will come out in the end.

“The evidence of corruption is surfacing thanks to whistleblowers. This time they went too far and it’s going to bite them where it hurts,” Dotcom says.

“We are innocent. We can prove it. The legal experts are siding with us. We are winning important court battles. And we have the people of the Internet on our side. The public and the media are becoming more interested in this case, making it increasingly difficult for the US government to get away with lies and dirty tricks.”

Megaupload’s founder already scored a victory in New Zealand, and he believes that more will follow.

“Independent New Zealand judges see right through the politically motivated maliciousness of this case and won’t become an accessory after the fact for big content billionaires in the US,” he says.

According to Dotcom the public has an important role to play in turning this case in favor of Megaupload. Voting Obama out of office is a good start, as he is in the pockets of the MPAA and RIAA.

“Remember the Mr President song? ‘Don’t let them get away with that’. You can start by voting for a new administration in November if Obama isn’t turning this around. Hollywood and the MPAA are only backing Obama’s re-election and can’t expect any favors from Mitt Romney. Romney is simply the better bet for a free Internet.

“You have the power to send a strong message to the next President of the United States. Get involved. Tell your friends. Blog and tweet. Take your Internet back while you still can,” Dotcom concludes.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Adehg2

    Obama, Romney or any other puppe. They all have the same agenda.

    • Adehg2

       *puppet

      • Luke Solis

        theres an edit button for a reason :P

        • Techanon

          anons can’t see edit buttons :P

      • guest

        I liked puppy better.

    • ANo

      $3.2 Billion in lobbying last year.
      Fuck knows how much the revolving door gets them.
      Campaign contributions are sure to be in Billions in election year.

      They work, only the people who pay them.
      http://www.opensecrets.org for the numbers.

      • Seadevil

         only way to counter them is : DON’T BUY MUSIC….DON’T BUY VIDEO.
        then they’ll stop and listen to the public opinion.

        • Anyone

          but try to support artists with no MAFIAA ties

        • Shitforbrains

          Then you will have nithing to steal you dumb theiving fuck

        • Baba

          Shitforbrains, you make the assumption that the MPAA and friends own and control all entertainment. That is what they think and that is what you think but you are both wrong. If we stop buying their junk then there will NOT be nothing left… there are plenty of people willing to step in who are not there just for the money. Ok sure you might not get a movie where the main star gets paid more in a month than I would earn in 10 lifetimes but us humans will always find a way to entertain ourselves.

        • Guest

          . . .Drop your cable/satellite/mp radio subscription and don’t go to the movie theater.   That might save the live of many of these movies executives.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Freemon-Sandlewould/100003255271533 Freemon Sandlewould

          Right on!

      • robthom

        And thats exactly where your money goes when you buy content “legally”!

        A smidge, maybe 3% goes to the artists.

    • Nathan Pierce

       Gary Johnson is pretty bad ass, just saying.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Freemon-Sandlewould/100003255271533 Freemon Sandlewould

        Gary Johnson is not going to win.  Don’t waste your vote.

        What we need to do is never reelect anyone.  Cycle the people through before they can form ties like Joe Biden.  Hollywood will get tired of buying votes every time the position turns over. And alot of people will just listen then go public.

        ReElect NO ONE.  Out with Obamao.

    • anon

      Obama is the entertainment industry big friend.
      When there were GOP Debates around December/January, a question about SOPA came out. When the speaker said “Warner Bros” “Disney” etc etc, the public booooooed like hell !

      Thats a fact ! Republican just CANT STAND HOLLYWOOD !!
      You can say everything you want about Romney accepting money from lobby etc etc and that Dems and Reps are the same, but it’s simply a fact ! With Obama out, Hollywood will have LESS power in Washington !

      And honestly, just look at the two campains. Obama is spending his time telling the whole world how bad and devil Romney is !
      He’s saying that being rich like Romney is being against the middle class and some shit, while the Romney’s campain talks about real economic problems, balance the budget etc etc…

      Ok, im not here to talk about all politics problems but, it’s sad to say that during the Bush years, the internet was less attacked than it is actually !!!
      So wake up !!
      I dont really want to vote for Romney, but I want to vote OUT Obama !!
      Fuck Hollybamawood !

      • Anyone

        I’m sure republicans love money more than they hate hollywood
        once the bribes start rolling in they will take them

        Obama is still the lesser evil overall

        • Lib

          I’ll say we’ll vote Obamatherfucker out first regardless what’s the outcome. We don’t know what’s up in Romney’s mind yet but at least we still stand a chance. And we’ll see…

        • JohnGaspardo

          voting for either is still like driving off a cliff the difference is with robme it’s like going off at a 100mph and with obroke we are only doing a mere 97mph. the end result is the same. we crash at the bottom of every cliff time for a revolution  

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Freemon-Sandlewould/100003255271533 Freemon Sandlewould

          You make me laugh.  Obama is the worst of all evils.  He is a hateful man.

        • WasterOfTime

          Didn’t think Romney would come off as the lesser evil; but he’s still an evil.

          Personally, I want to see an independent win for once, or at least yield a surprisingly high support number never seen publicly. Something in the double-digits at least. Have fun explaining that turn of events CNN, FOX, and NBC.

          Fuck Alien or Predator, we need a Browncoat in office.

      • Zanz

         so lamar smith is not a republican and dose not sway his caucus to support his BS.  what i see is that he is wanting all things monitored for infringement and easy ways to block sites/ip ranges to stop piracy, then when that failed he changed infringement to child porn and put it up again.  if anything the republicans are more for helping the mpaa/riaa they just try to not talk about it.

      • Change

         republican or democrat ….two sides of the same coin   ….obama or romney they are one in the same …just another paid off “american offical”

      • Chuck

        Yeah I hear ya on some of your points but like a true Republican you ignore the other obvious facts. I am not happy with Obama by any means and I am an independent but seriously voting for Mitt Romney is like voting to go back to the 1950′s. Please do some research sir…please.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Freemon-Sandlewould/100003255271533 Freemon Sandlewould

          Going back to the 50′s??? You mean as in being able to get a job?

          Sounds pretty good.  How do we pull off this time travel you propose?

          Any body but Obamao.  ReElect NO ONE.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/6QO6MSZT7EYQLUT4TCXAZSEHSY Cinnamint

      False equivalence. But, not by much.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Don-Dilly/1624894683 Don Dilly

       Not exactly true.
      Other than Arnie (and just as famously John Wayne and Charlton Heston) , the media industries and their associated ‘luvvies’ (ie the publlic faces) are seen asleftleaning democrats and traditionally that is where their money is pumped. Thats not to say that when they are faced with a Republican government they dont still pump millions into lobbying and bribery. Its just that the price is higher to buy a republican.

      Traditionally the Republicans are bribed by oil  and Aerospace/Defence companies which is why they are always up for war and not just using military action as a means of protecting US oil interests but also more damningly to manipulate market prices (to maximise profits).

      Where both democrats and Republicans converge is that they claim to be acting in the name of exporting freedom of association and free speech yet curtail both  (pull up some of Hilary Clintons farcical speeches on protecting a free internet).

      Obama on the other hand has come unstuck on two counts. First he hasnt had the backbone to pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq and secondly, his MAFIAA originated policies affecting the Internet are rapidly alienating him from his own electorate

    • http://torrentfreak.com/ Rob8urcakes

      Fuck Obama, fuck Romney, and fuck all the other bribed and corrupt muppets in the 2 major political parties.

      It’s time to wise-up folks, and it’s so damned easy to do.  You start by visiting the United States’ Pirate Party here -
      http://us.pirate.is/

      Then you join up and start voting for your local Pirate Party candidates.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/WKMD6PE4FQVFYTN3A4NVVP5PAY Dylan

      *false flag fear mongerer terrorists deserve to be the ones in jail

    • Guest

      Neil MacBride, Joe Biden an Chris Dodd are playing with fire.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nick-Warner/620045191 Nick Warner

      Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Freemon-Sandlewould/100003255271533 Freemon Sandlewould

      Anybody but Dear Leader Obamao.

      ANYBODY….and that happens to be Mitt Romney.

    • Guest

      like…

      what does obama/romney have to do with this?
      i though that the article said that biden convinced obama to go along with it…  why aren’t you bitching about biden?

      and seriously…
      even though biden is undoubtedly corrupt, 
      I’ll keep him over that ryan guy, any day.  holy smokes

  • Fuckthefeds

    First

    • Der

       Second!

    • MrBonobo

       Loser!

      • Luke Solis

        Jumping on the fail boat! TOOT TOOT!

  • Gear Mentation

    Dotcom should really think of some other way to win this than voting Obama out of office.  I doubt most people are single-issue voters on this.  It would be better to shame the administration into reversing itself. Perhaps, being rich, he likes Romney, but it makes him look petty.

    • Tubal22

      I think he’s just saying Obama is corrupt to the core and runs the office of the President via political backscratching and IOUs..

      He thinks he might have a better shot with someone else who might actually let this thing work itself out in the courts instead of pinging through a network of politicians who are friendly with Hollywood and the MPAA/RIAA.

      • Gear Mentation

         Trading one corrupt administration for one which would make it look ethical isn’t the answer though.

        • Zzzzz

           Absolutely and Dotcom wanting the likes of Romney and Ryan to win the American presidency with all the damage they will do has turned me against him.
          He would be quite happy for the middle classes to be gutted for the benefit of millionaires just to suit himself.
          Fucking rich people, they’re all the same, selfish and truly out of touch.

        • Zzzzz

           Just to add, I’m no huge Obama supporter but anyone willing to have the Ryan budget implemented on the whole of America just for personal gain is a fucking asshole,

      • B2

        Nah, Kim’s just using what power he has available to him to hit back where he can.  He knows he has a fair few supporters here, and online in general, and so is trying to swing that support against the Obama administration by attempting to persuade his followers to switch their votes over to the opposition as he knows that, in sufficient numbers, that would hurt them.  TorrentFreak here is an important mouthpiece for Kim, working in his interest, as he knows his message will travel well.

        I don’t blame Kim for acting in this way, but many of the moves he makes are quite apparent.

    • Demonoid2012

      Pretty much.

    • Truec

      Perhaps, being a successful businessman, he likes Romney.

      I don’t think he’s seriously trying to say that Obama should be voted out because of Megaupload, but that the Megaupload scandal stands as an example of why Obama shouldn’t be president.

    • Rekrul

       Yes, a better reason to vote Obama out is that he’s broken nearly all his campaign promises.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        Uh, what? No, he hasn’t broken any promises, he has been forced to break them by Rethuglican intransigence.

        • Guest

          He hasn’t been forced to break them by the Republicans, he willfully broke them and blamed it on the Republicans just like how Republican presidents willfully break their campaign promises and blame it on the Democrats.

          Every dick-move you make is always the other guy’s fault. Always. That’s how the political game is played. 

      • Shogunreaper

        Maybe so, but a better reason to keep him in is that romney would make a horrible president.

        • Gear Mentation

          Agreed, he has been forced to break promises, and Romney would be horrible.  But maybe Romney would be just the Ayn Randian wakeup call the country needs.  It would be the end of the Republicans for a generation.

        • Guest

           Honestly I think either way the US is fucked. Obama and Romney both are horrible. If anyone payed close attention to what Obama has or hasn’t done these past years as well as what Romney has done and where they get their money from you can see what I mean. Nowadays the only real difference after a candidate is voted in is the party name.

        • Anyone

          and skin color

      • POKE

        10  Every four years you dicks do the same thing.

        20  You never learn.

        30  GOTO 10

        • PEEK

           5 REM “LEARN BASIC ASSWIPE”

  • LiveFreely

     While I would like to see this case thrown out of court and perhaps some successful counter-suits, I find it very hard to believe that Romney would be any better for internet freedom than Obama.

    • Tubal22

      He probably would for a while.  Before he gets too many friends in Washington.

      • LiveFreely

         Do we have a specific reason to believe he would be?

        • Tubal22

          Not particularly, but we’re quite certain that Obama is in their pockets.  

          Uncertainty is better than certainty.

        • Abunchofgibberish

          Romney’s too busy worrying about whether or not two dudes are kissing somewhere to care about people downloading iPods on their Internet Highway.

          This stuff won’t matter to him until he’s been in office for a year or so and started seeing how much money is in agreeing with these lobby groups.

      • Quadrupel

        If you think a conservative Mormon republican is going to stand up for internet freedom and against corporate hegemony, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

    • Esn

      Maybe the point is to pretend that Romney is better, and hope that one of the two candidates decides to believe the bluff and actually take the internet freedom position.

      It’s true: both candidates are on the same side, so far. They can avoid having this debate, like they’ve been avoiding so many other debates, by colluding to be on the same side so that opponents have nobody to vote for. The only hope is to convince one or the other that this issue can actually get crucial votes without losing them crucial donations from wealthy donors.

      Long term, the real battle not in politics, but it’s to convince the wealthy in America that a free internet will make them richer. To quote Martin Gilens’ Oxford study from 2005, “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness”: “when Americans with different income levels differ in their policy
      preferences, actual policy outcomes strongly reflect the preferences of
      the most affluent but bear virtually no relationship to the preferences
      of poor or middle-income Americans.” 

      Battling things out in the public political arena is a loser’s game. The real battle is to convince the plutocrats.

  • Luke Solis

    god. i don’t trust Romney… do we have to vote him in?

    • Truec

      Why do you not trust Romney?  He hasn’t done anything to prove himself less trustworthy than the guy we already voted in.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZ5BM5GNLA54OADSWGSXAMA7SY Jay

        He lies about everything and he’s been on every side of a debate since 2002.

        • Abunchofgibberish

          How is this any different from what Obama is doing?

        • Guest

           true but so did Obama and honestly the thing I hate most is many people don’t realize that this “change” he brought us was either no change or for the worst.

      • teenygozer

        Yeah, no.  Are you possibly from another planet, or are you joking here?

        He was my governor when I lived in MA. He is terrifyingly, horrifically untrustworthy.  He will literally say anything, ANYTHING, to get elected, then he will smile as he says the exact opposite to another group of people.  Then he screws both parties over, lining his and his friends’ pockets via some finely-crafted laws that benefit the top .001% of the richest rich in our country.  His obvious disdain for anyone who isn’t rich is breathtaking to behold, he can’t seem to get a sentence out without showing it.  He’s a corporatist through and through.  The only reason he isn’t overtly on board with the RIAA and MPAA is because he doesn’t need their money.  He can buy & sell them.

        Both he and Obama have a lockdown on the press: journalists are not allowed to quote anyone in the administration or on either election committee or either candidate’s families without the article being thoroughly vetted by either candidate’s people first. The press knuckled under… they’ve been transformed into PR machines for the candidates.  Our choice for president is, as ever, bad and worse.

        • Guest

           I agree! I almost feel like voting for that 3rd party option bc of this

        • Guest321

          Why can’t the US get a pirate party started? Then ya all will have someone to vote for.

      • LiveFreely

         Not being less trustworthy than the other guy does not make one trustworthy.

      • miz

         Because Ron Paul has not been consistent and easily influenced, unlike Ron Paul, who in addition has consistently preserved some very strong values and morals behind the very reason why he would be a signifcantly valuable/essential president to improve humanity and the world we live in.

        • miz

           ACK!!! Ron Paul HAS been consistent.
          I meant to say that Mitt Romney HAS NOT been consistent.

        • ftfy

          Because Ron Paul has not been consistent and easily influenced, unlike Mitt Romney, who in addition has consistently preserved some very strong
          values and morals behind the very reason why he would be a signifcantly valuable/essential president to improve humanity and the world we live
          in.

        • ftfm

          Because Ron Paul has not been consistent and easily influenced, unlike Mitt Romney, who in addition has consistently preserved some very strong values and morals behind the very reason why he would be a signifcantly valuable/essential president to improve humanity and the world we live in.

      • Luke Solis

        I know I have nothing to go on such as facts or past history but Its one of them gut feelings. everything about this guy just screams red flags from left, right and center. Besides. what would happen if we have another R president? well congress would pass more bills, which is a good idea, right? well.. not until congress passes something that doesn’t reflect the public’s views. which I have a feeling Romny will allow…. a lot. it doesn’t help that my state’s Governor got big balls and removed union bargaining rights, which is a big “accomplishment”. but how much farther would Romny go? the way i see it, as far as he wants to because that’s what the people voted him in for.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/TUJAFTA65IJSCOOTBRGQEHJUZQ David

      Yep’ Romney seems to be a huge asshole, but he’s also the best and most likely the last change for the US.

      And I can remember that someone pledged to “cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office,” “lift two million Americans from poverty,” and “jolt our economy back to life” while people shouted “Freedom”.
       While during these years the economy and freedom have been sodomized or something by the big guys,, 

      • Luke Solis

        yeah. but every politician will say stuff like that. till they realize how much power they really have once in office. It seems like everyone uses this excuse regardless of who is in office. 
        I feel like the people of this nation are blinded by the fact that a president will do the things he said and not realize that there are limits of what he really could do.

    • miz

      Check out Ron Paul?

      • Anyone

        unvoteable jesusfreak

        • miz

          source?

        • TampaMagic

           Uk support for ron paul,  as im pretty damn sure that both your country and a few others are fucked if the current people in power are allowed to stay in power

          Goodluck liberty camp

  • Water is cool

    In other news; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBWQHYO2BpI&feature=player_embedded
    Malaysia is currently doing it’s own SOPA-like blackout – it’s SOPA-like bill has already been past but now they are protesting against it.

    I’m suprised they haven’t recieved any TF attension – it’s been reported on other news sites.

    • Guest321

      TF doesn’t care about Asian countries me thinks.

    • ScrewEwe2

      makes me want to get on a Malaysian proxy and say some defamatory things about their King, Almu’tasimu Billahi Muhibbuddin Tuanku Alhaj Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah Ibni Almarhum Sultan Badlishah of Kedah. Hope the guy never gets pulled over for drunk driving cuz that’s a long assed name to remember if the cops ask what his name is.

  • Demonoid2012

    He should’ve left the Obama part out. I don’t know why he had to even go there.  Lol…

  • foff

    Yeah come back megaupload.  Double fuck you Chris Dodd.  It is quite obvious the Riaa is heavily influencing the government to push their agenda.  I see no efforts from anyone saying may be we ought rethink copyright in this technology age.  With instant distribution, copyrights of almost 100 years are immoral.  Even patents only last 17 years.  They need to be rolled way back.  In addition the content industry needs to be forced to make all their content available online  or lose any claim.  Not only that regulators need to force the content industry to to relinquish the retail monopoly.  Any tom dick and harry and sally site ought to be able to sell mp3 or flac or any quality of music and movie download without onerous contracts.  Why should a few big sites only be allowed to sell downloads?  Getting back to the point, why has the copyright industry quashed the any voice that attacks their monopoly no matter how sensible it might be?  I still don’t understand why the industry was allowed to practically kill the internet radio industry by convincing the ftc to set ridiculous rates for streaming.  What good did that do anyone?  We lost the potential to have thousands and thousands of specialized music stations.  

    Hopefully sooner or later a lawmaker will see reason and stop blindly supporting the content industry.  There is zero evidence that all the content available on line has affected the content industry.  Billion dollar movies and billion dollar tv contracts for sports prove that there is still tons of money in the entertainment business and if anything the internet is improving their bottom line.  I maintain that if the Tv industry sold downloads of tv shows in high definition immediately after airing without commercials for a buck or two they would make four or five times what they are making in advertising.  Think of how many jobs would be saved because a show was not cancelled because the downloads alone justified the show.  Wouldn’t the industry be better if it did not entirely rely on advertisers?  

    If the industry was forced to stream all sports and regular shows for a reasonable amount think how much they would make.   Cable and networks my feel threatened but they could become wholesalers of the streams in their market.  The government needs to stop protecting the bundling monopoly and force the industry to giving us an al a carte option online.  

    Enough said , If industry would use technology instead of fight it they would make many many times more then they currently are.  For example, look at all the money they have made selling dvd’s and now blu-ray.  What if they had fought to ban this technology, look at all the billions they would not now have.

    • LiveFreely

       I “liked” your comment but…

      “Getting back to the point, why has the copyright industry quashed the
      any voice that attacks their monopoly no matter how sensible it might
      be?”

      …objection your honor…asked and answered.

    • Dwerk

      But people don’t change.  If you give them more power then they’ll just use it to screw you that much harder.

      They need bringing down, not up.

  • Steve Smith

    they were corrupt long before the riaa/mpaa.

    • Monster

       yep yep. thanks for saying it for me. lol

  • Anyone

    Romney has no spine, he will take whatever position suits him at the moment

    he is by no means the “lesser evil”

    • Monster

      This asshole dotcom has his own agenda just like all these politicians.

      I won’t be voting for either obama or romney.  

      • McCheezits

        But Kim Dotcom isn’t an asshole. He’s a coolguy who doesn’t afraid of anything.

        Jokes aside, all Kim Dotcom really did was offer filesharing services to the masses, just like other companies. I can’t think of any ‘secret agenda’ or anything malicious that Dotcom would employ.

      • Anyone

        of course he has his own agenda, he doesn’t want his legitimate business shut down by corrupt politicians

        and corrupt politicians not interfering in the internet is also what I want, so in this case our interests align.

        as for him being an “asshole”, I never met the guy, so I can’t comment, but in the interviews he sounds nice and reasonable

  • Godbless

    Godbless whistleblowers.  If we didn’t live in a corrupted world,  youd be getting the recognition you all deserve,  all i can do is say,  thankyou, and godbless you

    • LiveFreely

       Ahh but if we didn’t live in a corrupt world there would be no whistleblowers.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZ5BM5GNLA54OADSWGSXAMA7SY Jay

    Sorry Dotcom, but we have a problem here.   New Zealanders have a way to vote out people they don’t like.  The US has a two party system.  That two party, First Past the Post System ensures that there are ONLY two parties in most districts as they go into office.  If you want to see our two party system work, get money out of politics.  We know you don’t like Obama.  Hell, most of us technologists don’t like Obama (Victoria Espinel anyone?) but the fact remains that until corporations get hit with fines for corrupting politicians, you’re going to have to fight against the lesser of two evils and such is Obama at this current time.

    • guest

      Lesser of two evils is not Obama, my misguided friend.  The entertainment industry is super left.

      Obama is the greater of the two evils. However I say everyone votes for a third party.

      • Guest

         You are a complete and utter fool if you think Mitwit is not going to be even worse than Bush ever was.  Maybe you want to stop watching False Noise and listen to some truth  for a change.  Pull that head out of your ass while you’re at it.

        • No

          While I agree Obama is not the answer I also believe Romney will not help either. I believe with Soros on one side and Murdoch on the other that this is all a game to play at our emotions while they strip the country of its wealth. The powers that be keep making this nonsense of a 2 party system and everyone keeps lapping it up with a passion. This is a means to keep us divided so they can continue to have their way while we bicker about things that do not matter. As an example I highly suggest checking out the NDAA, ACTA, SOPA, PIPA, CISPA and other bills like them to see what is happening to this country behind the veil of “politics”. Seems to me that a vote for Republican or Democrat is a “wasted” vote.

      • Guest

        The Republicans super don’t give a shit how “left” the entertainment industry is. Their money is as green as anyone’s, so a Romney administration would push their agenda through just as willingly as Obama’s has.  

        The real solution to the problem is to KICK BOTH DEMS AND REPUBS RIGHT THE FUCK OUT OF POLITICS. 

        You vote for either of them, you’re throwing your vote away and condemning this country to 4 more years of the same. 

        • No

           ”fool” “nitwit” “False Noise” “Pull that head out of your ass”.
          Well spoken my friend.
          I can understand someone using the lesser of two evils approach to voting considering the drivel both sides put out. Your post is just more of the same and reminds me of…Fox News!

          Good Job!

        • Lethn

          For those who don’t know much, Ron Pauls delegates in the GOP have been repeatedly harassed and even kicked out by establishment Republicans because they hate what he has to say about the kind of actions they’re all taking.

  • Pingback: Torrent News » Kim Dotcom: MPAA / RIAA Corrupted the U.S. Government

  • McCheezits

    Tell me something I don’t know…

    • Ichi Wang

      I have crabs.

  • British Buccaneer

    I don’t live in a America, or know a whole lot about how it elects its president, but this 2 candidate restriction it seems to have looks like bullshit. Why can’t America vote for more than 2 people, I don’t get it? 

    Somebody correct me if I got something wrong…

    • Anyone

      there could be a theoretical 3rd guy (and there are more people than just those 2 actually running)

      but the problem is in the system, each state votes independently, and if you win the state you get ALL the “electors” (basically the people actually voting for the president, but they are bound by the result of the state that sent them there)

      so if you can’t get 50% of the votes in multiple states, you have no chance of winning

      • guest

        Technically, the state is not bound to vote for who ever the people do.

        We could easily see an election where the electorates go against the popular vote.

        But yes a third party is possible, however he would need a ton of money to get on every ballet.  Not to mention he would need mad exposure to get enough votes due to a large percentage of voting population unaware of anything other than who they are told to vote for.  I am looking at you college kids.

    • Sim Salabim

      We wish you were wrong. We’re hopelessly mired in a political system that is about as progressive as our people. A significant percentage of our citizens still believe in inanities like virgin birth and miracles, never mind all the additional inanites such as ‘the illuminati’,  ’new world order’, some paranoid nonsense about the ecumenical council and the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion.

      We celebrate stupidity.

  • Testies

    Vote ron paul

  • Violated0

    Hilary Clinton is sure losing my respect and after I hoped she would make President one day as well. Let us recall that little Hillary not so long ago gave two speeches on the importance of Internet freedom and the dangers of censorship.

    Liar, liar, panties on fire. Guess who is the head of State department who had their US Embassy in Madrid force on Spain their own SOPA-like law. That despite SOPA crashing in the US and locals in Spain were strongly opposed to this censorship law.

    Then now we hear she approved of the MegaUpload take-down where that is like burning down the public library system just because visitors were inserting some banned books into the shelves for others to enjoy. Books I will say the librarians were only happy to remove once they were pointed out. They did object to a stop and search procedure when intrusive and not required by law.

    Well this is your last chance Ms. Clinton so grow some balls and defend the Internet from such attacks and censorship or to Hell with you. She is sure to get booed off stage if she ever did such a speech again.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IZ5BM5GNLA54OADSWGSXAMA7SY Jay

      I think you’re underestimating what’s going on here.  The State Department doesn’t make policy.  With Biden above her, she has to tow the line.  It would be horrible protocol if she goes against Obama or Biden so even if she wanted to, she can’t go against what they would want.

      • LiveFreely

         She could, but then when she wants something they will be less likely to back her.

        • Guest

          It all comes down to politics and hiarchy in the office.

      • Violated0

        While she does have to obey the order of the President there is no reason why she cannot be publicly opposed to such censorship. As it stands now she says nice things but does bad things which is a trait of a liar.

        Maybe she should remember why censorship in the name of copyright is a State Department matter when other more repressive countries can use such censorship to filter out things like Democracy, Freedom and Justice all while labelling this under “tackling copyright infringement”. She once said that herself but here is the United States working hard on both the tools and the excuse to do just that.

    • the truth

      She was this way before now.  It was quite obvious she was anti freedom from the get go.  You see the big D next to her name that means they do not want freedom.

      Also the other guys with the giant R, they want to force religion down everyone’s throat, not any religion their religion.

      You have two options don’t vote or vote third party.

  • tonyj

    Mr. President, you promised to ban lobbyist.  What happened?

    • LiveFreely

       You know he’s not reading this right?

      • Obambi

         I will ban them on my last day in office when I have all their money

        And LiveFreely, I read this most days

    • guest

      LOL did you ever check into this guy.  He was taking money from lobbyists before he made it to office.  Even his wife was given a nice comfy paycheck and fake title so he would vote certain ways when in the senate.

  • Heisenberg7

    They should call it Copyright Unhingement: as in, the Government has to unhinge their jaw just to get their mouth around the MAFIAA’s dick.

  • Guest

    Although he won’t say it both because it would make him look bad in court and it would not work this election, but how much you want to bet what he really meant was “Vote Pirate Party”??

  • Strawbear

    News Just In:
    Pot calls Kettle Black

    MPAA and KDC are two sides of the same grasping greedy coin. 

    Both take unfairly from artists who deserve better. 

    (Now I have deja vu…)

    • Anyone

      next you’ll claim Western Digital takes advantage of artists by selling harddrives

      • LiveFreely

         Harddrives are used to store illegal stolen content that hurts artists.

        The majority of harddrive sales are for illegal purposes. Harddrive manufacturers are enabling and encouraging copyright infringement and defrauding copyright holders by denying them of their due profits.

        Harddrive manufacturers, wholesale distributors, and retailers are organized criminals profiting from copyright infringement and therefore should all be shut down and have their assets seized.

        Companies that want to keep manufacturing and selling harddrives should be required to implement a system that allows copyright holders to delete their content from your harddrives.

        /snarky snark snark

        • Guest

          You may as well sue the computer manufacturers for making the computers that is used for illegal purposes. You may as well sue Microsoft for making the operating software needed to use the computers for illegal purposes. LOL

        • Anyone

          @9684bc8608dc65c95e51baebe9528fb9:disqus
          and Linux
          they are STEALING from Microsoft and Apple because they are sharing their OS for FREE!
          think of poor Jobs and Gates, how will they ever feed their families when Linus Torvalds remains free to STEAL from them!

        • http://gene-poole.tumblr.com Gene Poole

          @anyone pretty sure Jobs isn’t feeding anybody but the worms right now.

        • LiveFreely

           Money is used to buy illegal stolen copyrighted content that hurts artists.

          Seize all the money and give to it us.

          All your money, your mind, your body, your soul, are belong to us!!!

          Why can’t you understand this?

        • Anyone

          @Gene_P00le:disqus
          I simply couldn’t remember the name of the new guy :(
          I mean Gates also doesn’t work at MS anymore, but he is still more famous than Ballmer

        • meowmix

          heh. i made a sarcastic post about that the other day.

  • SlamJack

    MPAA and RIAA are corrupt! lol to say the least. Now to kill them for good.

  • Andrew me

    As much as I side with him on this point I don’t think calling for Obama to be voted out will help much, people who support Romney will support the studios as soon as they get into power and start paying the politicians to support them.

    I like his idea of suing them out of business, and I would support this if it was possible for me to, I also like the fact that he is going to start giving the artists 90% of there profits but not how he is going to do it.

    But he will just be joining others that are attempting to do the same thing, maybe he will be the one who tips the scales and shows the artists that they can make a lot more money going private and more and more leave the sinking ships of the labels.

    But in all of this I see the people hopefully winning, where more and more money is taken from the Mpaa/RIAA and that this takes a lot of there power away from them, I think the best thing though is where the politicians who have been involved in this charade have to face questions about there actions , which it seems they have admitted to. Where they have to take responsibility for costs that could rise into the billions for the Government they are not going to be very popular if other politicians have to cut back on there special projects because of a few politicians filling there pockets with blood money.

  • miz

    I am not sure why Mitt Romney is suggested other than the idea that if even promoting Ron Paul does not lead to his election, then otherwise it may hinder Mitt Romney’s opportunity to take the election away from Barack Obama.  Otherwise this article should have been supportive of Ron Paul or at least referenced this or another idea to justify Mitt Romney.

    • LiveFreely

       Maybe DotCom doesn’t like Ron Paul.

  • Luke Solis

    Just noticed something. where’s that “no to pirate” guy? this seems like a topic that he would comment on. Interested what he as to say.

    • Anyone

      probably not paid for today

    • Guest

      Its a wonder that the person you are referring is not jumping up and down on the roof top with posting comments on the surfthechannel article earlier. lol

  • Vincent Giannell

    I’m sure MPAA and RIAA will call Dotcom a liar for saying they’re corrupting the US Government.

    • LiveFreely

       And then pay officials to deny it? :D

      • Guest

        and try and get stoogies to spread the word in public lol

    • Guest

      Nah more likely they will say that he is arrogant and trying to sway the public as per earlier article on here lol

      • Vincent Giannell

         No. They’ll think that won’t work a second time.

      • Anarchy

         Yes,  only governments are allowed to do that,  dont you know

        And who says it can only be that way,  yep you guessed it,  governments!

  • some guy

    Give me a place to sign that legalizes file sharing. I buy the albums for my collection and download for my ipod. The Gov should be happy with everything.99 percent of everything

    • LiveFreely

       I have no idea what you just said.

  • http://twitter.com/krozareq krozareq

    Nothing new. The US has always been run by corporations. Just look at the entire history of the country from the railroads to the Asia trade. 

    • theonlyone

       Very true. Anyone who has lived in the US and is old enough to vote should know how corrupt our government really is.

  • BidenObamaPuppets

    So True. Kim Dotcom hit the nail on the head. Biden and Obama are puppets for Hollywood.

    • LiveFreely

       Big Business = Big Business

      Romney + Obama can both be said to be puppets of Big Business… this one in this way and that one in that way.

      Corruption when it comes to ______ leads to corruption when it comes to everything else.

      Neither of them, nor any other candidate is the answer.

      You + Me = The Answer

  • http://emilie.hermit.net/ Hermit

    The US is a bipolar kleptocracy, carefully designed to ensure that meaningful change is impossible without the consent of the 0.1%. Democrats and Republicans are equally owned. Votes in such a system are utterly meaningless. Only by eliminating the system itself can we hope to change things. The entire system is structured for self-preservation. Only votes for the Pirate Party or other non-affiliated representatives offer a chance of change outside of revolution, but, Catch-23, the Pirate Party and other non-affiliated people are invisible and so don’t get votes. Why you may ask, are the Pirate Party and non-affiliated people invisible? Ah, yes. See the above.
    What the USA needs if it seeks change is not to replace the incumbent government with one that has a lower IQ and more money, but is effectively identical apart from the party name*, but a nice new plank and hungry sharks installed on the Potomac.

    *except perhaps, for the members having even less compassion for anyone
    who isn’t a billionaire, coupled with deep, abiding and insatiable
    interest in poking into other people’s vaginas – and a confusing terror
    of gay marriage coupled with a passion for boy scouts.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: MPAA / RIAA Corrupted the U.S. Government - Webmaster Forum: Webhosting, SEO, Internet Marketing

  • robthom

    Once again we are only given the choice of a lesser evil, different corporate crony for president.

    All we can do is keep voting the bastards out after they grab everything they can, and vote a different bastard in.

    And thats really the only option until people pull their heads out of their butts enough to enable an viable third party.

  • AJ

      He’s getting nervous,saw that Anton Vickerman got 4 years for making 35 thousand pounds a month,he made millions so a much longer sentence possible.

  • MEGA-Joint

    We’re all fucked!

  • Guest

    Well, Nej? Still want to argue that the law is the law, everyone gets judged fairly and all that idealistic wool-over-the-eyes bullshit?

    Take note that you still haven’t explained how artists benefit from all this. You’re a completely evasive, whiny little bitch of a shitstain, aren’t you?

    • Dirty_Bear

      What is there to say really? Kim Dotcom says something and everyone jumps onto it like leeches. 

      No evidence, what so ever, is provided other than his word. Who is to say that Kim isn’t trying to play the gulable into his favour by using their existing hate for american polititions. 

      It seems to me that he is shitting bricks and is getting quite desperate. 

      “Remember the Mr President song?”

      Are you serious?…..

      • Guest

         ”It seems to me that he is shitting bricks and is getting quite desperate. ”

        And yet every major turn in the investigation since the raid has made the prosecution’s case look weaker, sketchier, more corrupt, and less legal. 

        • Dirty_Bear

          Regardless, he soon won’t be able to afford to import more spring water for his swimming pool…

      • Guest

        I’m not jumping on it because Kim Dotcom is speaking; I’m jumping on it because SOME PEOPLE have yet to answer questions about how this media circus (and its topic) are beneficial to artists.

        Nice way to completely miss the point and not answer the questions. But hey, trolls like you think that anyone who disagrees with the MPAA is a Dotcom fanboy.It might surprise you, but not everyone gets paid in industry white chocolate when they say things.

        • Dirty_Bear

          ” I’m not jumping on it because Kim Dotcom is speaking; I’m jumping on it because SOME PEOPLE have yet to answer questions about how this media circus (and its topic) are beneficial to artists.”

          I was referring to your first paragraph, not your second.

          “Nice way to completely miss the point and not answer the questions. But hey, trolls like you think that anyone who disagrees with the MPAA is a Dotcom fanboy”

          I also disagree with the MPAA. Although I am aligned with their goals, I really do not like the way they go about achieving them. However, Kim is using tactics of his own which to me are also disgusting in my eyes. Trying to sway public opinion with pure bullshit and, come on, that “Mr President” is baseless propaganda plain and simple. 

          “.It might surprise you, but not everyone gets paid in industry white chocolate when they say things.”

          It might surprise you but not everyone who disagrees with you is a troll or has anything to do with the industry. Some may even be pirates, just not the run of the mill Torrentfreak variety.

        • Guest

          @Dirty_Bear:disqus 
          What about the first paragraph? Anyone who’s followed the case knows that everything was handled way over the top, and with one eye closed to proper procedure. You seem to think we’re arguing for Dotcom to get his money back to continue his lavish lifestyle. No one is. We’re mostly shocked that he’s not being given support to mount a proper defence.
          So what else do you expect? Considering the bullshit the MPAA has pulled over the case any effort at self-defence is an achievement. Dotcom just happens to be richer than the average college student the MPAA sues. Answering bullshit with bullshit is par for the course, not to say that I like Dotcom’s music.

          And again – how is all this media circus beneficial to the artists? That’s the answer we’ve been waiting to hear from those who blow the MPAA’s trumpet.

  • Xyz@gmail.com

    Voting doesn’t count. In 30 years of being alive what president has made our country better then when he started? They tell us to get involved and vote. They are all puppets. What about passing new laws as absolution you might promote. Doesn’t help when they can create new ones behind closed doors. Or when we need on to pass it has loop holes or gives up more rights then we would gain. Neetly hidden on a obscure paragrah. I’m done with believing in voting. If it worked we wouldn’t be knee deep in dung.

  • FuzzyDuck

    Dotcom is right of course, pro-Hollywood Obama is a disaster for the free Internet.

    Still I think Obama will win anyway, so voting for someone else is a good way to say “enough Mr. President, we’ve had it with your anti-Internet behavior”.

    Only I’d say vote for Gary Johnson, the independent candidate and the only real choice for freedom. He won’t win, but at least your conscience will be clear, and you won’t be responsible for keeping in power a president who will certainly push for SOPA like laws and executive orders for his Hollywood friends.

    (And I am not even mentioning the Obama drone murder program, and Obama’s persecution of whistleblowers, etc, etc…. all of which are sickening in their own right.)

    • Guest

       Wow, you’re just overflowing with the stupid aren’t you?

  • meowmix

    i read that and though ‘i know you are, but he pails into insignificance compared to you’. i like the way arrogant and filthy rich fuckheads are accusing someone of being just like them. irony doesn’t come close to that if you ask me.

  • meowmix

    if you took the corruption out of the us govt, there wouldn’t be a govt. there would be an empty vacuum.

  • ahwront

    Where are you Lee osvald ?

  • Joogrannie

    “Romney is simply the better bet for a free Internet.”

    Bull Shit.  Romney is the *WORST* possible choice here.  Stick to Aussie politics.

    • Drive-by Twatting

       New Zealand is not Australia. Stick to statements that don’t involve geography.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: MPAA / RIAA Corrupted the US Government - TorrentFreak - Sync Spot - Exclusive

  • Guest

    Oh, Kim.  You seriously think that Romney would do it better?  He would be much more damaging than Obama could hope to be.  I hate the two party system.  It forms a binary and forces you to make that classic choice of trying to decide which is the lesser of the two evils.

  • Jimbo

    i hope Kim is able to expose the other governments and countries that were in on this as well as the US. the UK springs immediately to mind, given the way they are taking it up the rear from the US just to please Hollywood!

  • AJ

    just been listening to the geek radio show where they discussed this whole filesharing saga,seems they think the next targets are likely to include torrentday,kat and cg.who knows!

  • Yer Cheain’ Heart

    Get it straight people.  Kim is just a schemer, a professional truth stretcher, and someone who is more than willing to make money on anyone else’s back.  He has no issues at all.

    Trust me, he laughs his (oversized) ass off every time one of you guys was signing up to his system to download pirated stuff.  He knows you are an idiot for paying him for what is already widely available, and in doing so, you help feel his lavish, self-serving lifestyle.  All that while taking money away from the people who actually make the content you like.

    He’s screwing you as much as he screws everyone else, riding your sympathy for the pirate cause all the way to his lavish life.

    WAKE UP.  Stop supporting this guy.  He’s out to screw it all up for you.

    • kevins_76

       Kim doesn’t like being called “wealthy and arrogant” but really it’s an accurate description.  :)

      One he lives in a 30 million dollar mansion, so I don’t see how he takes offense to being called “wealthy.”  Second, he should remember what happened to Napster.  What is it, aside from arrogance, would lead him to believe the same legal trouble wouldn’t happen to him as well? 

      Personally I’ve never been to megaupload’s site, but the entire idea seems poorly thought out to me.  If someone is going to (possibly) break the law due to the actions of others, the first rule ought to be “don’t create a centralized operation that can be shut down…. iow don’t do what Napster did” 

    • Anyone

      noone was forcing people to sign up to MegaUpload, they did so because it offered a great service that they were willing to pay for

      sure, most of the content was also available on other sites and sources, but that doesn’t stop iTunes from selling it, now does it? ;)

  • kevins_76

     I don’t see how Romney would help Kim DotCom.  The PRO-IP law used to take down megaupload was signed by G.W. Bush in 2008. 

    • MadAsASnake

       It’s not about that – it’s about having a dig at Obama.

      • kevins_76

        Like Obama is going to put on super-hero tights and bail out a guy who made millions of dollars breaking U.S. laws? :)

  • Shitforbrains

    oooh they are all out to get us……..ohhhh they want to stop us from stealing….ooooh our lives have not turned out how we them to and it is all the nasty goverments fault….boo fucking hoo you theiving cunts…by your stuff then it would all be ok…
    K?OK!

    • drksilenc

      TROLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLLLLOLOLLLL

  • Byte Master

    Kim Dotcom is wrong if he thinks that MPAA/RIAA haven’t already reached out to Romney years ago. And they will have explained that *publicly* they will have no choice but to support the powers-that-be, but behind the scenes they make sure that all potential candidates are being “invited into the fold”, to be made more public once they are in power.

    Let’s hope that the upcoming revenue from the MegaBox project will be used to crush the RIAA/MPAA and their plants^H^H^H^H^H friends within the US Government.

  • Pingback: Megaupload’s Kim Dotcom tweets plans for new music service Megabox – NEWS.com.au | Page3gossips

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: MPAA / RIAA Corrupted the U.S. Government – TorrentFreak | NotSoCrazyNews

  • http://twitter.com/filbypott William Staples

    “Hollywood and the MPAA are only backing Obama’s re-election and can’t
    expect any favors from Mitt Romney. Romney is simply the better bet for a
    free Internet.”

    Obama supports corporate monopolies behind closed doors; Romney does it out in the open. And that’s not getting into Romney’s extremely regressive, reactionary attitude to the rights of women and LGBT people, which Obama has a pretty decent track record on, or the fact that Romney supports the same kind of police-state intrusion into your private affairs (ie the PATRIOT Act) as both Obama and Bush. Internet rights are important, but they can’t be the single issue you vote on.

    If you’re going to support an alternative to Obama – and make no mistake, Obama is by far the lesser of two evils compared to Romney – make it a left-wing libertarian in the vein of Kucinich or Nader who understands the dangers of unrestrained government AND corporate power.

    • MadAsASnake

       Great choice. If it was my vote, it would be for neither of them.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: MPAA / RIAA Corrupted the US Government – TorrentFreak | pguides.net

  • sott.net

    Romney is better for a free internet??? LOL!  If it were up to him, anything against religion would be banned. 
    But I suppose Kim Dotcom likes Romney (and his running mate Ryan)  because of another reason.
    TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH, YAYYYYY

  • Guest

    For those of you pushing Rom Paul….wake the F up!  He’s a Republican.  Not a libertarian.  He will favor big business as long as he gets to smoke pot.  That’s all.

    • http://twitter.com/filbypott William Staples

      Thank you. Ron Paul understands the importance of curtailing government power, but he doesn’t understand – or doesn’t care – that corporations wield huge amounts of power as well AND don’t have to concern themselves with reelection. He’ll stop the government from intruding on our lives, sure – by selling that power to the highest bidder.

  • http://smclocksmith.ca/ Joselyn

    Hollywood and the music business can easily be described using the same
    terms. In addition, “swaying public opinion” is one of the main goals of
    both the MPAA and RIAA.

  • still kicking

    What do virtually all of the top executives in the media industry have in common with virtually all of the top executives on major Wall Street firm besides being incredibly greedy and corrupt? Hint. What do they also have in common with some extremely powerful political lobbies who essentially dictate US foreign policy in the Middle East? In fact, many of these top executives are members of these specific political lobbies. 

    Why is the US government acting as a police agency for the media companies? Why has not a single one of those on Wall Street responsible for the greatest economic collapse in our lifetime been sent to prison or even charged with anything? Why did the US really invade Iraq when Saddam clearly was of no threat to US interests and was certainly not a friend of Al Qaeda?

    It’s all connected together right down to the failure of the media companies to embrace modern technology, and have to spend some of their own money, so as to co op the obvious movement towards the downloading of content and its personalization. The same connection that piled bad debt upon bad debt, and continues to do so to this day, with no regards to the overall well being of anyone but their own selfish selves. And the same connection that scammed the US to spend over 1 trillion dollars and the loss of thousands of innocent lives with zero regards as to the inhumane outcome. What kind of a culture creates a mindset of such disdain and arrogance towards others?

  • Troof

    Thinking that either major candidate is going to change anything for the better in these matters is a lolsterpiece.

    Also: Kim Dotcom = Augustus Gloop and Francis, rolled into one whiny lump.

  • Pingback: Kim Dotcom: MPAA Has Corrupted the U.S. Government

  • Wth
  • Kim

    So, all you dumb asses are going to vote in the hopes of helping a fat, low-life, thieving bastard get even richer?  Kim Dotcom is exactly what’s wrong with the world.  He contributes nothing – no innovation, no social good.  He just steals shit and gives it to other people and gets incredibly rich in the process.  Way to pick your heroes, losers.  

  • fangbin818

    tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2

  • shengcai948

    tinyurl.com/cyk9xz2

  • Pingback: Obama Ambassador In Cambodia On Day Pirate Bay Founder Was Arrested | TorrentFreak

  • Pingback: Obama Ambassador In Cambodia On Day Pirate Bay Founder Was Arrested | Best Seedbox

  • Pingback: Obama Ambassador In Cambodia On Day Pirate Bay Founder Was Arrested | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: Obama Ambassador In Cambodia On Day Pirate Bay Founder Was Arrested

  • Pingback: Obama Ambassador In Cambodia On Day Pirate Bay Founder Was Arrested | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.