TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Kiwi Government Reveals Revamped Anti-Piracy Law

Following massive protests from the public, New Zealand’s proposed ‘guilty upon accusation’ anti-piracy law was scrapped earlier this year, although not for long. A revamped version of the law, that was initially characterized as unfair and unworkable, has been revealed today.

blackoutIn 2008, the New Zealand government introduced a ‘three-strikes’ law which was designed to have alleged copyright infringers disconnected from the Internet. The legislation, commonly referred to as Section92, went largely unnoticed until the media picked it up.

The media attention led to widespread protests. Most noticeable was ‘Operation Blackout’, where hundreds of thousands ‘blacked out’ their profile images on social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, and not without success. The objections eventually caused the government to scrap the law and go back to the drawing board. Not for long though.

Fast forward a few months and the government already has a new and ‘improved’ version of the anti-piracy legislation ready. The new plan no longer includes the ‘guilty upon accusation” section where consumers had little options to appeal a potential disconnection. However, the new text also includes the option for copyright holders to demand $15,000 in damages from repeated copyright infringers.

“I want to stress that account holders will have the opportunity during each of these processes to defend claims by right holders,” Commerce Minister Simon Power said in a comment.

Under the new law, ISPs would no longer be obliged to simply disconnect every user accused of repeatedly downloading copyrighted material, without solid proof. Instead, all account holders can request a hearing at the Copyright Tribunal if they don’t agree with the proposed penalty or the evidence presented against them.

From current reports it is not clear how the copyright holders will collect evidence on alleged copyright infringers. The past has shown that their data gathering techniques are not always the most accurate, to say the least. If this is the case, we can expect to see many appeals once the new proposals become law in the coming year.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • TorGuard

NewsBits

The latest news from around the web, not covered on the frontpage

  • Dutch ISPs Appeal Pirate Bay Blockade

    Two weeks ago the Court of The Hague ordered several ISPs to prevent subscribers from accessing...

  • TorrentFreak Censored by Orange’s Child Protection Filter

    The Internet is a scary place for kids, but luckily there’s censorship. In the UK mobile...

  • “How We Stopped SOPA”

    After the historic protests in January SOPA and PIPA were ‘shelved’. In a keynote speech at...

  • Supreme Court Refuses $675,000 File-Sharing Case

    The case of the RIAA vs. Joel Tenenbaum – aka the case that will not die...

  • MPAA: Piracy is NOT Theft After All

    For decades the entertainment industry used the word “theft” to refer to piracy. Most famous is...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.