TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme

Friday night the anti-piracy law firm ACS:Law accidentally published its entire email archive online, effectively revealing how the company managed to extract over a million dollars (£636,758.22) from alleged file-sharers since its operation started. On average, 30% of the victims who were targeted paid up, and this money was divided between the law firm, the copyright holder and the monitoring company.

Right before the weekend the notorious ACS:Law managed to expose backups of its entire website and email database to the outside world. Hundreds of people have meanwhile started to dissect the contents of the mails, and are sharing their findings in forums and in comments posted online.

Aside from a lot of personal stuff, regular passwords, PayPal details and private pictures, the emails also shed a whole new light on the effectiveness of the letters of claim that are being sent out to thousands of BitTorrent users and how the recouped money was divided.

The table below details how many letters were sent out to file-sharers over the last two years per client, and how effective these claims were. In total, 11,367 have been sent out. In 40% of the cases the respondents never replied, and another 30% disputed their claim. This means that on average 30% of the accused file-sharers chose to settle by paying between £350 and £700 per infringement allegation.

Client Letters Disputed Non-responders
Digiprotect 6640 1992 2656
Topware 590 177 236
Techland 364 109 146
Reality Pump 236 71 94
Media C.A.T 3537 1066 1406
Total 11367 3415 4538

The recouped money is generally divided between three parties. The law firm, the copyright holder and the monitoring company that provided IP addresses of alleged infringers. The shares differ between the various clients, but as can be seen in the table below the law firm always gets a significant portion of the money – between 37.5% and 52.5%.

Client Share to Client (%) Share to Firm (%) Share to monitoring company (%)
Digiprotect 50 37.5 12.5
Reality Pump 25 42 33
Topware 25 42 33
Techland 33 42 25
Media C.A.T 35 52.5 12.5
Yann Peifer 40 45 15

So how much money has been made thus far by the parties involved? Previously we could only take ACS:Law owner Andrew Crossley’s word for it. In April this year he used The Law Society Gazette to announce that he had “recovered close to £1m for my clients” but unfortunately he can now be seen to have been economical with the truth.

Using figures now available though the email leak, we can see that by 28 April 2010 around $1m (£636,758.22) had been paid by the victims.

In everything that we’ve seen thus far it is clear that the sole motivation of the legal action has been to generate as much money as possible. Documents in the leak show ACS:Law admitting that they asked for a settlement of £495 in order to break the ‘psychological’ £500 barrier to maximize revenues.

Client Money Recovered Paid to Client Paid to monitoring company Paid to Firm
Digiprotect £346,607.90 £151,625.86 £45,060.21 £131,048.38
Topware £68,127.47 £10,880.48 £10,881.48 £23,551.18
Techland £22,474.85 £795.93 £590.00 £2,228.43
Reality Pump £34,866.90 £3519.16 £4,645.28 £7,628.20
Media C.A.T £164,681.00 £35,350.57 £15,066.06 £55,957.20
Total £636,758.22 £202,172.00 £76,243.03 £220,413.39

It is needless to say that ACS:Law’s operation has proven to be quite profitable. However, it is doubtful that this will last. Aside from the information that has come out thus far, the leaked emails contain several bits of information that could put the unfortunate law firm out of business. More on that later.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • dont stop

    please pass on link to this infomation to every newpaper, tv channel, IT magazine, consumer rights magazine you can find.

    Thankyou

  • Anonymous Poster

    Ah, schadenfreude. What a way to start the new week.

  • TerribleTony

    Digiprotect managed to negotiate much higher rates than the other companies, I guess both ACS and DP didn’t want that little bit of info leaking out.

  • ytb

    payback is a B*** ain’t it :)

  • Blackplan

    Confirmed what everyone already knew. Good Stuff :D

  • Anonymous
  • Anoniempje

    Ah, this looks more like it. I am really hoping for a second MediaDefender-ish fail! Payback is a bitch, don’t mess with teh interwebz, they will mess back! What goes up has got to fall.

  • Anonymous

    From: Hazel Marie Sutch
    To: …, Stacy Birdsey, …
    Subject: =[
    Date: 22/06/10 21:50:49

    Hi Guys,

    ..Dont Know if You Know, But i Wont Be Coming Back After Today =[
    Lets Just Say Andrew is A Big Fat Bum-Head :] Lol,

  • Anonymous

    I’m in the process of emailing some of the many people who received letters and informed them of the data leak

  • jamie

    ernesto destroy these b@~tards please

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • The Doctor

    @ comment 9.

    I am glad someone has started doing this. There are a lot of innocent victims to the terrible Data Protection methods ACS have used.

  • anonomous
  • Mr.Afghanistan

    Anti Piracy are some retards @ssholes.

  • insider

    big shameeeee

    longlife to TF from scenetime.com
    for this news

  • insider

    big shameeeee

    longlife to TF from http://www.scenetime.com
    for this news

  • alexander

    i think we should create a mail list of the victims and start sending letters in order to inform them about what is happening, it’s not fair that they paid money to acs law, people should definitely demand their money back

  • Anonymous

    Wow, T has sum explaining to do now…

  • Anonymous

    BT <—- not T

  • The Doctor

    I am curious about how Media C.A.T comes to have the private details of the individuals, as indicated by the emails from Ali to Andrew et al.

    It is one thing for ACS to request from the court and therefore ISP’s the contact details, but it appears that ACS is then passing this data back to Media C.A.T to update their excel s/sheet, before a “final” version is resent to ACS.

    Surely Media C.A.T should have simply supplied a list of IP addresses and ACS should have controlled the private info and updated it themselves.

    Is this not a further breach of the Data Protection Act?

    Does Media C.A.T follow the Data Protection laws and are they registered?

    Something else worth looking further into…..

  • anon2

    hope these emails are passed on to the UK Law Society and are used as evidence against this prick. problem is, how long can they delay the hearing? i bet it will be as long as possible. as he is one of ‘the clan, one of the old boys club’, they are not going to do anything if they can help it. makes them look almost as bad as he does!

  • Server Backup

    The full server backup, including emails and more, is called backup-8.24.2010_12-58-28_acslawor. It’s on Pirate Bay too.

    http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5852309/ACS-Law_server_backup_%28mails_RSA_keys_access_logs…%29

    Don’t believe the seed count. Use magnet link and make sure DHT and Peer Exchange are enabled.

  • Rob

    Exactly why I wouldn’t have paid shit to em!

  • Help the victims

    The poor sods whose data has been leaked need contacting so they can be added to the throng.

  • joe

    So nobody who completely ignored them ever got taken to court? Did they get summonses at all?

  • hellonearthis

    Where is the rest from the Total of £636,758.22

    £202,172.00 +
    £76,243.03 +
    £220,413.39
    =
    £498,828.42

  • anon army

    Why havent acs law commented on anything yet. Is it because the papers havent been involved yet. Well thats about to change i have informed some very large papers in the uk, watchdog and which? its only a matter of time before this goes national. Anyone in uk not using talk talk and virgin i would suggest calling your isp and asking if your information is safe maybe starting somethings from there as someone posted earlier BT are now aware of this issue and investigating it, i dont think they are too happy that acs law have leaked some of their customers info.

  • Kane

    Here are all the Prank Calls,

    http://soundcloud.com/kan3

    Enjoy.

  • joe

    Prank calls are idiotic.

  • Pingback: [TF] ACS:Law Anti-Piracy Law Firm Torn Apart By Leaked Emails - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net

  • jack

    A post has just gone up in alt.binaries.warez which is the leaked emails pre loaded into ThunderbirdPortable.
    “ACS:LAW-Pre Loaded on ThunderbirdPortable” go to nzb.nl or binsearch.info use the search and make yourself an nzb. Use the README file for instructions, but basically download the file, decompress the RAR and click the Thunderbird launcher.
    A preview of the layout can be viewed here. http://www.stooorage.com/show/559/1104763_preview-thunderbirdportableacs.jpg

  • Anonymous

    There seems to be an email regarding the Digital Britain Report in the preview screen shot, does anyone know what his thoughts on that are?

  • @28 jack

    Care to elaborate on how that was accomplished? Not everyone has a usenet account.

  • anon

    @ jack upload to filehost mate and yes how can i view these emails without my head turning in code from notepad

  • Anonymous

    I’VE Contacted over 50 people from the emails just to let them know what’s going on. i’ve also suggested they contact the relevant organisations to complain and seek legal advice.

  • jack

    @30 & 31,
    You need a news server account and news client, but don’t worry if you’re not into that, I’m hoping someone will download the a.b.warez file, make a Torrent and start seeding it from a fast seedbox. I’m sure it will get spread around the communities quite quickly and appear on a Torrent server in the next few hours.

  • Starbucks_guy

    So, are there any news from Andrew Crossley or is he browsing the net at a coffee shop because his train is late?

  • Anonymous

    Does anyone remember who the Lord was who spoke about ACS:Law in the House of Lords in recent months? Perhaps he should also be made aware of this leak and its contents?

  • Anonymous

    Mass rename them to .eml files to import them into thunderbird, use something like this to do that: http://www.bulkrenameutility.co.uk/Download.php

  • Anonymous

    The strange thing is that people have informed all the major media outlets many times a day since this happened. How many tv stations, papers have run the story?

    None as far as I know.

  • Kaptain Krunch

    Ar! £636,758.22 by lawfully blackmailing citizens of any age.

  • Keep contacting the press

    I`m sure this story will run, dont forget its the weekend.

    Its also likely that any Sky related news outlet will indeed bury the story.

    I imagine BBC and The Guardian are the most likley candidates.

    Breaches of DPA and leak of c/card details are the most likely to attract new interest, also, human angle type storys’ (Granny’s being bullied into paying, single mums etc etc)

    Keep plugging away at the press, local and national, perhaps even contact you`re local MP.

    This will break, once one outlet publish’s the rest will follow.

  • Anonymous

    @31 just grab a copy of GrabIt, when it asks for news server enter a.b.warez (its free) go to http://binsearch.info/?q=ACS%3ALAW-Pre+Loaded+on+ThunderbirdPortable&max=100&adv_age=730&server=

    and download the nsz, then open in grab it,

  • joseph

    its a clear cut case of internet PWNAGE!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Anyone who paid ACS out of court settlements via credit card should report it as a fraudulent charge and they will have the money returned.

    Do it quick before he becomes bankrupt. Your card supplier legally has the do this no matter what they tell you.

    Someone please make a victim mailing list and let them all know this.

  • Anonymous

    >>Someone please make a victim mailing list and let them all know this.

    +1 \o/

  • Contact the Govt.
  • Anonymous
  • BBC

    Why hasn’t the BBC made a story about this already.. FFS they made a story about facebook crashing — http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/11403897

    Corruption!

  • omg

    Extortion, outwresting, and/or exaction is a criminal offense which occurs when a person unlawfully obtains either money, property or services from a person(s), entity, or institution, through coercion.

    well to me its already over this is what we call a extortion scheme …. put them all to jail !

  • Johnny

    LOL! I guess there’s enough evidence of wrongdoing now, so that’ll be the end of Andrew. Hope he’ll become someone’s bitch in jail.

    Their site is down… hopefully forever.

  • jacko

    We have the address of these fools in London.

    Why not make a protest outside!

  • noko

    Andrew Crossley is one conceited end result of a failed abortion…

  • Anon

    Extracts from the employee handbook (.jmiller@acs-law_co_uk\.old inbox) – email dates 16/10/2009:

    “Employees are expected to preserve in absolute confidence all information regarding the company and its clients… Certain information is vital to the company, and any breach of confidentiality will seriously injure the company’s reputation in the profession and damage its relationships with those who have entrusted it with confidential business information… The improper use or disclosure of confidential client or business information will not be tolerated and will result in disciplinary action”

  • PORNOSATAN

    So I’ve been reading through them, and I found their income statements, and ACS Law is making approximately $65,000 to $135,000 a month with their little business, which is just 8% to 15% of the total letters sent out per month.

  • http://www.efax.com/

    andy’s efax number 442079909099
    pin 9988

  • zappa

    Searching Google News on this, I notice a few sites are reporting that 350MB of emails were published.

    The file was compressed, it’s closer to 1.5GB of emails.

  • changed?

    I cant get into efax?!?

  • Kaptain Krunch

    @34 Andy’s train was late. ROFL

  • silversurfer

    what plp are forgetting is that the mpaa ect are the same as acs but no one has gottent tho there firewalls/honeypots to see there emails it will be a bigger and intresting read i bet
    there the real thugs that need to be thrashed over the coals

    this is a small victory for the masses the bigger war still needs to be won keep up the gd fight [ hack the planet ]

  • http://www.efax.com/

    @ changed?
    i just checked efax and no ones changed the password – it shud still work

  • God

    This leaked credit card fiasco is worthy of security news websites. Anyone inform threatpost.com yet?

  • changed?

    Aye, innit now! \o/

  • ahem
  • jesus

    @God

    Just tipped them off.

  • JonathanWilson

    The sad thing is, when this does break in the press they will no doubt slant it against the hackers and for acs;law

    “hackers release personal info of customers on to the web” or some such diatribe.

    lets face it, when the leaked emails about the falsification of climate data were released the press/bbc all slanted it to sound like the data was sound but bad hackers were being nasty on the interweb :-/

  • The Doctor

    Posted by ACSgits over on

    http://www.slyck.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=44092&sid=e0ce2efdae9fd9bb16e834be54c33a43&start=9875

    Please read, it appears to be discussion on the potential legal basis and issues with attempting to take any claims to court and attempting to claim a file was made available to more than one downloader.

    “If the court were to apply criminal standards to the evidence then I believe that the court would decline to award damages. Therefore the claimant would have to rely upon the balance of probabilities and that needs to be evidenced to some degree. As far as I am aware there are NO academic studies which have evaluated how many people the average participant in a P2P session shares a file with. To empirically establish that it would be necessary to either monitor the packet level inbound and outbound transmissions of an infringer (an action which is against the law) or have permission from the participants to record such information. without some level of direction on quantification it would be impossible, as =i>Newzbin found, to determine the degree of sharing.”

  • Me

    Ref to #28
    ThunderbirdPortableACS.rar

    http://gettyfile.ru/627399/

  • McFapper

    @28 Can someone please post that Thunderbird Portable file containing all the emails onto a filehost please? I’d love to get my hands on it.

  • pal

    Since this leak is linked to 4chan, I very much doubt it was an “accidental” post of all their emails. Either way, pay back’s a bitch.

  • Anon

    The worst thing about these emails is reading the replies from people who pay up the £495.

    All very apologetic, talking about paying their “fine”, saying they will never do it again.

    ACS Law are crooks.

  • Ned

    @67 Respectfully, I think your wrong to suggest it wasn’t accidental. Anon have done plenty of hacks in the past and have been open and honest about it. If they hacked the ACS law website then they would be up front and honest with it.

  • ask0

    Anyone coming across emails involving Trust Accounting issues – those are the jackpot – forward to law society.

  • ask0

    Adrian Chen from Gawker has a fascination with 4Chan and what the get up to and has various written articles.

    http://gawker.com/5641634/4chan-attack-brings-down-mpaa-website

    Worth sending him a message. My account has been banned and have been unable to log on.

  • Anon

    @70 inbox & date for thos trust accounting emails?

  • Observing party

    “I long abandoned the concept of a harmonious and peaceful family life when this work came along and ruined my life!”

    -Andrew Crossley on Aug 22, 2010

  • Hello

    On 21 Jul 2010, at 09:24, Emma-Jane Sleator-Rollinson wrote:

    Dear Andrew,

    Having thought seriously about the SRA list of paralegal details you have asked me to compile I do not to consent to being identified in any way, by initials or full name.

    I understand why you want to provide details of staff qulifications and achievements but I began working at ACS Law on 10 May 2010 and I understand the SRA investigation stems from sometime in 2008.

    I apologise for any inconvenience caused.

    Kind regards

    Emma-Jane Sleator-Rollinson

  • who is who

    Who is who?

    * Who is “Adam Glen”?? He appears to be a solicitor advising Crossley on liability for copyright infringement, whether to pursue or drop particular cases against subscribers, and in his correspondence with the SRA.

    * Andrew Hooper QC, advises Crossley on the SRA investigation against him and his referral to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. Says “ hiandrew.hopper@ahqc.com , http://www.ahqc.com/

  • ask0

    @ 72

    I came across the fact that Trust Accounting issues are present from another commentator in the first story regarding the leak on Torrentfreak ” Law firm torn apart”

    here is the comment made by poster 297

    ” Also, the sent mail folder shows that he had a client matter which was overdrawn by £10,000 for about 6 weeks, as a result of making two payments out of the client account instead of just one. He claims that the bookkeeper didn’t inform him, so it’s not really his fault.

    Unfortunately the email shows him admitting that he hadn’t been checking the client matter balance listings as part of the monthly reconciliation process that he (as sole regulated principal at the firm) is required to sign off under the Solicitors Accounts Rules.

    Looks like his AR1 Accountant’s Report Form will be showing a qualification for a fairly hefty breach of the accounting rules this year… oops… “

  • ACS:LAW

    Andrew J Crossley is available to discuss your concerns about his legitimate struggle to beat piracy and ensure the artists get what they deserve.

    For a confidential chat anytime, please call 01403 753 759

    Press are more than welcome.

    If he is not available or busy then a representative will help you.

    If you prefer to write a letter instead then the address is

    Andrew J Crossley
    5 Oak Way
    Ifold, Loxwood
    BILLINGSHURST
    West Sussex
    RH14 0RU
    United Kingdom

    Our website is very popular therefore unavailable at this time so we would urge you to please call or write as per above.

    Please do not send template letters as they are annoying and we have seen thousands of them already.

  • Anonymous

    acslawlm@googlemail.com
    @
    sbirdsey@acs-law.co.uk

    “We are obliged to answer all infringers questions and queries, albeit some of them to try and elongate the process!”

  • comaX

    acslawlm@googlemail.com
    @
    sbirdsey@acs-law.co.uk

    “We are obliged to answer all infringers questions and queries, albeit some of them to try and elongate the process!”

  • comaX

    I told Terence I was going to Cannes with two hot babes and some gay looking bloke!

    Andrew J. Crossley

  • Anon

    Dear Sirs,

    With reference to your letter received 14th April 2010 concerning Infringement of Copyright. I would like to say that neither myself or my husband remember ever downloading the said film but as you have received evidence from our ISP along with the date and time we cannot therefore deny it. We accept that we have to pay the sum of £495 but we would ask if it is possible to pay the amount over a period of time as we are both OAP’s with limited income and simply do not have £495 to pay to you in a lump sum.

    Since the date of the incident our computer has had two seperate virus infections and so our hard drives have been wiped clean twice so in all honesty the said film should no longer be in our computer.

    My husband and I are both deeply distressed about this and hope you can accept our inability to pay the amount as a lump sum and accept our offer to pay on a monthly basis.

    Yours faithfully,

    [name redacted]

  • The Doctor

    I really wonder how many of his Para legals will be hanging around come Monday.

    This is the sort of stuff that can kill a career even before it gets started.

  • Anon

    @76 – yeah, that was me… was just wondering if there was another one that I had missed.

    His reporting accountant will be obliged to report that to the SRA when completing the Accountant’s Report form.

  • Terence Tsang formerly of ACS:WHORE

    On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Crossley wrote:
    Terence,

    Hi there…

    The Slyck crowd are on to you!

    They know where you are working…nice picture!

    I posted an entirely benign post about you leaving, as agreed. I think they had already found you though.

    Anyway, would be good to talk. Simon Gallant has mad e his application before Master Winegarten for Ministry of Sound last week. I do not know how he faired; not well would be my guess. The forum picked that up aswell.

    I will call him tomorrow and let you know.

    Keep in touch. I need a bit of help with excel. I need to import the town names into the Sky spreadsheet for evidenzia to match up wit the postcodes. I have a spreadsheet of all postcodes. Also, if I get more powerful computers could we run google docs system for the 11,000 names in Evidenzia; Ali was trying to charge me £1.00 per IP address imported! This guy is nuts. I can afford to build my own database now.

    Regards

    Andrew
    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors
    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    DX: 44643 MAYFAIR
    http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7898 0571
    Fax: 020 7898 0572
    Mob: 07816 990073

  • Me

    Ref to #28
    ThunderbirdPortableACS.rar

    http://www.megaupload.com/?d=9UBJ7243

  • Ned

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoDnDzG010c

    That is BBC One Show that gives a brief summery of the misery Andrew Crossley has caused for many thousands of people in Britain. It also gives out advice for people who have been accused. There is links at the end of the video which will give you even further and more detailed advice on how to respond to these threatening letters should you receive them.

  • who is who

    Adam Glen to Crossley, after he has ben ref to the SRT: 20/08/2010 14:46

    “Another thing is that you need to get your lobby action going. The most important person in the UK in this arena is Thomas Dillon of Flaxman Court in Scotland. He is a scary beast but, in my opinion , the architect of much of what the industry has done in getting legislation through the UK Parliament as well as architecting the Pirate Bay Case.”

    Thomas Dillon –
    “The Motion PictureAssociation (MPA) has promoted Thomas Dillon to vice president, deputy generalcounsel and regional legal director anti-piracy in the MPA’s Europe, MiddleEast and Africa office in Brussels.

    Dillon had been advising theMPA on legal issues arising from copyright and anti-piracy matters sinceJanuary 2001.

    Dillon will handle publicpolicy and litigation issues relating to the region’s anti-piracy programme,while adding responsibility for industry tax issues in Europe, the Middle Eastand Africa.

    Dillon is a member of theboth the English and California Bars, and was a barrister in the UK prior tojoining the MPA.

    ‘Thomas is a valuablemember of the MPA’s team in Europe and I am delighted that all his anti-piracyefforts on behalf of the industry over the last four years have beenrecognised,’ said Chris Marcich, senior vice president of the MPA.”

    http://www.screendaily.com/mpa-appoints-thomas-dillon-to-anti-piracy-post/4027193.article
    http://www.screendaily.com/thomas-dillon/5000696.publicprofile
    http://musically.com/blog/2010/07/14/westminster-eforum-tackling-illegal-file-sharing/
    http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/30635/11453669661copyright_article10.04.06.pdf/copyright_article10.04.06.pdf

  • Anonymous

    Andrew J Crossley
    5 Oak Way
    Ifold, Loxwood
    BILLINGSHURST
    West Sussex
    RH14 0RU

    “It was only down for a few hours. I have far more concern over the fact of my train turning up 10 minutes late or having to queue for a coffee than them wasting my time with this sort of rubbish.” (Andrew Crossley)

    Oops! Too bad. Still concerned about trains and coffee queues? ;-) ;-)

    Have a nice and sunny day,
    - The Internet (gently smiling)

  • Anon

    ThunderbirdPortable version now available on TPB : http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/5854078

  • Anonymous

    From: Andrew Crossley [mailto:andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk]
    Sent: 26 May 2010 19:53
    To: Alastair Logan
    Subject: Re: File Sharing – FYI

    Alastair,

    Thank you for these… That Deborah Prince is a total idiot. I am going to sue her. Every three months she posts an article saying I am a bully blah blah. Even after all this time she still does not understand the basics of what we do. To say someone can prove they were not at home at the time of the download totally misunderstands the very basis of our case; we say the work was made available and this usually – indeed always – happens remotely without active input by the infringer, other than the fact of joining the file sharing network makes their media content available.

    Regards

    Andrew

    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors
    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    DX: 44643 MAYFAIR
    http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7898 0571
    Fax: 020 7898 0572
    Mob: 07816 990073

  • jack

    O2 O Dear.
    Crossley takes £10,000 from DigiProtect to pay off O2

    http://www.pastebay.org/105625

  • jack

    @ 88 many thanks for seeding on TPB.
    Thanks also for others who have loaded to filehosts.

  • Anonymous

    > From: “Andrew Crossley”
    > Date: Fri, Jun 18, 2010 18:26
    > Subject: ACT and Final Warnings
    > To: “Jonathan Miller”
    >
    > Jonathan,
    >
    > Thank you for the update. I can never get hold of you on the ?phone!
    > I
    > called several times today on your blackberry, but it was always
    > switched off. If you can keep it on I some times have a thought that I
    > wish to convey or discuss and being able to speak to you is often very
    > helpful. It is no problem if you would rather forget about work in the
    > evenings and weekends, but I have to think about the work the whole
    > time.
    >
    > Thank you also for coming in on Sunday; your additional efforts over
    > and above your required time is never unappreciated and will be duly
    > recognised.
    > So thank you very much.
    >
    > I am trying to think of ways of wrong-footing the SRA and taking the
    > wind out of their sails. Sorry for the mixed metaphor. My latest
    > wheeze is to contact schools or local authorities and offer to give
    > talks to teenagers at schools about file sharing and why we do what we
    > do. I would offer to do this free of charge and offer it as a service
    > to educate young people not to file share, to prove that the work we
    > do is not all about the money.
    > What do
    > you think? If you like it or have any other ideas let me know and we
    > need to get someone to cold call.write to school authorities to offer
    > this free service. It will improve our profile with the SRA, educate
    > young people and in time reduce file sharing, which will in turn
    > benefit the creative industries.
    >
    > Regards
    >
    > Andrew
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Andrew J. Crossley
    > Principal
    > ACS Law Solicitors
    > 20 Hanover Square
    > London W1S 1JY
    > DX: 44643 MAYFAIR
    > http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    > Tel: 020 7898 0571
    > Fax: 020 7898 0572
    > Mob: 07816 990073

  • Anonymous

    By the way my work number during the day is 020 3178 8606. Call whenever you like.

  • Anonymous

    Oops my number at work is 0203 178 6806. Not what said before.

    Hooray for iPads. I love mine.

    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors

    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    DX: 44643 MAYFAIR

    http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7898 0571
    Fax: 020 7898 0572
    Mob: 07816 990073

  • liquidmonkey

    how is any of that LEGAL???
    what happens if you simply don’t respond?

  • jack

    Correspondence between Crossley and the a Government department from Blackpool who question the number of complaints about Crossley, the renewal of his license to collect debt, the manner of his demands for cash and the fact that they advise people not to pay his excessive demands & suggest 79 pence is fair recompense for a music track download.
    http://www.pastebay.org/105630

  • Anonymous

    Andrew J Crossley is available to discuss your concerns about his legitimate struggle to beat piracy and ensure the artists get what they deserve.

    For a confidential chat anytime, please call 01403 753 759

  • Pingback: Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme | Systema

  • Anonymous

    http://www.efax.com:

    efax number: 442079909099
    pin: 9988

    It’s still working…

  • comaX

    Crossley, to himself :

    College girls polled all say they like longer poles.
    http://www.windowlabs.ru/

  • jack

    Further to #96, Corossley’s license to collect debt expiredin 2008 !

    “The licence was issued by the OFT and although technically expired in 2008 is being held over by the OFT while a new application is being considered”

    Technically expired ! The creep doesn’t even have the correct authority to send out claims for money.

  • DingleBerry

    @85 Kaspersky deleted a trojan after downloading from your link.

  • Benni

    hey I just went to http://www.acs-law.org.uk and google is saying it doesn’t exsist???

    any clues

    or have Anon finally succeeded

  • Ned

    Just found this in the Jmiller inbox. I have deleted the poor lady’s name and replaced it with stars. dated 6/6/2010.

    Dear All,

    I will let you know this in person also – Please be alert for the infringer below who is likely to call in today:

    E1CA20000562 ************

    She has threatened suicide, please be careful in what is said and assure her that a letter will go out to her tomorrow.

    Many Thanks
    Leyla

  • Poor Louise Crossley

    i feel sorry for his ex-wife, the poor bitch was married to that piece of shit for 14 years then he abuses her…

    “You are fucking joke. Happy? You? With Kevin the drug addled hermit who has nothing to do with you or his family. You are the saddest person I have ever met.

    Now get the fuck away from me forever you complete washed up drug addict loser.

    Andrew your ex husband of 14 years.
    > > ”

    “Fuck off and keep out of my life.

    Andrew”

  • Unreliable Witness

    You can only question the integrity of the data when this BSkyB broadband spreadsheet supplied by BT returns many IP results as UNKNOWN.

  • Anonymous

    just to make sure i understand if you didn’t respond to the lettre they did nothing…?

  • Anonymous

    @105 yep kind of like when you don’t respond to a payal scheme email

  • Benni

    hey I just went to http://www.acs-law.org.uk and google is saying it doesn’t exsist???

    any clues

    or have Anon finally succeeded

  • Anonymous

    @105 If you ignore they get increasingly threatening with their letters. See beingthreatened.com for the info.

  • Anonymous

    OMG! I CAN’T BELIVEVE THAT A FUCKING 30% OF PEOPLE GAVE MONEY TO THESE PARASITES!

    We have to give the people a lesson in courage and aggressiveness because we are going to have an all our war with the corporations SOON and it is not going to be for the faint of hart.

    If any of these criminals try to extort YOU some money about downloading stuff, do not pay!

    I REPEAT DO NOT PAY!!!!! no matter what.

    Do not admit to anything and deny it all.

    I REPEAT DO NOT ADMIT TO ANYTHING!!!!

    Even if they drag you to court and win, Still DO NOT PAY!!!!Declare insolvency instead. It is important that not a penny go in the pocket of these parasites.

    As far as the eradication issue is concern and since the authorities are not doing their job don’t worry about this we will take care of that.

  • Anonymous

    “If you ignore they get increasingly threatening with their letters.”

    Do not ignore. Send them back a letter denying all allegations and threaten them back!

  • Wicked Wizard

    ThunderbirdPortable version now available on Demonoid http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/2397123/?rel=1285526924

  • Someone

    LOl they are using a Visual basic .net application for their detection see 06/08/2010 11:43 ACT Screens In the andrew crossley folder

  • Anonymous

    “hey I just went to http://www.acs-law.org.uk and google is saying it doesn’t exsist???”

    The site is down after being under Ddos attack by Anon just like RIAA.com, MPAA.com, Apaix.com and Hadopi.fr

  • Artists Get Nothing

    Just did a search through this article and all comments:

    Artist received no payments.

  • Anonymous

    “By the way my work number during the day is 020 3178 8606. Call whenever you like.”

    OK!

  • Kaptain Krunch

    Andrew Crossley should give his computer administrator a raise for the work well done.

  • Anonymous

    Just a thought but imagine the stink if it turned out files were deliberately made available as bate by the very people who claimed to be wronged. If they are looking for particular file titles, with a mind for the maximum return, then it would make sense to release those files themselves and wait to see what flies settled on their $#!%

    I wonder if the leaked files supports meetings with clients and subsequent leaked files, followed by subsequent data trawling.

    There’s also their argument that people are culpable for unsecured networks, an argument blown out of the water by what we see now. If they can’t secure their website and its sensitive data, what chance has joe public with his wi-fi connection?

    Just a thought.

  • Anonymous

    Something unrelated to ACS, but funny as I was checking the status of the afact.com.au website

    How much of the waffle below rings true for the average filesharer? what a load of tripe!

    “Movie Piracy
    and Organised Crime

    Movie piracy is sometimes just the tip of the iceberg. Evidence exists that movie piracy is linked to other criminal activity affecting local communities throughout Australia.

    With well over 1,000% profit margins, DVD piracy can be more profitable than drug trafficking. DVD pirates are not merely a product of market forces and entrepreneurship – central to their business model is criminal behavior extending beyond copyright theft. Money laundering, protection rackets, and even violent territorial warfare are all practices not uncommon to piracy business operations.”

  • Anonymous

    “LOl they are using a Visual basic .net application for their detection see 06/08/2010 11:43 ACT Screens In the andrew crossley folder”

    Are you sure they are not using MSbasic?

  • Anonymous

    Milochevic, Sadam Husein, Ben Laden, Andrew Crossley; it is geting clooooser!

  • Anonymous

    “i think we should create a mail list of the victims and start sending letters in order to inform them about what is happening, it’s not fair that they paid money to acs law, people should definitely demand their money back”

    Agree but since ACS law is going out of business they have better to hurry.

    Meanwhile they can charge the government of UK for being responsible for this mess since they did nothing to stop it.

  • Anonymous

    Is there a law fund in the UK to bail out people that have been caused harm by law firms that can no longer pay?

  • Anonymous

    @117 Anonymous

    afact.com.au is under Ddos attack right now by anon and it is down.

  • asc-none

    has any one managed to open the 132 O2 Digi Protect RESULTS.XLSX file that has a password?

  • noko

    You know what we need?

    One of those Hitler subbed parody videos…

  • Anonymous

    @122

    Total crap mate, I just looked at the site and it is working fine.

    The reason I looked at it, was because it was supposed to be under attack.

  • Anonymous

    I should point out that afact.org.au is working fine.

  • hahaha

    Headline: Activists target recording industry websites

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11371315

    Also http://www.theregister.co.uk/

  • Anonymous

    afact.com.au has a redirect to afact.org.au

  • someone

    @118, 100% sure, i am a qualified .net programmer and that is defently .net.. cheack the pics for yourself in the email i mentioned.

  • Jay

    Anyone else see the delicious irony in the fact that all their info is now for the world to see?

    Sweet, SWEET revenge! Go 4chan! Go Piratebay!

  • Anon.

    @130 someone

    ACT! is an off the shelf database program designed specifically for lead generation and contact management applications. It is made by SAGE who also produce the famous SAGE accountancy package.

    The screens you see are design screens for the form templates – this allows the software to be easily modified to show different fields for example. It would be unusual for an application of this type to provide anything other than standard Windows form controls – such as those you get in the Visual Studio package.

    Source: Personal experience with ACT! (And its a load of crap!)

  • Anonymous

    Ref #125 – is anyone able to crack their phone system and forward all their incoming calls to random destinations (e.g. premium rate sex lines, Crimestoppers, rickrolls etc)?

  • carol

    You:
    “it is clear that the sole motivation of the legal action has been to generate as much money as possible”

    Him:
    “My latest wheeze is to contact schools or local authorities and offer to give talks to teenagers at schools about file sharing and why we do what we do. I would offer to do this free of charge and offer it as a service to educate young people not to file share, to prove that the work we do is not all about the money.
    What do you think? ….. It will improve our profile with the SRA, educate young people and in time reduce file sharing, which will in turn benefit the creative industries.”

    just saying

  • Anonymous

    Contact numbers for Mr Andrew J. Crossley of ACS:LAW

    Direct line at work 0203 178 6806

    Home phone number out of hours 01403 753 759

    Cellphone 07816 990073

  • O2 Access

    To #127 acs-none

    See “elcomsoft password recovery” on BT.

    Or buy it.

  • Pingback: The Content MAFIAA vs. The People (Week 38/2010, MPAA > ACTA) « indiworks

  • Jeroenz0r

    HAHAHA! They will be mad!

  • Anonymous

    @carol

    You know the whole “indoctrinating schoolkids against sharing” thing was just a scheme to throw off the SRA, right?

    He outright admitted that in the email you’re quoting from. But you editted out his admission. Why?

  • carol

    no – he lists incidental benefits from wrong-footing the SRA. Just because they’re subsidiary benefits it doesn’t therefore mean that they are not benefits.

    I’m no fan of these weasels, but many people in this thread are guilty of hysterically interpreting everything to fit their own agenda.

    No question the guy is scum. But just because he’s not all good it doesn’t mean he’s all bad.

    In before ‘shill’ accusations.

  • ccc

    “out of business ?”

    i doubt that will happen

  • Anonymous

    “No question the guy is scum. But just because he’s not all good it doesn’t mean he’s all bad.”

    True. However, the fact that he is all bad does mean that he is all bad.

  • Ninja

    Ah and they call file sharers greedy. What a fine week this will be. MAFIAA should shake in fear, the underground is rising!

  • Anonymous

    @carol

    Shill. Shilly shill shill.

    Torrentfreak said, accurately, that the sole motivation of ACS Law’s legal action is to generate as much money as possible.

    The email you quoted doesn’t contradict that, at all. It doesn’t even have anything to do with ACS Law’s legal action. The email is about brainwashing kids for free in an attempt to fool the SRA.

    Of course, you failed to quote the part where he admits that…

    So wow, there are a few incidental side “benefits” from fooling the SRA. Big whoop. They aren’t even legitimate benefits.

    But you’re attempting to use them to prove ACS Law’s extortion scheme isn’t all about money and Andy Boy is still sort of a good guy.

    Uh huh.

    The only person here guilty of interpreting things to fit their own agenda is you. Your last name wouldn’t happen to be Crossley or possibly Tsang, would it “carol”…?

  • The Sea Word

    With regards to Crossley’s SRA-baiting ‘wheeze’, the thought of a spiv like him VISITING SCHOOLS fills me with horror.
    This is a man unconcerned with human suffering. He is solely motivated with making money for himself and his clients, who DO NOT include the ‘artists’ who actually MADE the copyrighted ‘works’.
    In fact, ACS: Law takes the majority of the money made from this scam for themselves, and Crossley brags about his personal wealth as a result while thousands of innocent people are sick with confusion and fear.
    And this is simple, empirical fact. It’s all there in the leaked emails, the complaints to the SRA and to Which?, the TV reports, the questions raised in The House Of Lords…
    On the surface, Crossley in person is likely a nice-seeming guy to those who know him. He probably believes that he has the right to make a lot of money as he is putting himself in a position
    where public brickbats can be hurled at him by the filesharing community. He also doubtless believes he is ultimately doing ‘public good’.
    BUT YOU CANNOT DO PUBLIC GOOD BY CAUSING STRESS AND MISERY AND FINANCIAL HARDSHIP FOR THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE. THE ENDS DO NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS.
    Hence, the notion of a man with the moral outlook that Crossley possesses – that it’s OK to cause trouble for other people as long as you make money out of some ostensible ‘infringers’ – giving talks to children in schools is utterly vile. I personally wouldn’t want him within a hundred miles of my kids. It’s like putting a paedophile in charge of a sex education class.

  • Anonymousse

    I do hope this email leak means that ISPs will now think long and hard before handing over customer details in bulk to 3rd party law firms after seeing the shitstorm ACS:Law have now unleashed.

    I also hope the victims who have had their full personal details leaked go and ask their ISP why they passed on their personal details to this clown of a company.

  • carol

    oh wow – the main concern of a business is to make money.

    Big revelation – go go team sherlock.

    Honestly…why don’t you use some of this energy to dish out a slap to some people who are doing really serious stuff. You can start with the companies who make torture apparatus in this country to sell to questionable governments of other countries.

    But oh no – much more important to get shirty with people who stop you getting your free copy of Avatar.

    You’re as pathetic as they are.

    Insert your bleating justifications here: ____________________

  • anonymous

    @carol

    ACS Law doesn’t actually stop people from downloading they just send out letters to people demanding money. I would say the main concern of a business is to make money legitimately, not from intimidation or abusing the fact that most people that recieve the letters do not understand what they are being accused of. It’s quite clear that you are writing about a topic in which you have no idea what you’re talking about, so plz GTFO of my internet and get back in the kitchen

  • carol

    lol @ “making money legitimately”

    See my previous comment. There are umpteen nefarious uk companies that do and have done much worse than this lot, including colourful arrays of human rights abuses; but then none of that really impacts on people’s ability to download free stuff so of course it never attracts much attention.

    Bread & circuses. Simple as that.

    Pathetic.

  • The Sea Word

    @ Carol :-

    Ah, the classic self-defeating internet argument gambit! I.e. ignore the pertinent facts (due to them being unarguable) then try to shoehorn irrelevant gibberish into the debate.
    According to Occam’s Razor:-

    Andrew Crossley is a spiv lawyer.
    ACS: Law relies for the bulk of its business on speculative invoicing.
    Their methods cause fear, misery and financial hardship to many people.
    Their operation should be stopped.
    What other evil people do and how to stop them is irrelevant to this subject.

    Now, you can reply:-
    ‘Oh great, now tell that to the people who are being mutilated by torturers! You make me sick – all you can think about is trying to scupper small businesses when you could be making efforts to stop the REAL bad guys. How sad and selfish you are!’

    Then, I could reply:-
    ‘Carol, all this is irrelevant emotional string-pulling designed to divert attention from the facts of the matter, for whatever (possibly trollish) reason you might have. Do you seriously think that so many people DON’T want to see an end to ALL human suffering? What the individual or groups can do varies from subject to subject. We could compare all the evil people in the world to Andrew Crossley and judge how much worse they are than he is and how people don’t do enough to stop them by comparison… it’s NOT an argument, just wordsmithing and pointscoring.’

    And then you could reply…

    …actually I’m bored now. But hopefully you get the picture.

  • Whatever

    I was wondering when the neocons would appear.

  • FuzzyX

    Well carol there may be many wrongs in this world but before anyone can save the planet they have to start in their own backyard.

    Then most people are quite happy with their ‘stuff’ and seek no further claim.

    Most people here are not affected by these developments when we can handle ourselves and adapt, but such an attack and exploitation of the innocent is a valid concern.

    As to me. I watched Avatar 3D extended version in the cinema, I purchased the Avatar DVD and I downloaded it via BT and TPB.

    A crime of availability and convenience. So sue me if you care that much.

  • carol

    Butthurt pirates lol

    Learn2adult

    Spastics

  • jack

    DigiProtect Accounts & Passwords
    courtesy of Terrence Tsang.
    http://www.pastebay.org/105681

  • jack

    Miller trying to force a woman into paying £25 month for something her 11 year old daughter downloaded. 18/9/2009
    http://www.pastebay.org/105682

  • Andrew ReallyCrossley

    Anyone know what these passwords are for?

    http://www.pastebay.org/105683

  • jack

    “work ethic” memorandum circulated by Terrence Tsang to this co-workers 7/10/2009.
    Note “I am conscious about the productivity of the office lately. The
    business depends on sufficient amounts of letters going out to alleged
    infringers,”

    The business depends on sufficient amounts of letters going out. Business eh ? Perhaps because their licence to collect debt expired in 2008 we should call it a racket rather than business.
    http://www.pastebay.org/105684

  • jack

    Miller checking out a list of porn movies.
    http://www.pastebay.org/105685

  • jack

    Miller trying to get hold of some software without being licensed to use it.
    http://www.pastebay.org/105686

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105687

    Email from 05/11/2009 titled “Writing To Solicitors” from Rob Heelas about how to avoid getting into trouble with the SRA (too late now Rob!)

  • UFOs

    “Miller trying to get hold of some software without being licensed to use it.
    http://www.pastebay.org/105686

    what a distorted reading of that email.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105688
    Email titled “security letters” from Heelas to his fellow paralegals discussing putting extra pressure on those who those who so far they have not “dropped to settle”.
    As with all this scam, settlement and payments is the only thing ACS:LAW are seeking, never any attempt to argue their case in court.

  • loads of these

    Dear Madam

    Infringement of Copyright

    We refer to previous correspondence regarding infringement of our client’s copyright in ‘Cluster Fuck’ (“the Work”).

    Our evidence shows that the Work was made available on one or more peer-to-peer (“P2P”) networks using the ‘Bittorent’ protocol from an IP address which your internet service provider has confirmed is connected with you. The evidence shows that the Work was made available for upload from that IP address (i.e. using your internet connection). In order for that to be the case, the work was being made available using your internet connection to any users logged on to the same P2P network at that time (‘concurrent users’), as a result of having been either:

    1)downloaded using your IP address and during the download, the P2P client software may have made those parts downloaded immediately available to other concurrent users; or

    2)previously downloaded to the ‘shared files’ folder (or similar) of such software, which the software then made the work automatically available to other concurrent users.

    You state you were away from your computer at the time of alleged infringement. This does not necessarily mean that the act complained of did not take place, since an infringement can occur in the following scenarios:

    (a) if your computer is connected to a peer to peer network and is running a file sharing program; it does not need user input, as long as the computer is on and connected to the internet; or

    (b)if you have a router (wired or wireless) connected to the internet and it, or your computer, is used by a third party.

    In the circumstances, unless you are able to provide a satisfactory explanation as to why you are not liable for the acts alleged against you and/or we receive your written undertaking and payment of £495.00 within the next fourteen days, we shall have no alternative but to take our client’s instructions with a view to commencing proceedings against you.
    In the meantime, we expressly reserve all our client’s rights.

    Yours faithfully

  • lawyers
  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105689

    Terrence Tsang invites you to join his fantasy football team the “ACS Pirates” – yes seriously and he’s even given you his personal gmail address.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105690

    Adam Glen 29/7/2009 discussing situations where the “cheerleader defence” is used when a third party did the downloading.

  • don’t worry, i’m from the internet

    LOL love this prank call:

    http://soundcloud.com/kan3/prank5

  • Andrews new home??

    A distinguished Victorian country house set in private grounds of 23 acres, with swimming
    pool, tennis court, mature gardens, parkland and woodland
    14 bedrooms
    6 reception rooms
    7 bathrooms
    Swimming pool/tennis court
    Secluded country residence
    Available from 1/9/2010 (Flexible
    Furnishings)
    £10,000 per month

  • jack

    4/11/2009.
    Re: Apology letter to Debenhams Ottwaway Solicitors (re: Andrew Patterson)
    http://www.pastebay.org/105692

    Corssley forced to issue an apology and drop a case & wasn’t very happy about it.

    Apology on Crossley’s headed note paper.
    http://www.pastebay.org/105693

  • Blondie
  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105694

    Email from 21/7/2010, one of the new recruits to ACS:LAW trying to keep her name out of the SRA investigation.

    Too late now for Emma-Jane Sleator-Rollinson

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105695

    Breakdown of business of Capturing IP Addresses For Copyright Infringement from email dated 02/07/2010,
    including terms such as ” no liability if unsuccessful”
    and financial breakdown of;
    12.5% Technology Partner / Web Monitoring

    15% Media CAT Ltd

    20% Copyright Owner

    52.5% ACS Law

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105697

    07/06/2010 Crossley’s cheque for his office rental bounced.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105698
    email dated 28/05/2010 titled “Re: Overdue invoices” Crossley slow with payments to creditors again.

  • £500,000 fine
  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105700

    Email dated 18/05/2010 and tilted “Re: – Notification of Infringement of Copyright – Andres Gunnar Ballinas-Olsson & Others – ‘Fever’ – (Evidenzia Phase 2) – BT & Plusnet; Media C.A.T Limited (Phase 3) – BT & PlusNet

    ACS & BT discussing terms and doing a deal. Unfortunately the scanned documents from BT are not present.

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=KPMG.pdf

    The file above is for the attention of KPMG LLP, Advisory, 20 Farringdon Street, London EC4A 4PP.
    Its a PDF fax marked Private and Confidential to Crossley and concerns your client Gerald Martin Smith.
    I wonder if this counts as a breach of data security legislation by ACS:LAW

  • Nice one Jack

    Good work fella!

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105701
    Email dated 3/5/2010 titled “Re Slyck”

    Seems that Tsang’s departure from ACS was a feint, they’re still in contact & working together. Crossley asks Tsang for help with excel spreadsheets to connect IPs with Postcodes and avoid paying Ali £1 per IP address imported.

  • Anonymous

    @carol

    You are DEFINITELY an apologist for Andrew Crossley.

    “Andy isn’t the bad guy! The REAL bad guys are torture device manufacturers!”

    Your attempted defence of him is so desperate, grasping, and vacuous that I actually feel sorry for you. Are you possibly his girlfriend or boyfriend?

    In that case I’d feel triply sorry for you.

    See, it doesn’t matter what crimes other people commit because they have zero bearing on Andy’s own crimes. Just because other people out there might be bigger crooks than Andy is doesn’t take away from the fact that he’s still a total goddamn crook.

    Imagine if a defense lawyer tried to use your fallacious logic?

    “Sure, my client is a double murderer… But he’s NOTHING compared to Ghengis Khan! You shouldn’t even bother convicting him, your Honor, when there are much bigger fish to fry! Like war criminals or Mongol hordes! Why, if this court wastes one more SECOND on on this FRIVOLOUS case then IT’S A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE I SAY!”

    They’d be laughed right out of the courtroom, kind like the way you’re being laughed right out of Torrentfreak.

    BTW, I like how you totally backpeddled. First you were all “Andy’s extortion scheme isn’t completely about money!”, then you were all “Yeah, Andy’s extortion scheme is completely about money. But so what? All businesses are about making money! Who cares if ACS is doing it illegally!? How can you people even be discussing Andy when there are SATANIC CULTS AND CHILDKILLERS LURKING ABOUT! Surely they’re more deserving of your ire!!”.

    You are so obvious it pains me.

    Oh, and you think maybe the reason we’re ripping on Andy instead of torture device manufacturers is because the latter isn’t relevent subject matter on a NEWS BLOG ABOUT FILESHARING, YOU HUMONGOUS IDIOT?

    Please excuse us for staying on-topic.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105702
    Correspondence between Crossley and his QC about the SRA investigation.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105703
    Crossley’s QC advises him to adjust his disbursement costs which are to be presented to the SRA.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105704

    Here’s one for the toothless SRA, Crossley boasts that his QC wrote the rules.
    “He is Andrew Hopper QC and he literally wrote the sra rules!”

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105707

    Crossley discusses terms with Alireza Torabi to use his software system to deal with data from 1,000 Sky customers.
    I wonder what Crossley actually put through his accounts ? Presumably the HMRC will find out.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105709
    Email from steveafcb@yahoo.co.uk aka Steve Elsworth, subject; speculative invoice m2lo10825172

    Mr Elsworth informs Mr Crossley that the IP used to speculatively invoice a certain mr colin hollie is a location some 400 miles north of his home address.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105712

    Crossley himself gets fined by Westminster Council for rubbish outside his offices.
    Guess what ? Crossley doesn’t like it himself.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105713
    Crossley tries to lean on Westminster Council to drop the fixed penalty charge for litter outside his office.
    “I am a solicitor”

  • Disgusted

    Disgusting

  • keep spamming the press

    @Jack – thanks for putting this info online

    I am forwarding them all to as many news outlets as I can find.

    This must break into the mainstream media…

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105716

    Mr Mohammed Kahn’s letter of 13th April 2010 to Mr Cossley. Mr Kahn appears to be a Sky customer.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105717
    Correspondence from Mr Richard Glover on 10/04/2020 about offering to pay a fine because of content on his son’s computer.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105718
    Email subject “Intellectual Litigator Vacancy” date 9/04/2010

    Job enquiry, Andy aland@law-staff.co.uk would like to join Andrew.

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=1175418356.pdf

    This one is for Lawdit Solicitors, Southampton Office, No.1 Brunswick Place, Southampton, SO15 2AN.
    It’s a fax dated 31st March 2010 to Mr Crossley concerning your client P. Connolly.
    I’d recoomend everyone to download this pdf because Lawdit are standing up to Crossley and the methods he uses. They challenge the fact that Crossley has send out identical demands to their clients and they are thereby irrelevant.
    I wonder how Lawdit feel about their confidential faxes being leaked by ACS:LAW.

  • Pingback: [tf] anti-piracy cash scheme leaked by email - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105719
    Dated 30/03/2010.

    Oh dear Entanet, was Crossley slow in paying you for your customer’s details ? Another ISP taking Crossley’s silver. Perhaps your customer’s won’t appreciate you making money from selling their private data.

    Crossley was slow paying and Entanet were tired of waiting.
    “We WILL NOT be supplying any further information and WILL proceed with county court action to obtain the debt for the amount of £3720.00.

    The first outstanding invoice is for information supplied in July 2009 some 8 months ago.”

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=OP_I380793_1_.pdf

    Oh dear Entanet, you’ve really let things slip here. Just in case any of your customers are in doubt that you are profiting from selling their private date to ACS:LAW here’s the invoice you sent on 12th January 2010.

    “Charges for the provision of personal data per IP address” And £20 a time I see – really ? Glad I’m not one of your customers.

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=992182758.pdf

    You must download this one ! it’s a classic.
    It’s fax on Worcestershire NHS Mental health Partnership Trust headed paper dated 10th March 2010.
    The fax is by Victoria Lovett on behalf of Marion Glenn.
    Ms Lovett is a case worker and Ms Glenn is a patient.
    Ms Glen claims to be computer illiterate, already in substantial debt and needing the help of her case worker to write the letter.

    So Crossley’s speculative invoicing even applies to the recipients of mental health care. Pretty low even for Crossley’s standards.

  • Thinker

    The shit storm begins!!!!

    1 hour ago:

    Privacy International (PI) has announced that it is planning legal action against controversial solicitors ACS: Law Solicitors (ACS Law), alleging a breach of the Data Protection Act (DPA).

    ACS Law, which is already under fire for sending letters to people alleged of copyright infringement, had its website hit by a denial of service (DoS) attack last Tuesday.

    The firm quickly suspended the site, but soon afterwards a file alleged to contain an archive of the firm’s email was uploaded to file sharing websites.
    Advertisement

    PI said this has led to the exposure of personal information of around 10,000 people alleged to have been involved in illegal file sharing.

    PI’s Alexander Hanff said: “This data breach is likely to result in significant harm to tens of thousands of people in the form of fraud, identity theft and severe emotional distress … and now it has placed thousands of innocent people at risk.”

    He said PI had briefed the Information Commisioner’s Office and is urging ACS Law to contact every person who is mentioned in the email archive to disclose the breach.

    In a statement the ICO said:”“The ICO takes all breaches of the Data Protection Act (DPA) very seriously. Any organisation processing personal data must ensure that it is kept safe and secure.

    “This is an important principle of the Act. The ICO will be contacting ACS:Law to establish further facts of the case and to identify what action, if any, needs to be taken.”

    ACS Law’s Andrew Crossley said that he was not prepared to comment for legal reasons.

    Source http://www.computeractive.co.uk/computeractive/news/2270466/privacy-international-launching

  • BBC at last

    BBC Tech is looking for info, it seems:

    http://twitter.com/ruskin147/status/25671377626

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=933119857.pdf

    Lawdit Southampton Office again doing some sterling work on behalf of their clients. Pointing out the weakness of the ACS case regarding IP addresses and tell Crossley never to contact their client directly again.
    If you need to reply to a speculative invoice from Crossley this is well worth reading to glean some useful information in your defence.
    Presumably Lawdit are going to lose some business now because of ACS:LAW leaking their case argument strategy. Who needs lawyers ? Read this and knock up your own version.

  • Pingback: Un chasseur de pirate… piraté ! «

  • Andrew Verycrossley

    This is what O2 charged to give up their customers info with out attempting to challenge the NPO:-

    Johnston, Richard [Richard.Johnston@bakermckenzie.com] Mon 17/05/2010 10:59

    LONACC-#214787-v1-1130538_-_TELEFONICA_O2_UK_LTD_-_Media_Cat.TIF>>
    Statement of Account as at : 30 March 2010

    Client no. 39001813
    Name 02 UK LTD

    Bill No. Bill Date Matter Description Amount Due
    1126965 16/12/2009 39001813-000032 DigiProtect £1,868.75
    1128416 15/01/2010 39001813-000032 DigiProtect £1,232.58
    1130537 18/02/2010 39001813-000032 DigiProtect £972.90
    1130538 18/02/2010 39001813-000036 Media CAT £511.13

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=Microsoft_Word___acs_resp_080210_1.pdf

    This one is another efax from a company owner in Devon,
    Retreat Boatyard
    Simon Reader
    Managing Director
    Retreat Drive
    Topsham
    Exeter EX3 0LS
    01392874720 ext 12
    07715705203

    Regarding a speculative invoice to someone who does not work for the company. “As far as I am aware there is no law in the UK for which you can properly hold the
    addressee, the company, or myself responsible for an infringement occurring via my
    Internet connection. If this is not the case then I would be interested to hear your legal
    basis for attempting to do so.”

    Perhaps Mr Reader won’t appreciate his confidential documents being leaked on to the net by ACS:LAW.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105724

    Crossley –

    Rose is leaving today. Tell her. She has made too many mistakes and left me seriously exposed

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105725

    Email from Miller to Crossley, dated 08/06/2010 08:56 Sunject; Envelopes.

    Miller is organising 8,000 envelopes for their next round of speculative invoicing. 8,000 yes really.

  • asc-none

    I recommend that people cross reference the names on the SKY evidenzia list with those in the phone book and start ringing people up to tell them that their info has been leaked! I has spoke to a woman already in Glasgow who said it nearly tore her family apart. She is now going to a solicitor and watchdog over her info being leaked.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105728
    Also 5.3 MB xls file at;
    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=Copy_of_03_06_10.xls

    Email dated 09/06/2010
    Subject; RE: Lastest Server Based Evidenzia & Mediacat Spreadshhets

    Huge db of IP addresses.

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105731
    Miller’s Cartridge Save account.
    Do you think they need a container load of ink ?

  • UFOs

    “Any of the pranksters want to call Crossley on Skype ?”

    that’s such an incredibly lame thing to do

  • Rosalind

    Finally up on BBC News website
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11418962

  • jack

    http://www.pastebay.org/105733
    And pdf’s with BT’s terms at;
    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=Scan001.pdf
    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=Scan001_2.pdf

    Subject; FW: – Notification of Infringement of Copyright – Andres Gunnar Ballinas-Olsson & Others – ‘Fever’ – (Evidenzia Phase 2) – BT & Plusnet; Media C.A.T Limited (Phase 3) – BT & PlusNet
    Date;18/05/2010

    BT’s dirty dealing with ACS:LAW. I have uploaded the text before but the BT scanned documents were missing.
    No longer missing however, just found them on another email.

  • AtWork

    @ Rosalind – shame it gives the impression that the list was “obtained” rather than explaining how it was actually posted by ACS for all to see

  • lol

    Wow im so glad there done with.. what criminals.

    4Chan – Anonymous are heroes and they should be given a medal.

    Yes im completely serious. They have done more than the government and the police force combined in just a few days.. how pathetic.

    Win all the way around, bye bye Andrew.. you just got owned by the internet.

    Whos next to challenge the internet? No one has ever won, and no one ever will.

  • wow

    Wow how is prank calling CROSSLEY a lame thing to do?

    You really dont get what he did and what he was about to do if this continued..

    Thieving from thousands of innocent people.. vs calling him and telling him what kind of wanker he is..

    seriously, grow a dick and then f*ck yourself. I will call him every day for the next 10 years and it still wouldn’t be enough.

    The guy deserves to rot in jail for the rest of his miserable f*cking life, he is scum.

  • Rosalind

    @at work – yes, I think that’s one of the main things that needs to be established\made clear.

  • m0r1arty

    @Rosalind 127

    Thanks for posting that – I’ve been waiting all weekend for a decent news source to run with it.

    Let’s hope it gets picked up now and finds it’s way to the minds that wouldn’t have otherwise known about it.

    Great work all around guys – this is the shizz in the nizz!

  • FuzzyX
  • Rosalind
  • UFOs

    You’re intensely juvenile, then

  • jack
  • m0r1arty

    @215 UFOs

    Who is ‘intensely juvenile’ and why?

    We are talking about playing someone else’s records or films here and them stomping their feet because they don’t know what a library is – aren’t we?

  • anonym0us

    “In relation to the individual names, these are just the names and addresses of the account owner and we make no claims that they themselves were sharing the files,” he [Crossley] added.

    Brilliant!

  • Pingback: Anti-Piracy Law Firm Suffers E-Mail Leak: Video «

  • anon E mouse

    A round of applause for 157 The Sea Word.

    Well said, sir.

  • Anon

    I have found all the emails available to read here, bit slow though, and sometimes it just dies, but they’re all there.

    http://ueof.co.uk/acslaw/

  • Marc

    “please pass on link to this infomation to every newpaper, tv channel, IT magazine, consumer rights magazine you can find.

    Thankyou

    Will do.

  • Pingback: ?????? ???????? ? ???????? ???? ???? ???? ! | ?????? Geek

  • Morlock

    From:zoe.wood@entagroup.com
    Subject:RE:Payment Required
    To:info@acs-law.co.uk
    22/03/10 09:47

    County Court action will now commence due to non payment and we will not be in a position to supply any further information on request.

    This is totally unacceptable.

    Kind Regards

    Zoe Wood

    —————————————————————

    From: Zoe Wood [mailto:zoe.wood@entagroup.com]
    Sent: 17 March 2010 11:51
    To: ‘info@acs-law.co.uk’
    Subject: Payment Required

    Hi,

    Could you please confirm whether the outstanding amount of £4237.00 was paid on Monday 15th March 2010 as suggested in your e-mail last week.

    Thanks

    Kind Regards

    Zoe Wood

  • In Awe

    Here is Terence Tsang’s twitter name Tezimondo

  • AN other

    Here is his Linkedin Profile,

    http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-crossley/9/610/777

    what a bullshitter

  • From the riddler

    What is it that no man wants to have yet no man wants to lose?

    A Lawsuit

    I think there are a few coming your way Crossley

  • jack

    Email dated 15/12/2009 from Glen to Miller.
    Jonathan

    Approved with modification

    I am exceptionally unhappy with the wording:

    “since you are the account holder of the internet connection associated with IP address 86.133.46.196, as confirmed by your ISP, British Telecommunications (BT), and are therefore responsible for any and all activities that occur over your internet connection including the infringement of copyright in our client’s Work.”

    There is NO case law to support such a general assertion without physical evidence on the infringer’s computer and ALL case law points to the opposite interpretation of that statement. As the lack of this statement does not materially affect the letter I have removed.

    I also note that there has been no apology for the delay in responding to the infringer. I have added that.

    The infringer makes no admission only that her son may have downloaded but that she cannot know without contacting him as he is in the USA. Changed “admission” to “statement”.

    There is also no record of our having corresponded with her on the 2nd September so have removed that reference.

    Regards

    Adam

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=SRA_Letter.pdf
    Email dated 23/8/2010

    SRA Letter.

    This is the notification by the SRA to Crossley that he must appear before a Solicitor’s Disciplinary Tribunal.

  • wiggler

    “To pay for Skype credit using the PayPal option in the Skype payments
    option, insert the following account details:

    Email: jmiller@acs-law.co.uk
    Pass: ajc123qweasd

    Andrew’s Visa Debit card details are stored here now so more credit can be easily added in future.

    Jonathan Miller “

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=Allan_Kopie_and_Others_Phase_1_Master_Complete.xls

    Email dated 20/08/2010

    This is BT handing over a database with approx 400 IPs and Names, Addresses and Postcodes. I,ve seen comments that some of the dbs are just lists of IPs and indeed they are, but this one is names and addresses too. Scroll the spreadsheet to the right to see all the names and addresses. Top of the list is Mr Angus McMillan from Cumbria.

    Dear Sirs,

    In accordance with the Court’s Order of 17 February 2010 (“the Order”), please find enclosed the data in accordance with paragraph 1 of the Order.

    Please acknowledge safe receipt and that the data will be held securely and shall be used only in accordance with the provisions of the Order. Where any data is not available this has been highlighted.

    Regards,

    Prakash Mistry
    BT Legal | tel: 0207 356 2681 | mob: 07715013552 | email: prakash.mistry@bt.com

    This email contains BT information, which may be privileged or confidential.
    It’s meant only for the individual(s) or entity named above. If you’re not the intended
    recipient, note that disclosing, copying, distributing or using this information
    is prohibited. If you’ve received this email in error, please let me know immediately
    on the email address above. Thank you.

  • jack

    Re #231

    Check BT’s request that the data will be held in a secure location. That’s a fail by ACS:LAW then.

    “Please acknowledge safe receipt and that the data will be held securely and shall be used only in accordance with the provisions of the Order. Where any data is not available this has been highlighted.”

  • jack

    Email Dated 20/08/2010
    Subject; Professional Conduct.

    Our ref: REG/47713-2010
    Your ref:

    STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
    To be opened by addressee only
    Mr Andrew Crossley
    ACS Law

    DX 44643 Mayfair

    20 August 2010

    Dear Mr Crossley

    Casework Investigations and Operations Report dated 6 May 2010

    I attach a copy of the decision made by the Authorised Officer on 18 August 2010. The Authorised Officer has decided that the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal is the appropriate forum for the consideration of this matter. Further details about the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal can be found on our website at:

    http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/enforcement/intervention-tribunal/solicitors-disciplinary-tribunal.page.

    This link explains the tests that we apply in deciding to refer a matter to the SDT and what will happen during the disciplinary proceedings.

    As this matter has been referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, please note that there is no right of appeal and that no costs direction has been made at this stage.

    Please note that the decision to refer your conduct to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal may also be published on the SRA’s website once the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal has certified there is a case to answer. Publication is made in accordance with our Policy Statement. Our Policy Statement can be found on our website (www.sra.org.uk).

    My file will now be referred to our Legal Directorate to institute the formal disciplinary proceedings. A member of staff from that department will contact you shortly.

    Thank you for your assistance and co-operation in dealing with this matter.

    Yours sincerely

    Ian Roberts
    Investigation Officer
    Casework Investigations and Operations

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=Samsung_SCX_20100820124438.pdf

    Fax dated 20/08/2010.
    Subject; Your Report about Dr Deborah Prince.

    More contact to Crossley from the SRA about the article in Which.

  • Anon

    cant believe the houses this guy was looking at £8000 a month 09/08/2010 @11:39

  • Pingback: Gang Stalking World » Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme

  • anonymouse

    Does Andrew Crossley have malpractice insurance? If so, will it cover lawsuits in regards to the leaks of peoples identity and credit card information should he get sued?

    If he does get sued and he does carry insurance and they do pay out will not his premiums be incredibly high?

  • Anonymouse

    I was reading a paste page where an employee by the name of Susan was dismissed for leaving him exposed.
    Exposed to what?

    Another poster quoted an email that an employee that was dismissed for ambigous reasons.

    Has anyone made a connection if these are one and the same?

  • A Law Student Writes

    Mr Crossley, brace yourself to be BONED BY LAW, because …

    the ‘speculative invoicing’ scam crucially depends upon a mechanism known in legalese as a Norwich Pharmacal order for pre-trial discovery against third-party facilitators — whereas the general rule is that only people who are actually named as parties to existing litigation can be obliged to disclose documents etc. relevant to the claims, this caselaw provides for “an equitable and exceptional order granted to assist with the administration of justice where discovery is absolutely necessary in order to enable a party to proceed with a bona fide claim”.

    This essentially entails a solicitor named, for example, Andrew Crossley appearing unopposed (ex parte) in a civil Court and asking it to exercise an inherent jurisdiction to compel a third party, alleged to be the only practicable source of information identifying a potential defendant, to provide these details to the plaintiff, his client, so that a civil legal action, here presumably to recover damages for the tort of copyright infringement, can be commenced.

    Such requests seem to have succeeded based on a mere smattering of superficially supportive but untested evidence, as it would be presumed a more rigourous scrutiny will happen at a later stage in the fully contested lawsuit.

    This is apparently how Crossley has, at no cost more the time taken to turn up, procured court orders obliging ISP’s to divulge in bulk their clients’ personal details, based solely upon the IP address and corresponding timestamp ‘evidence’ his accomplices dredged up from public P2P torrent swarms.

    The mass exploitation of thusly disclosed information for ample profit from the vulnerable and defenseless quickly followed.

    Happily though, there’s a fatal snag or two in the drive-chain of this cozy, colour-of-law convenience conveyor:

    1. If the above-mentioned solicitor actually intended to never proceed into court with a full-blown tort action in respect of any of the alleged infringements upon which his various NPO applications were premised, then the essential good faith (bona fides) requirement was missing in action and he was on each occasion in fact committing a fraud upon the Court and obtaining its Orders by false pretenses, effectively abusing its powers to further a highly lucrative private information fishing expedition, not the cause of justice.

    2. In ex parte proceedings the onus is on the moving party to make full and frank disclosure of all relevant facts and law, including those that may be adverse to his interests. Failure to do so can result in any order so obtained being later set aside. It seems highly unlikely Crossley fairly represented to the Court how the negative ramifications for end-users’ right to privacy protected under ECHR, Art.8, their reasonable expectations of confidentiality and the substantial public interest in preventing innocent persons being targeted should all be weighed up against the interests of his clients to recover, or that he accurately represented the extent of damages involved, or the logically frail constructs upon which he intended to rely to eventually prove them in court.

    Crossley’s lack of genuine intent to proceed should be fairly trivial to demonstrate from the total absence of any related subsequent court records, as he would need to have lodged the (completely separate) papers to state a claim for damages against the alleged infringer in the case of at least one of the persons named through his multiple NPO applications.

    This he will almost certainly have failed to do, as incurring the considerable Court Fees, payable per individual case at that stage to commence potentially expensive litigation against identified parties who might actually defend themselves, was never part of the business plan and hence will have been omitted as ‘unnecessary waste’. [NB: Don't bother rushing to do it 'retroactively', now that the cat is out of the bag, dummy ";0)] Naturally, the email trail neatly verifies that this was never contemplated nor worked upon, even in the large proportion (~70%) of cases where identified alleged infringers failed to react submissively or at all to his menacing letters.

    Now, in light of the above two points, consider an interesting and rather fundamental principle of the so-called ‘Justice System’ in common law countries — that solicitors are held to be ‘Officers of the Court’ whose primary professional duty is to NEVER mislead it under any circumstance whatsoever.

    While this elastic ethic of course allows some leeway for beating about the bush in time-honoured fashion by prefacing each dubious utterance with ‘my client this’ or ‘my client that’, if breached a bit too blatantly it begins to reflect badly upon the system itself, tending to bring the whole caboodle and all its ‘players’ into public disrepute.

    As such, there is understandably nothing the Old Beak, when snapped to attention by mass public exposure, takes more personally, nor hammers with more aggressive relish, than a duplicitous solicitor caught out self-interestedly lying in the face of his Court (in facie curie). In sporting terminology, this caper is about as rash as sticking your head in a lion’s mouth and flicking his love-spuds with a wet towel – Bamm!

    One formal way to hammer such deviant characters flatter than a Wienerschnitzel is via a prosecution for ‘Criminal Contempt of Court’, which in England’s Crown Court carries up to two years of obsessively trying to avoid dropping the soap in the showers of the ‘Big House’. Such proceedings can arise by the Court’s own motion or on the basis of an ordinary criminal complaint.

    On the civil front, a decent law firm might take a day in court to demonstrate that ACS:Law wrongfully obtained the NPOs, thus invalid and unlawful from the outset (void ab initio) and therefore, in a class action suit, deservedly recover in damages all the cash ACS:Law illicitly raked in and redistribute it to the victims.

    That could, in turn, lead to Mr Crossley being nicely opened up to further criminal charges for having used court orders he had reason to believe were void for the purposes of fraud / extortion of monies.

    Various actions for defamation and breaches of the Data Protection Act, privacy, confidentiality and contract also beckon alluringly.

    All things considered, it seems Mr Crossley’s path to personal bankruptcy, expulsion from the legal profession and/or jail is clearly paved by his own amazing prowess.

    Cheers, Andrew, here’s looking at you, babe!

    ——–
    Sources:

    Norwich Pharmacal v. Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] A.C. 133

    House of Lords in Ashworth Hospital Authority v MGN Ltd [2002]

    Smith v ADVFN PLC [2008] EWCA

    R (Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048

    European Convention on Human Rights

    Fraud Act 2006

  • Tack

    @125 – Sep 26, 2010 at 21:23 by Anonymous

    Is there a law fund in the UK to bail out people that have been caused harm by law firms that can no longer pay?

    Yes, the Law Society can be sued for the damages caused by its bankrupt solicitor members.

  • payback

    @ by A Law Student Writes

    Bravo that is one of the most interesting and funniest things I have ever read. I am still laughing now about the lion’s mouth comment. Hopefully you won’t be a student for long. I have a great idea for your first case, See there’s this guy who keeps sending me threating letters………….

    PS I hope you don’t mind but I have posted it on Slyck

  • FuzzyX

    Gee #239 “A Law Student” that was one hell of a posting and thanks for the info.

    It seems to me that the legal system will soon clean its own house with the help of other interested organizations.

    So hopefully this bad scheme is quickly shut down and then a few large concerns are added into the pending DEA.

  • British tangent.

    The BBC are reporting it now,just heard it on 6am breakfast bbc1,good stuff.

  • PaulB NYC

    This extortion racket has been SO difficult to expose–to the Judicial System, The Lawyers who would normally champion taking on abuses of the system and to the Press.

    They have just taken the stance that file sharing is illegal and that’s as much as they want to know.

    I’ve seen, in the gay community, where young people have been threatened with being outed at work, and at home if they DON’T pay up for downloading some badly produced gay pornography.

    It’s the young (a lot of students) and inexperienced and the older folks not particularly computer literate who are the easiest and most vulnerable targets.

    4chan has really stepped up to the plate and hit the ball out of the park on this one! KUDOS!

  • Anonymous

    A nice quote here.

    Fundamentally, this infringer claims a secure wireless network so should be considered for court although their honesty worries me.

    Adam

  • Milo
  • Legolash2o

    Its finally on BBC News, watching it now.

  • Legolash2o

    I means BBC news as in Sky Channel 503 not the internet :P

  • A Law Student Writes

    @ Payback – PS I hope you don’t mind but I have posted it on Slyck

    LOLz, you did me a favour there, mate, as I wanted to post it on Slyck also to up the chances of inspiring action, but was too fagged out at that point to bother registering. So thanks for that and the kind sentiment!

  • FunderChuck

    I think Mr Crossley now appreciates how it feels to have over 9000 penises crammed in his ass all at once and eagerly competing to probe out his most secret places.

    Ho ho, LULzy LawFag, buckle in and enjoy the ride(ing)!

  • FunderChuck

    I think Mr Crossley now appreciates how it feels to have over 9000 p3nis3s crammed in his @ss all at once and eagerly competing to probe out his most secret places.

    Ho ho, LULzy LawFag, buckle in and enjoy the ride(ing)!

  • jack

    Email dated 18/8/2010
    Tsang to Crossley.
    Tsang is supposedly working for another company, but clearly still involved with Crossley’s racket. Tsang is trying to push Ali out of the equation……

    No surprises there with Ali! I think you will have to stomach one more court order with him so I suppose just put up with it and keep him sweet for now.

    I know precisely what Adam is talking about (for once! haha), it sounds like he may be trying to replicate the damages calculation we did at DL. If he could provide me with a list of information he wants with each data delivery, I will ensure it is captured for litigation purposes.

    T.

    On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Andrew Crossley wrote:

    Terence, Thank you, we are stiull having problems with Ali who is simply not giving us the information that we need.

    As to patrick’s data, Adam has a number of important and searching questions over the information captured, such as packet details and swarm sizes etc. This latter issue has become important on the issue of damages.

    Regards

    Andrew

  • Anonxmous

    http://pastebin.com/U2DaM2hX
    http://pastebin.com/kL7EWDci

    Some consolidated, deduped data from the recent Sky and Plusnet spreadsheets.

    Just in case anyone feels like doing a maildrop. Perhaps even some bottom dwelling legal types who are fractionally less evil than ACS:Law and see some potential profit in a class action?

  • jack

    Email dated 17/8/2010.
    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=fax_081710_1624.pdf

    Andrew is representing someone with offshore interests.

    Hi Andrew

    Thanks for this. I would really like to hold out for £40k. I really don’t have the money as you know and this will be a major burden on me but one I do want to honour.

    As for the Cayman Islands – this is obviously not me! I have never set foot on the islands. I do not use the domain name and a distant cousin of mine used it once and they have since taken that site down and now have some other holding page up there for sports management with no location! Bottom line – it is not mine and I simply do not have the money.

    I am also unable to offer any security that they have asked for. I maintain I will consider the agreement but it has to be realistic with a prospect of me being able to repay it. There is no point in me agreeing to something I couldn’t really maintain. Could you hint that the alternative is me going bust and they would then achieve nothing? I defer to your better judgement Andrew.

    I am back later this week and will be in a better position to deal with this.

    Thanks

    Daniel

    —–Original Message—–
    From: “Andrew Crossley” [andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk]
    Date: 08/17/2010 05:07 PM
    To: daniel@salmassian.com
    Subject: Re: FW: 2 page document from

    Note: Original message sent as attachment

    0riginal_message
    Subject:
    FW: 2 page document from
    From:
    Andrew Crossley
    Date:
    Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:06:52 +0100
    To:

    Daniel

    Please see attached. I recommend you accept the offer contained. Please also assist me with the last paragraph of his letter, as he seems to think you are Mr Moneybags from the Cayman Islands…

    Regards

    Andrew
    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors
    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    DX: 44643 MAYFAIR
    http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7898 0571
    Fax: 020 7898 0572
    Mob: 07816 990073

    ACS Law Solicitors is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No.513065. Service of proceedings by e-mail is not accepted.
    This e-mail is confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received this mail in error, we put you on notice of its status,
    please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person; to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for your co-operation. If you have any queries please contact us on 020 7898 0571.
    ACS Law Solicitors is the trading style of Andrew J. Crossley, Sole Principal

    —— Forwarded Message
    From: Fax2Mail Powered by Premiere Global Services
    Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:24:06 +0100 (BST)
    To: Andrew Crossley
    Subject: 2 page document from

    You have received a document.

    Sender’s Name: Via Fax
    Sender’s Caller ID:
    Date/Time: Tue 17 Aug 2010 16:24:02 BST
    Number of Pages: 2
    To reprocess this document, click here

  • voiptopper

    ACS:Law could face £500,000 fine for porn list leak

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11418970

  • Andrew Verycrossley

    Christopher Graham the UK Information Commissioner on the BBC re ACS-Law breach
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7JdiS0Gw0Y

  • jack

    The posts above which are awaiting moderation detail Crossley acting for someone with offshore interests who themselves are accused of copyright infringement and are offering to setle for £40,000.
    Email dated 17/8/2010 from Mr Salmassian in Crossely’s account.

  • jack

    UK Resident? Need to Complain ?
    http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/data_protection.aspx

    Make your complaint
    Please note: some of our online complaints forms are undergoing development. In the meantime, please choose from the following options.

    By email: If all your supporting evidence is available electronically, you can send your form via email by taking the following steps.

    Data Protection Act complaint form (Word version)
    1. Complete and save the form to your computer.
    2. Open a new email, with ‘Complaint to the ICO’ in the subject line.
    3. Attach this form and any other documents you wish to send us.
    4. Send to casework@ico.gsi.gov.uk

    By post: If your supporting evidence is in hard copy, you can print out the form and post it to us with your supporting evidence.

    Data Protection Act complaint form (Word version)
    Send to:
    First Contact Team
    Information Commissioner’s Office
    Wycliffe House
    Water Lane
    Wilmslow
    SK9 5AF

  • jack

    http://www.yourfilehost.com/media.php?cat=other&file=Copy_of_03_06_10.xls

    This 5.3 MB db does contain names and addresses ! It’s a huge list, you just need to scroll the page to the right to reveal the info.

  • Anonymous

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11418970

    ACS:Law could face a 500k Fine, according to the bbc, Maybe this will be on torrent freak soon.

  • Mark

    Witness the absolute lack of concern for an incredibly distressed person threatening suicide:

    —————————————-
    Dear All,

    I will let you know this in person also – Please be alert for the infringer below who is likely to call in today:

    E1CA20000562 —————-

    She has threatened suicide, please be careful in what is said and assure her that a letter will go out to her tomorrow.

    Many Thanks
    Leyla

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    From: Andrew Crossley
    Date: 6 June 2010 15:34
    Subject: FW: COPYRIGHT URGENT
    To: leyla mehru

    See below…
    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors
    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    DX: 44643 MAYFAIR
    http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7898 0571
    Fax: 020 7898 0572
    Mob: 07816 990073

    ACS Law Solicitors is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No.513065. Service of proceedings by e-mail is not accepted.
    This e-mail is confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received this mail in error, we put you on notice of its status,
    please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person; to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for your co-operation. If you have any queries please contact us on 020 7898 0571.
    ACS Law Solicitors is the trading style of Andrew J. Crossley, Sole Principal

    —— Forwarded Message
    From: —–
    Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:13:46 +0100
    To: Andrew Crossley
    Subject: RE: COPYRIGHT URGENT

    E1CA20000562 reference number .

    You have not responded to any of my concerns . I cannot endure any stress and find your lack of response very stressful . I ask that you do respond to ALL of my concerns BOTH in this letter and my previous letter . You say there is no need to be worried about it however i found your letter threatening and its threatening nature and asking for money i do not have made me panic . I am still in that panic mode not knowing what i am going to do if i have to pay such an amount also what if i cant pay and then you take me to court i dont think i can go through that and am seariously considering ending it all . I researched your firm on the internet and i understand you are under investigation by the SRA .

    Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:25:11 +0100
    Subject: Re: COPYRIGHT URGENT
    From: andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk
    To: ————

    Re: COPYRIGHT URGENT Dear Ms —,

    Thank you for your email. I am sorry to hear you are in any way distressed by my firm’s communication to you; there really is no need to be. We have merely written because we have received evidence that your internet connection was utilized for the purposes of copyright infringement of a copyrighted work of our client. The evidence we have received shows that the copyrighted work was made available through your internet connection to others on a Peer to Peer file sharing network.

    I would like to be able to deal with your enquiry more fully, but I am unable to do so until you quote to me our reference number appearing at the top of our letter. I will then pass the matter across to a member of my file sharing team who will respond as soon as possible. Thank you.

    Yours truly,

    Andrew J. Crossley

  • Anonymous

    In reply to a mail regarding the 500 complaints this parasite has received… his defending QC sent a summary of what he can do… The below was part of it!

    Crooked feckers!

    __________________________

    6. I have come across a service designed to protect reputations damaged by the internet. My own IT guy is involved. This is how he describes it; it may be of interest: There are 2 aspects to the work:- Prevention and Removal. The basic principle is that we identify the clients key properties to protect:- Company Name; Director Names; Staff Names; Product Names; Service Names. For prevention, we aim to dominate the first 5 pages of Google with search results to pages we control. We build mini websites, social media profile pages, articles, hub pages, to flood the internet with positive information. We create it in such a way that no one suspects it is done purposely for brand protection. If there is negative press (any website) that is already published, we use tactics to move those web page results off the first 5 pages of Google. Normally no one searches past the first 5 pages. We also help manage their brand/reputation on social media sites (Facebook/Twitter etc..) by registering all available profiles in their name and holding them to prevent anyone getting them and publishing negative information. We also monitor Staff commentary on social media sites about their “work” to ensure they are not writing negatively about their company, boss or clients. The cost is typically £150 per month for a minimum of 12 months, as it can sometimes take 3 – 4 months to see any results. (due to the way Google works)

    If you are interested I can put you in touch.

    Maybe we should meet and take stock when we have disclosure of what we have asked Roberts to provide.

    Regards, AH

    CONFIDENTIALITY

    This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may also be subject to legal professional privilege. If you have received this message in error please notify me by e-mail or telephone (0144 323 7788) and then delete the message and any copies. Unauthorised use, copying or distribution of the message or any information in it is prohibited.

    Andrew Hopper QC is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority; registered number 71587.

  • Scene Rulez

    One of the email from a porn star. Somebody please give him a call.

    Hi Andrew,
    I was in with Mike Wallace last week and he was explaining to me about what you’re doing with the on piracy.
    I would like to meet up for a chat and maybe get the ball rolling the same as Mike.
    Im in London on Thursday as i live in Liverpool and hopefully we could meet up ad have a meeting?
    My number is 07890 269478.
    Hope to speak to you soon,
    Omar Williams.

  • L34k5

    Loads more links up on http://bit.ly/bmiwTR

    We must keep the truth about ACS:Law out in the open.

  • Cunny Funt

    I’d love to see todays emails

  • root@amsix

    @260: I just came here to copy-paste the exact same part. It’s stunning how crooked these guys turn out to be. Spinning media by creating a ‘positive vibe’ over brandnames etc.
    Disgusting!

    Oh and I also found this little gem from “Brian Clarke” , revealing how they like to do business through Barbados, you know, to avoid taxes and all:

    “Hi Andrew,

    I currently have some documents that I need to send to Barbados urgently via international courier. Can I send it with Avanta and reimburse you for all
    costs incurred?

    Thanks,

    Brian”

  • root@amsix

    “Ali, just one more thing concerning the LoC generation, would you kindly remove password protection on the PDFs, as requested by the fufilment centre during the last run of data. Thanks.”

    By all means, remove passwd protection on the PDF’s. That way, if the backup ends up in the webroot someday, the world will be able to see everything ;)))

  • sloth

    Alan Shearer (yes, that one) is on the porn list :p

  • Anonymous2

    Following my comments #120, I should say i am one of kommandant Crossley’s phase two ‘victims’.

    I received a document with a dated court stamp. In the week leading up to that stamp, my PC was hacked in such a blatant fashion that it now leads me to wonder if there wasn’t a connection.

    Attempts to connect to my internet bank, were intercepted with a convincing web page asking for my full security pin, which i declined to give. Even without this information when i could see my account it stalled and then timed out when i tried to do my usual business. A call to my bank revealed this as a phishing attack.

    The point is, with IP info and details about names and address, any third party within the global sphere of Crossley’s operations [#19], could as part of their ‘forensic investigations’, hi-jack PC’s looking for evidence, or attempt identity theft, just to see if one had the funds to meet their demands. [#82].

    Given their shady clientèle, what happens with this database is anyones guess.

    Also something to note, in one of the early posts was the fact that the IP’s are provided by agents of the copyrights holders. This begs the question, how? Do they post the files themselves and then wait to see who connects to downloads, if so, would it be strictly speaking an infringement of copyright, if the copyright owners cooperated in its distribution? They speak of software gathering this intel, but what software could do this without also being the source of the data files concerned?

  • Anonymous2

    #107

    ‘BT returns many IP results as UNKNOWN’

    This possibley means ex-directory, or names too big to list.

    Just a thought.

  • Andrew Verycrossley

    “He (Andrew Hopper QC) has written, with Gregory Treverton-Jones QC, the Solicitor’s Handbook 2008 and 2009″

    I look forward to the 2010 edition and the section on internet media manipulation.

    and as for “it can sometimes take 3 – 4 months to see any results” good luck with that, I don’t think anyone is going to forget this for meany years to come

  • M0nkey

    So is there a definitive list of UK ISPs that have not cooperated with these bastards?

    If so I’d like to give them my custom – bye bye O2

  • David Miles

    BE Unlimited blatantly cooperated with ACS Law, have refuses to answer queries regarding the matter from concerned customers and claim their utter innocence – we got a letter about the damned dance track by Cascada, as a rock follower, I find the very accusation deeply distressing that I would ever download such a track

  • FuzzyX

    Virgin Media and Talk Talk refuse to work with ACS:Law and the others.

    I expect more will soon join them.

    Read what the BBC and Sky say about the release of 8000 more private user details concerning PlusNet and BSkyB broadband users…
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11425789

  • M0nkey

    thank you FuzzyX – will probably move to Talk Talk

  • Anon
  • jack

    @273.
    Your choice for an ISP who will defend your private data from these racketeers is TalkTalk or Virgin. It seems all the others have done a deal with Crossley.
    I’ve just uploaded the Sky deal details on one of the other messages here. Sky have a confidentiality clause, they wanted to deny the existence of the deal. There is also a data protection clause.

  • jack

    @277 thanks for the Forbes link.

  • Jay

    Nice quote from the BBC news site

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11425789

    “The UK’s Information Commissioner said ACS:Law could be fined up to half a million pounds for the breaches”

  • dg100

    TorrentFreak: Hello, Mr Ernesto. Thanks hugely for your excellent and committed coverage of all this – it’s much appreciated, even more so than your usual good work. If it seems like a good idea to you (and you have the time), please can we have a new thread about which ISPs still have policies friendly to the likes of ACS: Law? It would also allow us to compare our ISP experiences in a more on-topic thread.

    To 4Chan and everyone else involved in breaking this: thank you very much indeed as well – you might be almost as bat’s-arse insane as I am, much of the time, but you’ve done us all a massive service here. Thank you. :D

    To ACS: Law: thank you for not securing your systems properly. You’ve done more for us in one weekend than we could have accomplished in a decade of court cases. :D

    @239 by A Law Student Writes

    You can fuck my ugly weasel and call me Betsy Braddock if that’s not a damn good post!
    Copied & saved – thank you kindly, Law Student, I wish your career great success. :D

    @269 by M0nkey

    Talk-Talk’s been good for stroppiness with the anti-p2p crowd so far, so you should be alright on that front.

    On the other hand, after the last few days’ revelations, I’m not sure there’s anything to worry about: I can see most ISPs thinking very hard before co-operating with organisations like ACS: Law again.

    On the other, other hand, I was going to wax lyrical here about my own torrent-friendly ISP (Zen Internet), but I think it’s probably very off-topic if we keep this going. :P

  • Emperess Davis

    Thought it is important that if anyone is in Luton, they pop into see Andrew’s Paralegal:

    EMPRESS ZAWDITU DAVIS
    16 Ouseley Close
    Leagrave
    Luton
    Bedfordshire
    LU4 9GD

  • EssexJames

    I’m loving this on two fronts:

    1. Crossley is getting payback with interest for his shameful legally dubious practices.

    2. I’m a computer security consultant and this situation will reverberate around the legal profession. I can expect my pay rates to go up dramatically due to increased demand for my services.

    Thanks Andrew.

  • just another anon

    RE: Forbes “embarrassing for porn watchers”

    I don’t think it’s embarrassing getting found out downloading porn, but it is embarrassing that everyone knows you have been downloading such poor quality porn. Honestly much better quality material is available over P2P (so I’ve heard).

    I guess only Mr Crossley can afford the 3 dirty DVD’s for £65 bargain offer in Soho sex shops.

    Sure the porn companies suffer from the downloading, but by and large the smart ones saw this cumming and moved into the webcam/liveshow business where profits must be astronomical.

  • Andrew Crossley

    Hi Everyone!

    Just thought I’d pop by and say hello. If you’re out on the roads and see me in my new Jeep Compass 2.4CVT, registration OV59 BUW – please do hone!

    Love

    Andrew
    xxxx

  • Andrew Crossley

    … honk – I meant as in Honky Tonk Man.

    A
    xxx

  • Andrew Crossley

    I dropped this case – you will get the drift.

    How nice I am:

    On 20 May 2010, at 11:48, “Adam Glen”
    wrote:

    > Leyla
    >
    > This is a difficult situation. As foster parents on temporary basis
    > there are legal restrictions on the identification of youths in
    > foster-care. My suggestion on this is that it be submitted to Andrew
    > for consideration in dropping the case.
    >
    > Adam

  • Anonymous

    Omg… so many credit card numbers in .pdf’s in his inbox….

    It’s really sad, how many people have just had their banking information published online because of incompetent people.

  • NZBMAN

    Making loads of cash – One of his sent emails was to view a property for £8,500.00 Per Month

  • Andrew Crossley

    My address:

    I’ll leave you guessing but I live at 5 Oak Way and these are the Oak Way’s in the UK:

    5 Oak Way, Hounslow, Greater London TW14 8, UK
    5 Oak Way, Barnet, Greater London N14 5, UK
    5 Oak Way, Leatherhead, Surrey KT21 1, UK
    5 Oak Way, Crawley, West Sussex RH10 8, UK
    5 Oak Way, Aldershot, Hampshire GU12 4, UK
    5 Oak Way, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2, UK
    5 Oak Way, Croydon, Greater London CR0 7, UK
    5 Oak Way, Woodley, Wokingham RG5 3, UK
    5 Oak Way, Nuthurst, West Sussex RH13 6, UK

    However – DF Audio (dF Audio Ltd is registered in england and wales, company number 06391134. Registered Address: 24 Teesdale, Southgate, Crawley, West Sussex, RH11 8QW, United Kingdom) have quoted for work on my house … so where do I live?

    Andy Wandy

    xxx

  • Andrew Crossley

    “Have you spotted Tamsin swabbing around in her new motor? A black =20
    Jeep. She is very proud!”

    Now who is Tamsin?

  • Andrew Crossley

    To: Kim Jones

    Kim

    Thanks for the update. I have just bought a Bentley Arnage so I am
    sorted for now, although I may buy a Ferrari F430 spider in a couple
    of months, but for cash.

    Regards

    Andrew

    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors

  • Andrew Crossley

    Lunch:

    On 1 Jun 2010, at 18:45, “Charlotte Waters” wrote:

    >
    > Dear Andrew,
    >
    > That would be nice. I like Goucho. I can’t do the next couple of
    > weeks but how about Thursday 17th June?
    >
    > Kid regards Charlotte
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Charlotte Waters
    > Solicitor – Advocate
    > Limited Liability Member
    > Fisher Scoggins Waters LLP Solicitors
    > Hamilton House
    > One Temple Avenue
    > London
    > EC4Y 0HA
    >
    > Mob 07973845025
    > Tel 0207 489 2035
    > Fax 0207 183 8211

  • Andrew Crossley

    Paralegal working for them

    > Sukhmani Bawa
    > Telephone: 07759 576 177
    >

  • Andrew Crossley

    My skiv:

    > Andrew,
    >
    >
    >
    > The admin and paralegal teams ask if it would be possible for you to
    > purchase the following stationery please:
    >
    >
    >
    > 20 lever arch folders (combination of blue and black folders)
    >
    > 10 dividers (numbered 1 to 31)
    >
    > 4 plain dividers
    >
    > 3 staplers
    >
    > 2 Trays
    >
    > Box of pens
    >
    > Box of paperclips
    >
    > Sellotape
    >
    >
    >
    > Thanks.
    >
    >
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    >
    >
    > Jonathan Miller
    >
    > Business Development Manager
    >
    > ACS Law Solicitors
    > 20 Hanover Square
    > London W1S 1JY
    > tel 020 7193 2493
    > fax 020 7990 9099
    > DX 44643 Mayfair
    >
    > jonathan.miller@acs-law.co.uk
    >
    > http://www.acs-law.co.uk

  • FuzzyX

    Funny…

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Empress Davis [mailto:edavis@acs-law.co.uk]
    Sent: 20 August 2010 09:32
    To: Jonathan Miller
    Subject:

    Jmm,

    Only able to do 1 hour this morning as im going into law school for the rest of the day.

    However – Andrew had stated he didnt mind when I did the hours so long as I kept an accurate log of when i do them. I also will be doing some hours over the weekend and I did manage to complete 6 hours yesterday from the afternoon to evening :-)

    Otherwise the uploading into the ACT system has been fairly smooth (now i can log on!!!!!) and I will pester you anytime I have any problems so hope you dont mind business developent manager :-P

    Speak soon x

    20/08/2010 10:00, Jonathan Miller wrote:
    Glad it’s going smoothly.

    You are sorely missed :( No-one to make me a nice cuppa anymore :(

    Oi, oi Remember to keep doing those squats. I expect to see you in a hip hop video by January 2011 at least!!! ;)

    No, I don’t mind you tugging on my sleeze and pestering me for help.
    Anytime. :)

    Bank holiday Friday, we are going out so I expect you there without any excuses. x

    Speak later luv. x

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Empress Davis [mailto:edavis@acs-law.co.uk]
    Sent: 23 August 2010 09:27
    To: Jonathan Miller
    Subject: Re:

    —x—JMM—x—

    Errrrrr – why aren’t you at work yet?!?! how is the business going to DEVELOP without u LoL :-P

    I can just imagine your dying of thirst over there and i realllllllly MISS those Mars-choco hot chocolates :-(

    Me and Emma-J had a catch up at law school friday and i tried again to convince her to come back to acs law but she said no chance in hell lol…

    And where are we going back holiday friday? you mean this friday coming right – as in the 27th?

    I AM NOT GOING JALOUSE

    I REPEAT I AM NOT GOING TO JALOUSE

    :o I want to go out for a meal!!!!!!!!!!!!!>:o

    On 23/08/2010 13:25, Jonathan Miller wrote:
    Oi oi madam, I arrived at 8:30am I’ll have you know!!!

    Ahem…I shall reiterate…I MANAGE the staff….I DEVELOP squat! haha! So
    nerrrrrrrrr!

    Screwing about EJ…I stare at yours and EJ’s empty chairs in the morning (well Brian sits on EJ’s chair now) and weep waterfalls :( COME BACK!!!!

    Bank holiday – Friday I believe we will be doing a meal, so your wish is my command :)

    OK COME TO LOOP! REPEAT, COME TO LOOOOP! (at least?)

    x

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Empress Davis [mailto:edavis@acs-law.co.uk]
    Sent: 23 August 2010 13:58
    To: Jonathan Miller
    Subject: Re:

    LOL….

    ok well im seeing ej again tomorrow so I will update her on the plan (if you havent told her already) and we are meeting up again on friday so if shes up for it we will come together :-)

    Wait there – are we definately getting paid on friday now??

    AND where are we eating? If its chinese, i dont want no RAT jumping out my sweet and sour =-O so pick a good place – me personally i wouldnt mind going TGI’s :-*

    We will meet u @ loop around 5.30pm then – but no long ting u get me doe JMM – quick drinks and go dont want to me in loop till all 7 – 8 – 9 o clock hungry :-(


    Empress Davis

    Paralegal

    ACS Law Solicitors
    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    tel 020 7193 2493
    fax 020 7990 9099
    DX 44643 Mayfair

    edavis@acs-law.co.uk
    http://www.acs-law.co.uk

    Me – Note the flirts.

  • Andrew Crossley

    What as true piece of dirt I am …

    And I quote:

    Jonathan,

    Thank you for the update. I can never get hold of you on the phone
    I called several times today on your blackberry, but it was always
    switched off. If you can keep it on I some times have a thought that I wish
    to convey or discuss and being able to speak to you is often very helpful. It

    is no problem if you would rather forget about work in the evenings and
    weekends, but I have to think about the work the whole time.

    Thank you also for coming in on Sunday; your additional efforts over

    and above your required time is never unappreciated and will be duly
    recognised.

    So thank you very much.

    I am trying to think of ways of wrong-footing the SRA and taking the

    wind out of their sails. Sorry for the mixed metaphor. My latest wheeze
    is to contact schools or local authorities and offer to give talks to
    teenagers at schools about file sharing and why we do what we do. I would offer
    to do this free of charge and offer it as a service to educate young
    people not to file share, to prove that the work we do is not all about the money.

    What do you think? If you like it or have any other ideas let me know and we

    need to get someone to cold call.write to school authorities to offer this
    free service. It will improve our profile with the SRA, educate young
    people and in time reduce file sharing, which will in turn benefit the creative
    industries.

    Regards

    Andrew

  • Andrew Crossley

    Good move Georgina – not (NOT) joining them:

    > Georgina Reeves
    >
    > 82 Wallingford Road
    > Goring-On-Thames
    > Reading
    > RG8 0HN
    >
    > Mobile – 07739 324 031
    >

  • Andrew Crossley

    Legal cover-er

    wrote:

    > Thanks Andrew. What are the dates you need cover for?
    >
    > Kind regards
    >
    > Alastair
    >
    > Alastair Logan OBE., LL.B.,
    > Firth & Co
    > White Lea East
    > Guildford Road
    > Rudgwick
    > RH12 3HB
    >
    > Tel/Fax: 01403 751527

  • Andrew Crossley

    I’m knobbing her ….

    To: Tamsin

    Subject: Re: PDQ

    Thank you

    A xxx

  • Andrew Crossley

    Panto

    To: “emmanowell@googlemail.com”

  • Andrew Crossley

    To: drgmsmith@btinternet.com

    RE: KPMG Fiasco and my cover-up and illegal actions:

    Roger suggests that we should agree to allow kpmg to attend a meeting but we can meet privately beforehand to discuss elements that would be privileged f=
    rom them and we can agree the line to take with kpmg in advance.=20

    Roger is keen to meet initially at 2pm Wednesday and 4pm we meet with kpmg.=20=

    Regards

  • Andrew Crossley

    More people implicated:

    On 2 Jul 10, at 13:16, “Lee Bowden” <lee@piriltd.com wrote:

    Bowden at the far post….scores his second of the day….OH YES!!

    From: Robert Pretorius [mailto:rob@erigogroup.com]
    Sent: 02 July 10 13:02
    To: Lee Bowden
    Subject: RE: Capturing IP Addresses For Copyright Infringement

    Hi Lee

    All our materials are being sent to you today.

    To which address do you want them to go to?

    Kind Regards

    Robert Pretorius

    Erigo Distribution Ltd

    25a Lyon Road

    Hersham

    KT12 3PU

    T: +44(0)1932219800

    F: +44(0)1932221394

  • Andrew Crossley

    “Oops my number at work is 0203 178 6806. Not what said before.

    Hooray for iPads. I love mine.”

  • Andrew Crossley

    Subject: Re: ice and bed
    References:
    From: “Andrew J. Crossley”
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=us-ascii
    In-Reply-To:
    Message-Id:
    Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 18:18:07 +0100
    To: Louise Crossley
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A293)

    Your email has been marked as blocked sender. No further emails from you wil=
    l be received by me. Do not ever attempt any form of contact with me again a=
    s long as you live.=20

    Andrew your ex husband of 14 years.=20
    >=20

  • Andrew Crossley

    Subject: Re: ice and bed
    References:
    From: “Andrew J. Crossley”
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=us-ascii
    In-Reply-To:
    Message-Id:
    Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 18:21:08 +0100
    To: Louise Crossley
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A293)

    You are fucking joke. Happy? You? With Kevin the drug addled hermit who has n=
    othing to do with you or his family. You are the saddest person I have ever m=
    et.=20

    Now get the fuck away from me forever you complete washed up drug addict los=
    er.=20

    Andrew your ex husband of 14 years.=20
    >=20

  • Andrew Crossley

    My daughter:

    To: Issey Crossley

    You should be in bed! Keep your phone on so I can call to let you know when I will be with you. Should be by 1. I am in court Monday in Southampton at 10 then I and coming to you.=20

    Dad xxx

  • Andrew Crossley

    About Issey (twitter – isseyc)

    Issey – this is what I think of life with our family:

    I long abandoned the concept of a harmonious and peaceful family life when t=
    his work came along and ruined my life!=20

  • some_findings

    1. the RBS loan of ~8k taken last month is fraudulent activity as it uses the old address of 18 hanover square, not their current location of 20 hanover square.

    2. details of how their system works:
    The main capturing software is my modified and updated software “xTrack”
    that runs on top of a P2P client software called “Transmission”.

    For each content (ie. an item that is being shared on P2P) xTrack finds
    all peers (ie. computers running a P2P client software that are
    connected to that content) and disregards all that are not in the UK by
    filtering non-UK IPs. Once a UK peer is found, xTrack checks to see
    whether or not they understand P2P protocol. If yes, then xTrack checks
    whether or not they are uploading the content to its P2P swarm (ie, all
    peers uploading/downloading that content). If yes, 3 different pieces of
    that content are downloaded by xTrack and checksum -ed to establish 1)
    the peer is uploading/seeding content and 2) the pieces are part of that
    content. This will happen every day for a specific peer. All above
    transactions are logged by xTrack.

    > 2. How do you know or more importantly, should I say, what technical
    > information have you gathered which indicates to you that the
    > evidence has a high degree of credibility?
    Once an IP is uploading/seeding to a P2P swarm, it’s 100% safe to assume
    that the data is coming from that IP unless ISPs who are transporting
    the packets between that IP and xTrack are somehow modifying its data,
    very unlikely and I’d say virtually none.

    > 3. Andrew mentioned to me that, when you capture the data from the
    > infringer, it is in the form of data packets. Would it be possible
    > to somehow convert these data packets into viewable formats (i.e.
    > AVI or mpeg)? This way, we would be able to visually marry the
    > evidence together with our client’s Works, thus present the
    > evidence in an easily recognisable format to the court.
    Pieces downloaded for each content (read movie) are on average 512KB to
    8MB in size for movies and this highly depends on that size of movie in
    its whole. Now, for example if there are 3 pieces of that content it’s
    about 1-3 (on average) minutes of that content and they are almost
    always of different parts of it, ie. 1:13 (hh:mm:ss), 18:32 and 1:02:02
    into movie in a 1:30:00 movie. So visually you’ll see a flash or jumps
    from scenes to scenes if you put them together PROVIDING the compression
    used in the AVI or MPEG is recognized by the Playback software depending
    on the positions of the pieces in the movie.

    > 4. In relation to question 3, would you be able to return to us any
    > and all data packets pertaining to each infringer’s case (as well
    > as the converted viewable versions, if possible) upon request?
    Yes. As Andrew said only for those ones you specify, otherwise you’ll
    need a CD/DVD production plant for all of them to be delivered to you.

    > 5. What is GUID? How does GUID relate to File ID as contained within
    > the Statement Report of our LoC? Where does GUID fit into your
    > data capturing process?
    GUID in LoC is a Ghrapical Unique IDentifier, 40 characters long that a
    P2P client software assigns to itself when it starts up. It’ll stay the
    same until it restarts again.
    When pieces are downloaded, a whole host of information regarding the
    uploading peer is logged as well as this GUID. It’s a good data part
    plus the ISP details of the peer that allows to filter out duplicate IPs.

    > 6. Does the File ID identify our client’s Works exclusively?? Would
    > it be possible that multiple copies of the same Work is being made
    > available by infringers with different File IDs??
    File ID is a hash that is almost globally unique for contents shared on
    P2P networks. Copies of the same work (read client’s work) will have
    different File ID but copies of the same content are just copies and
    basically will have the same File ID. File IDs are just there to
    determine the copies of the contents on P2P networks.

    It’s very possible and a common practice actually for a client’s work to
    be shared with different File IDs ie. via different P2P contents.

    To marry a File ID to a client’s work, the original should be provided
    by clients and then visually checked against the content for a %100
    accuracy.

    [in email: Re: IMPORTANT: Data Monitoring Processes - LITIGATION STAGE]

    3. passwords not changed for their propalms terminal, in email subject: “Digi System Setup – NEW DETAILS” (25/6/2010) – inside, a database full of names/addresses/ips/cases/evidence/documents tracking – no firewall – not secure.

    4. Their bank statements are visible.

    5. Thinking of bankruptcy – in various emails.

    6. Subject to SRA investigation – private family life revealed – in COMPLETE REPORT TO #497E95.docx

    7. Takedown of forum Slyck in 6. above, for defamatory comments mentioned in the above document.

    and more to come…

  • just another anon

    “I can confirm that we will be taking no action against resellers or major corporate customers”

    So they’re just going after the little guys then, i.e. anyone who can’t afford to defend themselves against a lawsuit.

  • FuzzyX

    Claire is on the BSkyB porn list and just not happy…
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/11430299

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme | TorrentFreak -- Topsy.com

  • tru

    Security Letters…

    Fellow Paralegals,

    From now on, if you find a response to a third party letter, do not send a security letter. Instead, please move the letter into the ABANDON HOPE folder in General Paras.

    This is because Andrew and Adam will be drafting a new letter so we can drop a couple of hundred cases over the next couple of weeks, putting pressure on those who we do not drop to settle.

    If you find someone who is blind, one legged and dying, and you think they are not worth pursuing due to the possibility of bad PR, please also put them in there. However, the majority of cases will be continued.

    Enjoy your evening,

    Rob Heelas

    ACS Law Solicitors

  • FuzzyX
  • just another anon

    I’m stunned by this. Truly stunned. Here we have Prakash Mistry of BT, one of the UK’s largest technology companies, sending its customers details to a tiny law company via an unencrypted XLS file in an unencrypted email.

    I just wonder what else they’re doing with our data, it’s bad enough they let foreign call centre workers see our details, but this is sickening.

    In other news I love that someone managed to defend themselves by pointing out the version of Vuze they were alledgedly using wasn’t even released at the time they were alleged to have downloaded the file.

  • Freedom Fighter

    All UK citizens are encouraged to contact their ISPs and demand they release an official statement ensuring they will NEVER give up any details to the ACS:Law scammers and Andrew Johnothan Crossley.

    Download and share the full leak: http://acslaw.blogspot.com/2010/09/breaking-news-andrew-crossleys.html

    Don’t let those around you get bullied by this scam law firm.

  • Carol

    Hi all, I’m actually Andrew being butthurt. I’m lonely, call me!!

  • Anonymous

    All the ACS emails online and ready to read

    http://ueof.co.uk/acslaw

  • Bbear

    Sky suspends co-operation with anti-piracy firm…
    “A Sky spokesman said: “We have suspended all co-operation with ACS:Law with immediate effect.
    “This suspension will remain in place until ACS:Law demonstrates adequate measures to protect the security of personal information.”
    Sky said it was “very concerned” at the apparent loss of data and “by the actions of those who have sought to publicise the identities of individual customers”.
    “Like other broadband providers, Sky can be required to disclose information about customers whose accounts are alleged to have been used for illegal downloading,” the spokesman said.
    “We support the principle that copyright material should be protected and we co-operate with court orders requiring disclosure.”
    But it said that the security of customer information was also “a high priority” and the data was only ever disclosed in encrypted form.
    “In addition, we have an agreement with ACS:Law that requires data to be stored and used safely and securely,” the spokesman said.”

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sky-suspends-cooperation-with-antipiracy-firm-2092208.html

  • A Law Student Writes

    Postscript:

    All ISPs who sent user data to ACS:Law are effectively co-conspirators in the extortion abuse scam and need to be mercilessly sued, boycotted and bankrupted.

    Why? Because the only logical reason Virgin + Talk-Talk were not served with these bogus orders for discovery must be that they told ACS in advance that their legal validity would be fully challenged and exposed in court. Anyone served with an order obtained ex parte is free to mount such a defence by appearing in the same court where the order was granted and arguing it is unjustified or wrongly obtained and must therefore be revoked.

    Thus, all other ISPs, e.g. SKY, could have fended these jackals off by the same means, as opposed to surrendering their clients’ data to the first set of cheap cowboys who come waving some recycled legal toilet-paper.

    But no, these skuzzbucket gutless collaborators much preferred to bend their users over a barrel and let the leering Crossley have his perverted way with them.

    Hence SKY and all the other disgusting surrender-ISPs must be sued to death for negligence, breach of contract and breach of confidentiality for handing over client data based on legally invalid court orders obtained fraudulently by ACS.

    The fact that ACS backed off from Virgin and TalkTalk is proof-positive these bottomfeeders were fully aware from the outset that their ‘court orders’ were essentially worthless scraps of bumroll that could never withstand legal scrutiny.

    But still, they intended to and did milk the scam for as long as possible, whilst carefully avoiding any legal testing of its rotten basis.

    That is, until the power of ‘Anonymous’ booted this swindler squarely in the nuts.

    Q.E.D.

  • Pingback: Girish Kumar the man who broke acs law « Bananas in the Falklands

  • bwx

    @A Law Student

    Well said

  • A Law Student Writes

    OK, here’s a link confirming my supposition above re. legal challenge of ACS bogus court orders:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2010/09/acslaw.html

    Mr Heaney says TalkTalk has never handed over customer data to ACS:Law or any other legal firm. Other ISPs suggested that was because no demand had ever been made, but Mr Heaney told me that was not the case: “We’re continually approached by lawyers from ACS:Law and other firms and have consistently said ‘no’. We’ve said, ‘Let’s have a debate in court if you think you’ve a reasonable case.’ None of them have ever taken us up on the offer.” He went on: “I’m not going to expose my customers to letters that they would consider bullying and threatening.”

  • Happy Feet

    Just a snippet from a 55 page piece written by him about him. It’s a .docx file called 497E95.docx in andrew_crossley@acs-law_co_uk > cur > 1282586186.H588025P27137.mail2.dfsv61.eml

    It’s a very interesting read.

    I, trading as ACS Law Solicitors, currently employ 17 people. Fifteen months ago I employed one person. The sole reason for the significant increase in staff is to deal with and handle the file sharing litigation work. I was introduced to the file sharing litigation work through my former partner Nicola Beale. Nicola worked from time to time as a locum for Caroline Miller, a solicitor and wife of Brian Miller, ex-partner of Messrs Davenport Lyons (“DL”). Mr Miller was looking to find a suitable firm to take on the file sharing litigation that DL had been doing, but had – for its own reasons – decided to discontinue. Precisely why I was chosen is a question for DL, but I am aware that it was to do with my experience of intellectual property litigation, my prior experience in dealing with and responding to media interest in my work (as I had notably acted for a gentleman embroiled in the Dubai “Sex on the Beach” case in 2008, which resulted in my client’s three-month prison sentence being quashed). I also think a lot had to do with personalities and I and Mr Miller got on very well and worked hard to effect the smoothest possible transfer we could.

  • mgf

    ”British ISP Sky Broadband cuts off ACS:Law and refuse to cooperate after at least 4,000 of their customers’ information was carelessly leaked. According to Sky Broadband, ‘We have suspended all co-operation with ACS:Law with immediate effect. This suspension will remain in place until ACS:Law demonstrates adequate measures to protect the security of personal information.’ Sky Broadband had been providing customer information to ACS:Law as part of their anti-piracy operation.”

    http://www.slyck.com/story2064_ISP_Sky_Broadband_Cuts_off_ACSLaw

    (summary shameless copied from the slashdot article which links to the same slyck.com article)

  • homer

    People need to look here

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE8ol60TLsE

    pay us 500 pounds or goto court

    reading the leak e-mail seen there more into reaching a target

  • Pingback: Cause and Effect: The Fallout of ACS:Law, ISPs and Anon. « BPI Boycott

  • WalACS

    Pretty rich for Sky to be claiming non cooperation, when the leaked docs show a contract signed in May 2010 between BSkyB and one Ballinas Olsson, via Evidenzia for Sky to be paid up to “£65 per IP address requested” (upon a court order).

  • Anonymous Coward

    I love a bit of Schadenfreude in the morning with my coffee. I’m torn between glee at the prospect of this tool being sued out of existence, and horror at the numbers of people, particularly acutely vulnerable people, who have been victims of this repulsive group of extortionists.

    @A Law Student – I’m officially in love.

  • o2 customer

    Apparently o2 are refusing to comment on the fact that they handed over a list of users to ACS Law ‘suspected’ of downloading p0rn – which doesn’t say much for the integrity of the firm.

    Has anyone managed to (or wants to team up) in cracking this password sent from Ruth Brooke to Andrew Crossley on the 12th August @ 16:45 with the spreadsheets detailing the list of o2 and BE customers?

  • Anon

    @ A law student – good work and agree in full.
    @325. As far as I have been able to ascertain that document isn’t actually signed by sky. I would dearly love to find the fully signed one. If anyone locates it please let us know.

    Does anyone know what legal basis we can use to sue sky. I’m sure they’re in their offices shredding every possible incriminating document as we speak!!!

  • Password

    Search online – there is a website that offers to do it for what you will pay – and if you pay a penny, they still do it. Only found this out after using it and paying them £3.

  • Anonymouse

    This is an excellent article takes the entire story from operation payback to the end.
    Great info on the isp gathering machine.
    The “legal blackmail” business: inside a P2P settlement factory

    http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/09/amounts-to-blackmail-inside-a-p2p-settlement-letter-factory.ars

    Quote:

    The “IT firm” Dunlap mentions appears to be Guardaley, the BitTorrent detection company cited in US Copyright Group court filings. Guardaley identifies the IP addresses of suspected infringers, logs all necessary data, and turns this information over the lawyers. But the firm is deeply implicated in the US Copyright Group, not just a mere contractor.

    Guardaley is based in Germany, where it is run by Bejamin Perino and Patrick Acheche, though the firm has registered itself as a UK business, too, with an unlikely address in an Aldermaston office park.

    In a document (PDF) filed with the White House’s new “IP Czar” earlier this year, Perino is listed as the “managing director” of Guardaley, and Dunlap called on the expertise of his subordinate Acheche as an expert witness who swore to the accuracy of the company’s data in court filings. But then, in April of this year, another court filing appeared in the Far Cry case. Here, Perino declared that he was “one of four Managers of the US Copyright Group (USCG) which is a private company dedicated to anti-piracy efforts in the motion picture industry involving unlawful torrent downloading.”

    Virginia state records seen by Ars show that DGW set up “US Copyright Group” as a legal entity, though it appears to be some sort of partnership between the law firm and the techies at Guardaley.

    Here’s where it gets weird: this summer, after falling out with his detection company, Crossley turned to a young man named Terence, who is referenced above and who helped Crossley get into the settlement letter business. Terence then helped Crossley sign on with… Guardaley.

    Crossley writes about a “guy I know called Patrick who is good friends with Terence. Patrick is based in Germany with a high quality system. We get no hidden charges and I will drop my charges to fully absorb the extra cost.”

    He needed to rush the deal through, because the pornographer Jasper Feversham was upset that detection of his works had stopped; Crossley needed a new data supplier as soon as he could get one.

    The deal, for 15 percent gross, was done through Terence; no emails emerge from Guardaley at all. Even Crossley found the situation odd. “Also, I note that Guardaley in the UK is registered as a dormant company. That needs to be changed if that is the contracting company. And why is there a company in the UK and why its it registered in Aldermaston? What’s all that about? (as Peter Kay would say).”

    In response, Terence offers some intriguing details. “GL [Guardaley] has a number of companies for monitoring and different ones are used depending on content and jurisdiction. The data supplier for [ACS Law client] Mediacat will be a Swiss company to manage PR (you know how it is!).”

    Despite using the same tech, Guardaley apparently operates under numerous names. This means that each of the entities it creates needs a separate “expert’s report” verifying that the system is accurate. The one drafted for Guardaley itself wouldn’t work; a new expert must be found.

    An independent expert’s report is in place for Guardaley, but your monitoring will be done through a different legal entity,” wrote Terence. “This will mean that we will need to get a new one created. There will be no problems, as the technology used will be exactly the same as Guardaley’s.” And later: “We are in correspondence with an expert and the report can be finalised fairly quickly, well in advance of the first court order.”

    So, while Tom Dunlap suggests that “Guardaley” doesn’t work for ACS Law, some other company with a new name and the same tech is. This gives Guardaley a hand in the two major “settlement letter” factories in the US and UK.

  • Anonymous

    @327 – I’m on the same boat!!!!!

    This password is doing my head in?!

  • Terence Tsang

    Hi All

    Just wanted to give you all my new contact details if you need to contact me.

    T

    Terence Tsang
    Trainee Solicitor

    Cramer Pelmont Solicitors
    33 Cavendish Square,
    London,
    W1G 0PW
    Phone No : 020 7016 3011
    Direct Fax : 020 7016 3026
    Mobile No : 07565 946 654
    Email : ttsang@cramerpelmont.co.uk
    DX : 42704 OXFORD CIRCUS NORTH
    http://www.cramerpelmont.co.uk

  • anon
  • Andrew Crossley

    All

    An email to my mate Colin Curtis (colincurtisconnection@gmail.com)

    Hi Andrew

    Yes mate I have a family I married a girl called Sue from Liverpool. Makes it easier for me I’m not good with names :-)
    I have 4 children Zelda 16 Luke 15 Kara 13 Tyler 11

    2 girls two boys !

    Yes if anything I am more committed
    to the music than ever I take on board new music in all its guises House Jazz Soul etc I have one Freestylin’ jazzy show and a new House n Soul Show starting in a couple of weeks.

    Yes we will tie in as many old faces when you visit as we can ! Hewan Clarke comes down, Salts from the Jazz Defektors as well to the Freestylin’ session,Mike Shaft has been. I did a Rafters revival with him and Hewan recently at the new Band on The Wall it was rammed we had a great night.Playpen holds some great memories for me too mate early house music from Chicago etc

    Talk Soon

    Colin

    On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Crossley wrote:
    Colin,

    Thanks for your swift reply. I am really glad to hear you are still in touch with Sue. I would love to catch up with her (and her mate Debbie).

    You mentioned a family. I did not know you had any children. I have two children myself. Isabelle, who is 16 and Lucas who is 12. They have different mums just to confuse things!

    I am still mad for the music and buy stuff all the time. I got really broke once and sold off all my rarer records, and have over the years been buying them all back! Raices, Hector Costita, Terry Callier and the like.

    I am very flattered to be considered worthy enough to even get a mention in the history of the Berlin. Funny though, you meet more people who said they went there than could ever have possibly fitted in the place!

    I see Gilles occasionally, but DJ’s live a mostly nocturnal like, whereas solicitors only venture out in daylight, so we rarely meet. He has done well, which I am always pleased about and I have always had enormous admiration for his total commitment to his craft, much as I have with you.

    My time now is spent mostly identifying and pursuing illegal file sharers on file sharing networks for various copyright owners. I have a small team of people who work with me doing that. I get a lot of flak for doing so, but I keep at it because I have always felt that what I am doing for my clients is right. It’s surprisingly good fun too!

    I will be up to Manchester soon. Maybe next month, so perhaps we can meet before or after your gig in Manchester; it would be great to catch up.

    And how are the other guys from back in the day? Mike Shaft – I loved the Playpen. I lived with a barmaid from there, Fiona (she had a shock of bleach blond hair and a earring in her nose), for four years and we remain close friends to this day. Richard Searling, who does not appear to have aged, mostly because he looked old to begin with. Ha ha…

    Anyway, keep in touch, and I will let you know when I am in Manchester next.

    Best wishes

    Regards

    Andrew

  • Andrew Crossley

    Why would he be registering on eHarmony on 19.08.2010 01:02

    Does Tamsin know?

  • Anonymous

    “An email to my mate Colin Curtis (colincurtisconnection@gmail.com) ”

    Interesting – shows a belief that what he’s doing is right and good.

  • nomad

    I have read lots of these e-mails and one of those names of one of the staff seems bogus to say the least she/he is called empress davies?

  • Andrew

    @337

    No, no. Empress is real. A woman and lives:

    Thought it is important that if anyone is in Luton, they pop into see Andrew’s Paralegal:

    EMPRESS ZAWDITU DAVIS
    16 Ouseley Close
    Leagrave
    Luton
    Bedfordshire
    LU4 9GD

    She works from home and also is a director a a company called Empress Cafe Ltd.

    Have a look on Google maps – torrid housing estate.

    A
    x

  • Pingback: Law Firm Facing Investigation After Details of 5,000 Broadband Users are Leaked to Pirate Bay : IHaZFuN

  • Anonymous

    http://www.slyck.com/story2064_ISP_Sky_Broadband_Cuts_off_ACSLaw

    …first small success! letz go on friends!

  • bbear

    BT embroiled in ACS:Law porn list breach…

    “BT has admitted it sent the personal details of more than 500 customers as an unsecured document to legal firm ACS:Law, following a court order.
    The news could put BT in breach of the Data Protection Act, which requires firms to keep customers’ data secure at all times.
    The e-mails emerged following a security lapse at ACS:Law.
    A BT official admitted “unencrypted” personal data was sent, adding it “would not happen again”.
    The unsecured Excel documents were sent in late August by Prakash Mistry, a lawyer working for British Telecom, to Andrew Crossley – who runs ACS:Law.
    “In accordance with the Court’s Order of 17 February 2010 (“the Order”), please find enclosed the data in accordance with paragraph 1 of the Order,” wrote Mr Mistry in the e-mail.
    “Please acknowledge safe receipt and that the data will be held securely and shall be used only in accordance with the provisions of the Order,” he added.”

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11434809

  • Cluedo

    Passwords for the encrypted o2/BE spreadsheets?

    Somebody care to prove their awesomeness by cracking these badboys? :)

  • Anonymous

    It;ll take time to get the password for the O2 & Be files, if anyone is good at hacking md5 hashes I think the one for the Be file is 0066AAFA517EC9C4AD890041AC365322

    So if you can crack it please post.

  • Anon

    I’ve downloaded the XLSX spreadsheets ones – they were sent again unprotected.

    Search online.

  • Mr ?

    Return-path:
    Envelope-to: andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk
    Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:42:07 +0100
    Received: from [88.211.49.82] (helo=HPW7Jonathan)
    by mail2.dfsv61.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
    (envelope-from )
    id 1Onq12-0001wo-L1; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:42:00 +0100
    From: “Jonathan Miller”
    To: “‘Andrew Crossley’” ,
    “‘Alireza Torabi’”
    Cc: “‘Adam Glen’”
    References:
    In-Reply-To:
    Subject: RE: URGENT: BSkyB Letters For Processing – High Priority
    Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:41:57 +0100
    Message-ID:
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/related;
    boundary=”—-=_NextPart_000_004A_01CB4378.FBA78F30″
    X-Priority: 1 (Highest)
    X-MSMail-Priority: High
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
    Thread-Index: ActDbtNCQ9Q96T5lxEWuPFRhdUwWTwAAYFMg
    Content-Language: en-gb
    Importance: High
    X-ACL-Warn: {

    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

    ——=_NextPart_000_004A_01CB4378.FBA78F30
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
    boundary=”—-=_NextPart_001_004B_01CB4378.FBA78F30″

    ——=_NextPart_001_004B_01CB4378.FBA78F30
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset=”us-ascii”
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Ali, just one more thing concerning the LoC generation, would you kindly
    remove password protection on the PDFs, as requested by the fufilment centre
    during the last run of data. Thanks.

    From: Andrew Crossley [mailto:andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk]
    Sent: 24 August 2010 10:29
    To: Alireza Torabi; Jonathan Miller
    Cc: Adam Glen
    Subject: Re: URGENT: BSkyB Letters For Processing – High Priority

    Ali,

    That is a good question and in essence the answer will be yes, however, if
    it is possible to flag or highlight these we can review them on a case by
    case basis. Timing is important here, because if people have signed an
    undertaking not to upload and they do we have a potentially powerful case to
    run.

    Adam may have a view on this, but in principle I see no reason why we should
    not send to the same people if they are caught again. Adam…?

    Regards

    Andrew

    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors
    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    DX: 44643 MAYFAIR
    http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7898 0571
    Fax: 020 7898 0572
    Mob: 07816 990073

    ACS Law Solicitors is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
    No.513065. Service of proceedings by e-mail is not accepted.
    This e-mail is confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have
    received this mail in error, we put you on notice of its status,
    please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message
    from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
    disclose its contents to any other person; to do so could be a breach of
    confidence. Thank you for your co-operation. If you have any queries please
    contact us on 020 7898 0571.
    ACS Law Solicitors is the trading style of Andrew J. Crossley, Sole
    Principal

    ——=_NextPart_001_004B_01CB4378.FBA78F30
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset=”us-ascii”
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
    .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}

    Re: URGENT:  BSkyB Letters For Processing – High =
    Priority

    Ali, just one more thing concerning the LoC generation, =
    would
    you kindly remove password protection on the PDFs, as requested by the
    fufilment centre during the last run of data.  =
    Thanks.

     

    From: Andrew Crossley =
    [mailto:andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk]

    Sent: 24 August 2010 10:29
    To: Alireza Torabi; Jonathan Miller
    Cc: Adam Glen
    Subject: Re: URGENT: BSkyB Letters For Processing – High =
    Priority

     

    Ali,

    That is a good question and in essence the answer will be yes, however, =
    if it
    is possible to flag or highlight these we can review them on a case by =
    case
    basis. Timing is important here, because if people have signed an =
    undertaking
    not to upload and they do we have a potentially powerful case to =
    run.

    Adam may have a view on this, but in principle I see no reason why we =
    should
    not send to the same people if they are caught again. Adam…?

    Regards

    Andrew

    Andrew J. Crossley
    Principal
    ACS Law Solicitors
    20 Hanover Square
    London W1S 1JY
    DX: 44643 MAYFAIR
    http://www.acs-law.co.uk
    Tel: 020 7898 0571
    Fax: 020 7898 0572
    Mob: 07816 990073

    ACS Law Solicitors is regulated by the Solicitors =
    Regulation
    Authority No.513065. Service of proceedings by e-mail is not =
    accepted.
    This e-mail is confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you =
    have
    received this mail in error, we put you on notice of its status,
    please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this =
    message from
    your system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
    disclose its contents to any other person; to do so could be a breach of
    confidence. Thank you for your co-operation. If you have any queries =
    please
    contact us on 020 7898 0571.
    ACS Law Solicitors is the trading style of Andrew J. Crossley, Sole
    Principal

     

    ——=_NextPart_001_004B_01CB4378.FBA78F30–

    ——=_NextPart_000_004A_01CB4378.FBA78F30
    Content-Type: image/png;
    name=”image001.png”
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
    Content-ID:

    iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAFgAAAAiCAYAAADbLB6TAAADJWlDQ1BJQ0MgUHJvZmlsZQAAeAGF
    lE1IFGEYx/+zjQSxBtGXCMXQwSRUJgtSAtP1K1O2ZdVMCWKdfXedHGenmd0tRSKE6Jh1jC5WRIeI
    TuGhQ6c6RASZdYmgo0UQBV4itv87k7tjVL4wM795nv/7fL3DAFWPUo5jRTRgys67yd6Ydnp0TNv8
    GlWoRhRcKcNzOhKJAZ+plc/1a/UtFGlZapSx1vs2fKt2mRBQNCp3ZAM+LHk84OOSL+SdPDVnJBsT
    qTTZITe4Q8lO8i3y1myIx0OcFp4BVLVTkzMcl3EiO8gtRSMrYz4g63batMnvpT3tGVPUsN/INzkL
    2rjy/UDbHmDTi4ptzAMe3AN211Vs9TXAzhFg8VDF9j3pz0fZ9crLHGr2wynRGGv6UCp9rwM23wB+
    Xi+VftwulX7eYQ7W8dQyCm7R17Iw5SUQ1BvsZvzkGv2Lg558VQuwwDmObAH6rwA3PwL7HwLbHwOJ
    amCoFZHLbDe48uIi5wJ05pxp18xO5LVmXT+idfBohdZnG00NWsqyNN/laa7whFsU6SZMWQXO2V/b
    eI8Ke3iQT/YXuSS87t+szKVTXZwlmtjWp7To6iY3kO9nzJ4+cj2v9xm3Zzhg5YCZ7xsKOHLKtuI8
    F6mJ1Njj8ZNkxldUJx+T85A85xUHZUzffi51IkGupT05meuXml3c2z4zMcQzkqxYMxOd8d/8xi0k
    Zd591Nx1LP+bZ22RZxiFBQETNu82NCTRixga4cBFDhl6TCpMWqVf0GrCw+RflRYS5V0WFb1Y4Z4V
    f895FLhbxj+FWBxzDeUImv5O/6Iv6wv6Xf3zfG2hvuKZc8+axqtrXxlXZpbVyLhBjTK+rCmIb7Da
    DnotZGmd4hX05JX1jeHqMvZ8bdmjyRzianw11KUIZWrEOOPJrmX3RbLFN+HnW8v2r+lR+3z2SU0l
    17K6eGYp+nw2XA1r/7OrYNKyq/DkjZAuPGuh7lUPqn1qi9oKTT2mtqttahffjqoD5R3DnJWJC6zb
    ZfUp9mBjmt7KSVdmi+Dfwi+G/6VeYQvXNDT5D024uYxpCd8R3DZwh5T/w1+zAw3eoYKLCAAAEKJJ
    REFUaAXtWmtwlOd5Pbur1Uq7q9UV3S8IhLkYECRjjGNCbGNsxrVJbKex8zftuO00dX+l+df87WQ6
    TdM2dSczvUxtMrnY1IZgAyYxsTExWNgCJESMLuhmQHetpNWudlfqOc+nb7VSTErq/ggNr0a7+33f
    e3ne8zzveS67wJ12B4HbGQGPK/wCmz5PTEyis6sTHv6tbAUFBVi3rgkez9IzDevr68Px42/izNkW
    pFJzyMnx47Of2Y59+x5FY2PjsmlSqTSuXPkIR48ex8W2dszPpxDIDWDb9m3Y+/AeNDU1Leuvi1Q6
    jbbBbgxNjKN+VSXWldfA5/NBa09OTqLnai/m0ylee3jfg6KiYjQ01MPr9dpcyWQSg9euYXR4mNfZ
    soOyelFVVYVIJIKP2Wd8bNz2p7kjkQJUV9dQxjT6+/sxO5vgM025gLy8INasWY3c3Fz0cv8T4+Ps
    x9kXp0+lknU7d+4cyKzGCQ3gkyd/gX/63gsc6Dfh3Bc9bVzdgG99668RCOTabQl++PBP8cbRo5iN
    J5DDTVtj53n+a/GHHnwATz/9FMcEMBOL4dBrh3D8zRNIplLL+qfnF5CfH8CuXbvwZfYPBoM2VTw5
    h5+3t+DNthYCOI+C/BA+v74Ze+7+LEGdR2vrebzw/e9jdjpm2Enue3fci+ee+2OCl2NzXL9xAy//
    5GWcOv1LeF0E+ERbllz79z+BHffcg0OHDuHtd06ZYqTUjRs24Jmv/CGmp6fx0oEfYHh4iAB6kea6
    1dVV+Pqf/xnKy8vxzy/8Cy5eaEd6IWWGKazmErG6gwcPDjgSmBjOy9jYGPz+HAMn67bEIYhxWywQ
    KOEiaUgZrxx8FT5aQY5XFjWPZDKNHL+PG/Hy8xxef+MYAnl5eOLxx3GupQVHXj8KL63M7Z9Kzdt4
    H60tTiWdPHkSFRT60Ucf4YpAdGYa73dfNvByvDmIzSXQNtCDbfXrUBIqgMfrQSAnF6lAEl5uL8fv
    zwDryh+biXHuOPflh9bJbrKw6akps7zCwiJT7Dz35tUJoUkmU0mekiitcx65/lyuR4D5OZ1O8rSm
    EaPRSG4/95wDx8D8VPKs1+yVMq1owyMjXCxj2Jmn6j7LycZGR+3eDIV+i2Bog15N49GRiuCL+x9H
    WekqzPNPT3Rkz5w5i+hUFJcuddCy5w18LVFQEMEje/egpKjE+su6pP3Ori6zLi2UJswa40rEZUyR
    OiG32gTCzMxMZs7scTKUKAFO8USFC8J2qjSz1hO4ybkkpqaj9ty5y1c+TCSSmOMzUVQikTC5Na9k
    raqoRE3NVl1+AsDkKZe71GGROYQfEnNzGB0fs3vRaJRHZpQASkcLtkBdXR2efPJLuIs8Le1aozRT
    7DvEYzo2PuHMTXC0idWknKdIB42NDUv9eV9HUvSjTUbyw9hY3WCUMkee9ef4sJ7XZQWFNv2tvMRm
    Y4jNxjNKkrCuevQ+NTVtIAXz8+GjldtmKLdkmOOep/lcdOROIAOUYuLxWbPuOZ4qF6cFUl11TRW2
    bq0x0ZZRhI6RjkO2BYsLZ2dnrbOOydCNIfuse7rObuInjc3Pz3NuEyEPHU+aTmKKoKVpJW5zhHQs
    0+PxmZNK6/ja8aPdLlpoiBz52Lb7EQmGMTI1gXUVddi++i6zNFndrTSXItx9iSpkhvIDalLo9PSM
    UVke/cYM75kFJ1O2dykgvZDmPd11mgNw3BQjS5aRaZRUV0kLrqqqtI7LAJ7iUdFRcgWRJa9Z04g2
    entNrU0PDTkA2+ibvLjOJfuxODmPFuIA57Gj1E/v++GHH9Lq9+OBB3cT5AWuvYBwOGx86Y6P5Afx
    WPN97uVv9S4jmOae4jzG2pf2UVRcLHx5Ah06lLHE+J9PXxGQcUi53HuKFizDmKEfMAteXFmzyGik
    lFmeDn12wfUzghJVlpaWWu9lHOwCLGAFRB4XrK+rXwRFSvdgdNShCAl4sybtJnm0dMSMx2gJIv7a
    mmrH6jlWli3h//PFA8bltTU12LZtK5qbm7F27dplNHWzdW7lvqhKFpqmLEJVeyguKUaxgewALt8i
    EPNpAAJZe9f25MzkAGMMzxwLXVpRe4zFZoy/s8EXwMFQyOZS72UWPDIyatwiC3QBlqlbzElukXVN
    kNTlNV0rX1rS+aT71dXV5KAt5Esn1PORN4sZm27fvt2ihBjHy5tre1LE8eMncPFiO770xf343Ofu
    u+ncK9e6les0eVsc6tIBN0OnWsT9LY6mvHOy1OgUfHVeBBkGUgB7KEcqo4vTSq3/CqOSBUeJhxSh
    IW5oWkBnWVJSYnMsA1gRhMurDsAB4xIBnJx3nI4WnJ5WWLNitUV5pZyHmTDof2WTw3jm2Wfw4x/9
    BFEKl8twUJLl+HJw48Z1/Nu//wcGBgfxFB2l8eTKCf4X1zpFogjtSyfTT/kUjil5kJKdkCuNSe5L
    ew4VhJxYmXIpTBP/zpJeDOGsPWv/cvRRPl9wKYLjg8F85NFvuG0ZRYyQk7SImt4LwgWmCccp6Ca1
    TY85wlAtO9KwAbfwosTjC7t34/nn/wIb1jdZmKOwRufRS0fH7McyQiUi/1dNACtMs8Y9aS+RwghD
    xAKLmQWcjrsMRy3E4+0aj+4rDJNcQkVjZZkyIlHcxOQE6UPKczGbt1AvEMj7ZIoYHVsCThovIVeJ
    rMVNM+Qb2WwikcIoLT3csJpXv940rru7G339A1QCR3ADCtq3bN5svKfTsGnTRvzVmm/gGNPr148c
    QYYyFpQlpXD27FlTRDjM4/opmwCW41ZzQYoQXMnpp8IXFp+JaxOJOVIEQzUCqIhHfSZppYqFFR3I
    +dbW1KIzfsVoMsqISxmfM7MCIPUJLUt0MhQhbcmBuZYpIPqYf7/00gELRUyrlFDZ2tDQMOrr603o
    lS+a5zRT0kNMoWWxanr/y+e/jvPnL1jerrm1Tgkdzdf+6Gs4cOCHtIZxBuXOgZpkPUTRSjjcuHL6
    3/o6SQcbV5jJI6096PMZKlDxqhIE3RPwcoQKU2XBubTUGAGWQZlytG8DL4iq6kr0D/RR/hkLaSWy
    a8GciiejkJaegXXJyalOIE5xj4cB3NdPa+wxgJz7cnQgXw7x2Nw8BtXYXPKQBJX0qg8I+JaWc3iP
    mxPnEl+sa1qHb37zG7j//p149bXDLPpQIYtxszb7aZtoTiGYC6T2oHCs9cNWLiPu99l+Peyn++qr
    Oossm7xiSslQJnPNMFNzRUIXSAGaa46lgEwjLgpFVSDKDlMzUE8yy9KmXIA1UJ8F1so2ynqFWnZf
    95qyLnGe9XL6yYrFfXrPZXRBWRwF0E5kye7JWRyy7G0mEcd7XW0YY7pdV1qB5vom5LMCd7MmufSv
    Ix6LLQGs/rJKj4CVoItNfROMbESDRXSAKgAJWPV1m7oXFhaifFU5w7Cgs3dNkd2J8xQyBs520EsA
    RxV+xTOAaoFCAqIJVcZTuulEjQpdoiZAmMdpbILHjH8SIJlMGIfK8xr4JsACNeo3/lWGl7EIDlB4
    lCB4yh7d++6GbDwvZulUj5x/F+9cPs85vchnweXGxBge285wzu2ceXdS2Esdl/D33/1Hey7qSfL0
    WF+umUMFVygGpn8YIyUmKAMnzqTEZfQ54mGJvrIVMbwrKi4yByn/osTIbeJoRSjiaR9PqNsyn3p7
    +0zjrsWq7nDfzp346leftXLcu+RVHXlFrwJQU9fV1WBoZNjus6ZDOrmKb3/7bxlqfUxQafnckPip
    oqICZWVlqKyscoC33XowyH5/953vYGRk3OGtRYXk8QjKW0voidg02vt74BetEGCVCq8MDTBtnsSq
    8Ip6BOcVV8qXyE8IVY1x9ySLFoBPP/Uk0+IADrIS2MXCkp7rmRIftXxaqFmMXTkvXlYLi4oKDVyB
    6GVlbz4tirDNmIEoMQuFBLDjSzQy86mjo8OOqSzJrInvmkiWpJBG2tJ9hVVKNOR19+59mLzpZxCv
    mhctmEq50tlFy6RV80aKQisz+oPH9llWuPnuu6Gaso6jwFP409PTb6GOW7PQGs3NW1lnLTPhfVxf
    m9P8aguc2CfQ+O/c4D3yo6I9k51Xklk86HC9k5U6sqtG7TeaEhjifBvDNRU1KGKQQbgW7D4T+CpV
    WmjHeUtLSs2AhIXbZ4H4KFtVHOwqVPJlLLh/YNA8qCO1E/PpSKgV8z0Uyl/GLcPDI9iz5yH86Z88
    h9cO/ZTWOGBxrYBIpz0ENBdNjWuYNDxpWZ3mqagot/6vvPIq2i+1kfNmscDjq/7irVWryrD787tZ
    C95LkBwAVeTZRs5969I5xFlwKQjkY311PUpZ6pS1KkvM57cLyqJkrb+pydEKJFGVTonKkwpBBYie
    CWROQx4uNONy5xKQkXDEUmwpTtmt6FPri2rUNL6Up07FMZfedN95yg/j4+N0rJlLPbPO2ri8sOvV
    pTH1k7OScGp63tPTY9GFNqoMqZxgrmlstH7WKetFwojXBxgGxuNzVoAvjBSigdYtZa5scyxut5Em
    xmNRVBaWWkUtlxtVU5wr7y+5/qemPirIK9OSU9W47GhIJ0UWLotV1pndVGgPETwpQ2M0VnSVDZm4
    Vxa86LDriNOvf2WUPemdz58KAQP4N5+pTzX/ncFCYBnA8tgX+rowyfebNR3EUXrwScaMnTcGMDY9
    +YldxVsdg72YZtU/Tmc2wXLg72PLABxl0eKV99/C5Wu9+NF7P8P4jFP8WAmKisutfVfQPTSIj8dH
    CfRiIWVFR31L3Dt2nV8zJXB9YhStvR+t6PH7cZmJIkZpiT5WtL5y70NmoQro1QRO22APvwX2YlN1
    I0rovZ0wyYe7qupQQA8u59E7eh2d1wfs2+K1lbWoLV6FLbVrrXDS3t2N4egE+keHUFVcSssfRO/w
    NX4FH8TWuiboa5qrQ9cxOUul0mtE8kK4OnIN6yvrUV9WcVtrImPBSkGVfr567m0UMVjO4+eBsSG8
    9sE7KA1FEMzNw+HWdwnUpOsl8cHVyxihYtoHr+IUM62qojKOLcCpX12gYsbQ0nUJMwl+FcOQKKD0
    mEHKeVLQBz2XUU0FxBkBaM4Jfmv7Vsc59HO9ENdp6elgElFkScZtjS6Fz1iwfqfw5R0P4vXW0/jB
    6eN4dudeAvgr7LqrGXfXNvJLP5b3fH5c7O9kuurUARR3KmRpp4Xv43dm7je9W+rWMj1lTElEAxzT
    WFYJ/UygmIo609WOR7bca331o5LTH10kLQ3YtdYKUrH6Fc8cC/z3NGy83fFdcnJxZl+KX5/4zC4D
    sm2g2+LdEK1PTfUGbT7Fnzqx4JVpyshUw7XK2eJdzaN/NTlFfWfFnMe54uAAY1E1xdN5VJZ+EeNj
    6pnLGDPI9fZt2UnnOYXjbSwr2jjrflu+ZCji7cuteOPCL825KbAXRYhzdX84Oo5r5OL3uzuwoaqB
    GxVYaipw+LF6VRVO8KdNcozqe+ziWePx7MRFUYVS1zImFO9wzvGZKHqGrqFn5GM0ldfyqxsqjkqc
    jseMmjbWrMakvs29hQTCkeV38zUD8Bc2bDdH9DeHX0Q4EMT6qnqsrajBZjqq7534L7x46iiaG9ah
    oazKfqqUl5uDUIDFaVrdjrWb6JiC+IdjL+Nff3HEOFzOUGmtqEfZk+YUD+9Ys8ms+btHf4wT7e/j
    Aa5bwjRUztLLIokqX6c723Dg3WPYTKrJ1Bx+N/G7I9UdBP6fI/DfhAFp/fGsdx4AAAAASUVORK5C
    YII=

    ——=_NextPart_000_004A_01CB4378.FBA78F30–

  • Cluedo

    @343
    Care to link? :)

  • some_findings

    afaik noone has cracked the 2 pswdd files:
    “132 O2 Digi Protect RESULTS.xlsx” and “681 Be Digi Protect RESULTS.xlsx”.

    uses aes-128 encryption, .xlsx is generally more secure than .xls. suggest using a cloud service. or guessing based on the previous batch of files with passwordds:

    in email subject: “Passwords from Ruth Brooks”

    Passwords in order from 1 to 8:

    667IAno40of2009
    1IAno40of2009
    16IAno40of2009
    23IAno40of2009
    185IAno40of2009
    196IAno40of2009
    350IAno40of2009
    7078IAno40of2009

    in other news, bbc news reported today: “Copy of 03-06-10_EVIDENZIA_CENTRAL DATABASE_ADVISORS & SUPERVISORS_2.xls”
    which has 8039 entries, from around 2009 related to music copyright. It has 237 logs of phone calls/letters/payments from around June 2010, all for settlement value 295GBP.

  • Court Clerk

    667IAno40of2009
    1IAno40of2009
    16IAno40of2009
    23IAno40of2009
    185IAno40of2009
    196IAno40of2009
    350IAno40of2009
    7078IAno40of2009

    This is the case number taken from the top right of each Court Order relating to the disclosure.

    Easy…

  • FuzzyX

    The one thing you can say about this ACS:Law email breach is that it is huge.

    As Privacy International said then they had never before seen someone break almost every part of the Data Protection Act at the same time.

  • jose

    This has caught out a lot of English.Sheep.Shaggers I know in London.
    They are too thick to use smarter methods and got caught downloading their porn and music on torrents.
    It’s like a list of Darwin Award winners.

  • Anonymous4Ever

    Muahaha! For those interested in Be Unlimited details. I havent cracked the password but I have found a list of IP addresses.

    Dont worry if you havent downloaded porn as these are all porn related downloads.

    Goto the folder of
    .jmiller@acs-law_co_uk/.terence@acs-law_co_uk/cur

    email is dated 07/04/2010 and subject starts with Be Unlimted so easy to find.

    Note no names or addresses on this one as this is just the IP list they sent to BE to have them fill in with names etc. So if your IP is dynamic and not changed for some time you can check.

  • some_findings

    plain greed..

    Jonathan

    I really do not agree.

    Yes, we may have dropped for compassionate reasons and yet they have continued to allow their internet account be used to infringe copyright. I would say that that discounts them for second “compassionate” consideration.

    Regarding the negative PR of course there will be negative PR, although it would be difficult to find any positive PR for our current activities, but we should have a process of handling that. It may be that a special Letter of Claim is developed which has wording to the effect of:

    “Despite the fact that a previous claim by our client for infringement of their copyright was dropped as a result of your submissions we note that you have continued to allow your internet connection to be used for the purpose of infringement of our clients rights.”


    24/08/2010

    1. Recoveries have dramatically slowed down, therefore Andrew stated that there is an urgency to get the new LoCs out asap.

    their plan.
    1. send as many locs (letters of claims) as possible.
    2. a few people stupidly pay up, despite noone having ever been taken to court over it.
    3. profit!?

  • some_findings
  • Anonymous

    @ 346 by some_findings

    Passwords

    “suggest using a cloud service”

    Try getting /g/ on the case?

    They may not have the dedication or the numbers (or quite the same mental instability) of /b/ but a few of them at least have a clue and might be able to put something together.

  • Violated

    The court order for these O2/BE ones was numbered I/A No. 30 of 2010. So that password goes…

    ????IAno30of2010

    The ???? is a number between 1 and 9999. I currently do not know what this number relates to so many combinations to try. There may be a 5th figure but unlikely.

    So if it follows the expected format then only a matter of time before opened. It could have also changed since 2009 when no 2010 passwords seen yet.

    If access is soon obtained then that would be due to a series of related passwords. At least in this case they had them phone for the password(s) thus avoiding an email leak. Acceptable security.

  • Cluedo

    Tried a brute-force using this password convention – n/a!

    I don’t think these 2 files will be cracked. :(

  • Anonymous

    any open source tools to brute-force xlsx files?

  • Violated

    As long as you did not pad the unknown number then time for plan b.

    In the email received it did not repeat the 30 of 2010 as mentioned by the NPO. Instead it incorrectly stated 4 of 2010.

    So try…
    ????IAno4of2010

    And…
    ????IAno04of2010

    This would be like…
    1IAno4of2010
    to…
    99999IAno4of2010

    It is there somewhere unless they changed the format. Good luck.

  • Retired Hacker

    The goal of this experiment should be to expose weak security and to name and shame the organizations involved.

    Hundreds more people using O2 and BE wont appreciate having their details exposed.

    So if fair guessing based on exposed previous passwords fail to work then having to brute force these two files serves no gain beyond proving that their security was strong enough.

    Had this not been public then what a hacker would have done now is to phone up BBC Legal saying “ACS:Law employee here. Got a problem with these latest spreadsheets you sent. Can you repeat the key?”

    Put on a good show and guess what. Cant do that now. LOL

  • Anonymous

    ACS aren’t the only ones doing this. Here’s a story from techeye.net (http://www.techeye.net/business/london-law-firm-pledges-to-continue-targeting-file-sharers)

    “London law firm pledges to continue targeting file-sharers
    Not put off by ACS: Law debacle
    30 Sep 2010 17:43 | by Linda Harrison

    A firm of London solicitors has said the controversy surrounding ACS:Law will not stop it from targeting those accused of file-sharing.

    Gallant Macmillan told the BBC it still planned to go to the High Court on 4 October to seek the personal details of hundreds of PlusNet users.

    Simon Gallant told BBC News that he had “no problem” pursuing legal claims.

    The comments came after thousands of customer details were leaked online after a security breach at ACS:Law, with ISPs pledging to take a tougher stand with law firms pursuing ‘anti-piracy’ claims.

    Gallant Macmillan is reported to be seeking a court order from BT subsidiary PlusNet to get it to hand over the personal details of a “large number” of broadband users that it suspects of illegally downloading and sharing music from the record label Ministry of Sound.

    The hearing is due to be heard before Chief Master Winegarten at the High Court.

    According to the BBC, Gallant Macmillan sends out letters to users suspected of illegal file sharing – a method similar to that used by ACS:Law.

    The letter asks for “compensation and costs” of £350 and asks the recipient to sign an undertaking not to do it again.

    BT confirmed yesterday that it sent customer details to ACS:Law in unencrypted Exel spreadsheets as email attachments.

    A PlusNet spokesperson told BBC News that ACS:Law’s actions had “undermined the current legal process”.

    They added: “It’s in everyone’s interests to restore confidence in this process so that broadband users are safeguarded and we are determined to do this.

    “We are actively reviewing our approach to these disclosure requests to achieve this objective and this will inform our approach to Monday’s hearing”.

    Mr Gallant told the BBC that, as far as he was concerned, “nothing has changed” and the company was proceeding with the application and hoped to obtain a list of customers suspected of illegal file sharing.

    He said: “I am aware this type of work is contentious and we have done a great deal of due diligence and are aware of all the concerns people have raised.

    “Providing a rights holder can prove to me that they have a valid legal claim, why should I – as a solicitor – have any problem representing them?”

    TechEye tried to contact Mr Gallant today but we were told he was too busy to take our call. ”

    Lovely people.

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous next target: Gallant Macmillan
    Website: http://www.gmlegal.co.uk/

    Go take them down :P

  • Anonymous

    LOL, how about some anons put on some V masks and hang outside Gallant Macmillan offices whilst stroking their chins and moving their gaze from the offices to each other :D

    Address for Gallant Macmillan:
    3 Greek Street
    Soho
    London W1D 4DA

  • Anonymous

    http://www.gmlegal.co.uk/

    What a cheap and tacky website. Doesnt look professional at all.

    I didnt realise poundland were selling websites hehe.

  • Pay Back is a Biatch…

    Has anyone read the email concerning MONEY LAUNDERING yet ?

    It is an email between a female in germany acting on behalf of Dj Shaun Baker and Andrew Crossley. They talk about how much they are getting and details of how to transfer funds etc then mentions how they need the I.D numbers for money laundering purposes…

    Not sure if they are joking or telling the truth but there is nothing there to suggest they are joking about it !!

  • A Person

    File: “File Sharing Litigation – An Overview – Shaun Baker.doc” in /mail/acs-law.co.uk/andrew.crossley/cur

    Part of the file quotes the following:
    ======================
    Example A: Case Dropped (Costs Insured)
    Proceedings are issued against A who has never responded but there is evidence of multiple instances of infringement. Court fee is £300. A then puts in the wireless defence, making it necessary to drop the proceedings in the absence of any further incriminating evidence. Provided the insurance premium of c.£750 has been paid (which is payable by the Claimant only), the wasted court fee of £300, together with any costs incurred by the defendant (eg. his own solicitors’ costs) which a court may order the Claimant to pay (e.g. £500), will be paid by the policy of insurance (where there is no insurance in place, these would be payable by the Claimant only). Total outlay by Claimant: £750. Net gain (or loss): £50.
    ======================

  • A Person

    From “Retainer letter for Contentious Work – Sebastian Wolter.doc”

    File Sharing Litigation: ‘Various’ (“the Work(s)”)
    Contentious Work

    I am writing to confirm that we shall be pleased to act for your company (“Claimant”/”your company”) in connection with the above matter and in relation to any court proceedings which may be issued (“Contentious Work”) under a collective conditional fee (or ‘no win, no fee’) arrangement. This letter (“Contentious Retainer”) and the Terms of Engagement (sent to you under separate cover), which we are required to send you under the rules of the Solicitors Regulation Authority, set out the basis on which the work will be carried out.
    Scope of the work
    We have agreed that we will take action against file sharers and that the work will involve:
    obtaining a disclosure order from the court to compel the ISPs to release the names and addresses.
    challenging any order for costs made against ISPs, or the level of their charges;
    commencing proceedings against the file sharers, including the issuing of proceedings, in such amounts as we shall determine in our discretion and in consultation with you (although this will not usually be less than five and up to one hundred (100) cases in any three month period) to include drafting, issuing and serving the claim forms and particulars of claim
    preparing applications for and obtaining default judgments in respect of those defendants who did not file an acknowledgment of service or a defence in respect of the claims
    drafting and filing a defence to any counterclaim made by any of the defendants
    Drafting and filing a consent order to withdraw the claim and dismiss the defendant’s counterclaim (where appropriate)
    Attending before the judge on an application for summary judgement (contested or uncontested) to obtain judgement
    Preparing for and attending the hearing in relation to an enquiry as to damages (where applicable)
    Preparing papers for enforcement of damages and/or costs, including instructing a bailiff where necessary
    In rare cases, preparing for and attending a trial. We do not presently anticipate (but cannot guarantee) that more than 1-2 cases would go to trial in a sample of about one hundred test cases, so the risk is low.
    appealing any decision made by a court against the Claimant arising from a claim made against an infringer.
    We will issue a new wave of proceedings against another batch file sharers in relation to infringement of copyright in the Work(s). The work to be carried out will be the same as that described above. We will publicise prominent judgements from time to time which should help to increase the recovery rate.

  • Pay Back is a Biatch…

    The other part where the female and Crossley are exchanging chat…

  • Me

    Has anyone seen the Stacey Birdsey and Dan Walsh relationship – it’s blossoming …

    Dan will know hat’s going on for sure:

    DAN WALSH
    OCTOPUS COMMUNICATIONS

    T: 08453 700655 | M: 07827 816 971 | http://WWW.OCTOPUSCOMMS.NET | SKYPE: DANIEL.WALSH7 | TWITTER: @DWA1SH

    BUSINESS MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS CAMPAIGN, WINNER, PR WEEK AWARDS 2009
    TECHNOLOGY CAMPAIGN, HIGHLY COMMENDED, PR WEEK AWARDS 2009

  • Me

    This is an email to Stacey:

    Was she been hassled?

    ——————–

    Hi Stacey,
    § Give these a look.
    §
    § You could refer to the Malicious Communications Act 1988. This deals with the sending of letters or articles for the purpose of causing “distress or anxiety”. A person found guilty can be fined in the Magistrates Court. To prosecute successfully, the letter or article sent would have to convey:- A message which is indecent or grossly offensive or a threat; or Information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender.
    o
    § The Criminal Justice Act & Public Order Act 1994 Section 4a makes it a criminal offence to cause “Harassment, alarm or distress” with intent by using “threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour”. This can only be an offence if it happens in a public place not in your own home. The police would need to be contacted and prosecute for this offence.
    §
    § The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 makes it a criminal offence to harass people and put “people in fear of violence”. The harassment must happen on at least 2 separate occasions. The police would have to agree to prosecute for this offence.

    Daryl Blake
    File-Sharing Team

    —————

    Ask Debbie: 07506 736732

  • Me

    More

    From Andy Wandy – wait for this:

    To: Stacey

    Subject Re: M2DA10825438_Stylianou_SSB

    Sender Andrew Crossley

    Date 08.06.2010 17:27

    Drop this. I always appreciate it when people put some genuine effort into the responses they give.

    Regards

    Andrew

  • Anonymous

    From: acslawlm@gmail.com
    Re: URGENT: New Data Request – Phase 3
    To: jonathan.miller@acs-law.co.uk andrew.crossley@acs-law.co.uk

    Hi Both

    Please find attached 2 X Agreements submitted to you for review and approval for Shaun Baker and Sebastian Wolter owners of the Copyright for the song “POWER” – Evidenzia. The attached docs are:

    1. File sharing Litigation – an Overview.
    2. Retainer letter for Contentious Work
    3. Retainer letter for Non-Contentious Work.
    4. Collective Conditional Fee Agreement.

    Once approved we need to email them to the clients’ and I can post the hard-copies to Germany – I have placed 2 copies of the hard copies on your desk Andrew.

    Jon, once sent, we will be waiting for various docs from these two clients i.e.signed pages plus docs such as chain of title and ID information for money laundering purposes

    Thanks
    Leyla

  • Pingback: Online Global Week in Review 1 October 2010 from IP Think Tank

  • Anonymous

    …….:::::::: WANKERS Proudly Present :::::::…….

    ACS:Law’s ‘Share This, Get Sued’ Forbidden Music Pack

    DiRECTORY NAME: ACS.Law.Forbidden.Music.Pack.READNFO-WANKERS

    http://acslaw.blogspot.com/2010/09/breaking-news-pirates-release-acslaw.html

  • Anonymous

    That greedy fat pig Crossley and anyone else who does his bidding, even by answering the telephone, should be locked up for extortion.

    What they are doing is criminal!

    I don’t just want him struck off, fined £500,000 and sued for liable, I want him to receive a considerable jail term. He should experience some of the hell that he has put OAPs and single mothers through. Bastard!

    We need to get the momentum going on this for as long as it takes!

  • ACS

    I phoned ACS this afternoon to clarify their address regarding a legal complaint I am making through my solicitor. It was like business as usual. I wonder if they are still receiving the cheques and direct debits. We need to get the information out to people to stop paying if they already are. Cancel their direct debits and tell ACS law where they can stick their “legal action”. I suppose it is good that the office is open in a way because it means Mr Crossley will still have to be paying their wages.

  • CrossleyIsAWanker

    Came across fatboy Crossley’s Linkedin profile: http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-crossley/9/610/777

    Seems he was MacDonald’s employee of the month in 1979. At least he won’t need retraining when he starts back there! If they’ll give him his job back that is!

  • Pingback: 4chan all’assalto degli avvoltoi del copiright |

  • Anonymous

    Why not join the anti-ACS:Law Facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/pages/ACSLaw-cannot-be-trusted/121547364567738?ref=ts

    Please invite all your friends!

    Let’s send Crossley back to the gutter from where he crawled!

  • Anonymous

    Been chatting to one of AJC’s employees today. Needless to say they hate him! Or so they say.. I did give them a pretty hard time for working for him. I think they are coming on board and are going to dig some real dirt on the parasitic wanker! They’re going to make contact next week. Let’s put this shitheel behind bars where he belongs!

  • .

    Rob Manuel of B3ta.com, a British website founded on similar, albeit more whimsical lines, says 4chan’s success has been founded on turning “trolling” – essentially, annoying other internet users – into an art form.

    “It’s the equivalent of all the kids at the back of the classroom passing each other notes and being sarcastic,” he adds.

    “Essentially, it’s about taking trolling to the nth degree and saying: ‘Let’s put all the trolls in one place and see what happens.’”
    Funny how some trolls’ are legion, yet some are sad losers

  • Court Clerk

    @373

    I’m not sure if you could expect any different behavour.

    I think the things that will sink Andrew’s boat are more likely to be the professional offences.

    You see as a sole practitioner he is always going to be under the gaze of the SRA and his professional indemnity insurance.

    The most revealing things from this leak are not to do with File Sharing but his conduct in other cases he handels and

    how he runs his practice.

    For example he bounces cheques !

    He misses Direct Debits !

    His client account goes in to OD ! WTF

    Not the sign of a well run practice.

    Hope the SRA are watching !

  • JohnMartin

    He told the BBC:

    “All our evidence does is identify an internet connection that has been utilised to share copyright work,” he told BBC News when pressed about the lists of personal data. “In relation to the individual names, these are just the names and addresses of the account owner and we make no claims that they themselves were sharing the files,”

    He told the High Court:

    For the purposes of this witness statement, I shall use the word “User” to describe those persons whom it is alleged are acting unlawfully and which will include the following: a user of a host computer (as defined in paragraph 17 below), a subscriber to a P2P file sharing network (“”PP network”), a subscriber to one of the Respondent lSPs and “the alleged wrongdoer”, all of whom are likely to be the same person (subject to anything to the contrary that may be said in defence).

    So when it comes to publicising confidential data, he is making no claims that the connection subscriber is the file sharer, but when he is bamboozling Chief Master Winegarten, he is saying that is is likely that the connection subscriber is the filesharer.

  • Pingback: Agggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous
  • Phlox

    If you need good independent talent to watch, it’s right there on Youtube.. no need to go to the labels ;)

    Kurthugoschneider is a great producer, subscribe to his channel on there. Sam Tsui, Jake Bruen and Frank Sacramone are in this team of talented people.. this is where we should be looking for the faces of tomorrow.. and.. it’s free to watch on Youtube :D

    http://www.youtube.com/my_subscriptions?pi=0&ps=20&sf=added&sa=0&dm=2&s=pf0fkT_SKYJHGcvuL2rzB1TFI816ogdB84I2YEBTsxA&as=1

    I have no connection to these people, I thought everyone here deserves a link to good stuff.. hey, one of the tracks is free to download ;)

  • Phlox

    Oops, gave you my subscription link… perhaps this one would be better.. http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=kurthugoschneider&aq=0

  • Anonymous

    Proof that ACS:Law DID NOT and CAN NOT stop sharing, employing these firms is futile

    http://acslaw.blogspot.com/2010/10/filewatch-proof-that-acslaw-did-not-and_06.html

  • Pingback: Abmahnungen – Nur damit Sie wissen, mit wem Sie es zutun haben… | Onlinerecht Blog

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.