MediaDefender’s Decoy Effectiveness on BitTorrent Sites

Written by Ernesto on September 22, 2007 

MediaDefender’s email and anti piracy tool leaks gave the world a unique insight into the workings and the effectiveness of their BitTorrent decoy operations. So how effective were they? And which sites were best protected against these fake torrents? Let’s find out.

MediaDefender's Decoy Effectiveness on BitTorrent SitesMediaDefender determines the effectiveness of their spoofs and decoys by analyzing the top search results for the file in question, mostly movies and music albums. If 2 out of 10 top search results are fake files spread by them, their effectiveness is 20% on that particular BitTorrent site. Their goals is of course to get as many fake files in there, hoping people will end up downloading useless data.

There is a lot of variance in the reported effectiveness between BitTorrent sites and the different decoy projects. We scanned through most of the reports and it seems that The Pirate Bay and Mininova were best protected against fake files whereas MediaDefender was more effective on sites like BiteNova and TorrentPortal.

Niek from Mininova, the toughest site to get onto according to MediaDefender, wrote a blog post in response to the leaked MediaDefender emails. He sums up some of the quotes that show how well protected Mininova is. Niek adds, “We can only be grateful for the many nice words from our friends at MediaDefender. All thanks go to our great moderating team, who did (and do) great work.”

The Pirate Bay has always been one of MediaDefender’s main targets because this site is often mentioned in the press. Unfortunately for MediaDefender The Pirate Bay is also one of the sites that is well protected against fake files.

In July, Brokep from The Pirate Bay already told us that they were doing all they can to block Media Defender from accessing their trackers. “We block them and some other torrent sites do as well.” he said.

This apparently annoyed MediaDefender, as we can see from one of their emails regarding the effectiveness of their decoys for Micheal Moore’s Sicko: “we still have no presence on Pirate bay which is a site they [Weinstein?] are likely watching as it was mentioned in the AdAge article they referenced.”

Here is an example of an effectiveness report for “Fantastic 4: Rise of the Silver Surfer” based on the top search results. Note that an effectiveness of 100% means that all the torrents that showed up in the search results (top 6/10/15) were fake.

BiteNova: 100%
Bittorrent.am 27%
Btjunkie 20%
Btmon 15%
BushTorrent 100%
ExtraTorrent 47%
Fenopy 100%
FlixFlux 23%
FullDLS 32%
IsoHunt 100%
Meganova 100%
Mininova 0%
Monova 35%
MyBittorrent 91%
NewTorrents 0%
Novatina 98%
PirateBay 0%
Snarf-it 74%
TorrentBox 32%
TorrentLocomotive 47%
TorrentPortal 100%
TorrentReactor 0%
TorrentSpy 4%
TorrentValley 77%
TorrentView 27%
Torrentz 22%
Underground 0%
WorldNova 97%
Yotoshi 92%

Previously: PirateBay Fires a Broadside of Complaints to Police

Next: Porn Industry Infighting As Pirate Bay Takes On Big Media

50 Responses

1 Sep 22, 2007 at 19:55 by Noby

Any word why MD-D’s irc channel is down?

2 Sep 22, 2007 at 20:20 by Cartman

it’s not

3 Sep 22, 2007 at 20:33 by Capmaster

Are any of these private trackers?

4 Sep 22, 2007 at 20:37 by The entire P2P community is speaking in this one message

[wuote]Are any of these private trackers?[/wuote]

No; They’re not even all trackers, some are just index sites.

5 Sep 22, 2007 at 20:38 by ScarT

#1 IRC works fine. I am on it right now.

6 Sep 22, 2007 at 20:38 by The entire P2P community is speaking in this one message

Wuote? Oh, you mean Quote? Yes, I do, thanks for noticing. No problem man.Ok, bye. Bye.

7 Sep 22, 2007 at 22:03 by l0gikal

How do I see the archived comments in the original blog post about MD? It says 212 comments, but I can only see 108??

8 Sep 22, 2007 at 22:43 by Noby

The server I used was down, switched to another and could access the channel.

Sorry for the disturbance.

9 Sep 22, 2007 at 22:44 by h33t

on topic:

bittorrent is self-verifying if downloaders leave comments and the index is moderated

torrent moderation really makes the difference. in their rush to get big many sites lost it

10 Sep 22, 2007 at 23:57 by Angel

Demoioid not even mentioned? Wow! I’m offended! :-)

11 Sep 23, 2007 at 00:05 by sense

Keep in mind that TPB and mininova both order search results by date added instead of high seeds, which is why they effectively pass the mediadefender ranks.

12 Sep 23, 2007 at 00:31 by aodm

i wonder if the asstunnels are reading this.

hi media defender! post some more emails. i need another good laugh.

so whats it like to be so totally screwed? tell us. we’re intrested.

13 Sep 23, 2007 at 01:42 by Asstunnel #1 (That CEO Dude?! Or the Dr Octapus guy? WHO AM I!?!)

[quote]i wonder if the asstunnels are reading this.[/quote]

Yep, we’re here :D Oh, wait, that’s wrong… We’re very sad :( But we’re still here :(

We’re sad because we did bad things to fight against freedom but for corporate profit. And now we got punished.

14 Sep 23, 2007 at 01:44 by %20

I’m interested in collecting these spoofing files, anyone have any tips on what to look for? anyone got any and want to share?

15 Sep 23, 2007 at 02:41 by Yatti

[quote comment="171076"]I’m interested in collecting these spoofing files, anyone have any tips on what to look for? anyone got any and want to share?[/quote]

They are out there… You’ll get an “eye” for them eventually.. MediaDefender can suck my *** **** since im in Canada anyways…

16 Sep 23, 2007 at 03:13 by Jimbo

[quote comment="171107"][quote comment="171076"]I’m interested in collecting these spoofing files, anyone have any tips on what to look for? anyone got any and want to share?[/quote]

They are out there… You’ll get an “eye” for them eventually.. MediaDefender can suck my *** **** since im in Canada anyways…[/quote]

Yes…. the MediaDefender files should be left on all bittorrent sites and COLORED RED with a frowney MD face next to it…LOL@Asstunnels

17 Sep 23, 2007 at 04:03 by WASD

who is that butt ugly people in the pic??

18 Sep 23, 2007 at 04:19 by Name

Ah, the existing business model for film and TV is so fucked. Can’t wait till the smoke has cleared. The RIAA and MPA think piracy is going to kill the entertainment industry. But film and music will still be made – and whatever is produced under the future models could hardly be worse than the crap being made right now.

19 Sep 23, 2007 at 04:35 by Dan

I wonder what percentage of all torrent data is fake. An moreso, how pissed off comcast is that media defender is intentionally clogging their tubes.

20 Sep 23, 2007 at 04:54 by Demonnnn

how about ole demonoid? any word on them?

21 Sep 23, 2007 at 05:22 by The Profit

i have one word to say……

“Karma”

look it up you capitalistic **** **** ******** ****** ******* ******** ********** ****** bastards.
Go **** yourselves.

Long live P2P! A freedom that will not be silenced.

22 Sep 23, 2007 at 07:12 by dripsta23

demonoid is the safest and then mininova!!!!

23 Sep 23, 2007 at 07:19 by people

hum weird bushtorrent & torrentreactor are actually the same torrent DB why is it 100% effective on 1 but not the other?? Also yotoshi is a search engine it doesnt even have torrents does it?

24 Sep 23, 2007 at 08:52 by WiWsta

Too all the torrent trackers that got 0% fake files, good job!

25 Sep 23, 2007 at 09:17 by Ragjaryy

Yay for Canada! Media Defender can’t touch me. Ize getz to gloatz all I want. Sux2bu, MediaDefender. By the way they aren’t defending shit, it’s the same as giving crack to someone then arresting him for illegal possession.

…By the way who wants to join in a huge DOS attack against MediaDefender? Just to screw them over. Come on guys, it’ll be fun!111oneone

26 Sep 23, 2007 at 09:26 by Noby

@23:

Maybe they ran the sampling tests not at the same time, thus the fake torrents were allready purged from the database when the did the second test on the other site.

27 Sep 23, 2007 at 09:40 by ELCouz

Quote:
who is that butt ugly people in the pic??

Actually is the CEO of MediaDefender
Randy Saaf and his associate..

Quote:
MediaDefender boss Randy Saaf (left) and sidekick Octavio Herrera are being questioned by Las Vegas Police.

SOURCE see here: http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13397

28 Sep 23, 2007 at 09:41 by ELCouz

Quote:
who is that butt ugly people in the pic??

Actually is the CEO of MediaDefender
Randy Saaf and his associate..

Quote:
MediaDefender boss Randy Saaf (left) and sidekick Octavio Herrera are being questioned by Las Vegas Police.

SOURCE see here: p2pnet.net/story/13397

29 Sep 23, 2007 at 12:05 by whatveer

he looks like a condescending prick.
funny how stuff like that seeps through a photo.

30 Sep 23, 2007 at 13:34 by UuU

The picture at the top is photoshopped to make them have sad faces, just like the photo on the p2pnet article photoshops handcuffs around their arms.

31 Sep 23, 2007 at 16:05 by Schlage

If they spoof big torrents on shitty trackers its not a big problem cause those trackers are usually there to find something rather rare, whereas for something popular pirate bay is always the way to go

32 Sep 23, 2007 at 16:19 by xxdesmus

Glad to see my personal favorite (Demonoid) is no where even on that list.

I hope these asshats learn a lesson. You cannot possibly win against all of us. Hundreds of millions (if not billions) of people are going to do exactly what they want to do…and there isn’t a damn thing you can do about it.

33 Sep 23, 2007 at 18:26 by murd

haha it amazes me that they judge their effectiveness by the top 10 of the crappy public torrent sites. learn to scratch beneath the surface…so many great private trackers with better quality files, speeds, and any user uploading decoys or fakes would be banned within about 2 minutes.

So funny that they failed miserable at sabotaging those public sites, imagine them trying to make an impact on the private bittorrent scene, haha and much repect to tpb for sticking it to them

34 Sep 23, 2007 at 18:55 by Zennalathas

How does SuperNova rank on the fake scale?

35 Sep 23, 2007 at 20:34 by nasagov

IRC works fine , get on efnet, then /join #mediadefender-defenders

36 Sep 23, 2007 at 20:40 by MDD

The original archives (all) plus a variety of similar legal case documents (1991-current) are available http/ftp and local torrent tracker for all files from

http://MDD.BlueNorway.Org

MDD.BlueNorway.Org

37 Sep 24, 2007 at 00:01 by josh

35 Sep 23, 2007 at 20:34 by nasagov

IRC works fine , get on efnet, then /join #mediadefender-defenders

in what network?

38 Sep 24, 2007 at 00:51 by hoodlum

[quote]in what network?[/quote]
he said efnet..

39 Sep 24, 2007 at 01:41 by TorrentSpamDude

Hopefully this can motivate the vulnerable sites to take action so that this problem will not happen again.

Any of the site admins are welcome to use TorrentSpam.com to report fake torrents.

Sorry for the shameless plug ;-)

40 Sep 24, 2007 at 09:43 by Tekk

I’m glad they liked my photoshop. :)

Great article once again, TF!

41 Sep 26, 2007 at 00:48 by nb

Their figures are INCORRECT.

BushTorrent 100%
TorrentReactor 0%

^– The above makes NO sense seeing as bushtorrent and torrentreactor share the SAME database. Id 1234 at bushtorrent is the same as id 1234 at torrent reactor.

Makes me wonder how in the hell they we’re really calulating that.

42 Sep 26, 2007 at 08:43 by Strat

Maybe, as someone mentioned earlier, BushTorrent lists their search results by speed rather than date posted. That would explain why the same DB gives different results.

43 Oct 02, 2007 at 19:08 by mediarebender

Actually, the top 10 on public sites is as far as most people will ever look. They’re targetting mainstream unsavvy users, not you – keep that in mind. As a general rule of any large-scale effort for that matter.

44 Oct 26, 2007 at 02:21 by absolutroot

ultimately ineffective. fantastic four 4 voted gayest movie of the year by most techies. try faking something people might actually want to download.

45 Jan 05, 2008 at 17:17 by SADIQ

[quote comment="170998"]on topic:

bittorrent is self-verifying if downloaders leave comments and the index is moderated

torrent moderation really makes the difference. in their rush to get big many sites lost it[/quote]

46 Mar 01, 2008 at 19:29 by pai gow gioco d azzardo cinese giochi casin online

NASAs!saddens inhibits?guaranteer,slaying courtly puff

47 Mar 02, 2008 at 04:11 by Van

“Their goals is of course to get as many fake files in there, hoping people will end up downloading useless data.”

@ Ernesto. Don’t forget, they know that even if you end up getting the file, you will have already wasted much bandwidth, time, and money on fake data, which is cool too. They hope it might even stress you out so much it will cause a stroke or coronary.

Preview video, check songs within torrents by playing right through. Report on bad files if possible.

48 Mar 21, 2008 at 07:43 by directoire des sites de jeux de hasard en ligne

tariff biscuit Hanoverizes,flagellate?programmer.stake Judaica

49 May 30, 2008 at 21:54 by giochi di casin

Doreen Ripley worthy diffusible:Bolshevik … Thanks!!!

50 Jul 25, 2008 at 11:40 by Anonymous

outlawed purple impractical?foundries!indifferent – Tons of interesdting stuff!!!

Responses are closed

All remaining responses will continue to be archived. Use the TorrentFreak forums if you want to discuss something.