TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Mother Who Banned File-Sharing Still Held Responsible

A mother who doesn’t understand computers and forbade her children from downloading and sharing music on the Internet has been held responsible for their actions. A court in Germany ruled that parents simply banning file-sharing is not enough, and this has to be followed up to check compliance.

Following accusations from record labels that their copyrighted works were being made available via a file-sharing network from a specific IP-address, the companies managed to obtain the identity of the person who paid for the Internet connection in question.

The subscriber, the mother of several young children, was taken to court by four record companies on allegations that around 1000 music tracks had been made available on her connection.

The woman said that although she was the owner of the connection, she had no idea about computers and file-sharing. She denied carrying out any infringements but suggested that one of her children could have been responsible.

The plaintiffs hoped the court would find the defendant liable as “Mitstörer”, which means that although the woman did not directly commit the infringements, it’s possible she could be held responsible for not taking measures to stop them.

The Higher Regional Court of Cologne decided that even though the woman did not carry out the infringements and even forbade the use of file-sharing networks, parents still have a responsibility to monitor the behavior of their children, or take measures to ensure that file-sharing sites are blocked. This considered, the Court ruled in favor of the record companies.

This court case was about recovering the legal costs for bringing the copyright claim, which are calculated based on the value of the alleged infringements. The claim was for 1,000 violations at 50 euros per track (a value set by the court) which comes to a total of 50,000 euros.

According to Aldor Nini who helped with this article, based on the above the women will have to pay 2615 euros (less VAT) to the record companies’ lawyer, 1368 euros to the court, and up to 2,615 (less VAT) to their own lawyer.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Mediaget
  • Download Torrents with BTguard

NewsBits

The latest news from around the web, not covered on the frontpage

  • RIAA: “Misinformation May Be a Dirty Trick, But It Works.”

    For years the RIAA has tried to convince the world that piracy is killing musicians. Supported...

  • Russia’s Largest BitTorrent Tracker Under Huge DDoS Attack

    RUTracker, Russia’s largest BitTorrent tracker, has been dealing with the effects of a DDoS attack over...

  • Reddit and WordPress Urge Congress to Shelve SOPA/PIPA

    A coalition of 70 groups, including Reddit and WordPress, are asking Congress to stop working on...

  • Turbobit.net Blocks US Visitors After MegaUpload Shutdown

    In the aftermath of the MegaUpload shutdown, file-hosting sites continue to change their services. After Uploaded.to,...

  • QuickSilverScreen Streaming Links Site Calls It Quits

    In the wake of the Megaupload raids and attacks on domains in the US and elsewhere,...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

RecommendedArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.