TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia (Updated)

In what is by far the greatest DMCA mess we’ve ever witnessed, several major movie studios have seemingly asked Google to take down legitimate copies of their own films. Through an agent the studios further requested the search engine to remove their official Facebook pages and Wikipedia entries, as well as movie reviews in prominent newspapers. Has the world gone mad or…?

Update: see updates below the article.

Ever since Google announced that it would publish the DMCA requests it receives as part of their transparency report, the number of notices being sent have shot through the roof.

While the majority of the requests are legitimate there are also occasional mistakes, often caused by automated filters. To some degree this is understandable, but the examples we present today are so off the chart that the people responsible should really reconsider their jobs.

Early November a few dozen DMCA notices were sent on behalf of several major movie studios. While this is nothing new by itself, the number of mistakes in these notices are stunning. We will discuss a few of them below.

Lionsgate

On behalf of Lionsgate a DMCA notice was sent to Google, asking the search engine to remove links to infringing copies of the movie “Cabin in the Woods”. The notice in question only lists two dozen URLs, but still manages to include perfectly legal copies of the film on Amazon, iTunes, Blockbuster and Xfinity.

20th Century Fox

20th Century Fox sent in a DMCA notice to protect the movie “Prometheus”. However, as collateral damage it also took down a link to a legal copy on Verizon on demand, the collection of the Prometheus Watch Company, and a Huffington Post article.

And what about a DMCA takedown request for the Wikipedia entry of “Family Guy” that is supposedly infringing?

Perhaps even more crazy is another request sent on behalf of 20th Century Fox for “How I Met Your Mother”. The DMCA notice lists a CBS URL as the official source of the copyrighted material, but the same URL later appears in the list of infringing links.

BBC Films

BBC Films, like the other studios, also target their own film, in this case “Ill Manors”. However, the DMCA notice in question also asks Google to take down several film reviews published by The Guardian, The Independent, The Mirror and the Daily Mail.

Even worse, the takedown request lists the film’s official Facebook page.

Summit Entertainment

Summit Entertainment sent a DMCA notice asking Google to remove infringing copies of the film “50/50″. However, the list of URLs contains a URL of the Blockbuster video rental site, as well as an announcement on Stanford’s website for the “50th Symposium Keynote Address by Secretary Chu”.

Other than that the notice mainly lists a variety of unrelated videos with 50 in the title, such as Attack of the 50ft Cheerleader and 50 First Dates.

Sony Pictures

A notice sent on behalf of Sony Pictures was supposed to make illicit copies of “The Other Guys” unavailable. But, for some reason it targets tech news reports on the Megaupload case on Cnet, Wired and Forbes, among others.

The same notice also lists several unrelated titles such as The Expendables, The Butterfly Effect, Frasier, Two and a Half Men, The River Wild and 28 Weeks Later.

Walt Disney Pictures

The last rogue DMCA notice we’ll discuss here is from Walt Disney Pictures who made a request for Google to disable access to infringing copies of the movie “Cinderella”. This notice mistakenly requests that Google censors the BBC’s kids corner where several perfectly legal fairy tales are listed.

For the rest the notice is filled with links to unrelated Cinderella films, or even content that’s not even related to Cinderella such as The Flintstones, Frida and Revolution.

The above is just a small selection of the most obvious mistakes, but there are many more to be found. Luckily Google appears to have left most of the reported links online, minimizing the damage.

Interestingly enough, they above examples were all sent by an outfit called “Yes It Is – No Piracy!” which we’ve never heard of before.

The company appears to present itself as a DMCA remover on the website yesitis.org but lists no address. Considering the many mistakes made by the firm, one has to wonder whether their “under penalty of perjury” statement that they represent the copyright holders above is accurate.

TorrentFreak attempted to contact several of the involved rightsholders, but we have yet to receive a response.

Whatever the case, the above once again shows the danger of automated DMCA notices that are sent out without any type of verification. Right now rightsholders and the anti-piracy outfits they employ have absolutely no incentive to improve the accuracy of their takedown systems.

Perhaps it’s time for them to be punished?

Update: Yesitis.org now points to a parked page. Yet another sign that these notices may be fraudulent, and not authorized by the copyright holders at all. If that’s indeed the case it remains unclear what the purpose of these notices is. It would show how easily these DMCA notices can be abused.

Update: According to the MPAA the notices discussed above are “bogus.” “‘Yes It Is – No Piracy!’ has no relationship with studios. It is totally fake,” they told us.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • CCIFan

    Here is an easy way to stop all this DMCA nonsense. How about Google just censor everything the MAFIAA has?

    • Guest

      MAFIAA is retarded.

      • http://twitter.com/Jessica40551368 Jessica Hutchins

        The DMCA notice lists a CBS URL as the official source of the copyrighted material, but the same URL later appears in the list of infringing links.http://www.youtube.qr.net/jOMV/watch?v=i3fU3cRI1Lo

      • Guest

        please flag above as spam

      • Solution

        Blocking all US IP-addresses works for me. Should work for the MAFIAA too. I don’t infringe their shit on their turf, they never have to hear from or of me.

        Hell, everyone should just peerblock the US. It’s win-Fucking-win all round.

        • Didyounotice

          Um, Your Talking On an usa site you douche.

        • Who

          @Didyounotice: just because Torrentfreak uses a .com domain don’t mean the server is located in the US ya douche.

        • BJonesTF

          Indeed it doesn’t mean that, however it is hosted in the US. (http://whois.domaintools.com/173.193.242.225)

        • Who

          @BJonesTF: but IP location still don’t mean that the site is located on a US server. the domain wasn’t even registered @ that corporation. its just merely using that IP. probably to throw off US authorities in case they piss some one off.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Not a win-win all around, especially for Americans who are legally timeshifting works they have already paid for in some manner.

        • asdf

          @Who:

          Torrentfreak.com IP address 173.193.242.225

          http://www.checksitetraffic.com/ip_address/173.193.242.225

          Server IP 173.193.242.225
          Country United States of America
          Region Texas
          City Dallas
          Internet Service Provider Softlayer Technologies Inc.
          Server Host Name 173.193.242.225-static.reverse.softlayer.com

      • Who

        yep I 2nd that

      • senior-citizen.1924

        Hollytards can eat from my bum.

    • Teodormatis

      hah yeah , they should censor every request they get. especially the legit ones. just to troll them xD

      • Alex Bones

        yeah right… you can’t make any happier if you do so…

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          Actually yes. Want to buy your daughter a disney movie? Better go ask your friendly neighbourhood pirate because he’s the only one who can find the link to Amazon…

          That would work even better if the “takedowns” were DNS blocks.

      • DayOne

        I will give my support to Disney even if somebody committed a mistake,
        it’s okay if they remove Cinderella from the mind of every person in the world.
        Next step should be they decided to disappear their other fairy tales.

        • Dopey

          that would be grimm indeed

        • Conservative

          Cinderella is public domain and does not even belong to Disney.

        • DayOne

          @Conservative
          If you didn’t notice, I was talking about their version and their other fairy tales.
          When parents want to show that story to their kids,
          they give them the Disney version.

          Cinderella works very well as a horror story, not as a fairy tale for kids.
          If you know something about the older versions, you have already seen
          they included things like: suicides, cannibalism, murders and similar aspects.

          The moral of Cinderella is mostly:
          “Blood in blood out, that’s the way to be happy”.

          The 3rd movie of Disney [SPOILER, anyway, you won't lose anything worthy]
          concludes with their stepmother and stepsister turned in servants of Cinderella
          and using dirty clothes. That ending has a lot of irony.

    • CCIFan

      Here is an easy way to stop all this DMCA nonsense. How about People just set up FAKE Lawyer websites that generate FAKE DMCA notices and just censor everything the MAFIAA has?

      OH WAIT! THAT IS EXACLY WHAT HAPPENED!
      (except TF spoiled the FUN by reporting it)

      • GuesterHonor

        MAFIAA: Music And Film Industry Association of America

    • Who

      here is another thought….STOP using google!

      • Sense

        Stop using the internet!

        • Who

          ya that’s the next step.

      • Moogle

        Yeah, it’s time to say goodbye to Google.
        In my case, I already use other search engines.
        I’m obviously getting different and sometimes best results.

    • JordanKratz

      Google needs to get some balls and grow a few !!!
      1.Charge these DMCA Shitheads a bunch of money for each lookup.
      2.Charge them for each time they send a request on DMCA
      3.Better yet remove all MAFIAA Stuff from google for a Week to punish them.
      4.Even better yet completely remove the MAFIAA and BAN Them forever.

    • font9a

      How about making the Studios solely responsible for hosting, promoting, and otherwise socializing their movies? What if it was completely the onus of the studios to provide the channels by which their content can be discussed or consumed? We’d see a lot fewer movies, there’d be a lot fewer fans, and the costs would be so high that no one would pay for it. The studios want their cake and to eat it to. They want the marketing and promotion the Internet allows, but they also want to control it — they’re not going to get it (the control part, that is.)

  • DID

    I think it is time to charge them for wrong DMCA requests

    • Guest321

      Why charge them if they want to censor themselves?

  • Lolsec

    I would remove them just for the lulz. They can’t complain they did ask for it.

  • Laughter is Healthy

    I think Google should honor their requests to remove their own site, just for giggles.

    • Nodelay

      Then invoice them for the trouble.

    • The_Doorman

      “Luckily Google appears to have left most of the reported links online, minimizing the damage. ”

      I am not sure why you describe this as lucky. Wouldn’t it be more pertinent for Google to do as they ask, and remove those listings from the Google index?

      Doesn’t the maxim “Be careful what you wish for, you just may get it” apply here?

      • Dude

        It would be less sales for them and they should remove the links lol.

  • Noone

    Or just censor all their legal links then. Their own fault, right?

    • Blabbo

      It’s really the only legitimate take-down request. Since they published the content, there are no one else’s rights to consider, and Google should instantly comply.

  • Guest

    Well Google should carry out these requests and if they are legitimate content of the movie studios that the movie studios have requested to be taken down then it should be taken down. If the movie studios sends DMCA’s that take down their own legitimate content down by mistaken then tough, they made the mistake and they should pay for it. Google are not mind readers and it is not job to censor DMCA’s that are sent to them. It is for the movie studios to ensure that these DMCA’s are sent correctly and tough luck and on their head be it if they are not.

    • JG

      “Google are not mind readers and it is not job to censor DMCA’s that are sent to them.”

      True. I agree that if the studio’s own legit site gets added to the request, that’s their own tough luck if it gets taken down… But I’m kind of leery to say Google should just blindly accept every link and automatically block it.

      If they know Google isn’t going to look at the list, but just auto-block any request that comes in, I could see people taking advantage of this. For example, what would stop one of the networks who own Hulu from adding the Netflix and iTunes links for their show(s) just so they can get more people to Hulu & make more money….

      And what about sites that obviously were accidental false positives? Like Summit Entertainment’s request to have the Stanford.edu site censored for hosting Secretary Chu’s keynote address that just so happened to have 50 in its title, like the movie they were attempting to censor. I’d like to believe that more likely than not, Stanford is probably NOT hosting pirated content on their site. Stanford may have enough clout to get their site removed from the black list, but will your random net’izen should his “50/50 – Smith Family trek to all 50 states in 50 days” site get scooped up by accident simply thanks to the similar title? You complain to Google your site is gone. Google asks Summit to recheck, they run the site through the same filter “Yeah, we double checked, its defiantly infringing on our intellectual property, keep it off” & Google just says “Sorry mate”…

      • Guest

        Google recieves thousands of these things a day and recieves no finiancial compensation for processing them – which they are required to do within a pretty short time frame.

        I don’t blame them for doing “Garbage In – Garbage Out” it lets them focus on more productive things AND shows how broken the system is.

        Win win.

        • Bloaxor

          And to add insult to injury, I recall their DMCA-processing sector being pretty huge.

    • Whatever

      If Google were smart they would already have done it.

      Wouldn’t the counter DMCA they have to send to “unblock” their own material immediatelly PROVE that they are sending bogus DMCA’s and punished.

      In that case they have 2 options:
      1. Don’t send a counter DMCA to avoid litigation and stay “blocked”.
      2. Send a counter DMCA and get prosecuted for it.

      In any case it will return the burden of sending a DMCA back to the MAFIAA to find out in all millions of DMCA’s to find the ones that went wrong.

      BTW: It is completely obvious that those filters just check the way google shows search results (couldn’t be less accurate). It would be easy to setup a honeypot site with the tag words of all the movies to get receive an illegal DMCA.

      While typing i realized that this that this would be the way to set them up for fraudulent DMCA’s.

      (any program can be tricked).

  • http://twitter.com/scotteshbaugh Scott Eshbaugh

    Wow, seems like the film industry is shooting themselves in the foot on this one.

  • Anonymous

    ‘Perhaps it’s time for them to be punished?’

    statutory damages of $150,000 per infringement x however many infringements can be trumped up + a minimum prison term of 3 years sounds about right to me

    • Masau Fuku

      You forgot to include per person who may have not paid for the legal product/service provided (or donated to the legally operating organization) because it was unrightfully censored.

  • KrackOrJacK

    I watch all videos online! bwahahahaha And there isn’t fukin thing they can do about it!

    • Myemail

      KrackorJAck,

      We told your mom on you. She’s going to ground you.

      -The rest of the internet

  • Pingback: Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia | Best Seedbox

  • anon

    WOOOW, this is just fucking retarded !

  • FD

    in place of google i would just sensor them , their site are worthless anyway and mainly paid

    • Guest

      Except that some have Google ads. They wouldn’t censor those, right?

      • Vincent Giannell

        They would if they don’t like them.

  • http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/ SJD

    The above is just a small selection of the most obvious mistakes, but there are many more to be found. Luckily Google appears to have left most of the reported links online, minimizing the damage.

    Unfortunately, the damage is not minimized, it is a permanent status quo of perpetual damage. To minimize the damage, Google should consider following the requests literally.

    I always say the the only effective method of proving that copyright cartel is insane is reductio ad absurdum.

  • Pyvbzchn

    Dear Google: charge 50$ per dmca notice the mafiaa sends.

    Give the obscene amount of money collected to all kinds of charity.

    Problem solved.

    • Blabbo

      Should use the money to buy and demolish their office buildings and re-task all their employees with picking up litter.

    • Masau Fuku

      They can’t legally, and such a charge would make it impossible for individuals and small groups to prevent large organizations from *actually* stealing their content and selling it as their own.

      Actually penalizing false claims is the better route to take.

      • Anyone

        sure they can, it’s called “sueing”
        but of course, that would cost the MAFIAA way too much, they rather have Google pay the costs

        • Ryan Bach

          Suing costs money. Individuals and small groups sure as hell don’t have the money to sue a large media company, no matter how blatant the abuse is. MAFIAA would be the *only* ones who could make any attempt to enforce their IP ‘rights’ in court. That’s *why* we have the DMCA safe harbor clause – to make it as painless as possible for people with legitimate copyright claims to have infringing materials taken down. Google *should* pay the costs to make sure they are not profiting off illegal content, but they shouldn’t pay whatever arbitrary costs are imposed upon them by spurious claims. That’s why penalizing repeat offenders for false claims is the only real solution.

        • Anyone

          or we could simply get rid of copyright alltogether, so everyone is better off

    • root@google.com

      don’t be a daft, they cannot even manage to pay corporation tax here in england. google are tax avoiding cunts.

  • h33t

    face palm

  • Violated0

    All a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing.

    Right hand puts legitimate supply online but left hand takes it down.
    Right hand wants to stop piracy but left hand stops official promotion.
    Right hand wants top search engine placement but left hand deletes them from the search engine.

    Now they should say “Thank you Google for saving us as we mistakenly try to turn people towards piracy”

    As I said before the only way they will clean up their act is for automatic fines for false DMCA take-down requests. Hitting them in the money is like putting their balls in the vice and turning the handle.

    Naturally though Congress is only paid to fix fantasy problems when there is no bribe money in fixing real problems like this one.

    • dcoetzee

      Take a look at the DMCA request that actually lists their official content URL, then lists it among the URLs to remove. I think this is more a case of neither hand knowing what it is itself doing, because it’s been entirely automated by shitty programmers. Without any incentive to minimize illegitimate requests, they’re delegating the task of validating their sanity to others.

  • JohnM

    Has Google never heard the phrase “Hoist with your own petard”?

  • Guest

    Who cares?
    Let them DMCA their own links. People will either use a proper search engine or never get there.

    Either way, they suffer, not us.

    • me

      “Either way, they suffer, not us.”

      well, Google suffers because they have to manually check the request and react in some way. All this doesn’t come for free. In the current context, those automated DMCA-takedown robots are actually STEALING money from Google, and Google really ought to lobby Congress for a reform of that silly DMCA law.

      • Dude

        They should be setting a price for each dmca notice received.

      • IHaveNoBalls

        That’s funny, with all Google’s money and influence, why don’t they lobby the government like the copyright monopoly does… anyways, this is just another reason not to use Google anymore. I switched a month back, haven’t missed them one bit.

        • Kabob3892

          Um, because they’re a fucking search engine. Their job is to direct you where to go. That’s all. If they tried to have a political agenda, can you imagine all the asshats like you that would stop using their services? Not to mention the legal complications. I think that google might know what they’re doing.

  • Anon

    Like I said countless times: Google should only accept DMCA notices sent by fax or mail. Then they would allow some time to process those requests.

    Quite simple, if people use the internet to send fake notices, they don’t even need to charge them. Just make the whole process more serious.

    They don’t need to charge to process DMCA notices. They only need to make them pay to send them. I have sent a fake DMCA notice once posing myself as a company like the MAFIAA.

    Guess what? Nothing happened with me and the contents were taken offline (from a blog) without even Google questioning me if I was legit or not.

  • http://woodquinn.x10.mx/ Quinn

    Maybe Google should implement a six-strikes policy:
    1.) Ceasing of DMCA Takedown Processing Until Receipt of Signed Apology
    2.) Loss of Automated Privileges for one Month
    3.) Ceasing of DMCA Takedown Processing Until Completion of Training on Reasons for Copyright and Fair Use
    4.) Loss of Automated Privileges for Three Months and Dismissal of Requests to Take Down Links from/to Small Sites
    5.) Permanent Dismissal of Requests to Take Down Links from/to Small Sites
    6.) Permanent Loss of Automated Privileges

    Google’d likely still be fully complying with the law.

    • http://woodquinn.x10.mx/ Quinn

      7.) A New Doodle to Humiliate Said Company, Linked to ChillingEffects’ Page on Them.

    • Erin

      I like people that offer solutions, not just complain about the problem. Good on you, Quinn.

      • Guest

        He should send an email to Google or EFF.

  • Pingback: DD Tech Solutions - Whoops: Movie studios ask Google to censor links to legal copies of their films and related content

  • http://twitter.com/Anime4PSP Anime 4 PSP

    Ohohoh, how familiar. Just like DtecNet was sending DMCA notices to google on behalf of Microsoft and Lionsgate for removal of Arbitrage and something else and pointing to discussion of filesharing site on my forum.
    Srsly, they should be punished for this automated shit

  • ScrewEwe2

    Say what?

  • ScrewEwe2

    ROTFLMFAO.

  • Andrew Lee

    ROFL! Face palm is an understatement. Like I said on a previous article it’s the dream job for all junkies and they just keep proving my point.

    I almost feel bad for trolling them now that I’m 100% sure that they’re severely mentally handicap. Alright I lied I don’t feel bad at all lol and I think Google should drop the bomb on these assholes and start removing their sites.

    How stupid do I think they are?
    Farting in the bathtub and laughing their ass off stupid.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Most junkies would probably have higher standards. The people who dream this crap up? They actually believe.

      And that turns them into something like religious fanatics.

  • DarkTigris

    How to destroy your work in one step: Take them down from Google.

  • JimTonJo

    OKO wow this makes a whole lot of sense dude. Wow.

    http://www.Masking-IP.tk

  • Violated0

    I doubt many of us have.

    My best guess on the meaning would be… If you want to blow stuff up then use your own explosives.

    • MadAsASnake

      Pretty straightforward – it means that you have just been taken out by the very argument you yourself were championing. Own Goal to loose the match is another way of looking at it.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Same meaning as “give the man enough rope to hang himself”.

      Basically means you’re using the instrument the man brought to hang you up, to hang him up instead.

  • Violated0

    Look on when this is the world these days. The Internet gets seriously damaged in false censorship where politicians stare on with a blank look on their faces, twiddling their thumbs, only awaiting their next bribe funds to serve private commercial interests.

    The only people who can protect the Internet are the people who use it.

  • Pingback: The Perils of DMCA Take Down Notice Automation (Again) | DMCA Force

  • MadAsASnake

    Ban automated take down tools because they are way too random. Simple. The shame of this is that although some of these are just funny, many more take down other peoples legitimate stuff – and this can be very damaging if Google is part of the promotion plan.

    • icec0ld

      What? And force DMCAing companies to be liable for their idiocy? Currently they can hide behind a “oh but we didn’t know because our moronic system can’t distinguish between legit content.” thanks to some scum baggy rules in the DMCA put there by their lackeys

  • Testiodej

    re: “Yes It Is – No Piracy!” which we’ve never heard of before.”

    Our services include:

    * Adoption
    * Asset Protection
    * Auto Accident
    * Bankruptcy
    * Civil Litigation
    * Class Action Suits and Defense
    * Consumer Advocacy and Protection
    * Contracts
    * Copyright Law
    * Criminal Defense
    * Divorce
    etc, etc, etc. ….

    Apparently this group of lawyers is utterly incompetent when it comes to anything internet-related, even the kind of things any young kid could easily do. Pathetic dimshits.

    • There You Go

      It was a FAKE website. They used it as a FRONT to submit FAKE DMCA notices. It worked like a charm too! Whomever set this up deserves 10 ‘attaboys’.

      :)

  • CaptCosmo

    GOOGLE?? Who needs them to find torrents to download? Join a couple of public sites, build a good reputation, get invited to join some private sites and enjoy your downloaded materials. GOOGLE just brings you to sites that are trashed by the general public and cause your computer infectious problems. Protect yourself, if you use GOOGLE to find torrents you deserve what you get!

  • Ha Ha

    HaHa … yesitis is now noitaint.
    Website crashed! Awesome!

    • Deleted

      I posted hours ago how it was a bogus scam website.
      But TorrentFreak (or DisQus) deleted the post.

      Well, at least the yesitis(dot)org site is now deleted as well.
      Life is GOOD.

  • mall security

    pshh

  • mall security

    this is bullshit

  • dusoft

    the website yesitis.org does not work anymore…

    • $69.99

      You can buy it from GoDaddy for $69.99.
      Just in time for Christmas.

  • Qweasd

    So would this be a good way to troll the studios. Create a web site that generates takedown requests where you can select the network and content.

    Basically flood the system so it becomes useless. The point would be to issue takedowns on stuff that is valuable to the network in the hope that it actually does get taken down thereby allowing the network to feel what it’s like to have their content removed for no good reason.

    • Nailed

      YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD
      (It was a FAKE website generating FAKE DMCA notices).

      I want one for Christmas!

  • Anon

    The more rightsholders struggle to break the law and succeed, the more they will be put down like poisoned dogs that will not die even though they are poisoned. I will laugh as the harsh punishment comes.

    • Anyone

      well played

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Would that be “withering and lifecrushing punishment even the families will feel” as that other “Anon” guy once had it?

  • EricPost

    The only way to change the DMCA is to take it out of the big money hands. That will never happen The DMCA is here to stay. All anyone has to do is scream child porn and everyone fold instantly.

    The reality is you need money to get elected to Congress. For instance, it takes about 10 million dollars for the winning Senator in the USA. This means you have to have the backing of big businesses. You won’t raise that much money from the little guy.

    Big businesses don’t care if the DMCA is wrong because they don’t have any liability if they don’t take down their own site. It may look dumb and is dumb, but it doesn’t cost, so it will be around.

    If anything file sharing is getting harder not easier for the average Joe.

  • Fakefakefakefake

    Conspiracy guys. Suppose that they’re intentionally removing legal links to artificially inflate the amount of DMCA requests they send consequently improving lobbying efforts etc.

  • Ye Haw

    Update: Yesitis.org now points to a parked page. Yet another sign that these notices may be fraudulent, and not authorized by the copyright holders at all.

    TorrentFreak and MAFIAA working together?
    Well I’ll be dipped in dogshit!

  • test test

    Seems the internet has a case of brain cancer. Proliferating bullshit with no discretion. The internet routes itself around censorship? Seems it’s generating its own censorship.

    • WarmFuzzy

      Not at all. This was a BRILLIANT prank!
      A sign of a healthy Internet. Staged DMCA insanity.

      Google, TorrentFreak and MAFIAA fell for it hook, line and sinker.
      Once you think about it you begin to appreciate just how AWESOME it was.

      A warmfuzzy for chillingeffects.

      • Bye Bye

        The Google cache of yesitis is slowly evaporating …
        Shame. Some of the text is hilarious …

        “Whether you’re on the side of the prosecution or the side of the defense, you can rest assured that we’re on your side.”

        Content copyright 2012. Yes It Is No Piracy – DMCA Remover.
        All rights reserved.

        Bye Bye — We Will Miss You!

    • joexxx

      Not really. The moment Google starts censoring too much for people, people will stop using it and Google will die.

  • the dark knight rises x246.mp4

    i think we are behoven to use films, songs and the like for usernames. i think it’d be fun to post to government web sites, film studio forums and just about anywhere with nyms like ‘the dark knight rises x246.mp4′.

  • the dark knight rises x246.mp4

    time to start using film, song, and the like names on all kinds of government and film studio forums, things like ‘the dark knight rises x246.mp4′, should cause some chaos for ‘em.

    • Blah

      Batman.The.Dark.Knight.2008.720p.BR.999MB.ShAaNiG.com-1.m4v

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      You know, the only movie left in the world untouched by that spoof campaign will be “Twilight”.

      Do you know anyone willing to use that as a nick?

      • SomeYahoo

        me

        i’d sooner spoof twilight than any of those awful transformers movies

      • twilite breaking dawn p2.avi

        i’d do it because there is a goal to be achieved and no matter how shite the film used, the goal is more important.

  • JimTonJo

    That looks like it might jsut actually work. Wow.

    http://www.IPMask.tk

  • joexxx

    Of course it’s easy to abuse. There is no recourse.
    The DMCA needs to be revised such that is it totally symmetric regarding punishment with respect to the rights holders and their users.

  • Vincent Giannell

    “Yesitis.org now points to a parked page. Yet another sign that these notices may be fraudulent, and not authorized by the copyright holders at all. If that’s indeed the case it remains unclear what the purpose of these notices is. It would show how easily these DMCA notices can be abused.”

    The Movie Studios won’t be happy reading this. They’ll claim it’s all a lie set up by Pirates trying to frame them.

    • Mommy

      Pirates steal shit. Hackers fuck things up.

      “They’ll claim it’s all a lie set up by HACKERS trying to frame them.”

      You must be ‘trollogically’ correct!

      • Vincent Giannell

        I’m afraid they’ll think pirates are worse than hackers.

        • Daddy

          “Gee Dad, Can’t I be a Pirate-Hacker?”
          “Well Son, I’ve found that they don’t usually mix well.”
          “But Dad, I want to steal shit AND fuck things up.”
          “Well, OK Son, just remember to wear you proxies over your VPNs.”
          “OK Dad”

          “I Love you Dad”
          “I Love you too Son”

          kiss kiss hug hug

    • Anyone

      but it is scary that such bullshit is so believable and expected from the MAFIAA that noone even thought twice about those bogus takedowns
      simply business as usual

  • Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, December 3, 2012

  • Pingback: Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia | Zombie Torrents - Ultimate Torrents Downloads

  • Legaleagle

    I thought there were huge penalties for inaccurate or incorrect DMCA takedowns. The rights holders that legitimately control this content should seek financial compensation. That should ensure due diligence by the proIP trolls.

    • Anyone

      there are in theory
      but the MAFIAA just blames “the computer” and gets off scot free

  • GP

    [Mocking Statement]: “The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention.” / Now that *is* irony!, Bender

  • IfIWereYou

    Who the FUCK do they think they are?

  • mrawr

    Nice.. now i know the links to get perfectly illegal copies of their movies

  • http://twitter.com/JerkfaceMcGee Jerkface McGee

    Robo notices, gotta love em.

  • Monalisa

    mad to the bone

  • Wally

    You know you live in a sad state of things when you have a system that generally doesn’t cover automated requests. It’s not the DCMA (trust me, it’s fairly reasonable after SOPA and ACTA) it’s those that abuse it that are the problem.

  • Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, December 3, 2012 : eMarketing Wall

  • Pingback: Interesting Links I | On Tea & Droids

  • Pingback: Quand les studios de cinéma demandent à Google de censurer leurs propres liens | {niKo[piK]}

  • Pingback: SearchCap: The Day In Search, December 3, 2012 | tecBird

  • KG

    Take down all the legal stuff they ask, just do it already. Let them deal with the egg on their face back-pedal. The explanation they provide will be more amusing than the mistake.

  • http://www.facebook.com/romet.loodus Romet Loodus

    Haha, they are really dedicated to entertaining people.

  • Pingback: Despite Errors, Copyright Protection Companies Relies on Automated Systems

  • Pingback: Estudios piden a Google que censure los sitios legales de s... - FayerWayer

  • Pingback: WTF? Algunos estudios piden a Google que censure los sitios legales de sus películas | SoftMexico - (SinapsysMx)

  • Pingback: Fraudulent DMCA Requests Spike After The Google "Pirate Update" Algorithm

  • Pingback: Proof: Movie Studios Fear The Internet More Than They Like Publicity | Nerd Array

  • Pingback: RLM News Show Blog - 2012-12-04 | Real Liberty Media

  • Pingback: Studies asked Google to censor legitimate sites of his films | Tech News Pedia

  • Pingback: The Daily Dies – Were they Set to Fail? | Podcast on Geekazine

  • Pingback: Links 5/12/2012: NetBSD 5.2, Linux 3.7 RC8, New KDE Beta | Techrights

  • http://ax11.myopenid.com/ cosmodrome

    Sounds a lot like the Yes Men to me…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CH76QIKXYIFA2FZ2DXC6NUZ24A Andrei

    So why shouldn’t Google listen to these demands? If the MAFIAA is retarded enough to demand the censorship of legitimate content maybe Google should obey in a transparent way and then let legitimate content providers join the mounting outrage against the MAFIAA.

    • guess who

      google should respect them and take the pages down. it isn’t their job to check to see if they are legitimate or not.

  • Pingback: DMCA, tutti gli sbagli del copyright | infropy - information entropy

  • Pingback: Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia - TorrentFreak | p2p

  • Xoom

    LMFAO they should censor more of there crap esp the constant recycled scripts Hollywood churn out

  • Steven Gustafson

    Simple, assess a penalty of $1M per incorrect request (incorrect URL) with no exemptions and is always due, no matter what, such as student loans always being repayable. Or maybe all search engines should spend 1 month blindly obeying the requests and watch the Internet get so useless that there will be a public uproar to fix the insanity these companies are getting away with.

  • Erik Henderson

    I think i just found a new hobby. The current system is easily abused by by the recording industry, it is so easy to abuse even a private citizen could do it. Takes three min to file a DCMA take down.

  • Pingback: DMCA Epic Fail? Movie Studios Want Google To Censor Legal Links?!?

  • Pingback: Dumb DMCA: Movie producers ask Google to take down links to their own websites, legitimate sources to purchase content, and film reviews | Reviews, news, tips, and tricks -- dotTech

  • Pingback: Movie studios’ automated takedown requests target legitimate links | AIVAnet

  • U-95

    And there’s still people so naive that thinks DMCA and other related crap will not affect freedom of speech.

  • Pingback: Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia (Updated) | Best Seedbox

  • Pingback: Wojny antypirackich robotów w sieci uderzaj? w ludzi. | Co nas uwiera

  • Pingback: Bogus DMCA Takedown Requests Take Over The Internet : P2P ON!

  • Pingback: Pure Decking 0098 Show Notes |

  • Pingback: WTF? Algunos estudios piden a Google que censure los sitios legales de sus películas | Noticias de Internet

  • Pingback: Google: Les studios de cinéma demande la censure de leurs propre liens - Geek-Party

  • Pingback: DMCA Notices Gone Wrong » ScottSevener.com

  • Pingback: Lord Justice Leveson makes journalistic faux pas, cuts and pastes from Wikipedia « A SEARCH ENGINE FOR POSTS

  • Pingback: Are Companies Abusing Google’s “Pirate Update”? | Tulsa Marketing Online Blog

  • Pingback: When Google’s Algorithm Changes Result in Controversy

  • Pingback: Hollywood censored themselves | Devilbit

  • Pingback: Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia (Updated) | The Illuminati

  • Pingback: Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia (Updated) | Wikisis

  • Pingback: Movie Studios Ask Google To Censor Their Own Films, Facebook and Wikipedia (Updated) – December 03, 2012 at 01:59PM | Lifestream

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.