TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Music Piracy Controversy Surrounds Charity Fund Raising

In Italy artists and musicians have made a charity song to raise money for victims of the recent earthquake and over in Spain, artists have performed to raise funds for a seriously ill boy. Both events, thanks to the involvement of music industry lobby groups, have been touched by copyright controversy.

In April hundreds of people were killed and tens of thousands left homeless after an earthquake hit L’Aquila in Italy. The ongoing effort to help those affected is huge and includes various fund-raising events. One of those is a collaboration of 56 artists and musicians who came together to record a song entitled “Domani 21/4.09″ (Tomorrow 21/4.09). Recorded over three days, the proceeds of the 6 minute song will go to helping the victims of the quake.

There can be little doubt, considering the already-massive effort underway to help those affected, that the song will sell as quickly as it can be put into stores and that the result will be that much-needed funds will reach those that need it most. However, elements of the Italian music industry simply couldn’t resist getting in a strike against P2P, when the opportunity arose to do so.

Domani 21/4.09, like any (every) other song, already made its way on to P2P networks and Italy’s answer to the RIAA has wasted no time in taking advantage. FIMI, the Federazione Industria Musicale Italiana, represents around 2,500 companies producing and distributing music in Italy and has been quick to condemn the leak, claiming that file-sharers are downloading the song while essentially trying to avoid giving money to charity, something which I find a little hard to believe.

People who want to give to charity and help a good cause, do so. Those that don’t want to give have made their choice too but of course there is clearly some propaganda value in claiming otherwise. We’ve all heard the untruth “one download equals one lost sale” but this is probably the first time i’ve heard “one download equals one less donation to charity”.

“There are thousands of copies of the song and video made available on P2P networks with tens of thousands of illegal downloads every day,” said the secretary general of Federation Against Music Piracy, Luca Vespignani. In an attempt at escalation, Vespignani says he has reported the situation to Italy’s Guardia di Finanza. “In this case, the damage goes beyond just music piracy, it is damaging a charity,” he said.

Meanwhile, moving west to Spain, aggressive copyright group Spanish General Society of Authors and Editors has been up to its old tricks again and it clearly doesn’t mind ‘damaging a charity’. In December last year we reported how SGAE illegally gatecrashed a wedding in order to gather evidence that the event was avoiding copyright fees due to them. For their trouble, SGAE was fined around $82,000 but now the group has sunk to a new low.

Juanma López Fenoy is a very sick young man who suffers from a degenerative brain disease called Alexander Syndrome. In order to raise money so that Juanma can go to the US to receive treatment, a charity concert was organized, with artists waiving their fees to perform. The concert took place April 25 and raised €56,000 ($75,000) through ticket sales.

Of course, SGAE wanted their piece of the pie – a 10% piece to be exact – in order to cover their copyright fees. After complaints were made against SGAE, the group issued a statement saying that its actions were entirely consistent with copyright laws, which don’t allow anyone to get away with not paying the fees. However, when SGAE’s stance became known publicly, the opposition to their lack of compassion grew too loud for them to ignore.

SGAE issued a statement, saying that although it would still take its 10%, it would make an equivalent voluntary donation back to the fund, effectively canceling it out.

Better late than never, but if SGAE wanted to make a charitable donation it would’ve been in better taste to have done it willingly, rather than under pressure. Here at TorrentFreak we have faith that people are still donating to the earthquake fund willingly too, P2P downloads or not, and they don’t need to be demonized or put under pressure by some copyright group to do so.

Details about making donations can be found here.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • El Cabron

    SGAE can suck my downloading dick, they ain’t getting a f*cking centimo from me

  • ZarathustrA

    So they’re now exploiting this disaster for propaganda? That’s classy.

  • Greg

    Stealing From a charity? They Demanded 10%!! I think that 10% would result in a much larger amount then the “illegal” file sharers “failed” to contribute.

    This seems like some sort of sick joke, too bad its real.

  • Pingback: Music Piracy Controversy Surrounds Charity Fund Raising 2009: April Hundreds

  • hiphop

    just how they claim their profit loss.

  • Zush

    Behold, o mortals, anti-”piracy” groups’ moral stature!

  • Hom3r

    also think of this: what if your unable to donate, but still want to hear the song?

  • yt b1

    SGAE were the real thieves here, not the p2p-ers

  • DAC

    How are you unable to donate?…. most stuff is online now-a-days…

  • salawhite

    Recently I found a hot club
    – SeekingTall.com –
    Just for hot tall gals and guys to find their cupid. Come on, tall singles. Don’t miss your lover.

  • riaatard

    I’ve never even heard of this charity or the song until now. So now having been labelled a “pirate” by “their” definition, I’ve never even heard of it or downloaded it so now I can only assume that I’m being blamed for something that I’ve never even heard of or done?

    It’s very thoughtful that the wealthy musicians have donated their time to have a benefit concert, but it’s not nice that the music industry officials are exploiting this opportunity to further the propaganda for their own selfish needs.

    Using the medical condition of an innocent person just to get publicity for their own cause is utterly selfish and immoral. If they truly cared about this person they would have donated 100% of all proceeds to the intended recipient right from the very beginning.

    They have a history of exploiting so many people including the artists that they claim to defend as well as exploiting and extorting money from grannies and low income children, but to go further to exploit someone who needs medical help; they’ve just hit the lowest level imaginable.

    To millionaire music artists, multimillionaire music executives and multibillion dollar music corporations, money is really no object. If they really cared, they would donate money themselves and finally give a little bit back to the world after they’ve “earned” their million dollar mansions, penthouses, yachts, limousines and private jets.

    They don’t. They’re selfish and only think about themselves.

    Truly appalling.

  • iShare

    I’d rather download it and donate to them through a website, this way I can be sure that 100% of my money was going to the cause, and it means they don’t have to worry about getting CDs out in stores.

  • Anonymous

    you dont take from charities you just dont do that :/… you copyright trolls are a bunch of selfish crooks

  • Anonymous

    Just hypothetically, Mr. Luca Vespignani, I could donate to this charity every time I download any of your other music. Are you still going to sue me?

  • xploit

    all charities are useless, because there always a bunch of greedy bastards behind it taking a cut …if you really want to help you go there and help, if you donate to a charity you’re probably just the kind of person who needs to brag about infront of others later on

  • Auntie Em

    Too bad the charities didn’t think of making a pre-emptive move, such as seeding their own torrents with a link to a donation website included. They really missed the boat on this one.

  • Pingback: Music Piracy Controversy Surrounds Charity Fund Raising | TorrentFreak | urbanhedonism

  • JTK

    Bastards.

  • Pingback: music » Blog Archive » Music Piracy Controversy Surrounds Charity Fund Raising | TorrentFreak

  • Bit

    I already made a donation. Nice song, I think I might actully pay for it. It sounded good, thanks torrents

  • Anonymous

    You guys are forgetting that SGAE might be exploiting this event but so are everyone of those people that download this song/s. I agree with piracy 100% but not in a case like this and saying that you find it hard to believe that epople will pirate this stuff is very very lame if it can be gotten for free then people are going to do it plain and simple so dont bitch about these guys wanting their piece of the pie as you put it when most of the readers of this site are gunna get it for free anyway…

  • Jimmy

    I highly doubt “tens of thousands” of people download this song via P2P every day. However, those who do, I hope will at least make a donation or buy the song later.

    George, sorry that Sony/BMG screwed you. I know that company, and its former leader Clive Davis is pure evil. (Now time to go to coda.fm and look for Sony music to download ;) )

  • Anonymous

    Everytime you download an .mp3, god adds 0.001 to the richter scale of the next earthquake!

  • mu57i11

    I sadly agree with 20.

  • Anonymous

    LOL @ pirates pirating a charity song.

    i wonder if ALL the people who downloaded instead of supporting the charity will now follow SGAE’s lead and actually contribute what they owe?

    probably not.

    all the anti-corporate nonsense just fell flat on its face. just like it does every time someone pirates something from a tiny independent record label or musician.

    the italian pirates have proven themselves to be just as greedy and selfish as the people they supposedly despise.

  • The_Punkinator

    @ 22 Shutup

    Ive never even heard of this earthquake shows how much they tell us over here in Australia.

  • Anonymous

    @Anonymous
    “i wonder if ALL the people who downloaded instead of supporting the charity will now follow SGAE’s lead and actually contribute what they owe?”

    You’re confused.

    SGAE insisted they were entitled to steal 10% of the charity proceeds because they’re greedy f?cking pieces of sh?t, then buckled under the public backlash and donated it all back.

    Downloading the song doesn’t take money out of anybody’s pocket, however. So if everybody who downloaded it paid back what they took from the charity, then they’d be paying back a whopping $0.

    You want people to donate nothing? Because that’s what you’re saying.

  • Anonymous

    please, they pirated a song that was designed to fund a charity. that’s despicable no matter how much backwards logic and semantics you throw at it.

    they would rather just take for themselves than actually help bring some relief to a valid cause.

    very telling, IMO.

  • c0rr0sive

    This is rather funny, because if you don’t want your money to go to a charity you can say, umm hey i want the song, I will buy the song, but I ain’t going to pay the charity portion, and they can’t do a thing about it. Sorry but they won’t make much money from this anyways.

  • some guy

    steal the song and give the the redcross:
    https://thepiratebay.org/tor/4891212/

    http://donate.ifrc.org/

  • Pingback: Music Piracy Controversy Surrounds Charity Fund Raising | News Inventory

  • Thhomas

    spain isn’t a country. that’s why their people aren’t people nor have any human kindness at all…

  • Stuart Hannig

    well i don’t mind saying i can defraud charitable organizations.

    i take pennies from the money drives. it’s no big deal everyone i work with at modine inc does things like this.

  • Anonymous

    Well it is a endemic problem throughout the corporate world.

    - Demonize your competitors.
    - Try to take money in every way possible and imaginable and if you can get away with it, do it.

    Antitrust laws exist but I doubt that the industry follows them like with the power to pick and choose to whom you can sell distribution rights and manipulate the prices.

    But the ramifications of this type of behavior have profound implications for communities worldwide.

  • Think about it

    @ 25 May 10, 2009 at 23:41 by Anonymous

    No, FIMI put the song up on bittorrent and then pirated it themselves to make P2P look bad. Apparently Italy is taking a page from the U.S. playbook and doing away with innocent until proven guilty.

  • Anonymous

    What a bunch of f*cking scumbags. I’d bet they’d charge their mothers for humming a damned tune…

  • jkljlkjoi

    wow they’re really double dipping on natural disasters and countless deaths.

    Not only have they got their hand in the “charity” cookie jar, and you kkkkknnnnoooooow they do, but, also using it as a tool against p2p. So in essence now they’re trying to make us pay through our own donations to support their morally bankrupt thinking and actions against us, good, giving, sharing people.

  • Black Pirate

    To millionaire music artists, multimillionaire music executives and multibillion dollar music corporations, money is really no object. If they really cared, they would donate money themselves and finally give a little bit back to the world after they’ve “earned” their million dollar mansions, penthouses, yachts, limousines and private jets.

    They don’t. They’re selfish and only think about themselves.

    Truly appalling.

    true folks in this world like that dont give a dam*e about the poor people some do care but thats rar

  • Anonymous

    Everybody knows these songs for charities are shitty anyway, you don’t buy them to listen to them.

  • Pingback: Today’s headlines, May 11 | fyimusic.ca

  • John

    People claiming that downloading the charity song is similar to taking 10% of the proceeds from a fund-raiser is the same are clearly not thinking this through.

    Sure, if i downloaded the song i would not be giving the earthquake cause any of my money – but i sure as shit am not taking any money away!

    The SGAE didn’t write any music. They didn’t organize any events.

    All they did is tell the artists/producers that they would try to limit the amount of copyright fraud – any now they want money for doing it?

    Reminds me of when the Russian Mafia used to ask the company i work for for ‘protection money’. Protection from them of course.

    I might download the song and have a listen – and i don’t think i will be donating any money to the cause

    (everyone in L’Aquila knows they are on prime earthquake territory, and those who didn’t pay for home insurance now want money?

    Everyone in Italy puts there home insurance money into a pot. Those who have there old stone homes knocked down get a new one built courtesy of everyone who also has home insurance. It isn’t charity is society.

    Furthermore, Italy is a wealthy country!! The government have more than enough cash to fix this mess – and they will!

    Humanitarian aid like people on the ground helping to clear rubble is one thing – these guys really make a difference.

    But cash? Pssh, please. That isn’t what’s needed at all.)

    Have i stolen anything? Have i even been than much of a bastard to listen to a song which is all over the radio and TV in Italy? Do i intend to use the song to make money or gain status?

    No, no, and no.

    The ‘pirates’ are the only good people left.

  • you

    I’m living in poverty, I normally don’t contribute to charity, though recently I gave my spare change to help retarded people.

    I’m going to download this song and I have nothing to give right now

  • Pingback: Computing and Internet: Music Piracy Controversy Surrounds Charity Fund Raising

  • Anonymous

    @you
    “though recently I gave my spare change to help retarded people.”

    What? You gave your spare change to help SGAE!? Shame on you! :D

  • Pingback: 3 Count: Charity Begins at Home | PlagiarismToday

  • Pingback: makin's posterous - Home

  • Pingback: makin257 - Music Piracy Controversy Surrounds Charity Fund Raising

  • Pingback: makin257's status on Monday, 11-May-09 23:20:25 UTC - Identi.ca

  • Pingback: POP Station Watch 4: Fake PSP v2 | Blogflock Blog

  • circ

    so if someone from Greenland were to download this song, that would stop them from donating to an Italian charity? OH SHIT. I had no idea the world was so intricate.

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.