TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

New MegaUpload Will Deflect Copyright Liability and Become Raid-Proof

While Megaupload’s demise has been well publicized, the burning question remains. How will its imminent replacement fend off attacks from aggressive copyright holders and authorities? Today we have the answer. Kim Dotcom and business partner Mathias Ortmann say they have a plan that will not only make “Mega” raid proof, but will also give it an iron-clad defense against copyright infringement claims.

This week the hottest story in file-sharing was the announcement that The Pirate Bay had boosted its security by migrating its operation into the cloud.

Performance and cost issues aside, the main aim of the site is to have as much uptime as possible, and that necessarily involves not getting raided. The site’s operators believe they have that covered.

Just a day later and another famous file-sharing operation is preparing for its relaunch with similar issues in mind, albeit from a different angle.

The return of Megaupload – or rather “Mega” as it will be called – will have an eye firmly placed on security to ensure not only a completely legal operation, but one that is almost immune to shutdown.

Speaking with Wired, Kim Dotcom and business partner Mathias Ortmann have been outlining how encryption will strengthen Mega’s “safe harbors”.

Before users upload their files to Mega they will be encrypted using the AES algorithm. Users will then be provided with a unique decryption key giving them sole responsibility for who can have future use of the file.

Not only does this ensure completely security and privacy for users’ files, Mega will have no knowledge of any encrypted file’s contents at any stage, effectively deflecting any future accusation that they were aware of how their service was being used.

But of course, none of this can protect Mega from the kind of act-first worry-later strategy employed by the US government when it raided Megaupload in January. So, to counter that kind of threat Mega will employ some technical countermeasures, including placing sets of servers in separate countries.

“So, even if one country decides to go completely berserk from a legal perspective and freeze all servers, for example — which we don’t expect, because we’ve fully complied with all the laws of the countries we place servers in — or if a natural disaster happens, there’s still another location where all the files are available,” Ortmann explained.

“This way, it’s impossible to be subjected to the kind of abuse that we’ve had in the U.S.,” he adds.

In late August, Kim Dotcom announced that Mega would grow to become a global network “to change the world.” Today he reinforced that position, telling Wired that the Mega network will encourage all hosts, from the small to the very large, to join up.

“We’re creating a system where any host in the world — from the $2,000 garage operation to the largest online host — can connect their own servers to this network,” he said. “We can work with anybody, because the hosts themselves cannot see what’s on the servers.”

As mentioned earlier, The Pirate Bay has also taken steps to ensure their security, but unlike Mega they offer zero cooperation to copyright holders. Right up front Mega say they will be offering full content takedown cooperation with movie and record companies, but it won’t be the free-for-all they previously enjoyed.

“This time, if they want to use that [takedown] tool, they’ll have to accept, prior to getting access, that they’re not going to sue us or hold us accountable for the actions of our users,” Dotcom concludes.

The encryption of files is an intriguing move and one that will have lawyers everywhere considering the implications. Whether it will be enough to keep the authorities at bay remains to be seen. We will soon find out.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • josh

    Awesome. Can’t wait. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it MPAA!

    • zoolander

      it’s all just a hype about his celebrity status imo!!

      • Anonymous

        Right and zoolander is what exactly? A fame whore? Did I get that right?

        • http://twitter.com/ElaineClaytor ElaineClaytor

          @like that old question: If you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of? I’m not afraid, I just don’t like taking a shit in public. @Loise, you make $27h…good for you! I make up to $85h working from home. My story is that I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45h to $85h…heres a good example of what i’m doing,..Goo.gl/4gQnU

        • AntiDesinfo

          Zoolander is an entertainment industry corporate pay troll assigned to TF in a Stalinist mission of disinformation.

          Just ignore.

          Do you realize that the entertainment industry can not find even one person from the general public on their side so they have to pay trolls?

          Is it not amazing?

        • http://sofia-l-ramirez.myopenid.com/ Sofia L.Ramirez

          @@The decryption key would not be stored by MegaUpload. @Loise, you make $27h…good for you! I make up to $8Oh working from home. My story is that I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $4Oh to $86h…heres a good example of what i’m doing,..Goo.Gl/Y6z3j

        • zoolander

          maybe it’s just a movie?! c’mon… stop sucking c***s guys, I’m just not a friend of this brainwash society… -MEGAUPLOAD IS DEAD-

        • Hut The Jabber

          @Zoolander – yes MegaUpload is dead, but the article is talking about its replacement ‘Mega’.

      • Maldoror

        What is this, a file locker for ANTS?

      • Guest

        If Dotcom is making an encrypted raid-proof filelocker just to hype himself, then I hope he keeps hyping himself.

      • AntiDesinfo

        I have a question: How long did it took you to vote 14 times for yourself, troll?

    • Mega-Hollywood-Shafter

      Mega has now fucking shafted MPAA, RIAA, MAFIAA so badly up their arses, their arses will be leaking encrypted users’ data.

      Take that you mother fucking bastards.

      Go eat shit.

    • JordanKratz

      Any thing that I can do to destroy the MAFIAA is OK with me.
      Go KD Go !!! And you too The Pirate Fucken Cloud……….. YEWAH

  • mrgogarty

    Well I’m not sure how this will work. The files are encrypted, okay – but are they stored centrally? Where are the backbones? Can’t they subpoena the encryption keys?

    • Haku

      The decryption key would not be stored by MegaUpload.

      • mrgogarty

        sounds kind of like oceanus

      • tigerkarp

        I’m guessing this scenario will play out more than once.
        1. Backup laptop on mega
        2. Store decryption key on laptop

    • Gremlin

      what??

      • anonymouse

        I think the Swiss are up to something similar…

        • Gulialjd

          wow if the swiss are making a better one than this then i cant wait for this new megaupload

        • http://www.studentscrunch.com/ ManiVasagam M

          Me.ga will be back with powerfull :)

          http://www.studentscrunch.com

    • OccamsKatana

      Encryption keys for what? How would they know what’s stored? They can’t assume guilt just because something is encrypted. They have no right to look into an encrypted file. What’s their probable cause?

      Oh, like that old question: If you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of? I’m not afraid, I just don’t like taking a shit in public. I’m entitled to a little privacy.

      Why do you have locks on your doors?

      • BobButtons

        No to mention, as the article states, the act first worry later approach. Having protection helps from those who don’t care if you’re acting legally or not.

      • Infonow

        I find a link on some website pointing to say, Adobe Master Suite 6, with a megaupload link and the key to decrypt.

        I download it, decrypt it, and confirm it’s the software.

        Then, I inform MegaTard that he’s hosting illegal software, with the link and tell him to remove it.

        if he fails to do so, he’ll just find himself in trouble again.

        While the files are encrypted, if people share the links and decryption key, they can follow it back to MegaTard.

        Can’t wait for MegaTard to send out more emails and payments to people to upload pirated stuff, too.

        • Anonymous

          Kill yourself.

        • AntiDesinfo

          Why did you change your name zoolander?

        • IHaveNoBalls

          Did you not read the article. He specifically said he wouldn’t accept take downs unless the party agreed to his TOS. He has lawyers working for him, i’m sure they will advise him correctly on what to do to stay LEGAL. that’s the over all goal it seems.

        • Federatn Aganst Softwar Theft

          Quote “I find a link on some website pointing to say, Adobe Master Suite 6, with a megaupload link and the key to decrypt.

          I download it, decrypt it, and confirm it’s the software.

          Then, I inform MegaTard that he’s hosting illegal software”

          You are fucking as dense as pig shit you bastardized worthless piece of iPad crap.

          Did you know anyone can download Adobe Master Creative Suite 6 for ** FREE ** directly from Adobe. Yes, that’s correct. Let me repeat that again since your head contains pig shit rather than neurons – anyone can download Adobe Master Creative Suite 6 for ** FREE ** directly from Adobe.

          Here’s the link:

          http://trials2.adobe.com/AdobeProducts/STAM/CS6/win32/MasterCollection_CS6_LS16.7z

          It’s 6.35 GB in size, but you need to create a free Adobe account before downloading.

          So how can it be illegal downloading from a Mega link when Adobe is giving it for free ? Every Adobe CS6 links on the net includes the file MasterCollection_CS6_LS16.7z listed above.

          In fact Mega would be doing Adobe a big favor by hosting Adobe CS6 for free on Mega’s servers, thereby saving Adobe considerable bandwidth and therefore $$$ on their subscriptions to CDNs/Akamai hosting.

          Now I suggest you shove your head up the arse of FASTiiS (www.fastiis.org) and enjoy the warm brown acrid pungent stink that is reminiscent of your utter fucking bullshit.

        • FinalApokylypse

          @Federatn Against Softwar Theft

          Two key flaws with your comment.

          1 – He was using an example, who cares if he didn’t check whether it was a free file.

          2 – More importantly just because its free software does not mean that they do not own a copyright and more to the point have stated they have designated distributors only, TV is an obvious example, its free to watch the Simpsons on TV but not OK for you to bypass it by downloading it off the net through ‘non-legal’ means. To reinforce this fact, you said yourself that you need to register on their site, this is indicative of someone who wants something from you in return for their free product. Mega would bypass this stage potentially.

        • Federatn Aganst Softwar Theft

          @FinalApokylypse

          Quote “1 – He was using an example, who cares if he didn’t check whether it was a free file.”

          Are you seriously telling me Adobe CS6 is free ? Yet Adobe charge US$2,599 for it on their website ? What Adobe is offering is a trial (ESD). One purchases a license to enable usage beyond a predetermined trial period.

          The same is true for most software – try before you buy. So it wouldn’t matter what example Infonow used, I would be correct on each occasion.

          You don’t need me to tell you this, as you probably know better, seeing that you are in that industry, aren’t you ?

          Quote “2 – More importantly just because its free software does not mean that they do not own a copyright and more to the point have stated they have designated distributors only,”

          I in no way claimed or stated that ownership of copyright was waived in any shape or form simply because software title X was download from a source other than an authorized one.

          In any case, upon installing most software, one is presented with a EULA to which one has to accept prior to using. By clicking the ‘accept’ button, it is indicative that one agrees to the legal small print presented, whether read or not.

          Quote “TV is an obvious example, its free to watch the Simpsons on TV but not OK for you to bypass it by downloading it off the net through ‘non-legal’ means.”

          Well that can’t be enforced. So it’s back to the drawing to device a DRM scheme that is kind and unobtrusive to paying users but equally robust to prevent bypassing/removing DRM.

          Quote “To reinforce this fact, you said yourself that you need to register on their site, this is indicative of someone who wants something from you in return for their free product. Mega would bypass this stage potentially.”

          Sure they want something. They want one’s email address so that the developer can target specific newsletters, offers, general info concerning the product one has downloaded. However more often than not, the developer often shares/sells one’s email address and other preferences within one’s profile to 3rd-parties, and that’s where intrusion of privacy begins to take afoot.

          One gets bombarded with crap and spam, till soon one’s inbox is full of shit.

          Solution: Use fake e-mail address and fake details, or use a free disposable email service if an email response is required.

          Quote “…Mega would bypass this stage potentially.”

          Now would you consider the use of a disposable email service as, potentially bypassing this stage, because it amounts to the same thing – the supposedly valuable data garnered from the fake profile is equivalent to not getting it at all (if d/l from Mega).

          And to ensure one cannot be tracked, one should delete all cookies generated by the developer’s servers, so upon a second later visit to the developer’s website, they wouldn’t know one has been there previously.

          BOTTOM-LINE
          One downloads software from the likes of Mega to avoid filling in intrusive forms prior to downloading and to avoid a cookie trail left on one’s PC. And most importantly, to prevent one’s inbox cluttered with fucking crap ads and spam.

          It’s all for the interest of security and privacy.

        • Pete Austin

          @Infonow, almost right, but you should have said, “I download it, decrypt it, and confirm it’s the software, [and confirm it was uploaded illegally].” There are lots of legal reasons to upload software, so you as an ordinary person unconnected with the rights owner wouldn’t be able to do the last part.

        • SomeoneElse

          You’ve already agreed to not sue Mega for the actions of their users, go sue the user.

          Is that the free trial or not? If it is the free trial, you’re on shaky ground anyhow.

          And here’s a biggie, I doubt you are Adobe or their authorized legal representative for copyright issues and so it is illegal for you to claim copyright infringement and get the file removed. You’ll have to leave that to the people it actually belongs to. Of course, if you really have a wild hair, you can inform them and see what they do. (Go look up Righthaven if you want a further take on those kinds of scams.)

        • Gofast

          Well smarty pants, just as soon as you complete you download & decryption, you too are guilty of piracy…

      • lattari

        This time fat boy has to give congressmen their cut. It’s a lot easier to make a few donations, no encryption needed. People will get to keep their data and he will get to stay at home.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Trying to make people in the general public realize that is slightly hard though. The “nothing to hide”-argument is pure sophistry meant to invoke guilt before reason hits.

        “When did you stop hitting your wife?”

        On being asked that, most people react reflexively and on the defensive. Because the argument already makes the statement that you are guilty.

      • Zzzzzz

        “If you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of?”

        If you don’t think I’m hiding something then why are you spying on me?

    • Ray186
    • Guest

      “Can’t they subpoena the encryption keys?”

      No because only the user have it. If you subpoena the user he can declare that he forgot the key which is very possible considering all the passwords we have to remember or that invoke to fifth.

      • Freedom of Speech

        In USA, 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the user can simply invoke the 5th Amendment Constitutional right to remain silent… game over for the police, they can’t get any evidence from your encrypted hard drive!

        EFF recommends the free TrueCrypt program or hard drive encryption. The FBI admitted in writing that they can’t crack Truecrypt’s encryption, earlier this year, right before the 11th Circuit ruled that the FBI could NOT force a CP suspect to give up the encryption key to his / her TrueCrypted hard drives.

    • Zarathustras Id

      If you’re smart enough to ask those questions you’re smart enough to answer them. Stop asking stupid questions.

  • anon

    MEGAHERO !!

    • Tremor

      Megalomaniac

      • Antidesinfo

        And you stop changing your name Zoolander.

  • Agozyen

    MPAA/RIAA will now go on the offensive against encryption and try to get that banned.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ender-Wiggin/100000885624281 Ender Wiggin

      too late, the gov’s been demonnizing encryption as a tool of hackers and criminals for a decade. fuck ‘em.

      • Revan343

        We took the wrong side.

    • Equilibrium_bis

      don’t *they * use encryption for their media? bluray and stuff?

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Yes…but with a blueray or DVD – or any other file which is meant to be displayed, the problem is that the video and audio will come out on a screen and through speakers. Meaning all you need to do is copy the output of the video/audio card and you have bypassed the encryption of the DVD entirely.

        In essence it just doesn’t make sense to encrypt something which will be displayed in a state fit for recording at will.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      The US political body, upon being told that modern encryption was, in essence, unbreakable, actually tried to have it banned under weapon export law.

      When they found that encryption is in fact pure math and that there’s a problem trying to illegalize mathematics and science, they quickly reversed course. Which is a good thing because otherwise we would have no online banking or legal online services – and everyone would be living on the darknet where such services would then exist.

      Honestly, everytime I hear some idiot politician arguing for “banning encryption” I have to laugh…

  • Derp

    What about thermorectal cryptoanalyzer usage?

    • Sleepy

      Rubber-hose cryptanalysis aka thermorectal cryptanalysis for those who don’t know.

      • Bloaxor

        Thermorectal Craptanalysis*, Mr. Sleepy President.

  • John Space

    Sometimes defeating an enemy is the best way of helping the latter to be undefeatable. Thanks MAFIAA!

    • Anonymous

      They didn’t defeat the enemy, they won one battle, in a war they’ll never win.

  • Agozyen

    They can subpoena the keys but the only ones with the keys are the end users. If that’s the case then law enforcement will have to have prior knowledge of the contents of the encrypted file in order for them to get a subpoena. In theory anyways.

    • Guest

      linking sites will post the encryption keys along with links……they won’t need to subpoena them.

      The US government will still label mega as a criminal organisation as they will see mega as only using encryption because they know the service will be used to infringe copyright.

    • KimDotTard

      and those end users will be sharing the decryption keys, etc, etc.

      MegaTard will still have to remove content that is infringing, because if they fail to do so, it’s cause to go after Kim DotTard again.

      it just won’t be as easily searchable. but people will post links and decryption keys….

      • IHaveNoBalls

        shut up mate

      • Guest

        If a copyright holder finds that his stuff is being shared on the web then all they have to do is submit a DMCA with the link and the file will be removed. Unlike the previous Megaupload this time around if the same file is uploaded by say 100 people then there will be 100 separate files on all the server all with there own encryption/decryption code and to hav4 all these 100 files removed will require 100 DMCA requests. If the movie studios etc. want to have direct access to the system so they can delete the files themselves like they did before then they will only be given that if they agreed in writing that they will not sue or bring legal action against Mega.

        • Hut The Jabber

          DMCA notices won’t work. Mega will not be hosted in the US at all and as such will not fall under the jurisdiction of the US DMCA laws. They won’t be obliged to respond to takedown requests anymore, however as a gesture of goodwill they will offer to take down files which are flagged by rights owners as long as the rights owner first agrees to Mega’s Terms (which include not holding Mega liable for content uploaded by users and accepting that Mega could not have known that the particular content had been uploaded). Those terms will be enforceable under all local jurisdictions and will serve to both protect Mega from other legal attacks and give them a legally binding document with which to counter any such attempt.

        • Rocko

          The trick of MU was, that they could faster “copy/link” a file from the cloud then they could react to an DCMA/Takedown. With encrypted files, this is much harder. A bluray movie isn’t reuploaded within 1 hour.

          Then you have the problem of “repeated” offenders, which are practically kicked out everywhere. As long new-MU keeps them (and their monetary accounts) valid even being a repeat offender, the old “fencing digital goods” argument will stand. Also MU had lots of “artificial” limits how many links you can report, which also adds to the “insult”:

          The whole encryption thing is a nice legal argument – BUT ONLY if done on the client side WHILE uploading. If the server encrypts it, you gain nothing legally. Thats the reason people add drivers/encryption schemes LOCALLY before using things like Dropbox. Only then the hoster/provider is free of knowledge (“plausible deniability”).

          I wish Kim lots of luck. But with this ideas, he is just playing an new complex hide and seek again.

  • wcg

    What they need to do is provide a component of the server system that you can download and use yourself. A self-subscribed bot, if you will, that you control the storage and bandwidth it provides. Traffic in an out is encrypted and not necessarily files, just data streams. This way you are not sharing identifiable files. I could see people willing to subscribe to that to help the “swarm”. This differs from BitTorrent in that you are just providing a small piece of the cloud service not particular files. Your download and upload activities are separate. Sure your IP address is exposed but no one, including new Megaupload would be able to trace your activity to any particular file. Again, the weakness will be the indexing sites for the downloads. However, the database for the index could be part of the cloud too. Distributed search and file identification would eliminate the need for an index site.

    • Anonymous

      Such systems have been around for over a decade. See Freenet and GnuNet. There’s a tradeoff, however, amongst speed, avoiding stuck partial downloads, and resistance to censorship.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        You should read the latest Freenet Toad’s Blog as well. According to one posted by some people on various Frost boards, Toad is getting worried that he might have to ‘compromise’ Freenet or the Freenet auto-updater because of U.K. laws (he supposedly lives there) that are being written today and wouldn’t be able to tell anyone.

        So he is encouraging anyone and everyone to learn how to compile Freenet themselves. I’m sorry but I looked at that and it’s just too hard, even with my techie background, to compile Freenet myself.

        The U.K. needs to be told that they cannot require backdoors in encrypted and obfuscated networks out of the porous ‘terrorism’ fear.

        Let’s be real: This stuff has been out for 10 years +, encryption of e-mails and terrorists are still doing stuff over clearnet?

        Not a big issue, the terrorists. Terrorists also are not a big issue in general considering how few terrorist attacks we have outside of Muslim countries compared to how many people live in those countries.

        It’s mainly a Muslim country thing, not a first world thing.

        • Hut The Jabber

          “It’s mainly a Muslim country thing, not a first world thing.”

          Of course, the majority muslim population of Northern Ireland supports your claim ;)

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Northern Ireland is majority Muslim? Okay, then I will codify my statement: RADICAL Muslim countries.

          That pretty much leaves out Northern Ireland and only does those Middle Eastern, Shariah-law countries.

        • Hut The Jabber

          OK, but what about Israel?

  • Clap Trap

    The REAL fucking burning question is whats going to happen to my legitimate shit I uploaded to this fat fucking marshmallows site?

    • Somewhere

      If you didn’t have backups you are the only one to blame. The sooner you accept blame for your actions the sooner you’ll resolve all kinds of issues in life. Try it out sometime.

      • Guest

        Nope, I’m pretty sure the gangsters that illegally raided Megaupload and stole its servers are to blame.

      • Buglord

        that place WAS the backups for some, because online storeage is a lot more safe backup compared to a cd in a box somewhere, what if fire, you know?

        • IHaveNoBalls

          “because online storage is a lot more safe backup compared to a cd in a box somewhere”
          I think mega-uploads shutdown has proved the opposite of what you said.

          As for a fire burning you’re DVD’s, maybe keep 2 or 3 backups of a single dvd in different locations? That’s what I’d do but I’d me more worried about the fire burning and killing me than burning the DVD’s

      • KimDotTard

        When will Kim DotTard accept the blame that he paid people for uploading pirated stuff?

        Oh…wait…

        • IHaveNoBalls

          He properly did and when will Sony accept they are selling people DVD-Rs which they in turn use to burn copyrighted material they don’t own.. Who cares if he offered people money to upload. His business made money, people are motivated by money to upload so he paid people to upload.. Makes sense to me as a business model. Meanwhile he said in his TOS that he Megaupload would not pay out if the files were infringing copyright.. Youve said loads of shit but with no real insight.. Say something that isn’t just trolling or GTFO.

        • IHaveNoBalls

          To the Trolls:

          I’m really sick of you trolls, if there’s anything that’s even slightly controversial, you have to step in like you know everything with your dumb one lined comments… no-one cares what you think, fuck off and die :D

        • Scary_Devil_Monastery

          I see the “50 cent army” is out in force again.

          Or at least I hope they are. Because if you aren’t even getting paid for inane rubbish of that sort, I should feel very sorry for myself, were I you.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          He did that. He also pointed out however that when he was INFORMED that those people were uploading stuff they did not own the copyrights to, he dropped them from the payment program.

          Of course, since he only had a e-mail address for most of them, maybe at most a shipping address for the checks, it was impossible for him to keep those same people from coming back and posting stuff again, getting paid for it.

        • chronoss chiron

          @IHaveNoBalls
          shut up you harry no dickhead marsupial
          your arguments are as dumb as you posting them.
          THIS is akin to someone as ive said having to have everyone license a hammer cause some crazy killed someone with a hammer….
          just cause you find ways to do shit with a hammer no one imagined doesnt mean the maker should be liable , especially if your an adult with NON RETARDED MIND that can be said to be responsible for your actions.

          if the world worked like you did NOTHING would ever get done….

    • .dll

      I think all legit data will be returned to owners (or at least copies of them). I assume that megaupload.com & megavideo.com (plus that third video-related mega* site which I wont unveil here) domains will be returned to Kim too.

    • Bloaxor

      That’s not relevant to this new “Mega” thing going on in this article.
      That’s relevant in the court case that’s been going on for nine months now, sadly. :c

    • Anonymous

      try giving the us DoJ aring. they’re the ones stopping everyone from accessing their own files, not Dotcom

      • Conservative

        Obama can return all the files any time he wants. But he does not like people so he will never return them voluntarily.

    • Andrew Lee

      Take it up with the RIAA/MPAA they’ll surely give you access to reclaim your legal files.

      Oh wait I’m wrong lol they have no problem holding your shit hostage to protect servers with pirated shit that’s still accessible all over the web.

  • Megaman

    Can’t wait to go MEGA!

    • Jimmy Rustler

      wow, stfu -_-

      • JimmyTroll

        Whats wrong with supporting someone who supports file sharing?

        • Dustin

          He doesn’t support filesharing. He is a fat guy who wants to make money. Check out what he did to one or the other blog writer. He sent 5 lawyers up their asses at once to force them put information offline which he didn’t like to be seen online. Ever since I read that, I’m of the opinion that Kim is nothing more than a greedy little fat guy who deserves to be imprisoned. He gives a damn about freedom of speech/information.

          Just my two cents.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Only in your opinion Dustin is he a ‘fat guy who wants to make money’. Now, that might be ONE of his reasons for making this service, it does not have to be his sole or even his major reason.

        • Nevets Lleb

          It’s nice

        • KimDotTard

          Chris – it’s my opinion that Kim DotTard is just as much of a moron as Assange.

          He’s gonna get busted again when he refuses to take down infringing software that’s on the new Megawhatever because people will continue to post links as well as decryption keys.

          If you think the government, or people who will help the government, won’t report those links and info, you’re dead wrong.

        • Guest

          @kimdottard Any copyright holder who finds a link to there copyright will have to submit a DMCA request and the file will be removed. If they don’t send a DMCA request then the file will not be removed. Dotcom will not get busted again for not removing copyright files as all DMCA requests will be dealt with.

        • Guest

          @kimdottard – Also, Any person or government points out and informs Mega that there are infringing files and tells him to remove files all they want, Any infringing files will not be removed unless it is the actual copyright holder of the file in question who submits the DMCA request. Governments and people can argue about infringing files all they want but if they are not the actual copyright owner of the file then they will not get removed. As long as Dotcom complies with all DMCA requests that are indeed submitted by the actual copyright owner then he won’t get busted. Any DMCA request that is not submitted by the actual copyright owner of the file may result in action being made against them for submitting a false DMCA take down request because they in a way have committed perjury in stating that they are the copyright owner when in fact they are not.

        • DoNotreply

          @Nevets Lleb

          You don’t know just how factual that statement is (hint: US ‘Federal’ Reserve)

        • Rocko

          Not deleting the files wasn’t half as problematic – the problematic part was that a) he knew what files are there and b) he had artificial limits how much files you can report (the reason youtube has its darn filters in place – it would cost too much time to find them all with the billion files around). The third thing was not cleaning shop by booting repeat offenders (which files get DCMA-d all the time).

          If he does this all, it would be interesting to see if his shop makes enough dough to not become the next (practically dead for the underground) HF or china hosters like FS. It seems that those new russian hosters are the only ones who don’t care about anything in this regard, but react insanely fast to takedown requests.

        • chronoss chiron

          @guest and if he is living in a nation and hosts it in a nation that does not recognize the dmca then your entire argument “guest” is moot.

    • Uchiha_123

      to be honest i think megabox is overhyped because of Kim’s ‘star persona’ – there are plenty of similar filehosting services out there…

      • OthersWantYouToPay

        And the pay rate for other services is how much? Oh wait don’t tell me its low rater blah blah blah bs.

  • Dark

    AES of what strength is my question? Given MEGA will be a huge operation it doesn’t seem at all unreasonable to expect at least 1024-bit encryption.

    • Anonymous

      You misunderstand symmetric vs. asymmetric key encryption algorithms. AES is a symmetric encryption algorithm, only defined for key strengths of 128, 192, and 256 bits. Even 128-bit AES is currently thought to be sufficiently strong for the foreseeable future.

      The asymmetric 1024+ bit keys you’re talking about are almost always used to store randomly generated symmetric keys (or exchange secrets used to generate such keys).

      RSA and El Gamal (in a finite field modulo a prime) would need keys of at least 1024 bits (actually more like 2048 bits these days). The discrete log problem over elliptic curves appears currently intractable for field sizes as small as 255 bits (though, I’d use the NIST 521-bit curves) as long as the curve parameters are very carefully chosen.

      If you’re going to beg for the bigger gee bees, make sure to ask if the bits can be stored in your favorite color.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Now, now, no need for that. Unfortunately, any marketer launching into a sales pitch has gone with the assumption that bigger numbers sound better. Which is why we end up with “normal” people assuming that the minimum standard of encryption key bitlength is 16k or some similarly absurd number.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      According to the NSA AES-256 is sufficiently strong to merit government use on material considered “Top secret”.

      Even 128-bit AES encryption is today considered completely unbreakable. Indeed, cracking AES of any of the existing forms is considered an unreachable goal within the foreseeable future, even if we manage to break the 5 nm barrier on transistor density within the next 50 years.

      AES, however, is a very secure algorhitm rendering brute-force cracking impossible by any means at our disposal until we actually achieve working quantum computing.

      • chronoss chiron

        128 bit aes may have weakness by a super computer but is considered bank level security and while quantum computers might be able to cut cracking by as much as a 4th , for 256 bit aes thats still 250 million year son the fastest known super computer….

        NOW do you see why i’d like to see aes on bittorrent? and news groups …
        AND yes you can setup a website to use ONLY AES if your clients browser allows it.

        • BJonesTF

          deary me, you’ve clearly got no clue about cryptography

    • chronoss chiron

      ssl is in flavours of 1024 and upwards , but due to most servers compressing the stream its possible to exploit the key and thus CRACK it, thus you need to take off compression ( more bandwidth costs ) OR not use SSL and use AES with no compression to make sure there is not another issue with ssl later on.

  • Anonymous

    If they still employ same policy that they had before where inactive files gets deleted after 30 days then any adversary could still argue that the site encourages uploading of extremely popular files such as warez.

    • Dark

      Then the same could be argued for sites like CrapidShare.

      • Anonymous

        Well, Rapidshare is hosted in another jurisdiction, won several court cases already and are using several measures to decrease piracy on their severs (such as suspending accounts and having their own bots searching for infringing links)

        Dotcom is probably worse off.

        • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

          Rapidshare is doing much more than they are legally required to do and wasting a fuckton of money by doing so. I am surprised that their stockholders haven’t been taking issue with this outlay of dollars.

          Also, Rapidshare is still used for piracy just as much if not more today than it was 5 years ago.

  • The 2nd law

    You know the US government will design a “Stuxnet” virus to attack these servers or the downloader.

    • No

      I doubt it after all this will most likely be the second website that the U.S gov will most likely not be able to get rid of, piratebay being the second website.

    • NubLuver66

      The US is blocked from using this service, infections will have to come from Iran.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        With all due respect, I don’t see anywhere that he is going to keep United States users from using this service. Nowhere in that article is that even alluded to.

      • CLL

        The way that I have interpreted it, the US is not blocked from using the system, it’s just that he will not allow any US servers to connect to his site to help host. That makes total sense, as it was the US servers that really helped screw Megaupload in the first place.

        • KimDotTard

          I’ll setup plenty of servers to connect to it via vpn’ed connections, etc, so he won’t know where they are :)

        • Hut The Jabber

          @KimDotTard then you’ll be personally liable for breaking your own country’s laws (assuming you’re from the US). Well done troll.

    • chronoss chiron

      i hear the usa has its own virus issues lately….seems someone reverse engineered there crap and gave it back….
      OH and you dont get AES encryption very well do ya….with a CRAY sized pc it would take a billion years to crack how you think one stupid software is gonna do that per each person per each account ?

      stupid post you odnt get tech and thats why you will fail.

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        Because you don’t even try to bruteforce the encryption if you have even half a clue. You lift the key directly from the system doing the encryption/decryption by using a suitable trojan.

        That of course presents problems if it means you have to compromise at least one computer in each BT swarm in order to be able to crack even a single set of transmissions.

        A variant of the stuxnet (or any other well written virus exploiting a difficult-to-patch vulnerability) could of course turn any infected computer into a DDoS-bot, running a variant of Jester’s old script against all other members of the swarm.

        The collateral damage would be extreme but since when did that ever stop the pro-copyright crowd?

  • Bo

    Analogy with the arms race: tougher armor gives tougher ordinance gives tougher armor….. ad infinitum until we have reached The Bomb. Then everything returns to status quo, albeit on a higher level.

  • Anon

    “Ironclad” is bullshit. ANY method that will seek to facilitate free copying of a for-sale digital product will be rendered illegal through new legislation and shut down, with increasing punishments until pirates wake up. Where is the digital marketplace if piracy is allowed to prosper?

    You people crack me up. yeah. Governments are just going to stand by and let their digital industries be ransacked. Roll another one. lol

    • P.S.Y.K.O

      Ooh, I would see that day when pirates really wake up! Then there will be only slaves around, my little cum dumpster!

    • http://www.facebook.com/tucker.church.7 Tucker Church

      ZZzzzzZZZzzzzzz

    • MadAsASnake

      you’d argue that a beaver building a dam facilitates file sharing if it suits your argument. What Dotcom is implementing is DMCA compliant. What legislation are you suggesting forcing through? criminalising people for being German? criminalising the transfer of data? criminalising anything the MPAA does not like? I hope you are right, the extra-judicial taketowns have to stop – the MPAA/RIAA need to stop ransacking peoples lives for things that are legal.

      • KimDotTard

        If Kim DotTard removes infringing links, etc, as they are reported, then he’s complying.

        Until he gets caught, again, paying people to upload pirated stuff…

        • Guest

          He was never caught paying people to upload pirated stuff. MAFIAA trolls just love to make shit up, don’t they?

          Also, MU was already complying with the DMCA when they raided him, which makes this whole fiasco extra retarded.

    • Guest

      C’mon, Anon, this shit is getting old. Where’s your claim that pirates are pussies and have been breaking less law over the last decade? Pirates breaking less law or more of it? Get with the program, you inconsistent industry cocksucker.

    • Guest

      “ANY method that will seek to facilitate free copying of a for-sale digital product will be rendered illegal through new legislation”

      In your sad little dreams, maybe. In the real world, all the new copyright legislation designed to do this has been getting smacked down like a bitch.

      “Where is the digital marketplace if piracy is allowed to prosper?”

      Piracy is currently allowed to prosper and the digital marketplace is thriving. Whoops, did I just kill your argument?

      By the way, isn’t Anon’s reasoning awesome? The copyright industry tried to kill Megaupload, totally fucked up at it, and now Megaupload is about to come back bigger, better, and more bulletproof than ever. So Anon declares victory for the copyright industry. lol @ MAFIAA logic

      • Scary_Devil_Monastery

        I have a theory that “Anon” is actually Baghdad Bob. The new employer seems to share a lot of similarities with his old Boss…

    • You Are in the Minority.

      No, you should wake up. Your mom is a pirate. Your neighbor is one too. Even your boss and his wife. You must join us. Resistance is futile. You’ll be assimilated either out of your free will, or you’ll be forced to.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      Yes, well, the one and only way to “legislate” this problem away is by either not enforcing such legislation as would be required – in essence turning everyone even using a computer into a criminal as the legislation would have to be EXTREMELY wide-ranging.

      Or in trying to enforce it in which case the internet will have to cease.

      Why do you think China, willing and able to kill people over government dissent, have already given up on even trying to police the net? They’ve wasted ten years and a godawful amount of Yuan into creating the most draconian online environment ever seen.

      And dissidents still do exactly as they like online. And filesharers amount to 62% of the estimated Chinese online population of a few hundred million.

      In short, Anon, you can keep spouting your bull, but it doesn’t alter the fact that what you’re trying to sell us is as foreign to reality as the concept of personal teleportation within the next 25 years. It assumes a level of computer science coming straight from Hogwarts.

  • Flamethrower

    But how encryption is supposed to protect Kim from videos on Megavideo?

  • J2dud299

    What happened to Oron?

  • Placeb0x

    Love this. As an extra step block all US IP blocks.
    And make sure to not be US lover in any shape or form.

  • Pingback: In the News.. | TorGuard.net Blog - Anonymous VPN Services

  • Dustin

    Unless the file will be encrypted on the people’s computer and then uploaded, Mega should be well aware of which files have been uploaded to their servers…

    • Violated0

      Just split the two aspects into separate companies.

      Company one allows the file uploads and does the encryption. Then company two does the storage and supply. Company two then does not know the files and company one did not store them.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Most SMART people who are uploading things that might be ‘copyright infringing’ are already passwording those files and/or splitting files so that it is impossible to tell what is in the files.

      • ChristyIsATard

        And those same people will be posting the links, decryption keys, passwords, etc, somewhere.

        Don’t think that that info will get out somewhere?

        • Fluballuba

          The really sad thing for those trying to take down any content that people want to share will be finding the myriad of sites that will provide info on what files have what content. I suspect they will have to hire tens of thousands of people to browse sites and become members of sites to find the keys needed to open the files to prove they are copyright works.
          This I doubt will be able to be done with a simple software program , especially if the passwords are supplied in a way that a software program cannot access them.

  • Johny

    “Ortmann says, Mega will also grant direct access to their servers for entities such as film studios, allowing them to remove copyright-infringing material themselves.”

    • Guest

      and direct access will only be given access to them if they sign an agreement before hand stating that they will not sue Mega in any way. From a business point this makes sense.

  • Lool

    So it’s a filehost with password protected RARs for the nubs to scream “FAKE” at?

  • Dondilly

    Though there is no legal requirement to do so, the MAFIAA with argue that mega should be trawling forums for publically posted links.

    As i see it, the one flaw to encryption is that while it makes media company demands for backend access pointless, it wont stop the flood of DMCA takedown notices triggered by rights owners scrapping google and known filesharing forums. Anywhere a file link its posted, it will have a plain english description (along with the encryption key) not that many media
    outfits ever bother verifying the files they are DMCAing.

    Another issue is that joker stirring up trouble for cloud lockers with payment transaction companies. As stated on TF paypal has already changed its terms and is demanding backend access, others may follow. The fact the data is encrypted to acheive plausible deniability for the host is at risk of being seen as being obstructive. There is also what i will term as the wikileaks payment problem. The common forms of payment require visa, mastercard backed bank cards or a paypal account. All 3 are American and legal or not, as wikileaks found, they will block transactions at the request of the DOJ and KDC isnt exactly on the DOJs christmass card list.

    So encryption serves little purpose as the DOJ will enforce dmca compliance or serve an economic death sentence through a payment blockade and dmca notices will still flow by scrapping external sites. The fact Mega cant verify the file has no effect under the DMCA. On receipt of a notice, a host has to take down the content then notify the account holder. It is for the account holder to contest the notice if it is in error, not the host.

    Finally, encryption will increase storage overheads as it inhibits the ability to store a single instance of duplicate files.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      PayPal is being told where they can stick it by a lot of filesharing websites over that stipulation.

      They are refusing to kowtow to that.

      Oh, and by the way: Visa and Mastercard are NOT just United States entities. They are multi-national entities who could conceivably move out of country with their operations and tell the U.S. where to stick it.

      The last point is correct: This will increase storage overheads, however it is a case of ‘no other alternative solution’ here.

    • Anonymous

      “On receipt of a notice, a host has to take down the content then notify the account holder. It is for the account holder to contest the notice if it is in error, not the host.”

      Not quite. When a site receives a DMCA notice, they can choose to
      A) Keep the content there, but risk being sued along with the uploader
      B) Delete the content, and keep their “safe harbours” i.e. they can’t now be sued.
      True though, most sites delete, so as to keep themselves safe.

      • Fluballuba

        Mega did abide by the DMCA and had safe harbour rights , these were ignored when the court case was implemented, so safe harbour is nonsense and not something that helps anyone… so that carrot can no longer be used.

      • Dondilly

        I think you will find that if the host reinstates a file after being formerly notified by the account holder that the notice is in error and will be contested, liability for the file passes from the host to the account holder and the host’s safe harbour protection remains intac,t.

  • MadAsASnake

    … and I think the best bit is that they will demand that any rights holder wants to use the DCMA takedowns has to formally accept that Mega has safe harbour.

    • SnakeSkin

      Except that if mega complied, they already would have safe harbor.

      Retards like you don’t understand that when you don’t remove the infringing content, much less, PAY people to upload infringing content, your safe harbor provisions go away, no matter what is “agreed” to.

      • Guest

        Trolls like you don’t understand that nobody is buying your bullshit.

        • MadAsASnake

          Thanks Guest

          @SnakeSkin – personal attacks are not etiquette and not helpful. DMCA requires mega remove the links, not the content, which is fair given that a.) the accusation is only an accusation (and Mega, or anyone, has to put it back up if successfully challenged) and b.) most takedown requests are not even legal as they requesters generally have no clue as to what the file is. MAFIAA did not get the law they wanted here – the legislators wrote in some safeguards against free speech, fair use, neutrality issues – all of which apply here. All DotCom is demanding is that the industry plays fair, as they are demanding of him. I don’t beleive DotCom has actually done either of the things you accuse him of. Even if he has, these a civil matters, and need to be proven in a court of law. I would note that US DOJ won’t even forward a proper indictment let alone the evidence they claim to have…. now why would that be?

  • Walter

    so no more megavideo?
    :(

  • Guest

    so if all the files will be encrypted, what will be the point of the copyright holder removal tool?

    • n00b

      Been wondering that too.
      If the files are encrypted, how can the copyright henchmen find offending files?
      And if they send a request anyways, how can Mega verify or reject the claim, given they don’t have encryption keys?
      If they comply automatically, the copyright henchmen could basically take down anything and wreak all sorts of havoc.

      • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

        Simple: By parsing links on various websites and downloading the files in question from MegaUpload to make sure that the stuff is actually their product before sending a DMCA.

        Of course, they are going to moan and groan that it is too ‘labor-intensive’ to do that but…… I honestly say fuck them, it’s the proper way to do things.

        • ChrisFuckYou

          I properly say:

          fuck you

  • Guest

    The last few paragraphs make complete sense – given the bloodthirsty nature of copyright holders and their willingness to go after anyone regardless of collateral damage, it’s about time companies put their foot down; not just Megaupload. If enforcement of penalties against irresponsible copyright enforcement is toothless, it’s up to the public to protect themselves from the ruthless process. Companies want to protect their users as their users expect to be protected. Rampant takedowns regardless of whether content is actually infringing or not has consequences.

  • Sattsamm

    Sounds to me like fatboy might jsut be onto something there. Wow.
    Anon.at.tc

  • Anonymous

    i think a previous comment could be true whereby the entertainment industries start to lobby for outlawing encryption. that will also include proxies and vpns. one way or another, they will get what they have been after all along. control of the best media distribution platform on the planet, allowing downloads only from their sites, whilst being able to charge maximum bucks for minimal outlay. remember, there will be no shops or physical items. all will be done as digital downloads.

    • Guest

      Well if they do then they will be cutting their own throats with the same sword as they too use encryption etc.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      The unavoidable collateral damage as follows: Online banking, online purchasing, any online confidentiality and thus no more email…similarly VoIP and legal streaming services now all have to go away.

      That is the cost of even tampering with encryption laws.

      Meaning that any nation not enforcing these laws will immediately conquer the digital markets of every nation which DOES enforce such laws. China would love it if the western barbarians made such a huge blunder.

  • Violated0

    Encrypting files is a welcomed move to protect against the prying and spying by everyone but I see two small flaws in this. The first flaw is if files are uploaded encrypted then so can the Copyright Cartel insist on an upload filter check. Likewise since they generate the encryption key then questions soon asked why don’t they store the key for things like police checks for kiddie porn. Still at the current time no one can force them to do either which does lead to a legally perplexing situation.

    My other pondering is that while this is fine for backups, even if many people will forget their key and lose their files in the process, then how exactly is someone supposed to share files with their friends? We hear are of course pro-file-sharing and it is not like the file-sharing world is yet running around with encryption keys.

    Still this is a welcome move when since our very privacy and anonymity is under attack by countless organizations then the whole future is about encryption to keep those prying and spying eyes away. It is then just a shame that CP traders and real terrorists would utilize those same resources.

    • http://profiles.google.com/zerianis10 Christopher Kidwell

      Violated, you miss that NO website bans encrypted/passworded uploads and they rely on reports from USERS in the case of child porn 99.9% of the time to take down child pornography.

      Which, brings up an obvious problem here in the first place: if the people who are making the reports are surfing for child porn and are not the police, are they not open to liability for ‘procuring child porn’ themselves since they would have to download and open the child porn (which is 99.9% of the time according to my cousin in the FBI encrypted) to make sure that it is actually child pornography and not just lolicon (drawn or CG pictures of children in sexual situation, which is legal in the United States and elsewhere in the world)?

      A discussion that needs to be done.

    • Freedom of Speech
  • Bob

    Meh. I’ll stick with the ‘groups. Havn’t let me down in almost two decades of use.

  • Jimbo

    you can bet your bottom dollar the entertainment industries lobbying will go up several gears now. they will get government backing again and a new plan will be put into operation to bring this and TPB down. anyone that thinks there will be no repercussions better think again! i hope all works out but with governments in general and the USA in particular, going down the ‘we must keep the old business models going and fuck innovation and progress’ routes, they wont worry about any ‘collateral damage’ as long as the sites they want are taken down and those running them are jailed. remember, no one was expecting the glorified balls up made over Megaupload or the fight back. the USA dont like anyone standing up to them or especially making them look stupid by revealing facts that were supposed to remain hidden. they are typical cowards that will pull out all the dirty tricks imaginable to get revenge! i hope the precautions are much better than a durex against pregnancy!

  • Billyboo

    Absolutely fantastic plan, here. The only way for entertainment industries to make any attempt to stop this would be to go after the end users. Considering that all data is encrpyted, they would then need probable cause to justify their decryption of said data. A massive headache for prosecuters and defense attorneys alike and I am positive will see some huge debacles of court cases very soon regarding this.

    Good thing there will be servers placed worldwide to counter government lobbying from nation to nation.

  • Waseihou

    They could have moved even further – split the file into two (first even bytes, the other odd bytes), encrypt each other, and then upload each file to a host owned by a different company. That way no company would own any real data. The way it is coded would allow to decrypt it on the fly and play it while downloading.

    Regarding law, the encryption must be done at user side, or it will be at least problematic regarding EU law. According to EU, carrier MUST NOT change data in order to avoid responsibility for they content. While encrypting them actually does not change them, as ony way the information is encoded changed, this view would have to be tested at a court. Was it a change or not? The safest option would then be to encrypt it with java at client side, it would also help with speed. Well, a good CPU have HW acceleration, so their servers won’t have problems in case it would be needed.

    On the other way they must encrypt in order to avoid someone uploading unencrypted data. Best solution would have an external company do the encryption, so access to Mega would be only through a “third” party which would be liable for user content. But if it was just a paper tiger run by a white horse who would be actually homeless drunked man, then it would be safe for them.

  • ThumbsUpThumbsDown

    For Copyright Holders, as for their p2p adversaries, explaining reality is a life or death responsibility.

    Imagine a race track where Death is the anonymous adversary. The Announcer leans over and tells Fat Kim, “Kim! Your Adversary’s best time for the mile is 2.25 minutes! You must beat him, or….” and he makes the classic gesture of a razor gliding slowly over a fat throat.

    This matters greatly; because, it’s probably not publicly known, but Big Kim’s best time for the mile (clocked during a mad dash to a six egg breakfast) was a little under half an hour.

    Six big assistants strap a number across Kimmie’s chest. The Announcer cries out, “On your mark!” Kim can only blink in confusion. “Get set!” Kim wonders what his life would’ve been like as a poor gay hairdresser in Berlin. “Go!” One shot is heard.

    Now, Kim is no gazelle; but, Mama made him fat, not stupid. So, run he does. He staggers past the quarter mile post; eyes bugging, wheezing like an octogenarian water buffallo. He wallows past the half mile turn. At the three quarter mile post, he realizes to his horror that his adversary is nowhere to be seen. The adversary is either hopelessly far ahead; or, hopelessly far behind. Kim doesn’t think that his enemy is hopelessly far behind. So, he keeps running.

    He sees the crowed, rising as one to its feet. The checkered flag; raised high, waves in the wind. The crowed roars. Signs read, “Yeah Kimmie, baby!”, “Go for it, fat boy!”, “Remember! Life or Death, honey!”

    Then the madly waving checkered flag comes sharply down; and Big Kim realizes it is down for him. He has won!.

    The crowed catches Fat Boy just before he drops. The Announcer forces his way next to Kimmie and Announces, “Kimmie! You have won! How is it Possible. You! The slowest Man in the world, against Death, the fastest “it” in the cosmos! How did it happen? You have three chances to answer this question correctly. Do so; and, you will win forty virgins from the Mustang Ranch to sit ion your face for all eternity!”

    Kim’s first answer: “He got disqualified! Attacked the Pirates Bay guys with a machete at the quarter turn.”

    The Announcer looked at him in shock, “Wrong! Death is a perfect gentleman. Always plays by the rules!”

    Kim’s second answer. “It was the three week seafood salad! He caught the tomaine just before the three quarter mile post!”

    The Announcer shook his head. “Wrong! He was in perfect health! Death always is! It’s everyone else that gets sick! Last chance Kimmie!”

    Kim’s third answer. “He had a bad day! Ran the slowest race of his career!”

    The announcer smiled broadly. “Wrong! Fastest race he ever ran!”

    With this the Announcer started to leave. I barely caught him at the gate. I said, “Look! I’m going to tell the whole world you’re a race-rigging scam artist unless you come clean on what’s the real deal here.”

    He motioned for me to lower my voice; and, brought his lips close to my ear, “They are his rules! He didn’t break any. He was in perfect shape. He’s never otherwise. He ran his best race. He’s never been known to run anything other than his best time! He ran really fast. ” Then he pushed me away and stared at me.

    “So?” I insisted.

    He pulled me back and whispered, “He ran really, really fast…..in the wrong direction.”

    And this is the unsolvable problem at the heart of global Copyright: It doomed to run very fast in the wrong direction.

    • Porky The Copyright Pig

      Good story, but it’s not nice to make fun of morbidly obese people.

    • Scary_Devil_Monastery

      That’s a +1 likes for you right here. :)

  • Gvdrthbfv

    A good location for servers would be West Samoa

  • MoreChaosTheory

    I sense a new wind blowing in favor for the pirates… The PirateBay and megaupload becoming raid proof. I’m getting a tingly feeling just thinking about it.

  • jack murdock

    lol so in other words, their groundbreaking new plan is to look the other way?

    • LAscreenwriter_1

      LOL I swear, as I was reading the article, I had the exact same reaction and was going to post it, but you beat me to it. So congrats!

  • lattari

    “[tpb] they offer zero cooperation to copyright holders.”

    I love it.

    For anyone who hasn’t done it already, I recommend tpb/legal or http://tpb.fl.ax/nph-tpb.cgi/00/687474702s7468657069726174656261792r73652s6p6567616p

    It makes a hilarious reading.

    • http://twitter.com/krozareq krozareq

      aye but TPB is merely a magnet listing site. They don’t physically host anything. Comparing apples and oranges.

  • mc007

    its a paid service like all the others then ? encryption won’t help here anyway. so finally we can stay with torrents and usenet which seems still really the best mix to be up-to-date with the latest hollywood stuff.

  • nulloid

    it’s like the internet’s internet!

  • Mizerydearia

    This reminds me of Tahoe-LAFS

  • Teiji

    I’m confused. So Mega won’t store the decryption keys on their servers, right? Then if RIAA/MPAA do a DMCA takedown, how would Mega check the files if they (the files) are indeed copyrighted if they (Mega) don’t have the decryption keys?

    • http://twitter.com/krozareq krozareq

      I am assuming that the copyright representatives will have the key because the file was posted in a public place such as a forum or list of sorts by the uploader. If keys match, then it gets taken down.

      So uploaders can’t be fools about posting the keys just anywhere.

  • Pingback: The New Megaupload Has A Super Clever Way To Avoid Getting Raided Again | Gizmodo Australia

  • shertink

    megadownload

  • Pingback: Aktuelles 19. Oktober 2012 — neunetz.com

  • Pingback: Novi Mega(upload) štitit ?e i sebe i korisnike snažnom enkripcijom i serverima širom svijeta | Netokracija

  • ndmushroom

    But… but what about child pornography?
    (isn’t that how it always starts?)

    • Derp

      I bet governments would love to blame kim dotcom for child porn.

  • http://altbin.net/ Alt.bin

    I Hope they’ll use Bitcoin as payment

  • Pingback: Megaupload, ritorno cifrato | infropy - information entropy

  • 0omg

    Mega or no mega the hydra will always prevail !!!

    • Liam Jh

      Hail Hydra

  • Pingback: Megaupload.com shut down for copyright violation - Page 8

  • Pingback: Como o novo Megaupload se prepara para nunca ser perseguido pelas autoridades | Micro Ploft

  • Pingback: » Blog Archive » Megaupload se convertirá en Mega, a prueba de redadas y demandas

  • Pingback: Rob's Personal Aggregator » The New Megaupload Has a Super Clever Way to Avoid Getting Raided Again

  • Pingback: Novi Mega(upload) štitit ?e i sebe i korisnike snažnom enkripcijom i serverima širom svijeta | it-vijesti

  • Pingback: Megaupload se convertirá en Mega, a prueba de redadas y demandas | Nicanoticias

  • Pingback: Megaupload: Nachfolger schützt Betreiber vor rechtlichen Konsequenzen - GIZMODO DE - Das Gadget-Weblog

  • Hiya_tiger

    Heil Mega,

    Heil Mega,

    Heil Mega,

    They will prevail this time.

  • audio geek

    as someone who works with musicians, i know they all would like to take mr. dotcom
    out for good.

    and they also think fawk sticks that keep down loading for free suck.

    bands don’t make much, if any money from touring, (except for the biggest artists)
    and now they don’t make money from putting outs a record.

    pretty soon the only music that will be coming out will be the sh!t your next door neighbor makes with garage band.

    o.k. you think i’m a dick. that’s fine we all have a right to our opinion.

    how much of your brain are you using to form yours?

  • angry

    dotcom the douche bag is screwing the people who make the music you enjoy.

    he gets rich giving you ‘free’ music.

    how? by SELLING YOUR PRIVATE AND PERSONAL INFO TO BUSINESSES.

    you have seen how high on the hog this guy lives?

    WHERE IS YOUR CUT OF THE PIE?

    THAT is the biggest scam of the internet.

    people sell YOU out.

    they sell your internet surfing history.

    they sell your personal online buying habits.

    they sell your perceived political and social tendencies.

    they sell anything they know about you…and that is A LOT.

    what do you get out of it?

    free shitty songs?

  • sanpom
  • Pingback: MEGA : El nuevo servicio en la nube de KIM DOTCOM | Eurosas IT

  • Guest

    The new Mega will NOT deflect copyright infringement from itself to its users. The new Mega can still be held liable for copyright infringement for its users.

    Even if the service is encrypted, that won’t necessarily prevent Hollywood or the record labels from suing. According to Santa Clara University law professor Eric Goldman a federal appeals court ruled nine years ago that a service provider can’t avoid liability for users’ copyright infringement merely by encrypting files. In that case, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that shut down the peer-to-peer service Aimster. The company argued that it didn’t know whether users were infringing copyright with the service because the files were encrypted. But the federal appellate court ruled that Aimster’s encryption didn’t give the company a defense. “Willful blindness is knowledge, in copyright law (where indeed it may be enough that the defendant should have known of the direct infringement,” the judges wrote. “A service provider that would otherwise be a contributory infringer does not obtain immunity by using encryption to shield itself from actual knowledge of the unlawful purposes for which the service is being used.”

    The new Mega with its encryption will now be an easy target to be sued for “facilitating copyright infringement”. If the prosecutor can show that Mega has encryption to allow users to cover copyright infringement and piracy then they will win and the new Mega will probably get shut down again.

  • Davey

    Kim really does have delusions of grandeur. He’s first got to win his Mega Upload case. Anyone wondered why nothing is moving in the courts. It’s because the case will be dragged on and on in order to incur costs for Mega which will disable his activities.

    Do you really think the people this is aimed at hurting are going to lose sleep over this new Mega product? Seriously come on. Making content owners agree not to sue if they get access to a take-down tool. Is he for real?, sounds like an idea thought up by a 16 year old. The law will simply change to ensure that whatever Mega do in order to continue profiting from copyright work is illegal.

  • Pingback: Podcast 54 – Not a lot happens on the corners | DJMcloud

  • Pingback: Megaupload se convertirá en Mega, a prueba de redadas y demandas | Dominios de Internet, Online Brand Protection, Online Security & Brand Monitoring

  • Pingback: O Mega Está Chegando! | Mundo dos Docs e Filmes

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

  • Pirates Can Be Identified Despite Sharing IP Addresses, ISP Claims

    Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation is a network mechanism through which many Internet subscribers can share the...

  • Feds Seize Cash from Major Bitcoin Exchange’s Dwolla Account

    The U.S. Government has taken a significant action against the web’s top Bitcoin exchange by seizing...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.