TorrentFreak

The place where breaking news, BitTorrent and copyright collide

Public Figures Protest Digital Economy Bill in Open Letter

A group of prominent public figures have published an open letter protesting the undemocratic methods likely to be used to push through the Digital Economy Bill. They argue that by passing controversial elements such as disconnections and site blocking without proper scrutiny, faith in politicians wall fall even further.

Despite protest from the public, the UK Government continues to push forward with the adoption of the Digital Economy Bill (DEB), legislation that will supposedly protect copyright holders from online pirates.

This week the House of Lords approved the Bill and handed it over to the House of Commons who will deal with the most controversial elements – disconnections and site-blocking – without proper scrutiny during the so-called “wash-up” period.

This and other controversies have absolutely enraged those who oppose the Bill and has led more than 10,000 voters in the last few days to write to their MPs to demand a full debate.

Last night, musician Billy Bragg, TalkTalk’s Andrew Heaney, Jim Killock from the Open Rights Group and Anthony Barnett from openDemocracy were joined by human rights activist Peter Tatchell, politicians from three political parties and numerous others to add their voices to the growing chorus of objection.

In an open letter they are demanding that the disconnections/throttling (aka technical measures) and site-blocking clauses are either properly debated or taken out of the Bill and “subjected to genuine democratic scrutiny in a new parliament.”

They emphasize that not only does the Bill threaten to breach human rights, suppress free speech and hamper legitimate activities on the web, but also poses a threat to the economy.

“Democracy and accountability will be sidestepped if this bill is rushed through and amended without debate during the so-called ‘wash-up’ process,” notes the letter, adding: “The thousands of people we know to be contacting their MPs with concerns will find their faith in politicians even further undermined.”

Indeed, the way this Bill has been handled from start to finish has proven deeply worrying but even if the Government ignores all dissent and presses ahead with its implementation, along with the suspensions, disconnections, site-blocking and all, one thing remains absolutely certain.

The main aim of propping up the “creative industries” (read: the BPI and its members) with this legislation will fail. People will not be heading back to music stores in their millions, they will feel bullied, intimidated and absolutely dedicated to finding new ways to carry on regardless, just as they are in France.

And there will be half a dozen ways to do just that and rest assured there will soon be plenty more – because people will create them. Welcome to the arms race.

Related Posts

Previous Post | Next Post

  • Anonymous

    It warms my heart to be living in a
    democracy.

    I’ve added my letter to my local MP,and just hope that this bill gets the time and argument it merits in the house of commons.Not that I think anything endearing of our politicians,but I would at least expect them to follow the democratic process that they were ELECTED to do.

  • Tron Legacy 2.0

    Well well well…………Oh well.

  • Cujo

    wall fail for sure

  • The X Files \\Conspiracies//

    Talk Talk already throttle. Andrew Heaney talks a good game, but, like the Corps hated by so many Pirates, he’s only concerned with how much money his “Corp” will lose if made to be the Internet Police. He talktalks about “fair judicial process” fair enough. But TT hate Pirates, just as much as BREIN MAFFIA et al

  • Sad

    Sucks to be in the UK, and the UK Sucks :)

  • anon2

    i wonder what the next thing will be that is forced through UK Pariament and made law? all because a particular industry wont (not cant!!) change it’s business strategy. once it has achieved this, it will be after complete control of the internet (their ultimate aim!!). then the use of p2p, torrents or any other means available to people to download music, movies etc will be encouraged not condemed because the industries will be able to charge.

  • hifh606

    Although the ISPs only care about profit, they are the only ones with any hope of defeating this bill. The government will never listen to the people, only big business.

  • Hit ‘em where it hurts

    Well, if filesharing actually increases sales, why don’t we all stop filesharing for Lent, as well as not buying any retail product. A silent but powerful protest

  • republicvsdemocracy

    Republic is what we need
    Not Democracy
    Where 51 percent decide what they want to do with the 49 percent
    Imagine making abortion illegal because of some voter
    Lets ban all firearm so that we become defenseless?
    This can only happen in a democracy

    We don’t need more law
    What we need is that our god given rights are not taken away by a ruthless politician.
    Why Do we need license to hunt, to fish, to drive, to travel to another country?
    Who decide what to do with us are nothing more then blackmail Bullies
    Who the hell have the right to tell us that making copy of video or sharing is illegal?
    Democracy is 2 wolf and 1 sheep decide whats for dinner
    when are people going to learn not to trust any politician
    not to vote
    not to comply with their idiotic policy
    we the people have the power to say no and to resist any rule we disagree with.
    they will use force but if too many dont cooperate the few that control us will lose their power and influence. so it is futile when many refuse to do what the few say. It is time we jump over the fence and bid politician goodbye.
    http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm

  • theo

    I wall fall as well

  • FatGiant

    I just imagine, that if all this started with a diner, what the heck was served?

    And, when they finish? What will they receive? Enough to clear their consciences? After they see their own sons and daughters being disconnected, or even themselves, will they start to make “special” diners to clean they’re connections?

    It will be fun to see what friends they’ll have after this. Knowing that they have been paid to vote to disconnect them. Remember to add them to your tweet accounts and facebook.

  • Apocalypse Now!

    Yep
    Republic really won the day when Bush forged the election

  • Anonymous

    woot up yours ifpi bpi sharky mandy mpaa bbc joe whiley.

    pure win

    remember copyright is no LAW it’s a civil issue and will remain so.

    so “illegal download” is simply a lie a made up law if you will.

  • Apocalypse Now!

    what?

  • Ninja

    At least there’s opposition.

    MAFIAA has been shooting their feet for sometime now so it’s no wonder they don’t care (or don’t see) the damage they are doing on their images.

    With the DEB they could join Hugo Chavez and China and live happy as dictators… heh

    On a side note, Chavez is trying to start his own great firewall in Venezuela. Will it succeed?

  • John Down

    Somehow deep in my heart I wish the bill gets through only to enjoy the suffering to come for the BPI and their members.

  • pirate

    Just wanted to address the argument @9 had. A license to drive exists so that the drivers on the road are reasonably safe. If everyone was allowed to drive, there would be more accidents. There would be no reasonable guarantee that those on road know all of the laws or even how to drive.

    Hunting and fishing licenses exist to protect the wildlife from being over hunted/fished and going extinct.

    See? Some government involvement is good.

    I don’t agree with all of the restrictions placed on traveling to other countries, but some of those restrictions are probably a result of issues between your home country and the country you wish to visit. The country you wish to visit may not want tourism. It’s not just the government wanting to bully you.

    So, I don’t think what you said is helping your argument.

  • Elected Politician

    We represent all, even the BPI! As the saying goes:

    “Without you I/we are nothing”

    Amen.

  • Trelew

    What I hate how Big Business has corrupted our governments & courts with backroom deals, spread their corporate-friendly propaganda in the news and media, and will cheerfully lower the boom on anyone who oppose their “Corporate Might Makes Right” agenda.

    It’s not just here, this is done all over the world. All so the corporate elite can lord over the rest of the world.

    This is a sad world we live in when sh!t like this continues to go on

  • IAmACarpetLicker

    Are there any web developers who will join me in creating a protest website to inform people of the bill? The protest should be to not buy or rent any media from the UK industry, at all.
    I will need a hand with site design and also raising awareness to get people signed up.

    Please give me a shout and we’ll get this thing going – sam@sassybox.net

    Thanks,
    IAmACarpetLicker

  • UK&proud

    I wonder what the punishment for file sharing will be when the Muslims are running the UK.Hand/feet chopped off maybe

  • vbr

    tbh this crap won’t happen, the bill may go through as is (although even that i doubt) but as soon as shit starts hitting the fan people won’t let it continue

    remember the poll tax? crap that the majority disagree with doesn’t stand a chance

    stop worrying, move along

  • Will

    I’m just waiting for my ISP to do something like this in the USA. I cant wait.

    “Hell will be a sanctuary for these bastards. The end of days will be upon them, for I will starve no more.” – GOD

    So says we all!

  • Pingback: Pirate Home Page » Public Figures Protest Digital Economy Bill in Open Letter

  • Anonymous

    Didn’t God also say “Thou shall not steal” ?

    Of course, it’s not stealing, it’s “sharing” albeit with about 12 million people, 10% at least who *might* have bought it, and about 1% who have a crisis of conscience and do actually buy it.

    So, no lost sales there then

  • Anonymous

    Tools like hide-my-ip make this Bill pointless. To think they’re planning spending half a billion on this! They’d get better value for money throwing it on a fire.

  • Pingback: Digital Clock Radio

  • lol

    Government = biggest most corrupt bunch of criminals in a position of power over the people. The money flows into their pockets from the corporate cartels and they try to balance this with not getting ‘caught’ with their hands in the cookie jar by the media and thus the public.

    All decision making on public policy is based on favours and backhanders.

    Nobody gets into politics for the good of others. You get into politics to help yourself to corporate and public coffers.

  • Bob

    So everyone complains about the Great Firewall in China, but what difference is this. It does the exact same thing as the Great Firewall of China.

    This just shows how corrupted upper government is. As long as everyone up there agrees you don’t have to consider the people’s opinions.

  • Ashamedtobebritish

    we didn’t even vote any of the idiots who proposed this undemocratic bill IN in the first place.

    I only hope this FAiLs

  • Stan.

    If UK ISPs wanted to defeat this ludicrous nonsense they should cut off the internet for 24 hours in protest.

    That would send a message to the “government” that could not be ignored.

    It may come to that, if the ISPs and their customers have the balls for a battle.

    How about it TalkTalk?

  • Rabbit80

    @Stan

    Even better, they should link up with VPN providers and give all their customers free VPN access with their broadband ;)

  • Pingback: Digital Blood Pressure | ANEROID MONITORS

  • tech guy

    this is how it go’s to buy what you want and f**k the people.

    Press Association, Sunday March 21 2010
    Labour has promised a crackdown on lobbying by ex-ministers after several of its senior MPs were filmed apparently offering their services for cash.

    The party rushed forward a manifesto pledge for tighter regulation and monitoring as it emerged politicians had claimed to be able to influence policy.

    Ex-Cabinet minister Stephen Byers was among retiring MPs interviewed by a fictitious US lobbying firm as part of a secret filming operation for a television documentary. He told an undercover reporter he had secured secret deals with ministers, could get confidential information from Number 10 and was able to help firms involved in price fixing get around the law.

    The North Tyneside MP retracted his claims the following day – insisting he had “never lobbied ministers on behalf of commercial interests” and had exaggerated his influence.

    The Sunday Times, which carried out the interviews with Channel 4′s Dispatches programme, said Mr Byers, who held several key cabinet portfolios such as trade and transport, wanted £5,000 a day.

    Another of those filmed was ex-health secretary Patricia Hewitt, who said she “completely rejected” the suggestion that she helped obtain a key seat on a Government advisory group for a client paying her £3,000 a day.

    She stressed that the role she had been discussing would only have been taken up after she stepped down as an MP at the imminent election and insisted there was “nothing unusual or improper in the business appointments that I have taken up since leaving Government”.

    Tory leader David Cameron promised tougher controls last month – warning that secret corporate lobbying was the “next big scandal waiting to happen” in Westminster after expenses.

    Stung by the latest revelations – which involved a number of retiring MPs including ex-minister Geoff Hoon and Margaret Moran – Labour said it too would act if it wins the general election.

    “There can never be any suggestion that companies and businesses can only speak to government by buying access through MPs or anybody else,” a spokesman said. “What this case shows is that we need more transparency in the entire lobbying system. That’s why we believe that the time has come to support a Statutory Register of Lobbyists and we will bring forward proposals to that effect in our manifesto, building on the work we have already done to create a voluntary code.”

  • Lord Lucas of Crudwell & Dingwall

    “My Lords I quite agree with the noble Lord that it is important to deal with the positions of search engines who are not directly addressed by the ammendments in the bill at the moment, by clause 18 in the bill. Google is in matter of fact very good at blocking access to sites, it just relegates them to page 256… (laughs) …it does it all the time (laughs). If it doesn’t like something that’s coming up there they just dissapear it in the rankings.

    So there are mechanisms out there that are commonly used by search engines, again, to make it inconvenient for people to find content that Google doesn’t approve of, and to go back to what the noble Lord Putnam said, it’s a question of taking these people, like the ISPs and the search engines, and joining them in, not letting them think that they’re in some way isolated, that they in some way have an ability to act all on their own without any thought into how they fit into the mesh of copyright and the melding of the interests of the consumer and of the producer that lies at the heart of it. All these players have a part to play, and yes we should protect what search engines do assiduously, and we should be very careful not to start playing the Chinese Government with them… but on the other hand, as I’m sure they won’t, they should not think that they can stand completely aside and act with complete freedom as if they don’t have a role in the way in which copyright is protected on the net.”

  • Lord Lucas of Crudwell & Dingwall

    “…it does seem to me that what we ought to be doing is making it inconvenient for people to find illegal material. There will always be people who will go to great lengths to find stuff that they should not. They are a small minority. It takes a lot of their time. What we’re after dealing with is the ordinary people who are finding it terribly easy to find illegal material at the moment. It’s as if every street was lined with stalls selling counterfeit goods.

    If we could just take them off, I mean… yeah new ones will pop up but they take time to get known, and when they’re known you knock them off,… you deal with the bulk of the business if you deal in the direction of Clause 18 it seems to me. And certainly we begin to answer the questions that were raised by noble Lord Treason when he spoke at committee, the people who are streaming football matches straight after the game, or maybe during the game, these people have identifiable sites,… people know where to go, you knock them on the head. Sure, a few will pop up elsewhere but before they can become big enough to do any damage they become big enough to notice and you sit on them again. It does seem to me that this is a sensible way to go down.

    Yes, we are going to need some proper protections for search engines. We’re going to need to think carefully how they feature in this. To what extent they can be asked to block material. I think they will have to be asked to block material to some extent. I looked for a copy of Stephen Fry reading one of Harry Potter stories the other day, [...], but I think the first three pages were occupied by illegal material when I looked for it on Google. It was extremely difficult to actually go on and find something legal. It was easy enough to identify them because they all referred to BitTorrent (laughs), so it would be easy enough to block them out of the index since they were obviously advertising that they were illegal services. I don’t see why search engines shouldn’t be able to block these things, and indeed it would be one of the most obvious ways of making life inconvenient for those who were… and it’s the easiest way to make life inconvenient compared with trying to block individuals Internet traffic is to take these things down off the search engines. So I do think this is going to be a productive way to go. I suspect it will require a lot more consideration than we’ve had time to give it, but I go back to my ammendment at committee, this is where clause 17 ought to be heading and, as has been suggested by the noble Lord, Lord Putnam, if this gets struck out of the bill at wash-up, we certainly ought to immediately begin discussions on how we can make a success of going down this route in order to deal effectively with piracy at source rather than just prosecuting those that happen to be ‘drinking the counterfeit rum’.”

    P.S. dissapear > disappear (the shame…, but hey, it’s early…;)

  • AnarchyNow

    UK is no democracy it has a fucking queen and is an empire.
    When UK citizen will get rid of monarchy and aristocracy and let Scotland and Ireland become independent, then maybe something will change.
    Till then they keep on being sheeps and cash cow slaves

  • talorthain

    Government coruption is nothing new. They are in it for themselves. It doesnt matter who gets in, things never change, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

    If they can rip us off for duck houses, second mortgages, putting new light bulbs in, why would they give a second thought to disconnecting policies for a govenrment that wont get elected next time.

    The push is now, purley because of the change in parliment which will happen in the next election.

    What we should be saying is, we will vote for you, if you dont ever put this bill into place, they might start listening then.

  • Pingback: What is the different between CPA and PA ? « The CPA Affiliate Marketing System

  • Pingback: Digital Blood Pressure | Mabis Health Care Products

  • Pingback: In UK, a big threat to Internet freedom « News From Underground

  • Law in britian

    @#9 , the uk has a common law system copyright is not a cival matter therefore tougher sanctions can be had.

  • Stan.

    @34,

    I’ve been pushing for independence for England for years, but no one listens.

    But, what can you do?

  • Anonymous

    @34

    Queen has nothing to do with it, this is entirely down to Mandelson and several MPs being bribed, and the rest not knowing enough about the subject matter to go against it. The Queen has no power, and is just there to stamp the forms the government put in front of her, and pose for the media. If you get rid of her it won’t make any difference, the government will still be corrupt, and will still **** over everyone living in the UK.

  • Pingback: Digital Clock Radio

  • RATM

    Quoting 19 – “Corporate Might Makes Right”

    …sad but true…

  • TerribleTony

    “Welcome to the arms race.”

    Oh TF, you truly warm my heart sometimes. :)

  • Ricardo

    No doubt it will pass. A country that forged proofs and lied to the world to start a war agaist Iraqui, can push this law through our throat. They do not bother with our opinion.
    I’m not saying Sadan was a good guy, but USA and UK Knew there were no mass destruction weapons there. They also used a pirated school lesson to justify it.
    This bill will pass; this is not democracy.

  • Anonymous

    @24

    Got anymore percentages in your arse?

  • mehh

    An arms race I plan to win. OOORRAAAHH!!!

  • Pingback: UK Pirate Party Announces 2010 Election Lineup - P2P Talk?

  • Pingback: UK Pirate Party Announces 2010 Election Lineup | News.Scenetv.info

  • Pingback: UK Pirate Party Announces 2010 Election Lineup | We R Pirates

  • Pingback: UK Pirate Party Announces 2010 Election Lineup | InstantIdiocy

  • BTGuard - BitTorrent Anonymously

NewsBits

Even more news...

  • The Pirate Bay Isn’t Down Completely, Just Having a Few Issues

    Twitter and Facebook, not to mention the TorrentFreak inbox, are currently alive with complaints that The...

  • Pirate Bay Founder Gottfrid Svartholm on Freedom of Speech

    Freedom of speech is a highly valued commodity, but should people be allowed to say whatever...

  • Blu-ray Anti-Piracy Tech Stops Discs and Promotes Purchases

    An anti-piracy system present in all official Blu-ray players since 2012 has received a fresh update...

  • Foxtel Breeds Pirates by Locking Up Game of Thrones

    One of the main reasons why people turn to piracy is the lack of legal alternatives....

  • UK Student Admits Breaching Sony Copyrights With Leak of PS3 SDK

    Last year an Internet user known as El Nomeo leaked version 3.70 of Sony’s Playstation3 SDK...

MostDiscussed

Below are TorrentFreak's most discussed articles of the past month. Join the discussion if you like.

CopyQuote

Left Quote

“The Pirate Bay has been one of the most important movements in Sweden for freedom of speech, working against corruption and censorship.

Peter Sunde Left Quote

PopularArticles

A selection of some TorrentFreak's classics dug up from our archives.